Abstract
Targeting of Toxoplasma gondii by autophagy is an effective mechanism by which host cells kill the protozoan. Thus, the parasite must avoid autophagic targeting to survive. Here we show that the mammalian cytoplasmic molecule Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) becomes activated during invasion of host cells. Activated FAK appears to accompany the formation of the moving junction (as assessed by expression the parasite protein RON4). FAK activation was inhibited by approaches that impaired β1 and β3 integrin signaling. FAK caused activation of Src that in turn mediated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) phosphorylation at the unique Y845 residue. Expression of Src-resistant Y845F EGFR mutant markedly inhibited ROP16-independent activation of STAT3 in host cells. Activation of FAK, Y845 EGFR or STAT3 prevented activation of PKR and eIF2α, key stimulators of autophagy. Genetic or pharmacologic inhibition of FAK, Src, EGFR phosphorylation at Y845, or STAT3 caused accumulation of the autophagy protein LC3 and LAMP-1 around the parasite and parasite killing dependent on autophagy proteins (ULK1 and Beclin 1) and lysosomal enzymes. Parasite killing was inhibited by expression of dominant negative PKR. Thus, T. gondii activates a FAK→Src→Y845-EGFR→STAT3 signaling axis within mammalian cells, thereby enabling the parasite to survive by avoiding autophagic targeting through a mechanism likely dependent on preventing activation of PKR and eIF2α.
Author summary
Toxoplasma gondii is a protozoan that resides within host cells. Avoiding lysosomal degradation including that mediated by autophagy is central to the ability of T. gondii to survive within these cells. We uncovered that during the process of active invasion of host cells, T. gondii activates in a broad range of mammalian cells a signaling cascade downstream of FAK-Src that prevents targeting of the intracellular parasite by autophagy enabling its survival. This pathway is different from the previously identified survival strategy dependent upon parasite micronemal proteins-mediated EGFR autophosphorylation and Akt activation. Importantly, preventing T. gondii-induced manipulation of host cell signaling led to parasite killing in host cells that were not activated by immune modulators. Pharmacologic approaches that impair parasite-induced activation of host cell signaling that counter-regulates autophagy may lead to novel treatment against toxoplasmosis.
Introduction
Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular protozoan that can cause disease in humans, including retinochoroiditis and encephalitis. T. gondii actively invades host cells, a process powered by the parasite’s own motility that is dependent on the sequential secretion of proteins present in the apical organelles called micronemes and rhoptries [1–3]. Micronemal proteins (MIC) act as adhesins that interact with the host cell membrane and also function through their association with the parasite glideosome that powers motility [2]. A complex of rhoptry neck proteins (RON) are secreted into the host cell membrane anchoring the parasite to the cell being invaded [1–3]. This complex contains RON2 that associates with the host cell membrane, plus RON4, RON5 and RON8 that are exposed to the host cell cytoplasm [1–3]. The complex forms a structure called moving or tight junction through which the parasite penetrates the host cell causing invagination of the host cell membrane [1–3]. Once invasion is completed, T. gondii dissociates from the host cell membrane and resides within a specialized niche called parasitophorous vacuole (PV).
T. gondii cannot withstand the lysosomal environment. The PV enables parasite survival since it is devoid of proteins required for fusion with endosomes and lysosomes [4]. However, in addition to the classical endosomal-lysosomal pathway, macroautophagy (commonly referred as autophagy) is an important constitutive mechanism that targets organelles and portions of cytoplasm to lysosomal degradation [5]. This indicates that T. gondii must avoid autophagic targeting as a survival mechanism within host cells.
Autophagy is characterized by the recruitment of Atg proteins to the isolation membrane that encircles a portion of the cell leading to the formation of an autophagosome [5]. The process is driven by the activation of the Unc-51-like kinase 1/2 (ULK1/2) complex and Beclin 1 –Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 3 (PI3KC3) complex, and is inhibited by activation of the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) [6–8]. We previously demonstrated that T. gondii induces autophosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in host cells, a process mediated by MIC3 and MIC6, parasite proteins with EGF-like domains [9]. EGFR autophosphorylation is followed by activation of Akt (a molecule known to inhibit autophagy by activating mTORC1 [10]) and inhibition of targeting of the PV by autophagosomes [9]. However, autophagy is regulated at various levels by an array of signaling molecules. The efficiency by which T. gondii avoids autophagic targeting raised the possibility that the parasite acts at more than one level to successfully impair autophagic killing. Herein, we report that during the process of invasion by T. gondii, the mammalian cytoplasmic molecule Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) became activated at a site that appears to associate with RON4 (host cell-parasite junction). FAK activation led to activation of Src and its transactivation of EGFR that, instead of inducing Akt activation, triggered Y705 phosphorylation and activation of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (STAT3). In turn, STAT3 signaling prevented autophagic killing of the parasite likely by averting activation of Protein Kinase Double-stranded RNA-dependent (PKR) and its downstream effector Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2α (eIF2α). Blockade of the FAK→Src→Y845-EGFR→STAT3 signaling cascade led to parasite killing in host cells that were not activated by immune modulators.
Results
T. gondii induces Src activation in mammalian cells
Src constitutes a signaling node that regulates multiple cellular processes [11]. Src activity is regulated by phosphorylation of tyrosine residues. Phosphorylation at Y416 in the activation loop in the kinase domain locks the catalytic domain into a fully active conformation resulting in high kinase activity [12]. Incubation of human retinal pigment epithelial cells (RPE) with tachyzoites of the RH strain of T. gondii (type I strain) resulted in an increased phosphorylation of Src at Y416 (Fig 1A). Similar results were observed in human lung epithelial cells (A549) and mouse endothelial cells (mHEVc) (Fig 1A). T. gondii enhanced Y416 Src phosphorylation not only in non-hematopoietic cells but also in a mouse microglia cell line (BV-2) (Fig 1B). In addition, increased Y416 phosphorylation was detected in cells infected with tachyzoites of the ME49 (type II strain) or VAND (atypical) strain (Fig 1C). Subsequent experiments were conducted using a type I strain (RH) unless otherwise stated. Taken together, different strains of T. gondii induce rapid activation of Src in various hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cells.
Formation of the moving junction during invasion of host cells appears to associate with FAK activation that triggers Src signaling
T. gondii activates EGFR in mammalian cells [9] and EGFR signaling can activate Src [13]. However, T. gondii infection of CHO cells (EGFR null) still triggered Y416 Src phosphorylation, indicating that parasite-induced Src activation can occur independently of EGFR (S1A Fig). T. gondii is reported to induce G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), TLR2 and TLR4 signaling [14, 15], molecules that signal through Src [16–18]. However, while treatment of A549 cells with pertussis toxin (PTx, an inhibitor of GPCR signaling) markedly impairs Akt phosphorylation induced by Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA, a ligand for GCPR), PTx did not inhibit parasite-induced phosphorylation of Src Y416 (S1B Fig). Similarly, knockdown of MyD88 (adaptor protein that mediates TLR2/4 signaling) in A549 cells did not inhibit parasite-induced phosphorylation of Src Y416 or affect the ability of tachyzoites to infect mammalian cells (S1C Fig).
The parasite kinases, rhoptry protein 16 (ROP16) and ROP18, are delivered into the host cells and induce tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3/6 and threonine phosphorylation of Immunity Related GTPases (IRG), respectively in infected mammalian cells [19–22]. To examine the potential role of these proteins in Src activation, A549 cells were infected with tachyzoites deficient in these proteins (Δrop16 or Δrop18) or their WT controls. Infection with Δrop16 or Δrop18 tachyzoites did not diminish Src Y416 phosphorylation (S1D Fig). Altogether, T. gondii can trigger phosphorylation of Src Y416 independently of EGFR, GPCR and TLR signaling as well as independently of ROP16 and ROP18.
FAK is a widely expressed cytoplasmic non-receptor tyrosine kinase that activates Src [23]. Y397 is the major autophosphorylation site of FAK that correlates with increased catalytic activity and creates a high-affinity binding site for the SH2 domain of Src [24–26]. We examined whether T. gondii causes FAK phosphorylation at Y397 and whether FAK mediates parasite-induced Src activation. T. gondii induced rapid phosphorylation of Y397 in FAK in RPE, A549, mHEVc and CHO cells (Fig 2A–2F). The experiments with CHO cells indicate that, similar to Src, T. gondii can activate FAK in the absence of EGFR (Fig 2B). Next, we used tetracycline-induced conditional micronemal protein 8 knockout parasites (MIC8KOi) to determine whether host cell invasion is required for phosphorylation of Y397. Incubation with aminotetracycline (ATc) led to the phenotype of MIC8 deficiency—parasites with markedly impaired ability to infect host cells [27] (A549 cells; no ATC: 28.3 ± 4.3% and 30.3 ± 5% of infected cells at 2 and 18 hr respectively; ATc: 3.3 ± 0.5% and 3.6 ± 0.6% at 2 and 18 hr respectively). In contrast to MIC8-sufficient parasites, tachyzoites deficient in MIC8 failed to induce phosphorylation of FAK Y397 (Fig 2C). FAK bridges extracellular stimuli with Src signaling. Thus, we examined if phosphorylation of FAK occurred at the site of parasite-host cell interaction. CHO cells were challenged with T. gondii-YFP followed by staining with Abs against anti-phospho-Y397 FAK and RON4, a central component of the moving junction. This structure manifests initially as a cap around the apical tip of the tachyzoite and subsequently, as a ring around the invading parasite. During early stages of parasite invasion, enhanced activation of FAK (i.e., increased Y397 phosphorylation) appeared to associate with RON4 around the apical pole of parasites although the overlap may not be complete (Fig 2D, early phase). Increased phospho-Y397 FAK expression also co-localized with ring structures that expressed RON4 (Fig 2D, mid phase). Finally, increased expression of phospho-Y397 FAK was also noted around parasites that had completed invasion (Fig 2D, intracellular). Altogether, our findings indicate that T. gondii induces FAK activation during the process of invasion of host cells.
A549 cells were treated with vehicle or FAK inhibitor (PF-573228), followed by challenge with T. gondii to test whether FAK mediates T. gondii-induced Src activation. The FAK inhibitor markedly impaired parasite-induced phosphorylation of Src Y416 (Fig 2E). This occurred despite the fact that the FAK inhibitor did not impair the ability of tachyzoites to infect cells. Similarly, knockdown of FAK markedly reduced Y416 phosphorylation of Src in mHEVc cells challenged with T. gondii (Fig 2F). Thus, infection with T. gondii causes Y397 phosphorylation of FAK that appears to associate with RON4, a component of the moving junction. In turn, FAK mediates parasite-induced Src activation.
Inhibition of β integrin signaling prevents T. gondii-induced FAK activation
Integrin clustering causes recruitment of FAK to the intracytoplasmic tail of integrins leading to FAK autophosphorylation at Y397 and FAK activation [25, 28]. We took 3 approaches to examine the role of β integrins in T. gondii-induced FAK activation. First, we incubated mammalian cells with cRGDfV, a peptide that binds αvβ integrins inhibiting their interaction to ligands [29]. cRADfV peptide was used as control. As shown in Fig 3A, cRGDfV peptide markedly diminished Y397 phosphorylation of FAK in RPE cells challenged with T. gondii. Next, we examined the effects of knockdown of β1 integrin or of treatment with a neutralizing anti-αvβ3 Ab. We used MDA-MB-231 cells transduced with lentiviral vector encoding shRNA against β1 integrin (proven to be deficient in β1 integrin expression [30]) and MB-MB-231 cells transduced with a lentiviral vector encoding control shRNA. MDA-MB-231 cells deficient in β1 integrin exhibited reduced FAK Y397 phosphorylation after T. gondii infection (Fig 3B). Incubation with a neutralizing anti-αvβ3 Ab decreased parasite-induced FAK Y397 phosphorylation both in cells sufficient and deficient in β1 integrin (Fig 3B). None of the approaches to inhibit β integrin signaling impaired the initial percentage of infected cells (see S2C and S2D Fig). Thus, FAK activation triggered by T. gondii infection appears to be dependent on β1 and β3 integrins.
T. gondii-induced β integrin-FAK-Src signaling prevents autophagic killing of T. gondii
We examined whether T. gondii activates Src and FAK signaling in order to survive within mammalian cells. RPE, mHEVc and BV-2 cells were incubated with vehicle or PP2, a Src kinase inhibitor, followed by challenge with T. gondii. While PP2 did not impair the initial percentage of infected cells, PP2 significantly reduced the percentage of infected cells at 24 h, the number of tachyzoites per 100 cells and the numbers of T. gondii-containing vacuoles per 100 cells at 24 h (S2A Fig). Similar results were observed after knockdown of Src (Fig 4A). The T. gondii-containing vacuoles that persisted after Src knockdown had similar numbers of parasites as those from control siRNA-expressing cells indicating that the effect of Src knockdown was to induce parasite killing rather than restrict parasite replication (Fig 4A). Knockdown of FAK in mHEVc cells not only induced killing of RH T. gondii but also of the VAND strain of the parasite (S2B Fig). Similarly, incubation of RPE with cRGDfV peptide, knockdown of β1 integrin in MDA-MB-231 cells or incubation of these cells with a neutralizing anti-αvβ3 Ab decreased the percentages of infected cells at 24 h and the numbers of parasites per 100 host cells (S2C and S2D Fig). Taken together, these findings revealed that parasite-induced β integrin→FAK→Src signaling prevents killing of T. gondii within host cells.
We examined whether parasite killing after blockade of Src and its upstream inducers is dependent on autophagy. The distribution of LC3, a protein associated with autophagosome membrane, was examined in T. gondii-infected cells rendered deficient in Src. A549 cells transfected with either control siRNA or Src siRNA followed by challenge with T. gondii and immunofluorescence using an anti-LC3 Ab. Knockdown of Src resulted in a significant accumulation of LC3 (ring) around the parasite (Fig 4B). Moreover, Src knockdown caused accumulation of the late endosomal/lysosomal marker LAMP-1 around T. gondii (Fig 4C). At later times post-infection (12 h), tachyzoites encircled by LAMP-1 exhibited morphology that suggested they were undergoing degradation (Fig 4C). To investigate whether T. gondii killing during blockade of Src is dependent on the autophagy machinery, we first examined the effects of knockdown of ULK1 and Beclin 1. ULK1 and the Beclin 1-PI3KC3 complex promote autophagosome formation and maturation [5]. Moreover, ULK1 is key for the stimulation of canonical autophagy in mammalian cells [6–8]. Knockdown of ULK1 or Beclin 1 prevented induction of anti-T. gondii activity in mammalian cells incubated with PP2 or transfected with Src siRNA (Fig 4D and 4E). We examined the effects of the lysosomal protease inhibitors leupeptin and pepstatin since autophagosomes deliver their cargo to lysosomes for degradation. Treatment with lysosomal inhibitors also ablated anti-T. gondii activity in Src deficient cells (Fig 4F). Similarly, anti-T. gondii activity induced in cells transduced with FAK shRNA-encoding lentiviral vector was ablated by knockdown of ULK1 or Beclin 1 (Fig 4G and 4H). Finally, lysosomal inhibitors prevented anti-T. gondii activity induced by cRGDfV peptide (Fig 4I). Thus, engagement of the β integrin→FAK→Src pathway is critical to promote parasite survival since it prevented T. gondii killing dependent on the autophagy machinery and lysosomal protease activity.
Src signaling induced by T. gondii triggers trans-activation of EGFR that is required to prevent parasite killing within host cells
Src interacts with growth factor receptors including EGFR, a surface molecule engaged by T. gondii during host cell invasion [9]. The parasite adhesins MIC3 and MIC6 contain EGF-like domains and cause EGFR signaling that activates Akt and impairs autophagic targeting of the parasitophorous vacuole [9]. Src binds EGFR and transactivates this receptor by causing EGFR phosphorylation at a unique Y845 residue leading to signaling via alternate pathways downstream of EGFR [31–34]. We examined whether T. gondii induces EGFR phosphorylation at Y845. A549 cells expressing either control siRNA or Src siRNA were challenged with T. gondii. T. gondii induced EGFR Y845 phosphorylation, an effect that was ablated by knockdown of Src (Fig 5A). Next, we examined the relevance of parasite-induced Y845 EGFR phosphorylation. EGFR with dialanine substitution of L679 and L680 (EGFR AA) is defective in Src-induced Y845 phosphorylation [35]. NMuMG epithelial cells with stable expression of human WT EGFR or EGFR AA were infected with T. gondii. A significant reduction in the percentages of infected cells and the numbers of parasites per 100 cells at 24 h was detected in cells expressing EGFR AA (Fig 5B). To further explore the importance of Y845 EGFR phosphorylation, A549 cells were transfected with a plasmid encoding either WT EGFR or a phenylalanine substitution of Y845 (Y845F EGFR) [31, 32] followed by challenge with RH T. gondii. Y845F mutant EGFR does not signal through Y845 phosphorylation but retains full EGFR kinase activity [31, 32]. Cells transfected with Y845F-EGFR plasmid exhibited a significant decrease in the percentages of infected cells, the numbers of tachyzoites and vacuoles per 100 cells without affecting the number of tachyzoite per vacuole (Fig 5C). These findings indicate that preventing Y845 EGFR phosphorylation results in killing of T. gondii rather than reduction in intracellular replication of the parasite. Taken together, T. gondii-induced Src signaling causes EGFR transactivation that in turn prevents parasite killing.
Src-mediated EGFR transactivation is not required for Akt activation triggered by T. gondii but mediates ROP16-independent STAT3 activation
Direct ligation of EGFR by MIC3 and MIC6 causes activation of Akt that prevents autophagic targeting of the parasite [9]. However, inhibition of FAK or Src knockdown did not significantly diminish the rapid S473 Akt phosphorylation induced by T. gondii infection of host cells (Fig 6A). Phosphorylation of the Y845 residue of EGFR activates signaling cascades including STAT3 [34]. Thus, we examined whether Src and EGFR Y845 mediate rapid STAT3 activation in T. gondii-infected cells. T. gondii is reported to induce Y705-STAT3 phosphorylation in macrophages, fibroblasts and 293T cells [20, 36–38]. Fig 6B–6G shows that tachyzoites of the RH or ME49 strains of T. gondii caused rapid Y705 STAT3 phosphorylation in RPE, A549, mHEVc, BV-2 and NMuMG cells.
The parasite kinase ROP16 is injected into the host cell cytoplasm, rapidly migrates to the nucleus and causes STAT3 activation. However, while ROP16 is reported to induce Y705 STAT3 phosphorylation as early 1.5 h post infection in macrophages, ROP16 did not appear to mediate STAT3 phosphorylation at earlier time points after infection in these cells [38]. To confirm these findings, we infected A549 epithelial cells with WT parasites or Δrop16 T. gondii. A549 cells infected with both types of parasites exhibited similar levels of Y705 STAT3 phosphorylation at the early time points post infection (Fig 6D). Lower STAT3 phosphorylation was noted at 1 h post-infection with Δrop16 T. gondii (Fig 6D). Next, we examined the role of Src and EGFR transactivation in STAT3 activation induced by T. gondii infection. Epithelial cells expressing either Src siRNA or control siRNA were challenged with T. gondii. Knockdown of Src diminished the early Y705 STAT3 phosphorylation induced by the parasite (Fig 6E). In addition, the presence of EGFR in CHO cells markedly enhanced T. gondii-induced early Y705 STAT3 phosphorylation (S3A Fig). To examine whether EGFR Y845 phosphorylation promotes STAT3 activation triggered by T. gondii, human epithelial cells were transfected with a plasmid encoding WT EGFR or Y845F EGFR. Transfection with the Y845F EGFR plasmid markedly inhibited T. gondii-induced early Y705 STAT3 phosphorylation (Fig 6F). Finally, NMuMG epithelial cells that express EGFR AA (defective in Src-induced Y845 phosphorylation) exhibited reduced Y705 STAT3 phosphorylation after challenge with WT or Δrop16 T. gondii (Fig 6G). Taken together, T. gondii-induced Y845 EGFR signaling mediates ROP16-independent STAT3 activation.
T. gondii-induced STAT3 signaling prevents autophagic killing of the parasite
STAT3 can inhibit autophagy [39, 40]. Thus, we examined whether blockade of STAT3 triggered autophagy-dependent killing of T. gondii. Human epithelial cells were transfected with STAT3 siRNA or control siRNA followed by incubation with T. gondii tachyzoites. Knockdown of STAT3 resulted in a significant reduction in the percentages of infected cells, the numbers of tachyzoites and parasite-containing vacuoles per 100 cells at 24 h (Fig 7A). Knockdown of STAT3 resulted in a significant accumulation of LC3 and LAMP-1 around the parasite (Fig 7B and 7C). Moreover, silencing of Beclin 1 prevented induction of anti-T. gondii activity in cells subjected to STAT3 knockdown (Fig 7D). Next, we examined the role of phosphorylation of Y705 in parasite survival. Transfection of mouse endothelial cells with the non-phosphorylatable mutant Y705F STAT3 caused accumulation of LC3 around the parasite (Fig 7E). Expression of Y705F STAT3 in endothelial (Fig 7F) or epithelial cells (S4 Fig) resulted in a reduction in the percentage of infected cells and the numbers of tachyzoites per 100 cells at 24 h. Parasite killing was dependent on lysosomal enzymes since it was markedly inhibited by leupeptin/pepstatin (Fig 7F; S4 Fig). Thus, parasite-induced STAT3 signaling prevents T. gondii killing dependent on the autophagy machinery and lysosomal protease activity.
T. gondii-induced FAK/Src/EGFR-induced STAT3 signaling prevents killing of T. gondii likely by preventing PKR and eIF2α activation
S51 phosphorylation of eIF2α plays an important role in the stimulation of autophagy [41]. In addition, increased S51 phosphorylation of eIF2α accompanies autophagic killing of T. gondii induced by CD40 ligation [42]. Thus, we examined the effect FAK—Y845 EGFR—STAT3 signaling on activation of eIF2α. While infection with T. gondii did not significantly increase S51 phosphorylation of eIF2α in FAK-sufficient cells, knockdown of FAK increased eIF2α phosphorylation in cells infected with T. gondii (Fig 8A). Similarly, expression of the EGFR AA mutant (defective in Y845 phosphorylation) or transfection with Y705F-STAT3 resulted in increased S51 eIF2α phosphorylation in T. gondii-infected cells (Fig 8B and 8C). In addition, T. gondii induced marked eIF2α phosphorylation in EGFR-null CHO cells but not in EGFR+ CHO cells (S3B Fig). Next, we examined PKR signaling since this molecule is a major activator of eIF2α and autophagy, PKR links CD40 to autophagic killing of T. gondii and PKR is targeted by STAT3 to inhibit autophagy [40–43]. Knockdown of FAK or expression of EGFR AA increased T451 phosphorylation of PKR in cells infected with T. gondii (Fig 8D). Moreover, transfection with DN PKR impaired S51 eIF2α phosphorylation in T. gondii-infected cells that are deficient in FAK (Fig 8E). Finally, we examined whether killing of T. gondii required PKR signaling. The accumulation of LC3 around the parasite observed after inhibition of Src was ablated by transfection of DN PKR (Fig 8F). Moreover, expression of DN PKR also prevented parasite killing induced by inhibition of Src (Fig 8G). Taken together, these results suggest that T. gondii avoids autophagic killing by inducing cell signaling in host cells that prevents PKR and eIF2α activation.
Discussion
Intracellular survival of T. gondii requires that the parasite avoids being targeted by autophagy, a process that would otherwise lead to lysosomal killing of the parasite. Herein we identified a pathway by which T. gondii prevents autophagic targeting (Fig 9). We report that during the process of invasion of mammalian cells, T. gondii induced expression of phospho Y397 FAK that appeared to associate in the host cell with RON4, a parasite protein expressed in the moving junction. In turn, FAK triggered Src activation and Src-mediated EGFR transactivation resulting in STAT3 signaling. FAK—Src—Y845 EGFR—STAT3 signaling induced by T. gondii was relevant because it prevented targeting of the parasite by the autophagy machinery. Inhibition of the components of this cascade in a broad range of resting host cells resulted in accumulation of LC3 and LAMP-1 around the PV and parasite killing that was dependent on ULK1, Beclin 1 and lysosomal protease activity. Moreover, inhibition of parasite-induced cell signaling enhanced phosphorylation of PKR and eIF2α. These events were relevant since the killing of T. gondii was ablated by expression of DN PKR. Taken together, these findings identified molecular events set in motion during the process of active invasion of host cells that enable T. gondii to restrict activation of PKR and eIF2α, molecules that are key drivers of autophagy.
FAK is a cytoplasmic molecule that responds to extracellular signals and regulates cell motility, survival and proliferation [44]. These effects are mediated by its function as a scaffold protein that interacts and phosphorylates other signaling molecules. Our studies indicate that invasion of mammalian cells by T. gondii caused activation of FAK and its interacting partner Src. EGFR was not required for activation of these signaling molecules. FAK can become activated by mechanical stimulation and integrin clustering [45]. The studies with the cRGDfV peptide, neutralizing anti-αvβ3 Ab and knockdown of β1 integrin suggest that FAK signaling induced by T. gondii infection is driven to a large extent by β integrins, presumably in the form of mechano-transduction-induced integrin clustering at the site of host cell penetration causing activation of mammalian cytoplasmic FAK. While host cell invasion is driven by the T. gondii glideosome, the host cell also contributes to this process by forming an F-actin ring underneath the moving junction and accumulating microtubules at this site that would anchor the moving junction to the host cell cytoskeleton during invasion [46–48]. The studies presented herein revealed that the process of invasion not only induces rearrangement of host cell cytoskeleton but triggers FAK-Src signaling that plays a critical role in promoting parasite survival.
Src regulates various cellular processes through interactions with signaling proteins including EGFR. Indeed, binding of Src to EGFR can trigger EGFR signaling even in the absence of ligand binding [49]. While binding of EGF to EGFR induces autophosphorylation at tyrosine sites in the C-terminal non-catalytic domain of the receptor that act as docking sites for various signaling molecules, Src transactivation of EGFR is characterized by phosphorylation at a unique Y845 site located in the kinase domain of EGFR that leads to activation of alternate signaling molecules [31–34]. We reported that, through the effect of MIC3 and MIC6 (adhesins with EGF-like domains), T. gondii induces EGFR autophosphorylation and Akt activation that prevents autophagic targeting of the PV [9]. In contrast, Src-dependent Y845 phosphorylation of EGFR was critical for parasite-induced STAT3 activation but played no significant role in T. gondii-induced early Akt signaling. These results differ from those reported in cells exposed to HIV Tat or cells infected with Salmonella typhimurium, where both HIV Tat-induced Src activation and bacterial-induced FAK activation signal through Akt to inhibit autophagy [39, 50]. Our studies support the existence of 2 pathways by which T. gondii impairs autophagic targeting, FAK→Src→Y845-EGFR→STAT3 and MIC3/6→EGFR autophosphorylation→Akt.
Our studies indicate that T. gondii induces rapid STAT3 Y705 phosphorylation dependent on FAK—Src and Y845 EGFR phosphorylation. Knockdown of STAT3 and expression of Y705F STAT3 revealed that T. gondii activates STAT3 to prevent autophagic killing. While phosphorylated STAT3 is a well-recognized transcriptional regulator, STAT3 can also signal in the cytoplasm. Phosphorylated STAT3 crosstalks with signaling molecules in the cytoplasm and has been proposed to modulate signaling at this level [51–53]. We report that in T. gondii-infected cells, expression of Y705F STAT3 or inhibition of upstream inducers of STAT3 Y705 phosphorylation resulted in increased phosphorylation of PKR and/or eIF2α. Moreover, the studies using DN PKR indicate that targeting by LC3 and parasite killing triggered by inhibition of host cell signaling was dependent on PKR. STAT3 can inhibit autophagy through constitutive binding to PKR that prevents PKR activation, an effect that does not require STAT3 phosphorylation at Y705 [40]. Our studies suggest an additional mechanism by which STAT3 Y705 phosphorylation induced by T. gondii impairs PKR-eIF2α signaling. STAT3 is also reported to inhibit autophagy through increased transcription of negative regulators of autophagy [54]. Moreover, S727 phosphorylation of STAT3 promotes its mitochondrial localization and is reported to increase autophagy [55]. Altogether, STAT3 appears to regulate autophagy through various mechanisms, the nature of which may be determined in a context-dependent manner.
After being injected into the host cell during invasion, the T. gondii protein ROP16 migrates to the nucleus of the host cell and induces STAT3/6 activation that in turn impairs expression of IL-12, a cytokine that confers host protection against T. gondii [37, 38]. However, the effect of ROP16 on STAT3 phosphorylation is not noticeable until after 1–1.5 hr post-infection ([38] and this study) and the parasite induces STAT3 activation as early as 2 min post-infection [36]. The work herein identified FAK—Src—EGFR Y845 phosphorylation as a novel upstream inducer of STAT3 activation during T. gondii infection. It appears that this pathway rather than the ROP16 –STAT3 pathway is a major inhibitor of autophagic targeting of T. gondii. Taken together, T. gondii has evolved distinct mechanisms to activate STAT3 and through them sets in motion processes that impair the autophagic killing of the parasite and Th1 immunity.
Our studies identified a molecular cascade that appears to be associated with the formation of the moving junction during parasite invasion that leads to activation of STAT3 preventing targeting of the parasite by the autophagy machinery. Moreover, these studies suggest that parasite-induced STAT3 signaling functions by preventing activation of PKR and eIF2α. The demonstration that immune (CD40)-mediated induction of autophagic killing of T. gondii is dependent on activation of PKR [42] suggests that the intracellular survival of T. gondii may be affected by opposing effects of the parasite and cell mediated immunity on key components of autophagy signaling. Given that autophagy promotes in vivo protection against T. gondii [42, 56], pharmacologic approaches to prevent the parasite from activating host cell signaling that counter-regulates autophagy may result in novel treatment against toxoplasmosis.
Materials and methods
Mammalian cells
Human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells (ARPE-19), human lung epithelial cells (A549) (both from American Type Culture Collection, ATCC, Manassas, VA), mouse high endothelial venule cells (mHEVc, gift from Joan Cook-Mills, Northwestern University), mouse microglia cell line (BV-2, gift from Kalipada Pahan, University of Nebraska), MDA-MB-231 human breast epithelial cells (ATCC) [30] and normal mouse mammary gland (NMuMG) epithelial cells (ATCC) [35] were cultured in either RPMI or DMEM plus 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone, Logan, UT). NMuMG with stable expression of human WT EGFR or mutant EGFR where 679,680-LL was converted to AA (EGFR AA) were previously described [35]. Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO; gift from Cathleen Carlin, Case Western Reserve University) cells were cultured in MEM plus 10% FBS.
T. gondii and infection
Tachyzoites of the T. gondii strains RH (Type I strain), RH-YFP, RH-RFP, RH ROP16 knockout (Δrop16 [19]), RH ROP18 knockout (Δrop18), their corresponding WT controls, (gifts from John Boothroyd, Stanford University, Stanford, CA), inducible conditional MIC8 knockout (MIC8KOi) (gift from Markus Meissner, University of Glasgow), ME49 (Type II strain) or VAND (atypical strain, BEI Resources, Manassas, VA) were maintained in human foreskin fibroblasts (ATCC). MIC8KOi parasites were cultured in HFF in the presence of anhydrotetracycline (1 μg/ml) for 48 h to deplete MIC8. T. gondii infection was synchronized using potassium buffer shift. Mammalian cells were incubated with the Src inhibitor PP2 (0.2 μM; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), FAK inhibitor PF-573228 (1 μM; Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY; both 1 h prior to challenge with T. gondii), integrin blocking peptide cRGDfV or control peptide cRADfV (3 μM; Bachem, Torrance, CA; 1 h prior to challenge), neutralizing anti-αvβ3 mAb LM609 (15 μg/ml; EMD Millipore, Temecula, CA; 1 h prior to challenge), pertussis toxin (PTx; 100 ng/ml; EMD Millipore; 4 h prior to challenge), lysosomal inhibitors leupeptin and pepstatin (both 10 μM; EMD Millipore; 1 h after challenge with T. gondii). Parasite load was assessed as described [9]. In certain experiments cells were incubated with lysophosphatidic acid (LPA; 10 μM; Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO). None of the reagents described above affected cell viability (trypan blue exclusion).
Transfections and lentiviral vectors
Cells were transfected with Src siRNA [57], ULK1 siRNA (Life Technologies), Beclin 1 siRNA [58], STAT3 siRNA [59], MyD88 siRNA [60] or control siRNA (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO) as well as plasmids encoding WT EGFR, Y845F EGFR [32], WT STAT3, Y705 STAT3 (gift from Jim Darnell; Addgene plasmids # 8707 and 8709) [61], FLAG-tagged WT-PKR, dominant negative (DN)-PKR (K296R) or empty plasmid (gifts from Bill Sugden, University of Wisconsin) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) following manufacturer’s instructions. mHEVc cells were transduced with lentivirus vectors encoding FAK or control shRNA (Open Biosystems, Lafayette, CO) followed by selection with puromycin (10 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich). MDA-MB-231 cells transduced with lentiviral vectors encoding shRNA against β1 integrin or control shRNA were previously described [30].
Fluorescence microscopy
Mammalian cells challenged with RFP T. gondii were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 5 h and stained with rabbit anti-LC3 antibody (MBL International, Woburn, MA) plus Alexa 488-conjugated secondary antibody (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Mammalian cells infected with YFP T. gondii were fixed at 8 h and stained with mouse anti-human LAMP-1 mAb (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank; Iowa City, IA) plus Alexa 555-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc.). Accumulation of LC3 or LAMP-1 around T. gondii was defined as the presence of a ring-like structure that surrounds the parasite [62, 63]. At least 50 cells per well (duplicate or triplicate wells per group per experiment) were counted manually. CHO cells were challenged with YFP T. gondii and fixed at 3 min. Monolayers were stained with mouse anti-phospho-Y397 FAK antibody (BD Biosciences) plus Alexa 555-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc.) and rabbit anti-RON4 antibody (gift from John Boothroyd) followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit Alexa 647-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc.). Specificity of staining was determined by incubating monolayers with secondary antibody alone. Slides were analyzed using Leica DMI 6000 B automated microscope equipped for epifluorescence microscopy.
Immunoblot
Membranes were probed with antibodies against Src, phospho-Y416 Src (all from Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), EGFR (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), phospho-Y845 EGFR (Cell Signaling), FAK (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), phospho-Y397 FAK (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), STAT3 (Cell Signaling), phospho-Y705 STAT3 (Cell Signaling), eIF2α (Cell Signaling), phospho-S51 eIF2α (Cell Signaling), PKR (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), phospho-T451 PKR (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), Beclin 1 (BD Biosciences), ULK1 (Sigma-Aldrich), MyD88 (Cell Signaling) or actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Intensities of phosphorylated and total proteins were calculated using ImageJ (NIH). Phospho-protein signal was normalized to total protein signal, before normalizing it relative to the control or 0 min time-point condition.
Statistics
Results from pooled experiments were analyzed for statistical significance using 2-tailed Student’s t test and ANOVA. Differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank Scott Howell and Anthony Gardella (Case Western Reserve University) for image collection.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The study was financed by grants from the National Institutes of Health (www.nih.org) EY018341 to CSS, REY018341B to YLC, and T32 AI089474 to LMF. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Bradley PJ, Sibley LD. Rhoptries: an arsenal of secreted virulence factors. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007;10:582–7. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2007.09.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Santos JM, Soldati-Favre D. Invasion factors are coupled to key signalling events leading to the establishment of infection in apicomplexan parasites. Cell Microbiol. 2011;13:787–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01585.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Besteiro S, Dubremetz JF, Lebrun M. The moving junction of apicomplexan parasites: a key structure for invasion. Cell Microbiol. 2011;13:797–805. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01597.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mordue DG, Sibley LD. Intracellular fate of vacuoles containing Toxoplasma gondii is determined at the time of formation and depends on the mechanisms of entry. J Immunol. 1997;159:4452–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Ohsumi Y. The role of Atg proteins in autophagosome formation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2010;27:107–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Itakura E, Mizushima N. Characterization of autophagosome formation site by a hierarchical analysis of mammalian Atg proteins. Autophagy. 2010;6:764–76. doi: 10.4161/auto.6.6.12709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chan EY, Longatti A, McKnight NC, Tooze SA. Kinase-inactivated ULK proteins inhibit autophagy via their conserved C-terminal domains using an Atg13-independent mechanism. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:157–71. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01082-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Russell RC, Tian Y, Yuan H, Park HW, Chang YY, Kim J, et al. ULK1 induces autophagy by phosphorylating Beclin-1 and activating VPS34 lipid kinase. Nature Cell Biol. 2013;15:741–50. doi: 10.1038/ncb2757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Muniz-Feliciano L, Van Grol J, Portillo J-AC, Liew L, Liu B, Carlin CR, et al. Toxoplasma gondii-induced activation of EGFR prevents autophagy protein-mediated killing of the parasite. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003809 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Menon S, Dibble CC, Talbott G, Hoxhaj G, Valvezan AJ, Takahashi H, et al. Spatial control of the TSC complex integrates insulin and nutrient regulation of mTORC1 at the lysosome. Cell. 2014;156:771–85. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yeatman TJ. A renaissance for SRC. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(6):470–80. doi: 10.1038/nrc1366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Roskoski R Jr. Src kinase regulation by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Biochem Biophys Res Com. 2005;331:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leu TH, Maa MC. Functional implication of the interaction between EGF receptor and c-Src. Front Biosci. 2003;8:s28–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Debierre-Grockiego F, Campos MA, Azzouz N, Schmidt J, Bieker U, Resende MG, et al. Activation of TLR2 and TLR4 by glycosylphosphatidylinositols derived from Toxoplasma gondii. J Immunol. 2007;179:1129–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Aliberti J, Valenzuela JG, Carruthers VB, Hieny S, Andersen J, Charest H, et al. Molecular mimicry of a CCR5 binding-domain in the microbial activation of dendritic cells. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:485–90. doi: 10.1038/ni915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chun J, Prince A. Activation of Ca2+-dependent signaling by TLR2. J Immunol. 2006;177(2):1330–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gong P, Angelini DJ, Yang S, Xia G, Cross AS, Mann D, et al. TLR4 signaling is coupled to SRC family kinase activation, tyrosine phosphorylation of zonula adherens proteins, and opening of the paracellular pathway in human lung microvascular endothelia. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:13437–49. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M707986200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.McGarrigle D, Huang XY. GPCRs signaling directly through Src-family kinases. Sci STKE. 2007;2007(392):pe35 doi: 10.1126/stke.3922007pe35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ong YC, Reese ML, Boothroyd JC. Toxoplasma rhoptry protein 16 (ROP16) subverts host function by direct tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT6. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:28731–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.112359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yamamoto M, Standley DM, Takashima S, Saiga H, Okuyama M, Kayama H, et al. A single polymorphic amino acid on Toxoplasma gondii kinase ROP16 determines the direct and strain-specific activation of Stat3. J Exp Med. 2009;206:2747–60. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fentress SJ, Behnke MS, Dunay IR, Mashayekhi M, Rommereim LM, Fox BA, et al. Phosphorylation of immunity-related GTPases by a Toxoplasma gondii-secreted kinase promotes macrophage survival and virulence. Cell Host & Microbe. 2010;8:484–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Steinfeldt T, Konen-Waisman S, Tong L, Pawlowski N, Lamkemeyer T, Sibley LD, et al. Phosphorylation of mouse immunity-related GTPase (IRG) resistnace proteins is an evasion strategy for virulent Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000576 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Thomas JW, Ellis B, Boerner RJ, Knight WB, White GC, 2nd, Schaller MD. SH2- and SH3-mediated interactions between focal adhesion kinase and Src. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:577–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schaller MD, Hildebrand JD, Shannon JD, Fox JW, Vines RR, Parsons JT. Autophosphorylation of the focal adhesion kinase, pp125FAK, directs SH2-dependent binding of pp60src. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:1680–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xing Z, Chen HC, Nowlen JK, Taylor SJ, Shalloway D, Guan JL. Direct interaction of v-Src with the focal adhesion kinase mediated by the Src SH2 domain. Mol Biol Cell. 1994;5:413–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Eide BL, Turck CW, Escobedo JA. Identification of Tyr-397 as the primary site of tyrosine phosphorylation and pp60src association in the focal adhesion kinase, pp125FAK. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:2819–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kessler H, Hern-Gotz A, Hegge S, Rauch M, Soldati-Favre D, Frischknecht F, et al. Micronem protein 8—a new essential invasion factor in Toxoplasma gondii. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:947–56. doi: 10.1242/jcs.022350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Guan JL, Trevithick JE, Hynes RO. Fibronectin/integrin interaction induces tyrosine phosphorylation of a 120-kDa protein. Cell Regul. 1991;2:951–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pfaff M, Tangemann K, Muller B, Gurrath M, Muller G, Kessler H, et al. Selective recognition of cyclic RGD peptides of NMR defined conformation by alpha IIb beta 3, alpha V beta 3, and alpha 5 beta 1 integrins. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:20233–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Parvani JG, Galliher-Beckley AJ, Schiemann BJ, Schiemann WP. Targeted inactivation of beta1 integrin induces beta3 integrin switching, which drives breast cancer metastasis by TGF-beta. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24:3449–59. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E12-10-0776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Biscardi JS, Maa MC, Tice DA, Cox ME, Leu TH, Parsons JT. c-Src-mediated phosphorylation of the epidermal growth factor receptor on Tyr845 and Tyr1101 is associated with modulation of receptor function. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:8335–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tice DA, Biscardi JS, Nickles AL, Parsons SJ. Mechanism of biological synergy between cellular Src and epidermal growth factor receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:1415–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kloth MT, Laughlin KK, Biscardi JS, Boerner JL, Parsons SJ, Silva CM. STAT5b, a Mediator of Synergism between c-Src and the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:1671–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207289200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sato K, Nagao T, Iwasaki T, Nishihira Y, Fukami Y. Src-dependent phosphorylation of the EGF receptor Tyr-845 mediates Stat-p21waf1 pathway in A431 cells. Genes Cells. 2003;8:995–1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Balanis N, Wendt MK, Schiemann BJ, Wang Z, Schiemann WP, Carlin CR. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition promotes breast cancer progression via a fibronectin-dependent STAT3 signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:17954–67. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.475277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Butcher BA, Kim L, Panopoulos AD, Watowich SS, Murray PJ, Denkers EY. IL-10-independent STAT3 activation by Toxoplasma gondii mediates suppression of IL-12 and TNF-alpha in host macrophages. J Immunol. 2005;174:3148–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Saeij JP, Coller S, Boyle JP, Jerome ME, White MW, Boothroyd JC. Toxoplasma co-opts host gene expression by injection of a polymorphic kinase homologue. Nature. 2007;445(7125):324–7. doi: 10.1038/nature05395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Butcher BA, Fox BA, Rommereim LM, Kim SG, Maurer KJ, Yarovinsky F, et al. Toxoplasma gondii rhoptry kinase ROP16 activates STAT3 and STAT6 resulting in cytokine inhibition and arginase-1-dependent growth control. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(9):e1002236 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.van Grol J, Subauste MC, Andrade RM, Fujinaga K, Nelson JA, Subauste CS. HIV-1 inhibits autophagy in bystander macrophages/monocytic cells through Src-Akt and STAT3. PLoS One. 2010:e11733 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shen S, Niso-Santano M, Adjemian S, Takehara T, Malik SA, Minoux H, et al. Cytoplasmic STAT3 represses autophagy by inhibiting PKR activity. Mol Cell. 2012;48:667–80. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Talloczy Z, Jiang W, Virgin HW, Leib DA, Scheuner D, Kaufman RJ, et al. Regulation of starvation- and virus-induced autophagy by the eIF2α signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:190–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012485299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ogolla P, Portillo J-AC, White CL, Patel K, Lamb B, Sen GC, et al. The protein kinase double-stranded RNA-dependent (PKR) enhances protection against disease cause by a non-viral pathogen. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e100557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Talloczy Z, Virgin HW, Levine B. PKR-dependent autophagic degradation of herpes simplex virus type 1. Autophagy. 2006;2:24–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Schaller MD. Cellular functions of FAK kinases: insight into molecular mechanisms and novel functions. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:1007–13. doi: 10.1242/jcs.045112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vadali K, Cai X, Schaller MD. Focal adhesion kinase: an essential kinase in the regulation of cardiovascular functions. IUBMB Life. 2007;59:709–16. doi: 10.1080/15216540701694245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gonzalez V, Combe A, David V, Malmquist NA, Delorme V, Leroy C, et al. Host cell entry by apicomplexa parasites requires actin polymerization in the host cell. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;5:259–72. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sweeney KR, Morrissette NS, LaChapelle S, Blader IJ. Host cell invasion by Toxoplasma gondii is temporally regulated by the host microtubule cytoskeleton. Eukaryot Cell. 2010;9:1680–9. doi: 10.1128/EC.00079-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Takemae H, Sugi T, Kobayashi K, Gong H, Ishiwa A, Recuenco FC, et al. Characterization of the interaction between Toxoplasma gondii rhoptry neck protein 4 and host cellular beta-tubulin. Sci Rep. 2013;3:3199 doi: 10.1038/srep03199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Carpenter G. Employment of the epidermal growth factor receptor in growth factor-independent signaling pathways. J Cell Biol. 1999;146:697–702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Owen KA, Meyer CB, Bouton AH, Casanova JE. Activation of focal adhesion kinase by Salmonella suppresses autophagy via an Akt/mTOR signaling pathway and promotes bacterial survival in macrophages. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(6):e1004159 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Silver DL, Naora H, Liu J, Cheng W, Montell DJ. Activated signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3: localization in focal adhesions and function in ovarian cancer cell motility. Cancer Res. 2004;64:3550–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Oh HM, Yu CR, Dambuza I, Marrero B, Egwuagu CE. STAT3 protein interacts with Class O Forkhead transcription factors in the cytoplasm and regulates nuclear/cytoplasmic localization of FoxO1 and FoxO3a proteins in CD4(+) T cells. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:30436–43. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.359661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sehgal PB. Paradigm shifts in the cell biology of STAT signaling. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2008;19:329–40. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.07.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sepulveda P, Encabo A, Carbonell-Uberos F, Minana MD. BCL-2 expression is mainly regulated by JAK/STAT3 pathway in human CD34+ hematopoietic cells. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:378–80. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kang R, Loux T, Tang D, Schapiro NE, Vernon P, Livesey KM, et al. The expression of the receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) is permissive for early pancreatic neoplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:7031–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113865109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Portillo J-AC, Okenka G, Reed E, Subauste A, Van Grol J, Gentil K, et al. The CD40-autophagy pathway is needed for host protection despite IFN-γ-dependent immunity and CD40 induces autophagy via control of p21 levels. Plos One. 2010;e14472 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chatuverdi LS, Marsh HM, Shang X, Zheng Y, Basson MD. Repetitive deformation activates focal adhesion kinase and ERK mitogenic signals in human Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells through Src and Rac1. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:14–28. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605817200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yu L, Alva A, Su H, Dutt P, Freundt E, Welsh S, et al. Regulation of an ATG7-beclin 1 program of autophagic cell death by caspase-8. Science. 2004;304:1500–2. doi: 10.1126/science.1096645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Konnikova L, Kotecki M, Kruger MM, Cochran BH. Knockdown of STAT3 expression by RNAi induces apoptosis in astrocytoma cells. BMC Cancer. 2003;3:23 doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-3-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hirata Y, Ohmae T, Shibata W, Maeda S, Ogura K, Yoshida H, et al. MyD88 and TNF Receptor-Assocaited Factor 6 are critical signal transducers in Helicobacter pylori-infected human epithelial cells. J Immunol. 2006;176:3796–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wen Z, Darnell JE Jr. Mapping of Stat3 serine phosphorylation to a single residue (727) and evidence that serine phosphorylation has no influence on DNA binding of Stat1 and Stat3. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:2062–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Andrade RM, Wessendarp M, Gubbels MJ, Striepen B, Subauste CS. CD40 induces macrophage anti-Toxoplasma gondii activity by triggering autophagy-dependent fusion of pathogen-containing vacuoles and lysosomes. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:2366–77. doi: 10.1172/JCI28796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Van Grol J, Muniz-Feliciano L, Portillo J-AC, Bonilha VL, Subauste CS. CD40 induces anti-Toxoplasma gondii activity in non-hematopoietic cells dependent on autophagy proteins. Infect Immun. 2013;81:2002–11. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01145-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.