Abstract
To identify antibodies suitable for multiple myeloma (MM) immunotherapy, a cellular screening approach was developed using plasma cell lines JK-6L and INA-6 and human synthetic single-chain fragment variable (scFv) phage libraries. Isolated phage antibodies were screened for myeloma cell surface reactivity. Due to its binding characteristics, phage PIII-15 was selected to generate the scFv-Fc fusion protein TP15-Fc with an Fc domain optimized for FcγRIIIa binding. Various MM cell lines and patient-derived CD138-positive malignant plasma cells, but not granulocytes, B or T lymphocytes from healthy donors were recognized by TP15-Fc. Human intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1/CD54) was identified as target antigen by using transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Of note, no cross-reactivity of TP15-Fc with mouse ICAM-1 transfected cells was detected. TP15-Fc was capable to induce antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) against different human plasma cell lines and patients’ myeloma cells with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and purified NK cells. Importantly, TP15-Fc showed potent in vivo efficacy and completely prevented growth of human INA-6.Tu1 plasma cells in a xenograft SCID/beige mouse model. Thus, the novel ADCC-optimized TP15-Fc exerts potent anti-myeloma activity and has promising characteristics to be further evaluated for MM immunotherapy.
Keywords: multiple myeloma, immunotherapy, antibody, ICAM-1, phage display
INTRODUCTION
MM is a malignant plasma cell disorder that accounts for approx. 10-15% of the hematologic malignancies in the US and Europe [1, 2]. So called ‘novel drugs’ like proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) in combination with stem cell transplantation have led to an increased overall survival [2, 3], but still most of the patients, especially patients ineligible for transplantation, older than 65 years and/or relapsed/refractory to PIs and IMiDs, succumb to their disease and new treatment approaches are needed. In recent years, more and more efforts have been made to evaluate monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antibody-derived immunotherapeutic agents for use in MM therapy [4–7]. As first-in-class agents daratumumab (CD38) and elotuzumab (CD319) have been FDA-approved at the end of 2015 [8, 9].
Therapeutic mAbs are well established for the treatment of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors [10, 11]. To date, they are predominantly of human IgG1 isotype. IgG1 mAbs exert their functions either directly via Fab-mediated effects or by interacting with certain Fcγ receptors (FcγR) on immune cells as well as by activating complement. Since the FcγRIIIa V158F and the FcγRIIa H131R polymorphisms were correlated with the ability of IgG1 mAbs to efficiently recruit immune effector cells, i.e. NK cells for ADCC and macrophages for ADCP, and have an impact on their clinical efficacy, strategies have been developed to improve effector cell recruitment [12, 13]. Such attempts include amino acid exchanges (protein-engineering) and modifications in the glycosylation pattern (glyco-engineering) [14–16]. Currently, two glyco-engineered mAbs, obinutuzumab (CD20) and mogamulizumab (anti-CCR4), are approved as anti-cancer agents [17, 18], and protein-engineered mAbs are evaluated in preclinical studies [19–21]. For MM therapy, such engineered mAbs might be beneficial for instance in the post-transplant setting where NK cells recover early after stem cell transplantation [22, 23], or in full-blown MM where NK cell numbers and activity are also low [24]. Moreover, the combination of Fc-engineered mAbs with lenalidomide, known to lower NK cell activation levels and to stimulate immune effector cells [25, 26], can be a promising approach. As shown for Xmab5592, a humanized IgG1 directed against HM1.24/CD317, Fc-engineered mAbs can have potent anti-myeloma activity and be synergistically active in combination with lenalidomide in vivo [27].
In addition, anti-myeloma agents that impair interactions between the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment and malignant plasma cells can be of particular interest [28]. Cell surface proteins which are involved in myeloma cell adhesion to BM stromal cells (BMSC) could be potential targets for therapeutic mAbs. Those include members of the integrin and adhesion protein families and their natural receptors, e.g. vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1/CD54). Increased serum levels of both, VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, were reported to be associated with advanced disease and poor outcome in MM patients [29].
To identify antibodies targeting cell surface antigens on malignant plasma cells that have potential as immunotherapeutic agents, we have employed phage display technology with human single chain fragment variable (scFv) antibody libraries and a cellular panning strategy. Phage PIII-15 was selected based on its favorable binding profile and converted into a human scFv-Fc fusion protein named TP15-Fc, that specifically targets human ICAM-1/CD54. TP15-Fc induced significant ADCC against myeloma cells and, importantly, completely prevented MM growth in vivo. Thus, TP15-Fc has potential as a novel therapeutic anti-myeloma antibody.
RESULTS
Isolation of phages preferentially binding to myeloma cells
To identify anti-myeloma antibodies, the two human Tomlinson phage libraries were subjected to cellular screening (Supplementary Figure 1). The Tomlinson I and J libraries were generated at Greg Winter's lab in Cambridge and are both based on the most common human frameworks for VH (V3-23/DP-47and JH4b) and Vκ (O12/O2/DPK9 and Jκ1). The high diversity of more than 100 million different scFv fragments/phages per library was reached by side chain diversity incorporated in the antigen binding sites, i.e. the CDR2 and CDR3 regions, through DVT codon usage in the Tomlinson I library and NNK codon usage in the Tomlinson J library. Both libraries were pre-absorbed in consecutive rounds against polymorphonuclear cells (PMN)/granulocytes and T lymphocytes from different healthy donors to deplete phages binding to these leukocyte subsets and HLA antigens. The pre-absorbed libraries were incubated with a mixture of JK-6L MM cells and T lymphocytes. T cells were subsequently depleted by MACS and the vital myeloma cells (CD138+/7-AAD-) were sorted by FACS. Bound phages were eluted, amplified and used for two additional panning rounds with INA-6 and JK-6L plasma cells. While less than 1×104 phages were isolated after the first panning round from both libraries, panning rounds 2 and 3 resulted in 1-2×108 phages. Enrichment factors (EF) of 7857 and 1333, respectively, were achieved for the Tomlinson I and J libraries from round 1 to 2, while no significant further enrichment was observed with subsequent rounds (Supplementary Table 1).
The binding properties of the isolated phages from the individual panning rounds were tested by whole-cell ELISA and flow cytometry. As shown for the original libraries (input), no significant binding to any of the tested cell types was observed. In contrast, the phages from the subsequent panning rounds showed increased binding to INA-6, JK-6L, L363, and RPMI-8226 plasma cell lines (Figures 1A and 1B). While granulocytes/PMN were only marginally recognized by all phages, reactivity with T lymphocytes and CEM cells (T-ALL) was detected predominately for the phages of the Tomlinson J library (Figure 1A). Importantly, no reactivity of the Tomlinson I library phages was seen with CEM and the myeloid cell line KG-1a by flow cytometry (Figure 1B). Thus, further analyses were particularly performed with phages from the Tomlinson I library. As shown in Figure 1C, 39 of 48 (81 %) E. coli supernatants containing single phage antibodies tested with JK-6L and CEM cells in ELISA showed strong and exclusive reactivity with the JK-6L MM cells. Hence, the applied panning strategy resulted in the successful isolation of monoclonal phage antibodies binding to myeloma cell lines. Of note, since a fixed volume (100 μl) of phage-containing supernatants without prior quantification were used in this ELISA experiment, no direct comparison between the binding properties of the single phage antibodies can be made. By screening defined quantities of 5×1010 single phage clones from panning rounds 2 and 3, phage PIII-15, obtained from the third round of panning, was selected for further functional analyses due to its significant binding to different myeloma/plasma cell leukemia (PCL) and Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines, while binding to other leukemia cell lines (CEM, KG-1a), PBMC and the indicated leukocyte subpopulations was not observed (Figure 1D). Importantly, PIII-15 also bound to CD138+ malignant plasma cells of a PCL patient, whereas no reactivity was observed with CD3+ T lymphocytes and CD56+ cells (predominantly NK cells) of an healthy individual (Figure 1E).
Generation of the human scFv-Fc fusion protein TP15-Fc
The scFv sequence of phage PIII-15 was used to generate a fully human scFv-Fc fusion protein with an ADCC-optimized human IgG1 Fc domain (Figure 2A). By incorporating the amino acid exchanges S239D and I332E in the Fc domain ADCC activity is strongly enhanced [11], whereas the A330L mutation considerably reduces CDC activity of the resulting Fc-engineered scFv-Fc fusion protein TP15-Fc. The recombinant proteins TP15-Fc and the equally constructed control molecule 4D5-Fc, directed against HER2 [57], were expressed by transient transfection of Lenti-X 293T cells and purified from cell culture supernatants by affinity chromatography. Analyses of the protein preparations by size exclusion chromatography revealed a predominant peak at ~12 ml elution volume for both proteins (Figure 2B). Compared to standard proteins, i.e. aldolase (158 kDa) and ovalbumin (43 kDa), TP15-Fc and 4D5-Fc elute in the range of proteins with a molecular weight of ~160 kDa. Gel electrophoresis and Coomassie staining of the final preparations showed pure proteins with molecular masses of ~60 and ~150 kDa under reducing and non-reducing conditions, respectively (Figure 2C). The calculated masses of TP15-Fc and 4D5-Fc were 124 kDa and 128 kDa, respectively. The differences between calculated and observed molecular masses might be due to protein glycosylation and the c-myc-(His)6-tag which may change migration behaviour in affinity chromatography and gel electrophoresis. Routinely 2.5 - 3.0 mg protein per liter cell culture supernatant was produced. Importantly, concentration-dependent binding of TP15-Fc to INA-6, L363, and RPMI-8226 cells could be measured by flow cytometry, while the control molecule 4D5-Fc did not show any reactivity with these cells (Figure 2D), but as expected, significantly bound to Her2-positive SKBR-3 cells (Figure 2E). The EC50 values measured for TP15-Fc binding to the plasmacytoma cell lines were in the range of 37 - 119 nM (4.6 - 14.8 μg/ml).
TP15-Fc binds to ICAM-1 on myeloma cell lines and malignant plasma cells from patients
To further investigate the binding specificity of TP15-Fc, flow cytometric analyses were performed with a panel of human lymphoid and non-lymphoid cell lines. As summarized in Table 1, TP15-Fc did neither bind to T-ALL cell lines (CEM, Jurkat) nor to non-lymphoid leukemia cell lines (HEL, KG-1a, HL60, K562), but reacted with different myeloma and Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines. Importantly, TP15-Fc also bound to freshly isolated or cryo-conserved malignant plasma cells from patients with MM and PCL (Figure 3A). Thus, the antigen recognized by TP15-Fc is also expressed on the surface of patients’ MM cells. Reactivity of TP15-Fc with non-malignant leukocytes was tested with isolated subpopulations from healthy donors. TP15-Fc did not bind to granulocytes (PMN), B or T lymphocytes, and showed marginal reactivity with resting NK cells and monocytes. Endothelial cells (HUVEC) were positively stained by TP15-Fc, but antigen density was remarkably lower than that on myeloma cell lines (Figure 3B and Supplementary Figure 4A).
Table 1. TP15-Fc binding to human lymphoma and leukemia cell lines.
Cell line | Binding | RFI ± SD | |
---|---|---|---|
B cell derived | |||
INA-6 | plasma cell leukemia | ++ | 15.2 ± 5.9 |
JK-6L | multiple myeloma | + | 5.9 ± 0.2 |
L363 | plasma cell leukemia | ++ | 9.8 ± 2.6 |
MM1.S | multiple myeloma | + | 2.7 ± 1.7 |
RPMI-8226 | multiple myeloma | +++ | 46.2 ± 0.8 |
U266 | multiple myeloma | ++ | 25.8 ± 9.8 |
ARH-77 | B-lymphoblastoid cells (EBV+) | + | 7.9 ± 2.2 |
SEM | B cell precursor leukemia | - | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
Daudi | Burkitt's lymphoma | ++ | 10.2 ± 2.1 |
Raji | Burkitt's lymphoma | ++ | 17.2 ± 7.2 |
Ramos | Burkitt's lymphoma | + | 6.0 ± 1.9 |
T cell derived | |||
CEM | T-ALL | - | 1.0 ± 0.2 |
Jurkat | T-ALL | - | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
Non-lymphoid | |||
HEL | erythroleukemia | - | 1.2 ± 0.2 |
KG-1a | immature AML | - | 1.5 ± 0.6 |
HL60 | AML | - | 1.0 ± 0.2 |
K562 | CML | (+) | 2.2 ± 0.5 |
RFI values calculated for binding of 10 μg/ml TP15-Fc relative to 4D5-Fc on 500.000 cells/sample. SD, standard deviation; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; T-ALL, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; +++ RFI > 30, ++ RFI > 10, + RFI > 2.5, - RFI < 2.
Since immunoprecipitation with TP15-Fc failed and the scFv-Fc fusion protein was also not suitable as a detection antibody in Western blotting (data not shown), ELISA and flow cytometric analyses were performed with stably transfected CHO-K1 cells expressing one of nine individual antigens known to be expressed on malignant plasma cells (Supplementary Figure 2). Based on its reactivity with CHO cells expressing CD54, human ICAM-1 was identified as target antigen of TP15-Fc. As shown in Figure 4A, fluorescence intensity of TP15-Fc binding correlated with ICAM-1 expression levels on stably transfected CHO clones. To analyze species cross-reactivity, 293T cells were transfected with either human or mouse ICAM-1. Analysis revealed specific binding of TP15-Fc to cells expressing human ICAM-1, but not to the murine homologue (Figure 4B).
TP15-Fc induced significant ADCC against myeloma cell lines
Fc-mediated effector functions of TP15-Fc were evaluated in standard 51Cr release assays. Using PBMC of healthy individuals at an effector-to-target (E:T) ratio of 80:1, TP15-Fc induced significant lysis of all five plasma cell lines tested when used at 10 μg/ml (Figure 5A). As shown for INA-6 plasma cells, significant dose-dependent killing was observed for TP15-Fc, but not for 4D5-Fc (Figure 5B). Concentration-dependent activity was further tested using either PBMC or purified NK cells of healthy donors with E:T ratios of 80:1 and 10:1, respectively, and patient-derived mononuclear cells containing 33 - 99 % CD138+ malignant plasma cells. As shown in Figure 5C, TP15-Fc induced dose-dependent lysis with PBMC and NK cells as effector cells. Notably, the EC50 value was more than 10-fold lower and in the pM range when purified NK cells instead of PBMC were used (EC50 NK = 80 ng/ml vs. EC50 PBMC = 1100 ng/ml, i.e. 645 pM vs. 8.9 nM). In contrast, only marginal ADCC activity was observed with TP15-Fc against HUVEC endothelial cells when NK cells were used, whereas 4D5-Fc was much more potent since Her2 is also expressed on these cells (Supplementary Figure 4B). Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) of TP15-Fc was evaluated with serum of healthy human donors and Raji and Daudi Burkitt lymphoma cells. In contrast to rituximab, no CDC activity was observed with TP15-Fc (Fig. 5D and Supplementary Figure 4C), which is most likely due to the A330L mutation that dramatically reduces C1q binding affinity [15]. Furthermore, TP15-Fc did not directly inhibit proliferation of INA-6, L363 and RPMI-8226 myeloma cells, as well as growth of HUVEC endothelial cells (Supplementary Figure 3, and 4D). Thus, the major anti-myeloma effector mechanism identified for TP15-Fc was ADCC with low reactivity observed against healthy human endothelial cells.
TP15-Fc inhibited myeloma growth in vivo
To investigate the in vivo potency of TP15-Fc, the INA-6.Tu1 xenograft model was used [30]. Five to ten SCID/beige mice were divided into three groups and treatment was started two days after tumor cell injection. Vehicle and 4D5-Fc treated mice developed tumors and needed to be sacrificed within 55 days (Figure 6A). Measurement of human interleukin 6-receptor (huIL-6R) in final sera of mice revealed huIL-6R concentrations between approx. 10 – 150 ng/ml that correlated with explanted tumor sizes (Figure 6B). In contrast, all animals receiving TP15-Fc survived until the end of the experiment without any sign of tumor growth and with no huIL-6R detectable in final sera (day 120; Figure 6). Thus, treatment with the ADCC-optimized TP15-Fc scFv-Fc fusion protein completely prevented INA-6.Tu1 plasma cell growth in this myeloma xenograft model.
DISCUSSION
In the current report, a novel anti-human ICAM-1/CD54 scFv-Fc fusion protein (TP15-Fc) was identified by a cellular screening strategy intended to isolate antibodies for immunotherapy of MM from human phage libraries. Notably, TP15-Fc completely prevented myeloma cells growth in the INA-6.Tu1 in vivo model. In vitro TP15-Fc exerts its anti-myeloma activity predominantly via ADCC with human NK cells, an important effector mechanism of therapeutic mAbs.
By using highly diverse phage libraries and a cellular panning strategy with initial negative selection and three subsequent panning rounds with INA-6 and JK-6L plasma cell lines, phages could be isolated preferentially targeting cell surface structures on human myeloma cell lines. A whole-cell panning protocol and the flow cytometry-based isolation of tumor cells from mixtures with non-malignant cells can substantially enhance tumor specificity of the obtained phage antibodies [31–33]. Nevertheless, isolated phage antibodies were not exclusively myeloma-specific. Thus, developing even more stringent pre-absorption and panning strategies may further enhance the likelihood and frequency of phage antibodies with increased tumor selectivity [34, 35]. Today, phage display libraries with higher diversity are available, potentially allowing the identification of an even more versatile spectrum of binding specificities [36, 37]. Additionally, panning with freshly isolated patient-derived malignant plasma cells might further increase the possibility to identify novel antibodies against myeloma cell surface structures with potent anti-tumor activity since at least some antigens, e.g. CD307/FcRH5, might be lost upon cultivation [38].
Serological identification of antigens by recombinant expression cloning (SEREX) and serological proteome analysis (SERPA) may also display interesting strategies to identify novel myeloma-associated antigens [39, 40], but the majority of the identified epitopes/proteins targeted by the antibodies in patient sera often belonged to intracellular rather than to cell surface expressed structures that are accessible for therapeutic antibodies [41].
Phage PIII-15, chosen for further development, showed strong reactivity with myeloma and Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines, and patient-derived malignant plasma cells, while no or marginal binding to PBMCs, isolated T lymphocytes, monocytes or granulocytes of healthy donors was observed. By using the human scFv sequence of PIII-15, TP15-Fc was generated as a scFv-Fc fusion protein with an ADCC-optimized human IgG1 Fc. Therapeutically used human IgG1 mAbs exert their anti-tumor functions either by Fab- or Fc-mediated direct or indirect effector mechanisms. The engagement of the patient's immune effector cells has been suggested to be important, as the affinity of the Fc domain for activating and inhibitory Fc receptors (FcR) on immune cells can correlate with their therapeutic efficacy [12, 13, 42]. In this respect, ADCC and ADCP are relevant mechanisms of action of human IgG1 mAbs that are subject to optimization attempts [14, 43, 44]. For instance, the S239D and I332E mutations, also integrated into the Fc domain of TP15-Fc, were reported to substantially enhance ADCC activity by improving the affinity for the activating FcγRIIIa [15]. Indeed, TP15-Fc was capable to induce potent ADCC with human PBMC and isolated NK cells against different plasma cell lines and patient-derived malignant plasma cells with EC50 values in the low nM range. Especially, NK cells are potent effector cells and represent a powerful cell population for anti-myeloma immunotherapy. Some IMiDs, i.e. thalidomide and lenalidomide, as part of the current myeloma treatment strategies, are known to stimulate NK cell activation and may augment anti-tumor activity of therapeutic mAbs or Fc-containing antibody-derived molecules via ADCC [45, 46]. For daratumumab and elotuzumab, the two anti-myeloma IgG1 mAbs that have been recently approved for MM therapy, ADCC activity has been described as important mechanism of action and high efficacy is seen in combination with PIs and IMiDs in myeloma patients [9, 47–49]. Although Fc-engineered mAbs directed against HM1.24 and CD40 showed potent pre-clinical activity, currently no ADCC-optimized antibodies are evaluated in clinical studies for MM therapy [20, 27].
Human ICAM-1/CD54 was identified as target antigen of TP15-Fc. ICAM-1 is a 90 kDa trans-membrane glycoprotein, consisting of five Ig-like extracellular domains and thus belonging to the Ig superfamily [50, 51]. Its expression is constitutively low on leukocytes, platelets, fibroblasts, endothelial and epithelial cells under non-inflammatory conditions, which is consistent with the binding pattern observed for TP15-Fc. Since ICAM-1 is an important adhesion molecule playing a key role in leukocyte extravasation during states of inflammation, it was also associated with metastatic progression of cancer [52]. In myeloma, overexpression of ICAM-1 was negatively correlated with patient survival, and ICAM-1-CD18 interactions seem to be involved in macrophage-induced drug resistance [53, 54]. The first ICAM-1 antibody tested against human tumor cells was UV3 developed by the group of Ellen Vitettta in 1993 [55]. Potent anti-tumor activity against different tumor entities, e.g. Burkitt's lymphoma, was observed for the mouse IgG2 antibody and the chimeric cUV3 in preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies [56–58]. Enlimomab (BIRR1/R6.5), another anti-human ICAM-1 antibody, was also tested in clinical trials to treat rheumatoid arthritis, prevent acute rejection of renal transplants and in acute stroke patients, and showed some clinical improvements for arthritis as well as stroke patients and importantly good tolerability [59, 60]. The first human anti-ICAM-1 IgG1 mAb BI-505 was recently evaluated in clinical trials for patients with relapsed/refractory MM and smoldering myeloma [61, 62]. Even though future clinical development was stopped, BI-505 was mostly well tolerated. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached up to 20 mg/kg while ICAM-1 epitopes on patients’ myeloma cells were saturated already at 10 mg/kg. Adverse events were mostly infusion-related and were in general mild to moderate [61]. Thus, pronounced toxicity of anti-ICAM-1 antibodies were not reported – suggesting a therapeutic window for TP15-Fc antibody therapy in myeloma.
As for TP15-Fc, also for UV3 and BI-505 Fc-mediated effects were reported to be crucial for their efficacy [57, 63]. For instance, potent macrophage-dependent anti-myeloma activity was described for BI-505 besides the induction of programmed cell death. In contrast, ADCC and the recruitment of human NK cells is most likely the major effector mechanism of TP15-Fc. These different modes of action may be due to different epitopes on ICAM-1/CD54 bound by the individual antibodies and may additionally rely on the mutations introduced in the Fc part of TP15-Fc to improve the FcγR binding of the molecule. Future studies are required to address if the expression pattern of ICAM-1/CD54 may cause higher toxicity if an Fc-engineered compared to a wild type mAb is used. Thus, we currently work on the generation of fully human IgG1 antibody variants with differentially modified Fc parts and on more advanced animal models (i.e. an orthotopic mouse model with fluorescent tumor cells) to address these questions. Furthermore, combination treatments with IMiDs and PIs will be tested since treatment regimen including these agents and a mAb proved to be very efficient in myeloma patients and led to the approval of daratumumab and elotuzumab. Since ICAM-1/CD54 is also believed to be important for the interaction of malignant plasma cells with the bone marrow microenvironment, we will define the exact binding epitope of TP15-Fc and investigate if there is an impact on the interaction with BMSC or other ligand-expressing cells and if this has a therapeutic impact.
In summary, phage display technology combined with a cellular panning strategy led to the identification of the novel human ICAM-1 antibody TP15-Fc. This antibody exerts its anti-myeloma activity by efficiently recruiting NK cells for ADCC. Although caution is required in translating observations from animal models into the clinical situation in man, the complete control of human myeloma cell growth in the SCID xenograft model is encouraging to further evaluate TP15-Fc for MM immunotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell separation
Mononuclear cells from myeloma patients as well as PBMC and granulocytes/PMN from healthy donors were isolated as described previously [16]. Samples were taken after receiving donors’ written informed consent. All experiments were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany.
NK cells, monocytes, B and T lymphocytes were enriched by negative selection using MACS technology (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Viability and purity had to be > 95% as verified by flow cytometry before use in experiments.
Culture of eukaryotic cells
Jurkat, Ramos, Raji, Daudi, and CHO-K1 cells were obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany), whereas ARH-77, CEM, HEL, HL-60, K562, KG-1a and RPMI-8226 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). SEM, L363, MM1.S, and U266 were kind gifts from J. Greil (Erlangen, Germany), V. Diehl (Cologne, Germany), Y.T. Tai (Boston, MA, USA) and K. Nilsson (Uppsala, Sweden), respectively. ARH-77, CEM, Daudi, HEL, Jurkat, K562, L363, MM1.S, Raji, RPMI-8226, U266 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640-Glutamax-I medium containing 10% FCS, 1% penicillin and streptomycin (R10+; all Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The human plasma cell lines INA-6, INA-6.Tu1 and JK-6L were established in our laboratory [30, 64]. JK-6L were cultivated in R10+, while INA-6 and INA-6.Tu1 were cultured in R10+ supplemented with 2.5 ng/ml recombinant human IL-6 (Life Technologies). Ramos cells were kept in RPMI 1640-Glutamax-I medium plus 20% FCS, penicillin and streptomycin. SEM, KG-1a and HL-60 were maintained in Iscove's MDM (Life Technologies) with 10% or 20% FCS and antibiotics. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were obtained from Lonza and kept in EGM-Plus medium (Lonza, Walkersville, MD, USA). Lenti-X 293T (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) and CHO-K1 cells were cultured in DMEM (Life Technologies) containing 10% FCS and antibiotics (D10+).
Transfection of CHO-K1 and Lenti-X 293T cells
To transiently transfect Lenti-X 293T cells with human (pCMV6-XL5 human ICAM-1 (untagged); NM_000201.1) or mouse ICAM-1 (pCMV6-AC-GFP mouse ICAM-1 (GFP-tagged); NM_010493.2; both OriGene Technologies, Rockville, MD, USA), Lipofectamine LTX (Life Technologies) transfections were performed according to manufacturer's instructions. Cells were maintained in D10+ for 72h prior flow cytometric analysis. Stable transfection of CHO-K1 cells was carried out as described in the supplements.
Panning of the phage display libraries
The two human synthetic scFv libraries Tomlinson I and J with a size of 1.47×108 and 1.37×108, respectively, were purchased from the MRC HGMP Resource Centre, Cambridge, UK. Phage stocks with 1012-1013 phages/ml were prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions and were utilized for panning. All cells and reaction tubes were pre-incubated with 2% (w/v) non-fat dry milk powder (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) in PBS (NM-PBS; Life Technologies) for at least 30 min. 5×1012 phages were incubated with intact cells for 2h on a roller incubator at 4°C. First the libraries were step-wise pre-absorbed with freshly isolated granulocytes and T lymphocytes from healthy individuals (50×106 cells each), then incubated with a mixture of 2.5×106 JK-6L cells and 50×106 T lymphocytes. Subsequently, T cells were eliminated with CD3 microbeads and LD depletion columns (Miltenyi Biotec). The CD3-negative fractions were stained with CD138-PE (Beckman Coulter, Krefeld, Germany) and CD3-FITC (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany; clone SK7) to sort the CD138+ plasma cells with a FACS Canto analyzer and Diva software (BD Biosciences). Phages bound to plasma cells were eluted with 1 mg/ml trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) in PBS for 10 min at RT and used to re-infect E. coli TG1. The protocol was followed as recommended for panning with a complex antigen and two additional rounds with 2.5×106 INA-6 (round 2) and JK-6L cells (round 3) were carried out. Phage precipitations were done with 20% polyethylene glycol 6000 in 2.5 M NaCl (PEG/NaCl; Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) prior titration and storage at 4°C.
Production of monoclonal phage antibodies
To isolate monoclonal phages, individual colonies were grown in 96-well-plates and infected with helper phage according to standard procedures. Bacteria were pelleted and supernatants were tested in whole-cell ELISA experiments. Monoclonal phages with desired binding properties were subsequently produced in 100 ml E. coli cultures followed by PEG/NaCl precipitation and titration.
Flow cytometric analyses
To analyze cell surface binding, 0.5×106 cells were incubated with 5×1010 phages or scFv-Fc fusion protein at the indicated concentration in PBS supplemented with 1% BSA and 0.1% NaN3 (PBA buffer; Sigma-Aldrich) on ice for 60 min. Bound phages were detected with an anti-fd bacteriophage antibody (Sigma-Aldrich), which had been labeled with DyLight 488 Microscale Antibody Labeling Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The scFv-Fc fusion proteins were detected with a Penta-His Alexa Fluor 488 Conjugate (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) or goat F(ab)2 anti-human Fcγ (IgG)-FITC and -PE (Beckman Coulter; final dilution for all 1/20 in PBA), respectively. Samples containing FcR carrying immune cells, e.g. NK cells and monocytes, were pre-incubated for 15 min with PBA buffer supplemented with human immunoglobulin (Intratect, Biotest Pharma, Dreieich, Germany) in a final concentration of 500 μg/ml to prevent unspecific binding of the scFv-Fc fusion proteins via their Fc domain. Subsequently, samples were directly stained with DyLight 488-labeled TP15-Fc or 4D5-Fc or indirectly stained with the Penta-His Alexa Fluor 488 Conjugate (Qiagen). All samples were measured on a Navios flow cytometer and analyzed with Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter).
Whole cell ELISA
96-well flat-bottom plates were blocked with NM-PBS prior incubation of 0.5×106 cells with 50-100 μl phage-containing E. coli TG1 supernatant or 5-25×1010 PEG/NaCl precipitated phages/well on a plate shaker for 1h at RT. Plates were washed five times with 0.1% NM-PBS prior incubation with an HRP-labeled anti-M13 antibody (GE Healthcare, Solingen, Germany) diluted 1/2000 in 1% NM-PBS. Plates were washed as described and 100 μl ABTS solution/well (Roche, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) was added. Absorbance (405/670 nm) was measured with a Spectra Rainbow Reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland).
ScFv-Fc fusion protein construction
To allow scFv fusion and cloning into the pSec-IgG1-Fc-prot-eng vector [65], the scFv sequence was amplified using primers LMB3 forward (5’ CAATTTCACACAGGAAACAGCTATGAC 3’) and NotI PspOMI reverse (5’ TTCGATCGGGCCCCCTGCGGCCGCCCGTTTGATTTCCACC 3’). PCR was performed with Pwo DNA Polymerase. The PCR product was extracted from agarose gel with NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-Up kit (Machery-Nagel, Dueren, Germany). Vector and PCR product were digested with SfiI/NotI and SfiI/PspOMI (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA), respectively, and cloned by using standard procedures. The amino acids exchanged in the Fc domain (S239D/I332E/A330L; ref. 15) enhance FcR binding and considerably reduce C1q binding of the resulting Fc-engineered scFv-Fc fusion protein TP15-Fc. The 4D5 scFv (anti-HER2) was used to design the control molecule 4D5-Fc [66]. Both fusion proteins contained a 6xHis-tag for purification and detection. The correct sequences of the final constructs were verified by Sanger sequencing.
Expression and purification of scFv-Fc fusion proteins
The recombinant proteins were expressed in Lenti-X 293T cells by calcium phosphate transfection and purified by affinity chromatography with protein A (GE Healthcare) and Ni-NTA beads (Qiagen). Gel filtration of the proteins were performed on an ÄKTA purifier system with Unicorn 5.1 software (GE Healthcare) using PBS as running buffer at a constant flow rate of 0.1 ml/min. 200 μg protein was loaded on a Superdex 200 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare). Ovalbumin and aldolase of the Gel Filtration HMW Calibration Kit (GE Healthcare) were used as molecular weight controls. Quantifications were done by capillary electrophoresis (Experion Pro260 kit; Bio-Rad). Purity and molecular masses of TP15-Fc and 4D5-Fc (5 μg protein each) were analyzed on Coomassie gel by using standard procedures.
Chromium release assay
ADCC and CDC were analyzed in standard 51Cr release assays as previously described [16]. Briefly, 5 000 target cells were incubated with the indicated molecules and the respective human effector cells or 50 μl human serum at 37°C for 3h. PBMC and human NK cells of healthy individuals were applied at E:T ratios of 80:1 and 10:1, respectively.
Animal model
TP15-Fc was tested in the INA-6.Tu1 xenograft model [30]. 8 weeks old female SCID/beige mice (Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany) were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 25×106 INA-6.Tu1 plasma cells 48h prior start of treatment. Groups of 5 or 10 mice were treated either with TP15-Fc, 4D5-Fc or vehicle control (PBS) twice weekly i.p. for a total of seven doses. Cumulative treatment dose was 1.15 mg scFv-Fc fusion protein/animal. The experiments were performed according to the animal experimental guidelines of the responsible local authorities and along with the German Animal Protection Law. Human IL-6 receptor/CD126 concentration in final mice sera was analyzed with CD126 ELISA kit (Diaclone, Besançon, France) according to the instructions.
Data processing and statistical analyses
Data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Curves were fitted using a nonlinear regression model with a sigmoidal dose response (variable slope). Group data are reported as mean ± SEM. Differences between groups were analyzed by one- or two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test or by Mann-Whitney two-tailed t-test. Survival curves were analyzed with log-rank test. Significance was accepted with p < 0.05.
Homology modeling
The homology model for TP15-Fc was calculated using YASARA Structure software (YASARA Biosciences, Vienna, Austria) after removing secretion leader and tags.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS FIGURES AND TABLE
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Anja Muskulus, Heidrun Bosse, Kathrin Richter, Anna Boettiger, Jan Brdon, Britta von Below, and Sandra Ussat for excellent technical assistance.
Abbreviations
- ADCC
antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity
- ADCP
antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis
- BM
bone marrow
- BMSC
bone marrow stromal cells
- CDC
complement-dependent cytotoxicity
- ELISA
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
- FcR
Fc receptor
- ICAM-1
intercellular adhesion molecule-1
- Ig
immunoglobulin
- IMiD
immunomodulatory drug
- mAb
monoclonal antibody
- MM
multiple myeloma
- PBMC
peripheral blood mononuclear cells
- PCL
plasma cell leukemia
- PI
proteasome inhibitor
- scFv
single-chain fragment variable
Footnotes
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interests.
GRANT SUPPORT
This study was supported by a research grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; PE 1425/2-1) to RB and MP, MP is supported by the Mildred-Scheel professorship program by the Deutsche Krebshilfe e. V., intramural funding from the Christian-Albrechts-University to CK, and a research grant from the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (2015_A166) to KK.
REFERENCES
- 1.Alexander DD, Mink PJ, Adami HO, Cole P, Mandel JS, Oken MM, Trichopoulos D. Multiple myeloma: a review of the epidemiologic literature. Int J Cancer. 2007;120:40–61. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1046–1060. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1011442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kumar SK, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Gertz MA, Buadi FK, Pandey S, Kapoor P, Dingli D, Hayman SR, Leung N, Lust J, McCurdy A, Russell SJ, et al. Continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma: changes in early mortality and outcomes in older patients. Leukemia. 2014;28:1122–1128. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Richardson PG, Lonial S, Jakubowiak AJ, Harousseau JL, Anderson KC. Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2011;154:745–754. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08790.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.van de Donk NW, Kamps S, Mutis T, Lokhorst HM. Monoclonal antibody-based therapy as a new treatment strategy in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2012;26:199–213. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mimura N, Hideshima T, Anderson KC. Novel therapeutic strategies for multiple myeloma. Exp Hematol. 2015;43:732–741. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2015.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lonial S, Durie B, Palumbo A, San-Miguel J. Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of multiple myeloma: current status and future perspectives. Leukemia. 2016;30:526–535. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lokhorst HM, Plesner T, Laubach JP, Nahi H, Gimsing P, Hansson M, Minnema MC, Lassen U, Krejcik J, Palumbo A, van de Donk NW, Ahmadi T, Khan I, et al. Targeting CD38 with daratumumab monotherapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1207–1219. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lonial S, Dimopoulos M, Palumbo A, White D, Grosicki S, Spicka I, Walter-Croneck A, Moreau P, Mateos MV, Magen H, Belch A, Reece D, Beksac M, et al. Elotuzumab therapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:621–631. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Scott AM, Wolchok JD, Old LJ. Antibody therapy of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:278–287. doi: 10.1038/nrc3236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Weiner LM, Murray JC, Shuptrine CW. Antibody-based immunotherapy of cancer. Cell. 2012;148:1081–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Beers SA, Glennie MJ, White AL. Influence of immunoglobulin isotype on therapeutic antibody function. Blood. 2016;127:1097–1101. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-09-625343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.van de Winkel JG. Fc receptors: role in biology and antibody therapy. Immunol Lett. 2010;128:4–5. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2009.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kellner C, Derer S, Valerius T, Peipp M. Boosting ADCC and CDC activity by Fc engineering and evaluation of antibody effector functions. Methods. 2014;65:105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lazar GA, Dang W, Karki S, Vafa O, Peng JS, Hyun L, Chan C, Chung HS, Eivazi A, Yoder SC, Vielmetter J, Carmichael DF, Hayes RJ, et al. Engineered antibody Fc variants with enhanced effector function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:4005–4010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508123103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Peipp M, Lammerts van Bueren JJ, Schneider-Merck T, Bleeker WW, Dechant M, Beyer T, Repp R, van Berkel PH, Vink T, van de Winkel JG, Parren PW, Valerius T. Antibody fucosylation differentially impacts cytotoxicity mediated by NK and PMN effector cells. Blood. 2008;112:2390–2399. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-03-144600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Beck A, Reichert JM. Marketing approval of mogamulizumab: a triumph for glyco-engineering. MAbs. 2012;4:419–425. doi: 10.4161/mabs.20996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee HZ, Miller BW, Kwitkowski VE, Ricci S, DelValle P, Saber H, Grillo J, Bullock J, Florian J, Mehrotra N, Ko CW, Nie L, Shapiro M, et al. Food and drug administration approval: obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil for the treatment of previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:3902–3907. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bowles JA, Wang SY, Link BK, Allan B, Beuerlein G, Campbell MA, Marquis D, Ondek B, Wooldridge JE, Smith BJ, Breitmeyer JB, Weiner GJ. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with enhanced affinity for CD16 activates NK cells at lower concentrations and more effectively than rituximab. Blood. 2006;108:2648–2654. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-020057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Horton HM, Bernett MJ, Peipp M, Pong E, Karki S, Chu SY, Richards JO, Chen H, Repp R, Desjarlais JR, Zhukovsky EA. Fc-engineered anti-CD40 antibody enhances multiple effector functions and exhibits potent in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity against hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2010;116:3004–3012. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-265280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kellner C, Zhukovsky EA, Potzke A, Bruggemann M, Schrauder A, Schrappe M, Kneba M, Repp R, Humpe A, Gramatzki M, Peipp M. The Fc-engineered CD19 antibody MOR208 (XmAb5574) induces natural killer cell-mediated lysis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells from pediatric and adult patients. Leukemia. 2013;27:1595–1598. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Romain G, Senyukov V, Rey-Villamizar N, Merouane A, Kelton W, Liadi I, Mahendra A, Charab W, Georgiou G, Roysam B, Lee DA, Varadarajan N. Antibody Fc engineering improves frequency and promotes kinetic boosting of serial killing mediated by NK cells. Blood. 2014;124:3241–3249. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-04-569061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rueff J, Medinger M, Heim D, Passweg J, Stern M. Lymphocyte subset recovery and outcome after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for plasma cell myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20:896–899. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dosani T, Carlsten M, Maric I, Landgren O. The cellular immune system in myelomagenesis: NK cells and T cells in the development of myeloma and their uses in immunotherapies. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5:e306. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2015.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.van der Veer MS, de Weers M, van Kessel B, Bakker JM, Wittebol S, Parren PW, Lokhorst HM, Mutis T. Towards effective immunotherapy of myeloma: enhanced elimination of myeloma cells by combination of lenalidomide with the human CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab. Haematologica. 2011;96:284–290. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.030759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lagrue K, Carisey A, Morgan DJ, Chopra R, Davis DM. Lenalidomide augments actin remodeling and lowers NK-cell activation thresholds. Blood. 2015;126:50–60. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-625004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tai YT, Horton HM, Kong SY, Pong E, Chen H, Cemerski S, Bernett MJ, Nguyen DH, Karki S, Chu SY, Lazar GA, Munshi NC, Desjarlais JR, et al. Potent in vitro and in vivo activity of an Fc-engineered humanized anti-HM1.24 antibody against multiple myeloma via augmented effector function. Blood. 2012;119:2074–2082. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-364521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kawano Y, Moschetta M, Manier S, Glavey S, Gorgun GT, Roccaro AM, Anderson KC, Ghobrial IM. Targeting the bone marrow microenvironment in multiple myeloma. Immunol Rev. 2015;263:160–172. doi: 10.1111/imr.12233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Terpos E, Migkou M, Christoulas D, Gavriatopoulou M, Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou E, Kanellias N, Iakovaki M, Panagiotidis I, Ziogas DC, Fotiou D, Kastritis E, Dimopoulos MA. Increased circulating VCAM-1 correlates with advanced disease and poor survival in patients with multiple myeloma: reduction by post-bortezomib and lenalidomide treatment. Blood Cancer J. 2016;6:e428. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2016.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Burger R, Guenther A, Bakker F, Schmalzing M, Bernand S, Baum W, Duerr B, Hocke GM, Steininger H, Gebhart E, Gramatzki M. Gp130 and ras mediated signaling in human plasma cell line INA-6: a cytokine-regulated tumor model for plasmacytoma. Hematol J. 2001;2:42–53. doi: 10.1038/sj.thj.6200075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lekkerkerker A, Logtenberg T. Phage antibodies against human dendritic cell subpopulations obtained by flow cytometry-based selection on freshly isolated cells. J Immunol Methods. 1999;231:53–63. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(99)00140-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Popkov M, Rader C, Barbas CF. Isolation of human prostate cancer cell reactive antibodies using phage display technology. J Immunol Methods. 2004;291:137–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2004.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ridgway JB, Ng E, Kern JA, Lee J, Brush J, Goddard A, Carter P. Identification of a human anti-CD55 single-chain Fv by subtractive panning of a phage library using tumor and nontumor cell lines. Cancer Res. 1999;59:2718–2723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hoogenboom HR. Selecting and screening recombinant antibody libraries. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:1105–1116. doi: 10.1038/nbt1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Siva AC, Kirkland RE, Lin B, Maruyama T, McWhirter J, Yantiri-Wernimont F, Bowdish KS, Xin H. Selection of anti-cancer antibodies from combinatorial libraries by whole-cell panning and stringent subtraction with human blood cells. J Immunol Methods. 2008;330:109–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2007.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Prassler J, Thiel S, Pracht C, Polzer A, Peters S, Bauer M, Norenberg S, Stark Y, Kolln J, Popp A, Urlinger S, Enzelberger M. HuCAL PLATINUM, a synthetic Fab library optimized for sequence diversity and superior performance in mammalian expression systems. J Mol Biol. 2011;413:261–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kugler J, Wilke S, Meier D, Tomszak F, Frenzel A, Schirrmann T, Dubel S, Garritsen H, Hock B, Toleikis L, Schutte M, Hust M. Generation and analysis of the improved human HAL9/10 antibody phage display libraries. BMC Biotechnol. 2015;15:10. doi: 10.1186/s12896-015-0125-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hatzivassiliou G, Miller I, Takizawa J, Palanisamy N, Rao PH, Iida S, Tagawa S, Taniwaki M, Russo J, Neri A, Cattoretti G, Clynes R, Mendelsohn C, et al. IRTA1 and IRTA2, novel immunoglobulin superfamily receptors expressed in B cells and involved in chromosome 1q21 abnormalities in B cell malignancy. Immunity. 2001;14:277–289. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00109-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhou FL, Zhang WG, Chen G, Zhao WH, Cao XM, Chen YX, Tian W, Liu J, Liu SH. Serological identification and bioinformatics analysis of immunogenic antigens in multiple myeloma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2006;55:910–917. doi: 10.1007/s00262-005-0074-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rahlff J, Trusch M, Haag F, Bacher U, Horst A, Schluter H, Binder M. Antigen-specificity of oligoclonal abnormal protein bands in multiple myeloma after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012;61:1639–1651. doi: 10.1007/s00262-012-1220-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schieferdecker A, Oberle A, Thiele B, Hofmann F, Gothel M, Miethe S, Hust M, Braig F, Voigt M, von Pein UM, Koch-Nolte F, Haag F, Alawi M, et al. A transplant "immunome" screening platform defines a targetable epitope fingerprint of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016;127:3202–3214. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-10-676536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV. Antibodies, Fc receptors and cancer. Curr Opin Immunol. 2007;19:239–245. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2007.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Carter PJ. Potent antibody therapeutics by design. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:343–357. doi: 10.1038/nri1837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Desjarlais JR, Lazar GA, Zhukovsky EA, Chu SY. Optimizing engagement of the immune system by anti-tumor antibodies: an engineer's perspective. Drug Discov Today. 2007;12:898–910. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hayashi T, Hideshima T, Akiyama M, Podar K, Yasui H, Raje N, Kumar S, Chauhan D, Treon SP, Richardson P, Anderson KC. Molecular mechanisms whereby immunomodulatory drugs activate natural killer cells: clinical application. Br J Haematol. 2005;128:192–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05286.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Engelhardt M, Terpos E, Kleber M, Gay F, Wasch R, Morgan G, Cavo M, van de Donk N, Beilhack A, Bruno B, Johnsen HE, Hajek R, Driessen C, et al. European Myeloma Network recommendations on the evaluation and treatment of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2014;99:232–242. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.099358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.de Weers M, Tai YT, van der Veer MS, Bakker JM, Vink T, Jacobs DC, Oomen LA, Peipp M, Valerius T, Slootstra JW, Mutis T, Bleeker WK, Anderson KC, et al. Daratumumab, a novel therapeutic human CD38 monoclonal antibody, induces killing of multiple myeloma and other hematological tumors. J Immunol. 2011;186:1840–1848. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tai YT, Dillon M, Song W, Leiba M, Li XF, Burger P, Lee AI, Podar K, Hideshima T, Rice AG, van Abbema A, Jesaitis L, Caras I, et al. Anti-CS1 humanized monoclonal antibody HuLuc63 inhibits myeloma cell adhesion and induces antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in the bone marrow milieu. Blood. 2008;112:1329–1337. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-107292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Plesner T, Arkenau HT, Lokhorst HM, Gimsing P, Krejcik J, Lemech C, Minnema MC, Lassen U, Laubach JP, Ahmadi T, Yeh H, Guckert ME, Feng H, et al. Safety and efficacy of daratumumab with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed or relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2014;124:84. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rothlein R, Dustin ML, Marlin SD, Springer TA. A human intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1) distinct from LFA-1. J Immunol. 1986;137:1270–1274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Staunton DE, Marlin SD, Stratowa C, Dustin ML, Springer TA. Primary structure of ICAM-1 demonstrates interaction between members of the immunoglobulin and integrin supergene families. Cell. 1988;52:925–933. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90434-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Schmidmaier R, Baumann P. ANTI-ADHESION evolves to a promising therapeutic concept in oncology. Curr Med Chem. 2008;15:978–990. doi: 10.2174/092986708784049667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sampaio MS, Vettore AL, Yamamoto M, Chauffaille ML, Zago MA, Colleoni GW. Expression of eight genes of nuclear factor-kappa B pathway in multiple myeloma using bone marrow aspirates obtained at diagnosis. Histol Histopathol. 2009;24:991–997. doi: 10.14670/HH-24.991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zheng Y, Yang J, Qian J, Qiu P, Hanabuchi S, Lu Y, Wang Z, Liu Z, Li H, He J, Lin P, Weber D, Davis RE, et al. PSGL-1/selectin and ICAM-1/CD18 interactions are involved in macrophage-induced drug resistance in myeloma. Leukemia. 2013;27:702–710. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Huang YW, Burrows FJ, Vitetta ES. Cytotoxicity of a novel anti-ICAM-1 immunotoxin on human myeloma cell lines. Hybridoma. 1993;12:661–675. doi: 10.1089/hyb.1993.12.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Huang YW, Richardson JA, Vitetta ES. Anti-CD54 (ICAM-1) has antitumor activity in SCID mice with human myeloma cells. Cancer Res. 1995;55:610–616. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Coleman EJ, Brooks KJ, Smallshaw JE, Vitetta ES. The Fc portion of UV3, an anti-CD54 monoclonal antibody, is critical for its antitumor activity in SCID mice with human multiple myeloma or lymphoma cell lines. J Immunother. 2006;29:489–498. doi: 10.1097/01.cji.0000210079.52554.c3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Brooks KJ, Coleman EJ, Vitetta ES. The antitumor activity of an anti-CD54 antibody in SCID mice xenografted with human breast, prostate, non-small cell lung, and pancreatic tumor cell lines. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:2438–2445. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kavanaugh AF, Davis LS, Jain RI, Nichols LA, Norris SH, Lipsky PE. A phase I/II open label study of the safety and efficacy of an anti-ICAM-1 (intercellular adhesion molecule-1; CD54) monoclonal antibody in early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1996;23:1338–1344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Schneider D, Berrouschot J, Brandt T, Hacke W, Ferbert A, Norris SH, Polmar SH, Schafer E. Safety, pharmacokinetics and biological activity of enlimomab (anti-ICAM-1 antibody): an open-label, dose escalation study in patients hospitalized for acute stroke. Eur Neurol. 1998;40:78–83. doi: 10.1159/000007962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hansson M, Gimsing P, Badros A, Niskanen TM, Nahi H, Offner F, Salomo M, Sonesson E, Mau-Sorensen M, Stenberg Y, Sundberg A, Teige I, Van Droogenbroeck J, et al. A phase I dose-escalation study of antibody BI-505 in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:2730–2736. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wichert S, Juliusson G, Johansson A, Sonesson E, Teige I, Wickenberg AT, Frendeus B, Korsgren M, Hansson M. A single-arm, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial evaluating disease response following treatment with BI-505, a human anti-intercellular adhesion molecule-1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with smoldering multiple myeloma. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0171205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Veitonmaki N, Hansson M, Zhan F, Sundberg A, Lofstedt T, Ljungars A, Li ZC, Martinsson-Niskanen T, Zeng M, Yang Y, Danielsson L, Kovacek M, Lundqvist A, et al. A human ICAM-1 antibody isolated by a function-first approach has potent macrophage-dependent antimyeloma activity in vivo. Cancer Cell. 2013;23:502–515. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Meister S, Schubert U, Neubert K, Herrmann K, Burger R, Gramatzki M, Hahn S, Schreiber S, Wilhelm S, Herrmann M, Jack HM, Voll RE. Extensive immunoglobulin production sensitizes myeloma cells for proteasome inhibition. Cancer Res. 2007;67:1783–1792. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Repp R, Kellner C, Muskulus A, Staudinger M, Nodehi SM, Glorius P, Akramiene D, Dechant M, Fey GH, van Berkel PH, van de Winkel JG, Parren PW, Valerius T, et al. Combined Fc-protein- and Fc-glyco-engineering of scFv-Fc fusion proteins synergistically enhances CD16a binding but does not further enhance NK-cell mediated ADCC. J Immunol Methods. 2011;373:67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2011.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Glorius P, Baerenwaldt A, Kellner C, Staudinger M, Dechant M, Stauch M, Beurskens FJ, Parren PW, Winkel JG, Valerius T, Humpe A, Repp R, Gramatzki M, et al. The novel tribody [(CD20)xCD16] efficiently triggers effector cell-mediated lysis of malignant B cells. Leukemia. 2013;27:190–201. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.