Abstract
Lens opacities or cataract(s) represent a universally important cause of visual impairment and blindness. Typically, cataract is acquired with aging as a complex disorder involving environmental and genetic risk factors. Cataract may also be inherited with an early onset either in association with other ocular and/or systemic abnormalities or as an isolated lens phenotype. Here we briefly review recent advances in gene discovery for inherited and age-related forms of cataract that are providing new insights into lens development and aging.
1. INTRODUCTION
The crystalline lens plays a central role in vertebrate eye development and refractive vision.1 Loss of lens transparency, or cataract, is a frequently acquired cause of visual impairment in those over 40 years of age.2 Despite advances in surgical treatment, age-related cataract remains a clinically important cause of visual impairment in economically developed countries (www.preventblindness.org) and of blindness (51%) worldwide.3 Clinical examination of age-related cataract by slit-lamp imaging reveals three classical types of opacities, namely, nuclear cataract, cortical cataract, and posterior subcapsular cataract. Each can occur in isolation or in combination (mixed cataract) and may progress to total opacification of the lens. Several grading systems have been devised that measure cataract severity and progression rate (e.g., Lens Opacities Classification System III).4 Epidemiological studies have established that age-related cataract is a multifactorial disorder involving complex interactions between environmental risk factors (e.g., UV exposure, tobacco smoking) and genetic susceptibility loci.5 Heritability estimates for age-related cataract range from 35% to 48% for nuclear opacities and 24% to 58% for cortical opacities.6 However, the identities of the underlying genetic factors remain poorly characterized.
In addition to being acquired with aging, cataract may present in one or both eyes with an early onset starting at birth (congenital), during infancy, during childhood, or adolescence, and represents a significant cause of visual disability in the pediatric age-group worldwide.7 Under slit-lamp examination, pediatric cataract exhibits considerable phenotypic variability with respect to location, size, shape, density, age at onset, rate of progression, and even color of opacities within the lens. There is no universally accepted classification system for pediatric cataract. However, several main types of pediatric opacities can be distinguished based on their lens location including nuclear, lamellar, sutural, polar or subcapsular, and total.8 Congenital and infantile forms of cataract, especially when unilateral, represent a clinically important cause of impaired visual development as a result of deprivation amblyopia. Surgical treatment of pediatric cataract poses a long-term risk of postoperative complications including secondary glaucoma, nystagmus, and retinal detachment.9–11 Etiological studies of pediatric cataract have estimated that genetic causes account for 10–39% of pediatric cataract/cases. However, this may be an underestimate since approximately 50–60% of cases are deemed idiopathic.12–14
Mendelian inheritance of cataract has been documented since the late 1800s and in the 1960s an inherited form of cataract (CAE1) that was closely linked with the Duffy blood-group locus (Fy) became the first monogenic disease assigned to an autosome (chromosome 1) in humans.15 Since then, considerable progress has been made in mapping, identifying, and characterizing genes underlying inherited forms of cataract mostly as a result of linkage analysis in extended families.16–19 Currently, if the keyword “cataract(s)” is used to search the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database (www.omim.org), over 600 entries are retrieved revealing a wide spectrum of cataract phenotypes along with many animal—particularly mouse—models. In addition to featuring as a secondary or variably associated symptom of many genetic syndromes and/or metabolic disorders,20 inherited cataract can present as an isolated or primary lens phenotype— the latter accompanied by relatively mild ocular signs including microcornea, refractive error (e.g., myopia), and/or eye movement disorders (nystagmus, strabismus, amblyopia).16–19
Typically, inherited cataract presents bilaterally with an early onset (birth—40 years), and most cases are diagnosed as congenital, infantile, or juvenile and display considerable inter- and intrafamilial variation in clinical appearance. All three classical modes of Mendelian inheritance are represented; however, most families segregating isolated or primary cataract with few other ocular signs exhibit autosomal dominant transmission with high penetrance. In this chapter, we review recent advances in gene discovery for Mendelian forms of isolated or primary cataract and highlight the implications of these findings for identifying genetic determinants of the much more common forms of age-related cataract.
2. GENES UNDERLYING ISOLATED OR PRIMARY INHERITED CATARACT
According to OMIM, at least 42 loci have been identified for inherited forms of isolated or primary cataract (Table 1) with minimal other ocular signs (e.g., microcornea). Currently, 12 of these are “orphan” loci with no identified genes. For convenience, the 30 known genes may be arbitrarily divided into four groups based on subcellular localization and/or protein function, namely, cytoplasmic crystallins, membrane proteins, cytoskeletal proteins, and DNA/RNA-binding proteins.
Table 1.
Loci and Genes for Cataract (CTRCT)
Cataract Phenotype | Locus | Inheritance | Associated Phenotypes | Gene | Phenotype MIM No. |
Gene/Locus MIM No. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTRCT1; multiple types | 1q21.1 | AD/AR | ± Microcornea | GJA8 | 116200 | 600897 |
CTRCT2; multiple types | 2q33.3 | AD | ± Microcornea | CRYGC | 604307 | 123680 |
CTRCT3; multiple types | 22q11.23 | AD | ± Microcornea | CRYBB2 | 601547 | 123620 |
CTRCT4; multiple types | 2q33.3 | AD | ± Microcornea | CRYGD | 115700 | 123690 |
CTRCT5; multiple types | 16q21 | AD/AR | HSF4 | 116800 | 602438 | |
CTRCT6; multiple types | 1p36.13 | AD/AR | Age-related cortical | EPHA2 | 116600 | 176946 |
CTRCT7 | 17q24 | AD | ? | 115660 | ? | |
CTRCT8; multiple types | 1pter-p36.13 | AD | ? | 115665 | ? | |
CTRCT9; multiple types | 21q22.3 | AD/AR | ± Microcornea | CRYAA | 123580 | |
CTRCT10; multiple types | 17q11.2 | AD | CRYBA1 | 600881 | 123610 | |
CTRCT11; multiple types | 10q24.32 | AD | Anterior segment mesenchymal dysgenesis, microphthalmia, neurodevelopmental abnormalities | PITX3 | 610623 | 602669 |
CTRCT12; multiple types | 3q22.1 | AD | Myopia? | BFSP2 | 611597 | 603212 |
CTRCT13 | 6p24 | AR | Adult i (blood group) phenotype | GCNT2 | 110800 | 600429 |
CTRCT14; multiple types | 13q12.1 | AD | GJA3 | 601885 | 121015 | |
CTRCT15; multiple types | 12q13.3 | AD | MIP | 615274 | 154050 | |
CTRCT16; multiple types | 11q22.3 | AD/AR | Myopathy, cardiomyopathy | CRYAB | 613763 | 123590 |
CTRCT17; multiple types | 22q12.1 | AD/AR | CRYBB1 | 611544 | 6009291 | |
CTRCT18 | 3p21.31 | AR | FYCO1 | 610019 | 607182 | |
CTRCT19 | 19q13.41 | AR | LIM2 | 615277 | 154045 | |
CTRCT20; multiple types | 3q27.3 | AD | CRYGS | 116100 | 123730 | |
CTRCT21; multiple types | 16q22-q23 | AD | ± Microcornea | MAF | 610202 | 177075 |
CTRCT22; multiple types | 22q11.23 | AD/AR | CRYBB3 | 609741 | 123630 | |
CTRCT23 | 22q12.1 | AD | CRYBA4 | 610425 | 123631 | |
CTRCT24; anterior polar | 17p13 | AD | ? | 601202 | ? | |
CTRCT25 | 15q21-q22 | AD | ? | 605728 | ? | |
CTRCT26; multiple types | 9q13-q22 | AR | ? | 605749 | ? | |
CTRCT27; nuclear progressive | 2p12 | AD | ? | 607304 | ? | |
CTRCT28 | 6p12-q12 | Complex | Age-related cortical, susceptibility to | ? | 609026 | ? |
CTRCT29; coralliform | 2pter-p24 | AD | ? | 115800 | ? | |
CTRCT30; pulverulent | 10p13 | AD | VIM | 116300 | 193060 | |
CTRCT31; multiple types | 20q11.21 | AD | CHMP4B | 605387 | 610897 | |
CTRCT32; multiple types | 14q22-q23 | AD | ? | %115650 | ? | |
CTRCT33; cortical | 20p12.1 | AR | BFSP1 | 611391 | 603307 | |
CTRCT34; multiple types | 1p34.3-p32.2 | AR | ± Microcornea | ? | 612968 | ? |
CTRCT35; congenital nuclear | 19q13 | AR | ? | 609376 | ? | |
CTRCT36 | 9q22.33 | AR | TDRD7 | 613887 | 611258 | |
CTRCT37; cerulean | 12q24.2-q24.3 | AD | ? | 614422 | ? | |
CTRCT38 | 7q34 | AR | Sengers syndrome | AGK | 614691 | 610345 |
CTRCT39; multiple types | 2q34 | AD | CRYGB | 615188 | 123670 | |
CTRCT40 | Xp22.13 | X-linked | Nance–Horan (cataract-dental) syndrome | NHS | 302200 | 300457 |
CTRCT41 | 4p16.1 | AD | Wolfram syndrome (DIDMOAD) | WFS1 | 116400 | 606201 |
CTRCT42 | 2q34 | AD | CRYBA2 | 115900 | 600836 |
2.1 Genes Encoding Crystallins
Crystallin (CRY) genes encode >90% of the lens cytoplasmic proteins and these highly abundant, long-lived, soluble proteins play a key role in establishing the gradient refractive index of the lens.21 Around 100 different mutations in 12 crystallin genes segregating in over 100 families have been identified that account for about 40–50% of all autosomal dominant cataract reported so far. CRYAA and CRYAB encode the α-crystallins, two members of the small heat-shock protein (sHSP) family, that form large multimeric complexes (Mr ~500 kDa) with chaperone-like properties.22 Mutations in CRYAA are variably associated with nuclear-type opacities and microcornea. By contrast, mutations in CRYAB are also associated with several myopathies consistent with its abundant expression in muscle where its binds and stabilizes desmin. Mutations in the genes for β-crystallins (CRYBB1, BB2, BB3, BA1, BA2, and BA4) and γ-crystallins (CRYGB, GC, GD, and GS) tend to disrupt folding of the structurally conserved Greek-key domains and/or alter the protein’s surface properties resulting in reduced solubility and increased precipitation.23
2.2 Genes Encoding Membrane Proteins
An increasing number of transmembrane and membrane-associated proteins that mostly facilitate diverse transport, junctional, or kinase functions have been associated with inherited forms of cataract.16–19 GJA3 and GJA8 encode the gap-junction proteins connexin-46 and connexin-50, respectively, that oligomerize to form hexameric gap-junction channels involved in lens intercellular communication (e.g., ions, electrolytes). Mutations in GJA3 and GJA8 are typically associated with nuclear and zonular-pulverulent opacities and account for about 20% of families with autosomal dominant cataract. Functional expression studies reveal that mutant connexins exhibit failed targeting to the cell surface and/or altered channel properties that compromise intercellular communication.24 MIP encodes the aquaporin-0 water channel that, in addition to water transport, plays an important cell–cell adhesion role critical for lens integrity and transparency. Mutations in MIP underlie autosomal dominant cataract with variable morphologies and most are believed to cause abnormal retention of the mutant protein within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER).25,26 LIM2 encodes a member (MP20) of the peripheral myelin protein-22 (PMP22)_claudin family of transmembrane proteins that share functions in cell adhesion and junction formation, and is required for formation of the lens core syncytium. Despite its relative abundance and likely structural role in the lens, mutations in LIM2 have so far been found to underlie autosomal recessive cataract suggesting loss-of-function effects.27,28
EPHA2 encodes a member of the ephrin receptor subfamily of protein-tyrosine kinases and through its interaction with src kinase has been implicated in lens cell migration. Mutations in EPHA2 have been associated with autosomal dominant and recessive forms of cataract consistent with deleterious gain-of-function and loss-of-function mechanisms, respectively. Mutations clustered in the cytoplasmic sterile-alpha-motif domain underlying autosomal dominant cataract have been shown to destabilize the receptor and impair Akt-activated cell migration in vitro.29–31 AGK encodes the mitochondrial membrane protein acylglycerol kinase a key enzyme in membrane-lipid metabolism, and a truncation mutation has been associated with autosomal recessive cataract in a Saudi family. Similar mutations in AGK have also been associated with “syndromic” cataract including Sengers syndrome and infantile mitochondrial disease.32 CHMP4B encodes charged multivesicular body protein 4B (CHMP4B)—a core component of the endosome sorting complex required for transport-III. CHMP4B mutations are associated with posterior-polar cataract consistent with a role for endosome–lysosome pathway in lens homeostasis.33 WFS1 encodes the transmembrane protein, wolframin, that is located primarily in the ER, and is believed to play an important role in regulating ER stress and calcium homeostasis. Typically, homozygous mutations in WFS1 underlie autosomal recessive Wolfram syndrome 1, which is characterized by diabetes insipidus, diabetes mellitus, optic atrophy, and deafness (DIDMOAD). However, a heterozygous missense mutation in WFS1 has been associated with autosomal dominant congenital nuclear cataract without ocular or systemic abnormalities in an Irish family.34
2.3 Genes Encoding Cytoskeletal Proteins
Genes encoding key components of the lens cytoskeleton or proteins with functional ties to the cytoskeleton have been found to underlie inherited cataract. BFSP1 (CP115 or filensin) and BFSP2 (CP49 or phakanin) encode intermediate filament-like proteins that combine with α-crystallin to form beaded-filament structures found only in lens fiber cells.35 Both autosomal dominant and recessive cataracts have been associated with mutations in BFSP1 and BFSP2. The dominant opacities tend to appear as nuclear or lamellar with sutural involvement, whereas the recessive opacities tend to be cortical. A single mutation in the gene coding for the ubiquitous intermediate filament, vimentin (VIM) has also been linked with autosomal dominant pulverulent cataract.36 FYCO1 encodes a scaffolding protein that is active in microtubule transport of autophagic vesicles. Multiple FYCO1 mutations underlie autosomal recessive cataract consistent with an important role for autophagy in lens transparency.37 NHS encodes a regulator of actin remodeling and cell shape. Copy number variations (CNVs) in NHS cause X-linked cataract (CXN). However, nonsense and frameshift mutations in NHS cause Nance–Horan (cataract-dental) syndrome in males and mild sutural opacities in female carriers.38,39
2.4 Genes Encoding DNA- or RNA-Binding Proteins
Mutations in several transcription factor genes involved in eye development can present primarily as a cataract phenotype. HSF4 regulates transcription of sHSPs including lens CRYAB.40 Mutations in HSF4 that underlie autosomal dominant cataract lie within the alpha-helical DNA-binding domain, whereas HSF4 mutations underlying autosomal recessive cataract lie outside this functionally conserved domain. Three HSF4 truncation mutations linked with recessive cataract have been shown to result in the loss of regulatory domains at the C-terminal end of the protein consistent with loss-of-function mechanisms.41 PITX3 encodes a paired-like homeodomain transcription factor that plays a key role in the regulation of genes involved in lens development including MIP/AQP0.42 Mutations in PITX3 underlie both dominant and recessive forms of cataract with or without anterior segment dysgenesis and microphthalmia. All known coding mutations are located outside the functionally conserved DNA-binding homeodomain. However, several frameshift mutations, including a recurrent 17 bp duplication, have been shown to disrupt the C-terminal otp/aristaless/rax (OAR) domain resulting in an altered DNA-binding profile and reduced transactivation activity.43 MAF encodes a bZIP transcription factor that binds to MAF-responsive elements located in the promoter regions of target genes, including those for crystallins and MIP, with varying transactivation properties. MAF mutations, located within the conserved DNA-binding domain, underlie autosomal dominant cataract with or without microcornea and disease severity has been correlated with differential transactivation effects on several of the beta/gamma crystallin genes.44
Beyond DNA-binding transcription factors, mutations in the gene coding for an RNA-binding protein, tudor domain containing-7 (TDRD7), have been associated with autosomal recessive cataract.45 TDRD7 localizes to a distinct subset of cytoplasmic RNA granules that interact with processing (P) bodies and Staufen-1 (STAU-1) ribonucleoproteins. These findings point to an important role for posttranscriptional regulation of mRNA processing and subcellular localization in lens homeostasis.
3. GENES ASSOCIATED WITH AGE-RELATED CATARACT
Case–control association studies have sought to find genetic susceptibility factors for age-related cataract. Several such studies using a candidate gene approach have found coding and noncoding variations in some of the same genes underlying inherited cataract that are also associated with age-related cataract. These genes include EPHA2 (1p), GJA3 (13q), GJA8 (1q), MIP (12q), HSF4 (16q), LIM2 (19q), and CRYAA (21q).46–50 However, only the EPHA2 association has been replicated in different populations including with cortical cataract in Caucasians and Han Chinese, with cortical cataract and PSC in Indians, and with any cataract in Caucasians and Asians from China and India.46,51–54 There was no association of EPHA2 variants with nuclear cataract in any population.
Candidate genes underlying syndromic or systemic forms of cataract have also been associated with age-related cataract. GALK1 (17q) encodes the first enzyme in galactose metabolism and causative mutations in this gene underlie autosomal recessive galactokinase 1-deficiency with cataract—the latter as a result of galactitol accumulation and subsequent osmotic stress. The “Osaka” coding variation in GALK1 (p.A198V) results in enzyme instability and has been associated with increased risk of age-related cataract in the Japanese population.55 SLC16A12 (10q) encodes a creatine transporter and mutations in this gene underlie autosomal dominant juvenile cataract plus microcornea and renal glucosuria.56 Variations in the 5′-untranslated region of SLC16A12 have been associated with age-related cataract in Caucasians.57 Mutations in WRN(8p), which encodes a genomic DNA helicase, cause autosomal recessive Werner syndrome—a premature aging (progeroid) disorder with early-onset cataract. Both CNVs and single nucleotide variants in WRN have been associated with age-related cortical cataract in Han Chinese.58–60
In addition to genes involved in hereditary cataract, variations in other candidate genes not directly associated with inherited forms of cataract have been tentatively implicated in age-related cataract. These include genes that function in antioxidant metabolism (GSTM1, GSTT1), lactose metabolism (LCT), drug metabolism (NAT2), folate metabolism (MTHFR), DNA repair (XPD), lipid/cholesterol transport (APOE), kinesin/microtubule motor transport (KLC1), actin-cytoskeleton regulation (EZR), chaperone activity (HSP70), and ephrin signaling (EFNA5).61–70
A limitation of candidate gene case–control studies is that they may be statistically underpowered to find genome-wide association and are often not replicated in different populations. A previous genome-wide linkage scan has reported several statistically significant susceptibility loci for age-related cortical cataract in Caucasians, including a locus on chromosome 6p12-q12 (CTRCT28); however, no specific genes were identified.71 So far, only one of the above genes underlying inherited cataract has met genome-wide statistical significance for association with age-related cataract. A recent meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in multiethnic Asians has identified variants near the 3′-end of CRYAA (21q) strongly associated with age-related nuclear cataract.72 This study also identified intronic variations in KCNAB1 (3q), which encodes a member of the potassium voltage-gated channel, shaker-related subfamily, that were significantly associated with age-related nuclear cataract along with 14 other loci showing suggestive association. Mutations in two of the latter genes, SLC4A4 (4q) and COL4A1 (13q), underlie syndromic forms of congenital cataract associated with renal disease. Finally, another GWAS based on electronic medical records linked to DNA biobanks from individuals of mostly European descent identified a novel range of potential susceptibility loci for age-related cataract including those harboring aldolase B (ALDOB), mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 1 (MAP3K1), and monocyte-specific enhancer factor 2C (MEF2C).73 However, none of these susceptibility loci met genome-wide significance.
4. SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK
In addition to the plethora of genetic syndromes and metabolic disorders that are variably associated with cataract, at least 42 genes and loci have been found to underlie inherited forms of isolated or primary cataract. A review of the known causative genes suggests that they may be arbitrarily divided into two broad groups. The first group recapitulates important structure–function aspects of lens biology involving α- and β/γ-crystallins (e.g., CRYAA, CRYBB2, CRYGD), α-connexins (GJA3, GJA8), and other lens abundant membrane or cytoskeleton proteins (e.g., MIP/AQP0, BFSP2). The second group highlights developmental and/or regulatory processes or pathways in the lens involving several transcription factors (e.g., HSF4, PITX3) and an expanding cohort of functionally diverse genes (e.g., EPHA2, TDRD7, FYCO1).
Despite the increasing genetic heterogeneity of inherited cataract, gene discovery studies remain both scientifically and clinically important for several reasons. First, they provide a rational, “gene-centric” basis for clinical classification and molecular diagnosis of Mendelian forms of cataract. While morphological descriptions of lens opacities may assist in the diagnosis of certain genetic syndromes (e.g., sutural opacities in female NHS carriers), in most cases phenotype–genotype correlations are challenging as morphologically similar opacities may be caused by different genes and vice versa. Genetic studies employing next-generation (massively parallel) exome sequencing now facilitate concurrent profiling of the known candidate genes for underlying mutations and may also enable the identification of novel genes for cataract. As exome sequencing becomes more cost effective, such studies of inherited cataract will provide personalized diagnosis and enhanced genetic counseling for affected families and sporadic cases. Second, they identify plausible candidate genes for genome-wide association (or linkage) studies seeking to discover genetic determinants of age-related cataract. Currently, there is increasing evidence that several genes underlying rare forms of inherited cataract can also influence susceptibility to the much more prevalent forms of age-related cataract (e.g., EPHA2, CRYAA). These observations raise the possibility of molecular genetic links between lens development and aging. Finally, they provide new insights into lens biology. Notably, the recent discovery of mutations in genes coding for EPHA2, TDRD7, and FYCO1 has provided the first evidence for the functional importance of ephrin signaling, posttranscriptional mRNA regulation, and the autophagy pathway, respectively, in human lens transparency. In the longer term, such discoveries may translate into novel therapeutic strategies that can delay or even prevent cataract onset.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH/NEI grants EY012284 (to A.S.) and EY02687 (Core Grant for Vision Research), and by an unrestricted grant to the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences from Research to Prevent Blindness.
References
- 1.Wormstone IM, Wride MA. The ocular lens: a classic model for development, physiology and disease. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366:1190–1192. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Asbell PA, Dualan I, Mindel J, Brocks D, Ahmad M, Epstein S. Age-related cataract. Lancet. 2005;365:599–609. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17911-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:614–618. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chylack LT, Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The lens opacities classification system III. The longitudinal study of cataract study group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:831–836. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090060119035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McCarty CA, Taylor HR. The genetics of cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(8):1677–1678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sanfilippo PG, Hewitt AW, Hammond CJ, Mackey DA. The heritability of ocular traits. Surv Ophthalmol. 2010;55:561–583. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Medsinge A, Nischal KK. Pediatric cataract: challenges and future directions. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:77–90. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S59009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Amaya L, Taylor D, Russell-Eggitt I, Nischal KK, Lengyel D. The morphology and natural history of childhood cataracts. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48:125–144. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00462-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lambert SR, Purohit A, Superak HM, Lynn MJ, Beck AD. Long-term risk of glaucoma after congenital cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:355–361. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Young MP, Heidary G, VanderVeen DK. Relationship between the timing of cataract surgery and development of nystagmus in patients with bilateral infantile cataracts. J AAPOS. 2012;16:554–557. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Haargaard B, Andersen EW, Oudin A, et al. Risk of retinal detachment after pediatric cataract surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:2947–2951. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-13996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rahi JS, Dezateux C. Congenital and infantile cataract in the United Kingdom: underlying or associated factors. British congenital cataract interest group. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2108–2114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Haargaard B, Wohlfahrt J, Fledelius HC, Rosenberg T, Melbye M. A nationwide Danish study of 1027 cases of congenital/infantile cataracts: etiological and clinical classifications. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2292–2298. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lim Z, Rubab S, Chan YH, Levin AV. Pediatric cataract: the Toronto experience-etiology. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:887–892. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hejtmancik JF. The genetics of cataract: our vision becomes clearer. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:520–525. doi: 10.1086/301774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shiels A, Hejtmancik JF. Genetic origins of cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:165–173. doi: 10.1001/archopht.125.2.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hejtmancik JF. Congenital cataracts and their molecular genetics. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2008;19:134–149. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shiels A, Bennett TM, Hejtmancik JF. Cat-Map: putting cataract on the map. Mol Vis. 2010;16:2007–2015. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shiels A, Hejtmancik JF. Genetics of human cataract. Clin Genet. 2013;84:120–127. doi: 10.1111/cge.12182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Trumler AA. Evaluation of pediatric cataracts and systemic disorders. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011;22:365–379. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834994dc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pierscionek BK, Regini JW. The gradient index lens of the eye: an opto-biological synchrony. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012;31:332–349. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Clark AR, Lubsen NH, Slingsby C. sHSP in the eye lens: crystallin mutations, cataract and proteostasis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012;44:1687–1697. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wistow G. The human crystallin gene families. Hum Genomics. 2012;6:26. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-6-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Beyer EC, Ebihara L, Berthoud VM. Connexin mutants and cataracts. Front Pharmacol. 2013;4:43. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shiels A. Focus on molecules: major intrinsic protein. Exp Eye Res. 2012;101:107–108. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2010.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lo WK, Biswas SK, Brako L, Shiels A, Gu S, Jiang JX. Aquaporin-0 targets interlocking domains to control the integrity and transparency of the eye lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:1202–1212. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shi Y, Barton K, De Maria A, Petrash JM, Shiels A, Bassnett S. The stratified syncytium of the vertebrate lens. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:1607–1615. doi: 10.1242/jcs.045203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Maher GJ, Black GC, Manson FD. Focus on molecules: lens intrinsic membrane protein (LIM2/MP20) Exp Eye Res. 2012;103:115–116. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2011.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Park JE, Son AI, Hua R, Wang L, Zhang X, Zhou R. Human cataract mutations in EPHA2 SAM domain alter receptor stability and function. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shi Y, De Maria A, Bennett T, Shiels A, Bassnett S. A role for epha2 in cell migration and refractive organization of the ocular lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:551–559. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cheng C, Ansari MM, Cooper JA, Gong X. EphA2 and Src regulate equatorial cell morphogenesis during lens development. Development. 2013;140:4237–4245. doi: 10.1242/dev.100727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Aldahmesh MA, Khan AO, Mohamed JY, Alghamdi MH, Alkuraya FS. Identification of a truncation mutation of acylglycerol kinase (AGK) gene in a novel autosomal recessive cataract locus. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:960–962. doi: 10.1002/humu.22071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shiels A, Bennett TM, Knopf HL, et al. CHMP4B, a novel gene for autosomal dominant cataracts linked to chromosome 20q. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:596–606. doi: 10.1086/519980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Berry V, Gregory-Evans C, Emmett W, et al. Wolfram gene (WFS1) mutation causes autosomal dominant congenital nuclear cataract in humans. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21:1356–1360. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Song S, Landsbury A, Dahm R, Liu Y, Zhang Q, Quinlan RA. Functions of the intermediate filament cytoskeleton in the eye lens. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:1837–1848. doi: 10.1172/JCI38277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Muller M, Bhattacharya SS, Moore T, et al. Dominant cataract formation in association with a vimentin assembly disrupting mutation. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:1052–1057. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chen J, Ma Z, Jiao X, et al. Mutations in FYCO1 cause autosomal-recessive congenital cataracts. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88:827–838. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Brooks SP, Coccia M, Tang HR, et al. The Nance-Horan syndrome protein encodes a functional WAVE homology domain (WHD) and is important for co-ordinating actin remodelling and maintaining cell morphology. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:2421–2432. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Coccia M, Brooks SP, Webb TR, et al. X-linked cataract and Nance-Horan syndrome are allelic disorders. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:2643–2655. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Somasundaram T, Bhat SP. Developmentally dictated expression of heat shock factors: exclusive expression of HSF4 in the postnatal lens and its specific interaction with alphaB-crystallin heat shock promoter. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:44497–44503. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405813200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Merath K, Ronchetti A, Sidjanin DJ. Functional analysis of HSF4 mutations found in patients with autosomal recessive congenital cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:6646–6654. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sorokina EA, Muheisen S, Mlodik N, Semina EV. MIP/aquaporin 0 represents a direct transcriptional target of PITX3 in the developing lens. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Verdin H, Sorokina EA, Meire F, et al. Novel and recurrent PITX3 mutations in Belgian families with autosomal dominant congenital cataract and anterior segment dysgenesis have similar phenotypic and functional characteristics. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014;9:26. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-9-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Vanita V, Guo G, Singh D, Ott CE, Robinson PN. Differential effect of cataract-associated mutations in MAF on transactivation of MAF target genes. Mol Cell Biochem. 2014;396:137–145. doi: 10.1007/s11010-014-2150-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lachke SA, Alkuraya FS, Kneeland SC, et al. Mutations in the RNA granule component TDRD7 cause cataract and glaucoma. Science. 2011;331:1571–1576. doi: 10.1126/science.1195970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shiels A, Bennett TM, Knopf HL, et al. The EPHA2 gene is associated with cataracts linked to chromosome 1p. Mol Vis. 2008;14:2042–2055. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shi Y, Shi X, Jin Y, et al. Mutation screening of HSF4 in 150 age-related cataract patients. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1850–1855. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhou Z, Wang B, Hu S, Zhang C, Ma X, Qi Y. Genetic variations in GJA3, GJA8, LIM2, and age-related cataract in the Chinese population: a mutation screening study. Mol Vis. 2011;17:621–626. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhou Z, Wang B, Luo Y, et al. Major intrinsic protein (MIP) polymorphism is associated with age-related cataract in Chinese. Mol Vis. 2011;17:2292–2296. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Validandi V, Reddy VS, Srinivas PN, et al. Temperature-dependent structural and functional properties of a mutant (F71L) alphaA-crystallin: molecular basis for early onset of age-related cataract. FEBS Lett. 2011;585:3884–3889. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.10.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jun G, Guo H, Klein BE, et al. EPHA2 is associated with age-related cortical cataract in mice and humans. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tan W, Hou S, Jiang Z, Hu Z, Yang P, Ye J. Association of EPHA2 polymorphisms and age-related cortical cataract in a Han Chinese population. Mol Vis. 2011;17:1553–1558. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sundaresan P, Ravindran RD, Vashist P, et al. EPHA2 polymorphisms and age-related cataract in India. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yang J, Luo J, Zhou P, Fan Q, Luo Y, Lu Y. Association of the ephreceptor tyrosinekinase-type A2 (EPHA2) gene polymorphism rs3754334 with age-related cataract risk: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e71003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Okano Y, Asada M, Fujimoto A, et al. A genetic factor for age-related cataract: identification and characterization of a novel galactokinase variant, “Osaka,” in Asians. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68:1036–1042. doi: 10.1086/319512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Abplanalp J, Laczko E, Philp NJ, et al. The cataract and glucosuria associated monocarboxylate transporter MCT12 is a new creatine transporter. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22:3218–3226. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zuercher J, Neidhardt J, Magyar I, et al. Alterations of the 5’untranslated region of SLC16A12 lead to age-related cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:3354–3361. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Su S, Yao Y, Zhu R, et al. The associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms of DNA repair genes, DNA damage, and age-related cataract: Jiangsu Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:1201–1207. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jiang J, Zhou J, Yao Y, et al. Copy number variations of DNA repair genes and the age-related cataract: Jiangsu Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:932–938. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jiang S, Hu N, Zhou J, et al. Polymorphisms of the WRN gene and DNA damage of peripheral lymphocytes in age-related cataract in a Han Chinese population. Age. 2013;35:2435–2444. doi: 10.1007/s11357-013-9512-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sun L, Xi B, Yu L, et al. Association of glutathione S-transferases polymorphisms (GSTM1 and GSTT1) with senile cataract: a meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6381–6386. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Karas-Kuzelicki N, Pfeifer V, Lukac-Bajalo J. Synergistic effect of high lactase activity genotype and galactose-1-phosphate uridyl transferase (GALT) mutations on idiopathic presenile cataract formation. Clin Biochem. 2008;41:869–874. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Tamer L, Yilmaz A, Yildirim H, et al. N-acetyltransferase 2 phenotype may be associated with susceptibility to age-related cataract. Curr Eye Res. 2005;30:835–839. doi: 10.1080/02713680591003799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zetterberg M, Tasa G, Prince JA, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genetic polymorphisms in patients with cataract. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:932–934. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Padma G, Mamata M, Reddy KR, Padma T. Polymorphisms in two DNA repair genes (XPD and XRCC1)—association with age related cataracts. Mol Vis. 2011;17:127–133. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Utheim OA, Ritland JS, Utheim TP, et al. Apolipoprotein E genotype and risk for development of cataract and age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86:401–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01070.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zhang L, Xu JW, Qu X, Liu DR, Liu P, Zhao XZ. Association of a rare haplotype in kinesin light chain 1 gene with age-related cataract in a Han Chinese population. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lin Q, Zhou N, Zhang N, et al. Genetic variations and polymorphisms in the ezrin gene are associated with age-related cataract. Mol Vis. 2013;19:1572–1579. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Zhang Y, Gong J, Zhang L, Xue D, Liu H, Liu P. Genetic polymorphisms of HSP70 in age-related cataract. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2013;18:703–709. doi: 10.1007/s12192-013-0420-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lin Q, Zhou N, Zhang N, Qi Y. Mutational screening of EFNA5 in Chinese age-related cataract patients. Ophthalmic Res. 2014;52:124–129. doi: 10.1159/000363139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Iyengar SK, Klein BE, Klein R, et al. Identification of a major locus for age-related cortical cataract on chromosome 6p12-q12 in the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:14485–14490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400778101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Liao J, Su X, Chen P, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in multiethnic Asians identifies two loci for age-related nuclear cataract. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23:6119–6128. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ritchie MD, Verma SS, Hall MA, et al. Electronic medical records and genomics (eMERGE) network exploration in cataract: several new potential susceptibility loci. Mol Vis. 2014;20:1281–1295. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]