Abstract
The cranial suture complex is a heterogeneous tissue consisting of osteogenic progenitor cells and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from bone marrow and suture mesenchyme. The fusion of cranial sutures is a highly coordinated and tightly regulated process during development. Craniosynostosis is a congenital malformation caused by premature fusion of cranial sutures. While the progenitor cells derived from the cranial suture complex should prove valuable for studying the molecular mechanisms underlying suture development and pathogenic premature suture fusion, primary human cranial suture progenitors (SuPs) have limited life span and gradually lose osteoblastic ability over passages. To overcome technical challenges in maintaining sufficient and long‐term culture of SuPs for suture biology studies, we establish and characterize the reversibly immortalized human cranial suture progenitors (iSuPs). Using a reversible immortalization system expressing SV40 T flanked with FRT sites, we demonstrate that primary human suture progenitor cells derived from the patent sutures of craniosynostosis patients can be efficiently immortalized. The iSuPs maintain long‐term proliferative activity, express most of the consensus MSC markers and can differentiate into osteogenic and adipogenic lineages upon BMP9 stimulation in vitro and in vivo. The removal of SV40 T antigen by FLP recombinase results in a decrease in cell proliferation and an increase in the endogenous osteogenic and adipogenic capability in the iSuPs. Therefore, the iSuPs should be a valuable resource to study suture development, intramembranous ossification and the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis, as well as to explore cranial bone tissue engineering.
Keywords: cranial suture, craniosynostosis, BMP9, suture‐derived stem cells, osteogenic differentiation, adipogenesis, cell immortalization
Introduction
Cranial bones are flat bones and formed through intramembranous ossification, which is a process of the condensation and proliferation of MSCs and subsequent differentiation into osteoblasts and osteocytes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Cranial vault sutures are fibrous tissues uniting the adjacent osteogenic fronts of two calvaria. During craniofacial development, they serve as the major sites of bone growth and the suture mesenchyme has been reported to serve as the niche of skeletal stem cells 6. Functionally, sutures need to remain in an unfused state from infancy through early adulthood, and in the meanwhile, the cells in the middle of suture mesenchyme remain undifferentiated, yet allow bone to be formed at the edges of the bone fronts in response to external stimuli and allow the skull to change shape and grow during development 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12. Thus, patency and fusion of cranial sutures are highly coordinated and tightly regulated processes during development.
Craniosynostosis is a common congenital malformation and is the premature fusion of one or more of the cranial sutures, occurring approximately in 1 of 2000–2500 live births 1, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12. In patients with craniosynostosis, the normal growth of the skull is restricted by premature ossification of the cranial sutures leading to numerous morphologic abnormalities, functional deficiencies and potential developmental delay 11, 13. Currently, patients with craniosynostosis are treated surgically soon after diagnosis to reshape the skull and attempt to avoid downstream problems with elevated intracranial pressure 12, 14, although there have been attempts to explore molecular therapies targeting the affected pathways in the past few years 9, 15, 16, 17. Craniosynostosis is clinically categorized as non‐syndromic or syndromic in nature. Mechanistically, mutations in FGFRs, Msx2 and Twist are associated with the most common syndromes that manifest craniosynostosis 10, 12, 14. Members of the BMP and TGFβ superfamily are also implicated in craniosynostosis 15, 18. Nonetheless, the molecular biology underlying suture development and pathogenic process of non‐syndromic craniosynostosis remain to be fully understood.
The cranial suture complex is a heterogeneous tissue consisting of osteogenic progenitor cells and MSCs from bone marrow and suture mesenchyme 6, 19, 20. MSCs are multipotent stem cells that are able to differentiate into multiple lineages, including osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic lineages, and have been isolated from numerous tissues including bone marrow, periosteum, liver and adipose 21, 22, 23, 24. MSCs can be isolated from cranial bone marrow and cranial suture mesenchyme 6, 8, 20, 25, as well as human primary cranial suture cells 19, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30.
Early studies indicated that human cranial suture cells possess similar characteristics of pre‐osteoblastic progenitor cells 28, 29, 30, 31. Therefore, the progenitor cells derived from cranial suture complex may serve as a valuable resource for studying the molecular mechanisms underlying suture development and pathogenic premature suture fusion. Although mouse suture MSCs were shown to retain relatively long‐term self‐renewing, clonal expanding and differentiating abilities under special conditions 8, the human primary cranial suture cells usually have limited life span in vitro and may lose osteoblastic ability after certain passages 19. Therefore, it is highly desirable to establish stable human cranial SuPs, which ideally possess long‐term proliferative capability while retaining osteogenic potential.
Here, we established the reversibly iSuPs by introducing SV40 T antigen into the primary SuPs derived from unfused cranial sutures of craniosynostosis patients. We demonstrated that the iSuPs maintain long‐term proliferative activity, express most of the consensus MSC markers and possess osteogenic and adipogenic potential when stimulated with the potent osteogenic and adipogenic factor BMP9 32, 33, 34, 35. The immortalization of iSuPs can be reversed by the removal of SV40 T antigen. Therefore, the iSuPs should be a valuable resource to study suture development and pathogenesis of premature suture fusion in craniosynostosis, as well as a potential therapeutic agent for cranial bone tissue engineering.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and chemicals
HEK‐293 (from ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and its derivative line 293pTP cells were maintained in the completed Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) as 36, 37, 38, 39. Unless indicated otherwise, all chemicals were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) or Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA).
Isolation of cranial SuPs from the unfused (patent) coronal sutures of craniosynostosis patients
The use of human cranial suture samples was approved by the institutional review board. The informed consent forms were signed by the guardians of the affected children according to the approved guidelines by the Institutional Review Board. The unfused (patent) coronal sutures were retrieved from three male patients, aged 15–17 months and undergoing cranial vault reconstruction for craniosynostosis at the Comer Children's Hospital of The University of Chicago Medicine. The suture samples consisted of suture mesenchyme plus approximately 5 mm of bone on either side and were placed in Ringers solution until processed in the laboratory.
The primary cranial SuPs were grown from human suture samples 19. Briefly, the dissociated suture samples were rinsed with cold sterile PBS with 1% penicillin/streptomycin solution, and minced into 1.0 mm fragments, followed by incubation in 0.25% trypsin/1 mM EDTA with gentle agitations at 37°C for 30 min. Ten milliliters of complete DMEM was added to inactivate trypsin. The digested cell/tissue mixture was transferred to 100‐mm cell culture dishes and incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 maintained at 37°C. After approximately 10–14 days, cells grew to 80% confluency at that point and were passaged to 25‐cm2 flasks containing 8 ml of complete DMEM for experimentation. While primary SuPs were stored in liquid nitrogen tanks, passages #2 to #5 were used in this study.
Establishment of reversibly immortalized cranial suture progenitors (iSuPs)
The use of the retroviral vector SSR #41 or SSR#69 to express SV40 T antigen flanked with the FRT or loxP sites has been previously described 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48. Briefly, the SSR #41 vector and pCL‐Ampho packaging vector were cotransfected into HEK‐293 cells to produce the packaged retrovirus. The stably immortalized cranial suture progenitors were established by infecting the primary SuPs with retrovirus and selecting with hygromycin B (0.3 mg/ml) for 5–7 days, designated as iSuPs.
Recombinant adenoviruses expressing BMP9, Flippase (FLP) and Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP)
Recombinant adenoviruses were generated using the AdEasy technology as previously described 49, 50. The coding regions of human BMP9, FLP recombinase and GFP were PCR amplified and cloned into an adenoviral shuttle vector and subsequently used to generate recombinant adenoviruses in HEK‐293 or 293pTP cells 39. The resulting adenoviruses were designated as Ad‐BMP9 and Ad‐FLP, both of which also express GFP as the marker for monitoring infection efficiency. Analogous adenovirus expressing only GFP (Ad‐GFP) was used as a control 51, 52. In order to enhance transgene transduction efficiency, polybrene (8 μg/ml) was added to the culture medium for all adenovirus infections 53.
Crystal violet assay
Subconfluent cells were seeded in 35‐mm cell culture dishes and infected with the Ad‐FLP or Ad‐GFP adenovirus. The infected cells were subjected to crystal violet staining at the indicated time‐points. Macrographic staining images were recorded for the stained dishes. For quantitative measurement, the stained cells were dissolved in 10% acetic acid at room temperature with agitation and optical density was measured at 570~590 nm 51, 54.
WST‐1 cell proliferation assay
Exponentially growing cells were infected with appropriate adenoviruses and/or plated into 96‐well culture plates at 20% confluence. Unseeded wells were utilized as background controls. At the indicated time‐points, the premixed WST‐1 (BD Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) was added to each well and incubated at the 37°C CO2 incubator for 3 hrs. The plates were subjected to a microtitre plate reader to obtain absorbance reading at 450 nm. The obtained A450 nm values were subjected to background reading subtractions. Each assay condition was performed in triplicate 36, 55.
Immunofluorescence staining
Immunofluorescence staining was performed 43, 51. Briefly, cells were seeded in 24‐well plates overnight, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 1% NP‐40 and blocked with 10% donkey serum (Jackson Immuno‐Research Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA), followed by incubating with CD73, CD105/endoglin, CD90/Thy‐1, CD166/ALCAM, BMPR‐II, CD117/c‐kit or CD29/Integrin β1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) for 1 hr at room temperature, as previously reported 43, 56. After being washed, cells were incubated with Texas Red or FITC labelled secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) for 30 min. Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Stains without primary antibodies were used as negative controls. Fluorescence images were recorded under an inverted fluorescence microscope.
RNA isolation and Touchdown qPCR (TqPCR) analysis
Subconfluent cells were seeded in 60‐mm dishes in a complete DMEM with different treatments. Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol Reagents (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cDNA synthesis was carried out using hexamer and M‐MuLV Reverse Transcriptase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). The cDNA products were diluted 10‐ to 50‐fold and used as PCR templates. PCR primers (Table S1) were designed using Primer3 Plus 57 (approximately 100–200 bp). The TqPCR program was carried out as follows: 95°C × 3 sec. for one cycle; 95°C × 20 sec., 66°C × 10 sec., for 4 cycles by decreasing 3°C per cycle; 95°C × 20 sec., 55°C × 10 sec., 70°C × 1 sec., followed by plate read, for 40 cycles 58. GAPDH was used as a reference gene. Each assay condition was performed in triplicate.
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assay
ALP activity was assessed quantitatively with a modified assay using the Great Escape SEAP Chemiluminescence assay kit (BD Clontech) and qualitatively with histochemical staining assay (using a mixture of 0.1 mg/ml naphthol AS‐MX phosphate and 0.6 mg/ml Fast Blue BB salt) 46, 59. Each assay condition was performed in triplicate, and the results were repeated in at least three independent experiments.
Matrix mineralization assay (Alizarin Red S staining)
The iSuPs were seeded in 24‐well culture plates, infected with Ad‐BMP9 or Ad‐GFP and cultured in the presence of ascorbic acid (50 mg/ml) and β‐glycerophosphate (10 mM). At 14 days post‐infection, mineralized matrix nodules were stained for calcium precipitation using Alizarin Red S staining 32, 60. Briefly, cells were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde at room temperature for 10 min. and washed with PBS (pH adjusted to 4.2), and fixed cells were left in 37°C incubator with 2% Alizarin Red S for 10 min., while staining was monitored under microscope every 2–5 min., followed by extensively rinsing with PBS. The staining of calcium mineral deposits was recorded under a bright field microscope. Each assay condition was performed in triplicate.
Oil Red O staining assay
Exponentially growing cells were plated onto 24‐well culture plates and infected with Ad‐BMP9 or Ad‐GFP. Oil Red O staining was performed at 10 days post‐infection as previously described 35, 61. Briefly, cells were fixed with 10% formalin at room temperature for 10 min., followed by gentle washing with PBS. The fixed cells were stained with freshly prepared Oil Red O solution (six parts saturated Oil Red O dye in isopropanol plus four parts water) for 60 min. at room temperature, followed by washing with PBS. The staining of lipid droplets was recorded under a bright field microscope. Each assay condition was performed in triplicate.
Subcutaneous implantation of BMP9‐transduced iSuPs for ectopic bone formation and adipogenesis
All animal care and use in this study followed the approved protocol by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Stem cell‐mediated ectopic bone formation was performed 59, 62. Briefly, iSuPs were infected with Ad‐BMP9 or Ad‐GFP for 24 hrs, harvested and resuspended in sterile PBS for subcutaneous injection (at 2 × 106 cells/injection, 4 × 106 cells/injection, and 6 × 106 cells/injection; eight injections/dose/group; four injections/mouse) into the flanks of athymic nude (nu/nu) mice (female, 5–6 weeks old; Harlan Research Laboratories/ENVIGO, Indianapolis, IN, USA). At 4 weeks after implantation, the mice were killed, and the implantation sites were retrieved for micro‐CT imaging and histologic evaluations.
Micro‐computed tomography (μCT) analysis
The retrieved specimens were fixed and imaged using the μCT component of the GE triumph (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) trimodality preclinical imaging system. All image data analyses were performed using Amira 5.3 (Visage Imaging, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), and 3D volumetric data were determined 61, 63.
H&E staining and trichrome staining
After being imaged, the retrieved tissues were fixed, decalcified in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections of the embedded specimens were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H & E). Trichrome stains were carried out 64, 65.
Statistical analysis
All quantitative studies were carried out in triplicate and/or performed in three independent batches. Microsoft Excel program (Redmond, WA, USA) was carried out to calculate standard deviation (S.D.). Statistically significant differences between samples were determined by one‐way analysis of variance and the two‐tailed Student's t‐test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant when one comparison was being made.
Results
Establishment of immortalized human cranial suture stem cells (iSuPs), which exhibit long‐term high proliferative activity
Although human cranial suture cells have been used rather extensively, their biological features are not thoroughly characterized 6, 19, 26. While readily available, it is time‐consuming to isolate and culture primary cranial suture cells. More importantly, it is challenging to obtain human clinical specimens of cranial sutures. Here, we sought to establish reversibly immortalized human suture progenitor cells (iSuPs) and to investigate their osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation capability. We isolated the primary cranial progenitor cell (SuPs) from the patent cranial sutures of three craniosynostosis patients 19, 42, 43. After 24 hrs, fibroblast‐like primary cells were observed migrating outwards from the minced fragments of suture tissues (Fig. 1A, panel a). Primary SuPs grew well in culture, albeit slowly, and the morphology of primary SuPs was shown at day 9 and day 14 (Fig. 1A, panels b and c), as well as at passage 3 (Fig. 1A, panel d).
The recovered and subconfluent primary SuPs were subjected to immortalization utilizing the retroviral vector SSR#41 that contains the hygromycin and SV40 T antigen expression cassette flanked with FRT sites (Fig. 1B) 40. We previously used this system to successfully obtain a large panel of reversibly immortalized progenitor cells 42, 43, 45, 46. After hygromycin selection, colonies that formed by the surviving cells were observed at as early as at 5 days after selection (Fig. 1C, panel a) and the colonies became more obvious at 14 days after selection (Fig. 1C, panel b). The iSuPs grew more rapidly and maintained a high proliferation rate after 20 passages (Fig. 1C, panels c & d). In fact, the iSuPs have been passed consecutively for more than 60 generations thus far and proliferate well. Thus, these results indicate that we successfully immortalized SuPs.
We subsequently compared the proliferative activities between primary SuPs and iSuPs. WST‐1 cell proliferation assay showed that iSuPs exhibited a higher proliferation rate than that of SuPs, especially within the first 4 days (Fig. 1D). Likewise, crystal violet staining assay indicated that iSuPs reached confluence at as early as day 5, while primary SuPs reached confluence at day 7 when both started with the same cell density (Fig. 1E, panel a). Quantitative assessment of the stained cells confirmed the staining results that iSuPs had significantly higher cell staining after day 5 than that of the SuPs (Fig. 1E, panel b). The above results demonstrate that the iSuPs can be stably maintained in culture and exhibit a high proliferative rate.
The iSuPs express most of the MSC markers
It has been reported that cranial suture tissues contain MSC‐like progenitor cells 6, 8, 10, 66. We examined whether the immortalization process would affect the expression of MSC markers. It has been reported that consensus human MSC markers include CD73, CD105/endoglin, CD90/Thy‐1, CD166/ALCAM 67. Using immunofluorescence staining, we detected whether the iSuPs express these MSC markers. We found that all of these consensus markers were readily detectable in the majority of the iSuPs (Fig. 2A). Moreover, the expression of other MSC and/or progenitor markers also has been detected, such as BMPR‐II, CD117/c‐kit and CD29/Integrin β1 (Fig. 2B). Collectively, these results demonstrated that iSuPs express most of the consensus MSC markers, suggesting that these cells may possess MSC‐like characteristics.
The iSuPs are capable of differentiating into osteogenic and adipogenic lineages upon BMP9 stimulation
We previously demonstrated that that BMP9 is one of most osteogenic BMPs among the human BMP family and can induce osteogenic, adipogenic and, to a lesser extent, chondrogenic differentiation 32, 33, 34, 35. We analysed the osteogenic potential of the iSuPs in vitro. When the early osteogenic marker ALP was evaluated, BMP9 was shown to induce a stronger ALP staining in the iSuPs than that of control group at the indicated time‐points although basal ALP activity was also detected at as early as day 3 (Fig. 3A, panel a). The ALP activity induced by BMP9 in the iSuPs was further assessed quantitatively, and similar results were obtained (Fig. 3A, panel b). We also conducted Alizarin Red S staining to assess matrix mineralization, which is an indicator of the late stage of osteogenic differentiation in vitro. When BMP9‐infected iSuPs were cultured in mineralization medium for 14 days, apparent mineralized extracellular matrix nodules were observed (Fig. 3B). Collectively, the above results indicated that the iSuPs are responsive to BMP9 and retain osteogenic potential upon BMP9 stimulation.
We further examined the adipogenic potential of the iSuPs. When iSuPs were transduced with BMP9 for 10 days, Oil Red O staining revealed that the cells exhibited a significantly higher level of lipid droplet formation than that of the control group (Fig. 3C). These results strongly suggest that the iSuPs may possess adipogenic potential upon BMP9 stimulation, and that iSuPs may be multipotent and capable of differentiating into different MSC lineages upon BMP9 stimulation.
FLP recombinase‐mediated removal of SV40 T antigen decreases the proliferative activity and increases endogenous osteogenic and adipogenic capability of the iSuPs
As shown in Figure 1B, the immortalizing gene SV40 T antigen can be excised via the action of FLP recombinase on the flanking FRT sites. We tested whether the immortalization could be effectively reversed in iSuPs. A recombinant adenoviral vector Ad‐FLP has been used to effectively express FLP 46, 56. We found that the iSuPs could be infected by Ad‐FLP or Ad‐GFP with a high efficiency (Fig. 4A, panels a & b). The efficient removal of SV40 T antigen by FLP was confirmed by TqPCR analysis in Ad‐FLP‐infected iSuPs, but not in the GFP control group (Fig. 4A, panel c). The cell proliferation rate of the Ad‐FLP‐infected iSuPs was decreased as assessed by crystal violet staining (Fig. 4B, panel a), while quantitative analysis of the staining showed that the decrease in cell growth was obviously lower from day 5 to day 7 than that of the GFP group (P < 0.001) (Fig. 4B, panel b). Furthermore, WST‐1 cell proliferation revealed that the Ad‐FLP‐transduced iSuPs had a lower proliferation rate, at as early as day 4 after infection, than that of control group (Fig. 4C). Collectively, these results strongly suggest that the immortalization of iSuPs may be effectively reversed by FLP recombinase.
We further analysed the spontaneous differentiation potential of the iSuPs upon Ad‐FLP‐mediated removal of SV40 T antigen in iSuPs. We found that when iSuPs were infected with Ad‐FLP or Ad‐GFP, the ALP activity increased in the Ad‐FLP‐infected iSuPs, compared to that of the Ad‐GFP‐infected control group (Fig. 4D). The effect of FLP‐mediated reversal on late stage differentiation of the iSuPs was also examined. When the iSuPs were infected with Ad‐FLP or Ad‐GFP and cultured in mineralization medium for 14 days, we found that FLP‐infected iSuPs had a significantly greater amount of matrix mineralization nodules, as assessed by Alizarin Red S staining, than that of the GFP‐infected group (Fig. 4E, panel a). Furthermore, when the iSuPs were transduced with Ad‐FLP or Ad‐GFP for 10 days and stained with Oil Red O staining, we found that the FLP‐infected iSuPs were able to undergo adipogenic differentiation, compared with that of GFP‐infected control iSuPs (Fig. 4E, panel b). Thus, these results indicate that FLP‐transduced iSuPs are able to undergo spontaneous differentiation into osteogenic and adipogenic lineages.
BMP9 regulates the expression of multiple lineage regulators and the craniosynostosis‐associated gene Nell‐1 in iSuPs
We previously identified several early key downstream mediators of BMP9 signalling in MSCs, such as Smad6, Id1 and Hey1 68, 69, 70. Here, we tested whether the iSuPs were responsive to BMP9 stimulation. When the iSuPs were infected with Ad‐BMP9 or Ad‐GFP for 36 and 72 hrs, TqPCR analysis showed that both Smad6 and Id1 were significantly up‐regulated in BMP9‐infected iSuPs at 36 or 72 hrs, while the expression of Hey1 was significantly up‐regulated at 72 hrs, compared with that of the Ad‐GFP‐infected group (P < 0.01) (Fig. 5A), indicating that the iSuPs are responsive to the stimulation of BMP9.
Given the fact that iSuPs express most of MSC markers, we next tested whether the iSuPs were able to differentiate into osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic lineages. When the iSuPs were infected with Ad‐BMP9, Runx2 and Osterix, both osteogenic lineage regulators, were remarkably up‐regulated at day 7, while the expression of the late osteogenic markers osteocalcin and osteopontin was also significantly increased at day 7 (Fig. 5B). We further analysed the expression of adipogenic lineage regulator PPARγ and the early adipogenic marker C/EBPβ 35, 71, and both genes were significantly up‐regulated at day 7 (Fig. 5C). Interestingly, the chondrogenic regulator Sox9 was up‐regulated in the iSuPs by BMP9 at day 7, but the change did not reach any statistical significance (data not shown). This is not surprising considering the fact that the iSuPs were derived from cranial sutures, which are formed through intramembranous ossification rather than endochondral ossification.
We further examined whether Nell‐1 was regulated by BMP9 in the iSuPs. Nel‐like molecule‐1 (Nell‐1) is a secreted protein first identified through its overexpression in pathologically fusing and fused suture specimens from patients with craniosynostosis. Because that either overexpression or deficiency of Nell‐1 could lead to significant cranial abnormalities in mice 72, 73, we tested whether BMP9 induced the expression of Nell‐1 in the iSuPs. When the iSuPs were infected with Ad‐BMP9 or Ad‐GFP, quantitative TqPCR analysis showed that Nell‐1 was significantly up‐regulated in BMP9‐infected iSuPs at as early as day 3 (P < 0.05) and continued to increase at day 7 (Fig. 5D). These results indicate that Nell‐1 may be regulated by BMP9 in the iSuPs.
BMP9 induces effective osteogenesis and adipogenesis of iSuPs in a stem cell implantation model in vivo
We further tested whether the iSuPs were to undergo multilineage differentiation in vivo using the well‐established stem cell implantation assay 46, 74. The iSuPs infected with Ad‐BMP9 or Ad‐GFP were subcutaneously injected into the flanks of athymic nude mice with three different dosages. At 4 weeks after injection, the masses were retrieved from the mice injected with BMP9‐infected iSuPs, and we found the sizes of the masses were roughly proportional to the numbers of Ad‐BMP9‐transduced iSuPs injected (Fig. 6A, panel a). The bony masses were further confirmed by μCT imaging (Fig. 6A, panel b). No detectable masses were formed in the Ad‐GFP group (data not shown). In fact, the injection sites of the iSuPs infected with Ad‐GFP disappeared in approximately 10 days after injection. Histologic analysis of the retrieved masses indicated that the BMP9‐transduced iSuPs formed mature and highly mineralized osteoid matrix, while densely populated adipocytes were also readily detected (Fig. 6B). Trichrome staining further confirmed that the masses retrieved from the BMP9‐infected iSuPs exhibited highly mature and well‐mineralized trabecular bony structure (Fig. 6C). Therefore, these in vivo results strongly indicate that the iSuPs are multipotent progenitor cells and have osteogenic and adipogenic potential, which can be effectively induced by BMP9.
Discussion
Although MSCs can be isolated from various tissues including bone marrow, periosteum, liver, adipose, brain, skeletal muscle and amniotic fluid 21, 22, 23, 24, they exhibit significant differences in their expression profiles and differentiation potential 75. There are three minimal criteria to define human MSCs 67. First, MSCs must be plastic‐adherent when maintained in standard culture conditions. Second, MSCs must express specific surface antigen such as CD105, CD73 and CD90. Third, MSCs must differentiate to osteoblasts, adipocytes and chondroblasts in vitro 67.
It has been reported that MSCs can be derived from cranial bone marrow and cranial suture mesenchyme 6, 8, 20, 25. However, the human primary cranial suture cells have limited life span in vitro and may lose osteoblastic potential after certain numbers of passages 19. Thus, there is an essential need to establish stable human cranial suture stem cells (SuPs). Using a reversible SV40 T antigen‐based immortalization system, we have demonstrated that primary suture stem cells retrieved from the patent sutures of craniosynostosis patients can be efficiently immortalized. The iSuPs maintain long‐term proliferative activity and express most of the MSC markers. The iSuPs are multipotent as they can differentiate into osteogenic and adipogenic lineages upon BMP9 stimulation both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, using the ectopic bone formation model, we found that primary SuPs exhibited similar osteogenic and adipogenic capabilities to that of the iSuPs upon BMP9 stimulation (data not shown), indicating that SV40 T antigen‐mediated immortalization does not significantly impact the lineage commitment and differentiation potentials of primary suture progenitor cells. However, primary SuPs have a limited life span in culture. Thus, the iSuPs should serve as a valuable tool to study the molecular mechanism of craniosynostosis, as well as to study the process of intramembranous ossification.
In this study, we also find that BMP9 up‐regulates the expression of Nell‐1 in the iSuPs. Nell‐1 was initially detected at fusing and fused sutures from craniosynostosis patients 76. Nell‐1 is an osteoinductive growth factor 76, 77. It has been shown that either overexpression or deficiency of Nell‐1 leads to significant cranial abnormalities in mice 72, 73. The expression of Nell‐1 is tightly regulated by Runx2, a vital mechanistic convergence point for the development of craniosynostosis 77. Thus, it is conceivable that this up‐regulation of Nell‐1 may be resulted from the BMP9‐induced up‐regulation of Runx2, suggesting that BMP9 may play a potential role in regulating the patency of cranial sutures and the development of craniosynostosis.
While we demonstrate that the iSuPs express most of the MSC markers and are osteogenic and adipogenic, we fail to detect apparent chondrogenic potential of the iSuPs both in vitro and in vivo upon BMP9 stimulation. This may be attributed to the fact that the iSuPs are derived from cranial sutures, where intramembranous ossification, but not endochondral ossification, is the dominant process of bone formation. Thus, the iSuPs may be used as valuable MSC‐like progenitors to study the underlying mechanism of intramembranous ossification. Nonetheless, we also demonstrate that the primary SuPs are proliferative and highly osteogenic and thus may be used as a potential source of MSC progenitors for cranial bone engineering.
Using the SV40 T antigen, one of the most commonly used immortalization genes, we have successfully immortalized numerous cell lines, including embryonic fibroblasts 43, 56, adipose‐derived MSCs (iMADs) 46, stem cells from dental apical papilla 78, mouse melanocytes 44, hepatic progenitor cells 41, 42, 79, calvarial mesenchymal progenitor cells 80, articular chondrocytes 47, foetal heart progenitors 45 and mouse Achilles tenocytes 48. In this study, we utilized SV40 T antigen and successfully established the human iSuPs. However, based on our experience, it is relatively less efficient to immortalize human progenitor cells using SV40 T antigen alone.
Traditional cell immortalization and transformation strategies usually involve in overexpression of oncogenes and/or inactivation of tumour suppressor genes 81. The commonly used oncogenes include telomerase (TERT), KRAS, c‐MYC, CDK4, while the frequently inactivated tumour suppressor genes are p53, Rb and p16INK. It is widely accepted that the ability of SV40 T antigen to immortalize cells is mediated by its ability to complex with p53 and inhibit p53 functions although the exact molecular mechanisms underlying SV40 T antigen‐induced immortalization remain to be fully understood. Nonetheless, unlike the above‐mentioned oncogenes, SV40 T antigen‐transformed cells are usually not tumorigenic 82, 83, which is confirmed in our in vivo studies with the iSuP cells.
In summary, to overcome the technical challenges in maintaining sufficient and long‐term culture of SuPs for suture biology studies and/or possible clinical therapies, we demonstrate that SuPs can be efficiently immortalized by SV40 T antigen. The reversibly immortalized iSuPs exhibit high proliferative activity and retain long‐term cell proliferation, which can be reversed by introducing FLP recombinase. The iSuPs express most of the MSC markers and retain osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation potential upon BMP9 stimulation both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, the iSuPs should be a valuable resource to develop novel strategies of molecular therapy in craniosynostosis or cranial deficiency, as well as to study the processes of intramembranous ossification and adipogenesis. Furthermore, BMP9 may be further explored as a novel factor for cranial bone engineering.
Conflicts of interest
All authors declare no financial conflict of interests.
Author's contributions
TCH, DH, RRR, MJL, JMW and DS designed the project; TCH, DH, RRR, MJL, JMW and DS wrote the manuscript; DS, JY and FZ performed most of the experiments; QW, JLiao, YZ, JF, CM, XH, XQ, LC, LL, YY, XY and ZZhang provided assistance in some experiments and helped on data collections and analyses; CZ, ZZeng, RZ, SY, TW, XW, YS, JLei, YL and WZ provided materials/reagents for the project and assisted some of the experiments; all authors, read and approved the manuscript.
Supporting information
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Philippe Leboulch of Harvard Medical School for providing SSR #41 vector. The reported work was supported in part by research grants from the National Institutes of Health (AT004418, DE020140 to T.C.H. and R.R.R.), the US Department of Defense (OR130096 to J.M.W.), the Scoliosis Research Society (T.C.H. and M.J.L.), the 973 Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of China (#2011CB707906 to T.C.H.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#11472183 to D.H.). D.S. was supported by the Predoctoral Fellowship from the China Scholarship Council. This project was also supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health through Grant Number UL1 TR000430. Funding sources were not involved in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Contributor Information
Dingming Huang, Email: dingminghuang@163.com.
Tong‐Chuan He, Email: tche@uchicago.edu.
References
- 1. Cohen MM Jr. Sutural biology and the correlates of craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet. 1993; 47: 581–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lenton KA, Nacamuli RP, Wan DC, et al Cranial suture biology. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2005; 66: 287–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Slater BJ, Lenton KA, Kwan MD, et al Cranial sutures: a brief review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 170e–8e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Levi B, Wan DC, Wong VW, et al Cranial suture biology: from pathways to patient care. J Craniofac Surg. 2012; 23: 13–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ishii M, Sun J, Ting MC, et al The Development of the Calvarial Bones and Sutures and the Pathophysiology of Craniosynostosis. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2015; 115: 131–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Zhao H, Feng J, Ho TV, et al The suture provides a niche for mesenchymal stem cells of craniofacial bones. Nat Cell Biol. 2015; 17: 386–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Opperman LA. Cranial sutures as intramembranous bone growth sites. Dev Dyn. 2000; 219: 472–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Maruyama T, Jeong J, Sheu TJ, et al Stem cells of the suture mesenchyme in craniofacial bone development, repair and regeneration. Nat Commun. 2016; 7: 10526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lee JC, Spiguel L, Shenaq DS, et al Role of RANK‐RANKL‐OPG axis in cranial suture homeostasis. J Craniofac Surg. 2011; 22: 699–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Teven CM, Farina EM, Rivas J, et al Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in development and skeletal diseases. Genes Dis. 2014; 1: 199–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Morriss‐Kay GM, Wilkie AO. Growth of the normal skull vault and its alteration in craniosynostosis: insights from human genetics and experimental studies. J Anat. 2005; 207: 637–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Governale LS. Craniosynostosis. Pediatr Neurol. 2015; 53: 394–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Garza RM, Khosla RK. Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Semin Plast Surg. 2012; 26: 53–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kimonis V, Gold JA, Hoffman TL, et al Genetics of craniosynostosis. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2007; 14: 150–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Opperman LA, Nolen AA, Ogle RC. TGF‐beta 1, TGF‐beta 2, and TGF‐beta 3 exhibit distinct patterns of expression during cranial suture formation and obliteration in vivo and in vitro . J Bone Miner Res. 1997; 12: 301–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Warren SM, Brunet LJ, Harland RM, et al The BMP antagonist noggin regulates cranial suture fusion. Nature. 2003; 422: 625–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Yin L, Du X, Li C, et al A Pro253Arg mutation in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (Fgfr2) causes skeleton malformation mimicking human Apert syndrome by affecting both chondrogenesis and osteogenesis. Bone. 2008; 42: 631–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Nacamuli RP, Fong KD, Lenton KA, et al Expression and possible mechanisms of regulation of BMP3 in rat cranial sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 116: 1353–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Coussens AK, Hughes IP, Wilkinson CR, et al Identification of genes differentially expressed by prematurely fused human sutures using a novel in vivo ‐ in vitro approach. Differentiation. 2008; 76: 531–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Shinagawa K, Mitsuhara T, Okazaki T, et al The characteristics of human cranial bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Neurosci Lett. 2015; 606: 161–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, et al Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999; 284: 143–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Luther G, Wagner ER, Zhu G, et al BMP‐9 Induced Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: molecular Mechanism and Therapeutic Potential. Curr Gene Ther. 2011; 11: 229–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Prockop DJ. Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissues. Science. 1997; 276: 71–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Rastegar F, Shenaq D, Huang J, et al Mesenchymal stem cells: molecular characteristics and clinical applications. World J Stem Cells. 2010; 2: 67–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Xu Y, Malladi P, Chiou M, et al Isolation and characterization of posterofrontal/sagittal suture mesenchymal cells in vitro . Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 119: 819–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Dwivedi PP, Anderson PJ, Powell BC. Development of an efficient, non‐viral transfection method for studying gene function and bone growth in human primary cranial suture mesenchymal cells reveals that the cells respond to BMP2 and BMP3. BMC Biotechnol. 2012; 12: 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. De Pollack C, Renier D, Hott M, et al Increased bone formation and osteoblastic cell phenotype in premature cranial suture ossification (craniosynostosis). J Bone Miner Res. 1996; 11: 401–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Yousfi M, Lasmoles F, Lomri A, et al Increased bone formation and decreased osteocalcin expression induced by reduced Twist dosage in Saethre‐Chotzen syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2001; 107: 1153–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ratisoontorn C, Seto ML, Broughton KM, et al In vitro differentiation profile of osteoblasts derived from patients with Saethre‐Chotzen syndrome. Bone. 2005; 36: 627–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Lomri A, Lemonnier J, Hott M, et al Increased calvaria cell differentiation and bone matrix formation induced by fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 mutations in Apert syndrome. J Clin Invest. 1998; 101: 1310–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. de Pollak C, Arnaud E, Renier D, et al Age‐related changes in bone formation, osteoblastic cell proliferation, and differentiation during postnatal osteogenesis in human calvaria. J Cell Biochem. 1997; 64: 128–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Cheng H, Jiang W, Phillips FM, et al Osteogenic activity of the fourteen types of human bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85‐A: 1544–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kang Q, Sun MH, Cheng H, et al Characterization of the distinct orthotopic bone‐forming activity of 14 BMPs using recombinant adenovirus‐mediated gene delivery. Gene Ther. 2004; 11: 1312–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Luu HH, Song WX, Luo X, et al Distinct roles of bone morphogenetic proteins in osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res. 2007; 25: 665–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kang Q, Song WX, Luo Q, et al A comprehensive analysis of the dual roles of BMPs in regulating adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2009; 18: 545–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Chen X, Cui J, Yan Z, et al Sustained high level transgene expression in mammalian cells mediated by the optimized piggyBac transposon system. Genes Dis. 2015; 2: 96–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kong Y, Zhang H, Chen X, et al Destabilization of Heterologous Proteins Mediated by the GSK3beta Phosphorylation Domain of the beta‐Catenin Protein. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2013; 32: 1187–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Liu X, Qin J, Luo Q, et al Cross‐talk between EGF and BMP9 signalling pathways regulates the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2013; 17: 1160–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Wu N, Zhang H, Deng F, et al Overexpression of Ad5 precursor terminal protein accelerates recombinant adenovirus packaging and amplification in HEK‐293 packaging cells. Gene Ther. 2014; 21: 629–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Westerman KA, Leboulch P. Reversible immortalization of mammalian cells mediated by retroviral transfer and site‐specific recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996; 93: 8971–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Huang J, Bi Y, Zhu GH, et al Retinoic acid signalling induces the differentiation of mouse fetal liver‐derived hepatic progenitor cells. Liver Int. 2009; 29: 1569–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Bi Y, He Y, Huang J, et al Functional characteristics of reversibly immortalized hepatic progenitor cells derived from mouse embryonic liver. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014; 34: 1318–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Huang E, Bi Y, Jiang W, et al Conditionally Immortalized Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts Retain Proliferative Activity without Compromising Multipotent Differentiation Potential. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e32428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Yang K, Chen J, Jiang W, et al Conditional Immortalization Establishes a Repertoire of Mouse Melanocyte Progenitors with Distinct Melanogenic Differentiation Potential. J Invest Dermatol. 2012; 132: 2479–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Li M, Chen Y, Bi Y, et al Establishment and characterization of the reversibly immortalized mouse fetal heart progenitors. Int J Med Sci. 2013; 10: 1035–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Lu S, Wang J, Ye J, et al Bone morphogenetic protein 9 (BMP9) induces effective bone formation from reversibly immortalized multipotent adipose‐derived (iMAD) mesenchymal stem cells. Am J Transl Res. 2016; 8: 3710–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Lamplot JD, Liu B, Yin L, et al Reversibly Immortalized Mouse Articular Chondrocytes Acquire Long‐Term Proliferative Capability while Retaining Chondrogenic Phenotype. Cell Transplant. 2015; 24: 1053–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Denduluri SK, Scott B, Lamplot JD, et al Immortalized Mouse Achilles Tenocytes Demonstrate Long‐Term Proliferative Capacity While Retaining Tenogenic Properties. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2016; 22: 280–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. He TC, Zhou S, da Costa LT, et al A simplified system for generating recombinant adenoviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998; 95: 2509–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Luo J, Deng ZL, Luo X, et al A protocol for rapid generation of recombinant adenoviruses using the AdEasy system. Nat Protoc. 2007; 2: 1236–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Hu N, Jiang D, Huang E, et al BMP9‐regulated angiogenic signaling plays an important role in the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells. J Cell Sci. 2013; 126: 532–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Huang E, Zhu G, Jiang W, et al Growth hormone synergizes with BMP9 in osteogenic differentiation by activating the JAK/STAT/IGF1 pathway in murine multilineage cells. J Bone Miner Res. 2012; 27: 1566–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Zhao C, Wu N, Deng F, et al Adenovirus‐mediated gene transfer in mesenchymal stem cells can be significantly enhanced by the cationic polymer polybrene. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e92908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. He BC, Chen L, Zuo GW, et al Synergistic antitumor effect of the activated PPARgamma and retinoid receptors on human osteosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 16: 2235–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Li R, Hu Z, Sun SY, et al Niclosamide overcomes acquired resistance to erlotinib through suppression of STAT3 in non‐small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013; 12: 2200–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Wang N, Zhang W, Cui J, et al The piggyBac Transposon‐Mediated Expression of SV40 T Antigen Efficiently Immortalizes Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts (MEFs). PLoS One. 2014; 9: e97316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, et al Primer3–new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40: e115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Zhang Q, Wang J, Deng F, et al TqPCR: a Touchdown qPCR Assay with Significantly Improved Detection Sensitivity and Amplification Efficiency of SYBR Green qPCR. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0132666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Wang N, Zhang H, Zhang BQ, et al Adenovirus‐mediated efficient gene transfer into cultured three‐dimensional organoids. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e93608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Li Y, Wagner ER, Yan Z, et al The Calcium‐Binding Protein S100A6 Accelerates Human Osteosarcoma Growth by Promoting Cell Proliferation and Inhibiting Osteogenic Differentiation. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015; 37: 2375–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Chen L, Jiang W, Huang J, et al Insulin‐like growth factor 2 (IGF‐2) potentiates BMP‐9‐induced osteogenic differentiation and bone formation. J Bone Miner Res. 2010; 25: 2447–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Zhang H, Wang J, Deng F, et al Canonical Wnt signaling acts synergistically on BMP9‐induced osteo/odontoblastic differentiation of stem cells of dental apical papilla (SCAPs). Biomaterials. 2015; 39: 145–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Li R, Zhang W, Cui J, et al Targeting BMP9‐promoted human osteosarcoma growth by inactivation of notch signaling. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2014; 14: 274–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Tang N, Song WX, Luo J, et al BMP9‐induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal progenitors requires functional canonical Wnt/beta‐catenin signaling. J Cell Mol Med. 2009; 13: 2448–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Gao Y, Huang E, Zhang H, et al Crosstalk between Wnt/beta‐Catenin and Estrogen Receptor Signaling Synergistically Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e82436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Truong T, Zhang X, Pathmanathan D, et al Craniosynostosis‐associated gene nell‐1 is regulated by runx2. J Bone Miner Res. 2007; 22: 7–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, et al Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006; 8: 315–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Peng Y, Kang Q, Cheng H, et al Transcriptional characterization of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs)‐mediated osteogenic signaling. J Cell Biochem. 2003; 90: 1149–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Peng Y, Kang Q, Luo Q, et al Inhibitor of DNA binding/differentiation helix‐loop‐helix proteins mediate bone morphogenetic protein‐induced osteoblast differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 32941–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Sharff KA, Song WX, Luo X, et al Hey1 Basic Helix‐Loop‐Helix Protein Plays an Important Role in Mediating BMP9‐induced Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284: 649–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Tang QQ, Otto TC, Lane MD. Commitment of C3H10T1/2 pluripotent stem cells to the adipocyte lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101: 9607–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Zhang X, Kuroda S, Carpenter D, et al Craniosynostosis in transgenic mice overexpressing Nell‐1. J Clin Invest. 2002; 110: 861–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Desai J, Shannon ME, Johnson MD, et al Nell1‐deficient mice have reduced expression of extracellular matrix proteins causing cranial and vertebral defects. Hum Mol Genet. 2006; 15: 1329–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Ye J, Wang J, Zhu Y, et al A thermoresponsive polydiolcitrate‐gelatin scaffold and delivery system mediates effective bone formation from BMP9‐transduced mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Mater. 2016; 11: 025021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Wagner W, Wein F, Seckinger A, et al Comparative characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord blood. Exp Hematol. 2005; 33: 1402–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Ting K, Vastardis H, Mulliken JB, et al Human NELL‐1 expressed in unilateral coronal synostosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1999; 14: 80–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Zhang X, Ting K, Bessette CM, et al Nell‐1, a key functional mediator of Runx2, partially rescues calvarial defects in Runx2(+/‐) mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2011; 26: 777–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Wang J, Zhang H, Zhang W, et al Bone Morphogenetic Protein‐9 (BMP9) Effectively Induces Osteo/Odontoblastic Differentiation of the Reversibly Immortalized Stem Cells of Dental Apical Papilla. Stem Cells Dev. 2014; 23: 1405–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Bi Y, Huang J, He Y, et al Wnt antagonist SFRP3 inhibits the differentiation of mouse hepatic progenitor cells. J Cell Biochem. 2009; 108: 295–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Shenaq DS, Teven CM, Seitz IA, et al Characterization of Reversibly Immortalized Calvarial Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells. J Craniofac Surg. 2015; 26: 1207–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. vom Brocke J, Schmeiser HH, Reinbold M, et al MEF immortalization to investigate the ins and outs of mutagenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2006; 27: 2141–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Nitta M, Katabuchi H, Ohtake H, et al Characterization and tumorigenicity of human ovarian surface epithelial cells immortalized by SV40 large T antigen. Gynecol Oncol. 2001; 81: 10–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Counter CM, Hahn WC, Wei W, et al Dissociation among in vitro telomerase activity, telomere maintenance, and cellular immortalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998; 95: 14723–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.