Abstract
The inhibitory effect of immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM)-containing adapters DAP12 and FcεRI γ-chain (FcRγ) has been found in many immune functions. Herein, we have further explored the role of these adapters in C-type lectin receptors response. We identified that FcRγ, but not DAP12, could negatively regulate the Dectin-1 responses in dendritic cells (DCs). Loss of FcRγ or both DAP12 and FcRγ enhanced the maturation and cytokine production in DCs upon Dectin-1 activation compared to normal cells, whereas DCs lacking only DAP12 showed little changes. In addition, increments of T cell activation and T helper 17 polarization induced by FcRγ-deficient DCs were observed both in vitro and in vivo. Examining the Dectin-1 signaling, we revealed that the activations of several signaling molecules were augmented in FcRγ-deficient DCs stimulated with Dectin-1 ligands. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the association of phosphatases SHP-1 and PTEN with FcRγ may contribute to the negative regulation of FcRγ in Dectin-1 activation in DCs. These results extend the inhibitory effect of ITAM-containing adapters to Dectin-1 response in immune functions, even though Dectin-1 contains an ITAM-like intracellular domain. According to the role of Dectin-1 in responding to microbes and tumor cells, our finding may have applications in the development of vaccine and cancer therapy.
Keywords: FcεRI γ-chain, DAP12, dendritic cell, Dectin-1, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif, SHP-1, PTEN
Introduction
Dendritic cells (DCs) monitor danger signals in surrounding environment, capture and process antigens, migrate to secondary lymphoid organs, and activate T cells to initiate immune responses (1). DCs are heterogenous but all subsets have intrinsic and cooperative immunoregulatory functions (2). They can direct immune responses either toward to tolerance or inflammatory reactions, which include cellular and humoral immune responses (3, 4). DCs become mature when they encounter pathogen-associated molecules or inflammatory mediators, a key step to determine what function they exert (5). Thus, DCs are provided with diverse receptors that sense microbial components and trigger host responses to invading pathogens. These receptors, known as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), include toll-like receptors (TLRs), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs), and RIG-like receptors (RLRs) (6). All PRRs activate specific signaling pathways that lead to expression of genes and tailor immune responses to particular microbes.
CLRs recognize carbohydrate structures present on the pathogens (7). Dectin-1 is a group V CLR possessing a single extracellular carbohydrate-recognition domain (CRD) and a cytoplasmic tail containing an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM)-like domain (8). Dectin-1 is expressed on myeloid cells, including macrophages, DCs, and neutrophils, and is dedicated to the recognition of β-1,3-glucans, which make up to 50% of the fungal cell wall, and is the major receptor for these carbohydrates on leukocytes (9). Upon binding of β-glucan ligands to Dectin-1, the cytoplasmic ITAM-like motif (hemITAM) is able to mediate intracellular signaling and induces a variety of cellular responses. This results in recruitment of spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) and caspase recruitment domain protein 9 (CARD9), and then induces DC maturation and guides T helper 17 (Th17) differentiation (10). In addition, Src, AKT, PLCγ, and MAPKs are also involved in Dectin-1 signaling pathway. Dectin-1 can recognize a wide variety of fungal species and Dectin-1-deficient mice are susceptible to Candida albicans infection, indicating a role for Dectin-1 in antifungal immunity (11). Furthermore, Chiba et al. reported that the recognition of tumor cells by Dectin-1 critically contributes to the antitumor immune responses, implying the applicability of Dectin-1 in cancer therapy (12).
ITAM is critical in signal transduction not only for activation but also inhibition in hematopoietic cells (13, 14). Besides, the ITAM-associated receptors cross talk with other signaling pathways and either augment or dampen these signals (15, 16). Two ITAM-containing adapters, DAP12 (TYROBP) and FcεRI γ-chain (FcRγ), have been identified in myeloid cells and NK cells. DAP12 is a disulfide-bonded homodimer and associates with various activating receptors through its negatively charged aspartic residue present in the transmembrane domain and non-covalently binds to a positively charged amino acid present in the transmembrane of the activating receptor (17). FcRγ is structurally similar to DAP12 but mainly shared by all activating multi-chain Fc receptors (FcRs). FcRs contain a ligand-binding subunit (FcRα) with different extracellular domains, which are the core structure of receptors for IgA (FcαR), IgG (FcγR and FcRn), and IgE (FcεR), and one or two ITAM-containing signaling subunits (FcRγ and FcRβ) shared by multisubunit FcRs (18). Recently, receptors associated with these adapters have been implicated in inhibition of cellular activation, and several models have been proposed (19, 20). In a previous study, we have identified the negative regulation of DAP12 in TLR responses in macrophages (21). Following this finding, we reported that both DAP12 and FcRγ are required for the inhibitory effect on TLR responses in DCs (22). Since DCs are equipped with many types of PRRs, we further examined the regulatory roles of DAP12 and FcRγ in other PRR responses.
Dectin-1 contains a hemITAM for signaling, so the ITAM-containing adapters DAP12 and FcRγ are likely not required for Dectin-1 activation; however, no prior studies have addressed the effect of DAP12 and FcRγ on Dectin-1 response. Here, we explore the involvement of these adapters in Dectin-1 activation by using gene-deficient mice and surprisingly found that FcRγ negatively modulates Dectin-1 responses in DCs.
Materials and Methods
Mice and DC/Macrophage Cultures
As previously described (22), bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDCs) were generated from C57BL/6 (National Laboratory Animal Center, Taipei, Taiwan), Tyrobp−/−, Fcer1g−/−, and Tyrobp−/−Fcer1g−/− mice. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) were prepared from C57BL/6 and Fcer1g−/− mice. In brief, isolated BM cells were cultured in plates with RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS and 10 ng/mL recombinant mouse GM-CSF (315-05, Peprotech) for BMDCs or 10 ng/mL recombinant mouse M-CSF (400-28, Peprotech) for BMDMs. At days 3 and 5, fresh medium containing 10 ng/mL GM-CSF or M-CSF were added into plates. At day 7, non-attached GM-CSF-cultured cells (>80% CD11c+ cells) were collected and used for BMDC experiments and attached M-CSF-cultured cells were collected by scraping and used for BMDM experiments.
DC/Macropgahe Maturation and Cytokine Production
For DC/macrophage maturation, we followed a previously discribed protocol (23) in which cultured DCs/macrophages were treated with curdlan (10 µg/mL, Wako), depleted zymosan (dZym) (10 µg/mL, tlrl-dzn, InvivoGen), or LPS (100 ng/mL, Sigma) at the indicated concentration on day 6. For phosphatase inhibitor treatment, sodium stibogluconate (SS, SHP-1 inhibitor, #567565, Millipore) and SF1670 (PTEN inhibitor, ab141303, Abcam) were incubated for 1 h before Dectin-1 ligand stimulation. After 16 h, the cells were stained with antibodies (Abs) against CD11c (11-0114), CD40 (17-0401), CD80 (12-0801), CD86 (12-0862), and MHC-II (17-5320, all from eBioscience) and analyzed by flow cytometry. For surface expression, 6-day-cultured DCs were stained with Dectin-1 (MCA2289) and Dectin-2 (MCA2415, all from Serotec) for flow cytometry. For cytokine production by DCs, supernatants were collected from BMDC cultures after treatment of curdlan or dZym for 16 h. The secreted cytokines were measured by ELISA kits for IL-2 (88-7024), IL-6 (88-7064), IL-10 (88-7105), and IL-23 (88-7230, all from eBioscience).
DC Migration
To analyze the migration of DCs, we used chemotaxis assays in transwell chambers as described previously (24). Briefly, BMDCs were treated with curdlan or dZym (10 µg/mL) on day 6, harvested after 16 h, and then seeded in the upper wells of Transwell chambers (pore size, 5 mm; Costar Corning). Culture media without or with CCL21 (200 ng/mL, 250-13, Peprotech) were loaded in the lower wells. After 3 h, the migrated cells in the lower well were collected, stained with anti-CD11c Ab, and then analyzed by flow cytometry.
Real-time PCR for CCR7 Expression
BM DCs were collected at day 6, treated with dZym (10 µg/mL), and then harvested at the indicated time points. The total RNAs were extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and converted to cDNA by Revert Aid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. SYBR Green real-time PCR was performed with Luminaris Color HiGreen qPCR master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) by PikoReal System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The primers for CCR7 (forward: 5′-AGA GGC TCA AGA CCA TGA CGG A-3′; reverse: 5′-TCC AGG ACT TGG CTT CGC TGT A-3′) and GAPDH (forward: 5′-GAC AAC TTT GGC ATT GTG G-3′; reverse: 5′-ATG CAG GGA TGA TGT TCT G-3′) were used. All mRNA levels of CCR7 were normalized with GAPDH and the fold-change represented the CCR7 expression of dZym-treated BMDCs compared to that of untreated cells.
Antigen-Specific T Cell Responses
To determine the DC-induced antigen-specific T cell responses, we performed the DC and OT-II T cell coculture in vitro (24). Briefly, BMDCs were treated with OVA323–339 peptide (10 µg/mL, O1641, Sigma-Aldrich) for 3 h, and then CD4+ T cells, which were isolated from OT-II mice by negative selection kits (480005, Biolegend), were added into BMDC cultures at indicated ratio. For proliferation assay, cells were pulsed with [3H]thymidine and harvested after 72 h. The proliferation of OT-II T cells was determined by the radioactivity of [3H] thymidine incorporation. For detection of IL-17 production, supernatants were collected from DC/OT-II T cell cultures after 4 days. The amounts of IL-17 were measured by ELISA. For recall assay in vivo, C57BL/6 and FcRγ-deficient mice were immunized with OVA (50 µg, A2512, Sigma-Aldrich) and incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (AR002, Sigma-Aldrich) mixed with or without curdlan/dZym (200 µg) via footpads. After 7 days, inguinal and popliteal lymph node (LN) cells were isolated and the numbers of CD3+ T lymphocyte were determined by counting and flow cytometry. For recall response measurement ex vivo, total LN cells were seeded in 96-well plate (5 × 105/well) and incubated with OVA at indicated concentrations for 3 days. [3H] thymidine was added 12 h before cell harvest. The proliferation of OVA-specific T cells was measured by [3H] thymidine incorporation.
Western Blot
BM DCs were collected from cultures on day 6, washed with PBS, and incubated in serum-free RPMI for starvation. After 3 h, the cells were stimulated with curdlan or dZym (50 µg/mL) and harvested at indicated time points. Then, the cell lysis buffer PhosphoSafe Extraction Reagent (71296, Novagen) was added to the cells and the lysates were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). When the proteins were transferred from gels to PVDF membranes, the membranes were blocked with PBS containing 5% non-fat milk and the activation of signaling molecules were detected by specific Abs, including anti-phospho (p)-Src (07-909, Millipore), -Src (#2109), -p-Syk (#2701), -Syk (#2712), -p-Akt (Thr308, #9275), -Akt (#9272), -p-PLCγ (#2821), -PLCγ (#2822), -p-ERK (Thr202/Tyr204, #9101, all from Cell Signaling), -ERK (MAB1230, R&D), -p-p38 (Thr180/Tyr182, #9211), -p38 (#9212, all from Cell Signaling), -p-c-Raf (Ser338, #05-538, Millipore), c-Raf (#07-396, Upstate), -FcRγ (06-727, Millipore), -actin (sc-47778, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), -IκBα (#9242, Cell Signaling), and -GAPDH (#MAB374, Millipore). The HRP-conjugated antirabbit IgG (111-035-144) and antimouse IgG (115-035-003, Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories) were used for secondary Abs. The signals were developed by ECL system (Advansta) and exposed on X-ray film (Fuji). Quantification was determined by densitometry using ImageJ software (US National Institutes of Health) and the number represented the fold of each (phosphoprotein/total protein) value normalized to the (phosphoprotein/total protein) value of untreated WT control (WT 0 min).
Immunoprecipitation
WT BMDCs were collected from cultures on day 6, treated with curdlan or dZym (50 µg/mL), and then harvested at indicated time points. Cells were lysed and the lysates were precleared with protein A/G beads (G-Bioscience) at 4°C for 2 h. After removing the beads, the lysates were incubated with anti-FcRγ Ab (06-727, Millipore) at 4°C for 16 h and then protein A/G beads were added for precipitating Ab-conjugated proteins. After 2 h, the precipitated proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and then evaluated by Western blot using anti-SHP-1 (#3759), -SHP-2 (#3397), -SHIP-1 (#2728, all from Cell Signaling), -FcRγ and -PTEN (04-409, Millipore), and -actin Abs. Quantification was determined by densitometry using ImageJ software.
Statistics
Significances of different Dectin-1 responses between WT and various DAP12- and FcRγ-deficient DCs were determined using a Student’s t-test with two-sample equal variance with a two-tailed distribution.
Results
Enhancement of Dectin-1-Mediated Maturation in Fcer1g−/− DCs as well as Tyrobp−/−Fcer1g−/− DCs
We have demonstrated the enhanced TLR responses in Tyrobp−/−Fcer1g−/− BMDCs (22). This finding suggests that these ITAM-containing adapters participate in regulating innate immunity of DCs. A notable feature is that TLRs do not need an ITAM for their signaling. In contrast, a typical CLR, Dectin-1, contains a cytoplasmic hemITAM for initiating antifungus activities. Thus, it was interesting to know whether DAP12 and FcRγ have any role in the Dectin-1 responses. To study this hypothesis, we generated BMDCs from WT, Tyrobp−/−, Fcer1g−/−, and Tyrobp−/−Fcer1g−/− mice and treated these DCs with a Dectin-1-specific ligand curdlan. Because DC maturation is the key step for DC function, we firstly examined the maturation status of DCs following curdlan stimulation. As shown in Figure 1, the expression levels of MHC class II, CD40, CD80, and CD86 in Fcer1g−/− and Tyrobp−/−Fcer1g−/− DCs were clearly higher than that in WT and Tyrobp−/− DCs after curdlan treatment. Remarkably, the upregulated levels of maturation were similar between Fcer1g−/− and Tyrobp−/−Fcer1g−/− DCs, and the levels of Tyrobp−/− DCs were not significantly different from WT DCs (Figure 1). The data indicate a different requirement of these ITAM-containing adapters in Dectin-1 activation compared to TLRs in DCs and suggest that FcRγ, but not DAP12, plays a role in modulating Dectin-1-mediated DC maturation.
Promoted Cytokine Production by Fcer1g−/− DCs as well as Tyrobp−/−Fcer1g−/− DCs after Dectin-1 Activation
DCs produce various cytokines to induce adaptive immunity after Dectin-1 activation. To investigate whether the lack of DAP12 or FcRγ affects cytokine production by DCs, we measured the amount of various cytokines in WT, Tyrobp−/−, Fcer1g−/−, and Tyrobp−/−Fcer1g−/− BMDC cultures by ELISA after curdlan treatment. Similar to what was seen in Dectin-1-induced maturation, Fcer1g−/− and Tyrobp−/−Fcer1g−/− DCs had comparable IL-2, IL-6, and IL-23 production and their amounts were significantly higher than that in WT DCs after curdlan treatment. Again, DAP12 deficiency had no significant effect on Dectin-1-mediated cytokine production by DCs (Figure 2). These results show that only FcRγ participates in the negative regulation of cytokine production by DCs after Dectin-1 activation and support the conclusion that FcRγ exclusively inhibits Dectin-1-mediated activation.
Augmentation of Dectin-1 Responses in Fcer1g−/− DCs Was Not due to Quantity and Ligand Specificity of Dectin-1
We have identified the involvement of FcRγ, but not DAP12, in Dectin-1 responses in DCs. Then, we asked whether the augmentation of Dectin-1 responses in Fcer1g−/− DCs was determined by external factors. A possibility is that the higher expression of Dectin-1 on the surface of Fcer1g−/− DCs results in the increment of its responses. To test this hypothesis, we measured the surface expression of Dectin-1 in WT and Fcer1g−/− DCs by flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 3A, the expression level of Dectin-1 on Fcer1g−/− DCs was comparable to that on WT cells, excluding a quantitative effect of Dectin-1. Because FcRγ is required for the surface expression of Dectin-2, we simultaneously compared the Dectin-2 expression and confirmed the FcRγ deficiency in Fcer1g−/− DCs through the loss of Dectin-2 expression (Figure 3A). In addition, we also affirmed that FcRγ deficiency did not affect the DC phenotype in vitro as CD11b and CD11c expressions were similar between WT and FcRγ-deficient BMDCs (Figure 3B).
Next, we used another Dectin-1 ligand dZym to check whether the enhanced phenotypes of Fcer1g−/− DCs are ligand-specific. Consistent with the trend seen with curdlan stimulation, maturation (Figure 3C) and cytokine production (Figure 3D) were increased to a greater extent in the Fcer1g−/− DCs in comparison with WT DCs. We performed LPS stimulation as another quality control of DCs and also displayed the enhancing effects of FcRγ deficiency on LPS-induced DC maturation (Figure 3E) and IL-10 production (Figure 3F). Collectively, these results imply an intracellular modulation of FcRγ on the quality of Dectin-1 activation in DCs.
We have confirmed the negative regulation of FcRγ deficiency in DCs. It is interesting to know whether macrophages have the same phenotype. After stimulation, the Dectin-1- (Figure 4A) and LPS- (Figure 4B) induced maturation has no significant increase in FcRγ-deficient macrophages compared to WT cells, demonstrating that FcRγ may be not involved in modulating Dectin-1 responses in macrophages.
Loss of FcRγ Had No Effect on the Migration of Dectin-1-Activated DCs
Activated DCs upregulate CCR7 expression and migrate to CCL19/21-expressing draining LNs to initiate adaptive immune responses. Therefore, we studied the effect of FcRγ deficiency on the ability of DC migration after Dectin-1 activation by chemotaxis assays using transwell chambers. Unexpectedly, the CCL21-guiding migration of Fcer1g−/− DCs was not different from that of WT cells (Figure 5A). Because CCR7 is the receptor of CCL21 on DCs, we measured the CCR7 expression of DCs after dZym stimulation. Consistently, the mRNA levels of CCR7 in Fcer1g−/− DCs were similar to that in normal cells (Figure 5B). Thus, the FcRγ deficiency does not affect the CCR7 expression and migration of Dectin-1-activated DCs.
Antigen-Specific T Cell Responses Were Increased in Fcer1g−/− Mice
Following migration, the mature DCs induce antigen-specific T cell activation and proliferation in draining LNs. Thus, we determined the responses of antigen-specific T cell population in vitro and ex vivo. First, WT and Fcer1g−/− BMDC were cultured with OT-II T cells at different ratio and the proliferation of OT-II T cells were detected by [3H]thymidine incorporation after 3 days. As shown in Figure 6A, Fcer1g−/− BMDC could significantly induce more T cell proliferation than WT BMDC. In addition, higher production of IL-17 was detected in Fcer1g−/− BMDC/T cell cultures (Figure 6B). To further confirm the phenotype ex vivo, we did antigen-specific recall assay on WT and Fcer1g−/− mice to compare T cell proliferation. WT and Fcer1g−/− mice were immunized with OVA mixed with incomplete Freund’s Adjuvant plus curdlan or dZym via foot pads. After 7 days, draining LNs were collected and the number of T cell was calculated. Significantly, the size (data not shown) and number of T cells in draining LNs of Fcer1g−/− mice were greater than that in WT mice after immunization (Figure 6C). Furthermore, we measured OVA-specific T cell proliferation by adding OVA into the cultures of isolated LN cells for 72 h and counting incorporated [3H] thymidine. As shown in Figure 6D, the proliferation of OVA-specific T cells in Fcer1g−/− LN cells was more intense than that in WT cells. The elevated activation of OVA-specific T cells in immunized Fcer1g−/− mice could be due to the higher expression levels of MHC class II and costimulators in Dectin-1-activated Fcer1g−/− DCs (Figures 1 and 3C), and supported the conclusion that loss of FcRγ causes a relative promotion in DC activation by Dectin-1 stimulation.
Enhanced Dectin-1 Signaling in Fcer1g−/− DCs
We have confirmed the intracellular effect of FcRγ on Dectin-1 response in DCs (Figure 3A). To explore the mechanism, we examined the signaling events of Dectin-1 in DCs after Dectin-1 activation. According to previous research, Dectin-1 ligands treatment can induce both Syk-dependent and Syk-independent signaling activation. Thus, we compared the activation status of several molecules in both Dectin-1-mediated signaling between WT and Fcer1g−/− DCs by Western blot. The phosphorylation levels of Src, AKT, PLCγ, ERK, p38MAPK, and c-Raf were increased in Fcer1g−/− DCs compared to WT cells (Figure 7A). Moreover, IκB degradations were accelerated in Fcer1g−/− DCs compared to WT cells, represented the enhancement of NF-κB activation (Figure 7B). The blotting data strongly suggest that FcRγ suppresses the Dectin-1 signaling and then reduces the Dectin-1 responses in DCs. However, the phosphorylation levels of Syk were not significantly different between WT and Fcer1g−/− DCs (Figure 7A).
Recruitment of Phosphatases by FcRγ after Dectin-1 Activation
The ITAM domain in the FcRγ has been shown to bind Src homology 2 (SH2)-containing protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) and inhibit cell activation (25, 26). Thus, we examined whether any SH2-containing PTP was recruited to FcRγ after Dectin-1 activation in DCs. FcRγ was immunoprecipitated after Dectin-1 ligand treatment, and then the possible PTPs, including SH2 domain-containing phosphatase-1 (SHP-1), SHP-2, SH2 domain-containing inositol 5′-phosphatase-1 (SHIP-1), were determined by Western blot. As shown in Figure 8A, SHP-1 and SHP-2 were present in the FcRγ immunoprecipitate. However, SHIP-1 was absent. Because the enhanced AKT activation was observed in Fcer1g−/− DCs after Dectin-1 activation (Figure 7A), we were guided to examine the phosphoinositide phosphatase PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog), which is a suppressor for AKT activation (27), and surprisingly found the presence of PTEN in FcRγ immunoprecipitate (Figure 8A). The results illustrate that SHP-1, SHP-2, and PTEN are recruited to FcRγ after Dectin-1 activation and probably involved in the negative modulation of FcRγ to Dectin-1 responses in DCs.
In order to support the potential functional implication of these phosphatases in the suppressive effects, we treated WT DCs with chemical inhibitors to examine whether the inhibitory effect could be reverted. It has been reported that SHP-2 can positively regulate Dectin-1-induced activation in response to fungal infection (28). Thus, we focused on SHP-1 and PTEN. As shown in Figure 8B, when we used specific inhibitors SS (for SHP-1) and SF1670 (for PTEN) for blocking phosphatase activities, both SS- and SF1670-treated BMDCs expressed higher level of CD80, CD86 and MHC-II after dZym treatment. These results confirmed that SHP-1 and PTEN could be involved in the negative regulation of FcRγ in Dectin-1 responses.
Discussion
The inhibitory effects of ITAM-containing adapters DAP12 and FcRγ have been elucidated in myeloid cells (13). In a previous study, we identified that both DAP12 and FcRγ are required for inhibition of TLR responses in DCs (22). Because ITAM is not involved in TLR signaling, we then examined the effect of DAP12 and FcRγ on Dectin-1, which contains a hemITAM, in this study. We surprisingly found that Fcer1g−/− and Tyrobp−/−Fcer1g−/− DCs, but not Tyrobp−/− DCs, showed similar hyper-responsive phenotypes, suggesting that only FcRγ plays a role in negatively regulating Dectin-1 responses in DCs. Consistently, we have observed that FcRγ most likely plays a more important role than DAP12 in some TLR activities in DCs (22). Although some activation markers already increased basally in the absence of FcRγ (Figures 1 and 3C,D), probably due to another ligand with another signaling pathway that is present in those culture conditions, the enhancement of Dectin-1 responses was really significant in Fcer1g−/− DCs both in vitro and in vivo. In contrast, the Dectin-1 responses of WT and Fcer1g−/− BM-derived macrophages were not different (Figure 4). Although the requirement of DAP12 and FcRγ for negative regulation is probably dependent on the types of cell or receptor, it seems that FcRγ is more influential than DAP12 in DCs, comparing to macrophages in which DAP12 is more important than FcRγ (21). A possibility is that the profiles of DAP12- and FcRγ-associated receptors recruited by TLR and Dectin-1 ligands are different between DC and macrophage. Further studies are required to identify the “co-receptors” in these myeloid cells.
The ITAM has been characterized in many immune receptors for initiating signal transduction. However, increasing evidences establish its negative role in immune responses. Our group first reported enhanced TLR responses in DAP12-deficient macrophages (21), and both DAP12 and FcRγ are required for the enhancement of TLR responses in DCs (22). Subsequently, the DAP12-associated triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell-2 (TREM-2) was also reported to negatively regulate TLR responses in DCs (29). In addition, ITAM-associated receptors inhibit type I IFN (IFN-α/β) signaling in primary human macrophages (30). Suppression by ITAMs has also been found in lymphocytes. CD79a and CD79b ITAMs mediate an inhibitory signaling cascade required for B cell anergy (31). In vivo, Gmyrek et al. show that mice lacking both DAP12 and FcRγ possess a greatly enhanced monocyte-derived DC differentiation, IL-12 production, and CD8 T cell responses (32). A well-characterized function of ITAM is the inhibitory effect of the IgA receptor FcαRI. Monomeric IgA binds to FcαRI and results in partial phosphorylation of its FcRγ, which then attenuates immune activation (20). Our study identifies a new target modulated by ITAM in immune responses.
An interesting question is how the FcRγ affects the “non-adapter-associated receptor” Dectin-1 in DCs. Bezbradica and Medzhitov have suggested that many immunoreceptors, all of which use a conserved ITAM-module for their signaling, can couple with members of additional classes of membrane receptors to deliver unique signal(s) to the cell (16). In studies of FcRγ, many reports have documented the inhibitory effects of FcRγ-associated FcRs. Monovalent targeting of FcαRI triggers inhibitory ITAM (ITAMi) signaling through the associated FcR γ chain (33). In addition, FcγRI engaged with immune complexes reduces the production of IFN-β and TLR4 signaling and increases the secretion of IL-10 (34). Another FcR, FcγRIIA, can ameliorate inflammation by engagement with anti-FcγRII F(ab′)2 fragments or intravenous hIgG (IVIg) treatment (35). Recently, the macrophage inducible C-type lectin (Mincle) has been found to form a complex with macrophage C-type lectin and FcRγ (36) and is a fungal receptor that can suppress Dectin-1-induced antifungal immunity (37) and Fonsecaea pedrosoi-induced Th17-cell differentiation in mice (38). Mincle can also be shifted to an ITAMi configuration by Leishmania and then impairs DC activation (39). Thus, we proposed a model that an FcRγ-associated receptor might couple with Dectin-1 after curdlan or dZym treatment, and then SHP-1 and PTEN were recruited by FcRγ to modulate Dectin-1 signaling. However, we did not know what the Dectin-1-coupled FcRγ-associated receptor is. Future studies would explore whether Mincle, a possible candidate, could be recruited to Dectin-1 after curdlan/dZym treatment in DCs in the future.
We have confirmed that the inhibitory effect of FcRγ is due to modulation of Dectin-1 signaling but not reduction of Dectin-1 expression. The activities of several molecules in Dectin-1 signaling were enhanced in FcRγ-deficient DCs, including Src, AKT, PLCγ, ERK, p38MAPK, c-Raf, and NF-κB (Figure 7). Interestingly, the FcRγ deficiency did not significantly affect the Syk activation (Figure 7A). It has been shown that Syk is required for Mincle-FcRγ-dependent inhibitory axis during Leishmania infection (39), implying that Syk could also be activated by FcRγ-mediated suppression after Dectin-1 stimulation. Although Syk activation was not increased in FcRγ-deficient DCs, probably due to the saturated activity after curdlan/dZym treatment, the entire activation might only trigger Dectin-1 signaling without shared by FcRγ-mediated negative signaling and resulted in the enhancement of Dectin-1 downstream signaling. In addition to these signal molecules, the transcription factor IRF5-mediated Dectin-1-induced IFN-β production by renal DCs is crucial for defense against C. albicans infection (40). However, we did not see the effect of FcRγ deficiency on IRF5 activation and IFN-β production after Dectin-1 activation (data not shown).
What is the mechanism for suppressing Dectin-1 activation by FcRγ in DCs? It has been shown that low avidity ligation of FcαRI induces the translocation of FcαRI associated with SHP-1 to membrane lipid rafts. Subsequent ligation of activating receptors results in their colocalization with FcαRI and SHP-1, and then SHP-1 exerts cell inhibition of multiple types of activation signals (25). A recent study also described that Leishmania triggers a Mincle-dependent inhibitory axis characterized by SHP-1 coupling to the FcRγ chain (39). We did observe the association of SHP-1 with FcRγ after Dectin-1 activation (Figure 8), although the indirect association could also be possible. In addition, we detected the binding of SHP-2 to FcRγ. However, SHP-2 has been reported to positively regulate Dectin-1-induced activation in response to fungal infection (28). Thus, the recruitment of SHP-2 may be irrelevant to the negative modulation of FcRγ here. In another study, the adaptor protein downstream of kinase 3 (DOK3) has been found to physically associate with the ITAM of DAP12 through its phosphotyrosine-binding domain and mediate the mitigation of LPS signaling in macrophages (41). It remains to be determined whether DOK3 is associated with FcRγ in Dectin-1 responses in DCs.
In this study, we reported for the first time that PTEN was recruited to FcRγ after Dectin-1 activation (Figure 8). Although we could not exclude the indirect binding of PTEN to FcRγ, PTEN has been identified as a negative regulator of FcR signaling, an ITAM-based signaling event. For examples, PTEN abrogates FcγR-mediated phagocytosis (42, 43), and the suppression of PTEN is critical for mast cell homeostasis and FcεRI-responsiveness (44). Notably, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) enhances SHP-1 activity, resulting in increased PTEN activity. This mechanism contributes to the ability of PGE2 to abolish innate immune signaling in primary macrophages (45) and probably provides an explanation for our results (Figure 8). Serezani et al. report that PTEN is a key regulator in PGE2-mediated inhibition of phagocytosis of C. albicans (46), in agreement with our finding that FcRγ-associated PTEN might contribute to the negative regulation of antifungal responses. In addition, PTEN is responsible for the impairment of DC functions from elderly humans (47) and attenuates engulfment of apoptotic cells and apoptotic cell-induced anti-inflammatory response (48). It would be interesting to know whether PTEN-associated FcRγ also has such functions in DCs.
In the research of tumor immunology, Dectin-1 expressed on DCs and macrophages is critical to NK-mediated killing of tumor cells (12). Elucidating the molecular mechanism of Dectin-1-induced signaling in immune cells is essential for the design of new therapeutic strategies against cancer (49). Recently, soluble β-glucan has been reported to induce tumor regression in synergy with TLR9 agonist via DC-mediated immunity (50). In addition, curdlan has been reported to activate DCs through Dectin-1 and TLR4 signaling and the combination of curdlan and DCs efficiently inhibit tumor growth in mice (51). Our findings about the enhancement of TLR (22) and Dectin-1 (here) responses in FcRγ-deficient DCs may be applicable in promoting these treatments. Remarkably, Zhao et al. illustrate that immunization of tumor-bearing mice with Dectin-1-activated DCs induces potent antitumor response, due to Dectin-1-activated DCs as a powerful inducer of Th9 cells and antitumor immunity (52). It could be expected that the loss of FcRγ may facilitate Th9 differentiation by Dectin-1-activated DCs because of the enhanced Dectin-1 signaling.
In summary, we show here that FcRγ has inhibitory effects on Dectin-1 responses in DCs. Dectin-1 signaling is a key regulator of DC function in antifungal immune responses. In addition to antimicrobial host defense, Dectin-1 also plays roles in homeostasis, autoimmunity, allergy, and the recognition and response to dead and cancer cells (7). Our finding suggests that fungi and cancer cells could probably use such FcRγ-mediated negative regulation to escape the Dectin-1-induced immune responses. Thus, FcRγ could be an ideal target for strengthening the function of Dectin-1-activated DCs. Interestingly, it has been shown to improve the potency of a DC-based tumor vaccine with a small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting PTEN (53). Therefore, removing the FcRγ-mediated inhibition of Dectin-1 signaling by siRNA, or by CRISPR technology (54), might promote immunity and potentially could be applied to vaccine development and cancer therapy.
Ethics Statement
All mice were housed in the barrier facility in College of Medicine, National Taiwan University (Taiwan) under an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved protocol (Permit Number: 20110432). All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Experimental Animal Research Laboratory of the National Laboratory Animal Center, Taiwan. We did our best to minimize suffering during the animal experiments.
Author Contributions
Y-GP, Y-LY, and C-CL performed experiments. LLL contributed materials and edited manuscript. C-LC designed experiments and prepared the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank Professor Yu-sun Chang, Mr. Chun-Nan OuYang (Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan), Professor Betty Wu-Hsieh (National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan), and Professor Ann Chen (National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan) for technical helps. We are also grateful to Professor Clifford Lowell (UCSF, CA, USA) for providing materials.
Footnotes
Funding. This work was supported by MOST of Taiwan under Grant NSC1012320B002023MY3 and part of Grant MOST1042320B002050.
References
- 1.Steinman RM. Decisions about dendritic cells: past, present, and future. Annu Rev Immunol (2011) 30:1–22. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-100311-102839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schraml BU, Reis e Sousa C. Defining dendritic cells. Curr Opin Immunol (2015) 32:13–20. 10.1016/j.coi.2014.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Osorio F, Fuentes C, Lopez MN, Salazar-Onfray F, Gonzalez FE. Role of dendritic cells in the induction of lymphocyte tolerance. Front Immunol (2015) 6:535. 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rescigno M. Dendritic cell functions: learning from microbial evasion strategies. Semin Immunol (2015) 27:119–24. 10.1016/j.smim.2015.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pulendran B. The varieties of immunological experience: of pathogens, stress, and dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol (2015) 33:563–606. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cao X. Self-regulation and cross-regulation of pattern-recognition receptor signalling in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol (2016) 16:35–50. 10.1038/nri.2015.8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dambuza IM, Brown GD. C-type lectins in immunity: recent developments. Curr Opin Immunol (2015) 32:21–7. 10.1016/j.coi.2014.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee DH, Kim HW. Innate immunity induced by fungal beta-glucans via Dectin-1 signaling pathway. Int J Med Mushrooms (2014) 16:1–16. 10.1615/IntJMedMushr.v16.i1.10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Legentil L, Paris F, Ballet C, Trouvelot S, Daire X, Vetvicka V, et al. Molecular interactions of beta-(1 – >3)-glucans with their receptors. Molecules (2015) 20:9745–66. 10.3390/molecules20069745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Brown GD, Crocker PR. Lectin receptors expressed on myeloid cells. Microbiol Spectr (2016) 4(5):1–26. 10.1128/microbiolspec.MCHD-0036-2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Drummond RA, Gaffen SL, Hise AG, Brown GD. Innate defense against fungal pathogens. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med (2015) 5:a019620. 10.1101/cshperspect.a019620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chiba S, Ikushima H, Ueki H, Yanai H, Kimura Y, Hangai S, et al. Recognition of tumor cells by Dectin-1 orchestrates innate immune cells for anti-tumor responses. Elife (2014) 3:e04177. 10.7554/eLife.04177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hamerman JA, Ni M, Killebrew JR, Chu CL, Lowell CA. The expanding roles of ITAM adapters FcRgamma and DAP12 in myeloid cells. Immunol Rev (2009) 232:42–58. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00841.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lee RH, Bergmeier W. Platelet immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) and hemITAM signaling and vascular integrity in inflammation and development. J Thromb Haemost (2016) 14:645–54. 10.1111/jth.13250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ivashkiv LB. Cross-regulation of signaling by ITAM-associated receptors. Nat Immunol (2009) 10:340–7. 10.1038/ni.1706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bezbradica JS, Medzhitov R. Role of ITAM signaling module in signal integration. Curr Opin Immunol (2012) 24:58–66. 10.1016/j.coi.2011.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Takaki R, Watson SR, Lanier LL. DAP12: an adapter protein with dual functionality. Immunol Rev (2006) 214:118–29. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2006.00466.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Daeron M. Fc receptors as adaptive immunoreceptors. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol (2014) 382:131–64. 10.1007/978-3-319-07911-0_7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lowell CA. Src-family and Syk kinases in activating and inhibitory pathways in innate immune cells: signaling cross talk. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (2011) 3:a002352. 10.1101/cshperspect.a002352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mkaddem SB, Christou I, Rossato E, Berthelot L, Lehuen A, Monteiro RC. IgA, IgA receptors, and their anti-inflammatory properties. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol (2014) 382:221–35. 10.1007/978-3-319-07911-0_10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hamerman JA, Tchao NK, Lowell CA, Lanier LL. Enhanced toll-like receptor responses in the absence of signaling adaptor DAP12. Nat Immunol (2005) 6:579–86. 10.1038/ni1204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chu CL, Yu YL, Shen KY, Lowell CA, Lanier LL, Hamerman JA. Increased TLR responses in dendritic cells lacking the ITAM-containing adapters DAP12 and FcRgamma. Eur J Immunol (2008) 38:166–73. 10.1002/eji.200737600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yu YL, Chen IH, Shen KY, Huang RY, Wang WR, Chou CJ, et al. A triterpenoid methyl antcinate K isolated from Antrodia cinnamomea promotes dendritic cell activation and Th2 differentiation. Eur J Immunol (2009) 39:2482–91. 10.1002/eji.200839039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Huang RY, Yu YL, Cheng WC, Ouyang CN, Fu E, Chu CL. Immunosuppressive effect of quercetin on dendritic cell activation and function. J Immunol (2010) 184:6815–21. 10.4049/jimmunol.0903991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ivashkiv LB. How ITAMs inhibit signaling. Sci Signal (2011) 4:e20. 10.1126/scisignal.2001917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Iborra S, Sancho D. Signalling versatility following self and non-self sensing by myeloid C-type lectin receptors. Immunobiology (2015) 220:175–84. 10.1016/j.imbio.2014.09.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mak LH, Woscholski R. Targeting PTEN using small molecule inhibitors. Methods (2015) 77-78:63–8. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Deng Z, Ma S, Zhou H, Zang A, Fang Y, Li T, et al. Tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 mediates C-type lectin receptor-induced activation of the kinase Syk and anti-fungal TH17 responses. Nat Immunol (2015) 16:642–52. 10.1038/ni.3155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ito H, Hamerman JA. TREM-2, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell-2, negatively regulates TLR responses in dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol (2012) 42:176–85. 10.1002/eji.201141679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huynh L, Wang L, Shi C, Park-Min KH, Ivashkiv LB. ITAM-coupled receptors inhibit IFNAR signaling and alter macrophage responses to TLR4 and Listeria monocytogenes. J Immunol (2012) 188:3447–57. 10.4049/jimmunol.1102211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.O’Neill SK, Getahun A, Gauld SB, Merrell KT, Tamir I, Smith MJ, et al. Monophosphorylation of CD79a and CD79b ITAM motifs initiates a SHIP-1 phosphatase-mediated inhibitory signaling cascade required for B cell anergy. Immunity (2011) 35:746–56. 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.10.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gmyrek GB, Akilesh HM, Graham DB, Fuchs A, Yang L, Miller MJ, et al. Loss of DAP12 and FcRgamma drives exaggerated IL-12 production and CD8(+) T cell response by CCR2(+) Mo-DCs. PLoS One (2013) 8:e76145. 10.1371/journal.pone.0076145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ben Mkaddem S, Rossato E, Heming N, Monteiro RC. Anti-inflammatory role of the IgA Fc receptor (CD89): from autoimmunity to therapeutic perspectives. Autoimmun Rev (2013) 12:666–9. 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Swisher JF, Feldman GM. The many faces of FcgammaRI: implications for therapeutic antibody function. Immunol Rev (2015) 268:160–74. 10.1111/imr.12334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ben Mkaddem S, Hayem G, Jonsson F, Rossato E, Boedec E, Boussetta T, et al. Shifting FcgammaRIIA-ITAM from activation to inhibitory configuration ameliorates arthritis. J Clin Invest (2014) 124:3945–59. 10.1172/JCI74572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lobato-Pascual A, Saether PC, Fossum S, Dissen E, Daws MR. Mincle, the receptor for mycobacterial cord factor, forms a functional receptor complex with MCL and FcepsilonRI-gamma. Eur J Immunol (2013) 43:3167–74. 10.1002/eji.201343752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wevers BA, Kaptein TM, Zijlstra-Willems EM, Theelen B, Boekhout T, Geijtenbeek TB, et al. Fungal engagement of the C-type lectin Mincle suppresses Dectin-1-induced antifungal immunity. Cell Host Microbe (2014) 15:494–505. 10.1016/j.chom.2014.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wuthrich M, Wang H, Li M, Lerksuthirat T, Hardison SE, Brown GD, et al. Fonsecaea pedrosoi-induced Th17-cell differentiation in mice is fostered by Dectin-2 and suppressed by Mincle recognition. Eur J Immunol (2015) 45:2542–52. 10.1002/eji.201545591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Iborra S, Martinez-Lopez M, Cueto FJ, Conde-Garrosa R, Del Fresno C, Izquierdo HM, et al. Leishmania uses Mincle to target an inhibitory ITAM signaling pathway in dendritic cells that dampens adaptive immunity to infection. Immunity (2016) 45:788–801. 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.09.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.del Fresno C, Soulat D, Roth S, Blazek K, Udalova I, Sancho D, et al. Interferon-beta production via Dectin-1-Syk-IRF5 signaling in dendritic cells is crucial for immunity to C. albicans. Immunity (2013) 38:1176–86. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Peng Q, Long CL, Malhotra S, Humphrey MB. A physical interaction between the adaptor proteins DOK3 and DAP12 is required to inhibit lipopolysaccharide signaling in macrophages. Sci Signal (2013) 6:ra72. 10.1126/scisignal.2003801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kim JS, Peng X, De PK, Geahlen RL, Durden DL. PTEN controls immunoreceptor (immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif) signaling and the activation of Rac. Blood (2002) 99:694–7. 10.1182/blood.V99.2.694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cao X, Wei G, Fang H, Guo J, Weinstein M, Marsh CB, et al. The inositol 3-phosphatase PTEN negatively regulates Fc gamma receptor signaling, but supports toll-like receptor 4 signaling in murine peritoneal macrophages. J Immunol (2004) 172:4851–7. 10.4049/jimmunol.172.8.4851 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Furumoto Y, Brooks S, Olivera A, Takagi Y, Miyagishi M, Taira K, et al. Cutting edge: lentiviral short hairpin RNA silencing of PTEN in human mast cells reveals constitutive signals that promote cytokine secretion and cell survival. J Immunol (2006) 176:5167–71. 10.4049/jimmunol.176.9.5167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Canetti C, Serezani CH, Atrasz RG, White ES, Aronoff DM, Peters-Golden M. Activation of phosphatase and tensin homolog on chromosome 10 mediates the inhibition of FcgammaR phagocytosis by prostaglandin E2 in alveolar macrophages. J Immunol (2007) 179:8350–6. 10.4049/jimmunol.179.12.8350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Serezani CH, Kane S, Medeiros AI, Cornett AM, Kim SH, Marques MM, et al. PTEN directly activates the actin depolymerization factor cofilin-1 during PGE2-mediated inhibition of phagocytosis of fungi. Sci Signal (2012) 5:ra12. 10.1126/scisignal.2002448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Agrawal A, Agrawal S, Cao JN, Su H, Osann K, Gupta S. Altered innate immune functioning of dendritic cells in elderly humans: a role of phosphoinositide 3-kinase-signaling pathway. J Immunol (2007) 178:6912–22. 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.6912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mondal S, Ghosh-Roy S, Loison F, Li Y, Jia Y, Harris C, et al. PTEN negatively regulates engulfment of apoptotic cells by modulating activation of Rac GTPase. J Immunol (2011) 187:5783–94. 10.4049/jimmunol.1100484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Albeituni SH, Yan J. The effects of beta-glucans on dendritic cells and implications for cancer therapy. Anticancer Agents Med Chem (2013) 13:689–98. 10.2174/1871520611313050003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Masuda Y, Nawa D, Nakayama Y, Konishi M, Nanba H. Soluble beta-glucan from Grifola frondosa induces tumor regression in synergy with TLR9 agonist via dendritic cell-mediated immunity. J Leukoc Biol (2015) 98:1015–25. 10.1189/jlb.1A0814-415RR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kim HS, Park KH, Lee HK, Kim JS, Kim YG, Lee JH, et al. Curdlan activates dendritic cells through Dectin-1 and toll-like receptor 4 signaling. Int Immunopharmacol (2016) 39:71–8. 10.1016/j.intimp.2016.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhao Y, Chu X, Chen J, Wang Y, Gao S, Jiang Y, et al. Dectin-1-activated dendritic cells trigger potent antitumour immunity through the induction of Th9 cells. Nat Commun (2016) 7:12368. 10.1038/ncomms12368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kim JH, Kang TH, Noh KH, Kim SH, Lee YH, Kim KW, et al. Enhancement of DC vaccine potency by activating the PI3K/AKT pathway with a small interfering RNA targeting PTEN. Immunol Lett (2010) 134:47–54. 10.1016/j.imlet.2010.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Parnas O, Jovanovic M, Eisenhaure TM, Herbst RH, Dixit A, Ye CJ, et al. A genome-wide CRISPR screen in primary immune cells to dissect regulatory networks. Cell (2015) 162:675–86. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]