Abstract
RNA G-quadruplex (RG4) structures are involved in multiple biological processes. Recent genome-wide analyses of human mRNA transcriptome identified thousands of putative intramolecular RG4s that readily assemble in vitro but shown to be unfolded in vivo. Previously, we have shown that mature cytoplasmic tRNAs are cleaved during stress response to produce tRNA fragments that function to repress translation in vivo. Here we report that these bioactive tRNA fragments assemble into intermolecular RG4s. We provide evidence for the formation of uniquely stable tetramolecular RG4 structures consisting of five tetrad layers formed by 5ʹ-terminal oligoguanine motifs of an individual tRNA fragment. RG4 is required for functions of tRNA fragments in the regulation of mRNA translation, a critical component of cellular stress response. RG4 disruption abrogates tRNA fragments ability to trigger the formation of Stress Granules in vivo. Collectively, our data rationalize the existence of naturally occurring RG4-assembling tRNA fragments and emphasize their regulatory roles.
RNA G-quadruplexes (RG4) occur in vivo and have regulatory roles in mRNA metabolism. Here the authors show that the guanine residue stretches at the 5’ end of tRNA-derived stress-induced RNAs mediate the formation of tetramolecular RG4 structures, which play a role in the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression.
Introduction
G-quadruplexes (G4s) are guanine-rich nucleic acid structures composed of stacked planar G-quartet motifs, in which four guanine molecules interact with each other through Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding (Fig. 1a)1. Monovalent cations can stabilize G4 structures by coordinating the O6 atom in the channel of G-quartet. Whereas certain ions such as physiologically relevant Na+ and K+ cations with adequate ionic radii promote G4 assembly, those ions with smaller ionic radii, such as Li+, do not support G4 formation2,3. G4s are very stable under various conditions typically sufficient to unfold other nucleic acid structures, such as increased temperature or chemical denaturation (e.g., by urea and formaldehyde).
Biologically relevant G4s readily form in vitro and are unusually stable once formed. DNA G4s exist in vivo and are implicated in a wide range of diverse biological processes including transcription regulation, DNA recombination, genome stability and telomere maintenance4–6. For instance, telomeric DNA consists of the sequence “TTAGGG”, tandemly repeated up to 100,000 times in mammalian genomes, assembling G4s that can be visualized at telomeres by G4-specific antibodies in live cells7,8.
While much effort has been brought into the studying of DNA G4s9,10, RNA is equally capable of assembling into RNA G4s (RG4s)11,12. As RNA exists in a single-stranded state in cells, it is conceivable that it is more likely to form G4s as this structure does not have to compete with a double-stranded helix. Unsurprisingly, the TERRA, non-coding RNA (ncRNA) which arises from transcription of telomeric DNA, assembles into RG4s13. RG4s have also been identified within mRNAs and they are enriched within the untranslated regions (UTRs), regions playing various regulatory roles in mRNA metabolism such as mRNA translation7. Although some RG4s have been shown to stimulate translation14, most reports indicate that RG4s in mRNAs may function to inhibit translation acting as a roadblock for the scanning pre-initiation/ribosomal complexes or by attracting known translation inhibition factors15–17. Transcriptome-wide analysis indicates that thousands of mRNAs assemble RG4s in vitro18,19; however, the same RG4s are disassembled in living cells18. The biological significance of RG4s unfolding in vivo is largely unknown but it is suggested that their resolving by specific proteins, such as CNBP, stimulates/supports mRNA translation20.
While roles of RG4s in mRNA metabolism are under active investigation, the role of RG4s in small ncRNAs is just emerging. We have shown previously that mature cytoplasmic tRNAs are a source of a small RNAs which we termed tRNA-derived stress-induced RNAs (tiRNAs)21. tiRNAs are produced in response to various cellular stresses (e.g., oxidative stress, UV irradiation, and nutrient starvation) through RNA cleavage mediated by angiogenin (ANG), a stress-responsive member of the ribonuclease (RNase) A superfamily22,23. ANG cleaves mature tRNAs within the anticodon loop to produce 5ʹ and 3ʹ tiRNAs24. A subset of 5ʹ tiRNAs derived from tRNAAla and tRNACys, (5ʹ tiRNAAla and 5ʹ tiRNACys, respectively) inhibits protein synthesis by interfering with cap-dependent mRNA translation initiation. Mechanistically, these 5ʹ tiRNAs target cap-binding eIF4F complexes to displace them from the cap (m7GTP) structures of mRNAs25. Consequently, inhibition of translation initiation leads to the formation of stress granules (SGs), pro-survival cytoplasmic foci containing stalled pre-initiation ribosomal complexes26–28. The ability of these tiRNAs to repress translation and promote SG formation is dependent upon a stretch of guanine residues at their 5ʹ ends, which has been termed a 5ʹ terminal oligoguanine (5ʹ TOG) motif (Fig. 1b)25,29,30. Our initial studies suggested that the 5ʹTOG motif may assemble into a “G-quadruplex-like structure”30. Here we demonstrate the functional requirement of the 5ʹ TOG motif. The stretch of 5 guanosine residues within the 5ʹTOG interacts the 5′ TOG motifs of other tiRNAs, forming a tetramolecular RG4. We demonstrate that this structure is required for 5ʹ tiRNA activity, rather than simply RNA-protein interactions driven by sequence determinants. Further, we demonstrate that production of functional, tetrameric, RG4-assembling tRNA-derived fragments is an evolutionary conserved process. Our data highlight importance of intermolecular RG4 in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression.
Results
5′tiRNAAla assembles two alternative structural forms
Previously, we identified several molecular species of 5ʹ tiRNAAla that migrate aberrantly in native and denaturative gels and hypothesized that some of those species may assemble G4-like structures30. Indeed, 5ʹtiRNAAla exhibits a distinct and aberrant migration pattern in comparison to 5ʹtiRNAMet, a non-5ʹTOG-containing 5ʹtiRNA of the same size (Fig. 1c). On a denaturing gel stained with SYBR Gold, a dye detecting nucleic acids, 5ʹtiRNAMet demonstrates mobility of the expected 31 nts. While a fraction of 5ʹtiRNAAla also ran at 31 nts, a second band running at the size of 120 nts was also observed. The same phenomenon was also confirmed in native gels (Fig. 1c, right panels). We reasoned that the guanine residues in the 5ʹTOG-motifs of individual 5ʹtiRNAAla molecules might interact to form an intermolecular RG4 complex assembled by four individual 5ʹtiRNAAla strands explaining the observed migration of approximately ×4 the size of the expected monomer and the stability in the urea denaturant. To test this hypothesis, we stained native and denaturing gels with N-methyl mesoporphyrin IX (NMM), a molecule that has strong affinities for RG4 structures and fluoresces when excited by UV light31. The upper more slowly migrating band in 5ʹtiRNAAla stains with NMM, while 5ʹtiRNAMet or the lower 5ʹtiRNAAla band does not (Fig. 1c) supporting the hypothesis that the upper band is an RG4 structure and the lower band is a monomeric form of 5ʹtiRNAAla. To exclude the possibility that the NMM staining band was a contaminant generated during chemical synthesis of 5ʹtiRNAAla, we ran both 5ʹtiRNAMet and 5ʹtiRNAAla on denaturing gels and gel purified both bands separately (Fig. 1d). The resulting gel purified RNAs were re-analyzed on a denaturing acrylamide gel and visualized by SYBR Gold staining. When gel purified, a portion of the lower monomeric band converts into the upper more slowly running species and the converse was also true. These data demonstrate that, rather than being two distinct RNA species, these bands are two possible structural forms of 5ʹtiRNAAla.
If the upper more slowly migrating band is a tetramer tethered by an RG4, we reasoned that this structure can be manipulated through ionic equilibration with monovalent cations modulating RG4 formation. Those ions with radii large enough to be efficiently coordinated (K+, Na+, and NH4 +) support RG4 formation. Conversely, if the ionic radii are too small to be coordinated (e.g., Li+), RG4 structures will be depleted. Therefore, we equilibrated 5ʹtiRNAAla in various monovalent salts and analyzed the mobility on native or denaturing gels stained with SYBR gold to monitor total nucleic acid or NMM to monitor RG4 structures (Fig. 1e). In agreement with the upper band being a RG4 5ʹtiRNAAla tetramer, equilibration in Li+ led to collapse of the upper band to the monomeric form and loss of staining with NMM. In total, the apparent size, the ability to interconvert, the staining with NMM and the dependence upon specific ions strongly support the idea that 5ʹtiRNAAla can exist in monomeric and tetrameric forms, where the latter may adopt RG4 structure.
Equilibrium between RG4 and hairpin structures in 5′tiRNAAla
NMM staining assay is instrumental but not definitive to state that an RNA molecule adopts RG4 structure. To prove that 5ʹtiRNAAla can fold into RG4 structure and to obtain information on its topology in different solution conditions, we further employed biophysical approaches. NMR spectroscopy is a powerful tool to study RNA secondary structure since the imino proton “fingerprint” region of NMR spectra between 10 and 15 p.p.m. can provide information about the types of base pair formed. Imino proton peaks from 12 to 15 p.p.m. are characteristic of Watson–Crick base pairs, whereas those from 10 to 12 p.p.m. are associated with unpaired or unstacked residues and are generally broad and their observation requires working at low temperature32. Imino resonances from Hoogsteen base pairs, characteristic of G-quartet formation, are also found in 10–12 p.p.m. region. Figure 2a shows the imino region of the 1H NMR spectra of 5ʹtiRNAAla obtained in the presence of monovalent ions K+, Na+, or Li+. In the spectrum recorded in a buffer containing Li+ ions (Fig. 2a) three sharp signals are observed at 14.0, 13.4, and 11.8 p.p.m., each corresponding to one proton, broader signal at 13.0 p.p.m. arising from two protons and two smaller signals at 11.7 and 11.1 p.p.m. Overall, the spectra obtained in the presence of K+, Na+, or Li+ ions (Fig. 2a) are very similar in the region corresponding to Watson–Crick base pairs. Highfield resonances at 11.7 and 11.1 p.p.m. also appear in spectra recorded in the presence of K+ or Na+, although with different intensities.
The most thermodynamically stable secondary structure predicted for 5ʹtiRNAAla by RNA structure software package33 is a hairpin depicted in Fig. 1b. Generally, this structure agrees with NMR data where the presence of four G-C and one A-U Watson–Crick base pairs was identified using 2D NOESY spectrum. Additionally, the appearance of a strong cross peak between two highfield resonances at 11.8 and 11.1 p.p.m. in 2D NOESY spectrum (Supplementary Fig. 1a ) suggested the formation of a G-U base pair. Different intensities of these resonances in the three 1H NMR spectra most likely reflect different G-U base pair dynamics under the conditions utilized.
Next, we have focused our attention on the region between 10.5 and 12 p.p.m. corresponding to the Hoogsteen base pairs region. Very broad signals appeared in the spectra recorded in buffers containing K+, Na+ but not Li+ ions suggesting that they may originate from the RG4 form of 5ʹtiRNAAla. We have recorded 1H NMR spectra as a function of the temperature to examine whether the species of 5ʹtiRNAAla present in solution differ in their thermal stability as it is known that RG4s are distinguished among other nucleic acid structures by significant thermal stability. The NMR melting profiles of 5ʹtiRNAAla in the temperature range from 15 to 55 °C for samples recorded in buffers containing K+, Na+, or Li+ ions are shown in Fig. 2b, respectively. Broad signals observed in 1H NMR spectra recorded in K+ or Na+ buffers progressively sharpen in the Hoogsteen base pairs region as the temperature increases to 55 °C. At this temperature only signals around 11 p.p.m., which is characteristic of RG4 structure, are still clearly visible, while the other are completely undetectable. However, when 1H NMR spectrum of 5ʹtiRNAAla was recorded at 55 °C in the presence of lithium ions (Fig. 2b) no imino signals could be observed. The results of these experiments support the existence of RG4 structures in K+ and Na+ but not in Li+ solution.
One of the characteristic features of RG4s is significant solvent protection of the RG4 core that correlates with its very high thermodynamic and kinetic stability34,35. In 1H NMR spectra, it manifests itself as the slow disappearance of imino protons after solvent exchange from H2O to D2O. In RG4s, a complete replacement of the hydrogen bonded atoms with deuterium generally occurs after many hours, sometimes even after a few weeks or months. This is quite unlike DNA or RNA duplexes or triple helices, where the imino protons typically exchange in seconds or minutes. Figure 2c shows the comparison of the spectra of 5ʹtiRNAAla recorded in Na+ (left panel) and K+ (right panel) containing solutions at 45 °C in 90% H2O/10% D2O and after the exchange to D2O. In the spectrum recorded in D2O in the presence of potassium ions, signals attributed to the RG4, are still observed. However, there is only one resonance left in the NMR spectrum of the sample of 5ʹtiRNAAla in Na+ buffer after the exchange to D2O. This demonstrates the lower RG4 stability in the presence of Na+ than K+ ions, in agreement with stronger preference of RG4s for K+ over Na+ ions.
G-quadruplexes can adopt either a parallel topology, in which the backbone of each nucleic acid strand of the G-quadruplex run in the same direction, or an antiparallel topology in which the backbones run in opposing directions. All RNA quadruplex structures currently reported exhibit a parallel topology, with one recent exception, that is, the Spinach aptamer36. The use of CD spectroscopy to determine the topology of DNA G-quadruplexes is well established37 although its use in studies of RNA G-quadruplexes can be problematic because CD spectra of RNA parallel G-quadruplexes are very similar to those of A-form structures. Nevertheless, being aware of this ambiguity, we used CD experiment mainly to exclude the possibility of antiparallel topology of RG4 quadruplex. The typical spectra of antiparallel quadruplexes have a negative band at 260 nm and positive band at 295 nm. The CD spectra recorded for 5ʹtiRNAAla in the presence of K+, Na+, or Li+ ions displayed only a positive band at ~ 265 nm and small negative band at 240 nm (Fig. 2d). No positive peak at 295 nm was detected implying that RG4 5ʹtiRNAAla adopts a parallel structure.
A typical G-quadruplex stem is formed from at least two stacked G-quartets. In a structure of RG4 5ʹtiRNAAla information regarding a number of stacked G-quartets was deduced from1H NMR spectrum recorded at 55 °C in solution containing Na+ ions (Fig. 2b). In this spectrum only five well resolved resonances were observed suggesting that 5ʹTOG motif is engaged in quadruplex formation. Although the number of RNA strands involved in RG4 formation could not be directly inferred from NMR spectra, however, gel retardation experiments demonstrated that the slowly migrating band of 5ʹtiRNAAla was a tetramer. Therefore, the only possible interpretation of the NMR data is that RG4 5ʹtiRNAAla adopts highly symmetric, parallel tetramolecular quadruplex with five G-quartets (Fig. 3a).
We present our model as for interacting 5ʹtiRNAAla strands; however, there is no apparent reason why exclusively homogeneous tetramer would predominant in a mixed population of other TOG-containing tiRNAs. We have presented data that 5ʹtiRNACys also contains a TOG motif, but analysis of the genomic tRNA database (GtRNAdb, http://gtrnadb.ucsc.edu,38) reveals that certain tiRNAs derived from tRNAAsp, tRNAVal, and tRNATyr also contain TOG motifs (Supplementary Table 1 ). Therefore, we hypothesized that heterogeneous tetramers could form between different TOG-containing tiRNAs. To test this hypothesis, we equilibrated biotinylated tiRNACys with unbiotinylated 3ʹ truncations of tiRNAAla (24mer and 27mer) (Supplementary Fig. 1b ). The truncations served to distinguish between the tiRNAs on the basis of size without disrupting the TOG motif. tiRNACys was recovered with streptavidin-agarose and RNAs that co-purified with it were eluted by exchanging NaCl with LiCl, therby disrupting any RG4 structures. Eluted RNAs were analyzed on denaturing polyacrylamide gels stained with SYBR gold. Indeed, 5ʹtiRNACys was able to interact with and co-purify 5ʹtiRNAAla molecules, where as non-TOG-containing biotinylated oligonucleotide, Ctrl1 did not purify 5ʹtiRNAAla (Supplementary Fig. 1c). These data suggest the possibility that heterogeneous TOG-containing tiRNA tetramers can form.
In summary, our data indicate that 5ʹtiRNAAla can adopt two conformations, an intramolecular hairpin structure (Fig. 1b) and tetrameric RG4 structure (Fig. 3a). In K+ and Na+ solutions equilibrium between hairpin and RG4 structures exists, however, only hairpin structure forms in the presence of Li+ ions.
Importance of RG4 for 5′tiRNAAla biological activities
The biological activity of 5ʹtiRNAAla resides within the 5ʹTOG motif as judged by the abilities of tiRNA variants to trigger SG formation, displace eIF4F from m7GTP cap or inhibited translation of mRNA reporters25. While deletion of a single guanine (4G) or its substitution with a uracil (U4G) does not affect these activities, deletion or substitution of two or more guanines abrogated them (3G, UU3G) (Supplementary Table 2 25). Conversely, 5ʹtiRNAMet, which is biologically inert, can be “activated” upon addition of a 5ʹTOG motif (5ʹtiRNAMet(5G)). Analysis of these tiRNAs by SYBR gold or NMM on denaturing acrylamide gels demonstrates that only those tiRNAs which formed tetrameric RG4s retained biological activity (5ʹtiRNAAla (WT, 4G, U4G), 5ʹtiRNAMet(5G)) while inactivated tiRNAs have lost RG4s (5ʹtiRNAAla (3G, UU3G, AA3G), 5ʹtiRNAMet(WT)) (Fig. 3b). The loss of RG4 tetramer correlates with the loss of bioactivity.
The correlation between RG4 formation and biological activity with 5ʹtiRNAAla is intriguing, but does not prove that RG4 is required for activity. In these cases, to prevent RG4 formation, we introduced changes in the 5ʹTOG-motif that may unpredictably change their structures. Therefore, we cannot distinguish between sequence dependent and structure-dependent effects. In order to manipulate the structure independently of making sequence changes, we took advantage of the ability of ions to stabilize or destabilize RG4s. 5ʹtiRNAAla was equilibrated in RG4-permissive (Na+ or K+) or non-permissive (Li+) ionic buffers overnight as we previously showed, dramatically altered the ability of 5ʹtiRNAAla to assume a G4 conformation (Figs. 1e, 2). In vitro mRNA translation assays were performed with equilibrated tiRNAs by monitoring luciferase activity as a readout of translation efficiency. We found that 5ʹtiRNAAla equilibrated in RG4 promoting ions (K+ and Na+) retained translation repression activity; however, 5ʹtiRNAAla equilibrated in RG4 destabilizing Li+ ions abolished translation repression activity (Fig. 3c).
5ʹtiRNAAla inhibits translation via displacement of eIF4F from the m7GTP caps of mRNAs25. We analyzed whether this ability was altered in the ionic conditions affecting RG4 tetramers. We purified eIF4F complex on m7GTP agarose and challenged the resulting complexes with 5ʹtiRNAAla equilibrated in NaCl or in LiCl. In accordance with translation repression data, when 5ʹtiRNAAla cannot efficiently form RG4s, it is no longer able to displace eIF4F complex components eIF4E or eIF4G from m7GTP (Fig. 3d, Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). These data along with mutagenesis data (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Table 2) strongly suggest that RG4 structures within 5ʹtiRNAAla are necessary for translation inhibition.
Overexpression of ANG induces expression of tiRNAs and potentiates cells toward the formation of SGs29. Further, transfection of cells with 5ʹtiRNAAla triggers the formation of SGs. Interaction of 5ʹtiRNAAla with Y-box binding protein 1 (YB-1) is absolutely required for formation of tiRNA-induced SGs39. We asked if RG4 structures were required for this interaction and therefore SG formation in response to 5ʹtiRNAAla. Cell lysates were prepared using buffers containing either NaCl or LiCl and 5ʹtiRNA-protein complexes were purified using biotinylated tiRNAs or control RNAs equilibrated in NaCl or LiCl. Resulting complexes were analyzed by western blotting (Fig. 3e). YB-1 readily interacted with RG4-containing 5ʹtiRNAAla equilibrated in NaCl, but the interaction was reduced to background levels under RG4-non-permissive conditions. In contrast, FUS/TLS, a protein which interacts non-specifically with 5ʹtiRNAAla, was not altered and TIAR, a SG component, did not interact with 5ʹtiRNAAla under either condition. This suggests that the YB-1:5ʹtiRNAAla interaction may require RG4 structures and that SG formation may depend upon RG4s. However, due to the non-physiological levels of Li+ ions, we were not able to directly test this hypothesis using this approach.
To overcome the challenges presented by non-physiological ions, we used the 5ʹtiRNAAla variants bearing 7-deazaguanine (7daG), a guanine derivative, in the 5ʹTOG motif. Formation of RG4s via Hoogsteen base pairing strictly requires nitrogen at position 7 (N7) of a guanine, and its substitution to carbon atom in 7daG fails to support G-quartet formation (Fig. 4a)40,41. As RG4 formation requires adjacent G-quartets to stack upon each other, we reasoned that by disrupting Hoogsteen base pairing of adjacent guanosines, we might prevent RG4 formation. Therefore, we synthesized 5ʹtiRNAAla oligonucleotides in which the guanines at position 2 and 4 were substituted for 7daGs (5ʹtiRNAAla (7daG) TOG) (Fig. 4b), and their mobility in native and denaturative gels was compared with unmodified 5ʹtiRNAAla under RG4-permissive or non-permissive ionic conditions. In contrast to 5ʹtiRNAAla, 5ʹtiRNAAla(7daG) was not able to form RG4 under any ionic conditions on both denaturing (Fig. 4c) or native (Fig. 4d) gels as monitored by SYBR Gold or NMM. Thus, 5ʹtiRNAAla RG4 formation requires canonical Hoogsteen base pairing and presents an alternative method to test the reliance of RG4 formation on biological activity in the absence non-physiological ionic conditions.
We asked to what extent abolishing RG4 structures via 7daG substitution affected 5ʹtiRNAAla biological activities under physiologically relevant conditions. First, we found that preventing RG4 formation relieved 5ʹtiRNAAla’s ability to repress translation >20-fold in an in vitro translation assay (Fig. 5a). Second, upon transfection into U2OS cells, 5ʹtiRNAAla(WT) readily induced the formation of SGs, while this ability was abolished in the non-G4 forming 5ʹtiRNAAla(7daG) (Fig. 5b). It is possible that the RG4 structure provides additional stability to 5ʹtiRNAAla(WT) that is lost in the 5ʹtiRNAAla(7daG) upon transfection into cells. To account for this possibility, we extracted RNA from cells post-transfection and assayed for the presence of transfected tiRNAs. We found no differences between 5ʹtiRNAAla(WT) and 5ʹtiRNAAla(7daG) (Supplementary Fig. 3a). This correlated with the failure of non-G4-forming 5ʹtiRNAAla to interact with YB-1 (Fig. 5c) and displace eIF4E/eIF4G complexes from m7GTP agarose (Fig. 5d, Supplementary Fig. 3b). Non-RG4 forming 5ʹtiRNAAla(7daG) also failed to interact with known RG4 interacting proteins FXR1 and DHX36. Note that its interaction with Vigilin (VIG), Nucleolin (NCL), GRSF1, FUS/TLS, and TDP43 was unaltered suggesting that these factors interact in a sequence- (e.g., G-rich sequences) rather than a structure-dependent manner. Third, we asked whether 5ʹtiRNAAla(7daG) lost the ability to displace eIF4F components from the m7GTP cap. While 5ʹtiRNAAla(WT) readily displaced eIF4G and a portion of eIF4E, 5ʹtiRNAAla(7daG) or control RNAs were unable to do so (Fig. 5d, Supplementary Fig. 3c). These data, in combination with data generated using various ionic conditions, demonstrate that biological activity of 5ʹtiRNAAla is dependent upon the RG4 structure formed by the 5ʹTOG motif. The sequence of the 5ʹTOG motif is only important in so much as it grants the ability to form this structure, not through sequence dependent interactions with proteins
Tetramolecular RG4-tiRNAs are evolutionarily conserved
tRNA cleavage in response to cellular stress is an evolutionary conserved phenomenon42,43. In Arabadopsis thaliana, tRNA fragments accumulate to high concentration and their abundance gives an indication to their potential importance44. Three of these fragments, At69B, At90, and At112A (derived from tRNACys, tRNAAla, and tRNALeu, respectively) contain G-rich 5ʹ ends (Fig. 6a) and reported to inhibit translation of a luciferase reporter in vitro in a manner poorly understood mechanistically. We reasoned that they may inhibit translation through a RG4-dependent mechanism as human 5ʹtiRNAAla. We first analyzed the mobility of these tRNA fragments equilibrated in either Na+ or Li+ on denaturing gels stained with SYBR Gold or NMM. At90 readily formed a more slowly migrating RNA species consistent with tetrameric RG4 structures that were abrogated in the presence of Li+ cations (Fig. 6b). The other two RNA species either failed to form RG4 structures (At68B) or only an extremely minor fraction formed RG4 structure (At112A), correlating with the number of 5ʹ guanines (3 vs. 4).
We next tested if RG4 structures are responsible for translation repression activity of these RNAs. Each small RNA was equilibrated in RG4-permissive salts (NaCl) or RG4-non-permissive salts (LiCl). Translation repression activity was analyzed by their ability to repress a luciferase reporter. Without salt equilibration, we recapitulated previously reported data in that each tRNA fragment inhibited translation (Fig. 6c, NT). The ability of At90 RNA to repress translation was markedly reduced by treatment with LiCl (Fig. 6c), which correlated with destabilization of RG4 structures (Fig. 6b). This mirrors the results found with human 5ʹtiRNAAla (Figs. 3, 5), suggesting evolutionary conservation of the utilization of RG4-containing small RNAs to inhibit translation. However, regardless of ionic conditions, At68B and At112A retained their translation inhibitory activities, suggesting they utilize an alternative, non-RG4 pathway to inhibit translation. Nonetheless, these data also suggest that translation repression mechanisms relying on the assembly of intermolecular RG4 structures are present in distinct phyla.
Discussion
Here we show that 5ʹtiRNAAla assemble into tetrameric G-quadruplexes mediated by the 5ʹTOG motif. Through analysis of 5ʹtiRNAAla by NMR, circular dichroism, gel retardation and affinity to RG4-ligand NMM, we have developed a structural model of 5ʹtiRNAAla (Fig. 3a). Monomeric 5ʹtiRNAAla is capable of forming a hairpin in which the 5ʹ end, consisting of the 5ʹTOG motif, remains unpaired (Fig. 1b). Via Hoogsteen base pairing, guanines in the 5ʹTOG motif can interact with other monomeric 5ʹtiRNAAla forming G-quartets (Figs. 1a, 3a). This structure represents a new class of RNA G-quadruplexes in which stretch of five consecutive guanines is engaged in RG4 formation. Although, it is worth recognizing that these structures have been proposed to exist for DNA G445. The number of known RNA G-quadruplex structures is still very limited12 and large number of diverse RG4 topologies is still unknown, waiting to be explored. This structure represents an endogenous intermolecular RNA G-quadruplex.
Previous mutational analysis of 5ʹtiRNAAla showed that guanosines present in the 5ʹTOG motif are required for activity25. By introducing guanine to uracil transversions, we abolished activity of 5ʹtiRNAAla and speculated that it was due to the loss of interaction with a vital protein co-factor25,30. Through manipulation of ionic conditions to prevent RG4 formation or by substitution of nitrogen atom with carbon at the position 7 of guanosine, we have shown that the bioactivity of 5ʹtiRNAAla requires tetrameric RG4 formation. Thus, 5ʹtiRNAAla inhibits translation through displacement of eIF4F from the m7GTP cap of mRNA thereby triggering the formation of stress granules and abrogation of RG4 formation prevents these activities.
The use of the 7-deazaguanine is revealed to be a powerful tool in probing the relative contribution of Watson–Crick and Hoogsteen interactions in a biological action40,41. Using 7daG modified oligonucleotides, we were able to clearly distinguish between interactions which required Watson–Crick interactions and those that required Hoogsteen interactions. By combining this analysis with ionic equilibrations that prevented RG4 assembly, we can clearly distinguish between sequence specific and structure specific interactions (Fig. 5c). For example, YB-1, a protein required for 5ʹtiRNAAla induced stress granules interacts only with the RG4 form of 5ʹtiRNAAla, while GRSF1, a protein with no known function in 5ʹtiRNAAla bioactivity, interacts in a sequence dependent manner. The use of this strategy to determine the role of G-quadruplexes in biology holds great promise that is only begin to be realized.
Our initial mutagenesis also revealed that nucleotides located within the loop of the stem-loop play an additive role in activity. This raises the intriguing possibility that the RG4 structure serves as a mechanism to concentrate factors by acting as a molecular scaffold. A tetrameric 5ʹtiRNAAla brings four stem-loop structures into proximity. Through interaction with key proteins, a high-local concentration would be achieved. This is particularly exciting in the context of stress granule formation28,46. Stress granules form through phase transitions that are highly dependent upon high-local concentrations of certain key protein factors (G3BP1/2, TIA1/TIAR, and so on)47. Canonical SG formation requires activation of one of four stress activated kinases that phosphorylates the alpha subunit of eIF2 to inhibit translation initiation27. However, 5ʹtiRNA induced SGs are independent of eIF2α phosphorylation, while dependent on the activity of RNA-binding protein YB-139. We propose that concentration of YB-1 through aggregation of tetrameric 5ʹtiRNAAla may provide a mechanism for eIF2α phosphorylation independent SG formation (Supplementary Fig. 4).
Recently, questions have been raised about the prevalence of RG4s in eukaryotic cells. It has been argued that, despite immunofluorescence and functional data from other labs, in human and yeast cells RG4s are actively unwound18. It is possible that during mRNA biogenesis, specific factors bind mRNAs co-transcriptionally and keep RG4s unfolded. Upon export of transcript into cytoplasm, these factors help the ribosome to initiate on mRNAs by preventing assembly of RG4-roadblocks. In contrast to mRNAs that have a nuclear prehistory, RG4 assembly by tiRNAs is unique because it is dependent on cleavage of cytoplasmic tRNAs, molecules that are immediately available upon cellular stress. Therefore, we believe that investigation of RG4 formation during transient cell stress represents a promising and understudied field.
Methods
NMR spectroscopy
NMR spectra were collected on a Bruker AVANCE III 700 MHz spectrometer equipped with a QCI CryoProbe. The 5ʹtiRNAAla samples were dissolved in buffers containing (i) 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4/NaH2PO4, 0.1 mM EDTA, (ii) 50 mM KCl, 10 mM K2HPO4/KH2PO4, 0.1 mM EDTA, or (iii) 150 mM LiCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1 mM EDTA (pH 6.8). The 3 mm thin wall tubes were used with a final sample volume of 200 μl. The 5ʹtiRNAAla samples were annealed by heating to 90 °C and then slowly cooled down to the room temperature. It was verified that the relative ratio of signals in NMR spectra did not change over a few weeks. The final concentration of 5ʹtiRNAAla was 0.17 mM. A mixture of 90% H2O and 10% D2O was used for experiments undertaken to study exchangeable protons. The water signal was suppressed by excitation sculpting with gradient pulse48. The 2D NOESY spectrum was collected from 1840 scans in a buffer containing Na+ cations at 10 °C. For experiments carried out in D2O, the oligonucleotide was dried and redissolved in 99.996% D2O and D2O residual water signal was suppressed using the low power presaturation. Spectra were processed and prepared with TopSpin 3.0 Bruker Software.
Circular dichroism
The JASCO J815 spectropolarimeter was used to collect CD spectra. The oligonucleotides were dissolved in the same buffers as for NMR studies. Quartz cuvettes with a path length 0.5 cm were used with the sample volumes of 1300 μl to achieve a sample concentration of 4.3 μM. Spectra were collected in the range between 220 and 340 nm at 25 °C from three scans and a buffer baseline was subtracted from each spectrum. CD was expressed as the difference in the molar absorption of the right-handed and left-handed circularly polarized light. Δε, in units of cm2 mmol−1, was normalized to the number of nucleoside residues in the RNA samples49.
Salt equilibration and staining
RNA oligonucleotides were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT). To equilibrate, RNAs were diluted to 10 μM in indicated salt solution, heated to 95 °C for 10 min and allowed to cool to room temperature overnight. For analysis on acrylamide gels, 10 pmol or 50 pmol were ran through a gel and stained with SYBR gold or NMM, respectively. For SYBR gold staining, gels were post-stained in a solution of 1X SYBR Gold (ThermoFisher Scientific) in 0.5X TBE for 10 min. For NMM staining, gels were post-stained in a solution 0.1 mg ml−1 of NMM in 0.5X TBE for 10 min. Following staining, gels, were destained for 20 min in 0.5X TBE while rocking at room temperature. Gels were visualized using a 265 nm UV transilluminator.
In vitro translation assay
Nanoluciferase (Promega) was subcloned from pNL1.1 into pT7-5ʹ/3ʹMCS-A50 vector generated in house. pT7-NLuc-A50 was linearized with SacII and in vitro transcribed using T7 RiboMAX Express Large Scale RNA production System (Promega). Transcribed reporter RNAs were extracted with acid equilibrated phenol/chloroform and ethanol precipitated with 2.5 M ammonium acetate. Resulting RNAs were resuspended in DEPC-treated water and purified through Illustra MicroSpin G-25 column (GE Life Sciences). The resulting RNA was uncapped and contained a 50 nt synthetic poly(A) tail. In vitro translation assays were carried out in rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (Promega) following established protocols using 100 ng of in vitro transcribed RNA and 100 pmol of indicated tiRNA or control RNA. Reactions were incubated at 30 °C for 30 min. Luciferase activity was assayed using Nanoluc Luciferase assay Kit (Promega) on Luminometer (GloMax Explorer, Promega) according to manufacturer’s instructions (0.3 s measurement time).
m7GTP binding assay
Cell lysates were prepared from U2OS cells (ATCC, USA) by lysis with NP-50 Lysis buffer (10 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40) and eIF4F was assembled onto m7GTP agarose (Jena Bioscience) by tumbling for 2 h. Assembled complexes were further purified by washing with NP-40 lysis buffer to remove unbound proteins25. Assembled eIF4F complexes were challenged with 100 pmol of indicated RNA for 2 h at 4 °C while tumbling. Displaced proteins were washed away with NP-40 Lysis buffer and bound proteins were eluted with 60 μL of 1X SDS Loading dye. eIF4F displacement was assessed by analyzing eIF4G and eIF4E by western blotting.
Stress granule induction and quantification
Cells were grown on glass coverslips in 24-well dish until ~75% confluent. Cell were transfected with 250 pmol of indicated RNA. 6 h post-transfection, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldyhde in PBS for 15 min and permeabilized with ice-cold 100% methanol for 10 min and processed for fluorescence microscopy29. To ensure tiRNA stability, RNA was extracted from parallel transfected wells with TRIZOL. 10 μg of RNA was run on 15% denaturing acrylamide gels, SYBR gold stained and transferred to Hybond N+ nylon membrane. Blots were probed with streptavidin-HRP to detect biotinylated RNAs. Stress granules were monitored by co-localization of foci positive for G3BP1, eIF4G, and TIAR according to established protocols50–52. Only cells with granules co-staining for these markers were considered SGs and a minimum of three SGs per cell were required to score positive. Coverslips were mounted in polyvinyl mounting media and viewed at room temperature using a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope with a 40X Plan Fluor (NA 0.75) or 100X Plan Apo objective lens (NA 1.4) and illuminated with a mercury lamp and standard filters for DAPI (UV-2A–360/40; 420/LP), Cy2 (FITC HQ 480/40; 535/50), Cy3 (Cy 3HQ 545/30; 610/75), and Cy5 (Cy 5 HQ 620/60; 700/75). Images were captured with SPOT Persuit digital camera (Diagnostic Instruments) with the manufacturers software and compiled using Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.
RNA affinity chromatography
tiRNA binding proteins were affinity purified as previously described25,39. Briefly, U2OS cells were grown to ~75% confluence in a 15 cm tissue culture dish and lysed with NP-40 Lysis buffer and insoluble material was removed following centrifugation. Supernatant was split into individual tubes to which 250 pmol of indicated RNA oligonucleotides were added. Oligonucleotides contained a biotin moiety at their 3ʹ end. Oligonucleotides were tumbled with lysate for 2 h at which point 10 μL of streptavidin-agarose was added and tumbled for an additional 2 h at 4 °C. Unbound proteins were washed away with NP-40 Lysis buffer and bound proteins were recovered by eluting with 60 μL of 1X SDS loading buffer.
Heterogeneous tiRNA tetramer capture
100 pmol of biotinylated RNA (5ʹtiRNACys or Ctrl1) was equilibrated with 300 pmol of unbiotinylated 5ʹtiRNAAla(24mer) or 5ʹtiRNAAla(27mer) in 150 mM NaCl. Biotinylated complexes were recovered with streptavidin-agarose by tumbling at 4 °C for 2 h. Complexes on beads were washed 1X with 150 mM NaCl, 1X with dH2O, and 1X with 150 mM LiCl before resuspending in 50 μl of 150 mM LiCl and heating to 100 °C and allowing to cool to room temperature. Eluted supernatants were analyzed on 15% Urea-acrylamide gel and visualized by SYBR Gold.
Oligonucleotides
All oligonucleotides were synthesized and purified by IDT. Their sequences can be found in Supplementary Table 3.
Antibodies
Full table and dilutions for each antibody used can be found in Supplementary Table 4. YB-1 (Abcam: Ab12148), G3BP1 (Santa Cruz: sc81940), TIA1 (Santa Cruz: sc-1751), TIAR (Santa Cruz: sc-1749), eIF4G (Santa Cruz: sc-11373), Nucleolin (Santa Cruz: sc-9893), eIF4E (Santa Cruz: sc9976), Fus/TLS (Protein Tech Group: 11570-1-AP), TDP43 (Protein Tech Group: 10782-2-AP), Vigilin (Santa Cruz: 2404C3a), DHX36 (Protein Tech Group: 13159-1-AP), and GRSF1 (Aviva: ARP40382-P050).
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the Ivanov and Anderson labs for helpful discussion and feedback on this manuscript. This work is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NS094918 to P.I., GM121410 to P.I. and Paul Anderson, F32 GM119283 to S.M.L.) and the National Science Center (UMO-2014/13/B/ST5/04144 to Z.G.).
Author contributions
D.G. and Z.G. designed and undertook the biophysical experiments and analyzed the data. S.M.L. and S.M.C. performed functional studies and analyzed the data. P.I. conceived the project, supervised project, and analyzed the data. P.I., S.M.L., and Z.G. wrote the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Footnotes
Shawn M. Lyons and Dorota Gudanis contributed equally to this work.
A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02140-9.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01278-w.
Change history: A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML version of this paper.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Zofia Gdaniec, Email: zgdan@ibch.poznan.pl.
Pavel Ivanov, Email: pivanov@rics.bwh.harvard.edu.
References
- 1.Parkinson GN, Lee MP, Neidle S. Crystal structure of parallel quadruplexes from human telomeric DNA. Nature. 2002;417:876–880. doi: 10.1038/nature755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pinnavaia TJ, et al. Alkali metal ion specificity in the solution ordering of a nucleotide, 5’-guanosine monophosphate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978;100:3625–3627. doi: 10.1021/ja00479a070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pinnavaia TJ, Miles HT, Becker ED. Self-assembled 5’-guanosine monophosphate, nuclear magnetic resonance evidence for a regular, ordered structure and slow chemical exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975;97:7198–7200. doi: 10.1021/ja00857a059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bugaut A, Balasubramanian S. 5’-UTR RNA G-quadruplexes: translation regulation and targeting. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:4727–4741. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Balasubramanian S, Hurley LH, Neidle S. Targeting G-quadruplexes in gene promoters: a novel anticancer strategy? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2011;10:261–275. doi: 10.1038/nrd3428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huppert JL, Balasubramanian S. Prevalence of quadruplexes in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:2908–2916. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rhodes D, Lipps HJ. G-quadruplexes and their regulatory roles in biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:8627–8637. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schaffitzel C, et al. In vitro generated antibodies specific for telomeric guanine-quadruplex DNA react with Stylonychia lemnae macronuclei. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:8572–8577. doi: 10.1073/pnas.141229498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Biffi G, Tannahill D, McCafferty J, Balasubramanian S. Quantitative visualization of DNA G-quadruplex structures in human cells. Nat. Chem. 2013;5:182–186. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lam EY, Beraldi D, Tannahill D, Balasubramanian S. G-quadruplex structures are stable and detectable in human genomic DNA. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:1796. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fay MM, Lyons SM, Ivanov P. RNA G-Quadruplexes in biology: principles and molecular mechanisms. J. Mol. Biol. 2017;429:2127–2147. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Malgowska M, Czajczynska K, Gudanis D, Tworak A, Gdaniec Z. Overview of the RNA G-quadruplex structures. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2016;63:609–621. doi: 10.18388/abp.2016_1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Martadinata H, Heddi B, Lim KW, Phan AT. Structure of long human telomeric RNA (TERRA): G-quadruplexes formed by four and eight UUAGGG repeats are stable building blocks. Biochemistry. 2011;50:6455–6461. doi: 10.1021/bi200569f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Morris MJ, Negishi Y, Pazsint C, Schonhoft JD, Basu S. An RNA G-quadruplex is essential for cap-independent translation initiation in human VEGF IRES. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:17831–17839. doi: 10.1021/ja106287x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huppert JL, Bugaut A, Kumari S, Balasubramanian S. G-quadruplexes: the beginning and end of UTRs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:6260–6268. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kumari S, Bugaut A, Huppert JL, Balasubramanian S. An RNA G-quadruplex in the 5’ UTR of the NRAS proto-oncogene modulates translation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007;3:218–221. doi: 10.1038/nchembio864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wong HM, Payet L, Huppert JL. Function and targeting of G-quadruplexes. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 2009;11:146–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Guo, J. U. & Bartel, D. P. RNA G-quadruplexes are globally unfolded in eukaryotic cells and depleted in bacteria. Science353(2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Kwok CK, Marsico G, Sahakyan AB, Chambers VS, Balasubramanian S. rG4-seq reveals widespread formation of G-quadruplex structures in the human transcriptome. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:841–844. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Benhalevy D, et al. The human CCHC-type zinc finger nucleic acid-binding protein binds G-rich elements in target mRNA coding sequences and promotes translation. Cell Rep. 2017;18:2979–2990. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Anderson P, Ivanov P. tRNA fragments in human health and disease. FEBS Lett. 2014;588:4297–4304. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ivanov P, Anderson P. Stress-induced Ribonucleases. Ribonucleases Nucleic Acids Mol. Biol. 2011;26:115–134. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21078-5_5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lyons SM, Fay MM, Akiyama Y, Anderson PJ, Ivanov P. RNA biology of angiogenin: Current state and perspectives. RNA Biol. 2017;14:171–178. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2016.1272746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yamasaki S, Ivanov P, Hu GF, Anderson P. Angiogenin cleaves tRNA and promotes stress-induced translational repression. J. Cell Biol. 2009;185:35–42. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200811106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ivanov P, Emara MM, Villen J, Gygi SP, Anderson P. Angiogenin-induced tRNA fragments inhibit translation initiation. Mol. Cell. 2011;43:613–623. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Anderson P, Kedersha N, Ivanov P. Stress granules, P-bodies and cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2015;1849:861–870. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kedersha N, Ivanov P, Anderson P. Stress granules and cell signaling: more than just a passing phase? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2013;38:494–506. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Panas MD, Ivanov P, Anderson P. Mechanistic insights into mammalian stress granule dynamics. J. Cell Biol. 2016;215:313–323. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201609081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Emara MM, et al. Angiogenin-induced tRNA-derived stress-induced RNAs promote stress-induced stress granule assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:10959–10968. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.077560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ivanov P, et al. G-quadruplex structures contribute to the neuroprotective effects of angiogenin-induced tRNA fragments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:18201–18206. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407361111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ren J, Chaires JB. Sequence and structural selectivity of nucleic acid binding ligands. Biochemistry. 1999;38:16067–16075. doi: 10.1021/bi992070s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Varani G, Tinoco I., Jr. RNA structure and NMR spectroscopy. Q. Rev. Biophys. 1991;24:479–532. doi: 10.1017/S0033583500003875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Reuter JS, Mathews DH. RNAstructure: software for RNA secondary structure prediction and analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lane AN, Chaires JB, Gray RD, Trent JO. Stability and kinetics of G-quadruplex structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:5482–5515. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pandey S, Agarwala P, Maiti S. Effect of loops and G-quartets on the stability of RNA G-quadruplexes. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2013;117:6896–6905. doi: 10.1021/jp401739m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Huang H, et al. A G-quadruplex-containing RNA activates fluorescence in a GFP-like fluorophore. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014;10:686–691. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Randazzo A, Spada GP, da Silva MW. Circular dichroism of quadruplex structures. Top Curr. Chem. 2013;330:67–86. doi: 10.1007/128_2012_331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chan PP, Lowe TM. GtRNAdb 2.0: an expanded database of transfer RNA genes identified in complete and draft genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D184–D189. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lyons SM, Achorn C, Kedersha NL, Anderson PJ, Ivanov P. YB-1 regulates tiRNA-induced Stress Granule formation but not translational repression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:6949–6960. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Weldon C, et al. Identification of G-quadruplexes in long functional RNAs using 7-deazaguanine RNA. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016;13:18–20. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Weldon C, Eperon IC, Dominguez C. Do we know whether potential G-quadruplexes actually form in long functional RNA molecules? Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2016;44:1761–1768. doi: 10.1042/BST20160109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Thompson DM, Lu C, Green PJ, Parker R. tRNA cleavage is a conserved response to oxidative stress in eukaryotes. RNA. 2008;14:2095–2103. doi: 10.1261/rna.1232808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Thompson DM, Parker R. Stressing out over tRNA cleavage. Cell. 2009;138:215–219. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nowacka M, et al. Identification of stable, high copy number, medium-sized RNA degradation intermediates that accumulate in plants under non-stress conditions. Plant Mol. Biol. 2013;83:191–204. doi: 10.1007/s11103-013-0079-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sen D, Gilbert W. A sodium-potassium switch in the formation of four-stranded G4-DNA. Nature. 1990;344:410–414. doi: 10.1038/344410a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kedersha N, et al. G3BP-Caprin1-USP10 complexes mediate stress granule condensation and associate with 40S subunits. J. Cell Biol. 2016;212:845–860. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201508028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Protter DS, Parker R. Principles and properties of stress granules. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26:668–679. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hwang TJ, Shaka AJ. Water suppression that works. Excitation sculpting using arbitrary wave-forms and pulsed-field gradients. J. Magn. Resonance. 1995;112:275–279. doi: 10.1006/jmra.1995.1047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sosnick TR, Fang X, Shelton VM. Application of circular dichroism to study RNA folding transitions. Methods Enzymol. 2000;317:393–409. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(00)17026-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Aulas A, et al. Stress-specific differences in assembly and composition of stress granules and related foci. J. Cell Sci. 2017;130:927–937. doi: 10.1242/jcs.199240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Aulas, A. et al. Methods to classify cytoplasmic foci as mammalian stress granules. J. Vis. Exp. e55656, doi:10.3791/55656 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 52.Kedersha N, Anderson P. Mammalian stress granules and processing bodies. Methods Enzymol. 2007;431:61–81. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(07)31005-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.