The ongoing outbreak of Ebola virus disease (EVD) in West Africa, the largest in history, has devastated the affected countries and raised public health concerns throughout the world. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in conjunction with the World Health Organization (WHO) has reported that as of July 8, 2015, there have been 16,913 total cases (suspected, probable and confirmed) in West Africa (of which 11,965 were laboratory confirmed) and 6,446 deaths.1 The CDC has estimated that there is potential underreporting by a factor of 2.5.2 For the first time ever, an Ebola outbreak has crossed international boundaries, initially moving among neighboring countries from Guinea to Liberia and Sierra Leone, and then spreading to non-contiguous countries including Nigeria, Senegal, Mali, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States.1 According to the WHO, as of July 5, 2015, a total of 875 confirmed healthcare personnel (HCP) infections had been reported from Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, with 509 deaths.3 As of March 12, 2015, 11 EVD-infected HCP had been transferred from West Africa to US hospitals.4 Secondary transmission from a patient with EVD to healthcare providers has also been reported in the United States and Spain.
EBOLA TRANSMISSION
Epidemiological studies have suggested that the Ebola virus spreads primarily through direct contact with a symptomatic person or their body fluids, especially in the latter stages of clinical disease.5,6 The elevated risk of transmission in the latter stages of EVD is likely due to a combination of increased viral titers in body fluids and increased body fluid discharges (ie, vomitus, stool, and blood). Post-mortem contact is also associated with a high risk of Ebola virus transmission.5 Concern has been raised regarding the possibility of aerosol transmission “either via large droplets or small particles in the vicinity of source patients.”7 Although animal studies suggest that droplet/airborne transmission may occur when the virus is experimentally aerosolized, epidemiologic studies of household contacts suggest that this rarely, if ever, occurs.5,6,8 However, there is concern that droplet or airborne transmission could occur in healthcare settings during aerosol-generating procedures such as intubation and induced sputum collection.
The fact that Ebola has been demonstrated to survive and remain infectious in liquid media at room temperature for at least 46 days raises concern about fomite transmission.9 Ebola inoculated onto glass carriers and maintained in the dark survived for hours to days (ie, 1-log10 decrease in 35.3 hours and 4-log10 decrease in 5.9 days).10 Some epidemiologic studies have suggested the possibility of transmission from contaminated environmental sources.6 Further, in the current outbreak, multiple environmental samples from an Ebola treatment unit were positive via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing.7 However, in a different study in which sampling was done following routine cleaning, all 31 environmental samples were negative by reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), suggesting that routine environmental cleaning and disinfection can decrease the potential for fomite transmission.11
PREVENTING EBOLA ACQUISITION BY HCP
As noted above, a substantial number of HCP in West Africa have acquired EVD. Nosocomial transmission of Ebola and infection of HCP has been repeatedly documented in past outbreaks.12–14 The cluster of Ebola cases in Dallas is illustrative of the 2 major risks for Ebola acquisition faced by US HCP.15,16 First, early recognition, triage, and isolation of all potential EVD cases are essential so adequate infection control measures can be applied and potential transmission of Ebola virus to HCP can be minimized. Second, the acquisition of EVD by 2 HCP who had substantial interaction with an Ebola patient while wearing protective equipment raised concern regarding the adequacy of protection afforded by personal protective equipment (PPE) or the training provided in its use.
The basis for preventing the spread of infectious agents in healthcare facilities is the implementation of transmission-based precautions, which includes different room placement (ie, private room or airborne isolation room) and HCP use of PPE (gloves, gowns, mask, N95 respirator, and/or face shield) based on the mechanism of transmission of the infectious agent (ie, contact, droplet, airborne).17 Given the acquisition of Ebola by HCP in Dallas and the large number of HCP in West Africa, 2 key questions have arisen. First, what is the evidence that PPE protects HCP from acquiring a contact transmitted disease? Second, what steps can we take to minimize the risk to HCP of acquiring EVD while caring for an infected patient?
The gloves and gowns of HCP frequently become contaminated with pathogens while providing care to patients on contact precautions. Recently, Williams et al18 reported that HCP frequently contaminated their clothing despite wearing gloves and gowns for patient care. Casanova et al19,20 assessed the ability of standard PPE (ie, gloves, gowns, respirator, and goggles) to protect against contamination of skin and clothes by dotting the outside of the PPE with bacteriophage MS2, a nonenveloped, nonpathogenic RNA virus. PPE was removed using the CDC-recommended doffing procedure. Initial experiments revealed that underlying clothing (scrub shirt, pants) and skin (dominant and nondominant hand) were contaminated >70% of the time.19 Further, the mean viral titer recovered was 1.8–2.4-log10 (inoculating dose = 104 on several PPE sites). Despite double gloving, skin contamination (6%–23%) and clothing contamination (56%–94%) remained common.20 The failure of standard PPE to protect HCP against skin and clothing contamination and the lack of validation of the level of protection afforded by PPE recommended for Ebola care have raised concerns.21
At the present time, it is recommended that HCP providing care to a patient with EVD use enhanced PPE.22 Although there is no consensus on each of the specific components of PPE among the major organizations providing care to EVD patients, all agree that it should uniformly protect the major portals of entry including mucous membranes and nonintact skin. CDC guidelines, which are directed toward the use of PPE in US hospitals, recommend double gloves, a single-use fluid-resistant gown or coverall, an impervious apron, and either a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) or an N95 respirator. If the latter is used, then it must be accompanied by a single-use surgical hood extending to the shoulders and a full face shield. Critical to maximizing PPE protection are detailed donning and doffing procedures, comprehensive training on proper donning and doffing, and use of a monitor to ensure proper donning and doffing.22
As demonstrated by Casanova et al, the major risk to the HCP is that during the doffing procedure contamination of underlying clothes or skin may occur. This raises the question of whether additional methods may be used to further protect the HCP such as decontamination of the PPE prior to removal by either ultraviolet light (UV) or use of a germicide (eg, hypochlorite). In this issue, Tomas et al23 report that a portable booth using UV-C radiation can be used to disinfect full-body PPE. They demonstrated that the delivered UV-C radiation resulted in ≥3-log10 reduction in MS2 virus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) within 3 minutes. Additionally, UV-C radiation has been demonstrated to inactivate the Ebola virus.24 Although the UV-C booth may reduce the risk of skin/clothing contamination during the doffing procedure, it may be impractical for use in lesser-developed countries. Another strategy to mitigate the risk of skin/clothing contamination during doffing would be to decontaminate the outside of the PPE using a germicide applied by spray or wipe such as hypochlorite (diluted bleach).25 However, although this procedure has often been used in the field, there is considerable debate about the use of sprays because of concern for aerosolizing laden body fluids that may contaminate the PPE.
To protect our HCP against acquisition of highly virulent pathogens such Ebola, we must assess all the potential risks for transmission (eg, inadequate detection of possible cases, inappropriate use of PPE) and implement strategies to minimize this risk (Table 1). The public health community needs to reduce the risks to our HCP by validating the currently recommended PPE, improving PPE as necessary, improve training of our HCP, and expand the number of facilities with healthcare units specifically designed to care for highly communicable diseases. We need to continue to develop innovative approaches such as that assessed by Dr. Tomas.
TABLE 1.
Protecting Healthcare Personnel from Acquisition of Ebola: Defining the Problems and Possible Solutions
| Issue | Possible Solutions |
|---|---|
| 1. Unrecognized EVD in a patient presenting to a clinic or emergency department |
|
| 2. Nonvalidated protection from PPE and current doffing method |
|
| 3. PPE shortages |
|
| 4. Proper training in PPE donning and doffing |
|
| 5. Maintain PPE proficiency |
|
| 6. General safety of Ebola care team |
|
| 7. Prevent HCP fatigue |
|
| 8. Define high- and low-risk zones in an Ebola care unit |
|
| 9. Environmental survival of Ebola virus |
|
| 10. Disinfectant susceptibility |
|
| 11. Management of PPE breaches |
|
NOTE. TSA, Transportation Security Administration; ED, emergency department; EVD, Ebola vial disease; HCP, healthcare personnel; PPE, personal protective equipment.
Finally, HCP at all US hospitals need to remember that more than 1 million travelers arrive in the United States each week.26 As demonstrated by the recent case of Lassa fever in New Jersey,27 the outbreak of MERS-CoV in Korea,28 and the Ebola cases resulting from travelers from West Africa,29 we are all only a plane ride away from potentially highly communicable and virulent infectious diseases.
Acknowledgments
Financial support. No financial support was provided relevant to this article.
Footnotes
Potential conflicts of interest. All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
References
- 1.Ebola (Ebola virus disease) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web site. http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014-west-africa/case-counts.html. Published 2015. Accessed July 13, 2015.
- 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimating the future number of cases in the Ebola epidemic—Liberia and Sierra Leone, 2014–2015. MMWR. 2014;63:1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.World Health Organization. Ebola situation report, July 8, 2015. World Health Organization; Web site. http://apps.who.int/ebola/current-situation/ebola-situation-report-8-july-2015. Published 2015. Accessed July 13, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Heavey S, Jenkins C, Kerry F. Ebola cases in the United States. Yahoo! News Web site. http://news.yahoo.com/ebola-cases-united-states-224845555.html.Published 2015. Accessed July 13, 2015.
- 5.Dowell SF, Mukunu R, Ksiazek TG, et al. Transmission of Ebola hemorrhagic fever: a study of risk factors in family members, Kikwit, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1995. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:S87–S91. doi: 10.1086/514284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Francesconi P, Yoti Z, Declich S, et al. Ebola hemorrhagic fever transmission and risk factors of contacts, Uganda. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;8:1430–1437. doi: 10.3201/eid0911.030339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Osterholm MT, Moore KA, Kelley NS, et al. Transmission of Ebola viruses: what we know and what we do not know. Mbio. 2015;6:e00137–e00145. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00137-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Johnson E, Jaax N, White J, Jahrling P. Lethal experimental infections of rhesus monkeys by aerosolized Ebola virus. Int J Exp Path. 1995;76:227–236. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Piercy TJ, Smither SJ, Steward JA, Eastaugh L, Lever MS. The survival of filoviruses in liquids, on solid substances and in a dynamic aerosol. J Appl Microbiol. 2010;109:1531–1539. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sanripanti J-L, Rom AM, Holland LE. Persistence in darkness of virulent alphaviruses, Ebola virus, and Lassa virus deposited on solid surfaces. Arch Virol. 2010;155:2035–2039. doi: 10.1007/s00705-010-0791-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bausch DG, Towner JS, Dowell SF, et al. Assessment of the risk of Ebola transmission from body fluids and fomites. J Infect Dis. 2007;196:S142–S147. doi: 10.1086/520545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kerstiens B, Matthys F. Interventions to control virus transmission during an outbreak of Ebola hemorrhagic fever: experience from Kikwit, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1995. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:S263–S267. doi: 10.1086/514320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tomori O, Bertolli J, Rollin PE, et al. Serologic survey among hospital and health center workers during the Ebola hemorrhagic fever outbreak in Kikwit, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1995. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:S98–S101. doi: 10.1086/514307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Khan AS, Tshioko FK, Heymann DL, et al. The reemergence of Ebola hemorrhagic fever, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1995. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:S76–S86. doi: 10.1086/514306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chevalier MS, Chung W, Smith J, et al. Ebola virus disease in the United States—Dallas County, Texas, 2014. MMWR. 2014;63:1087–1088. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chung WM, Smith J, Weil LM, et al. Active tracing and monitoring of contacts associated with the first cluster of Ebola in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:164–173. doi: 10.7326/M15-0968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L, the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee . Guideline for isolation precautions: preventing transmission of infectious agents in healthcare settings. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2007. Web site. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/isolation2007.pdf. Accessed July 13, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Williams C, McGraw P, Schneck EE, et al. Impact of universal gowning and gloving on health care worker clothing contamination. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36:431–437. doi: 10.1017/ice.2014.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Casanova L, Alfano-Sobsey E, Rutala WA, Weber DJ, Sobsey M. Virus transfer from personal protective equipment to healthcare employees’ skin and clothing. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1291–1293. doi: 10.3201/eid1408.080085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Casanova LM, Rutala WA, Weber DJ, Sobsey MD. Effect of single- versus double-gloving on virus transfer to health care workers’ skin and clothing during removal of personal protective equipment. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40:369–374. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sprecher AG, Caluwaerts A, Draper M, et al. Personal protective equipment for filovirus epidemics: a call for better evidence. J Infect Dis. 2015 doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fischer WA, Weber DJ, Wohl DA. Personal protective equipment is one part of an effective prevention and control strategy in an infectious disease outbreak. Clin Therapeutics. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.07.007. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tomas ME, Cadnum JL, Jencson A, Donskey CJ. The Ebola disinfection booth: evaluation of an enclosed ultraviolet light booth for disinfection of contaminated personal protective equipment prior to removal. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36:1226–1228. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sagripanti J-L, Lytle CD. Sensitivity to ultraviolet radiation of Lassa, vaccinia, and Ebola viruses dried on surfaces. Arch Virol. 2011;156:489–494. doi: 10.1007/s00705-010-0847-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Uses of inorganic hypochlorite (bleach) in health-care facilities. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:597–610. doi: 10.1128/cmr.10.4.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.US Department of Commerce. International visitation to the United States: a statistical summary of US visitation. http://www.tinet.ita.doc/gov/research/monthl/.arrivals/index.html. Published 2012. Accessed July 13, 2015.
- 27.Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)— Republic of Korea. World Health Organization; Web site. http://www.who.int/csr/don/23-june-2015-mers-korea/en/#. Published 2015. Accessed July 13, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lassa fever—United States of America. World Health Organization; Web site. http://www.who.int/csr/don/28-may-2015-lassa-fever-usa/en/. Published 2015. Accessed July 13, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bogoch II, Creatore ML, Cetron MS, et al. Assessment of the potential for international dissemination of Ebola virus via commercial air travel during the 2014 West African outbreak. Lancet. 2015;385:29–35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61828-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
