Skip to main content
Asian Journal of Neurosurgery logoLink to Asian Journal of Neurosurgery
. 2017 Oct-Dec;12(4):731–734. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_45_15

Occipital Intraparenchymal Myxopapillary Ependymoma: Case Report and Literature Review

Tushit Bharat Mewada 1,, Ishu Hetram Bishnoi 1, Hukum Singh 1, Daljit Singh 1
PMCID: PMC5652108  PMID: 29114296

Abstract

Myxopapillary ependymoma (MPE) is a histological variant of ependymoma found in the conus medullaris or filum terminale region. Intracranial occurrence of the tumor is a rarity. The most characteristic histological feature of myxopapillary tumors is the abundance of intercellular and perivascular mucin and the arborizing vasculature, which tends to form papillae. We are reporting a 14-year-old patient presented with seizures caused by the right occipital region intraparenchymal lesion. Histopathology confirmed it to be MPE. Lesion was excised completely. Literature reviews on the topic are discussed regarding the histological findings, natural history, and outcome of surgically treated MPE. This is the fifth reported case of cerebral intraparenchymal primary MPE.

Keywords: Intraparenchymal, myxopapillary ependymoma, pseudorosettes

Introduction

Myxopapillary ependymoma (MPE) is a histological variant of ependymoma found in the conus medullaris or filum terminale region. Intracranial occurrence of the tumor is a rarity. According to the WHO classification, spinal cord MPEs are grade 1 tumors with favorable outcome after complete resection even though metastasis present. In literature, four cases are reported for cerebral intraparenchymal MPEs with no ventricular extension. We are reporting fifth case of occipital region MPE.

Case Report

A 14-year-old male patient presented with two episodes of seizures (generalized tonic–clonic) within 6 months duration. His medical history was unremarkable. On neurological examination, there was no deficit. There was no cranial nerve involvement, sensory motor deficits, gait changes, vision deterioration, gait changes, or higher mental function derangements.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain demonstrated a mass hypointense on T1-weighted imaging, hyperintense on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging in the right occipital lobe which was heterogeneously contrast enhancing [Figure 1]. Low-grade glioma was considered as the first diagnostic entity and operative intervention was planned. The patient was operated in prone position, right occipital craniotomy, and tumor near total resection done. Frozen section report was low-grade glioma.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Magnetic resonance imaging brain showing axial image of hypointense mass on T1-weighted image (a), hyperintense mass on T2-weighted image (b), which is heterogeneously contrast enhancing (c), and hyperintense on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence (d)

Histopathological consideration

Histological examination of tumor specimen stained with hematoxylin and eosin showed a cellular tumor consisting of medium-sized neoplastic cells arranged around stromal vessels and forming papillary structures. Variable amount of mucoid material seen around blood vessels with red blood cells in vascular lumen. There were areas of pseudorosettes formation also consistent with MPEs [Figure 2]. For publication of data, we took consent from patient and approval from institute.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Histopathological examination show on hematoxylin and eosin preparation (a) medium-sized neoplastic cells arranged around stromal vessels and forming papillary structures with variable amount of mucoid material, (b) pseudorosettes formation

Postoperative course

In view of histopathological findings, MRI of the total neuraxis was performed, which did not reveal any lesion, particularly of the conus medullaris or filum terminale [Figure 3]. The patient recovered well after surgery. Regular follow-up with MRI of total neuraxis is planned. No adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy is planned for this patient.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Magnetic resonance imaging spine showing T2-weighted images of magnetic resonance imaging spine showing no lesions

Discussion

Ependymomas make up 6% of all gliomas and account for 1%–9% of intracranial tumors and 60% of spinal cord gliomas.[1] Intracranial location of ependymoma is more common in children, whereas spinal cord is more involved in adults.[2] Virchow first described an ependymoma, which consisted of ependymal cells forming ependymal rosettes and perivascular pseudorosettes.[3] The term MPE was first used by Kernohan showing an ependymoma with heavily branching papillary form, hyalinized blood vessels, and abundant intercellular and perivascular mucin.[4,5] Histopathologically, MPEs are low-grade tumors as per the WHO classification they are classified as grade 1 tumors.[6]

The usual age of presentation is from third to fifth decade.[7] Intradural MPEs almost exclusively occur at the conus medullaris or filum terminale. Extraspinal MPEs most commonly present as subcutaneous soft tissues in the sacrococcygeal region.[8,9,10] These are thought to arise as a result of neoplastic transformation of ependymal rest cells in this area.[10] Other rarer sources include the peritoneum-pelvic regions involving the ovary, broad ligament, meso-ovarium and omentum, and the lungs and mediastinum.[11] Reported cases show variable intracranial distribution including lateral ventricle,[5,12,13] forth ventricle,[7,14] cerebellopontine angle,[15] medulla oblongata,[16] falx cerebri,[13] and intraparenchymal.[4,17,18,19] Only five cases are reported for cerebral intraparenchymal location, including this case [Table 1].

Table 1.

Reported cerebral intraparenchymal myxopapillary ependymomas

graphic file with name AJNS-12-731-g004.jpg

MPEs are uncommon and make up approximately 15% of all ependymomas.[20] The microscopic appearance of MPE is characterized by pseudopapillary formation with symmetrical zones of mucoid matrix surrounding branching tumescent vessels as well as accumulation of mucin within and between tumor cells.[20] The mean proliferating index of this subtype is 2.4 versus 21% for anaplastic ependymomas.[21]

Although MPEs are grade I tumors with a tendency for slow growth and local recurrence, they are capable of spread within the central nervous system and extraneural metastasis.[22,23] There are occasional case reports of local bony invasion and peritoneal seeding.[23,24] MPE of the cauda equina region commonly recurs locally, often after an interval of many years, but the prognosis is good even after local recurrence or subarachnoid metastasis. Intracranial metastases of MPEs are rare, especially in the pediatric population.[25] Although the quoted recurrence rate of spinal MPEs ranges from 10% to 40% (with or without subset analysis of completeness of resection), the recurrence rates in children may be as high as 50%.[20,26,27,28]

There are no clear guidelines in the management of primary intracranial MPEs. These lesions are considered to be more benign than general ependymomas as being the WHO grade 1 tumor. No prospective study is available in the management of intracranial MPEs; however, the management strategies are guided by experience in treatment of spinal MPEs. Albeit from literature some conclusions can be drawn which are as follows:

  • There are patients who are disease-free for many years after gross total resection without radiation therapy[3]

  • Complete removal is the best therapeutic option[27,28,29]

  • Recurrence and subarachnoid or systemic metastasis are possible even after gross total resection and radiation therapy. It is possible to achieve a good outcome with subtotal resection and irradiation[30,31]

  • Histological features are not generally helpful in determining the prognosis of MPEs[20]

  • There is no difference in outcome for irradiated versus nonirradiated patients, and this fact would suggest that radiation therapy is not effective although the consensus yet to be achieved. More recently, it has been shown that patients with spinal MPEs who received immediate postoperative radiation therapy (≥45 Gy) had 5- and 10-year progression-free survival rates that were significantly better than those of patients who did not receive any adjuvant therapy, including patients thought to have undergone a total resection.[29,31]

On the basis of these data, it is recommended that radiation be delayed until recurrence tumors undergoing gross total resection. Local radiation therapy may be indicated in subtotal resected tumors or recurrence (controversial). In the case of our patient reported here, no adjuvant radiation therapy is planned because serial neuraxis imaging does not demonstrate residual or recurrent pathology at this time.

Conclusion

This is the fifth reported case of histologically proven primary cerebral intraparenchymal MPE. It is hypothesized that intracranial MPEs arise from rests of fetal ependymal cells that migrated from periventricular regions. Although rare, MPEs outside of the filum terminale do exist.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Lyons MK, Kelly PJ. Posterior fossa ependymomas: Report of 30 cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 1991;28:659–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mork SJ, Loken AC. Ependymoma: A follow-up study of 101 cases. Cancer. 1977;40:907–15. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197708)40:2<907::aid-cncr2820400247>3.0.co;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ho DM, Hsu CY, Wong TT, Chiang H. A clinicopathologic study of 81 patients with ependymomas and proposal of diagnostic criteria for anaplastic ependymoma. J Neurooncol. 2001;54:77–85. doi: 10.1023/a:1012590505236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tzerakis N, Georgakoulias N, Kontogeorgos G, Mitsos A, Jenkins A, Orphanidis G. Intraparenchymal myxopapillary ependymoma: Case report. Neurosurgery. 2004;55:981. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000137278.84588.06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Warnick RE, Raisanen J, Adornato BT, Prados MD, Davis RL, Larson DA, et al. Intracranial myxopapillary ependymoma: Case report. J Neurooncol. 1993;15:251–6. doi: 10.1007/BF01050071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kleihues P, Bureger PC, Scheithauer BW. Definitions and explanatory notes. In: Kleihues P, editor. World Health Organization Histological Typing of Tumors of the Central Nervous System. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1993. pp. 17–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lim SC, Jang SJ. Myxopapillary ependymoma of the fourth ventricle. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2006;108:211–4. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Anderson MS. Myxopapillary ependymomas presenting in the soft tissue over the sacrococcygeal region. Cancer. 1966;19:585–90. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196604)19:4<585::aid-cncr2820190418>3.0.co;2-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rao IS, Kapila K, Aggarwal S, Ray R, Gupta AK, Verma K. Subcutaneous myxopapillary ependymoma presenting as a childhood sacrococcygeal tumor: A case report. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002;27:303–7. doi: 10.1002/dc.10183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Helwig EB, Stern JB. Subcutaneous sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma. A clinicopathologic study of 32 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1984;81:156–61. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/81.2.156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Estrozi B, Queiroga E, Bacchi CE, Faria Soares de Almeida V, Lucas de Carvalho J, Lageman GM, et al. Myxopapillary ependymoma of the posterior mediastinum. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2006;10:283–7. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2006.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sato H, Ohmura K, Mizushima M, Ito J, Kuyama H. Myxopapillary ependymoma of the lateral ventricle. A study on the mechanism of its stromal myxoid change. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1983;33:1017–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Matyja E, Naganska E, Zabek M, Koziara H. Myxopapillary ependymoma of the lateral ventricle with local recurrences: Histopathological and ultrastructural analysis of a case. Folia Neuropathol. 2003;41:51–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tseng YC, Hsu HL, Jung SM, Chen CJ. Primary intracranial myxopapillary ependymomas: Report of two cases and review of the literature. Acta Radiol. 2004;45:344–7. doi: 10.1080/02841850410004931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sparaco M, Morelli L, Piscioli I, Donato S, Catalucci A, Licci S. Primary myxopapillary ependymoma of the cerebellopontine angle: Report of a case. Neurosurg Rev. 2009;32:241–4. doi: 10.1007/s10143-008-0160-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.DiLuna ML, Levy GH, Sood S, Duncan CC. Primary myxopapillary ependymoma of the medulla: Case report. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:E1208–9. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000369513.84063.A6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Maruyama R, Koga K, Nakahara T, Kishida K, Nabeshima K. Cerebral myxopapillary ependymoma. Hum Pathol. 1992;23:960–2. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(92)90413-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ralte AM, Rao S, Sharma MC, Suri A, Gaikwad S, Sarkar C. Myxopapillary ependymoma of the temporal lobe – Report of a rare case of temporal lobe epilepsy. Clin Neuropathol. 2004;23:53–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Patangia P, Rai N, Saxena R, Mandawat P. Primary intracerebral myxopapillary ependymoma: A rare case report. Ann Pathol Lab Med. 2016;3:c236–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sonneland PR, Scheithauer BW, Onofrio BM. Myxopapillary ependymoma. A clinicopathologic and immunocytochemical study of 77 cases. Cancer. 1985;56:883–93. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850815)56:4<883::aid-cncr2820560431>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rezai AR, Woo HH, Lee M, Cohen H, Zagzag D, Epstein FJ. Disseminated ependymomas of the central nervous system. J Neurosurg. 1996;85:618–24. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.85.4.0618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Higgins GS, Smith C, Summers DM, Statham PX, Erridge SC. Myxopapillary ependymoma with intracranial metastases. Br J Neurosurg. 2005;19:356–8. doi: 10.1080/02688690500305373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Plans G, Brell M, Cabiol J, Villà S, Torres A, Acebes JJ. Intracranial retrograde dissemination in filum terminale myxopapillary ependymomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006;148:343–6. doi: 10.1007/s00701-005-0693-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fassett DR, Pingree J, Kestle JR. The high incidence of tumor dissemination in myxopapillary ependymoma in pediatric patients. Report of five cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 2005;102(1 Suppl):59–64. doi: 10.3171/ped.2005.102.1.0059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mridha AR, Sharma MC, Sarkar C, Suri V, Rishi A, Garg A, et al. Myxopapillary ependymoma of lumbosacral region with metastasis to both cerebellopontine angles: Report of a rare case. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007;23:1209–13. doi: 10.1007/s00381-007-0423-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bagley CA, Kothbauer KF, Wilson S, Bookland MJ, Epstein FJ, Jallo GI. Resection of myxopapillary ependymomas in children. J Neurosurg. 2007;106(4 Suppl):261–7. doi: 10.3171/ped.2007.106.4.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Celli P, Cervoni L, Cantore G. Ependymoma of the filum terminale: Treatment and prognostic factors in a series of 28 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1993;124:99–103. doi: 10.1007/BF01401130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Epstein FJ, Farmer JP, Freed D. Adult intramedullary spinal cord ependymomas: The result of surgery in 38 patients. J Neurosurg. 1993;79:204–9. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.79.2.0204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Akyurek S, Chang EL, Yu TK, Little D, Allen PK, McCutcheon I, et al. Spinal myxopapillary ependymoma outcomes in patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy at M.D. Anderson. Cancer Center J Neurooncol. 2006;80:177–83. doi: 10.1007/s11060-006-9169-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lin YH, Huang CI, Wong TT, Chen MH, Shiau CY, Wang LW, et al. Treatment of spinal cord ependymomas by surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy. J Neurooncol. 2005;71:205–10. doi: 10.1007/s11060-004-1386-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pica A, Miller R, Villà S, Kadish SP, Anacak Y, Abusaris H, et al. The results of surgery, with or without radiotherapy, for primary spinal myxopapillary ependymoma: A retrospective study from the rare cancer network. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74:1114–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Journal of Neurosurgery are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES