Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2017 Oct 4;2017:bcr2017221668. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-221668

Sclerokeratouveitis and lens dislocation in a patient with genital ulcer: was the great imitator imitated?

Anubha Rathi 1, Brijesh Takkar 1, Namrata Sharma 1
PMCID: PMC5652860  PMID: 28978606

Abstract

Uveitis is the most common ocular manifestation of syphilis, while scleritis is rare. A case of nodular scleritis, peripheral keratitis and uveitis in a patient with genital ulcer is presented in this report. This patient had a clinical profile suggestive of syphilis, though the serology was negative for treponemal antibodies. Other possible differential diagnosis imitating syphilis are discussed.

Keywords: eye, infections, urinary and genital tract disorders, anterior chamber

Background

Syphilis is an infectious disease caused by Treponema pallidum and has been labelled as the great imitator due to its varied presentations.1 Ocular syphilis usually manifests as uveitis and is usually seen in the latent phase of the infection, while scleritis is a rare presentation.1–5 The diagnosis is based on positive serology or direct demonstration of the spirochetes in human tissue.1 6 It is important to rule out the disease as early as possible as about a third of patients with latent infection eventually develop the potentially fatal form of tertiary syphilis. In fact serological testing has been suggested for every undiagnosed case of ocular inflammation.1

We present a case of successfully managed sclerokeratouveitis that had clinically definitive features of systemic and ocular syphilis though laboratory diagnosis proved otherwise. We discuss the differential diagnosis and the possible imitator of the great imitator itself!

Case presentation

A 45-year-old chronic alcoholic male was brought to our emergency services by a social worker with complaints of pain, redness and photophobia in both eyes (BE) since 5 days. There was history of multiple episodes of acute red eye treated with topical drugs. The patient denied history of systemic disease. Visual acuity was 5/60 in right eye (RE) and improved with correction to 6/12, while it was best corrected at hand motions close to face in left eye (LE). BE had anterior chamber cells (1+ in RE and 3+ in LE, standard uveitis nomenclature) fine keratic precipitates, a pupillary membrane, posterior synechiae and aphakia on slit lamp examination (figure 1). LE additionally had a perforated peripheral corneal ulcer measuring 5.5 mm in longest dimension with prolapsed iris tissue beneath pseudocornea along with multiple mildly tender scleral nodules (roughly 2×2 mm) in the temporal and inferior-temporal area. A sector of necrotising scleritis was also present adjacent to the perforated cornea in LE, while RE had a small isolated scleral nodule (figure 1). Ultrasound B scans of BE showed posterior dislocation of crystalline lens (figure 2). On leading questions, patient gave history of multiple sexual partners and history of high risk exposure in the last 15–20 years, the last contact being 20 days back. A solitary indurated painless genital ulcer measuring 1.3 cm in longest dimension was detected on the scrotum during systemic examination (figure 3).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Clinical anterior segment photographs of (A) right eye and (B) left eye. Both eyes had aphakia with pupillary membrane, posterior synechiae and nodular scleritis (stars). Additionally, left eye had a perforated peripheral corneal ulcer with prolapsed iris tissue and pseudocornea (arrow).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Ultrasound B scan of (A) right eye and (B) left eye showing posteriorly dislocated lens. Note the high spikes on vector scan corresponding to the lenses.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Clinical photograph of the scrotum of the patient showing solitary indurated genital ulcer that measured to 1.3 cm in longest dimension. (B) Clinical photograph of the lesion following treatment for 2 weeks showing the healed ulcer.

A presumptive diagnosis of BE infective nodular scleritis, anterior uveitis and aphakia, with LE perforated peripheral ulcerative keratitis and necrotising scleritis was made.

Investigations

Gram stain and potassium hydroxide preparation preparation of corneal scraping of LE were negative as were the bacterial and fungal culture reports obtained in due course. He was diagnosed to have syphilitic chancre by the dermatologist but serology reports obtained after 3 days were negative for viral markers (HIV, herpes simplex virus (HSV), hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B virus), while venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) and fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) were also negative. Chest X-ray, Mantoux test and immune markers (antinuclear antibody, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody and rheumatoid factor) were also negative.

Treatment

The patient was advised BE topical moxifloxacin (0.3%) two hourly, cycloplegia, oral vitamin C and oral doxycycline.

Outcome and follow-up

While the patient was being investigated, there was a dramatic improvement in BE within 48 hours. By 10th day of follow-up, corrected visual acuity had improved to 6/9 in RE and 6/60 in LE. There were no congestion and no anterior chamber cells in BE, BE scleral nodules resolved while LE perforated corneal ulcer had healed further with formation of a vascularised corneoiridic scar (figure 4). Even the genital ulcer showed marked improvement with no induration and significant reduction in size (figure 3). The condition remained stable at 1 month of follow-up.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Clinical photographs of the anterior segment of (A) right eye and (B) left eye showing resolution of scleritis and the scleral nodules. The corneal ulcer of the left eye also healed with the formation of a scar (arrow). Minimal dilation and congestion of the vessels can be seen at the site of the scleral nodule (star).

Discussion

Sclerouveitis can be due to infective causes like tuberculosis, syphilis, Lyme’s disease, HSV, leprosy or due to inflammatory causes like systemic lupus erythematosus, sarcoidosis, granulomatosis with polyangitis and Behcet disease.3 7–9 Differentiating infectious causes from inflammatory is paramount for prevention of untoward complications. We diagnosed the patient to have an infectious disease due to his profile and possible exposure to a veneral disease and due to rapidly progressive scleral and corneal necrosis in his LE. The rationale for starting doxycycline was prevention of further corneal melting, promotion of corneal healing and provision of a broad spectrum anti-infective cover. The quick response of the ocular condition to antibiotics without steroids within 48 hours indicates that disease was indeed infectious in aetiology.1

Ocular signs of bilateral scleritis, lens dislocation, iris nodules and uveitis are known to be among the classical signs of syphilitic anterior uveitis.1 The solitary painless genital ulcer was diagnosed to be syphilitic chancre by the dermatologist, which is the diagnostic sign of primary stage of syphilis and may rarely also be seen in secondary syphilis.1 10 However, ocular signs like lens dislocation and history of episodes of acute red eye indicate latent or tertiary stage of syphilis, which are the most common stages of ocular involvement by the organism.1 Further, we could not prove the disease serologically and dark field microscopy was not available to us.6 Therefore, we decided against penicillin therapy and continued doxycycline, which is a known alternative therapy for syphilis.11 Every case of ocular syphilis should be evaluated for possibility of neurosyphilis by cerebrospinal fluid analysis,1 but our patient did not give consent for the invasive procedure due to the doubtful diagnosis. One may explain the presence of chancre in latent/tertiary phase by re-exposure of a patient with syphilis to the organism, but laboratory evidence points otherwise.6 Thus, we concluded in retrospect that another disease may have imitated syphilis in this patient. A biopsy, scleral-corneal or from the scrotal ulcer, should be considered in such suspicious cases. However, they were not performed in our case as both the ocular and genital lesions showed a rapid response to therapy, even before the blood could be analysed for the presence of antibodies.

Lyme disease or Borreliosis is the other probable imitator as scleritis is reported in it and it may also cause genital lesions when disseminated.9 12 Of note, Borreliosis is also caused by a spirochete which may explain the response to therapy. However, the absence of erythema migrans, tick bite and ‘late manifestations’ of the disease virtually rule out a confirmed/probable diagnosis.13 The genital ulcer caused by HSV is known to have multiple vesicles and is painful and was ruled out on serology. Inflammatory causes like Behcet disease and MAGIC syndrome may also be considered in a case of genital ulcer with sclerouveitis, but the resolution without steroids is unlikely.14 In latent syphilis, VDRL test can be falsely negative in 30% of cases while FTA-ABS test is false negative very rarely, in 1%–2% of cases.1 Therefore serology negative syphilis is a distant possibility in view of clinical presentation. Although immunodeficiency may be responsible for the negative FTA-ABS test, the systemic history and blood investigations of our patient were not indicative of such a state. Bilateral peripheral keratitis in the setting of chronic alcohol abuse raises a distant possibility of distinct corneal infections related to general debilitation and immune dysfunction.15 16 But we could not attain any evidence of local infection on microscopic examination or microbial culture of corneal scraping. Trauma and neurotrophic ulcers can also be considered as the cause of bilateral peripheral corneal ulcers in patients with such a profile, but the absence of history of trauma and the presence of scleral nodules and the scrotal ulcer indicated otherwise.

Learning points.

  • Ruling out infectious causes of sclerouveitis is pivotal to its successful management.

  • Despite best efforts, confirmatory laboratory diagnosis may remain elusive and relying on clinical signs in such cases is recommended.

Footnotes

Contributors: All authors equally contributed to the workup diagnosis and management. AR did the imaging. BT wrote the manuscript and NS did critical revision of the script. AR holds the overall responsibility.

Competing interests: None declared.

Patient consent: Obtained.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Mauro J, Samson CM, Foster CS. Chapter 16: Syphilis : Foster CS, Vitale AT, Diagnosis and treatment of uveitis. second India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, 2013:337–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wilhelmus KR, Yokoyama CM. Syphilitic episcleritis and scleritis. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;104:595–7. 10.1016/0002-9394(87)90170-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shaikh SI, Biswas J, Rishi P. Nodular syphilitic scleritis masquerading as an ocular tumor. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect 2015;5:8 10.1186/s12348-015-0040-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fénolland JR, Bonnel S, Rambaud C, et al. Syphilitic scleritis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2016;24:93–5. 10.3109/09273948.2014.916307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Casey R, Flowers CW, Jones DD, et al. Anterior nodular scleritis secondary to syphilis. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:1015–6. 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140223022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ratnam S. The laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2005;16:45–51. 10.1155/2005/597580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Watson PG, Hayreh SS. Scleritis and episcleritis. Br J Ophthalmol 1976;60:163–91. 10.1136/bjo.60.3.163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Riono WP, Hidayat AA, Rao NA, et al. Scleritis: a clinicopathologic study of 55 cases. Ophthalmology 1999;106:1328–33. 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00719-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Krist D, Wenkel H. Posterior scleritis associated with Borrelia burgdorferi (lyme disease) infection. Ophthalmology 2002;109:143–5. 10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00868-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kumar B, Gupta S, Muralidhar S. Mucocutaneous manifestations of secondary syphilis in north Indian patients: a changing scenario? J Dermatol 2001;28:137–44. 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2001.tb00107.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ghanem KG, Erbelding EJ, Cheng WW, et al. Doxycycline compared with benzathine penicillin for the treatment of early syphilis. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42:e45–e49. 10.1086/500406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Finch JJ, Wald J, Ferenczi K, et al. Disseminated lyme disease presenting with nonsexual acute genital ulcers. JAMA Dermatol 2014;150:1202–4. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.1072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baer JC. Chapter 17: Borreliosis : Foster CS, Vitale AT, Diagnosis and treatment of uveitis. 2nd India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, 2013:346–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Firestein GS, Gruber HE, Weisman MH, et al. Mouth and genital ulcers with inflamed cartilage: MAGIC syndrome. Five patients with features of relapsing polychondritis and Behçet’s disease. Am J Med 1985;79:65–72. 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90547-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pasala S, Barr T, Messaoudi I. Impact of alcohol abuse on the adaptive immune system. Alcohol Res 2015;37:185–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ormerod LD, Gomez DS, Schanzlin DJ, et al. Chronic alcoholism and microbial keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 1988;72:155–9. 10.1136/bjo.72.2.155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES