Abstract
Purpose
The discoidin domain-containing receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (DDR2) is known to contain mutations in a small subset of patients with squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the lung. Studying the DDR2 mutations in patients with SCC of the lung would advance our understanding and guide the development of therapeutic strategies against lung cancer.
Materials and Methods
We selected 100 samples through a preliminary genetic screen, including specimens from biopsies and surgical resection, and confirmed SCC by histologic examination. DDR2 mutations on exons 6, 15, 16, and 18 were analyzed by Sanger sequencing of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. The functional effects of novel DDR2 mutants were confirmed by in vitro assays.
Results
We identified novel somatic mutations of DDR2 in two of the 100 SCC samples studied. One mutation was c.1745T>A (p.V582E) and the other was c.1784T>C (p.L595P), and both were on exon 15. Both patients were smokers and EGFR/KRAS/ALK-triple negative. The expression of the mutant DDR2 induced activation of DDR2 by the collagen ligand and caused enhanced cell growth and tumor progression. Moreover, dasatinib, a DDR2 inhibitor, showed potential efficacy against DDR2 L595P mutant–bearing cells.
Conclusion
Our results suggest that a mutation in DDR2 occurs naturally with a frequency of about 2% in Korean lung SCC patients. In addition, we showed that each of the novel DDR2 mutations were located in a kinase domain and induced an increase in cell proliferation rate.
Keywords: Discoidin domain receptor 2, Squamous cell carcinoma, Lung neoplasms, Somatic mutations
Introduction
Lung cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide, and about 14% of all new cancer patients have lung cancer. In 2010, about 222,500 new cases were reported, and about 157,300 people died from lung cancer in the United States [1,2]. The high mortality of lung cancer may be attributed to the fact that 70% of lung cancer patients are at an advanced stage (stage IV) of the disease at initial diagnosis, and therefore incurable [3]. About 85% of lung cancer cases are non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), which are classified into adenocarcinomas (ADC), squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), and large cell carcinomas based on the major histological subtype [2]. Until recently, the various subtypes of NSCLC were grouped together for the purpose of treatment, but it is now widely known that different histologic subtypes should be treated as separate disease entities [2,4]. SCC is the second most prevalent type of lung cancer. However, because the molecular pathogenesis of this disease is not well understood, no approved targeted therapeutics are available for its treatment [5]. Therefore, performing comparative analyses of lung SCCs and identifying potential therapeutic targets would lead to significant growth in cancer treatments. As a result, a great amount of progress has been made in studies and clinical trials to develop targeted treatments for lung cancer patients. Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS are the most common causes of lung cancer [6], and although the frequency of echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4–anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) rearrangements in NSCLC is low, ALK rearrangements have been reported to be successful targets of specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as crizotinib and ceritinib [7]. Mutations of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and tyrosine-protein kinase MET, have also been found in NSCLCs, but they are rare and their significance is unclear [8,9]. A recent study reported amplified fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) in 10%-20% of SCCs, suggesting that targeting FGFR1might be a promising therapeutic strategy [10]. However, FGFR inhibitors are not currently in clinical use for the treatment of lung cancers [11]. The use of histone deacetylase inhibitors for SCC treatment has been suggested, as they induced tumor cell death by up-regulating the pro-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) family members [12]. In 2011, Hammerman et al. [3] identified novel somatic mutations in the discoidin domain-containing receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (DDR2) gene at a frequency of 3.8% (n=11) in a set of 290 lung SCC samples. DDR2 is a collagen binding receptor, and a subset of DDR2 mutants in cancer are oncogenic and have been shown to promote cell migration, proliferation, and survival [3,13,14]. DDR2 mutations are mainly found in SCCs of NSCLC and are distributed throughout the gene, including in L63V, I120M, and D125Y in the collagen-binding discoidin 1 domain, C580Y, I638F, T765P, G774E, and G744V in the kinase domain, L239R and G253C in the discoidin 2 domain, and G505S in the cytosolic juxtamembrane domain [3,15]. DDR2 L63V and I638F mutations have been shown to confer transforming abilities to NIH3T3 cells, and lung cancer cells with DDR2 L239R or I638F mutations were also shown to be sensitive to treatment with a DDR2 inhibitor, dasatinib [3]. Therefore, identifying mutations in DDR2 could provide candidates to modulate the response of lung SCCs to chemotherapy [16]. In this study, we analyzed 100 lung SCC samples from Korean patients to identify novel somatic mutations in DDR2 and investigated the frequencies and functions of these mutations.
Materials and Methods
1. Case selection
The study sample was composed of 100 patients with SCC of the lung. Ninety-seven patients underwent biopsy and/or surgical resection at Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between 2000 and 2011. DDR2 mutation analyses were performed mainly on the biopsy specimens, which were from a total of 85 cases. Twelve cases were obtained by surgical resection and three cases were received from an outside hospital. Clinical data including age, sex, and stage were obtained from patient records (Table 1). Slides were reviewed independently by two pathologists to verify the diagnoses and tumor content in the tissues. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center.
Table 1.
Clinicopathologic parameter | No. (n=100) |
---|---|
Age (yr) | |
< 65 | 60 |
≥ 65 | 40 |
Sex | |
Male | 93 |
Female | 7 |
Tumor size | |
T1 | 12 |
T2 | 39 |
T3 | 34 |
T4 | 10 |
Unknown | 9 |
Lymph node status | |
N0 | 36 |
N1 | 22 |
N2 | 17 |
N3 | 19 |
Unknown | 6 |
Metastasis | |
M0 | 76 |
M1 | 16 |
Unknown | 8 |
Pathologic stage | |
Ⅰ | 14 |
Ⅱ | 23 |
Ⅲ | 35 |
Ⅳ | 19 |
Unknown | 91 |
2. DDR2 DNA sequence analysis
Genomic DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissues using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). We subjected 100 ng of genomic DNA to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of exons 6, 15, 16 and 18 of the DDR2 gene. The primer pairs used to amplify the complete coding sequences of DDR2 exons 6, 15, 16, and 18 are outlined in Table 2. PCR was performed on 20 μL reaction mixtures containing 100 ng of template DNA, 2 μL 10× PCR buffer, 0.25 mM dNTP, 10 pmol primers, and 1.25 U Taq DNA polymerase (iNtRON, Seongnam, Korea). PCR products were separated via electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels and purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen). Bidirectional sequencing was performed using the BigDye Terminator v1.1 kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) on the ABI 3130XL genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Sequencher ver. 4.10.1 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI) was used along with a manual review of chromatograms for sequence analysis. Confirmatory re-sequencing from replicate PCR amplification reactions was performed for any sequence that was ambiguous or that deviated from the wild type, so that all abnormal sequences were verified in at least quadruplicate for replicate amplification reactions.
Table 2.
Primer name | Forward primer sequence | Reverse primer sequence |
---|---|---|
DDR2 EX6 | 5′-GCTTGCCTGTGAACCAGTAA-3′ | 5′-GTTCCGCCAAGAGATCCAG-3′ |
DDR2 EX15 | 5′-GGAAATGCCCAGCAAGAGTA-3′ | 5′-ATTTTCACAGCCACCAGGAC-3′ |
DDR2 EX16 | 5′-GCCTTGGTGTGCATTCTTCT-3′ | 5′-GCGGGAAAGAAACTGATTGA-3′ |
DDR2 EX18 | 5′-GGTGTTGTTGTGCACAGGTT-3′ | 5′-CCCTTGGTCTCGGAAGAACT-3′ |
DDR2 WT | 5′-ATCAGAATTCATGATCCTGATTCCCAGAATGC-3′ | 5′-ATCAGCGGCCGCCTCGTCGCCTTGTTGAAGGA-3′ |
DDR2 L63V | 5′-GTGGACTCAGAAGAAGGGGATGG-3′ | 5′-CCTTCCATATTTGGCAGCTGTG G-3′ |
DDR2 V582E | 5′-GAGGAGGGAATGGAAAAATTCAAAG-3′ | 5′-TTCACAGAGATGAACCTCCCCAAAC-3′ |
DDR2 L595P | 5'-CCAGATGTCAGTGCC AACCAGC-3′ | 5′-GGCAAAATCTTTGTCTTTGAATTTTTCC-3′ |
DDR2 I638F | 5′-TTCCATCTATTAGCTGTGTGTATCACTGATG-3′ | 5′-GATGTTTGGG TCCTTGAGCCG-3′ |
DDR2, discoidin domain-containing receptor tyrosine kinase 2.
3. Cell culture
NIH 3T3 cells were obtained from the Korean Cell Line Bank and BEAS-2B (human bronchial epithelium, ATCC CRL-9609) cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA), Both two cell lines were expanded in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (JBI, Daegu, Korea) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin (Life Technologies). To generate NIH 3T3 and BEAS-2B stable cells expressing DDR2 wild-type (WT) and mutants, cells were transfected with LacZ (negative control), DDR2 WT, L63V, V582E, L595P, or I638F DDR2 mutant expressing lentiviruses for 24 hours and then selected with 6 μg/mL blasticidin for 2 weeks.
4. Cloning DDR2 constructs
For the full-length DDR2 constructs, we used cDNA synthesized from Hs578T cell line as a template and DDR2 WT and mutant constructs were generated using PCR reactions. We described primer sets for cloning of DDR2 constructs in the Table 2. The amplified DDR2 wildtype PCR product was cloned into gateway entry vector pCR8/GW/TOPO (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Carlsbad, CA). DDR2 mutants were generated using the EZchange Site-directed Mutagenesis kit (Enzynomics, Daejeon, Korea) with the following mutagenic primer sets; all mutations were verified by Sanger sequencing. The WT and mutant DDR2 constructs were transferred into pLenti6.3/V5-DEST gateway destination vectors (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The pLenti-based expression vector and the ViraPower Packaging Mix vector (Invitrogen, Life Technologies) were co-transfected into the 293FT cell line to produce a lentiviral stock following Life Technologies protocols.
5. Western blotting
Whole cell lysates from cells expressing LacZ, WT, L63V, V582E, L595P, or I638F were prepared using a modified RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, and 0.25% sodium deoxycholate) and a protease inhibitor cocktail (GenDepot, Barker, TX). The lysates were centrifuged at 15,000 ×g for 30 minutes at 4°C and diluted with 4× sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDSPAGE) sample buffer (40% glycerol, 240 mM Tris/HCl pH 6.8, 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.04% bromophenol blue, 5% beta-mercaptoethanol). All samples were boiled at 95°C-100°C for 10 minutes, and loaded in the SDS-PAGE on an 8%-10% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA). Blots were blocked with 5% w/v nonfat dry milk (BD, Transduction Laboratories, San Diego, CA) for 1 hour before primary antibodies were added to the blocking solution and incubated overnight at 4ºC on a shaker. The blots were probed with an anti-DDR2 antibody (2538-DR, R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN), and anti–α-tubulin, –β-actin antibodies (sc-8035, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti–phosphotyrosine-100, –Src and c-Src antibodies (Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA). Blots were washed 2-3 times with TBST buffer (Tris-buffered saline and Tween 20) and then incubated with the horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–conjugated anti-goat or rabbit IgG secondary antibodies for 1 hour followed washed with TBST for 1 hour. Antibody detection was performed using chemiluminescent HRP substrate (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA). All western blot images are representative of at least three independent experiments.
6. Proliferation assay
Cell proliferation rates were measured using an EZ-Cytox cell viability assay kit (Daeil Lab Service, Seoul, Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. BEAS-2B cells expressing the target gene were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 3×103 cells per well. After 72 hours, 10 mL of EZ-Cytox reagent was added to each well and incubated for 2 hours at 37ºC. The absorbance was measured at a wavelength 450 nm (foreground) and 650 nm (background) using a spectrophotometer.
7. In vitro transforming assay
Analysis of the transforming activity of kinase fusions was performed with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) and soft agar. BEAS-2B stable cells expressing DDR2 WT, L63V, V582E, L595P, or I638F mutant were cultured in Matrigel. The bottom layer of each well was coated with 30 μL of Matrigel and allowed to gel by incubating for 30 minutes at 37ºC. Then, 10,000 cells resuspended in 150 μL of Matrigel were loaded onto the bottom layer of each well. Medium with 10% FBS was then overlaid onto the gel and replaced every other day. The images of transformed foci were obtained after culturing for 7 days. For the soft agar assay, the base layer of each well consisted of 1.5 mL of medium with a final concentration of 0.5% Noble agar (BD Biosciences). After bottom agar solidification, 1.5 mL of 0.35% agar containing NIH3T3 cells (20,000) was seeded on the bottom agar layer and incubated for 14 days. Medium was changed every 2 days for 2 weeks. Colonies were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and then stained with 0.05% crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and representative images were taken by a phase-contrast microscope (Olympus CKX41, Tokyo, Japan) using i-Solution Lite image analysis software (Image & Microscope Technology, Daejeon, Korea). Statistical significance was analyzed by the GraphPad Prism 5 (ver. 5.01, GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA).
Results
Among 100 patients, two patients were found to have DDR2 mutations (c.1754T>A [p.V582E] and c.1784T>C [p.L595P] on exon 15). PolyPhen analysis (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph/) predicted that these variants would damage the structure and function of DDR2 (Table 3).
Table 3.
Exon | Genotype | PolyPhen | PSIC score differencee |
---|---|---|---|
Exon 6 | L63V | Benign | 1.417 |
R105S | Probably damaging | 2.463 | |
I120M | Benign | 1.362 | |
D125Y | Probably damaging | 2.506 | |
Exon 9 | L239R | Possibly damaging | 1.557 |
G253C | Probably damaging | 2.592 | |
Exon 13 | N456S | Possibly damaging | 1.696 |
Exon 14 | G505S | Benign | 1.220 |
T533K | Possibly damaging | 1.795 | |
Exon 15 | C580Y | Probably damaging | 3.608 |
V582E | Possibly damaging | 1.690 | |
L595P | Possibly damaging | 1.736 | |
Exon 16 | I638F | Possibly damaging | 1.950 |
Exon 18 | T765P | Probably damaging | 2.087 |
G774E | Probably damaging | 2.452 | |
G774V | Probably damaging | 2.677 | |
Exon 19 | P815L | Benign | 0.711 |
DDR2, discoidin domain-containing receptor tyrosine kinase 2; PSIC, position-specific independent counts.
A 71-year-old male patient (case 1) underwent a follow-up chest computed tomography (CT) scan in March 2009 for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that was diagnosed in 1998. The patient was a smoker with a 92-pack/yr history. Chest CT showed a 3 cm nonenhancing mass-like consolidation in the central portion of the left lower lobe with a background of patchy fibrotic changes, as well as scattered calcified and noncalcified sub-centimeter nodules in both lungs (Fig. 1A). A bronchoscopic biopsy performed in May of 2009 revealed high-grade squamous dysplasia. A chest CT in September of 2010 showed that the mass-like consolidation had increased in size to 6.2 cm and that there were numerous new cavitary and noncavitary nodules in both lungs (Fig. 1B). These nodules were suspected to be primary lung cancers with intra-lung metastases. Hilar, mediastinal, and supraclavicular lymph nodes were suspected to have metastases by capsular invasion. A second bronchoscopic biopsy revealed tumor cells of squamous differentiation with intercellular bridges (Fig. 1C). No mutations were observed in EGFR or KRAS. The patient refused palliative chemotherapy and only received supportive care. The patient was lost to follow-up after January 2011. When DDR2 mutation analysis was performed for this patient, c.1745T>A (p.V582E) on exon 15 was identified (Fig. 1D).
In another case, a 70-year-old male patient (case 2) visited an outside hospital in May of 2010 due to a persistent dry cough. The patient was a 50-pack/yr smoker who had recently ceased smoking. The patient had undergone regular examinations for rheumatoid arthritis over the last 20 years at an outside hospital, and had been under medication, including steroids, for several years. He was diagnosed with diabetes mellitus 1 month prior to his admission at our hospital. A chest radiograph revealed abnormal findings and the patient was referred for further evaluation. At the Samsung Medical Center, chest CT and magnetic resonance imaging were performed and a 5.3 cm necrotic cavitary mass was revealed in the basal segment of the right lower lung lobe without enlarged lymph nodes (Fig. 2A). The mass was diagnosed as SCC by bronchoscopic biopsy (Fig. 2B and C). The patient underwent a lobectomy of the right lower lobe and an en bloc wedge resection of the right middle lobe because the tumor was located in the right lower lobe beside the middle lobe. Following surgery, pathologic examination revealed a 5 cm mass without pleural invasion. We found lymphatic and perineural invasion, but no metastasis, in the 11 lymph nodes examined. The tumor showed keratinized squamous differentiation with intercellular bridges. Upon immunohistochemical staining, we found that the tumor cells were positive for p63 and negative for thyroid transcription factor-1 (Fig. 2D and E). No mutations were observed in EGFR or KRAS. The patient was treated with adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of vinorelbine and cisplatin. He visited an emergency room because of severe back pain 7 days after the initiation of chemotherapy and was subsequently lost to follow-up. DDR2 mutation analysis of this patient revealed c.1784T>C (p.L595P) on exon 15 (Fig. 2F).
To determine if the novel DDR2 mutations identified in this study had oncogenic functions, we constructed lentiviral expression vectors containing the V582E or L595P mutations of DDR2, as well as L63V or I638F mutations as positive controls, as described in previous studies [3]. We then generated clonal populations of NIH3T3 cells stably expressing these constructs. The ectopic DDR2 mutant expression was evaluated using western blot analysis (Fig. 3B). We also showed that cells expressing the mutant DDR2 had increased phosphorylation of the DDR2 receptor (black arrow in Fig. 3B) and Src, relative to control LacZ after collagen stimulation (Fig. 3B). To further validate the tumorigenic potential of DDR2 mutants, we tested their tumor-forming ability in vitro. Interestingly, both cells that expressed DDR2 V582E mutant and those that expressed L595P mutants formed significantly larger colonies, as well as a higher number of colonies than cells harboring DDR2 I638F or L63V mutations (Fig. 3C). Considering the genetic background of patients with the DDR2 mutations, we generated BEAS-2B cells expressing DDR2 wild type and mutants from normal human bronchial epithelium and conducted a cell proliferation assay (S1 Fig. A). As shown in S1 Fig. A, cells expressing DDR2 V582E or L595P mutants showed higher growth rates than control cells. These results indicate that the DDR2 V582E or L595P mutation induced cell proliferation and enhanced tumor progression.
Dasatinib is a multiple kinase inhibitor that has been shown to be effective at reducing the tumor size of SCCs expressing DDR2 I683F or L239R mutants [3]. To investigate whether the novel DDR2 mutants were potential therapeutic targets of dasatinib, the relative cell viability was assessed for 72 hours after treatment with 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 μg/mL of dasatinib (Fig. 3D). We found that cells expressing DDR2 L595P mutants were more sensitive to 0.1 μg/mL dasatinib than those with DDR2 V582E or other DDR2 mutants, and that the phosphorylation of Src was down-regulated by dasatinib treatment in NIH3T3 cells (Fig. 3D). We obtained the same results for BEAS-2B cells expressing DDR2 L595P mutants as well (S1 Fig. B). Cells were seeded in 3-D Matrigel and cultured for 7 days with or without 0.1 μM dasatinib. Dasatinib treatment caused a decrease in the colony size of cells expressing DDR2 L595P mutant compared with the LacZ control (S1 Fig. B). These results showed that both DDR2 V582E and L595P mutants were oncogenic mutations and cancer drivers. In addition, the DDR2 L595P mutant was dasatinib-sensitive, indicating it might be a potential therapeutic target.
Discussion
The most targetable mutant kinases, EGFR, ALK, and HER2, are mainly found in lung ADCs and only rarely in other histological subtypes. Patients with SCC, who comprise about 40% of all NSCLC cases, are very rarely responsive to targeting agents, and specific genetic alterations in SCC have not been identified to date. Recent molecular analyses have identified genes that may play important roles in lung squamous cell tumorigenesis, including FGFR1, PIK3CA (phosphoinositide-3-kinase catalytic alpha polypeptide), SOX2, and DDR2 [3,22,23]. Tumor cell lines harboring DDR2 mutations have shown increased sensitivity to multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors in vitro and in vivo, including small molecule inhibitors such as dasatinib, nilotinib, and AP24534 [3,16].
DDR2 mutations have been reported in multiple tumor types with high incidence rates, including gastric carcinomas, bladder carcinomas, melanomas, colorectal cancers, and head and neck cancers [15,19]. Moreover, DDR2 mutations have been reported with 2%-5% frequency in lung SCCs [3,15,19,24]. However, the observed frequency of DDR2 mutations may be associated with ethnic differences in sample populations [25]. For example, no DDR2 mutations were found in a screen of 166 SCC biopsies from Japanese patients [25], but DDR2 mutations were identified with a frequency of 4.6% in a study with 86 Chinese patients with lung SCC [26]. In the present study, we identified a lower mutation frequency of 2% in 100 Korean lung SCC samples. This is likely because our study had a small patient cohort size, but it is not clear if this was due to population differences or other causes.
DDR2 is a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of SCCs in lungs, but genetic alterations such as overexpression of DDR2 or copy number aberrations of the DDR2 locus (1q12-23) have not been reported [3]. However, DDR2 mutations have been associated with responses to targeted agents or to sh-RNA–mediated depletion of DDR2 [3,20,27]. DDR2 mutations are mainly distributed in both the kinase and discoidin domains to recognize specific sites in the extracellular region that binds to collagen, and to activate downstream molecules including SHP-2 as well as SRC and mitogen-activated protein kinases [18,28]. The activation of DDR2 by mutations such as L63V, I638F, and S768R has been associated with cancer progression, including cell proliferation, migration, transformation, and differentiation [3,18]. However, DDR2mutations have also been reported to act as a tumor suppressors in the presence of its ligand, collagen. Kazuto et al. [29] performed the first functional analysis of the DDR2 E655K mutation and found that DDR2 E655K protein bound to the ubiquitin ligase E3 (Cbl-b), and consequently promoted cancer progression by decreasing the growth-inhibiting effects of collagen in NSCLCs. Therefore, identification of DDR2 mutations and investigation of their functions would help to reveal the underlying causes of lung cancer. In this study, we identified cases of DDR2 c.1745T>A (p.V582E) and c.1784T>C (p.L595P) mutations and evaluated the biological function of these mutations in NIH-3T3 and BEAS-2B cells. Our experimental findings have shown that these mutations have transforming activities, and that the DDR2 L595P mutation is a potential therapeutic target of dasatinib (Fig. 3). However, in a 3D proliferation assay using BEAS-2B cells with DDR2mutations, cells with DDR2 V582E mutation did not respond to dasatinib treatment, unlike DDR2 L595P mutant cells (S1 Fig. B). These findings indicate that the DDR2 V582E mutation site may not be an appropriate therapeutic target of dasatinib but could be a suitable target for other multiple kinase inhibitors. Table 4 shows the reported cancer-associated DDR2 mutation sites and their responses to dasatinib treatment.
Table 4.
Domain | Mutation site | Source | Dasatinib response | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
DS | L63V | Primary SCCs | Sensitive | [3, 15] |
DS-like | L239R | HCC-366 | Sensitive | [3] |
G253C | Primary SCCs | Sensitive | [3] | |
IJXM | I474M | Primary HNSCCs | Sensitive | [17] |
G505S | Primary SCCs | Sensitive | [18] | |
KD | V582E | Primary SCCs | Sensitive | Present study |
D590G | Primary HNSCCs | Sensitive | [17] | |
L595P | Primary SCCs | Sensitive | Present study | |
I638F | NCI-H2286 | Sensitive | [3] | |
T654I | HCC-366a) | Resistance | [19, 20] | |
T654M | HCC-366a) | Resistance | [19, 20] | |
R709X | Primary HNSCCs | Sensitive | [17] | |
I724M | Primary HNSCCs | Sensitive | [17, 18] | |
S768R | Primary SCCs | Sensitive | [3, 21] | |
G774E | Primary SCCs | Sensitive | [3] | |
G774V | Primary SCCs | Sensitive | [3] |
DDR2, discoidin domain-containing receptor tyrosine kinase 2; DS, discoidin domain; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; DS-like, discoidin-like domain; IJXM, intracellular juxtamembrane region; HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; KD, kinase domain.
Secondary mutation was acquired after culturing for 4 months.
In this study, we investigated the overall frequency of DDR2 mutations in a large clinical sample. We found two novel mutations, V582E and L595P, which play functional roles in cancer progression. Identifying DDR2 mutations and studying their effects would facilitate patient screening during clinical trials of lung SCCs. Our study provided in vitro evidence that DDR2 mutations could be potential therapeutic targets for the corresponding receptors of various tyrosine kinase inhibitors [3,20].
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning) (No. 2015R1C1-A1A02037066 and 2016R1A2B2012975).
Footnotes
Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Supplementary materials are available at Cancer Research and Treatment website (http://www.e-crt.org).
References
- 1.Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:505–27. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Langer CJ, Besse B, Gualberto A, Brambilla E, Soria JC. The evolving role of histology in the management of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:5311–20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.8126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hammerman PS, Sos ML, Ramos AH, Xu C, Dutt A, Zhou W, et al. Mutations in the DDR2 kinase gene identify a novel therapeutic target in squamous cell lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2011;1:78–89. doi: 10.1158/2159-8274.CD-11-0005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Belvedere O, Berri S, Chalkley R, Conway C, Barbone F, Pisa F, et al. A computational index derived from whole-genome copy number analysis is a novel tool for prognosis in early stage lung squamous cell carcinoma. Genomics. 2012;99:18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kim Y, Hammerman PS, Kim J, Yoon JA, Lee Y, Sun JM, et al. Integrative and comparative genomic analysis of lung squamous cell carcinomas in East Asian patients. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:121–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.8556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Miyamae Y, Shimizu K, Mitani Y, Araki T, Kawai Y, Baba M, et al. Mutation detection of epidermal growth factor receptor and KRAS genes using the smart amplification process version 2 from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded lung cancer tissue. J Mol Diagn. 2010;12:257–64. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Friboulet L, Li N, Katayama R, Lee CC, Gainor JF, Crystal AS, et al. The ALK inhibitor ceritinib overcomes crizotinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:662–73. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ding L, Getz G, Wheeler DA, Mardis ER, McLellan MD, Cibulskis K, et al. Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2008;455:1069–75. doi: 10.1038/nature07423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tyner JW, Fletcher LB, Wang EQ, Yang WF, Rutenberg-Schoenberg ML, Beadling C, et al. MET receptor sequence variants R970C and T992I lack transforming capacity. Cancer Res. 2010;70:6233–7. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Heist RS, Mino-Kenudson M, Sequist LV, Tammireddy S, Morrissey L, Christiani DC, et al. FGFR1 amplification in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:1775–80. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31826aed28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Weiss J, Sos ML, Seidel D, Peifer M, Zander T, Heuckmann JM, et al. Frequent and focal FGFR1 amplification associates with therapeutically tractable FGFR1 dependency in squamous cell lung cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:62ra93. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ramsey MR, He L, Forster N, Ory B, Ellisen LW. Physical association of HDAC1 and HDAC2 with p63 mediates transcriptional repression and tumor maintenance in squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2011;71:4373–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Labrador JP, Azcoitia V, Tuckermann J, Lin C, Olaso E, Manes S, et al. The collagen receptor DDR2 regulates proliferation and its elimination leads to dwarfism. EMBO Rep. 2001;2:446–52. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kve094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kawai I, Hisaki T, Sugiura K, Naito K, Kano K. Discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) regulates proliferation of endochondral cells in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;427:611–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.09.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xu C, Buczkowski KA, Zhang Y, Asahina H, Beauchamp EM, Terai H, et al. NSCLC Driven by DDR2 Mutation Is Sensitive to Dasatinib and JQ1 Combination Therapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015;14:2382–9. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rammal H, Saby C, Magnien K, Van-Gulick L, Garnotel R, Buache E, et al. Discoidin Domain Receptors: Potential Actors and Targets in Cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:55. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hedberg ML, Goh G, Chiosea SI, Bauman JE, Freilino ML, Zeng Y, et al. Genetic landscape of metastatic and recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:1606. doi: 10.1172/JCI86862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Iwai LK, Payne LS, Luczynski MT, Chang F, Xu H, Clinton RW, et al. Phosphoproteomics of collagen receptor networks reveals SHP-2 phosphorylation downstream of wild-type DDR2 and its lung cancer mutants. Biochem J. 2013;454:501–13. doi: 10.1042/BJ20121750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Beauchamp EM, Woods BA, Dulak AM, Tan L, Xu C, Gray NS, et al. Acquired resistance to dasatinib in lung cancer cell lines conferred by DDR2 gatekeeper mutation and NF1 loss. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13:475–82. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Terai H, Tan L, Beauchamp EM, Hatcher JM, Liu Q, Meyerson M, et al. Characterization of DDR2 Inhibitors for the Treatment of DDR2 Mutated Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer. ACS Chem Biol. 2015;10:2687–96. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.5b00655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pitini V, Arrigo C, Di Mirto C, Mondello P, Altavilla G. Response to dasatinib in a patient with SQCC of the lung harboring a discoid-receptor-2 and synchronous chronic myelogenous leukemia. Lung Cancer. 2013;82:171–2. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rothschild SI. Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-Beyond EGFR and ALK. Cancers (Basel) 2015;7:930–49. doi: 10.3390/cancers7020816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yashima H, Shimizu K, Araki T, Aomori T, Ohtaki Y, Nagashima T, et al. Assessment of DDR2, BRAF, EGFR and KRAS mutations as therapeutic targets in non-adenocarcinoma lung cancer patients. Mol Clin Oncol. 2014;2:714–8. doi: 10.3892/mco.2014.302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Payne LS, Huang PH. Discoidin domain receptor 2 signaling networks and therapy in lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9:900–4. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sasaki H, Shitara M, Yokota K, Okuda K, Hikosaka Y, Moriyama S, et al. DDR2 polymorphisms and mRNA expression in lung cancers of Japanese patients. Oncol Lett. 2012;4:33–7. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Miao L, Wang Y, Zhu S, Shi M, Li Y, Ding J, et al. Identification of novel driver mutations of the discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) gene in squamous cell lung cancer of Chinese patients. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:369. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shin A, Oh CM, Kim BW, Woo H, Won YJ, Lee JS. Lung cancer epidemiology in Korea. Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49:616–26. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ichikawa O, Osawa M, Nishida N, Goshima N, Nomura N, Shimada I. Structural basis of the collagen-binding mode of discoidin domain receptor 2. EMBO J. 2007;26:4168–76. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Terashima M, Togashi Y, Sato K, Mizuuchi H, Sakai K, Suda K, et al. Functional analyses of mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase genes in non-small cell lung cancer: double-edged sword of DDR2. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:3663–71. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.