Abstract
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is an Islamic monarchy and was established in 1932. Saudi women first entered the medical field in 1975 and the country has since seen a steady increase in women pursuing medicine. However, there is limited data on gender related issues for women doctors practicing in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, our study objective was to assess the perception amongst peers regarding gender equality and social issues faced by women doctors in Saudi Arabia. An online anonymous cross-sectional survey was administered in English to doctors at King Khalid Hospital, affiliated to King Saud University, in Riyadh, between April and May of 2016. Of 1015 doctors, 304 (30%) participated, of which 129 (42.4%) were females and 231 (76%) were Saudi nationals. The average age was 32.4 years (±SD: 8.7). The majority opined that there was no gender discrimination in salaries (73.7% p-value = 0.4), hospital benefits (62.2% p-value = 0.06) or entry into any field of Medicine/Pediatrics (68.4% p-value = 0.207). However, only a minority believed that there was no gender discrimination for entry into surgery (37.3% p-value = .091). A higher proportion of male doctors agreed that promotion opportunities are equal (66.3% vs 45.7%, p-value = 0.002). However, of 54 consultants, only 18 (33.3%) were women. Over half of the women (52.3%) reported that they never wear the face veil. Only a minority of male and female doctors (12.2%) believed women doctors should wear the veil since they examine male patients. Fewer respondents believed that female doctors face harassment from male doctors (14.5%) whereas 30.7% believed female doctors face harassment from male patients. More females, than males, agreed with the statement that female doctors are as committed to their careers as are males (92.2% vs 67.4%, p-value<0.0001). Of 304 participants, 210 (69.1%) said that they would still choose to become a doctor with approximately equal proportions between males and females (68% vs 70.5%, p-value = 0.79). In conclusion, our survey of male and female doctors at a government university hospital in Saudi Arabia revealed that the majority believed there was gender equality amongst doctors in terms of salaries, benefits, opportunities for promotion and entry into any field of medicine or pediatrics, but not surgery. However, there were significantly fewer women at consultant positions, a deficiency that needs to be addressed.
Introduction
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), established in 1932, is the largest Arab state. [1] It is an Islamic monarchy with a population of over 30 million, two-thirds of which are Saudi nationals. [2, 3] The World Economic Forum's 2016 Global Gender Gap Report has ranked Saudi Arabia 141 out of 144 countries for gender parity. [4] In 2015, Saudi women constituted only 13% of the native work force. [5] However, the number of employed Saudi women with professional careers is increasing, made possible by free education and rapid expansion of institutes of higher education. [6–9] These include King Saud University, the country's first University and medical school and co-incidentally our study site, the Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, the world's largest women-only university, and King Abdullah University of Science and Technology with the first co-educational campus. [10, 11] Nearly 60% of university graduates in Saudi Arabia are women, and the female youth literacy rate (ages 15–24) is 99.3%. [11–13] By 1960, 5% of medical students were women in the United States [14] which increased to nearly 47% in 2014. However, in Saudi Arabia, women did not enter the medical field until 1975, but there has been a steady increase in the numbers of female graduates over the years. [15, 16] In 2016, of 18728 medical graduates, 7590 (40.5%) were women in Saudi Arabia. [17] A study of Saudi secondary school female graduates in 1998 regarding a career in medicine reported concerns about mixing with males (16.7%), and balancing career with family life (12.9%). [18] Today, about 38% of doctors in Saudi Arabia are nationals, with women constituting one-third of all Saudi doctors. [16, 19] Saudi Arabia is one of the wealthiest countries in the world and, in many respects, as modern as any other in terms of public health services, transportation and infrastructure. Teaching hospitals in Saudi Arabia are well funded and doctors follow a western (mostly North American) style of practice, documentation, undergraduate and post-graduate training, performance evaluations and examinations, all of which are conducted in the English language. These similarities allow comparison of this Saudi study of gender equality in the medical field with similar studies conducted in western countries over the past two decades. Western data report increasing parity in numbers, but not in terms of sexual harassment, gender bias, salary and leadership positions. [14, 20–29] There are few studies of gender issues for female doctors in Saudi Arabia, with many more anecdotal subjective perceptions. [30, 31] We hope that our findings will be informative for Saudi girls who are contemplating the medical profession but have concerns, along with their families, regarding its suitability and the prospect of working in a mixed environment. Furthermore, our study provides an opportunity for the Saudi government to address deficiencies identified, given that at present there is sparse data to guide them. Since this influx of women in the medical field in Saudi Arabia is a relatively recent development, our study objective was to survey the opinion of doctors regarding gender equality and social issues faced by women doctors and to further assess differences in perception between male and female doctors.
Methods and materials
This cross-sectional study was carried out at the King Khalid University Hospital (KKUH), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. KKUH is a government teaching hospital that opened in 1982 as a dedicated university hospital. It is affiliated to King Saud University and is an 800-bed facility with all general and subspecialty medical services. It consists of mostly government doctors as well as some private contractual doctors. Study participants were doctors employed full-time, irrespective of nationality, in the clinical fields of Medicine, Surgery, Pediatrics, Obstetrics-Gynecology, Primary Care, Family and Community Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Critical Care, Psychiatry and Dermatology at King Khalid Hospital.
Study tools and minimum sample size required were assessed based on a pilot survey conducted in December 2015. The purpose of the pilot was primarily to evaluate the willingness of doctors to participate in a survey that touched upon controversial issues in Saudi Arabia, including governmental policies, religious and social norms. The survey was provided to departmental secretaries in individual envelopes to be distributed to their doctors. Of 800 questionnaires distributed, only 115 responses were received (14.4%). We attributed the poor response to the effort required by busy doctors to manually fill and submit questionnaires. Furthermore, it is conceivable that doctors were not sure regarding confidentiality since sealed envelopes could be opened prior to reaching the Principal Investigator. On this basis, it was decided to create an online survey which would be convenient and would also allow us to retain all questions of a sensitive nature. Moreover, the online survey would additionally reach those fulltime doctors at King Khalid University hospital that may be on leave or on temporary rotation at another facility. We estimated that a total of 1015 doctors met the study criteria and will receive the online link to our study. The sample size was calculated using the pilot data of 115 participants. Open Epi software was used to calculate the sample size based on a 5% desired precision and assuming there are1015 doctors at KKH. Sample size was calculated separately for the various aspects of interest in the study and the highest sample size of 264 was chosen. We added a 20% attrition rate to it, arriving at a required sample size of 310.
The online survey was created using Google Forms in English. The main themes covered by the questionnaire included gender equality, work environment, harassment, support by department and supervisors, and social issues of women doctors. Perceptions of equality and social issues were assessed within these thematic areas using a Likert scale. Respondents were asked whether they agree, disagree or were neutral/uncertain on questions pertaining to salaries, benefits, duty hours, promotion, evaluation, etc. Both male and female respondents were asked whether they agreed, disagreed or were neutral/uncertain on questions pertaining to gender equality in their salaries, benefits, duty hours, and promotion. Furthermore, some of the questions covered in social aspects included if there could be a negative impact on the marriage if a woman doctor earned more than her husband, whether women should also contribute to the household and/or family expenses or if women doctors should observe the veil while examining male patients. In addition, demographical information such as nationality, age, gender and marital status was included.
After permission from departmental chairpersons, an email with the link to the online questionnaires was sent to departmental secretaries for forwarding to all Saudi as well as non-Saudi doctors on their mailing list. The secretaries also sent weekly reminders. The link was available online from April 27th till May 28th, 2016.
Ethical concerns
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of King Saud University. The survey was anonymous and all potential identifiers such as department and the country of origin, were excluded.
Statistical analysis
Data was transferred from Google forms for analysis into Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0. Mean ± SD was computed for quantitative variables like age, working hours, household hours and sleeping hours. Frequency and percentage were computed for all the qualitative variables. Independent sample T-test/ANOVA was applied as appropriate to assess significant differences in various quantitative variables between male and female doctors, married male and female doctors and doctors who have children. Chi-square test/Fisher-exact test/Likelihood ratio Chi-square test was applied as appropriate to assess significant association among various categorical variables. P-value <0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Demographics
Of an estimated 1015 doctors, 304 (30%) participated in the online survey, of which 129 (42.4%) were women and nearly 76% were Saudi nationals. Participants included 141 residents (46.4%); 54 consultants (17.8%) and 43 interns (14.1%) (Table 1). Over half were currently married (55%) and of the ever-married participants, a third had a spouse who was also a doctor. Of 64 participants whose spouse was a doctor, a significantly higher proportion of women doctors were married to doctors than their male counterparts (47.1% vs 31.1%, p-value = 0.003, Table A in S1 File).
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of 304 doctors at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh.
| Female; 129 (42.4%) | Male; 175 (57.6%) | Total | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professional Level; n (%) | ||||
| Intern | 18 (14) | 25 (14.3) | 43 (14.1) | 0.206† |
| Resident | 64 (49.6) | 77 (44) | 141 (46.4) | |
| Fellow | 4 (3.1) | 12 (6.9) | 16 (5.3) | |
| Consultant | 18 (14) | 36 (20.6) | 54 (17.8) | |
| Registrar | 7 (5.4) | 6 (3.4) | 13 (4.3) | |
| Senior Registrar | 8 (6.2) | 11 (6.3) | 19 (6.3) | |
| Demonstrator | 8 (6.2) | 3 (1.7) | 11 (3.6) | |
| Other | 2 (1.6) | 5 (2.9) | 7 (2.3) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Marital status | ||||
| Single | 61 (47.3) | 71 (40.6) | 132 (43.4) | 0.506ǂ |
| Married | 66 (51.2) | 101 (57.7) | 167 (54.9) | |
| Divorced | 2 (1.6) | 3 (1.7) | 5 (1.6) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Nationality | ||||
| Non-Saudi | 36 (27.9) | 37 (21.1) | 73 (24) | 0.172† |
| Saudi | 93 (72.1) | 138 (78.9) | 231 (76) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Mother had profession, now or in the past; n (%) | ||||
| No | 63 (48.8) | 111 (63.8) | 174 (57.4) | 0.009*† |
| Yes | 66 (51.2) | 63 (36.2) | 129 (42.6) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 174 (100) | 303 (100) | |
| Age in Years | ||||
| Single | 28.4 ± 5.7 | 27 ± 2.6 | 36.3 ± 9.4 | 0.129ɫ |
| Married | 34.9 ± 9.4 | 37.2 ± 9.3 | 27.6 ± 4.4 | 0.069ɫ |
| Divorced | 27 ± 1.4 | 30.3 ± 2.3 | 29 ± 2.5 | 0.174ɫ |
| Total | 31.7 ± 8.5 | 32.9 ± 8.8 | 32.4 ± 8.7 | 0.233ɫ |
*P-value<0.05
ɫ Independent Sample T-test
†Chi-square test
ǂLikelihood-ratio Chi-square test
Of 304 participants, a significantly higher proportion of women had working mothers as compared to men (51.2% vs 36.2%, p-value = 0.009, Table 1). Also, younger respondents (≤30 years) had a higher proportion of working mothers than the older respondents (49.7% vs 32.5%, p-value = 0.003, Table A in S1 File).
Of 213 Saudi doctors, 73 (34.3%) had been sponsored by the government of Saudi Arabia for study or training to a western country with almost equal proportion between males and females (35.4% vs 32.5%, p-value = 0.669, Table B in S1 File). Nearly 92% of the Saudi consultants were trained in a western country through Saudi government sponsorship (Table B in S1 File).
Average daily hours of work, housework and sleep
There were no differences in the self-reported daily working hours (8.5 ± 1.9) and sleeping hours per night (5.9 ± 1.1) amongst men and women. However, significant gender differences existed in self-reported daily household and caring for family hours. Women reported spending significantly more hours on housework and caring for family than their male counterparts (5.3±3 vs 4.2±2.6, p-value = 0.02, Table C in S1 File). Married women with children spent more hours on household work and caring for family as compared to their married female colleagues without children (5.9±3.2 vs 3.5±1.5, p-value = 0.004, Table C in S1 File) A significantly higher proportion of females spending ≥4 hours on housework and family were of the opinion that female doctors should have less duty hours than their male counterparts as compared to females spending <4 hours (35.1% vs 14.3%, p-value = 0.035 Table D in S1 File).
Gender equality and social support at the work place for doctors of similar nationality, qualifications, professional level, competence and years of experience
A higher proportion of male participants believed salaries, hospital benefits, and the opportunity to enter any field of Medicine, Pediatrics or Surgery are equivalent for both male and female doctors, though not statistically significant (Table 2).
Table 2. Perception of doctors regarding gender equality between doctors who are of similar nationality, qualifications, professional level, competence, and years of experience at King Khalid University Hospital.
| Gender | Total | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | |||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
| Salaries are equivalent | ||||
| Agree | 90 (69.8) | 134 (76.6) | 224 (73.7) | 0.412† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 23 (17.8) | 24 (13.7) | 47 (15.5) | |
| Disagree | 16 (12.4) | 17 (9.7) | 33 (10.9) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Hospital benefits are equivalent | ||||
| Agree | 71 (55) | 118 (67.4) | 189 (62.2) | 0.061† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 27 (20.9) | 22 (12.6) | 49 (16.1) | |
| Disagree | 31 (24) | 35 (20) | 66 (21.7) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Duty hours are equivalent | ||||
| Agree | 103 (80.5) | 122 (69.7) | 225 (74.3) | 0.101† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 10 (7.8) | 19 (10.9) | 29 (9.6) | |
| Disagree | 15 (11.7) | 34 (19.4) | 49 (16.2) | |
| Total | 128 (100) | 175 (100) | 303 (100) | |
| There is equal opportunity for entering any field of Medicine/Pediatrics | ||||
| Agree | 82 (63.6) | 126 (72) | 208 (68.4) | 0.207† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 27 (20.9) | 24 (13.7) | 51 (16.8) | |
| Disagree | 20 (15.5) | 25 (14.3) | 45 (14.8) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| There is equal opportunity for entering any field of Surgery | ||||
| Agree | 39 (30.5) | 74 (42.3) | 113 (37.3) | 0.091† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 34 (26.6) | 43 (24.6) | 77 (25.4) | |
| Disagree | 55 (43) | 58 (33.1) | 113 (37.3) | |
| Total | 128 (100) | 175 (100) | 303 (100) | |
| Female doctors should have less duty hours than their male counterparts | ||||
| Agree | 35 (27.1) | 26 (14.9) | 61 (20.1) | 0.003*† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 16 (12.4) | 12 (6.9) | 28 (9.2) | |
| Disagree | 78 (60.5) | 137 (78.3) | 215 (70.7) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| There is equal opportunity for promotion | ||||
| Agree | 59 (45.7) | 116 (66.3) | 175 (57.6) | 0.002*† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 35 (27.1) | 29 (16.6) | 64 (21.1) | |
| Disagree | 35 (27.1) | 30 (17.1) | 65 (21.4) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| There is favoritism by male supervisors towards females in performance evaluations, grades and promotions | ||||
| Agree | 16 (12.4) | 101 (57.7) | 117 (38.5) | 0.000**† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 37 (28.7) | 44 (25.1) | 81 (26.6) | |
| Disagree | 76 (58.9) | 30 (17.1) | 106 (34.9) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
*P-value<0.05
**P-value<0.0001
†Chi-square test
A higher proportion of male doctors agreed with the statement that promotion opportunities are the same for both male and female doctors (66.3% vs 45.7%, p-value = 0.002); and that there was favoritism by male supervisors towards female doctors in performance evaluations, grades and promotions (57.7% vs 12.4%, p-value<0.0001, Table 2).
A higher proportion of non-Saudis as compared with Saudis thought that salaries, hospital benefits and duty hours are not equivalent for both male and female doctors (26% vs 6.1%, p-value<0.0001; 24.7% vs 20.8%, p-value = 0.034 and 24.7% vs 13.5%, p-value = 0.007 respectively; Table E in S1 File).
Regardless of gender and nationality, more than half of the participants believed they receive informational and instrumental support from their department and supervisors. (55.6% and 53.9%, Table 3 and Table F in S1 File) respectively. However, mixed responses were obtained when asked about whether supervisors provide emotional support during times of stress or unhappiness (p-value = 0.582; Table 3) A significantly higher proportion of non-Saudi doctors as compared to Saudi doctors agreed that supervisors provided emotional support when needed (47.9% vs 35.5%; p-value = 0.041; Table F in S1 File).
Table 3. Perception amongst doctors regarding support provided to them by their department and supervisors at King Khalid University Hospital.
| Gender | Total | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | |||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
| Supervisors provide emotional support during times of stress or unhappiness | ||||
| Agree | 52 (40.3) | 65 (37.1) | 117 (38.5) | 0.582† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 16 (12.4) | 29 (16.6) | 45 (14.8) | |
| Disagree | 61 (47.3) | 81 (46.3) | 142 (46.7) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Department provides informational support such as departmental updates and guidance | ||||
| Agree | 72 (55.8) | 97 (55.4) | 169 (55.6) | 0.157† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 26 (20.2) | 23 (13.1) | 49 (16.1) | |
| Disagree | 31 (24) | 55 (31.4) | 86 (28.3) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Supervisors provide instrumental support and help in finishing a task, if need be | ||||
| Agree | 65 (50.4) | 99 (56.6) | 164 (53.9) | 0.422† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 25 (19.4) | 25 (14.3) | 50 (16.4) | |
| Disagree | 39 (30.2) | 51 (29.1) | 90 (29.6) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
†Chi-square test
Female doctors working in a non-segregated environment
More than half of the female doctors (n = 67 (52.3%)) reported that they never wear the veil, 46 (35.9%) always wear the veil, whereas 15 (11.8%) wear the veil either inside or outside the hospital. Of those who wore the veil (n = 61), the majority (88.5%) were Saudis (p-value<0.0001).
Over half the women doctors stated that, under their white coats, they wore a skirt and blouse (54.7%); followed by scrubs (27.3%) (Table 4). A significantly higher proportion of female doctors than male agreed that female doctors could wear scrubs if they preferred (91.5% vs 77.7%; p-value = 0.006) and that the face veil prevents optimal doctor to patient communication (32.6% vs 20%; p-value = 0.008, Table 4). However, a higher proportion of male doctors felt that all female doctors should cover their face as they examine male patients (16.6% vs 6.2%; p-value<0.0001, Table 4).
Table 4. Hospital attire of women doctors at King Khalid University Hospital.
| Marital status | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regarding the face veil (niqab) | Married | Single/divorced | Total | |
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
| I do not wear the veil | 38 (58.5) | 29 (46) | 67 (52.3) | 0.159† |
| I wear the veil | 27 (41.5) | 34 (54) | 61 (47.7) | |
| Total | 65 (100) | 63 (100) | 128 (100) | |
| Dress code | Nationality | P-value | ||
| Non-Saudis | Saudis | Total | ||
| Scrubs | 7 (20) | 28 (30.1) | 35 (27.3) | 0.013*† |
| Skirt & blouse | 15 (42.9) | 55 (59.1) | 70 (54.7) | |
| Trousers & blouse | 13 (37.1) | 10 (10.8) | 23 (18) | |
| Total | 35 (100) | 93 (100) | 128 (100) | |
| Gender | Total | P-value | ||
| Female | Male | |||
| Female trainees can wear scrubs under white coats | ||||
| Agree | 118 (91.5) | 136 (77.7) | 254 (83.6) | 0.006*† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 7 (5.4) | 22 (12.6) | 29 (9.5) | |
| Disagree | 4 (3.1) | 17 (9.7) | 21 (6.9) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Veil prevents optimal doctor to patient communication since the doctor's face is hidden | ||||
| Agree | 42 (32.6) | 35 (20) | 77 (25.3) | 0.008*† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 27 (20.9) | 28 (16) | 55 (18.1) | |
| Disagree | 60 (46.5) | 112 (64) | 172 (56.6) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| All female doctors should wear the veil since they examine male patients | ||||
| Agree | 8 (6.2) | 29 (16.6) | 37 (12.2) | 0.000**† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 17 (13.2) | 41 (23.4) | 58 (19.1) | |
| Disagree | 104 (80.6) | 105 (60) | 209 (68.8) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Male and female doctors' attire should comply with infection control guidelines of keeping sleeves above the wrists and pinning head scarves and veils. | ||||
| Agree | 85 (65.9) | 123 (70.3) | 208 (68.4) | 0.530*† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 32 (24.8) | 34 (19.4) | 66 (21.7) | |
| Disagree | 12 (9.3) | 18 (10.3) | 30 (9.9) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
*P-value<0.05
**P-value<0.0001
†Chi-square test
Regardless of gender, most of the participants were of the opinion that female doctors appear confident and male and female doctors interact comfortably in a mutually respectful environment, which is safe for female doctors. (Table 5).
Table 5. Aspects of working in a mixed environment for male and female doctors at King Khalid University Hospital.
| Gender | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | Total | ||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
| Female doctors appear to be as confident in their work environment as do the male doctors. | ||||
| Agree | 105 (81.4) | 125 (71.4) | 230 (75.7) | 0.128† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 10 (7.8) | 23 (13.1) | 33 (10.9) | |
| Disagree | 14 (10.9) | 27 (15.4) | 41 (13.5) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Male and female doctors appear to interact comfortably with each other in the work environment. | ||||
| Agree | 99 (76.7) | 138 (78.9) | 237 (78) | 0.908† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 13 (10.1) | 16 (9.1) | 29 (9.5) | |
| Disagree | 17 (13.2) | 21 (12) | 38 (12.5) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Male and female doctors appear to work in a mutually respectful environment. | ||||
| Agree | 107 (82.9) | 150 (85.7) | 257 (84.5) | 0.068† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 15 (11.6) | 9 (5.1) | 24 (7.9) | |
| Disagree | 7 (5.4) | 16 (9.1) | 23 (7.6) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Male doctors resent female doctors that are senior to them and do not like taking orders from them. | ||||
| Agree | 22 (17.1) | 23 (13.1) | 45 (14.8) | 0.007*† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 40 (31) | 31 (17.7) | 71 (23.4) | |
| Disagree | 67 (51.9) | 121 (69.1) | 188 (61.8) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Female doctors are safe and secure in the hospital environment during their night duties when on-call. | ||||
| Agree | 90 (69.8) | 134 (76.6) | 224 (73.7) | 0.223† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 20 (15.5) | 26 (14.9) | 46 (15.1) | |
| Disagree | 19 (14.7) | 15 (8.6) | 34 (11.2) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Female doctors can examine the male urogenital system. | ||||
| Agree | 47 (36.4) | 94 (53.7) | 141 (46.4) | 0.008*† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 40 (31) | 34 (19.4) | 74 (24.3) | |
| Disagree | 42 (32.6) | 47 (26.9) | 89 (29.3) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Male doctors can examine the female urogenital system. | ||||
| Agree | 59 (45.7) | 99 (56.6) | 158 (52) | 0.046*† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 36 (27.9) | 29 (16.6) | 65 (21.4) | |
| Disagree | 34 (26.4) | 47 (26.9) | 81 (26.6) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
*P-value<0.05
†Chi-square test
A significantly higher proportion of male doctors were of the opinion that it is acceptable for female doctors to examine the male urogenital system and male doctors to examine the female urogenital system (53.7% vs 36.4%, p-value = 0.008 and 56.6% vs 45.7%, p-value = 0.046 respectively-Table 5). Overall, of 304 participants, 133 (43.8%) agreed that doctors can examine the urogenital system of the opposite sex.
Regarding whether female doctors face harassment from male doctors, a higher proportion of female doctors ≤30 years of age agreed with the statement as compared to female doctors >30 years (20.7% vs 6.4%, p-value = 0.036, Table 6) whereas, regardless of age, most of the male doctors disagreed with the statement (63.2%, p-value = 0.881, Table 6).
Table 6. Harassment of women doctors at King Khalid University Hospital.
| Gender | Age | Total | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤30 | >30 | ||||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |||
| Female | Female doctors face harassment by male doctors | ||||
| Agree | 17 (20.7) | 3 (6.4) | 20 (15.5) | 0.036*† | |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 26 (31.7) | 12 (25.5) | 38 (29.5) | ||
| Disagree | 39 (47.6) | 32 (68.1) | 71 (55) | ||
| Total | 82 (100) | 47 (100) | 129 (100) | ||
| Male | Agree | 14 (14.4) | 10 (13) | 24 (13.8) | 0.881*† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 21 (21.6) | 19 (24.7) | 40 (23) | ||
| Disagree | 62 (63.9) | 48 (62.3) | 110 (63.2) | ||
| Total | 97 (100) | 77 (100) | 174 (100) | ||
| Overall | Agree | 31 (17.3) | 13 (10.5) | 44 (14.5) | 0.201† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 47 (26.3) | 31 (25) | 78 (25.7) | ||
| Disagree | 101 (56.4) | 80 (64.5) | 181 (59.7) | ||
| Total | 179 (100) | 124 (100) | 303 (100) | ||
| Female | Female doctors face harassment by male patients | ||||
| Agree | 37 (45.1) | 10 (21.3) | 47 (36.4) | 0.002*† | |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 28 (34.1) | 14 (29.8) | 42 (32.6) | ||
| Disagree | 17 (20.7) | 23 (48.9) | 40 (31) | ||
| Total | 82 (100) | 47 (100) | 129 (100) | ||
| Male | Agree | 32 (33) | 14 (18.2) | 46 (26.4) | 0.061† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 38 (39.2) | 32 (41.6) | 70 (40.2) | ||
| Disagree | 27 (27.8) | 31 (40.3) | 58 (33.3) | ||
| Total | 97 (100) | 77 (100) | 174 (100) | ||
| Overall | Agree | 69 (38.5) | 24 (19.4) | 93 (30.7) | 0.000**† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 66 (36.9) | 46 (37.1) | 112 (37) | ||
| Disagree | 44 (24.6) | 54 (43.5) | 98 (32.3) | ||
| Total | 179 (100) | 124 (100) | 303 (100) | ||
*P-value<0.05
**P-value<0.0001
†Chi-square test
When asked about whether female doctors face harassment from male patients, we found that regardless of gender, a significantly higher proportion of young doctors of age ≤30 agreed with the statement as compared to those >30 years of age (38.5% vs 19.4%, p-value<0.0001 Table 6)
Social aspects for female doctors
Almost half of both male and female doctors did not believe that women are perceived as more eligible for marriage by becoming doctors (49.7% vs 48.8%, p-value = 0.375). A significantly higher proportion of male doctors agreed that if female doctors marry someone with a medical background, it will be better for marital harmony (68% vs 45%, p-value<0.0001). A significantly higher proportion of male doctors were of the opinion that female doctors should contribute, alongside men, to the household and family expenses (72.6% vs 57.4%, p-value = 0.012, Table 7).
Table 7. Social Aspects for Women Doctors at King Khalid University Hospital n = 304.
| Gender | Total | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | |||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
| Women improve their eligibility for marriage by becoming doctors | ||||
| Agree | 13 (10.1) | 26 (14.9) | 39 (12.8) | 0.375† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 53 (41.1) | 62 (35.4) | 115 (37.8) | |
| Disagree | 63 (48.8) | 87 (49.7) | 150 (49.3) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| If female doctors earn more than their husbands, it may impact negatively on the marriage due to resentment of the husband. | ||||
| Agree | 45 (34.9) | 60 (34.3) | 105 (34.5) | 0.677† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 44 (34.1) | 53 (30.3) | 97 (31.9) | |
| Disagree | 40 (31) | 62 (35.4) | 102 (33.6) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| It would be better for female doctors to marry someone with a medical background for greater marital understanding and harmony. | ||||
| Agree | 58 (45) | 119 (68) | 177 (58.2) | 0.000**† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 25 (19.4) | 32 (18.3) | 57 (18.8) | |
| Disagree | 46 (35.7) | 24 (13.7) | 70 (23) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Female doctors should not work while their children are <6 years old | ||||
| Agree | 31 (24) | 46 (26.3) | 77 (25.3) | 0.634† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 29 (22.5) | 45 (25.7) | 74 (24.3) | |
| Disagree | 69 (53.5) | 84 (48) | 153 (50.3) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Female doctors should contribute to the household and family expenses | ||||
| Agree | 74 (57.4) | 127 (72.6) | 201 (66.1) | 0.012*† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 25 (19.4) | 27 (15.4) | 52 (17.1) | |
| Disagree | 30 (23.3) | 21 (12) | 51 (16.8) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Female doctors should have the permission to drive since they may be required to in a medical emergency | ||||
| Agree | 105 (81.4) | 115 (65.7) | 220 (72.4) | 0.006*† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 14 (10.9) | 27 (15.4) | 41 (13.5) | |
| Disagree | 10 (7.8) | 33 (18.9) | 43 (14.1) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Female doctors are as equally committed to their careers as are male doctors. | ||||
| Agree | 119 (92.2) | 118 (67.4) | 237 (78) | 0.000**† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 8 (6.2) | 21 (12) | 29 (9.5) | |
| Disagree | 2 (1.6) | 36 (20.6) | 38 (12.5) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
| Female doctors are more likely to leave their jobs than men | ||||
| Agree | 42 (32.6) | 99 (56.9) | 141 (46.5) | 0.000**† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 30 (23.3) | 39 (22.4) | 69 (22.8) | |
| Disagree | 57 (44.2) | 36 (20.7) | 93 (30.7) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 174 (100) | 303 (100) | |
| If I were to choose all over again, I would still choose to become a doctor. | ||||
| Agree | 91 (70.5) | 119 (68) | 210 (69.1) | 0.790† |
| Neutral or Uncertain | 13 (10.1) | 22 (12.6) | 35 (11.5) | |
| Disagree | 25 (19.4) | 34 (19.4) | 59 (19.4) | |
| Total | 129 (100) | 175 (100) | 304 (100) | |
*P-value<0.05
**P-value<0.0001
†Chi-square test
Almost all of the female participants, compared to males, were of the opinion that female doctors are as committed to their careers as are males (92.2% vs 67.4%, p-value<0.0001, Table 7). A significantly higher proportion of male doctors were of the opinion that female doctors are more likely to leave their jobs (56.9% vs 32.6%, p-value<0.0001, Table 7). However, of 304, 53 (17.4%) had taken a gap in their professional working life of which 16 (30.2%) had taken a gap due to family obligations, other than maternity leave, with almost equal proportion between males and females (male: 7(30.4%) and female: 9(31%), p-value = 0.010; Table A in S1 File)
Of 304 participants, 210 (69.1%) said that if they were asked to choose again, they would still choose to become a doctor with almost equal proportions between males and females (68% vs 70.5%, p-value = 0.790).
In comparison to male doctors, a significantly higher proportion of female doctors agreed that female doctors should have the permission to drive (65.7% vs 81.4%, p-value = 0.006).
Discussion
Our survey shows that regardless of gender or nationality, the majority of participants were of the opinion that there was gender equality amongst doctors in terms of salaries, benefits, duty hours, performance evaluations and opportunities for promotion.
There exist about 415 governmental and 127 private hospitals in Saudi Arabia. [32] The Saudi Ministry of Civil Affairs mandates a fixed pay scale according to the professional level, years of experience, and nationality for all government doctors, irrespective of gender. [33, 34] Our results for gender parity in pay could therefore be extrapolated to Government doctors throughout Saudi Arabia.
A recent study from the United States found that female physicians at 24 public medical schools earned an average of 8% less than males. [35] Similarly, a pay gap for women in Medicine exists in the United Kingdom. [27]
Though most of our respondents thought that there were equal opportunities for promotion, with over half of male doctors believing that females were actually favored, we found that only about one-third of the consultants were females. A 2004 study of Saudi women in academic medicine similarly found that promotion to higher ranks lagged behind males. This was attributed to family responsibilities, lack of institutional support, and bias. [36] Equally in the West, despite parity in numbers, a disproportionately lower number of women achieve leading medical positions. [14, 20, 23, 25, 26, 28, 29] One of the pre-requisites for a consultant position at King Saud University is training abroad, usually at a recognized western institution. [37] Sponsorship by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for study abroad covers travel, tuition, insurance and living expenses for recipients, their spouses and children. [38] In 2013, of 126,745 total Saudi students studying abroad, 21,599 were in the discipline of Health and Social Sciences, of which 35.2% were Saudi women. [39] We found that an approximately equal proportion of male and female doctors had received sponsorship at some stage of their training. Nevertheless, women doctors are likely to have greater family responsibilities by the time they are required to pursue further training abroad for consultant position and may not be in a position to avail the opportunity, though equally available to them by law. Furthermore, women may not have the support of their male guardians, despite the recent royal decree relaxing male guardianship laws, thus allowing women to benefit from government services such as education and healthcare without requiring permission. [40] The lower representation of women in leading positions could also be a reflection of the slower entry of women in smaller numbers into the medical field. However, if this deficiency is to be remedied, the rules of promotion need to be relaxed for deserving women doctors in view of family obligations and/or restrictions, provision of greater institutional support for women with children and improving and recognizing national training programs.
Only about one-third of our respondents felt that females have equal opportunity to enter any field of surgery. Indeed, there are few female surgeons in Saudi Arabia [19]. In the United States, women still represent only 36% of training and 15% of practicing surgeons. [41, 42] A study of 334 women surgeons in the USA revealed that the majority perceived gender-based discrimination during medical school, residency and practice. [43]
We found no difference in daily working hours, averaging 8.5, between male and female doctors. A survey in the United States of 1049 academic physicians found that women spent 8.5 more hours per week on domestic activities and were more likely to take time off for child care than men. [44] A 2016 survey in the United States found that women worked shorter hours than men. [45] A 2013 Canadian study reported that among women, but not men, marriage and raising children resulted in fewer work hours. [46] Moreover, a 2000 study reported that women were 1.6 times more likely to experience burnout than men, their risk increasing with additional hours above a 40 hour week. [47] In a study from Saudi Arabia, of 174 female doctors, 43.1% felt they had not achieved a satisfactory balance between career and family, and 51.7% felt that their work impacted negatively on their family relationships. [48] Despite these well recognized challenges for women, only a minority of our respondents advocated shorter working hours for female doctors or not working at all while they have small children. Apart from maternity leave, our study did not find that more females than males had undertaken a gap in their professional life due to family obligations. Our study also demonstrated that the majority of females are committed to their careers and confident of their choice. A USA 2016 survey noted that only 58% of women said they would choose medicine again, and 38% their own specialty. [45] In a major study in JAMA, women tended to be more satisfied than men with their specialty but less satisfied with their level of autonomy, pay and resources. [49]
Studies to determine whether females are socially integrated in the profession of medicine suggest that women typically receive more emotional support than men but less informational and instrumental support by their department, supervisors and co-workers. [50] However, the results of this survey did not reveal any gendered patterns of support amongst our participants but requires more in-depth study.
Saudi Arabia is a conservative society and this culture is challenged daily by the mixed work environment of modern day hospitals. Requests for all-female hospitals have periodically emerged but gone unheeded. [51, 52] There are no special provisions for female doctors stipulated by the government of Saudi Arabia other than the dress code. The Ministry of Health requires women doctors to wear a head scarf and a white coat over modest attire, with most in our study preferring skirt and blouse. Surprisingly, irrespective of gender, there was a high acceptance of scrubs for female doctors, with only a minority disapproving. Only about one-third of our female respondents always wore the veil. Regarding doctors' attire from the patients' perspective, a 2012 Saudi study found that of 399 male and female patients, most (73%) preferred that female doctors wear long skirts with only 5.5% preferring scrubs and 39.8% preferring that female doctors cover their face. [53] In another Saudi study, about one-third (31.3%) of patients preferred that female doctors cover their face. [54] It is of concern that almost one-third of the doctors were not agreeable to conforming their hospital attire to good and simple infection control practices such as keeping sleeves above the wrists and pinning head scarves (worn by men and women), and veils.
A directive from the Ministry of Health allows male doctors to examine female patients in the presence of a nurse. [55] There are no laws against female doctors examining males. Despite legal sanction, our study demonstrated that less than half of our participants approved of doctors examining the urogenital system of the opposite sex. A 2016 study from the USA found a gender divide in the surgical practice of urology in that female surgeons operated on a significantly higher percent of female patients (54.4% vs 32.5%, p <0.01) and performed significantly more female specific procedures than their male counterparts (18 vs 10 per year, p <0.001). [56]
A minority of our respondents felt that female doctors were subject to harassment by male doctors and patients. A 2013 study of residents at three hospitals in Saudi Arabia found that sexual harassment was reported in 19.3% and significantly more by females (P = .0061). [57] A 2000 survey in the USA of 3000 full-time faculty members found that about half of the female faculty had experienced sexual harassment. [21] More recently, in a 2016 study in the USA of 1,066 physician-scientists, 30% of women reported sexual harassment and 66% gender bias in professional advancement. [58]
The average age of marriage for females is 25 years in Saudi Arabia. [59] Our study suggests that women doctors may be marrying later. Since one-third of our doctors were married to doctors, this may be another trend in the medical field, whereby doctors are finding their own partners as opposed to entering traditionally arranged marriages, but it requires further studies. Our study did not find that women doctors in Saudi Arabia are considered more eligible for marriage, which is unlike the situation in Pakistan, where doctor brides signify status. [60]
Although two-thirds of our participants were either unsure or disagreed that husbands could become resentful if their wives earned more, in western countries where women are increasingly on track to earn more than their husbands, this gender dynamic remains unresolved. [61] Indeed, in Saudi Arabia, women own 40% of family run companies, with over 44 billion USD in cash, funds and real estate investments. [62] They are catered to by women-only banks. In accordance with Islamic jurisprudence, women are not obligated to share their wealth with their family or husband or to provide for the household. [63] Almost one-fourth of our female doctors preferred to exercise this option though significantly more of the male doctors believed that females should share the economic burden.
No study of the social issues of any sector of women in Saudi Arabia can be complete without mention of the ban on women driving, which remains a major impediment to the successful integration of women in the economic domain. [62, 64] However, as predicted, economic reforms have catalyzed socio-cultural change and, by royal decree, the ban on women driving will be lifted in June 2018. [65, 66] Already, in the realm of politics, history was made whereby in 2015, women won seats in Saudi Arabia’s municipal polls which were the first ever elections open to female voters and candidates. [67] Likewise, in sports, Saudi women athletes competed in the Olympics for the first time in 2012 and 2016. This was followed by a reversal of a long standing ban on sports for women and girls in public schools which will now be offering physical education programs. [68, 69] These changes are in keeping with the goals of Vision 2030, an ambitious road map to reduce Saudi Arabia’s dependence on oil, diversify its economy and develop sectors such as health, education, infrastructure, sports, recreation and tourism. [70]
Several limitations of our study should be mentioned. Our response rate is not high, as is true for most physician surveys. [71] Moreover, less than half of our respondents were women. Our data is subjective self-reports based on perceptions of individual doctors whereas actual numerical data for variables such as salaries, benefits, grades, promotions and gender distribution in various fields would be more compelling. Our survey may be subject to some bias whereby respondents who are aware of the negative international image and scrutiny of Saudi Arabia in regards to women, wish to portray a more positive picture. Survey analysts have also shown that those with more positive experiences are more likely to answer surveys. This data could further be weakened if doctors were insecure regarding the confidentiality and anonymity of a survey that broached sensitive issues in a conservative society. Contractual expatriates, in particular, may be less bold than nationals in expressing their opinions. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of data on gender issues of females in medicine or any other field in Saudi Arabia. Our study addresses that deficiency at a time when increasing numbers of well-educated and highly qualified women are entering the workforce in Saudi Arabia. We believe that our study also begins to challenge the prevailing stereotype internationally of women in Saudi Arabia, a crucial step in promoting greater understanding amongst people of different cultures.
Conclusion
Our survey of male and female doctors at a Government University hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, revealed that the majority of participants were of the opinion that there was gender equality amongst doctors in terms of salaries, benefits, duty hours, performance evaluations, opportunities for promotion and entry into any field of medicine or pediatrics, but not surgery. The majority also perceived women doctors to be working confidently in a mutually respectful, professional and safe environment, and to be as committed to their careers as male doctors. Women appear to be satisfied with their current status and the choice of their profession. However, there were significantly fewer women at consultant positions, a deficiency which must be addressed.
Supporting information
Table A. Personal Information regarding region of birth in Saudi Arabia, profession of spouse and mother and whether any gap in professional life.
Table B: Sponsorship for education/training abroad by Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for Saudi nationals.
Table C: Average hours spent by doctors daily at work, doing housework and sleeping.
Table D: Household hours of work.
Table E: Perception amongst Saudi and non-Saudi doctors regarding gender equality between doctors who are of similar nationality, qualifications, professional level, competence, and years of experience at King Khalid University Hospital.
Table F: Perception amongst Saudi and non-Saudi doctors regarding support by their department and supervisors at King Khalid university hospital.
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by College of Medicine Research Center (CMRC), College of Medicine, King Saud University.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.World and its peoples. Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Yemen. Tarrytown, NY: Marshall Cavendish Group; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Saudi Arabia Population [Internet]. Dadax. 2017 [cited Mar 2017]. Available from: http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/saudi-arabia-population/.
- 3.Saudi Arabia-KSA population is 30.8m; 33% expats. Arab News. 2015.
- 4.World Economic Forum. The Global Gender Gap Report 2016. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Women constitute 13% of Saudi workforce: Stats Agency. Al Arabiya English. 2015 10 February 2015.
- 6.Nereim V, Abu-Nasr D. Saudi Women Are Joining the Workforce in Record Numbers [Internet]. BloombergMarkets; 2015. Available from: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-08-10/saudi-women-are-joining-the-workforce-in-record-numbers. [Google Scholar]
- 7.How Working Women Are Remaking Saudi Arabia [Internet]. Spiegel Online. 2015. Available from: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/more-saudi-arabia-women-working-despite-limited-rights-a-1040135.html.
- 8.Profanter A. Achievements and challenges in the educational realm in Saudi Arabia. ESJ. 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Smith L, Abouammoh A. Higher Education in Saudi Arabia: Achievements, Challenges and Opportunities.(Vol. 40). The Netherlands: Springer—Higher Education Dynamics; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 10.AJBAILI M. Saudi Arabia opens world's largest women's university Alarabiya news; [updated Sunday, 15 May 2011]. Available from: https://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2011/05/15/149218.html.
- 11.Women's rights in Saudi Arabia [Internet]. Wikkipedia; 2017 [updated 4 March 2017]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_rights_in_Saudi_Arabia.
- 12.Saudi Arabia [Internet]. UNESCO; 2017 [cited 2017 Mar 1]. Available from: en.unesco.org/countries/saudi-arabia.
- 13.Saudi Arabia-Statistics [Internet]. Unicef; 2013 [updated 27 December 2013]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/saudiarabia_statistics.html.
- 14.Hamel MB, Ingelfinger JR, Phimister E, Solomon CG. Women in academic medicine—progress and challenges. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(3):310–2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe068143 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hamdan A. Women and Education in Saudi Arabia: Challenges and Achievements. Int Edu J. 2005;6(1):42–64. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Althubaiti A, Alkhazim M. Medical Colleges in Saudi Arabia: Can We Predict Graduate Numbers? HES. 2014;4(3):1. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Graduates in University Colleges of Medicine and Health 2015/2016 Statistical Year Book 2015: Ministry of Health Portal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 2015. p. 123.
- 18.Al-Dabal BK. Choosing a medical career: what influences secondary school female graduates? J Family Community Med. 1998;5(2):53 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Saudi females prove their mettle in operation theaters 2016. Mar 26, 2016:[Available from: http://saudigazette.com.sa/saudi-arabia/saudi-females-prove-mettle-operation-theaters/.
- 20.Women in Medicine: Are We "There" Yet? [Internet]. Medscape. 2010. Available from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/732197.
- 21.Carr PL, Ash AS, Friedman RH, Szalacha L, Barnett RC, Palepu A, et al. Faculty perceptions of gender discrimination and sexual harassment in academic medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(11):889–96. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Weinberg DH, Levine C, Salmon L. Evidence from Census 2000 about earnings by detailed occupation for men and women: Census 2000 Special Reports: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau; 2004.
- 23.Tesch BJ, Wood HM, Helwig AL, Nattinger AB. Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine. Glass ceiling or sticky floor? JAMA. 1995;273(13):1022–5. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cropsey KL, Masho SW, Shiang R, Sikka V, Kornstein SG, Hampton CL. Why do faculty leave? Reasons for attrition of women and minority faculty from a medical school: four-year results. Journal of women's health. 2008;17(7):1111–8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gender disparities in physician income and advancement, (2008).
- 26.Monroe AK, Levine RB, Clark JM, Bickel J, MacDonald SM, Resar LM. Through a gender lens: a view of gender and leadership positions in a department of medicine. J Wom Health. 2015;24(10):837–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Connolly S, Holdcroft A. The pay gap for women in medicine and academic medicine. BMA Report: Women’s Medical Federation. 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Arrizabalaga P, Abellana R, Viñas O, Merino A, Ascaso C. Gender inequalities in the medical profession: are there still barriers to women physicians in the 21st century? Gaceta Sanitaria. 2014;28(5):363–8. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.03.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Santamaría A, Merino A, Viñas O, Arrizabalaga P. Does medicine still show an unresolved discrimination against women? Experience in two European university hospitals. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(2):104–6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ghouth D. Pitfalls of being a female doctor [Internet]. Saudi Gazette 2011. Available from: http://www.sauress.com/en/saudigazette/112778.
- 31.Ahmed Q. In the land of invisible women: A female doctor's journey in the Saudi Kingdom: Sourcebooks, Inc.; 2008.
- 32.Statistical Yearbook 1436—Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Ministry of Health Portal-Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 2015 [cited 2017 Mar 1, 2017]. Available from: http://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Statistics/Book/Pages/default.aspx.
- 33.Wikkipedia. Ministry of Civil Affairs [cited 2017 Sept 3]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Civil_Affairs.
- 34.Chai W. Saudi Arabia: A Modern Reader: University Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jena AB, Olenski AR, Blumenthal DM. Sex Differences in Physician Salary in US Public Medical Schools. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(9):1294–304. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3284 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5558151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Al-Tamimi DM. Saudi women in academic medicine. Are they succeeding? Saudi Med J. 2004;25(11):1564–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.King Khalid University Hospital & King Abdulaziz University Hospital Medical Staff Bylaws Sect. 9 (1410/2010).
- 38.Taylor C, Albasri W. The impact of Saudi Arabia King Abdullah’s scholarship program in the US. Open J Soc Sci. 2014;2(10):109. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Abdulrahman M Abouammoh, Larry R Smith, Duwais A-AM. A Review of Saudi Scholarship Programs to North American Higher Education Institutions. Int J Human Soc Sci. 2014;Vol. 4(11). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sharman J. Saudi Arabia to let women work and study without man's permission [Internet]. UK: Independent Digital News & Media; 2017. [updated May 6,]. Available from: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-male-guardianship-relax-women-work-study-gender-equality-a7721641.html. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Erikson C, Jones K, Whatley M. 2012. Physician Specialty Data Book. 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Freischlag JA. Women surgeons—still in a male-dominated world. Yale J Biol Med. 2008;81(4):203–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bruce AN, Battista A, Plankey MW, Johnson LB, Marshall MB. Perceptions of gender-based discrimination during surgical training and practice. Med Edu Online. 2015;20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jolly S, Griffith KA, DeCastro R, Stewart A, Ubel P, Jagsi R. Gender differences in time spent on parenting and domestic responsibilities by high-achieving young physician-researchers. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(5):344–53. doi: 10.7326/M13-0974 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4131769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Female Physician Compensation Report [Internet]. Medscape. 2016. Available from: http://www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/compensation/2016/female-physician.
- 46.Wang C, Sweetman A. Gender, family status and physician labour supply. Soc Sci Med. 2013;94:17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.018 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.McMurray JE, Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, Shugerman R, Nelson K. The work lives of women physicians results from the physician work life study. The SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(6):372–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2000.im9908009.x ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1495474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ghamdi TA. Balance between career and family life among female doctors in King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2014;3(2):203–11. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Robinson GE. Career satisfaction in female physicians. JAMA. 2004;291(5):635-. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.5.635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wallace JE. Gender and Supportive Co‐Worker Relations in the Medical Profession. Gender, Work & Org. 2014;21(1):1–17. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Saudis urge officials for the establishment of all-female hospitals [Internet]. Your Middle East. 2011. Available from: http://www.yourmiddleeast.com/columns/article/saudis-urge-officials-for-the-establishment-of-allfemale-hospitals_2257.
- 52.Segregation of the medical profession [Internet]. Saudi Gazette. 2016. Available from: http://saudigazette.com.sa/opinion/segregation-medical-profession/.
- 53.Al-Ghobain MO, Al-Drees TM, Alarifi MS, Al-Marzoug HM, Al-Humaid WA, Asiry AM. Patients' preferences for physicians' attire in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2012;33(7):763–7. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Al-Qahtani T, Al-Nawmasi W. Saudi patients desire regarding physician attire: cross-sectional hospital based study in Tabuk City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,. IJAR. 2016;4(10). [Google Scholar]
- 55.Male doctors to see female patients with a nurse present in Saudi Arabia [Internet]. Al arabia English. 2014. Available from: https://english.alarabiya.net/en/life-style/healthy-living/2017/02/12/7-ways-you-are-destroying-your-own-happiness-and-success.html.
- 56.Oberlin DT, Vo AX, Bachrach L, Flury SC. The Gender Divide: The Impact of Surgeon Gender on Surgical Practice Patterns in Urology. J Urol. 2016;196(5):1522–6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.030 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Fnais N, al-Nasser M, Zamakhshary M, Abuznadah W, Al Dhukair S, Saadeh M, et al. Prevalence of harassment and discrimination among residents in three training hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 2013;33(2):134 doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2013.134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Jones R, Perumalswami CR, Ubel P, Stewart A. Sexual Harassment and Discrimination Experiences of Academic Medical Faculty. JAMA. 2016;315(19):2120–1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2188 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Age at first marriage [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_age_at_first_marriage.
- 60.Zakaria R. The doctor brides [Internet]. Karachi: DAWN; 2013 [cited 2017 Aug 1, 2017]. Available from: https://www.dawn.com/news/1032070.
- 61.Meisenbach RJ. The female breadwinner: Phenomenological experience and gendered identity in work/family spaces. Sex Roles. 2010;62(1–2):2–19. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rajkhan S. Women in Saudi Arabia: Status, Rights, and limitations: University of Washington; Bothell; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Financial Rights of Women [Internet]. Islamweb.net. 2011. Available from: http://www.islamweb.net/en/article/168457/financial-rights-of-women.
- 64.Women to drive movement [Internet]. Wikipedia; [updated 4 March 2017; cited 2017 Aug 1]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_to_drive_movement.
- 65.Baeshen FS. How Economic Reform Will Help Women Drive In Saudi Arabia [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Sept 1]. Available from: http://time.com/4824171/women-drivers-saudi-arabia/.
- 66.Abu-Nasr D. Saudi Women Drivers Had a Long and Painful Journey. Bloomberg News. 2017. September 27, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Saudi Arabia elects up to 17 female councillors in historic election 2015 [cited 2017 Sept 1]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/13/saudi-arabia-elects-up-to-17-female-councillors-in-historic-election.
- 68.Saudi Arabia: State Schools to Allow Girls’ Sports [Internet]. Human Rights Watch; 2017. Available from: https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/07/13/saudi-arabia-state-schools-allow-girls-sports.
- 69.Importance of Education, Ministry of Education. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 2017 [cited 2017 Jul 11,]. Available from: https://www.moe.gov.sa/ar/news/Pages/edu-sport.aspx.
- 70.Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://english.alarabiya.net/en/…/04/…/Full-text-of-Saudi-Arabia-s-Vision-2030.html.
- 71.Cummings SM, Savitz LA, Konrad TR. Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. Health Serv Res. 2001;35(6):1347–55. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1089194. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table A. Personal Information regarding region of birth in Saudi Arabia, profession of spouse and mother and whether any gap in professional life.
Table B: Sponsorship for education/training abroad by Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for Saudi nationals.
Table C: Average hours spent by doctors daily at work, doing housework and sleeping.
Table D: Household hours of work.
Table E: Perception amongst Saudi and non-Saudi doctors regarding gender equality between doctors who are of similar nationality, qualifications, professional level, competence, and years of experience at King Khalid University Hospital.
Table F: Perception amongst Saudi and non-Saudi doctors regarding support by their department and supervisors at King Khalid university hospital.
(DOCX)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.