Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 30;4(5):ENEURO.0012-17.2017. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0012-17.2017

Table 3.

Algorithm success rate on manually labeled dataset

Success rate (%) Precision (%) Recall (%)
ABLE 67.5 67.5 67.5
CNMF 63.4 60.7 66.5
Suite2p 63.7 56.5 73.1

On a manually labeled dataset from the Neurofinder Challenge, we compare the performance of three segmentation algorithms: ABLE, CNMF (Pnevmatikakis et al., 2016), and Suite2p (Pachitariu et al., 2016), using the manual labels as ground truth.