Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2017 Oct 9;2017:bcr2017221944. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-221944

Unusual case of urethral steinstrasse following laser cystolitholapaxy

Vaite Lisa Marie Tsing 1, Margaret Mary Mansbridge 1, Edward Ramez Latif 1, Scott Thomas McClintock 1
PMCID: PMC5652875  PMID: 28993362

Abstract

Urethral steinstrasse is a rare finding. This case describes a 35-year-old man presenting with urethral steinstrasse 4 weeks following laser cystolitholapaxy of a large bladder stone.

Keywords: urological surgery, urology

Background

Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological disease, affecting 5%–13% of people worldwide.1 Bladder calculi are less prevalent than renal calculi, and have a multifactorial pathogenesis, typically associated with urinary infections, urinary stasis and bladder outlet obstruction.2 Bladder stones are commonly treated with cystolitholapaxy. We describe an unusual case of urethral steinstrasse, following laser cystolitholapaxy. Steinstrasse, or ‘stone street’, is a well-documented complication following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for renal stones, which typically manifests in the ureter. Steinstrasse within the urethra, however, is exceedingly rare.

Case presentation

A 35-year-old man presented with difficulty voiding and palpable calculi within the penile urethra. Four weeks prior, at an interstate hospital, he had undergone an elective cystoscopy, laser cystolitholapaxy and circumcision for a 4.1 cm bladder stone (figure 1) and tight phimosis. Of note, meatal stenosis and a distal urethral stricture were identified and intraoperatively dilated. On discharge he was instructed to self-catheterise.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Axial (A) and coronal (B) views of a non-contrast CT of the pelvis showing a large 4.1 cm calculus within the bladder.

He initially succeeded; however, passage of the catheter became difficult and eventually impossible, prompting presentation to the emergency department in urinary retention and dribbling urine. He reported passing multiple large stone fragments, although none recently, and had a deteriorating stream with occasional haematuria and dysuria. Examination revealed palpable solid masses along the entire penile urethra and mild oedema at the urethral meatus. Plain X-ray (figure 2) confirmed a significant stone steinstrasse within the penile urethra and multiple fragments within the bladder. He underwent urgent endoscopic management with meatal and urethral dilatation, and retrieval of all urethral and bladder calculi. Several retrieved fragments are pictured in figure 3. Stone analysis revealed calcium hydrogen, phosphate, tricalcium phosphate and magnesium ammonium phosphate stones.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Radiogram showing urethral steinstrasse (arrow) and multiple bladder fragments.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Intraoperative photograph showing some of the stone fragments retrieved from the urethra and bladder.

Investigations

Bloods on admission showed normal renal function, creatinine 65 µmol/L, normal electrolytes, white cell count 12.4×109/L, urine microscopy leucocytes >500×106/L, erythrocytes 90×106/L, mixed enteric bacteria and skin flora on culture. Plain X-ray on admission is shown in figure 2.

Outcome and follow-up

All stone fragments were removed from the urethra and bladder. Following removal of the in-dwelling catheter the following day, the patient was able to successfully pass urine. He was instructed to perform daily self-catheterisation, and he remains well and symptom-free 4 weeks postoperatively.

Discussion

Urethral steinstrasse in men are exceedingly rare. Only six other cases have been reported, from as early as 1869.3 Steinstrasse following ESWL of renal stones are most commonly found in the ureter, not the urethra, but an interesting report from 1993 describes two cases of urethral steinstrasse following ESWL for large renal calculi.4 Vaddi et al5 describe a paediatric case of urethral steinstrasse causing acute urinary retention in a 10-year-old with very large renal calculi. Brahmbhatt et al6 describe the case of a pancreas-kidney transplant patient who, in a similar fashion to our case, developed urethral steinstrasse following cystolitholapaxy. Lastly, a more complex case is described by Kumar et al7, where a middle-aged man with a history of distal urethral stricture disease presented with urethral steinstrasse and passing stones through a urethrocutaneous fistula at the base of the penis.

This rare case of urethral steinstrasse is unique given its association with urethral stricture disease in a young adult man presenting a month after cystolitholapaxy. It is paramount to ensure that, in patients with known urethral stricture disease, all stone fragments are thoroughly washed out following cystolitholapaxy. Alternatively these patients should be considered for open cystostomy, particularly in bladder stones >4 cm, given the difficulties patients may have passing fragments as demonstrated by this case.

Learning points.

  • Urethral steinstrasse are exceedingly rare.

  • Urethral steinstrasse may present as a complication of cystolitholapaxy.

  • Care should be taken to extract all stone fragments at the time of cystolitholapaxy, especially in patients with a finding or history of urethral stricture disease.

  • Open cystostomy should be considered for stones >4 cm in patients with a finding or history of urethral stricture disease.

Footnotes

Contributors: VLMT: involved in the clinical care of the patient, obtained informed consent, wrote the manuscript text, and extracted, reformatted and labelled all imaging. MMM: involved in the clinical care of the patient, reviewed the manuscript text. ERL involved in the clinical care of the patient, obtained intraoperative photograph and reviewed the manuscript text. STMcC: supervising consultant in the clinical care of the patient and reviewed the manuscript text.

Competing interests: None declared.

Patient consent: Obtained.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, et al. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol 2017;35:1301–20. 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Childs MA, Mynderse LA, Rangel LJ, et al. Pathogenesis of bladder calculi in the presence of urinary stasis. J Urol 2013;189:1347–51. 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Annandale T. Case of Multiple Calculi in the Urethra. Br Med J 1869;1:399 10.1136/bmj.1.435.399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Biyani CS, Bhatia V, Baliga D, et al. Urethral steinstrasse-clinical experience and radiographic findings. Clin Radiol 1993;48:273–4. 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)81017-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vaddi SP, Devraj R, Reddy V, et al. Urethral steinstrasse causing acute urinary retention. Urology 2011;77:594–5. 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brahmbhatt YG, Schulsinger DA, Wadhwa NK. Urethral steinstrasse in renal transplantation. Kidney Int 2009;75:344 10.1038/ki.2008.258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kumar S, Sharma S, Ganesamoni R, et al. Urethral steinstrasse with urethrocutaneous fistula. Urology 2012;79:e1–2. 10.1016/j.urology.2011.02.060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES