Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
letter
. 2017 Oct 24;55(11):3300–3302. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01410-17

Evaluation of GenoType MTBDRplus by Use of Extracted DNA from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Specimens

Frieder Schaumburg a,, Georg Peters a, Eva Wardelmann b, Karsten Becker a, Jan Sperveslage b
Editor: Geoffrey A Landc
PMCID: PMC5654916  PMID: 28878006

LETTER

The number of cases of extrapulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex infection increased during the past waves of arrival of refugees in Europe (13). As extrapulmonary disease could be misidentified as a space-occupying malignancy, physicians might request only a histopathological examination and no microbiological culture. For that purpose, specimens are routinely formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE). We frequently experienced a diagnostic dilemma if acid-fast bacilli were seen, because performance of an ex post microbiological culture for susceptibility testing from FFPE specimens is not feasible. However, antimicrobial susceptibility testing is warranted, particularly in populations with a high prevalence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (4). Several nucleic acid amplification tests are available for the identification of M. tuberculosis and rifampin (± isoniazid) resistance, but these tests are licensed only for culture and pulmonary/sputum specimens (5). Here, we evaluate a line probe assay as a rescue approach for the identification of rifampin and isoniazid resistance in M. tuberculosis using DNA extracted from FFPE specimens.

Histopathological samples (n = 14) (Fig. 1) were prospectively collected from routine diagnostic procedures at the University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany, between 2015 and 2017. They were included in the study if either (i) acid-fast bacilli (Ziehl-Neelsen stain) or (ii) M. tuberculosis complex-specific gene segments were detected using the MYCODirect 1.7 assay (Chipron, Berlin, Germany). A detailed description of the methods is given in the supplemental material.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Study flow. In total, 14 tissue samples were positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MYCODirect array) using DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. These DNA samples were used for the GenoType MTBDRplus test (Hain) to identify resistance to rifampin and isoniazid. In parallel, mycobacterial cultures and susceptibility testing were done for 12 samples to assess the agreement between GenoType MTBDRplus susceptibility results and those obtained with the gold standard (culture).

All samples were positive in the MYCODirect assay, but only 30.8% (4/13; not done, n = 1) showed acid-fast bacilli (Table 1). Others have reported similar low (9.4% to 25%) detection rates of microscopy compared to nucleic acid amplification assays as well (7, 8).

TABLE 1.

Comparison of GenoType MTBDRplus using DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens and microbiological culturea

Specimen no. Specimen source AFB in microscopy DNA quality (largest amplifiable fragment [bp])b DNA result from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimen (GenoType MTBDRplus)
Microbiological culture result
Concn [ng/μl] Identification Rifampin Isoniazid Identification Rifampin Isoniazid
1 Vertebra Negative 600 16.2 MTB complex S S M. tuberculosis S S
2 Lymph node Positive 400 6.8 Nonevaluable NA NA M. tuberculosis S S
3 Liver Negative 400 8.7 MTB complex S S M. tuberculosis S S
4 Os sacrum Negative 300 6.37 Nonevaluable NA NA No growth NA NA
5 Lymph node Negative 100 131 MTB complex S S M. tuberculosis S S
6 Os sacrum Negative 200 5.8 Negative NA NA No specimen NA NA
7 Mamma Positive 400 54.9 MTB complex S S No growth NA NA
8 Lung Positive 300 148 MTB complex S S M. tuberculosis S S
9 Lymph node Negative 400 431 MTB complex S S M. tuberculosis S S
10 Lymph node Negative 400 351 MTB complex S S M. tuberculosis S S
11 Lung Not done 400 118 MTB complex S R No growth NA NA
12 Lymph node Negative 400 107 Negative NA NA M. bovis S S
13 Lung Negative 300 68.6 MTB complex S S No growth NA NA
14 Kidney Positive 100 2.94 Nonevaluable NA NA Not done Not done Not done
a

All samples were positive in the MYCODirect assay (PCR and hybridization). AFB, acid-fast bacilli (Ziehl-Neelsen stain); NA, not applicable; R, resistant; S, sensitive.

b

Data are from reference 6.

We extracted DNA from all M. tuberculosis complex-positive FFPE specimens (median concentration, 61.75 ng/μl; range, 2.9 to 431 ng/μl). The PCR product sizes of amplifiable DNA fragments in a multiplex DNA quality control PCR ranged between 100 and 600 bp (Table 1) (6).

All samples were tested with the GenoType MTBDRplus line probe assay. In total, 11 (79%) tests were evaluable; three (21%) tests were not valid because either the hybridization zone of M. tuberculosis-specific amplicons or the rpoB locus or the inhA locus or both were not developed (see the instructions for use provided by the manufacturer). The median DNA concentration of evaluable tests (107 ng/μl; range, 5.8 to 431) was significantly higher than in nonevaluable tests (6.4 ng/μl; range, 2.9 to 6.8; P = 0.02 [Wilcoxon rank sum test]) (Fig. 2). The concentration of DNA, consisting of both human and mycobacterial DNA, seems to be a suitable surrogate to predict evaluable test results.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Test performance according to the DNA concentration. DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens was used to perform the GenoType MTBDRplus test to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis and resistance to rifampin and isoniazid. The scatterplot compares the DNA concentrations of evaluable and nonevaluable test results. The bars show the upper and lower quartiles as well as the median (thick bar).

In 9 of 11 evaluable tests, we detected M. tuberculosis; all samples were susceptible to rifampin according to GenoType MTBDRplus testing. Isoniazid resistance was detected in one sample (Table 1).

In parallel, non-formalin-fixed microbiological specimens were obtained from 12 of the 14 patients and were sent for mycobacterial culture (Fig. 1 and Table 1) (9). The median time to positive culture of M. tuberculosis (n = 7) and Mycobacterium bovis (n = 1) was 15.5 days (range, 8 to 58 days). The line probe assay and microbiological culture yielded discordant results in five cases as follows: the GenoType MTBDRplus test result was negative/nonevaluable despite microbiological growth (n = 2), or the GenoType MTBDRplus test detected M. tuberculosis complex despite no growth (n = 3; Table 1). In general, the susceptibility of rifampin and isoniazid as detected by GenoType MTBDRplus was always confirmed by the culture-based antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

A similar study on extrapulmonary tuberculosis showed that the sensitivity and specificity of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay using DNA from FFPE tissue samples were 60% and 85.7%, respectively, compared to a nonmicrobiological case definition (8).

In conclusion, DNA from FFPE specimens can be used in GenoType MTBDRplus assays to detect isoniazid and rifampin resistance. This provides guidance to select the best antimycobacterium therapy if culture-based susceptibility testing is not feasible.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01410-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bozorgmehr K, Razum O, Saure D, Joggerst B, Szecsenyi J, Stock C. 2017. Yield of active screening for tuberculosis among asylum seekers in Germany: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Euro Surveill 22:30491. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.12.30491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mockenhaupt FP, Barbre KA, Jensenius M, Larsen CS, Barnett ED, Stauffer W, Rothe C, Asgeirsson H, Hamer DH, Esposito DH, Gautret P, Schlagenhauf P. 2016. Profile of illness in Syrian refugees: a GeoSentinel analysis, 2013 to 2015. Euro Surveill 21:30160. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.10.30160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Räisänen PE, Soini H, Vasankari T, Smit PW, Nuorti JP, Ollgren J, Ruutu P, Lyytikäinen O. 2016. Tuberculosis in immigrants in Finland, 1995–2013. Epidemiol Infect 144:425–433. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815001508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hargreaves S, Lönnroth K, Nellums LB, Olaru ID, Nathavitharana RR, Norredam M, Friedland JS. 2017. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and migration to Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 23:141–146. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Drobniewski F, Cooke M, Jordan J, Casali N, Mugwagwa T, Broda A, Townsend C, Sivaramakrishnan A, Green N, Jit M, Lipman M, Lord J, White P, Abubakar I. 2015. Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of molecular diagnostic tests for antibiotic resistance in tuberculosis. Health Technol Assess 19:1–188. doi: 10.3310/hta19340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.van Dongen JJ, Langerak AW, Bruggemann M, Evans PA, Hummel M, Lavender FL, Delabesse E, Davi F, Schuuring E, Garcia-Sanz R, van Krieken JH, Droese J, Gonzalez D, Bastard C, White HE, Spaargaren M, Gonzalez M, Parreira A, Smith JL, Morgan GJ, Kneba M, Macintyre EA. 2003. Design and standardization of PCR primers and protocols for detection of clonal immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene recombinations in suspect lymphoproliferations: report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BMH4-CT98-3936. Leukemia 17:2257–2317. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Polepole P, Kabwe M, Kasonde M, Tembo J, Shibemba A, O'Grady J, Kapata N, Zumla A, Bates M. 2017. Performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Int J Mycobacteriol 6:87–93. doi: 10.4103/2212-5531.201892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moure Z, Castellvi J, Sanchez-Montalva A, Pumarola T, Tortola MT. 25 May 2017. The role of molecular techniques for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in paraffin-embedded biopsies. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol doi: 10.1097/pai.0000000000000533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stop TB Partnership. 2014. Mycobacteriology laboratory manual, 1st ed Global Laboratory Initiative. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES