Abstract
Previous studies have identified the odd-skipped related 2 (Osr2) transcription factor as a key intrinsic regulator of palatal shelf growth and morphogenesis. However, little is known about the molecular program acting downstream of Osr2 in the regulation of palatogenesis. In this study, we isolated palatal mesenchyme cells from embryonic day 12.5 (E12.5) and E13.5 Osr2RFP/+ and Osr2RFP/- mutant mouse embryos and performed whole transcriptome RNA sequencing analyses. Differential expression analysis of the RNA sequencing datasets revealed that expression of 70 genes was upregulated and expression of 61 genes was downregulated by >1.5-fold at both E12.5 and E13.5 in the Osr2RFP/- palatal mesenchyme cells, in comparison with Osr2RFP/+ littermates. Gene ontology analysis revealed enrichment of signaling molecules and transcription factors crucial for skeletal development and osteoblast differentiation among those significantly upregulated in the Osr2 mutant palatal mesenchyme. Using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)and in situ hybridization assays, we validated that the Osr2-/- embryos exhibit significantly increased and expanded expression of many osteogenic pathway genes, including Bmp3, Bmp5, Bmp7, Mef2c, Sox6, and Sp7 in the developing palatal mesenchyme. Furthermore, we demonstrate that expression of Sema3a, Sema3d, and Sema3e, is ectopically activated in the developing palatal mesenchyme in Osr2-/- embryos. Through chromatin immunoprecipitation, followed by RT-PCR analysis, we demonstrate that endogenous Osr2 protein binds to the promoter regions of the Sema3a and Sema3d genes in the embryonic palatal mesenchyme. Moreover, Osr2 expression repressed the transcription from the Sema3a and Sema3d promoters in cotransfected cells. Since the Sema3 subfamily of signaling molecules plays diverse roles in the regulation of cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation, these data reveal a novel role for Osr2 in regulation of palatal morphogenesis through preventing aberrant activation of Sema3 signaling. Together, these data indicate that Osr2 controls multiple molecular pathways, including BMP and Sema3 signaling, in palate development.
Keywords: cleft palate, craniofacial biology, gene expression, morphogenesis, osteogenesis, signal transduction
Introduction
Cleft palate affects about 1 in 1,000 live births worldwide and is one of the most common structural birth defects in humans (Dixon et al. 2011). Although genetic and genome-wide association studies of human populations, as well as genetic and developmental biology studies in animal models, have identified a large number of genes associated with cleft palate formation, the molecular mechanisms regulating palate development are still not well understood (Dixon et al. 2011; Bush and Jiang 2012; Funato et al. 2015; Lan et al. 2015). In particular, whereas tissue-specific genetic studies have shown that many signaling pathways and transcription factors play crucial roles in palatal shelf growth and patterning (Bush and Jiang 2012; Lane and Kaartinen 2014; Lan et al. 2015), little is known about the transcriptional regulatory networks functioning in the signaling pathways and the cellular processes during palatogenesis.
Through developmental gene expression screening and targeted mutagenesis studies in mice, we previously identified the odd-skipped related 2 (Osr2) transcription factor as a key regulator of palatal shelf growth and patterning (Lan et al. 2001; Lan et al. 2004). During mouse embryogenesis, Osr2 mRNA expression is specifically activated in the palatal mesenchyme at the onset of palatal shelf outgrowth (Lan et al. 2001; Lan et al. 2004). As palatal shelves grow vertically along the sides of the developing tongue, expression of Osr2 mRNAs exhibits a lateral-to-medial gradient in the palatal mesenchyme (Lan et al. 2004). Mice lacking Osr2 exhibit cleft palate due to impaired palatal mesenchyme proliferation and delay in palatal shelf elevation (Lan et al. 2004). Although no pathogenic mutation in OSR2 has been reported in cleft palate patients, the human OSR2 gene is located at chromosome 8q23, a region strongly associated with nonsyndromic orofacial clefting (Prescott et al. 2000). Moreover, mice with palatal mesenchyme-specific inactivation of Smoothened, which encodes an obligatory transducer of hedgehog signaling, exhibit loss of Osr2 expression in the palatal mesenchyme and significant reduction in palatal mesenchyme proliferation, suggesting that Osr2 acts downstream of hedgehog signaling to control palatal shelf growth (Lan and Jiang 2009). Furthermore, mice lacking the Pax9 transcription factor exhibit cleft palate due to defects in palatal mesenchyme proliferation and failure of palatal shelf elevation (Peters et al. 1998; Zhou et al. 2013). Pax9 function is required for maintenance of Osr2 expression in the palatal mesenchyme and for restoration of Osr2 expression in the palatal mesenchyme partly rescued palatogenesis in the absence of Pax9 function (Zhou et al. 2013), indicating that Osr2 is an important mediator of Pax9 regulation of palate development. Recently, Almaidhan et al. (2014) showed that mice with neural crest–specific deletion of Ldb1—which encodes LIM domain–binding protein-1 that can interact with multiple LIM domain–containing transcription factors—exhibit defects in palatal shelf growth and elevation, accompanied by aberrant upregulation of Osr2 expression in the palatal mesenchyme. Together, these studies indicate that multiple molecular pathways converge on the regulation of Osr2 expression during palate development. However, little is known about the target genes that mediate Osr2 function in palate development.
In this study, we used fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to isolate developing palatal mesenchyme from Osr2 heterozygous and homozygous mutant mouse embryos and performed RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analyses. Gene ontology analysis of Osr2-dependent gene expression profiles identified a major role for Osr2 in suppressing osteogenic differentiation of the palatal mesenchyme. Moreover, we found that Osr2 directly represses expression of several members of the class 3 semaphorins in the developing palatal mesenchyme. These results provide novel insight into the molecular mechanisms involving Osr2 in palate development.
Materials and Methods
Mouse Strains
The Osr2+/- (Osr2tm1Jian/+), Osr2RFP/+, Osr2Myc-Osr2AKi/+ mice have been described (Lan et al. 2004; Gao et al. 2009; Xu et al. 2016). Osr2+/- and Osr2RFP/+ mice were maintained by crossing to C57BL/6J inbred mice. Osr2Myc-Osr2AKi/Myc-Osr2AKi mice were maintained by intercrossing males and females in the stock background. For timed pregnancies, embryonic day 0.5 (E0.5) was defined as noon of the day that a vaginal plug was identified. This study was performed in accordance with the recommendations in the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” by the National Institutes of Health. The animal use protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (permit IACUC2016-0095). This study conformed with ARRIVE guidelines for preclinical animal studies.
Isolation of Palatal Mesenchyme with FACS
The palatal shelves of E12.5 and E13.5 Osr2RFP/+ and Osr2RFP/- embryos were manually microdissected in cold sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and digested with trypsin-EDTA (Invitrogen) at 37 °C for 4 min. After inactivation of trypsin with Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), cells were dissociated by pipetting. The dissociated cells were suspended in PBS with 2% FBS and 10mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and filtered through a 40-μm nylon cell strainer (352340; BD Falcon). Red fluorescent protein (RFP)–positive cells were isolated with BD FACSAria II and immediately processed for total RNA isolation.
RNA-Seq and Data Analysis
Total RNAs were extracted from FACS-isolated palatal mesenchyme cells with the Qiagen RNeasy Micro Kit (74004; Qiagen). Sequencing libraries were generated with Illumina Nextera DNA Sample Prep Kit and sequenced with Illumina HiSeq 2000. Sequence reads were mapped to the reference mouse genome (mm9) with Bowtie. RNA-seq data were analyzed with Strand NGS software, with the FPKM value (fragments per kilobase exon per million mapped sequences) calculated for each RefSeq gene. For analyses of differential expression, the fold change cutoff was set at ≥1.5-fold, and P values <0.01 from the Audic-Claverie test were considered statistically significant, with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate multiple testing correction (Brunskill and Potter 2012). Functional annotation analysis was carried out with online tools at https://toppgene.cchmc.org, as previously described (Chen et al. 2009). The RNA-seq data of this study have been deposited into the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus database (accession GSE95638).
Quantitative RT-PCR
First-strand cDNAs were synthesized with the SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System (11904-018; Invitrogen). Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed with a Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time System with conditions recommended by the manufacturer. Each reaction was performed at least in triplicates. The quantity of each mRNA was first determined with a standard curve method and normalized to the level of Hprt mRNAs. The sequences of primers used for the quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) are listed in Appendix Table 1.
In Situ Hybridization
Whole mount and section in situ hybridization was performed as previously described (Zhang et al. 1999). At least 3 embryos of each genotype were hybridized to each probe, and only probes that detected consistent patterns of expression in all samples were considered valid results.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
The palatal shelves were microdissected from E13.5 Osr2Myc-Osr2AKi homozygous embryos and crosslinked with 1.5% paraformaldehyde in crosslinking buffer (10mM NaCl, 0.1mM EDTA, 0.05mM egtazic acid [EGTA], 5mM hydroxyethyl piperazineethanesulfonic acid [HEPES], pH 8.0) at 37 °C for 45 min with constant shaking. Glycine was added to a final concentration of 125mM and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min to stop crosslinking. After washing with ice-cold PBS, cells were transferred into 1 mL of precooled lysis buffer (50mM HEPES, pH7.5, 0.14M NaCl, 1mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 0.5% NP40, 0.25% Triton X-100) with protease inhibitors (SC-24948; Santa Cruz) and incubated at 4 °C for 10 min to release the cell nuclei. The sample was centrifuged at 3,600 rpm for 5 min. The cell nuclei pellet was suspended in buffer 2 (0.2M NaCl, 1mM EDTA, 0.5mM EGTA, 10mM Tris, pH 8.0), incubated at 4 °C for 5 min, and centrifuged at 3,600 rpm for 5 min. The pellet was then resuspended in buffer 3 (1mM EDTA, 0.5mM EGTA, 10mM Tris, pH 8.0), containing protease inhibitors, and sonicated 8 times at 30 s each, with 1-min intervals, on ice. Chromatin fragments were isolated by centrifuging at 8,000 rpm for 5 min. The chromatin solution was incubated with anti-c-MYC monoclonal antibody (clone 4A6, 16-219; Millipore) for 2 h at 4 °C, followed by addition of protein G–conjugated Dynabeads and rotation overnight at 4 °C. The Dynabeads were washed 5 times with radio immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (1% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1mM EDTA, 50mM HEPES pH 7.5, 0.5M LiCl). DNA was isolated from the immunoprecipitated complex, eluted in 150 μL of elution buffer (50mM Tris pH 8.0, 10mM EDTA, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]), and amplified by real-time PCR with specific primers flanking candidate Osr2 binding sites.
Cell Culture, Transfection, and Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay
NIH/3T3 cells (CRL-1658; ATCC) were cultured in high-glucose Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium containing 10% FBS, penicillin (100 IU/mL), and streptomycin (100 μg/mL; Invitrogen) in 48-well plates and transfected with 1 μL of Lipofectamine 3000 Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for each well, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each luciferase reporter construct (0.4 μg each: pGL3-Sema3a-3k, pGL3-Sema3d-3k, pGL3-Sema3e-3k) was transfected with or without 0.2 μg of pCMV-3XFLAG-Osr2 expression vector (Zhou et al. 2011) and 10 ng of pRL-TK plasmid (internal control). Luciferase activities of firefly and Renilla were measured 48 h after transfection with the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega). Data were collected from at least 3 independent replicate assays.
Results
Effects of Loss of Osr2 Function on Palatal Mesenchyme Gene Expression
To gain a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms mediating Osr2 function in palate development, we performed RNA-seq analysis of transcriptome expression profiles of the developing palatal mesenchyme in Osr2-/- and control littermates. As we have shown previously, mice carrying the Osr2RFP knockin/knockout allele express the RFP reporter in all Osr2-expressing cells, including embryonic palatal shelf mesenchyme (Xu et al. 2016). We crossed Osr2RFP/+ male mice with Osr2+/- female mice—which carry a lacZ reporter cassette replacing the coding region of the Osr2 gene (Lan et al. 2004)—microdissected palatal shelves from Osr2RFP/+ and Osr2RFP/- embryos at E12.5 and E13.5, respectively, and processed for FACS isolation of RFP-positive cells from each embryo. RNA-seq analyses were carried for 1 pair of E12.5 and 2 pairs of E13.5 embryos. Differential expression analysis of the RNA-seq data sets identified 280 genes, in addition to Osr2 itself, the expression of which was up- or downregulated by >1.5-fold in the Osr2RFP/- palatal mesenchyme in comparison with the Osr2RFP/+ littermates, in which 70 genes were upregulated in E12.5 and E13.5 Osr2RFP/- mutant palatal mesenchyme, whereas 61 genes were downregulated in E12.5 and E13.5 Osr2RFP/- mutant palatal mesenchyme (Fig. 1A, Appendix Tables 2 and 3). We performed RT-qPCR analyses and verified that a number of signaling molecules and transcription factors important for the regulation of osteoblast differentiation or ossification—including Bmp3, Bmp5, Bmp7, Dlx5, Mef2c, Runx2, Runx3, Sox6, and Sp7—are upregulated by ≥2-fold in the palatal mesenchyme in Osr2RFP/- mutant embryos in comparison with the Osr2RFP/+ control littermates (Fig. 1C). The significant downregulation of several genes in the palatal mesenchyme in Osr2RFP/- mutant embryos, including Igf1, Lhx8, Osr1, and Pcdh17, was also validated by RT-qPCR analyses (Appendix Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
Effects of loss of Osr2 function on palatal mesenchyme gene expression profiles revealed by RNA sequencing and RT-qPCR analyses. (A) Venn diagrams comparing genes whose expression was significantly up- or downregulated by at least 1.5-fold in the palatal mesenchyme in Osr2RFP/- embryos as compared with Osr2RFP/+ embryos at embryonic day (E) 12.5 and E13.5. (B) Gene ontology (GO) analysis of the biological processes affected by the differentially expressed genes. (C) RT-qPCR validation of differential expression of select osteogenic pathway genes in E13.5 palatal mesenchyme cells in Osr2RFP/- embryos in comparison with Osr2RFP/+ embryos. The level of expression of each gene in the Osr2RFP/+ samples is set at 1 for direct visualization of fold increase of expression in the Osr2RFP/- samples. Error bars indicates standard error of the mean.
Validation of Osr2-Dependent Gene Expression in the Developing Palatal Mesenchyme with In Situ Hybridization
To further validate effects of loss of Osr2 function on palatal mesenchyme gene expression, we compared patterns of expression of select differentially expressed genes in the Osr2RFP/+ and Osr2RFP/- embryonic palatal shelves by whole mount and section in situ hybridization. Bmp3, Bmp5, and Bmp7 are expressed in distinct patterns along the anterior-posterior axis of the developing palatal shelves in wild-type embryos at E13.5, with Bmp3 mRNAs expressed in the medial region of posterior palatal mesenchyme (Fig. 2A, C, E, G), Bmp5 mRNAs preferentially expressed in the lateral side of anterior palatal mesenchyme (Fig. 2I, K, M, O), and Bmp7 mRNAs strongly expressed throughout palatal epithelium (Fig. 2Q, S, U, W). In E13.5 Osr2-/- mutant embryos, expression of Bmp3 mRNAs is ectopically activated in the distal palatal mesenchyme in the anterior and middle regions of the palatal shelves (Fig. 2B, D, F), expression of Bmp5 mRNAs is expanded to the middle and posterior regions of palatal mesenchyme (Fig. 2J, L, N, P), whereas expression of Bmp7 mRNAs is increased in subepithelial regions of the palatal mesenchyme throughout the anterior-posterior axis (Fig. 2R, T, V, X). These results indicate that, although Bmp3, Bmp5, and Bmp7 are differentially regulated during palate development, Osr2 plays an important role in regulating expression of each in the developing palatal mesenchyme.
Figure 2.
Comparison of patterns of expression of Bmp3, Bmp5, and Bmp7 mRNAs in the palatal tissues in E13.5 Osr2-/- mutant and wild-type embryos with whole mount and section in situ hybridization. Whole mount images (top row) show oral views of the palatal shelves, whereas the “anterior,” “middle,” and “posterior” rows show coronal sections from regions of the palatal shelves. (A–H) Expression patterns of Bmp3 mRNAs. (I–P) Expression patterns of Bmp5 mRNAs. (Q–X) Expression patterns of Bmp7 mRNAs. Arrows point to regions of differential expression. p, palatal shelf; t, tongue. Scale bars, 100 μm.
Comparative analysis of expression of genes associated with osteogenic differentiation, including Aspn, Mef2c, Sox6, and Sp7, confirmed that expression domain of each of these genes is expanded in the Osr2-/- palatal mesenchyme in comparison with their wildtype littermates at E13.5 (Fig. 3). These data, with the previous finding that the Osr2-/- embryos exhibit reduced palatal mesenchyme proliferation (Lan et al. 2004), suggest that Osr2 regulates palate development in part through preventing premature osteogenic differentiation of palatal mesenchyme.
Figure 3.
Comparison of patterns of expression of Aspn, Mef2c, Sox6, and Sp7 mRNAs in embryonic day 13.5 Osr2-/- mutant and wild-type embryos by whole mount and section in situ hybridization. Whole mount images show oral views of the palatal shelves, whereas the “middle” rows show coronal sections from the middle region of the palatal shelves. (A–D) Expression patterns of Aspn mRNAs. (E–H) Expression patterns of Mef2c mRNAs. (I–L) Expression patterns of Sox6 mRNAs. (M–P) Expression patterns of Sp7 mRNAs. Arrows point to regions of differential expression. p, palatal shelf; t, tongue. Scale bars, 100 μm.
Osr2 Binds to the Promoter Regions and Negatively Regulates Expression of the Sema3a and Sema3d Genes in the Developing Palatal Mesenchyme
From differential expression analysis of the RNA-seq data sets, we found that 3 structurally homologous and physically linked genes encoding members of class 3 semaphorins, Sema3a, Sema3d, and Sema3e (Ryynanen et al. 2017), were each significantly upregulated in the Osr2RFP/- mutant palatal mesenchyme in comparison with that in the Osr2RFP/+ littermates. RT-qPCR analyses validated significant upregulation of expression of each of these genes in Osr2RFP/- palatal mesenchyme (Fig. 1C). In situ hybridization analysis revealed that expression of Sema3a and Sema3d mRNAs were dramatically upregulated in the middle and posterior regions of palatal shelf mesenchyme in Osr2-/- embryos in comparison with wild-type littermates at E13.5 (Fig. 4A–P). Whereas Sema3e mRNA expression was restricted to the medial side of anterior palatal mesenchyme in E13.5 wild-type embryos (Fig. 4Q, S, U, W), it was upregulated in the anterior and posterior, but not in the middle regions of palatal mesenchyme in Osr2-/- embryos (Fig. 4R, T, V, X).
Figure 4.
Comparison of patterns of expression of Sema3a, Sema3d, and Sema3e mRNAs in embryonic day 13.5 Osr2-/- mutant and wild-type embryos. Whole mount images (top row) show oral views of the palatal shelves, whereas the “anterior,” “middle,” and “posterior” rows show coronal sections from regions of the palatal shelves. (A–H) Expression patterns of Sema3a mRNAs. (I–P) Expression patterns of Sema3d mRNAs. (Q–X) Expression patterns of Sema3e mRNAs. Arrows point to regions of differential expression. p, palatal shelf; t, tongue. Scale bar, 100 μm.
The class 3 semaphorins are secreted proteins and function through binding to receptor complexes consisting of neuropilins and plexins (reviewed by Valdembri et al. 2016). Nrp1, Nrp2, and Plexin1 were expressed at relatively low levels throughout the palatal mesenchyme at E13.5 (Appendix Fig. 2). RNA-seq and RT-qPCR analyses showed that expression of Nrp2 mRNAs was upregulated in Osr2 mutant palatal mesenchyme at E13.5 in comparison with control embryos (Appendix Fig. 2, Appendix Table 1). In addition, Sema3e has been shown to bind to PlexinD1 to regulate vascular pattern in a neuropilin-independent manner (Gu et al. 2005). We found that PlexinD1 mRNAs were highly expressed in endothelial cells in the palatal shelves in both control and Osr2 mutant embryos (Appendix Fig. 2M–P). Thus, increased expression of the Sema3 ligands in Osr2 mutant palatal mesenchyme might affect palate development directly through signaling to palatal mesenchyme cells or indirectly through regulating the vasculature.
We next examined the promoter sequences of each of these Sema3 genes and found that each contains several sites matching the previously determined Osr2-binding core sequence, GCTAC(T/C)GT (Kawai et al. 2007; Badis et al. 2009; Fig. 5A). To test if Osr2 is able to repress the promoter activity of these genes, we constructed luciferase reporter vectors containing 3 kb of genomic sequence immediately upstream of the transcriptional start site of these genes and performed cotransfection assays with an Osr2 expression vector in NIH/3T3 cells. As shown in Figure 5B, luciferase reporter expression driven by the Sema3a and Sema3d promoters, respectively, was significantly suppressed by Osr2 coexpression, whereas luciferase expression from the Sema3e promoter was not significantly affected.
Figure 5.
Osr2 binds to the promoter regions of Sema3a and Sema3d genes in the developing palatal mesenchyme and represses luciferase reporter gene expression driven by these promoters. (A) Diagram of putative Osr2-binding sites in the promoter regions of Sema3a, Sema3d, and Sema3e. (B) Coexpression of Osr2 repressed activity of Sema3a and Sema3d, but not Sema3e, promoters in cotransfected NIH/3T3 cells. (C) ChIP-qPCR analyses revealed enrichment of Osr2-binding to specific sites in the Sema3a and Sema3d promoter sequences. OBS, Osr2-binding site (2, 5, 6, 7 correspond to the putative sites marked in panel A). Error bars indicates standard error of the mean.
To verify that Osr2 directly regulates expression of the Sema3a and Sema3d genes in developing palatal mesenchyme in vivo, we took advantage of the Osr2Myc-Osr2AKi/+ mice, which carry the Osr2A cDNA knockin at the endogenous Osr2 locus and contain an in-frame fusion of a 6xMYC epitope tag coding sequence immediately 5′ to the translation start codon. Osr2Myc-Osr2Aki/- mice exhibit normal palate development, indicating that the Myc-Osr2A protein expressed from the knockin allele is sufficient to replace endogenous Osr2 function in palate development (Gao et al. 2009). We performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis of microdissected palatal shelf tissues from E13.5 Osr2Myc-Osr2AKi/Myc-Osr2Aki embryos with a monoclonal antibody specific for the MYC epitope tag, followed by real-time PCR analysis of enrichment of DNA fragments containing the Osr2-binding core sequence in the promoter regions of the Sema3a, Sema3d, and Sema3e genes. As shown in Figure 5C, Osr2 protein bound to 1 and 3 predicted sites in the 3-kb promoter region of the Sema3a and Sema3d genes, respectively, in the developing palatal mesenchyme. With the differential expression of Sema3a and Sema3d mRNAs in the palatal mesenchyme in Osr2-/- and control embryos and the effects of Osr2 on expression of the promoter-luciferase constructs in transfected NIH/3T3 cells, these results indicate that Osr2 directly regulates expression of Sema3a and Sema3d in the developing palatal mesenchyme.
Discussion
Although previous studies have clearly demonstrated a crucial role for Osr2 in palatal shelf growth and morphogenesis, the molecular mechanism mediating Osr2 function in palate development is largely unknown. In this study, we used whole transcriptome expression profiling, RT-qPCR, and in situ hybridization analyses, in combination with ChIP-qPCR identification of endogenous Osr2 binding at promoter sequences in the developing palatal shelves and promoter-luciferase reporter assays to uncover transcriptional target genes regulated by Osr2 in palate development. Gene ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes between Osr2RFP/- and Osr2RFP/+ embryonic palatal mesenchyme showed that expression of many signaling molecules and transcription factors involved in osteoblast differentiation is significantly increased in the Osr2 mutant palatal mesenchyme cells. A previous study showed that overexpression of only the Osr2 DNA-binding domain caused decreased proliferation and differentiation of calvarial osteoblasts in transgenic mice, which led to the hypothesis that Osr2 positively regulates osteoblastic cell proliferation (Kawai et al. 2007). The increase in expression of multiple positive regulators of osteogenesis in the Osr2 mutant palatal mesenchyme, with our previous finding that Osr2-/- embryos exhibit a significant reduction in palatal mesenchyme proliferation (Lan et al. 2004), suggests that enhanced osteogenic differentiation of the developing palatal mesenchyme contributes to cleft palate pathogenesis in Osr2-deficient mice.
Our RNA-seq and in situ hybridization assays reveal a crucial role for Osr2 in preventing aberrant activation of expression of 3 closely related class 3 semaphorins. Semaphorins were initially isolated as negative regulators of axonal guidance in neural development (Kolodkin et al. 1993; Luo et al. 1993). Subsequent studies have shown that these signaling molecules regulate many developmental and pathologic processes outside the nervous system, including cardiovascular development, endothelial motility, bone and lung morphogenesis, neural crest cell migration, cancer angiogenesis, and metastasis (Kruger et al. 2005; Yu and Moens 2005; Roth et al. 2009; Neufeld et al. 2012; Epstein et al. 2015; Valdembri et al. 2016). Whereas the cellular effects of the dramatically increased expression of Sema3a, Sema3d, and Sema3e in the Osr2 mutant palatal mesenchyme remain to be determined, recent studies have demonstrated a crucial role for these molecules, particularly Sema3a, in osteoblast differentiation (Hayashi et al. 2012; Fukuda et al. 2013; Ryynanen et al. 2017). It is possible that the increased Sema3 signaling contributes to cleft palate pathogenesis through enhancing osteogenic differentiation of the palatal mesenchyme in Osr2 mutant embryos. In addition, the increased expression of Sema3e might affect palate morphogenesis secondarily by affecting vascular pattern in the palatal shelves. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the contribution of Osr2-mediated regulation of class 3 semaphorins in palatal shelf growth and morphogenesis.
Author Contributions
X. Fu, contributed to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, drafted and critically revised the manuscript; J. Xu, H. Liu contributed to acquisition and analysis of data, critically revised the manuscript; P. Chaturvedi, contributed to analysis of data, critically revised the manuscript; R. Jiang contributed to conception, design, analysis, and interpretation of data, drafted and critically revised the manuscript; Y. Lan contributed to conception, design, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, drafted and critically revised the manuscript; All authors gave final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Lynessa McGee for technical assistance and the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Gene Expression and Sequencing Core Facilities for help with RNA-seq.
Footnotes
A supplemental appendix to this article is available online.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health / National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research grants DE013681 and DE018401.
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
References
- Almaidhan A, Cesario J, Landin Malt A, Zhao Y, Sharma N, Choi V, Jeong J. 2014. Neural crest-specific deletion of Ldb1 leads to cleft secondary palate with impaired palatal shelf elevation. BMC Dev Biol. 14:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Badis G, Berger MF, Philippakis AA, Talukder S, Gehrke AR, Jaeger SA, Chan ET, Metzler G, Vedenko A, Chen X, et al. 2009. Diversity and complexity in DNA recognition by transcription factors. Science. 324(5935):1720–1723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brunskill EW, Potter SS. 2012. RNA-Seq defines novel genes, RNA processing patterns and enhancer maps for the early stages of nephrogenesis: Hox supergenes. Dev Biol. 368(1):4–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bush JO, Jiang R. 2012. Palatogenesis morphogenetic and molecular mechanisms of secondary palate development. Development. 139(2):231–243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen J, Aronow BJ, Jegga AG. 2009. Disease candidate gene identification and prioritization using protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics. 10:73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dixon MJ, Marazita ML, Beaty TH, Murray JC. 2011. Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences. Nat Rev Genet. 12(3):167–178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Epstein JA, Aghajanian H, Singh MK. 2015. Semaphorin signaling in cardiovascular development. Cell Metab. 21(2):163–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fukuda T, Takeda S, Xu R, Ochi H, Sunamura S, Sato T, Shibata S, Yoshida Y, Gu Z, Kimura A, et al. 2013. Sema3A regulates bone-mass accrual through sensory innervations. Nature. 497(7450):490–493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Funato N, Nakamura M, Yanagisawa H. 2015. Molecular basis of cleft palates in mice. World J Biol Chem. 6(3):121–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao Y, Lan Y, Ovitt CE, Jiang R. 2009. Functional equivalence of the zinc finger transcription factors Osr1 and Osr2 in mouse development. Dev Biol. 328(2):200–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gu C, Yoshida Y, Livet J, Reimert DV, Mann F, Merte J, Henderson CE, Jessel TM, Kolodkin AL, Ginty DD. 2005. Semaphorin 3E and plexin-D1 control vascular pattern independently of neuropilins. Science. 307(5707):265–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi M, Nakashima T, Taniguchi M, Kodama T, Kumanogoh A, Takayanagi H. 2012. Osteoprotection by semaphorin 3A. Nature. 485(7396):69–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kawai S, Yamauchi M, Wakisaka S, Ooshima T, Amano A. 2007. Zinc-finger transcription factor odd-skipped related 2 is one of the regulators in osteoblast proliferation and bone formation. J Bone Miner Res. 22(9):1362–1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kolodkin A, Matthes D, Goodman C. 1993. The semaphorin genes encode a family of transmembrane and secreted growth cone guidance molecules. Cell. 75(7):1389–1399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kruger R, Aurandt J, Guan K. 2005. Semaphorins command cells to move. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 6(10):789–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lan Y, Jiang R. 2009. Sonic hedgehog signaling regulates reciprocal epithelial-mesenchymal interactions controlling palatal outgrowth. Development. 136(8):1387–1396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lan Y, Kingsley P, Cho E, Jiang R. 2001. Osr2, a new mouse gene related to drosophila odd-skipped, exhibits dynamic expression patterns during craniofacial, limb, and kidney development. Mech Dev. 107(1–2):175–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lan Y, Ovitt CE, Cho ES, Maltby KM, Wang Q, Jiang R. 2004. Odd-skipped related 2 (Osr2) encodes a key intrinsic regulator of secondary palate growth and morphogenesis. Development. 131(13):3207–3216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lan Y, Xu J, Jiang R. 2015. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of palatogenesis. Curr Top Dev Biol. 115:59–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lane J, Kaartinen V. 2014. Signaling networks in palate development. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 6(3):271–278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo Y, Raible D, Raper J. 1993. Collapsin: a protein in brain that induces the collapse and paralysis of neuronal growth cones. Cell. 75(2):217–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neufeld G, Sabag AD, Rabinovicz N, Kessler O. 2012. Semaphorins in angiogenesis and tumor progression. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2(1):a006718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peters H, Neubüser A, Kratochwil K, Balling R. 1998. Pax9-deficient mice lack pharyngeal pouch derivatives and teeth and exhibit craniofacial and limb abnormalities. Genes Dev. 12(17):2735–2747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prescott N, Lees M, Winter R, Malcolm S. 2000. Identification of susceptibility loci for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate in a two stage genome scan of affected sib-pairs. Hum Genet. 106(3):345–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roth L, Koncina E, Satkauskas S, Crémel G, Aunis D, Bagnard D. 2009. The many faces of semaphorins: from development to pathology. Cell Mol Life Sci. 66(4):649–666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryynanen J, Kriebitzsch C, Meyer MB, Janssens I, Pike JW, Verlinden L, Verstuyf A. 2017. Class 3 semaphorins are transcriptionally regulated by 1,25(OH)2D3 in osteoblasts. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 173:185-193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valdembri D, Regano D, Maione F, Giraudo E, Serini G. 2016. Class 3 semaphorins in cardiovascular development. Cell Adh Migr. 10(6):641–651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu J, Liu H, Lan Y, Aronow BJ, Kalinichenko VV, Jiang R. 2016. A Shh-Foxf-Fgf18-Shh molecular circuit regulating palate development. PLoS Genet. 12(1):e1005769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu HH, Moens CB. 2005. Semaphorin signaling guides cranial neural crest cell migration in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 280(2):373–385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Zhao X, Hu Y, St Amand T, Zhang M, Ramamurthy R, Qiu M, Chen Y. 1999. Msx1 is required for the induction of patched by sonic hedgehog in the mammalian tooth germ. Dev Dyn. 215(1):45–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou J, Gao Y, Lan Y, Jia S, Jiang R. 2013. Pax9 regulates a molecular network involving Bmp4, Fgf10, Shh signaling and the Osr2 transcription factor to control palate morphogenesis. Development. 140(23):4709–4718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou J, Gao Y, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Maltby KM, Liu Z, Lan Y, Jiang R. 2011. Osr2 acts downstream of Pax9 and interacts with both Msx1 and Pax9 to pattern the tooth developmental field. Dev Biol. 353(2):344–353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





