Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2017 Oct 7;15:606–611. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.009

Illumina sequencing of the chloroplast genome of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.)

Erzsébet Nagy a, Géza Hegedűs b, János Taller a, Barbara Kutasy a, Eszter Virág a,
PMCID: PMC5655400  PMID: 29085876

Abstract

Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) is the most widespread weed and the most dangerous pollen allergenic plant in large areas of the temperate zone. Since herbicides like PSI and PSII inhibitors have their target genes in the chloroplast genome, understanding the chloroplast genome may indirectly support the exploration of herbicide resistance and development of novel control methods. The aim of the present study was to sequence and reconstruct for the chloroplast genome of A. artemisiifolia and establish a molecular dataset. We used an Illumina MiSeq protocol to sequence the chloroplast genome of isolated intact organelles of ragweed plants grown in our experimental garden. The assembled chloroplast genome was found to be 152,215 bp (GC: 37.6%) in a quadripartite structure, where 80 protein coding genes, 30 tRNA and 4 rRNA genes were annotated in total. We also report the complete sequence of 114 genes encoded in A. artemisiifolia chloroplast genome supported by both MIRA and Velvet de novo assemblers and ordered to Helianthus annuus L. using the Geneious software.

Keywords: Illumina sequencing, Chloroplast genome, cpDNA, Common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia


Specifications Table

Subject area Biology
More specific subject area Chloroplast genome of common ragweed
Type of data Table, figure
How data was acquired 2 × 300 Illumina MiSeq sequencing
Data format Raw reads in FASTAQ, complete cp genome in FASTA
Experimental factors 5 g young leaves were collected from young about 20 cm tall plants, and incubated for 48 h at 4 °C in dark
Experimental features Complete chloroplast genome of Ambrosia artemisiifolia
Data source location Keszthely-city, Hungary
Data accessibility Information and complete data are accessible in the NCBI under BioProject and BioSample ID: PRJNA383307, SAMN06761249. The raw reads are available in Fastq format in the NCBI SRA database at the following linkhttps://trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/sra.cgi?run=SRR6050242.
Complete chloroplast genome is available in GenBank under accession number:MF362689; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MF362689

Value of the data

  • Common ragweed is one of the most aggressive invasive weed species and the most dangerous pollen allergenic plant in large areas of the temperate zone.

  • Understanding the chloroplast genome of this species may indirectly support chemical control of it, since a large part of herbicides have their target genes in the chloroplast genome e.g. triazine-derivatives [1], diphenylethers [2] or the redox active Paraquat [3].

  • The reported data mean an important source for further chloroplast derived investigations like phylogenetic, photosynthetic or oxidative metabolism studies of the species.

1. Data

Intact chloroplasts were isolated from young leaves of Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Followed by cpDNA isolation and sequencing. The raw reads are available in Fastq format in the SRA database under the accession SRR6050242. The assembled chloroplast genome and annotated genes are available through NCBI nucleotide (MF362689).

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

2.1. Plant material and isolation of cpDNA

Seeds of an A. artemisiifolia plant grown in our experimental garden were sown on peat, and plants were grown in pots under greenhouse conditions.

In total, 5 g leaf tissue was collected from young, about 20 cm tall plants. To avoid high level starch accumulation the harvested leaves were incubated in Parafilm-sealed Petri dishes for 48 h at 4 °C in dark before chloroplast preparation. Chloroplast was isolated using the Chloroplast Isolation kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The intact chloroplasts were separated from the broken ones by centrifugation on top of 40/80% Percoll® gradient. To calculate the percentage of intact chloroplasts the ferricyanide photoreduction procedure was used [4]. The reduction of ferricyanid was measured spectrophotometrically at 410 nm. The percentage of intact chloroplasts of the preparation was assessed by comparing the rates of ferricyanide photoreduction with and without osmotic shock of the chloroplasts using the following formula:

BAB×100%=%intactchloroplasts

where A and B are the change in absorbance at 410 nm as a function of time (min) without and with osmotic shock measured by spectrophotometer. Analysis indicated that the 81% of the Ambrosia chloroplast preparation was intact and suitable for cpDNA extraction (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Analysis of the Ambrosia chloroplast preparation. Graph A: The degree of integrity of prepared chloroplast. It is assessed by comparing the rate of ferricyanid reduction upon illumination (at 410 nm) before (blue) and after (orange) osmotic shock. Graph B: Bars representing the slopes of the lines in graph A. The differences of slope values indicated that 81% of isolated chloroplast was intact and suitable for cpDNA extraction.

Isolation of cpDNA was performed as described by Nascimento Vieira et al. [5] with the following modification: after the addition of potassium acetate the sample was kept on ice for 2 hours. Then the procedure was continued according to reference till DNA dissolution in nuclease-free water.

2.2. Library preparation and sequencing

An Illumina paired-end cpDNA library (average insert size of 500 bp) was constructed using the Illumina TruSeq library preparation kit according to manufacturer's protocol. The cpDNA library was sequenced with 2 × 300 bp on MiSeq platform (Illumina, USA).

2.3. Chloroplast genome assembly

Prior to the de novo assembly of cp genome quality control of the raw paired-end reads (972,060 reads) were done using FastQC [6]. Based on FastQC report the trimming of low quality sequences (quality score < 20; Q20) were filtered out by using a self-developed application, GenoUtils, written in Visual Studio integrated developmental environment with C#. The remaining high quality paired end reads (864,583 reads) were assembled. To create full-length contiguous sequences without the guidance of a reference genome, we obtained de novo assembly by applying the overlap-based genome assembler MIRA (version 4.0.2) [7] and Velvet (version 1.2.10) [8]. The assembled contigs were ordered against the complete cp genome of Helianthus annuus L. as reference using the Geneious (version 9.1.6) (http://www.geneious.com) software [9].

2.4. Gene annotation

The web-based program Dual OrganellarGenoMe Annotator (DOGMA, http://dogma.ccbb.utexas.edu/) [10] was used to annotate the assembled genome using default parameters to predict protein coding genes, as well as tRNA and rRNA genes. The previously reported A. artemisiifolia transcriptome dataset [11] was used to identify the coding regions of cp genes [2]. Subsequently, BLASTN was used to further identify intron-containing gene positions by searching the de novo assembled cp genome.

The size of the complete chloroplast genome of A. artemisiifolia was found to be 152,215 bp (GC: 37.6%). The cp genome exhibited a quadripartite structure consisting of LSC and SSC regions of 84,399 bp and 17,958 bp respectively, separated by a pair of inverted repeats (IRa and IRb) each being 24,929 bp. A total of 114 genes were annotated including 80 protein coding genes, 30 tRNA genes, and 4 rRNA genes. Six of the protein coding genes and the 3' exon of rps12 are duplicated in the IR regions. Seven of the tRNA genes and all four rRNA genes are also duplicated in the IR regions. The presence of one or two introns were identified in 16 genes, which include 10 protein coding genes and six tRNA genes (Table 1, Fig. 2).

Table 1.

Classification of genes after chloroplast genome reconstruction. The annotated genes were categorized according to their function. Nominations: underlined: contains one intron, underlined bold: contains more than one intron.

Group of genes Genes
Protein genes
ATP synthase atpA atpB atpE atpF atpH atpI
Cytochrome b/f complex petA petB petD petG petL petN
Large subunit of RuBisCO rbcL
NADH dehydrogenase ndhA ndhB ndhC ndhD ndhE ndhF ndhG ndhH ndhI ndhJ ndhK
Photosystem I. psaA psaB psaC psaI psaJ
Photosystem II. psbA psbB psbC psbD psbE psbF psbH psbI psbJ psbK psbL psbM psbN psbT psbZ
Photosystem I assembly protein ycf3 ycf4
Proteins of unknown function ycf1 ycf2 ycf15
Ribosomal proteins
Large subunit rpl2 rpl14 rpl16 rpl20 rpl22 rpl23 rpl32 rpl33 rpl36
Small subunit rps2 rps3 rps4 rps7 rps8 rps11 rps12 rps14 rps15 rps16 rps18 rps19
RNA polymerase rpoA rpoB rpoC1 rpoC2
Translation factor infA
Other genes accD cemA clpP ccs   matK
RNA genes
Ribosomal RNAs rrn4.5 rrn5 rrn16 rrn23
Transfer RNAs trnA-UGC trnC-GCA trnD-GUC trnE-UUC trnF-GAA trnfM-CAU trnG-GCC trnG-UCC trnH-GUG trnI-CAU trnI-GAU trnK-UUU trnL-CAA trnL-UAA trnL-UAG trnM-CAU trnN-GUU trnP-UGG trnQ-UUG trnR-ACG trnR-UCU trnS-GCU trnS-GCU trnS-UGA trnT-GGU trnT-UGU trnV-GAC trnV-UAC trnW-CCA trnY-GUA

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Physical map of Ambrosia artemisiifolia cp genome. The graphical organization was created by OGDRAW[12].

Acknowledgements

fx1

This work was supported through the OTKA-K100919 (Hungarian Scientific Research Fund), Postdoc-2014-44 grant of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA) and the ÚNKP-2016-4-IV of the New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities.

Footnotes

Transparency document

Transparency document associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.009.

Transparency document. Supplementary material

Transparency document

mmc1.pdf (319.4KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Fuerst E.P., Norman M.A. Interactions of herbicides with photosynthetic electron transport. Weed Sci. 1991;39:458–464. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tripathy B.C., Oelmüller R. Reactive oxygen species generation and signaling in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012;7:1621–1633. doi: 10.4161/psb.22455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sedigheh H.G., Mortazavian M., Norouzian D., Atyabi M., Akbarzadeh A., Hasanpoor K., Ghorbani M. Oxidative stress and leaf senescence. BMC Res. Notes. 2011;4:477. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lilley R., Fitzgerald M., Rienits K., Walker D. Criteria of intactness and the photosynthetic activity of spinach chloroplast preparations. New Phytol. 1975;75:1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.do Nascimento Vieira L., Faoro H., de Freitas Fraga H.P., Rogalski M., de Souza E.M., de Oliveira Pedrosa F., Nodari R.O., Guerra M.P. An improved protocol for intact chloroplasts and cpDNA isolation in conifers. PLoS One. 2014;9:e84792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.S. Andrews, FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data, 2010.
  • 7.Chevreux B., Pfisterer T., Drescher B., Driesel A.J., Müller W.E., Wetter T., Suhai S. Using the miraEST assembler for reliable and automated mRNA transcript assembly and SNP detection in sequenced ESTs. Genome Res. 2004;14:1147–1159. doi: 10.1101/gr.1917404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zerbino D.R., Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008;18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kearse M., Moir R., Wilson A., Stones-Havas S., Cheung M., Sturrock S., Buxton S., Cooper A., Markowitz S., Duran C. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wyman S.K., Jansen R.K., Boore J.L. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:3252–3255. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Virág E., Hegedűs G., Barta E., Nagy E., Mátyás K., Kolics B., Taller J. Illumina sequencing of common (short) ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) reproductive organs and leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lohse M., Drechsel O., Kahlau S., Bock R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW—a suite of tools for generating physical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes and visualizing expression data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W575–W581. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Transparency document

mmc1.pdf (319.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES