Abstract
Neisseria meningitidis is the causative agent of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). A recombinant vaccine called Bexsero® incorporates four subcapsular antigens (fHbp, NHBA, NadA and PorA) which are used to assign a Bexsero® antigen sequence type (BAST) to each meningococcal strain. The vaccine elicits an immune response against combinations of variants of these antigens which have been grouped into specific BAST profiles that have been shown to have different distributions within geographical locations thus potentially affecting the efficacy of the vaccine. In this study, invasive meningococcal disease isolates from the western seaboard of Australia (Western Australia; WA) were compared to those from the south-eastern seaboard (Victoria; VIC) from 2008 to 2012. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of 131 meningococci from VIC and 70 meningococci from WA were analysed for MLST, FetA and BAST profiling. Serogroup B predominated in both jurisdictions and a total of 10 MLST clonal complexes (cc) were shared by both states. Isolates belonging to cc22, cc103 and cc1157 were unique to VIC whilst isolates from cc60 and cc212 were unique to WA. Clonal complex 41/44 represented one-third of the meningococcal population in each state but the predominant ST was locally different: ST-6058 in VIC and ST-146 in WA. Of the 108 BAST profiles identified in this collection, only 9 BASTs were simultaneously observed in both states. A significantly larger proportion of isolates in VIC harboured alleles for the NHBA-2 peptide and fHbp-1, antigenic variants predicted to be covered by the Bexsero® vaccine. The estimate for vaccine coverage in WA (47.1% [95% CI: 41.1–53.1%]) was significantly lower than that in VIC (66.4% [95% CI: 62.3–70.5%]). In conclusion, the antigenic structure of meningococci causing invasive disease in two geographically distinct states of Australia differed significantly during the study period which may affect vaccine effectiveness and highlights the need for representative surveillance when predicting potential impact of meningococcal B vaccines.
Introduction
Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is caused by the Gram-negative diplococcus Neisseria meningitidis (the meningococcus), an obligate human bacterium which cause both epidemic and endemic disease around the world [1]. The disease manifests rapidly as septicaemia and/or meningitis and may lead to death within hours [2]. Although IMD is rare, it remains a significant public health concern due to the high mortality and morbidity rate associated with the disease globally [3]. In Australia, the notification rate of IMD is currently 1.1 per 100,000 population although this ratio differs for the eight Australian states ranging from 0.5 to 1.3 per 100,000 population.
Meningococci expressing capsule serogroups A, B, C, W, X or Y are more frequently associated with invasive disease than acapsulate strains [4–6] and the distribution of serogroups fluctuates geographically [7]. Conjugate and polysaccharide vaccines providing protection against meningococcal serogroups A, C, W and Y are available. In Australia, since the implementation of the Meningococcal C (MenC) conjugate vaccine on the National Immunisation Programme in 2003, there has been a significant decline in the proportion of IMD caused by serogroup C nationally. Serogroup B has been responsible for ~80% of the annual cases from 2004 to 2014 (Fig 1). Because serogroup B polysaccharide mimics human antigens resulting in poor immunological responses, subcapsular protein-based vaccines against this serogroup have now been developed. The recombinant vaccines being used in the United States and the United Kingdom are Trumenba® [8] and Bexsero® [9], respectively.
The Bexsero® vaccine was made available on the Australian private market in 2013, registered for use in individuals aged 2 months or older, but is not currently part of the national immunisation schedule. The Bexsero® vaccine incorporates one variant each of four sub-capsular antigens: factor H binding protein (fHbp), Neisseria adhesin A (NadA), Neisserial Heparin-Binding Antigen (NHBA) and Porin antigen A (PorA) [10]. Variation in the structure and expression of these sub-capsular antigens amongst strains means the vaccine will not elicit immunity against all meningococcal strains. Vaccine coverage of Bexsero®, estimated by the monoclonal antibody based meningococcal antigen typing system (MATS) assay, has been shown to vary widely (66–91%) from country to country [11]. In the MATS assay, expression of the fHbp, NadA and NHBA antigens is compared to a minimum threshold of reactivity whilst the PorA antigen is genotyped by PCR and assumed to be covered if the variant belongs to the P1.4 subfamily. The Bexsero® antigen sequence type (BAST) scheme has been developed to reliably monitor the prevalence of vaccine antigens in circulating meningococcal strains [12]. Mowlaboccus et al. [13] have recently reported temporal changes in the BAST profiles of meningococci circulating in WA during the 2000–2014 time period. Despite no vaccine selection pressure, these changes were driven by variations in and within the circulating genetic lineages which resulted in variable (44–91%) predicted annual vaccine coverage over this time period.
To determine whether the observations made by Mowlaboccus et al. [13] also apply nationally, the current study compares the population and antigenic structures of meningococci circulating in WA to those in VIC, over a five-year period (2008–12). During this study period, the notification rate of IMD was on average 0.9 and 1.0 per 100,000 population in VIC and WA, respectively. WA is located on the western seaboard of Australia with a land area of 2.6 million square kilometres and a population of ~2 million inhabitants. VIC is located on the south-eastern seaboard of the continent with a land area of 0.24 million square kilometres and a population of ~6 million inhabitants (Fig 2A). Given the restricted number of BAST profiles predicted to be covered by the Bexsero® vaccine, this study is important in evaluating differences, if any, in the meningococcal population of these two Australian states and elucidate whether a vaccine such as Bexsero® should be implemented nation-wide or at the state level.
Methods
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
A total of 201 meningococcal strains isolated from disease cases were used in this study– 131 from VIC and 70 from WA (Fig 2). Isolates were passaged fewer than 5 times and were cultured under aerobic conditions with 5% CO2 at 37°C on GC agar (Oxoid) supplemented with 0.4% glucose, 0.01% glutamine, 0.2 mg/L of cocarboxylase and 5 mg/L of iron(III) nitrate. Serogroup-specific antisera were used to determine the serogroup of each isolate using slide agglutination.
Whole-genome sequencing
Genomic DNA extraction was performed using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, 69506) and stored as per the manufacturer’s instructions for DNA purification from Gram-negative bacteria. Extracted DNA was quantified using QubitTM fluorimetry and 1.0 ng of DNA was used as input to the Illumina Nextera XT library preparation protocol. The genomic DNA was tagmented, indexed by PCR and purified using AMPure XP beads. The “Library Normalization” step was omitted and the library pooling was performed after quantification of the library size using the LabChip® GXII service provided by the Australian Genome Research Facility. The pooled DNA library which contained genomic DNA (12 pM) from 30 meningococcal strains was loaded onto the Miseq and paired-end 250 bp reads were generated.
Sequence analysis for MLST and antigen profiling
Sequence analyses were performed according to the analyses used by Mowlaboccus et al. [13]. Briefly, the SRST2 pipeline [14] was used to determine the alleles at the MLST loci (abcZ, adk, aroE, fumC, gdh, pdhC and pgm) and the alleles for fHbp, nadA, nhba, porA and fetA. The nucleotide sequences were then translated and the peptides were assigned integers according to the PubMLST website (https://pubmlst.org/neisseria/)[15]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA v7.0 [16]. The BAST profiles were assigned integers according to the classification scheme described by Brehony et al. [12].
Statistical analysis
Categorical variables were examined by the Chi-squared test. GraphPad Prism 5 (Graph PadSoftware Inc., California) was used to perform the analyses. A 5% level of confidence was used and statistical significance was determined with a p value of < 0.05.
Results
Serogroup distribution
Of the 224 notified IMD cases from VIC during 2008–2012, a total of 131 (58%) cases were culture positive and these isolates were sequenced. A total of 70 isolates from Western Australia, which represented 67% of the 104 notified IMD cases during the same time-frame, were also sequenced. Disease pattern with age groups was similar for the two regions during this time period and indicated a period of endemic disease (S1 Fig). No significant difference was observed (p>0.05) in serogroup distributions of the sequenced disease-causing isolates from the two states (Table 1). Serogroup B was the most common cause of IMD in both states.
Table 1. Serogroup distribution in VIC and WA (2008–2012).
VIC | WA | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Serogroup | No. of isolates | Proportion | No. of isolates | Proportion | p value* |
B | 111 | 84.7% | 59 | 84.3% | 0.160 |
C | 4 | 3.1% | 5 | 7.1% | 0.115 |
W | 4 | 3.1% | 1 | 1.4% | 0.315 |
Y | 12 | 9.2% | 5 | 7.1% | 0.192 |
Subtotal | 131 | 100.0% | 70 | 100.0% |
* The p-value was calculated using the Fisher’s exact test.
Distribution of MLST Clonal Complexes
A total of 52 STs and 13 clonal complexes (cc) were identified amongst the Victorian isolates. Three of the STs (ST-4267, ST-5118 and ST-novel) were not assigned to any known clonal complex. In the Western Australian collection, a total of 40 STs and 12 clonal complexes were identified. Twelve of the STs identified in this study had not previously been reported globally (11 from VIC and 1 from WA). Isolates belonging to cc22, cc103 and cc1157 were identified in VIC only whilst isolates belonging to cc60 and cc212 were identified in WA only. The two states shared ten clonal complexes (Fig 2B)–cc11, cc23, cc32, cc35, cc162, cc167, cc213, cc269, cc461 and cc41/44. No significant difference was observed in the prevalence of clonal complexes in the two states (S1 Table). The majority of disease in both states was caused by cc41/44 isolates, which represented one-third of the collection in each state (44 isolates in VIC and 23 isolates in WA). However, the predominant ST for this cc was ST-6058 in VIC (n = 11) and ST-146 in WA (n = 7) (S2 Table). A decreasing trend in the annual prevalence of cc41/44 isolates was observed in both states (Fig 3) over the study period. A high proportion of disease in both regions was also caused by isolates belonging to the hypervirulent lineages cc32, cc213 and cc269 with at least 8 isolates identified in each state (S1 Table).
In this study, serogroup C was mainly associated with cc11 and cc212; serogroup W with cc22 and cc167; and serogroup Y with cc22, cc23, cc103 and cc167. The remaining identified lineages were associated with serogroup B. Capsule switching events were observed in cc22 (W→Y) and cc167 (Y→W).
Distribution of FetA and PorA types
A total of 60 fetA (NEIS1963) alleles corresponding to 21 FetA types were identified in the entire collection. Eleven FetA types were found in both states. Of the remaining 10, six were unique to VIC and four to WA (Fig 4A). Both states shared the same predominant FetA type, F1-5. In VIC and WA, respectively, 31% (n = 41/131) and 29% (n = 20/70) of isolates possessed alleles for the F1-5 FetA type. Of these 61 isolates, 57 isolates belonged to cc41/44 and the remaining four isolates belonged individually to cc103, cc213, cc269 and to an unassigned cc.
Of the 43 PorA types identified, 15 were found in both states, 15 were identified in VIC only and 13 were identified in WA only (Fig 4B). The most common PorA type in VIC was P1.7,16–26 (Table 2) which was identified in cc32 isolates only. In WA, P1.22,14–6 was the most common PorA type and was identified in cc41/44 isolates only. The P1.7–2,4 PorA type incorporated in the Bexsero® vaccine was identified in 11% (n = 15/131) of VIC isolates and 7% (n = 5/70) of WA isolates. This PorA type was identified in 15 isolates from cc41/44, three isolates from cc11, one isolate from cc32 and one isolate from cc162.
Table 2. The predominant antigenic variants of fHbp, NHBA, NadA and PorA identified in VIC and WA (2008–2012).
Australian State | Antigen | No. of unique peptide variants | Most prevalent variant | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Peptide variant | Number (%) | |||
VIC (n = 131) |
fHbp | 30 | fHbp-1.4 | 16 (12) |
NHBA | 20 | NHBA-2 | 36 (27) | |
NadA | 7 | no peptidea | 108 (82) | |
PorA | 30 | P1.7,16–26 | 17 (13) | |
WA (n = 70) |
fHbp | 22 | fHbp-2.19 | 13 (19) |
NHBA | 21 | NHBA-3; NHBA-43 | 11 (16) | |
NadA | 6 | no peptidea | 58 (83) | |
PorA | 28 | P1.22,14–6 | 11 (16) |
aIncludes isolates in which the nadA gene was either not detected or the gene contained a frame-shift mutation or an insertion element.
A total of 75 PorA:FetA profiles were identified in this collection. The predominant PorA:FetA profile in VIC was P1.7,16–26:F3-3 (n = 17) which was exclusively found in cc32 isolates. The predominant PorA:FetA profile in WA was P1.22,14–6:F1-5 (n = 10) and was exclusively associated with cc41/44 isolates.
Distribution of the fHbp, NHBA and NadA
Other than the PorA antigen, the Bexsero® vaccine contains 3 additional major surface antigens–fHbp, NHBA and NadA in addition to an outer membrane vesicle component containing many uncharacterised minor antigens.
A total of 30 and 18 previously described fHbp peptides were identified in VIC and WA, respectively. Fifteen fHbp peptides were unique to VIC and three fHbp peptides were detected in WA only (Fig 5). The predominant fHbp peptide in VIC was fHbp-1.4 which was identified in 16 isolates–thirteen from cc41/44, one from cc35, one from cc103 and one from cc162. The predominant fHbp peptide in WA was fHbp-2.19 which was identified in 13 isolates–ten from cc41/44, two from cc269 and one from cc212. The fHbp-1.1 peptide incorporated in the Bexsero® vaccine was identified in only seven isolates–three cc32 isolates from each state and one cc162 isolate from WA. Furthermore, the proportion of isolates harbouring alleles for the fHbp-1 variant was significantly lower in WA (p<0.05). This difference was particularly noticeable in 2012, when only two isolates from WA compared to eleven isolates from VIC harboured alleles for the fHbp-1 variant (S3 Table).
The nhba gene (NEIS2109) was detected in all isolates. A total of 20 and 21 NHBA peptides were identified in VIC and WA, respectively. Fourteen of these peptides were identified in both regions. The NHBA-2 peptide incorporated in the Bexsero® vaccine was the predominant NHBA peptide in VIC and was identified in 27% (n = 36/131) of the Victorian collection. A lower frequency was observed in WA where only 10% (n = 7/70) of isolates harboured genes encoding the NHBA-2 peptide. All isolates possessing alleles for the NHBA-2 peptide were from cc41/44 (Fig 6). NHBA-3 and NHBA-43 were the most common NHBA peptides in WA and were each identified in 11 isolates. All isolates possessing alleles for NHBA-3 and NHBA-43 belonged to cc32 and cc41/44 respectively.
The nadA gene (NEIS1969) was absent in all isolates belonging to cc22, cc23, cc35, cc60, cc103, cc162, cc167, cc212, cc269, cc461 and cc41/44. A total of 7 nadA alleles were detected in the forty-eight isolates harbouring this gene. These isolates were from cc32 (n = 31), cc11 (n = 8), cc213 (n = 8) and cc1157 (n = 1). The presence or absence of nadA correlated with particular lineages with the exception of cc213 where 36% (n = 8/22) harboured this gene whilst the remainder lacked the entire locus. Twenty-seven isolates (26 from cc32 and one from cc11) encoded a nadA allele 19, generating a putative atypical protein (NadA-100 peptide) with a longer anchor domain and an altered distal portion [17]. Of these isolates, nineteen were from VIC, including the cc11 isolate, and eight were identified in WA. Four isolates (three from VIC and one from WA), all belonging to cc11:ST-11, possessed a nadA allele 29 which contains the insertion sequence IS1301, and would consequently be unable to express an intact NadA peptide. Eight isolates (five from VIC and three from WA) harboured nadA alleles with internal stop codons and would unlikely be able to express a peptide. Therefore, only nine isolates were considered positive for the NadA antigen. Alleles for the NadA-1.1 peptide were identified in six isolates (two from VIC and four from WA) which were from cc32 (n = 5) and cc213 (n = 1), all expressing a serogroup B capsule. Alleles for the NadA-2/3.2 peptide were identified in the remaining three isolates (two from VIC and one from WA), all of which belonged to cc11 (serogroup C, ST-11).
Prevalence of the antigenic variants incorporated in the Bexsero® vaccine and BAST distribution
A significantly larger proportion of isolates harbouring alleles encoding the exact antigenic variants for one or more of the four major immunogenic peptides incorporated in the Bexsero® vaccine (fHbp-1.1, NHBA-2, NadA-2/3.8 and P1.7–2,4) was identified in VIC (p<0.05) (Table 3). This difference was mainly due to the higher proportion of isolates harbouring alleles for the NHBA-2 peptide observed in VIC compared to WA (p<0.01). All isolates harbouring alleles for fHbp-1.1 or NHBA-2 expressed a serogroup B capsule. Of the 20 isolates harbouring alleles for the Bexsero® specific PorA vaccine antigen, seventeen expressed a serogroup B capsule whilst the remaining three isolates expressed a serogroup C capsule. These three isolates, all from VIC, belonged to the ST-11 lineage and were identical at the fHbp and nhba loci, encoding for fHbp-2.118 and NHBA-20. No isolates harbouring alleles for three or four Bexsero® specific vaccine antigenic variants were observed. One cc32 isolate, from WA, harboured alleles for fHbp-1.1 and P1.7–2,4. Fourteen isolates (11 from VIC and 3 from WA), all belonging to cc41/44, harboured alleles for NHBA-2 and P1.7–2,4. None of the isolates harboured alleles for fHbp-1.1 and NHBA-2 concurrently.
Table 3. Prevalence of the exact antigenic variants of fHbp, NHBA, NadA and PorA incorporated in the Bexsero® vaccine.
All Serogroups | Serogroup B | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antigen | VIC (n = 131) |
WA (n = 70) |
VIC (n = 111) |
WA (n = 59) |
||
Number (%) | Number (%) | p-value | Number (%) | Number (%) | p-valueb | |
fHbp-1.1 | 3 (2) | 4 (6) | 0.14 | 3 (3) | 4 (7) | 0.14 |
NHBA-2 | 36 (27) | 7 (10) | 0.002 | 36 (32) | 7 (12) | 0.002 |
NadA-2/3.8 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 |
P1.7–2,4 | 15 (11) | 5 (7) | 0.13 | 12 (11) | 5 (8) | 0.19 |
Eithera | 43 (33) | 12 (17) | 0.008 | 40 (36) | 12 (20) | 0.015 |
aIncludes isolates possessing alleles for either one or more exact antigenic variants of the vaccine antigens.
bThe p-value was calculated using the Fisher’s exact test.
A total of 66 and 51 BASTs were identified in VIC and WA, respectively. Only nine BASTs were simultaneously observed in the two states. The most common BAST identified in VIC was fHbp-2.19:NHBA-2:NadA-absent:P1.18–1,34 (BAST-315) which was represented by 10 isolates, all of which belonged to cc41/44 (eight ST-6058, one ST-409 and one ST-9991) and expressed a serogroup B capsule. In contrast, the most common BAST identified in WA was fHbp-2.19:NHBA-43:NadA-absent:P1.22,14–6 (BAST-933) which was represented by 8 isolates, all of which belonged to cc41/44 (four ST-146 and two ST-10511) and expressed a serogroup B capsule.
Discussion
IMD is a notifiable disease in Australia and since 1994, the National Neisseria Network has been supplying information annually on the serogroup, serotype (PorB typing), serosubtype (PorA typing) and antibiotic susceptibility of invasive meningococci isolated from the eight Australian states and territories as part of the Australian Meningococcal Surveillance Programme [18]. Unlike previous epidemiological studies on meningococci circulating around Australia [13, 19–33], this current study is the first to use WGS to compare the MLST and BAST profiles of invasive meningococci from two states found on either side of the Australian continent over the same 5-year period (2008–2012). With the exception of FetA, the typing data used for the WA isolates have previously been published by our group [13].
Serogroup distribution was similar in both states and meningococci expressing serogroup B capsule were predominant in each state. No significant differences were observed for the distribution of clonal complexes between the two states with the exception of cc22 (S1 Table). The seven isolates belonging to cc22 were identified in VIC only and expressed either a serogroup W (n = 4) or a serogroup Y (n = 3) capsule. Furthermore, cc103 and cc1157 were unique to VIC and cc60 and cc212 were unique to WA. However, since less than three isolates belonged to each of these lineages (S1 Table), most likely representing sporadic cases, the exclusiveness of these clonal complexes was not statistically supported (p>0.05). Also, the short time-period over which the analysis was conducted was inadequate to corroborate the restriction of a particular clonal complex to one region.
Clonal complex 41/44 was the predominant lineage, representing one-third of the meningococcal population, in each jurisdiction during the analysed time-period but the predominant ST for this lineage was locally different–ST-6058 in VIC and ST-146 in WA. Despite the high prevalence reported in this study, none of these two STs have so far been reported as the causative agent of an IMD outbreak. The PubMLST database contains 9 records of ST-6058 and 11 records of ST-146 associated with invasive disease, most of which were identified in Europe in the 21st century except one ST-146 isolate which caused disease in the Netherlands as early as 1980. Given that ST-146 was already dominant in WA prior to 2008 [13] and since ST-6058 differs from ST-146 at three housekeeping loci (abcZ [4 SNPs], adk [4 SNPs] and pdhC [7 SNPs]), it can be hypothesized that the propagation of these two STs of the same clonal complex occurred in parallel in each region. Longitudinal studies have reported that meningococcal strains of a particular ST can persist in a population for decades [34–36]. However, since the majority of isolates in the PubMLST database have a more recent provenance and this database does not necessarily provide a detailed picture of past events pre-2008 or represent all geographic regions equally well, this remains an untested hypothesis.
In addition to the MLST profiles, the PorA:FetA and BAST profiles identified in this collection were diverse. Only 16% (12/75) of the PorA:FetA and 8% (9/108) of the BAST profiles were shared by the two jurisdictions although no significant difference in clonal complex distribution was observed, suggesting that the antigenic profiles of meningococci circulating in these two states were different during 2008–2012. Differences in the antigenic structure of meningococci may be attributed to differences in the host population. For example, Boan et al. [31] have previously reported an independent association of fHbp-2 with aboriginal cases and hence, the difference in BAST distribution in VIC and WA may be due to the different proportions of aboriginal population inhabiting the two regions (0.9% in VIC vs 3.8% in WA as at June 2011, Australian Bureau of Statistics). In addition to demographic factors, the difference in BAST profiles may also reflect the separate introduction, and successful diversification, of distinct meningococcal clones through international travel in each state.
The dissemination of invasive meningococci within a certain population depends on the survival and effective transmission between human hosts and the ability to become established in the nasopharynx by evading natural immunity. The ability to evade host immunity through ongoing genetic diversification is clearly reflected in the high diversity of BAST profiles detected within a small region [34]. Previous studies, conducted in Europe, have shown that the meningococcal population structure varies geographically and is genetically different even for neighbouring countries [12, 37, 38]. However, this current study shows that, in the case of Australia, no significant difference in the distribution of clonal complexes was observed between VIC and WA despite the relatively larger separation of ~4100 km, when compared to Europe. This may be the result of the shorter time frame of 5 years examined in this study suggesting that a longitudinal study of greater duration is warranted. Furthermore, unlike the study conducted by Abad et al. [37] which showed that variations in predicted strain coverage of Bexsero® in Spain were attributed to the prevalence of clonal complexes, we report that although cc41/44 predominated in both states, the STs and BAST profiles of strains circulating separately in VIC and WA were different. The predominant BAST (BAST-315) in VIC is covered by the NHBA-2 antigen while the predominant BAST (BAST-933) in WA is not covered by any of the four antigens.
Despite considerable diversity in BAST profiles, there is evidence that only one cross-reactive variant from the four vaccine antigens is sufficient to provide immune protection [11]. The presence of at least one of the following antigenic variants proposed by Mowlaboccus et al. [13], derived from the positive results of a MATS ELISA assay, was used to predict the vaccine coverage for the two Australian states: fHbp-1 (except fHbp-1.13), NHBA-1, NHBA-2, NadA-1, NadA-2/3, P1.4 subfamily PorA. Using these parameters, the predicted vaccine coverage in WA (47.1% [95% CI: 41.1–53.1%]) was significantly lower than that in VIC (66.4% [95% CI: 62.3–70.5%]) (p<0.05). This difference was mainly due to the higher prevalence of the NHBA-2 variant in meningococcal isolates from VIC (Fig 6) and the smaller proportion of meningococci harbouring the fHbp-1 variant in WA (Fig 5). These estimates of predicted vaccine coverage for these states during the studied period was lower than the national coverage of 76% predicted by the MATS ELISA by Nissen et al. [39] in a study of 373 serogroup B meningococci isolated in Australia during 2007–2011. The difference in predicted coverage is most likely due to the under-representation of Victorian and Western Australian isolates used in the Nissen et al. study [39]. Hence, in the case of Australia, meningococcal STs and BASTs do not necessarily prevail throughout the country over short time frames but may rather be restricted to the western or the eastern seaboard. Future molecular surveillance is required to understand these spatial and temporal changes in meningococcal population diversity across the country over long periods of time to examine whether administering a recombinant vaccine like Bexsero® should be considered at a national level or if this decision should be rather taken at a state level.
Lastly, while outbreaks of serogroup W:cc11 occurred in other parts of the world during the period of this study [40, 41], no such strain was detected until 2013 in either Victoria [42, 43] or Western Australia [13]. Since 2013, there has been an increase in IMD caused by serogroup W all-round the continent which resulted in this serogroup becoming the predominant meningococcal serogroup in Australia in 2016 [44]. Clonal expansion of penicillin-resistant MenW:cc11 isolates harbouring the penA_253 allele has recently been reported in WA [45] but this allele was identified in only one isolate (serogroup Y, cc22, VIC) from our collection which was also resistant to penicillin.
Although IMD is rare, disease patterns vary widely not only geographically but also temporally, and therefore ongoing surveillance is of utmost importance to identify the causes of potential outbreaks for rapid intervention. As this study shows that the antigenic structure of N. meningitidis is different in Victoria and Western Australia, we encourage WGS of meningococci from the other Australian states to better elucidate the molecular epidemiology of strains circulating around Australia before recommending the national implementation of a new meningococcal vaccine.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
S.M. is supported by an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship award from The University of Western Australia. Collection of meningococcal isolates is facilitated by the National Neisseria Network.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
S.M. is supported by an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship award from The University of Western Australia. Collection of meningococcal isolates is facilitated by the National Neisseria Network.
References
- 1.Harrison LH, Trotter CL, Ramsay ME. Global epidemiology of meningococcal disease. Vaccine. 2009;27 Suppl 2:B51–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rosenstein NE, Perkins BA, Stephens DS, Popovic T, Hughes JM. Meningococcal disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(18):1378–88. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105033441807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stephens DS, Greenwood B, Brandtzaeg P. Epidemic meningitis, meningococcaemia, and Neisseria meningitidis. Lancet. 2007;369(9580):2196–210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61016-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Peltola H. Meningococcal disease: still with us. Rev Infect Dis. 1983;5(1):71–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Delrieu I, Yaro S, Tamekloe TA, Njanpop-Lafourcade BM, Tall H, Jaillard P, et al. Emergence of epidemic Neisseria meningitidis serogroup X meningitis in Togo and Burkina Faso. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19513 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xie O, Pollard AJ, Mueller JE, Norheim G. Emergence of serogroup X meningococcal disease in Africa: need for a vaccine. Vaccine. 2013;31(27):2852–61. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Caugant DA, Maiden MC. Meningococcal carriage and disease—population biology and evolution. Vaccine. 2009;27 Suppl 2:B64–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shirley M, Dhillon S. Bivalent rLP2086 Vaccine (Trumenba®): A Review in Active Immunization Against Invasive Meningococcal Group B Disease in Individuals Aged 10–25 Years. BioDrugs. 2015;29(5):353–61. doi: 10.1007/s40259-015-0139-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ladhani SN, Giuliani MM, Biolchi A, Pizza M, Beebeejaun K, Lucidarme J, et al. Effectiveness of Meningococcal B Vaccine against Endemic Hypervirulent Neisseria meningitidis W Strain, England. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(2):309–11. doi: 10.3201/eid2202.150369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Serruto D, Bottomley MJ, Ram S, Giuliani MM, Rappuoli R. The new multicomponent vaccine against meningococcal serogroup B, 4CMenB: immunological, functional and structural characterization of the antigens. Vaccine. 2012;30 Suppl 2:B87–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Medini D, Stella M, Wassil J. MATS: Global coverage estimates for 4CMenB, a novel multicomponent meningococcal B vaccine. Vaccine. 2015;33(23):2629–36. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brehony C, Rodrigues CM, Borrow R, Smith A, Cunney R, Moxon ER, et al. Distribution of Bexsero® Antigen Sequence Types (BASTs) in invasive meningococcal disease isolates: Implications for immunisation. Vaccine. 2016;34(39):4690–7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.08.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mowlaboccus S, Perkins TT, Smith H, Sloots T, Tozer S, Prempeh LJ, et al. Temporal Changes in BEXSERO® Antigen Sequence Type Associated with Genetic Lineages of Neisseria meningitidis over a 15-Year Period in Western Australia. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0158315 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Inouye M, Dashnow H, Raven LA, Schultz MB, Pope BJ, Tomita T, et al. SRST2: Rapid genomic surveillance for public health and hospital microbiology labs. Genome Med. 2014;6(11):90 doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0090-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jolley KA, Maiden MC. BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC bioinformatics. 2010;11:595 doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kumar S, Stecher G, Peterson D, Tamura K. MEGA-CC: computing core of molecular evolutionary genetics analysis program for automated and iterative data analysis. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(20):2685–6. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bambini S, De Chiara M, Muzzi A, Mora M, Lucidarme J, Brehony C, et al. Neisseria adhesin A variation and revised nomenclature scheme. Clinical and vaccine immunology: CVI. 2014;21(7):966–71. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00825-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lahra MM, Enriquez RP, National Neisseria N. Australian Meningococcal Surveillance Programme annual report, 2015. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2016;40(4):E503–E11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hansman D. Meningococcal disease in South Australia: incidence and serogroup distribution 1971–1980. J Hyg (Lond). 1983;90(1):49–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Clements DA, Gilbert GL. Increase in admissions for Neisseria meningitidis infection in Australia. Lancet. 1989;2(8677):1464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hansman D, Ashton F. Serotype and serosubtype distribution of strains of Neisseria meningitidis isolated in South Australia and the Northern Territory of Australia: 1971–1989. Pathology. 1994;26(3):318–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Munro R, Kociuba K, Jelfs J, Brown J, Crone S, Chant K. Meningococcal disease in urban south western Sydney, 1990–1994. Aust N Z J Med. 1996;26(4):526–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Patel M. Meningococcal disease in Australia; looking at the past, thinking of the future. Commun Dis Intell. 1997;21(17):233–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jelfs J, Jalaludin B, Munro R, Patel M, Kerr M, Daley D, et al. A cluster of meningococcal disease in western Sydney, Australia initially associated with a nightclub. Epidemiol Infect. 1998;120(3):263–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Olesch CA, Knight GJ. Invasive meningococcal infection in Western Australia. J Paediatr Child Health. 1999;35(1):42–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jelfs J, Munro R. Epidemiology of meningococcal disease in Australia. J Paediatr Child Health. 2001;37(5):S3–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tribe DE, Zaia AM, Griffith JM, Robinson PM, Li HY, Taylor KN, et al. Increase in meningococcal disease associated with the emergence of a novel ST-11 variant of serogroup C Neisseria meningitidis in Victoria, Australia, 1999–2000. Epidemiol Infect. 2002;128(1):7–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pereira L, Harnett G, Chidlow G, Speers D. Prevalence of meningococcal genosubtypes (PorA types) in Western Australia from 2000 to 2006. Pathology. 2008;40(7):728–9. doi: 10.1080/00313020802436774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jardine A, Truman G, Sheppeard V, Gibbons D, Thomas J, Weston K. A community outbreak of meningococcal serogroup B disease in western Sydney: the challenges of identification and significance. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2009;33(2):221–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gunaratnam P, Massey P, Durrheim D, Torvaldsen S. Invasive meningococcal disease in elderly people, New South Wales, Australia, 1993 to 2012. Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2013;4(4):4–10. doi: 10.5365/WPSAR.2013.4.4.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Boan P, Metasan N, Tempone S, Harnett G, Speers DJ, Keil AD. Neisseria meningitidis porA, fetA and fHbp gene distribution in Western Australia 2000 to 2011. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:686 doi: 10.1186/s12879-014-0686-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gibson A, Jorm L, McIntyre P. Using linked birth, notification, hospital and mortality data to examine false-positive meningococcal disease reporting and adjust disease incidence estimates for children in New South Wales, Australia. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143(12):2570–9. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814003355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lawrence GL, Wang H, Lahra M, Booy R, Mc IP. Meningococcal disease epidemiology in Australia 10 years after implementation of a national conjugate meningococcal C immunization programme. Epidemiol Infect. 2016;144(11):2382–91. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816000704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Urwin R, Russell JE, Thompson EA, Holmes EC, Feavers IM, Maiden MC. Distribution of surface protein variants among hyperinvasive meningococci: implications for vaccine design. Infect Immun. 2004;72(10):5955–62. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.10.5955-5962.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Watkins ER, Maiden MC. Persistence of hyperinvasive meningococcal strain types during global spread as recorded in the PubMLST database. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45349 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bambini S, Piet J, Muzzi A, Keijzers W, Comandi S, De Tora L, et al. An analysis of the sequence variability of meningococcal fHbp, NadA and NHBA over a 50-year period in the Netherlands. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e65043 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Abad R, Medina V, Stella M, Boccadifuoco G, Comanducci M, Bambini S, et al. Predicted Strain Coverage of a New Meningococcal Multicomponent Vaccine (4CMenB) in Spain: Analysis of the Differences with Other European Countries. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0150721 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yazdankhah SP, Kriz P, Tzanakaki G, Kremastinou J, Kalmusova J, Musilek M, et al. Distribution of serogroups and genotypes among disease-associated and carried isolates of Neisseria meningitidis from the Czech Republic, Greece, and Norway. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(11):5146–53. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.5146-5153.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nissen M TS, Whiley D, Smith H, Rockett R. Use of the Meningococcal Antigen Typing System (MATS) to assess the Australian meningococcal strain coverage with a multicomponent serogroup B vaccine. In 18th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference (IPNC). 2012.
- 40.Mustapha MM, Marsh JW, Harrison LH. Global epidemiology of capsular group W meningococcal disease (1970–2015): Multifocal emergence and persistence of hypervirulent sequence type (ST)-11 clonal complex. Vaccine. 2016;34(13):1515–23. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ladhani SN, Beebeejaun K, Lucidarme J, Campbell H, Gray S, Kaczmarski E, et al. Increase in endemic Neisseria meningitidis capsular group W sequence type 11 complex associated with severe invasive disease in England and Wales. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(4):578–85. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bond KA, Stevens K, Bulach D, Carville K, Ong KS, Howden BP. Rising incidence of invasive meningococcal disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W in Victoria. Med J Aust. 2016;204(7):265–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Carville KS, Stevens K, Sohail A, Franklin LJ, Bond KA, Brahmi A, et al. Increase in Meningococcal Serogroup W Disease, Victoria, Australia, 2013–2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(10):1785–7. doi: 10.3201/eid2210.151935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Veitch MG, Owen RL. Rise in invasive serogroup W meningococcal disease in Australia 2013–2015. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2016;40(4):E451–E3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mowlaboccus S, Jolley KA, Bray JE, Pang S, Lee YT, Bew JD, et al. Clonal Expansion of New Penicillin-Resistant Clade of Neisseria meningitidis Serogroup W Clonal Complex 11, Australia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(8). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.