Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2017 Oct 13;11(10):e0005885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005885

Modeling the environmental suitability of anthrax in Ghana and estimating populations at risk: Implications for vaccination and control

Ian T Kracalik 1,2,#, Ernest Kenu 3,#, Evans Nsoh Ayamdooh 4,#, Emmanuel Allegye-Cudjoe 4, Paul Nokuma Polkuu 5, Joseph Asamoah Frimpong 6, Kofi Mensah Nyarko 3, William A Bower 7, Rita Traxler 7, Jason K Blackburn 1,2,*
Editor: Joseph M Vinetz8
PMCID: PMC5656412  PMID: 29028799

Abstract

Anthrax is hyper-endemic in West Africa. Despite the effectiveness of livestock vaccines in controlling anthrax, underreporting, logistics, and limited resources makes implementing vaccination campaigns difficult. To better understand the geographic limits of anthrax, elucidate environmental factors related to its occurrence, and identify human and livestock populations at risk, we developed predictive models of the environmental suitability of anthrax in Ghana. We obtained data on the location and date of livestock anthrax from veterinary and outbreak response records in Ghana during 2005–2016, as well as livestock vaccination registers and population estimates of characteristically high-risk groups. To predict the environmental suitability of anthrax, we used an ensemble of random forest (RF) models built using a combination of climatic and environmental factors. From 2005 through the first six months of 2016, there were 67 anthrax outbreaks (851 cases) in livestock; outbreaks showed a seasonal peak during February through April and primarily involved cattle. There was a median of 19,709 vaccine doses [range: 0–175 thousand] administered annually. Results from the RF model suggest a marked ecological divide separating the broad areas of environmental suitability in northern Ghana from the southern part of the country. Increasing alkaline soil pH was associated with a higher probability of anthrax occurrence. We estimated 2.2 (95% CI: 2.0, 2.5) million livestock and 805 (95% CI: 519, 890) thousand low income rural livestock keepers were located in anthrax risk areas. Based on our estimates, the current anthrax vaccination efforts in Ghana cover a fraction of the livestock potentially at risk, thus control efforts should be focused on improving vaccine coverage among high risk groups.

Author summary

Anthrax is a soil-borne zoonotic disease found worldwide. In the West African nation of Ghana, anthrax outbreaks occur annually with a high burden to livestock keepers and their animals. To control anthrax in both humans and animals, annual livestock vaccination is recommended in endemic regions. However, in resource poor areas distributing and administering vaccine is difficult, in part, due to underreporting, logistical issues, limited resources, and an under appreciation of the geographic extent of anthrax risk zones. Our objective was to model high spatial resolution anthrax outbreak data, collected in Ghana, using a machine learning algorithm (random forest). To achieve this, we used a combination of climatic and environmental characteristics to predict the potential environmental suitability of anthrax, map its distribution, and identify livestock and human populations at risk. Results indicate a marked ecological divide separating the broad areas of environmental suitability in northern Ghana from the southern part of the country, which closely mirrors the ecotone transitions from southern tropical and deciduous forests to the northern Sudanian and Guinea Savanna. Based on our model prediction, we estimated >3 million combined ruminant livestock and low income livestock keepers are situated in anthrax risk zones. These findings suggest a low level of annual livestock vaccination coverage among high risk groups. Thus, integrating control strategies from both the veterinary and human health sectors are needed to improve surveillance and increase vaccine dissemination and adoption by rural livestock keepers in Ghana and the surrounding region.

Introduction

Anthrax is a soil-borne, zoonotic disease found on nearly every continent (except Antarctica) that primarily infects herbivorous animals while secondarily infecting humans through the handling or ingestion of contaminated meat or animal by-products [1,2]. The geographic distribution of the disease appears to be limited by a combination of climatic (e.g. precipitation and temperature) and environmental (e.g. alkaline soil pH) conditions [3,4]. Under the appropriate ecological conditions, which remain poorly understood, the causative agent of anthrax, Bacillus anthracis, can survive for long-periods of time in the environment, perhaps years [1,4]. Although it has received much attention as a potential agent of bioterrorism, the World Health Organization (WHO) has listed anthrax as a neglected disease [5]. Poor livestock keepers and their animals often experience a disproportionate burden of anthrax in the hyper-endemic regions of Central Asia and West Africa [5,6]. Despite the effectiveness of regular animal vaccination and proper outbreak response following recommended guidelines in controlling anthrax in humans, underreporting of the disease often skews its true burden and geographic distribution making it difficult to implement adequate vaccination campaigns [1,7].

In Ghana, anthrax outbreaks have been reported annually in humans associated with contact with infected livestock and their contaminated animal by-products (e.g. meat or hides) [8]. Anthrax vaccine is manufactured locally by the Central Veterinary Laboratory in Pong-Tamale, Ghana and is fully subsidized by the government. Despite this, animal outbreaks are documented annually, and primarily affect cattle. Although both human and animal cases are reported, few human cases are linked to confirmed animal cases [9]. As a result, surveillance data alone provide limited information to efficiently plan prevention activities. Previous efforts to elucidate the environmental suitability of anthrax in Africa have been focused on southern countries, such as Zimbabwe [10], or national parks [11]. A recent study from West Africa also used a machine learning algorithm to map and model the distribution of anthrax and B. anthracis in Cameroon, Chad, and Nigeria, however, that effort was based on limited sample size and no comparable efforts have been carried out in Ghana [12].

To support Ghana’s national anthrax control and assessment, we our study had the following objectives: (1) model the environmental suitability of anthrax; (2) identify environmental and climatic factors associated with the occurrence of anthrax; (3) describe seasonal patterns; and (4) estimate populations at risk.

Methods

Ethics statement

This work was performed on nationally available data on anthrax outbreaks in livestock from the Ministry of Food and Agriculture in Ghana.

Anthrax occurrence data

We constructed a GIS of livestock anthrax outbreaks using data collected by the Ghana Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program (GFELTP) and the Ministry of Food and Agricultural Veterinary Services. (Fig 1). Outbreaks were mapped using GPS coordinates collected by field personnel responding to outbreaks or the center of the village where the outbreak occurred. We included data on outbreaks from 2005 through the first 6-months of 2016 included information on the geographic coordinates, date, livestock species, and number of individual animals infected (periodically recording mortality and survival status) for each outbreak. However, total livestock populations on affected properties was rarely reported. For this study, an outbreak was defined as any location with one or more anthrax cases in animals. We plotted the seasonality of anthrax outbreaks in relation to the average rainfall during 1991–2015 using data obtained from the Climate Change Knowledge Portal (http://sdwebx.worldbank.org/climateportal/index.cfm?page=country_historical_climate&ThisCCode=GHA). We also obtained livestock anthrax vaccine administration data during 2005–2015 from the World Animal health Information Database Interface (OIE; http://www.oie.int/animal-health-in-the-world/the-world-animal-health-information-system/data-after-2004-wahis-interface/). Mapping and spatial analysis was performed in Q-GIS version 2.14 (www.qgis.org) and the R statistical package (https://www.r-project.org/). Final maps were produced in ArcGIS version 10.3.1 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Spatial setting of Ghana in West Africa (inset A) and the geographic distribution of anthrax outbreaks (January 2005—June 2016) and generated pseudo absence data (inset B). The number of outbreaks by region in Ghana (inset C). Political boundary data were downloaded from www.gadm.org and all maps were produced in ArcGIS (www.esri.com; see Methods).

Environmental and climatic data

We used a combination of environmental and climatic variables at a spatial resolution of 30-arcseconds (approximately 1km x 1km) that followed, in part, recent studies in West Africa [13] and Central Asia [14] (Table 1). Five “bioclimatic” variables describing measures of temperature and precipitation were obtained from the WorldClim database (www.worldclim.org) [15]. WorldClim variables are interpolated monthly measurements recorded at weather stations located worldwide between 1950 and 2000. WorldClim produces bioclimatic variable grids to describe annual trends, seasonality, and ecological parameters such as temperature of the coldest and warmest quarters. We also used a combination of physical (sand content), chemical (soil pH), and taxonomic classifications of soil characteristics (cancerous vertisols and humults). Soil data were obtained from the SoilGrids1km database http://www.isric.org/explore/soilgrids) [16]. SoilGrid variables were created using spatial model predictions based on a global database of soil profiles and a combination of environmental covariates. Furthermore, we used two normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) variables describing average conditions and the amplitude of vegetation greenness, which were obtained from the Trypanosomiasis and Land Use in Africa (TALA) research group (Oxford, United Kingdom) [17]. TALA variables were derived from temporal Fourier analysed (TFA) time series data of advanced very-high resolution radiometer (AVHRR) satellite measurements taken between 1992 and 1996 [17]. Mapped variables are shown in S1 Fig.

Table 1. Environmental and climatic variables used in the random forest models.

Environmental variable Variable name Data source Reference
Elevation (m) elevation Worldclim [6]
Mean annual temperature (°C) bio 1 Worldclim [6]
Annual temperature range (°C) bio 7 Worldclim [6]
Annual precipitation (mm) bio 12 Worldclim [6]
Precipitation: wettest month (mm) bio 13 Worldclim [6]
Precipitation driest month (mm) bio 14 Worldclim [6]
Average soil pH soil pH SoilGrids1km [7]
Calcerous vertisols (% coverage) vertisol SoilGrids1km [7]
Humult (% coverage) humult SoilGrids1km [7]
Sand (% mass fraction) sand SoilGrids1km [7]
Temporal Fourier mean NDVI wd0114a0 TALA [8]
Temporal Fourier NDVI annual amplitude wd0114a1 TALA [8]

Data analysis

Random Forest (RF) modeling [18,19] was used to identify environmental characteristics associated with the occurrence of anthrax outbreaks using the ‘randomForest’ package for R. Previous studies have used this approach to map and model the distribution of Anopheles spp. mosquito vectors in Africa and Europe [20] and reservoirs of avian influenza [21]. RF modeling has been described and compared to other modeling approaches in detail elsewhere [18,22]. Briefly, RF is a non-parametric method derived from classification and regression trees that consists of a combination of trees built using randomly selected bootstrap samples of the training data (used to build the model), with the number of bootstrap samples equal to the number of trees (ntrees) selected. Each tree is split by randomly sampling a number of predictor variables to use (mtry) at each node and then choosing the best split. Model error estimates are obtained by internal splits of the training data (63.2% for model building) and then predicting the data not used to build a tree (out-of-bag or OOB) and aggregating these predictions for each ensemble of trees [18]. Since internal validation of the OOB data is performed, no external testing data is required to validate the model, but testing splits (external data withheld from the model) of the data are routinely utilized to assess model performance. Partial dependence plots and variable importance of RF models were assessed for covariates in the model.

We used an ensemble modeling approach that incorporated information from multiple random splits of our data into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets. Since our data consisted of presence only records of anthrax outbreaks, we generated pseudo-absence data from all available background data. Several studies have either relied on internal derivations of pseudo-absence in species distribution models [23] or user-defined generations such as in the modeling of the global distribution of dengue virus [24]. The required number of user-defined background pseudo-absence draws for every presence location is not standardized. It has been suggested that a 1:1 random draw of pseudo-absence to presence data in machine learning algorithms such as RF produces optimal results [25], although variations of this (2:1 or 3:1 draws) have been adopted successfully [24]. Similarly, pseudo-absence data creation has been shown to influence results; thus, research has recommended filtering pseudo-absence data from locations that are known to fall within suitable habitat or that occur within a defined proximity threshold [25,26].

We first filtered geo-located anthrax presence data in Ghana (n = 61) using a 5km x 5km proximity threshold in order to improve model performance and avoid overfitting [27]. We generated background pseudo-absence data (n = 200), from all available background [24], at a ratio of four absence points to every one filtered presence point (n = 50), restricting pseudo-absence data to exclude landscape within 5km of presence locations. We then generated 10 random draws each of 1:1, 2:1, and 3:1 pseudo-absence to presence data (30 total draws) with replacement. Each randomly generated pseudo-absence to presence draw (n = 30) was randomly divided into training and testing data splits to validate model performance. The final RF models were built using a mtry = 4 at each split and ntrees = 1000 with a combination of variables in which the ensemble list contributed to a mean decrease in accuracy >1%. The 30 individual RF models were then combined into an ensemble prediction at a spatial resolution of ~1km x 1km and scaled from 0 (low suitability) to 1 (high suitability); uncertainty in the model prediction was calculated by taking the range in the 95% confidence intervals of the ensemble model scaled from 0 (low uncertainty) to 1 (high uncertainty) following Deribe et al. [28].

The resulting output of our ensemble RF model represents the environmental suitability of anthrax in Ghana. To estimate the number of livestock and poor rural livestock keepers at risk in anthrax suitable areas, we dichotomized the modeled environmental suitability into a suitable versus not suitable prediction using a probability threshold that maximized sensitivity and specificity. We then overlaid a database of global livestock density at a spatial resolution of ~1km x 1km (http://www.livestock.geo-wiki.org/) [29] with the dichotomized anthrax prediction to estimate the livestock populations (cattle, sheep, goats, and swine) at risk. Livestock populations at risk were further stratified to estimate the population at risk within each of the livestock production zones of Ghana using the livestock production systems data version 5 (http://www.livestock.geo-wiki.org/) [2931]. Furthermore, we estimated the number of low income rural livestock keepers at risk within each livestock production zone by overlaying the dichotomized anthrax suitable areas with estimates of the population of low income rural livestock keepers provided in Robinson et al. [31] and deriving the fraction of cells that were within our model prediction. Uncertainty in the populations at risk and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by using the 2.5% (lower) and 97.5% (upper) bounds of the ensemble RF model prediction [28].

Model performance and validation was conducted for each individual RF model and included the internal: OOB error classification, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Additionally, we performed accuracy assessments on the external testing data, which consisted of thirty random subsets of 20% of the data sampled with replacement. Mean values and 95% confidence intervals were estimated for each accuracy metric. The AUC has been used extensively in species distribution modeling to measure the discriminatory performance of models [32]; an AUC value of 1 indicates a perfect discrimination while values of >0.9 are outstanding, 0.8–0.9 excellent, 0.7–0.8 acceptable, and <0.7 indicate poor discriminatory performance [28,33].

Results

Anthrax outbreaks

From 2005 through the first 6 months of 2016, there were 67 reported anthrax outbreaks in livestock (61 that were geo-located) (Fig 1). Nationally, there was a mean of 6 (95% CI: 4, 7) outbreaks per year with a peak in 2011 (n = 12) and lull in reporting in 2009 (n = 2) (Fig 2). The geography of outbreaks shows a higher frequency of anthrax in northern Ghana in the Upper East and Northern regions. Of the reported outbreaks, 4 (6%) were comprised of two or more livestock types. Domestic cattle were reported in 53% (35) of outbreaks, followed by sheep in 32% (21), goats in 11% (7), and swine in 5% (3). During 2005–2016, cattle anthrax cases were reported every year except in 2009. Sheep cases were ubiquitous annually and were characterized by a large number of deaths in 2012, the same year there was also a large number of swine cases (n = 500) (Table 2).

Fig 2. Annual number of livestock anthrax outbreaks in Ghana during January 2005- June 2016.

Fig 2

Table 2. Cases of anthrax by livestock type in Ghana, 2005–2016.

Year Cattle Sheep Goats Swine
2005 27 1 0 0
2006 17 15 0 0
2007 15 9 3 0
2008 21 6 11 0
2009 0 2 0 0
2010 2 1 0 0
2011 13 7 0 3
2012 6 66 1 500
2013 50 14 0 0
2014 3 1 0 1
2015 26 1 0 0
2016 4 6 19 0
Totals 184 129 34 504

The seasonality of anthrax outbreaks nationally and regionally are illustrated in Fig 3. Nationally, outbreaks were reported, on average, across seasons and in every month (except November). There was an increase in outbreaks in the late winter and early spring months, with February through April having the highest reported number of outbreaks. On average, there outbreaks appeared to occur in the dry season before the onset of the rains.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Seasonal distribution of anthrax outbreaks (black bars) during 2005–2016 with average rainfall totals (red line) in Ghana nationally (A) and by region: Upper West (B), Northern (C), Brong Ahafo (D), and Upper East (E). Anthrax outbreaks by Region.

Livestock vaccination

Trends in livestock anthrax vaccination among livestock type are shown in Fig 4. From 2000–20015, there was a median of 17,957 doses [0–175 thousand] of anthrax livestock vaccine administered annually livestock vaccination occurred annually with a median number of doses administered of 19,709 [range: 0–175 thousand doses], followed by a decline in vaccine administration during 2008–2015. No vaccination was administered during the years 2010, 2012, and 2013. During 2008–2015, there was a median of 542 [range: 0–147 thousand doses] doses administered. In response to ongoing outbreaks, there was a vaccination campaign in 2014 that resulted in nearly an 8-fold increase in the number of doses administered compared to the previous six years. Among livestock types, cattle were most frequently administered vaccine, followed by sheep, goats and swine (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Annual livestock anthrax vaccine doses administered in Ghana during January 2005- June 2016.

Fig 4

Environmental suitability of anthrax in Ghana

The ensemble RF model suggests a latitudinal gradient in the environmental suitability of anthrax in Ghana (Fig 5A). High environmental suitability was identified in the Northern, Upper East, and Upper West regions of Ghana that encompass seasonal livestock migration routes from Burkina Faso in the north. Conversely, low or no environmental suitability was identified in southern Ghana among the more acidic soils in the Western, Ashanti, Central, and Eastern regions. Uncertainty (range: 0–0.20) in the model prediction was scaled from 0 to 1 and showed it was highest in the Upper West and Northern regions (Fig 5B). The internal OOB model validation indicated excellent discrimination with an AUC = 0.88 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.89). The external validation of anthrax outbreak locations withheld from the model (testing data) also showed excellent discrimination (AUC = 0.87 [95% CI: 0.85, 0.90]).

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Environmental suitability of anthrax in Ghana as predicted by the ensemble random forest model (inset A). Uncertainty was calculated as the range of the 95% confidence intervals in predicted probability of suitability for each pixel, with areas of highest uncertainty in red, with greener colors representing low uncertainty (inset B).

The final list of variables used in the ensemble model are shown in Fig 6. A combination of bioclimatic, environmental, and soil characteristics had the greatest impact on the OOB prediction errors. The most important variables influencing accuracy were: soil pH, bio7 (annual temperature range), and bio14 (precipitation of the driest month) (S2 Fig). The probability of the occurrence of anthrax increased in a step like manner in response to soil pH, increasing as the soil became more alkaline, between 5.5 and 6.5, and again between 6.5 and 7.0. Annual temperature ranges between 16 and 20°C were also related to a greater probability of occurrence. The occurrence of anthrax showed an affinity for low values of precipitation during the driest month (0 to 10 mm) and then dropped off dramatically as precipitation increased from 10 to 40 mm. Furthermore, as average NDVI (wd0114a0) increased from 0.3 to 0.6 the probability of anthrax occurrence decreased linearly, with a more suitable range of vegetation greenness identified in the lower ranges between 0.1 and 0.3 (Fig 6).

Fig 6. Partial dependency plots of environmental variables used in the random forest.

Fig 6

Gray shading represented confidence intervals derived from the model iterations.

Estimating populations at risk

To estimate livestock and human populations at risk, we dichotomized the environmental suitability prediction (on a continuous probability scale) into suitable versus non-suitable environments for anthrax based on the optimal threshold (0.46) that maximized sensitivity (0.78) plus specificity (0.89) (Fig 7). The dichotomized prediction shows a marked north-south demarcation in the suitability of anthrax, with a majority of northern Ghana predicted as suitable within the accompanying upper (97.5%) and lower (2.5%) confidence bounds.

Fig 7. Dichotomized prediction of anthrax suitability with lower (2.5%) and upper (97.5%) occurrence limits.

Fig 7

Dichotomized prediction was calculated using an optimal probability threshold (0.46) that maximized sensitivity plus specificity.

The national livestock population located in areas environmentally suitable for anthrax was estimated to be ≈ 2.2 (95% CI: 2.0, 2.5) million (Table 3). More than 50% of the livestock populations at risk were sheep and cattle (650 [95% CI: 583, 745] thousand and 480 [95% CI: 434, 527] thousand, respectively). Among livestock production systems, semi-arid rain-fed, mixed crop livestock systems (MRA) contained the greatest number of livestock at risk > 1.2 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.3) million (Table 3).

Table 3. Livestock production systems¥ and the livestock population in the Ghanaian anthrax risk zone.

Population at risk [95% CI] (thousands of livestock)
Livestock LGA LGH MRA MRH MIA
cattle 108.5 [83.1, 123.2] 38.2 [30, 48.8] 283.3 [272.3, 289.7] 49.2 [47.7, 63.8] 1.2 [1.1, 1.2]
sheep 166.2 [125.4, 188] 50.6 [41.2, 74] 368 [353.8, 376.6] 63.9 [61.6, 105.5] 1.2 [1.1, 1.2]
goats 262.3 [201, 301.7] 47.9 [38, 67.8] 509.9 [491.3, 524.2] 117.8 [115, 164] 1.1 [1.0, 1.1]
swine 32.1 [24.7, 36.1] 11.5 [9.8, 17.1] 70.6 [67.6, 72.2] 14.7 [13.9, 24.9] 0.2 [0.2, 0.3]

¥ Livestock production systems (http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2414e/i2414e.pdf)

LGA: Livestock only systems, arid and semi-arid

LGH: Livestock only systems, humid and sub-humid

MRA: Rainfed mixed crop/livestock system, arid and semi-arid

MRH: Rainfed mixed crop/livestock system, humid and sub-humid

MIA: Irrigated mixed crop/livestock systems, arid and semi-arid

Nationally, there are approximately 3 million low income rural livestock keepers in Ghana (Table 4). Our model suggests that ≈ 805 (95% CI: 519, 890) thousand are located in areas suitable for anthrax, with the majority located in a humid and sub-humid, mixed crop livestock system production zone (MRH).

Table 4. Rural low income livestock keepers in the Ghanaian anthrax risk zone by livestock production system.

Population at risk [95% CI] (thousands of people)
Estimates ¥LGA LGH MRA MRH MIA
National 71.1 238.9 411.9 2152.9 1.2 [1.1, 1.2]
Modeled 48.6 [34.1, 56.9] 105.4 [65.7, 120.2] 300 [263.6, 325.1] 346.6 [155, 387.5] 0.4 [0.3, 0.4]

¥ Livestock production systems (http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2414e/i2414e.pdf)

LGA: Livestock only systems, arid and semi-arid

LGH: Livestock only systems, humid and sub-humid

MRA: Rainfed mixed crop/livestock system, arid and semi-arid

MRH: Rainfed mixed crop/livestock system, humid and sub-humid

MIA: Irrigated mixed crop/livestock systems, arid and semi-arid

Discussion

Anthrax is a globally distributed neglected disease that is often underreported, particularly in West Africa where it is hyper-endemic [1,2,6,13]. Given the reliance of control on the vaccination of livestock, understanding the occurrence of anthrax is crucial for identifying populations at risk in order to disseminate limited resources. Here, we used data on the location of livestock outbreaks to identify seasonal patterns and model the environmental suitability of anthrax in Ghana. In keeping with previous studies, our findings indicate a defined outbreak season with a combination of ecological constraints on the potential geographic distribution of anthrax [3,34]. Our modeled prediction suggests a marked ecological divide separating the broad areas of environmental suitability in northern Ghana from the southern part of the country. Additionally, we estimated that populations characteristically at high risk for anthrax, which included >3 million combined ruminant livestock and poor rural livestock keepers are situated within the predicted anthrax risk zone. Based on our estimates, current anthrax vaccination efforts cover only a fraction of the livestock potentially at risk. Hence, these findings can be used to better direct public health intervention strategies and inform surveillance.

Official reports of livestock anthrax in endemic areas often go undocumented for a number of reasons, including the inability or unwillingness to report, limited surveillance capacity, and a lack of local knowledge about the disease [1]. In Ghana, livestock cases are likely underreported due to the slaughter and consumption of sick or dead animals [8,35], consistent with findings in the Caucasus and elsewhere [1,6,36,37]. This practice is often undertaken as a means of recouping economic losses from livestock mortality as well as providing food and a readily available source of protein [1,8,35]. The livestock anthrax outbreak data we used in this study were concordant with data reported to OIE during the same time frame suggesting Veterinary Services in Ghana are compliant with international reporting requirements (http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Wahidhome/Home).

Despite the close proximity to the equator, we identified marked seasonality in anthrax reporting; outbreaks increased during the onset of the rainy season from February through April. Similar patterns of anthrax outbreaks associated with the rainy-season have also been reported in Namibia [34]. One hypothesis suggests that there is greater soil consumption among ruminants during with the rainy season [34], although soil exposure during the dry season has also been hypothesized as a cause of anthrax outbreaks [1]. Regardless, these findings suggest vaccination of livestock could be carried out in Ghana ahead of the peak outbreak season (September–November).

Livestock anthrax control in Ghana follows a similar trend in many endemic regions of reactively vaccinating in response to anthrax outbreaks [1,38]. In Ghana, the livestock population we identified at risk comprises approximately ≈ 25% of the total national livestock population [29]. Based on official vaccination reports (Fig 4), our estimates of the livestock populations at risk indicates poor vaccine coverage; this finding is consistent with ongoing outbreaks in endemic communities in Ghana where vaccination has not been officially documented for at least a decade [39]. Barriers to vaccine uptake such as practices of livestock keepers my also affect coverage [1,40]. However, Ghana faces additional control challenges with the potential presence of B. cereus biovar (bv) anthracis and West Africa strains (D and E Clades, respectively [41]). The West African strains have been hypothesized to evade the Sterne vaccine, which is the vaccine used in Ghana and throughout much of the world [13,42]. Further research is needed on vaccine efficacy and to understand what proportion of anthrax outbreaks are due to either insufficient application methods or the vaccine itself.

Research has suggested that soil pH >6.1 in conjunction with high calcium levels are a crucial component of B. anthracis spore survival [1,4,43]. Alkaline soils were also found to be associated with the persistence of anthrax transmission over several years [43,44]. In keeping with these findings, we identified an increasingly higher likelihood of anthrax occurrence in soils as pH increased from 5.5 to 7.0 and with an increasing level of calcareous vertisols. The association of anthrax suitability with lower levels of precipitation in our model is in line with reports that have documented soil nutrient leaching in regions with high precipitation, which may lead to soil acidification [45]. We predicted an area of environmental suitability for anthrax that encompasses ≈ 36% of Ghana’s total area (Fig 7); this is demarcated by a south (largely unsuitable) to north (highly suitable) divide, which closely mirrors the ecotone transitions from southern tropical and deciduous forests to the northern Sudanian and Guinea Savanna.

Our study had several limitations. As with all neglected zoonoses, our data likely represent an underestimation of the true burden of disease due to underreporting and limited resources for surveillance and testing. To better address issues with diagnostic testing and reporting we used a more contemporary dataset of anthrax outbreaks recorded during the last decade. Anthrax can also be transmitted from contaminated feed that is imported, and animal mortality may occur from livestock moved across long distances; however, we had no information on any outbreaks arising in these instances [1,46]. The use of machine learning algorithms to model the distribution of environmental pathogens has been well described, but such approaches, by their definition in conjunction with the use of averaged climate data, may over-generalize the landscape that supports the occurrence of anthrax outbreaks. Other factors not included in our models that may influence the occurrence of anthrax include the health and immune status of the livestock [47].

In conclusion, the current anthrax situation in West Africa, and in particular Ghana, remains a public and veterinary health threat due to challenges with reporting, surveillance, and control. Our findings suggest that broad areas of northern Ghana are environmentally suitable for anthrax. Furthermore, based on recent vaccination efforts, our estimates indicate that only a fraction of livestock at risk are being vaccinated. These findings can be used to help improve differential diagnostics, vaccine coverage estimates, and surveillance efforts. Given the reliance on agriculture and the large population of low income rural livestock keepers at risk in the northern part of the country where predicted suitability was highest, future control efforts should focus on improving livestock vaccination coverage and public awareness of the disease, prioritizing communities in the predicted anthrax zone.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The spatial distribution of environmental variables used in the random forest models.

Variable names are matched to variable descriptions and sources from Table 1.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Importance plot of variables included in the final ensemble random forest model prediction.

Bars in darker blue represent variables that were more important in discriminating class prediction.

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Sean V. Shadomy for his contributions to the planning of this project, Ernest Konadu Asiedu for his assistance with seeking ethical review, Gladys Antwi for the logistical arrangements, Eugene Murat Yelfaanibe for securing approvals and data access, and Kenneth Gbeddy for approving the use of the data for this project.

Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the US Centers for Disease Control. This was a project funded by and co-performed by US CDC with co-author institutes.

References

  • 1.Turnbull P, Böhm R, Hugh-Jones M, Melling J. Guidelines for the Surveillance and Control of Anthrax in Humans and Animals, Fourth Edition. 2008; 219.
  • 2.Fasanella A, Galante D, Garofolo G, Jones MH. Anthrax undervalued zoonosis. Vet Microbiol. 2010;140: 318–331. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blackburn J, McNyset K, Curtis A, Hugh-Jones M. Modeling the geographic distribution of Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax disease, for the contiguous United States using predictive ecologic niche modeling. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77: 1103 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hugh-Jones M, Blackburn J. The ecology of Bacillus anthracis. Mol Aspects Med. 2009;30: 356–367. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2009.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Great Britain, Department for International Development, Animal Health Programme, International Office of Epizootics, World Health Organization, et al. The Control of neglected zoonotic diseases: a route to poverty alleviation: report of a joint WHO/DFID-AHP meeting, 20 and 21 September 2005, WHO Headquarters, Geneva, with the participation of FAO and OIE. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006.
  • 6.Hugh‐Jones M. 1996–97 global anthrax report. J Appl Microbiol. 1999;87: 189–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abdullayev R, Kracalik I, Ismayilova R, Ustun N, Talibzade A, Blackburn J. Analyzing the spatial and temporal distribution of human brucellosis in Azerbaijan (1995–2009) using spatial and spatio-temporal statistics. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12: 185 doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Opare C, Nsiire A, Awumbilla B, Akanmori BD. Human behavioural factors implicated in outbreaks of human anthrax in the Tamale municipality of northern Ghana. Acta Trop. 2000;76: 49–52. doi: 10.1016/S0001-706X(00)00089-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nsoh AE, Kenu E, Forson EK, Afari E, Sackey S, Nyarko KM, et al. Mapping as a tool for predicting the risk of anthrax outbreaks in Northern Region of Ghana. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;25 Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5257015/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chikerema S, Murwira A, Matope G, Pfukenyi D. Spatial modelling of Bacillus anthracis ecological niche in Zimbabwe. Prev Vet Med. 2013;111: 25–30. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Steenkamp PJ. Ecological suitability modelling for anthrax in the Kruger National Park, South Africa: University of Pretoria; 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Blackburn J. Integrating geographic information systems and ecological niche modeling into disease ecology: a case study of Bacillus anthracis in the United States and Mexico. In: K.P. O’Connell EWS A Sulakvelidze, L Bakanidze, editor. Emerging and Endemic Pathogens: Advances in Surveillance, Detection, and Identification. Springer; 2010. pp. 59–88.
  • 13.Blackburn JK, Odugbo MO, Van Ert M, O’Shea B, Mullins J, Perrenten V, et al. Bacillus anthracis Diversity and Geographic Potential across Nigeria, Cameroon and Chad: Further Support of a Novel West African Lineage. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9: e0003931 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kracalik IT, Blackburn JK, Lukhnova L, Pazilov Y, Hugh-Jones ME, Aikimbayev A. Analysing the spatial patterns of livestock anthrax in Kazakhstan in relation to environmental factors: a comparison of local (Gi*) and morphology cluster statistics. Geospatial Health. 2012;7: 111–126. doi: 10.4081/gh.2012.110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2005;25: 1965–1978. doi: 10.1002/joc.1276 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hengl T, de Jesus JM, MacMillan RA, Batjes NH, Heuvelink GBM, Ribeiro E, et al. SoilGrids1km—Global Soil Information Based on Automated Mapping. Bond-Lamberty B, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e105992 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hay SI, Tatem A, Graham A, Goetz S, Rogers D. Global environmental data for mapping infectious disease distribution. Adv Parasitol. 2006;62: 37–77. doi: 10.1016/S0065-308X(05)62002-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Breiman L. Random Forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45: 5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324 [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Prasad AM, Iverson LR, Liaw A. Newer Classification and Regression Tree Techniques: Bagging and Random Forests for Ecological Prediction. Ecosystems. 2006;9: 181–199. doi: 10.1007/s10021-005-0054-1 [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sinka ME, Bangs MJ, Manguin S, Chareonviriyaphap T, Patil AP, Temperley WH, et al. The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in the Asia-Pacific region: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic précis. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4: 89 doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-89 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cappelle J, Girard O, Fofana B, Gaidet N, Gilbert M. Ecological modeling of the spatial distribution of wild waterbirds to identify the main areas where avian influenza viruses are circulating in the Inner Niger Delta, Mali. EcoHealth. 2010;7: 283–293. doi: 10.1007/s10393-010-0347-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Elith J, Graham CH. Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography. 2009;32: 66–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Blackburn J, McNyset K, Hugh-Jones M, Mitchell M, Curtis A. Predicting the Geographic Distribution of Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax, in Mexico Using Ecological Niche Modelling and Outbreak Data from the United States of America. 2007. pp. 425–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496: 504–507. doi: 10.1038/nature12060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Barbet-Massin M, Jiguet F, Albert CH, Thuiller W. Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many?: How to use pseudo-absences in niche modelling? Methods Ecol Evol. 2012;3: 327–338. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00172.x [Google Scholar]
  • 26.VanDerWal J, Shoo LP, Graham C, Williams SE. Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: How far should you stray from what you know? Ecol Model. 2009;220: 589–594. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.11.010 [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Boria RA, Olson LE, Goodman SM, Anderson RP. Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models. Ecol Model. 2014;275: 73–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Deribe K, Cano J, Newport MJ, Golding N, Pullan RL, Sime H, et al. Mapping and Modelling the Geographical Distribution and Environmental Limits of Podoconiosis in Ethiopia. Soares Magalhaes RJ, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9: e0003946 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Robinson TP, Wint GW, Conchedda G, Van Boeckel TP, Ercoli V, Palamara E, et al. Mapping the Global Distribution of Livestock. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e96084 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thornton P. Mapping poverty and livestock in the developing world. ILRI (aka ILCA and ILRAD); 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Robinson T, FAO, editors. Global livestock production systems. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wiley EO, McNyset KM, Peterson AT, Robins CR, Stewart AM. Niche modeling and geographic range predictions in the marine environment using a machine learning algorithm. Oceanography. 2003;16: 120–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Brooker S, Hay SI, Bundy DAP. Tools from ecology: useful for evaluating infection risk models? Trends Parasitol. 2002;18: 70–74. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(01)02223-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Turner WC, Imologhome P, Havarua Z, Kaaya GP, Mfune JK, Mpofu ID, et al. Soil ingestion, nutrition and the seasonality of anthrax in herbivores of Etosha National Park. Ecosphere. 2013;4: art13. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wastling J., Akanmori B., Williams DJ. Zoonoses in West Africa: Impact and Control. Parasitol Today. 1999;15: 309–311. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4758(99)01488-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kracalik I, Malania L, Imnadze P, Blackburn JK. Human Anthrax Transmission at the Urban–Rural Interface, Georgia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93: 1156–1159. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Doganay M, Metan G. Human anthrax in Turkey from 1990 to 2007. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2009;9: 131–140. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2008.0032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kracalik I, Malania L, Tsertsvadze N, Manvelyan J, Bakanidze L, Imnadze P, et al. Human Cutaneous Anthrax, Georgia 2010–2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20: 261 doi: 10.3201/eid2002.130522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Awoonor-Williams J, Apanga P, Anyawie M, Abachie T, Boidoitsiah S, Opare J, et al. Anthrax Outbreak Investigation among Humans and Animals in Northern Ghana: Case Report. Int J Trop Dis Health. 2016;12: 1–11. doi: 10.9734/IJTDH/2016/22359 [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schelling E, Bechir M, Ahmed MA, Wyss K, Randolph TF, Zinsstag J. Human and Animal Vaccination Delivery to Remote Nomadic Families, Chad. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13: 373–379. doi: 10.3201/eid1303.060391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lista F, Faggioni G, Valjevac S, Ciammaruconi A, Vaissaire J, Le Doujet C, et al. Genotyping of Bacillus anthracis strains based on automated capillary 25-loci multiple locus variable-number tandem repeats analysis. BMC Microbiol. 2006;6: 33 doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-6-33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tamborrini M, Bauer M, Bolz M, Maho A, Oberli MA, Werz DB, et al. Identification of an African Bacillus anthracis lineage that lacks expression of the spore surface-associated anthrose-containing oligosaccharide. J Bacteriol. 2011;193: 3506–3511. doi: 10.1128/JB.00078-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kracalik IT, Malania L, Tsertsvadze N, Manvelyan J, Bakanidze L, Imnadze P, et al. Evidence of local persistence of human anthrax in the country of georgia associated with environmental and anthropogenic factors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7: e2388 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hampson K, Lembo T, Bessell P, Auty H, Packer C, Halliday J, et al. Predictability of anthrax infection in the Serengeti, Tanzania. J Appl Ecol. 2011; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Stoorvogel JJ, Smaling EMA, Janssen BH. Calculating soil nutrient balances in Africa at different scales: I Supra-national scale. Fertil Res. 1993;35: 227–235. doi: 10.1007/BF00750641 [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fasanella A, Garofolo G, Hossain M, Shamsuddin M, Blackburn J, Hugh-Jones M. Bangladesh anthrax outbreaks are probably caused by contaminated livestock feed. Epidemiol Infect. 2012;1: 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cizauskas CA, Turner WC, Wagner B, Küsters M, Vance RE, Getz WM. Gastrointestinal helminths may affect host susceptibility to anthrax through seasonal immune trade-offs. BMC Ecol. 2014;14: 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. The spatial distribution of environmental variables used in the random forest models.

Variable names are matched to variable descriptions and sources from Table 1.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Importance plot of variables included in the final ensemble random forest model prediction.

Bars in darker blue represent variables that were more important in discriminating class prediction.

(TIF)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES