Abstract
Precision medicine is continuously demanding for novel point of care systems, potentially exploitable also for in-vivo analysis. Biosensing probes based on Lab-On-Fiber Technology have been recently developed to meet these challenges. However, devices exploiting standard label-free approaches (based on ligand/target molecule interaction) suffer from low sensitivity in all cases where the detection of small molecules at low concentrations is needed. Here we report on a platform developed through the combination of Lab-On-Fiber probes with microgels, which are directly integrated onto the resonant plasmonic nanostructure realized on the fiber tip. In response to binding events, the microgel network concentrates the target molecule and amplifies the optical response, leading to remarkable sensitivity enhancement. Moreover, by acting on the microgel degrees of freedom such as concentration and operating temperature, it is possible to control the limit of detection, tune the working range as well as the response time of the probe. These unique characteristics pave the way for advanced label-free biosensing platforms, suitably reconfigurable depending on the specific application.
Introduction
In biochemical sensing field, Lab-on -Fiber (LOF) based devices essentially consist on the combination of optical resonant nanostructures (typically patterned metallic slab supporting surface plasmon resonances (SPR)) and functional coating materials integrated on the optical fiber tip1–7. LOF technology is continuously leading to the development of novel biosensing probes with unique properties in term of size, weight and ease of interrogation4,5. In addition to point of care applications, LOF based devices seem to be particularly promising for in-vivo analysis systems, thanks to the intrinsic properties of optical fibers that make them easily integrable inside medical catheters or needles8. Typically, the working principle of LOF probes relies on the affinity interaction of a ligand attached to the sensor surface with the target molecule present in a liquid solution at a certain concentration. However, standard label-free approaches fail when target molecules are small, for example about a few hundreds of dalton. In that case, the ligand/analyte binding process produces a biological layer that is not thick enough for providing a local refractive index (RI) change that is optically detectable by the sensor. Analogous issues occur in such applications where the detection of larger analytes with very low limit of detection (LOD) is required. To enhance the sensitivity, gold and magnetic nanoparticles have been proposed as “molecular concentrators” able to localize multiple binding events on a single particle, and successively deliver target analyte from the solution to the sensor surface9–11. At the same time, approaches exploiting hydrogels (HGs) have been proposed12,13. HGs basically allow to: i) increase the analyte loading capacity by translating a conventional 2D interaction surface into a 3D volume interaction (thus favoring concentration effect), ii) amplify the signal transduction by changing the degree of HGs swelling due to detection/recognition events. HGs have been integrated both around14–16 and on top of optical fiber17–19. However, conventional HGs have limited utility in practical applications due to the fact that the rate of stimuli response is inversely proportional to the square of the size of the gel20. For this reason, in the last years, scientific community has focused the attention on microgels (MGs) i.e. colloidal HGs microsized particles with radius in the range between tens of nanometers and few microns21–27. The use of MGs is also advantageous when morphological or spatial control over the film is required, or when bulk polymerization approaches of HGs fail28. By exploiting combination of MGs with photonic chips, detection of pH29, glucose30, protein31 and specific DNA sequences32 have been reported.
In a pioneer study, we have proposed a biosensing platform consisting of a MGs layer baked by a metal nanostructure integrated on the optical fiber facet (see Fig. 1a)33,34. As case of study, for estimating the optical response amplification of the proposed device, a well-know benchmark for the class of small-molecules such as glucose has been used. In the wake of this proof of principle demonstration, here we exploit all the degrees of freedom offered by the combination of MGs with LOF optrode to tailor the sensing performances in terms of LOD, working range as well as response time. Specifically, we demonstrate that probes obtained with different MGs concentration exhibit different behaviors when interacting with target molecules. In particular, we find that, by selecting a suitable MGs concentration, it is possible to tune the probe sensitivity range and thus the LOD. We also study the impact of MGs parameters (in particular of the temperature) on the detection time response, which represents another important parameter of merit for biosensing applications. Competition and/or selectivity tests go beyond the scope of this work. Overall our results demonstrate that by combining LOF devices and MGs it is possible to develop advanced and flexible label-free fiber optic nanoprobes with exciting performances, particularly useful in the cases of small-molecule detection.
Methods
Materials
N-isopropylacrylamide, N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide (BIS, 99%), acrylic acid (AAc, 99%), ammonium persulfate (APS, 98%), α-D-glucose, and 3-amino phenyl boronic acid (APBA) hydrochloride (98%), Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid, sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) and sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochoride (EDC) and BupH 2-(Nmorpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES) buffered saline were purchased from Pierce through Thermo Scientific and used without further purification. All deionized water was obtained from a Milli-Q Plus system from Millipore.
LOF probe fabrication
A 35 nm thick Au film has been deposited by means of electron beam evaporation on the cleaved end of a standard single mode optical fiber (Corning SMF-28). A thin (~2 nm) chromium film has been used for improving adhesion. The square lattice of holes has been patterned on gold film by using the FEI Quanta 200 3D system. Beam currents and accelerating voltages have been set to 30 pA and 30 kV respectively.
MGs synthesis and functionalization
A 3-neck flask was equipped with a reflux condenser, nitrogen inlet, and temperature probe, and filled with a solution of NIPAm (11.1 mmol), BIS (0.652 mmol) and SDS (0.035 g) in 99 mL deionized water. The monomers solution was heated to 70 °C over ~1 hour and purged with N2. AAc (1,3 mmol) was then introduced in to heated reaction solution with a single injection step. A solution of APS (0,3 mmol) in 1 mL of deionized water was added to initiate the polymerization and the reaction was allowed to proceed at 70 °C for 4 hours under nitrogen. The MGs suspension was cooled overnight and then collected into rehydrated dialysis tubing (12–14k nominal MWCO) for purification. The tubes were immersed into a deionized water solution and for 15 days the water was changed 2x daily. The cleaned P(NIPAM-AAc) MGs were recombined and lyofilized.
MGs were functionalized with boronic moieties using APBA under EDC activation in pH 4,7 MES buffer according to the procedure described in ref.35 (see Supplementary Information, section S1).
Integration of MGs Film on the LOF probe
The fiber tip was immersed into 200 µL aliquot of MGs solution at concentration of 5%, 0.5%, 0.05% for 1 h, the film was then allowed to dry at 37 °C into an oven for 1 hour and soaked overnight at 30 °C in a deionized water bath. Finally, the deposited MGs film was dried in air. By controlling dipping and extraction speed, temperature solution, drying environment conditions (humidity and temperature), it is possible to achieve a good repeatability of the fabricated probes.
Concerning functionalization, the probes were placed in pH 4.7 MES buffered for 1 h at 4 °C into the refrigerator and a solution of 250 mM EDC and 125 mM APBA was added to the buffer. The reaction was allowed to proceed overnight at 4 °C. All samples were rinsed and soaked in deionized water for 2 days to remove any unreacted reagents.
Results and Discussion
LOF probe design and fabrication
The LOF probe consists of a gold layer integrated on the fiber tip and structured with a square lattice of holes in such a way to enhance extraordinary optical transmission (EOT) through the excitation of SPR, corresponding to a dip in the reflection spectrum36–38. The probe design is based on full wave simulations carried out by means of finite element method software (Comsol Multiphysics – RF module). Details on the numerical simulations can be found in the Supplementary Information (section S2). The lattice period a, the holes radius r and the gold layer thickness are 650 nm, 195 nm and 35 nm respectively. These parameters have been chosen in order (i) to set the resonance wavelength in the operating range of standard single mode fibers and (ii) to achieve a good compromise between resonance bandwidth and surface sensitivity. The device has been fabricated by means of a focused ion beam (FIB) milling process directly applied to the gold layer deposited on the fiber tip. Figure S3.2b shows the SEM image (top view) of the fabricated device. The experimental reflectance spectrum is shown in Fig. S3.2b (dashed red line) and it is in good agreement with the numerical prediction. A schematic and a description of the interrogation setup can be found in the Supplementary Information (section S3).
Microgels synthesis, functionalization and characterization
(pNIPAm-co-AAc) MGs were prepared by following a procedure defined in ref.39. Successively, for making MGs sensitive to glucose, they were functionalized with boronic moieties using APBA under EDC catalysis in pH 4,7 MES buffer35. Negative control samples were similarly prepared by using (pNIPAM-co-AAc) MGs treated with APBA only (without EDC) in pH 4.7 buffer. MGs were morphologically characterized by means of dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements which allow to determine their hydrodynamic radius (Rh) in buffer solution (see Supplementary Information, section S4).
Figure 2a shows the variations of Rh induced by temperature, before (red squares), after (black triangles) functionalization with APBA, and after glucose binding at 20 °C. The experimental uncertainties represent the standard error of the mean of 5 replicate runs. As shown in Fig. 2a (red squares curve), native (pNIPAM-co-AAc) MGs undergo sharp volume phase transition at ~32 °C, corresponding to the volume phase transition temperature (VPTT); at lower temperatures, (pNIPAM-co-AAc) MGs have Rh∼90 nm, that reduces down to ∼50 nm at high temperatures.
After modification with APBA (black triangles curve), (pNIPAM-APBA) MGs exhibit a VPTT of 17 °C, which is about 15 °C lower than that of the native (pNIPAM-co-AAc) MGs. The VPTT shift is due to the increase of the hydrophobic functionalities caused by the conjugation of the APBA to the native MGs35. Upon exposure to glucose solution, the (pNIPAM-APBA + 16 mM Glucose) curve (blue circles) moves towards higher temperature, exhibiting a VPTT of 35 °C. This shift is due to the formation of a glucose-boronate ester that makes the polymer more hydrophilic, thus influencing the glucose swelling response.
For evaluating the influence of MGs temperature, glucose binding experiments have been repeated at both 14 °C and 20 °C, corresponding to different MGs states, i.e. swollen and partially collapsed respectively. The results shown in Fig. 2b reveal a trade-off between achievable MGs size variation and response time. As mentioned above, glucose binding is expected to induce a MGs swelling (Fig. 1b). For maximizing the Rh variations, the buffer solution temperature should be kept at those values for which MGs are in the fully collapsed state. However, in the high temperature range, the hydrophobic interactions driving thermal gel collapse tend to prevail on the ionization driving force of glucose-induced swelling30–35. In fact, when MGs are not completely swollen (i.e. at 20 °C), Rh variations are maximum (ΔRh = ~90 nm); however, the partially collapsed state of the MGs makes the glucose molecules diffusion inside the polymeric network difficult, thus slowing down the response time. Clearly, an opposite situation occurs in the small temperature regime (T = 14 °C) where ΔRh and response time are found to be 65 nm and ~30 min respectively. The ΔRh values for the two temperatures are in line with the differences between (pNIPAM-APBA) MGs volume phase transition curves before and after exposure to 16 mM glucose concentration (Fig. 2a).
We have also analyzed, by means of DLS measurements, the relationship between the MGs concentration in solution and the detectable glucose concentrations. Results shown in Fig. 2c show that MGs at concentration of 0.1 mg/mL respond to a glucose concentration of 0.16 mM, and then they reach the saturation level. On the other hand, MGs at 1 mg/ml are not able to sense the same glucose concentration (0.16 mM), but respond to that of one order of magnitude higher (1.6 mM). This could be explained by considering that, as the MG concentration decreases, also do the number of ligand molecules, consequently, a lower glucose concentration is sufficient to saturate all the binding sites of the MGs network. The same hydrodynamic radius change measured for the two different MGs concentrations is due to the fact that in both the cases the MGs swelling has reached the saturation level. Since MGs particles dissolved in solution are fully swollen at those glucose concentrations, the DLS measurement of the particles average radius size of the two solutions gives the same result. We have also repeated the binding experiments with not functionalized MGs (i.e. treated only with APBA without EDC). As expected, no MGs size variations after glucose addition have been observed.
Integration of MGs Film on the LOF probe
MGs films have been painted onto the patterned Au layer integrated on the fiber tip by means of a dip coating technique (see Methods section). After depositing MGs, they were functionalized with APBA30. Control samples were prepared with a similar procedure by using (pNIPAm-co-AAc) MGs films treated only with APBA (without EDC).
In order to study the impact of the MG film properties on the glucose detection amplification performances, we have fabricated and tested three probes constituted by the same LOF device, but coated by MGs layers corresponding to three concentrations (5, 0.5 and 0.05%) of MGs in water solution. Obviously, different concentrations of MGs solutions give rise to thin films characterized by different degrees of homogeneity, uniformity, density, and compactness.
Functionalized MGs films have been morphologically characterized by means of Atomic Force Microscopy (Agilent Technologies 5420) measurements. AFM images are shown in Fig. 3(a,d,g), relative to a 5 µm × 5 µm patterned area around the fiber core. For all the concentrations, MGs look well assembled on the surface, forming a layer which follows the shape of the underlying patterned metallic slab (conformal deposition). However, for concentration of 5%, MGs look very packed among them, while at 0.05% MGs distribution is rather sparse. MGs concentration of 0.5% is a good compromise between compactness and uniformity of the resulting film. In fact, for lower MGs concentration, the MGs-Au interactions lead a strong adhesion of the particles on the free gold zones, and the MGs result sparse on the surface. By increasing MGs concentration, MGs-MGs interaction prevails and induce an increase of MGs thickness film (even creating a multilayer for higher concentrations). These differences are confirmed by the AFM analysis in a zoomed unpatterned area (2 µm × 2 µm) of the fibers tip, as shown in the Fig. 3(b,e,h). A slice processing of the previous mentioned AFM images is reported in Fig. 3(c,f,i) where a threshold of 25 nm is applied. Different MGs surface occupation of 33, 57.4 and 95.8% are found for MGs solutions of 0.05, 0.5 and 5% respectively.
Reflection spectra in air for the three probes are shown in Fig. 4. MGs deposition on the fiber tip induces a shift of the reflection spectrum dip of 87, 124 and 174 nm for concentrations of 0.05%, 0.5% and 5% respectively. The larger shifts achieved for higher concentrations of MGs in water solution are the result of a larger equivalent RI (increased density) or thickness (increased compactness) of the film created onto the fiber tip.
Biological experiments: glucose detection
In order to correctly evaluate the glucose response of the integrated devices in a temperature controlled environment, the fiber probes were immersed in a cuvette (filled with 700 µL of pH 9 carbonate buffer) placed on an aluminum holder heated by a Peltier cells controlled system (Supplementary Information, section S5). In this first experiment, the buffer solution was kept at a temperature of 20 °C. Solutions at different glucose concentrations (16 µM, 160 µM, 1.6 mM and 16 mM) were directly injected in the cuvette, thus avoiding the contact of the sensible area with air. Reflection spectra were recorded every minute. For each glucose concentration, spectra acquisitions have been stopped when wavelength shift changes between two adjacent points were less than 1%.
Figure 5 shows the resulting sensorgrams i.e. a plot of the resonance wavelength shifts as function of time at different glucose concentrations. First, consistently with previously reported works33,34,39,40 we find that the SPR wavelength undergoes a blue shift in response to glucose binding. In fact, MGs swelling (caused by glucose binding) induces a significant decrease of the film density, essentially due to the decrease of polymer/liquid ratio in the gel network40; as the MGs layer size increases, its ‘equivalent’ RI value decreases, which induces the SPR wavelength blue shift. When the glucose concentration increases, more glucose molecules bind to the APBA-functional moieties, resulting in a further MGs layer swelling (and thus resonance blue shift) until a new equilibrium is reached. This process continues until saturation occurs.
Figure 5a shows that the probe functionalized with MGs at the highest concentration (5%) does not respond to glucose concentration of 16 µM, while wavelength blue-shifts of 7.2 nm and 31.7 nm are measured at concentrations of 0.16 mM and 1.6 mM respectively. When the concentration of 16 mM is injected in cuvette, the sensor responds by speeding up the saturation process; at that point, the sensorgram slightly changes its slope, and it finally reaches a total shift of −36 nm. The probe fabricated with MGs concentration of 0,5% (Fig. 5b) responds to glucose concentration of 0.16 mM with a wavelength shift of −20.8 nm, that is about three times higher than that previously obtained with 5% MGs probe. However, the next higher glucose concentration (1.6 mM) is not detected by the probe, which saturates faster than the previous case. Interestingly, glucose concentration of 16 µM is detected by the probe fabricated with the lowest MGs concentration, and thus characterized by the less dense MGs film. However, with reference to Fig. 5c, this sensor responds with a shift of −11.4 nm to that glucose concentration (16 µM) which had induced zero shift in the probes functionalized with both 5% and 0.5% of MGs.
These results demonstrate that the LOD is a function of the MGs film morphological properties. In other words, by acting on the MGs concentrations, it is possible to tune the sensitivity range of the biosensor, which is able to detect higher/lower glucose concentrations depending on whether the MGs concentration is high/low. In line with previously discussed DLS experiments (Fig. 2c), this effect is due to the fact that the lower glucose concentration, the smaller absolute number of molecules interacting with the MGs network. As a consequence, if the MGs density onto the fiber tip is high, the overall MGs film volume change may be not large enough to become readable by the probe. By reducing the MGs film density a larger percentage of MGs are involved in the binding process, thus giving rise to a more significant volume change.
Besides this analogy, a substantial difference arises between DLS and optical probe measurements. With reference to Fig. 2c, MGs at concentrations of 1 mg/mL and 0.1 mg/mL exhibit the same swelling at saturation (Rh~90 nm), but for different glucose concentrations. On the other hand, optical measurements with the probes reveal that the higher is the MGs concentration, the higher is the measured wavelength shift at saturation. This phenomenon can be explained with the plasmonic nature of the LOF probe. In fact, a denser MGs film may be interpreted as layer with either larger equivalent RI (for a given thickness) or higher thickness (for a fixed RI). In the first case, swelling-induced RI variations starting from a larger initial RI induce larger SPR wavelength shifts. In the second case, the thickness increase occurring around a larger MGs layer thickness gives rise to larger resonant wavelength blue-shift.
Numerical simulations sustaining this conjecture have been included in the Supplementary Information (section S2). In this framework, the tuning of the evanescent field tail of the SPR, achieved by acting on the nanostructure integrated on the fiber tip, can be considered another important degree of freedom for controlling the detection capabilities of our probe.
The overall wavelength shifts ranging from about 10 to 40 nm measured in the detection experiments, are quite remarkable in relation to the small dimensions (180 dalton) of glucose molecules. For trying to correctly evaluate the sensitivity enhancement due to the integration of the MGs layer, we carried out glucose detection experiments by using the LOF probe without MGs integration. This test is a sort of reference for standard label free approaches. For making the comparison fair, we adopted the same functionalization procedure (based on APBA) used to functionalize MGs. The achieved sensorgram (Fig. S6.1) demonstrates that LOF device does not respond to any of the glucose concentrations considered in our analysis (see Supplementary Information, section S6). This is because the glucose molecule size is so small that the surface modifications on the fiber tip are not able to induce significant variations on the sensor surface. Moreover, for completeness, we have also experimentally evaluated the sensorgrams relative to the device integrated with functionalized MGs not activated by EDC (negative control); as expected, no wavelength shift is observed (flat sensorgrams for negative controls are shown in Fig. S6.2). These observations also represent an evidence that bulk refractive index variations of buffer solutions with different glucose concentrations do not affect the sensor response to glucose.
Another key aspect to note is the time response to glucose detection. Although providing higher absolute values of resonant wavelength shifts, the probes fabricated starting from higher MGs concentrations in water solution are characterized by longer time responses. This effect can be explained by considering that the higher is the density and compactness of the MGs film, the higher is the difficulty of the glucose molecule to permeate inside the polymeric network, and thus more time is required to reach the reaction equilibrium. Clearly, DLS measurements, being the MGs dispersed in buffer solution, are not affected by this trade-off between maximum variation and time response. Overall, response time of the order of tens of minutes represents a significant point of strength of MGs with respect to ‘bulk’ layers such as HGs, which are generally characterized by response time that are more than two orders of magnitude larger41.
Moreover, as previously reported in Fig. 3b, response time can be also tuned by acting on the MGs temperature during the binding step. We have thus repeated the same glucose binding detection experiment at 14 °C, (i.e. 6 degrees lower than the previous one) by using the same probe. Results are shown in Fig. 6a. Consistently with the DLS measurements, a shorter response time is achieved at the expense of a lower sensitivity (smaller absolute wavelength shift). In particular, by comparing sensorgrams of Fig. 5a and b, it results that the probes working at 14 and 20 °C detect the same glucose concentration (0.16 mM), and then saturate after about 100 and 300 minutes respectively. However, by working at 14 °C, such a concentration induces an overall shift of 16 nm that is about 5 nm smaller than that measured at 20 °C. For a better comparison of the different response times, we report in Fig. 6b, for both the temperatures, the wavelength shifts achieved during the 0.16 mM glucose binding step normalized to their maximum, where different kinetics are evident.
Conclusion
A biosensing platform resulting from the integration between plasmonic LOF device and functionalized MGs has been reported. With particular reference to small molecule detection, we have demonstrated that MGs deposited on top of optical fiber tip enable concentration of binding events through the use of their tridimensional network, as well as the amplification of the optical response of the probe through their swelling in response to molecule binding. Resonance shifts of the order of a few tens of nanometers can be achieved at glucose millimolar concentrations. Remarkably, such concentrations are not detected by using the same probe working with a standard label-free approach (i.e. without MGs integration). We have successfully demonstrated that, by exploiting the degrees of freedom offered by MGs, it is possible to tune the detection properties in terms of sensitivity range and response time. In particular, we have found that by choosing higher/lower concentrations of MGs in solution used during the probe fabrication procedure it is possible to detect lower/higher glucose concentrations, thus moving toward higher/lower values the LOD. Interestingly, we have also found that a trade-off exists between maximum available wavelength shift (sensitivity) and response time, with the latter that can be adjusted by changing the temperature of MGs in solution during the binding phase.
The developed platform offers many other degrees of freedom for optimizing the sensing capabilities. As an example, by changing monomer cocktail, cross linker, surfactant concentration and synthetic procedure, different kind of MGs in terms of size and thus swelling properties can be obtained21,23,27. For example, by having in mind in-vivo operation, MGs can be synthesized in order to make them completely insensitive to temperature, in such a way that the wavelength shifts measured inside the human body are only due to target molecule binding. Commonly used temperature-insensitive gel-based particles include: poly(lactic co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)42,43 or functionalized glycopolymer44. Concerning sensor regeneration for multiple analysis, although the gel network may affect the full reversibility, the molecule-ligand interaction is generally reversible41. Obviously, the regeneration procedure has to be optimized from time to time depending on the MGs typology, functionalization protocol and target molecule.
Future studies will be focused on optimizing procedures for controlling MGs deposition. Although in our experiments the EOT-like structure parameters have been chosen in order to maximize the sensitivity at the expenses of the resonance bandwidth, resonance Q factor and sensitivity can be significantly optimized through exploitation of advanced patterns and structures6,45,46.
Overall our results demonstrate that the combination of LOF device with MGs represents an effective technological paradigm for label-free biosensing. The improved detection performances resulting from the binding response amplification is particularly useful in the case of small molecules detection. Although here demonstrated for glucose detection, the versatility characterizing MGs make this platform easily extendable to the analyte detection cases where standard approaches fail.
Electronic supplementary material
Author Contributions
A. Ricciardi and A. Aliberti authors contributed equally. A. Cusano conceived the idea and supervised the project; M. Giaquinto, A. Ricciardi, A. Aliberti, A. Micco, A. Cusano and A. Cutolo designed the experiments, collected and analysed the data; A. Aliberti and M. Ruvo synthesized and characterized the thermoresponsive microgels; M. Giaquinto and A. Ricciardi conducted the theoretical simulations; A. Micco, Eugenia Bobeico and V. La Ferrara fabricated and characterized the LOF probe; All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-017-14852-5.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Consales M, et al. Lab-On-Fiber Technology: Toward Multifunctional Optical Nanoprobes. ACS nano. 2012;6:3163–3170. doi: 10.1021/nn204953e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cusano A., Consales, M., Crescitelli, A. & Ricciardi, A. Lab-On-FiberTechnology. Springer International Publishing: Berlin, (2015).
- 3.Ricciardi A, et al. Lab-On-Fiber Devices As An All Around Platform For Sensing. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2013;19:772–784. doi: 10.1016/j.yofte.2013.07.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ricciardi A, et al. Lab-On-Fiber Technology: A New Vision For Chemical And Biological Sensing. Analyst. 2015;140:8068–8079. doi: 10.1039/C5AN01241D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vaiano P, et al. Lab on Fiber Technology for biological sensing applications. Laser Photonics Rev. 2016;10:922–961. doi: 10.1002/lpor.201600111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Principe M, et al. Optical fiber meta-tips. Light: Science & Applications. 2017;6:e16226. doi: 10.1038/lsa.2016.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kostovski G, Stoddart PR, Mitchell A. The Optical Fiber Tip: An Inherently Light-Coupled Microscopic Platform For Micro-And Nanotechnologies. Adv. Mater. 2014;26:3798–3820. doi: 10.1002/adma.201304605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Carotenuto B, et al. Optical Guidance Systems for Epidural Space Identification. IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron. 2017;23:1–9. doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2600027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang H, Lee MY, Hogg MG, Dordick JS, Sharfstein ST. Gene Delivery In Three-Dimensional Cell Cultures By Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles. ACS nano. 2010;4:4733–4743. doi: 10.1021/nn9018812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mousavi MZ, et al. Magnetic Nanoparticle-Enhanced SPR On Gold Nanoslits For Ultra-Sensitive, Label-Free Detection Of Nucleic Acid Biomarkers. Analyst. 2013;138:2740–2748. doi: 10.1039/c3an36655c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mei Z, Dhanale A, Gangaharan A, Sardar DK, Tang L. Water Dispersion Of Magnetic Nanoparticles With Selective Biofunctionality For Enhanced Plasmonic Biosensing. Talanta. 2016;151:23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hoffman AS. Hydrogels For Biomedical Applications. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2012;64:18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Guan Y, Zhang Y. Boronic Acid-Containing Hydrogels: Synthesis And Their Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013;42:8106–8121. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60152h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Semwal V, Shrivastav AM, Verma R, Gupta BD. Surface Plasmon Resonance Based Fiber Optic Ethanol Sensor Using Layers Of Silver/Silicon/Hydrogel Entrapped With Adh/Nad. Sens. Actuators, B. 2016;230:485–492. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.02.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Verma R, Gupta BD. Fiber Optic Spr Sensor For The Detection Of 3-Pyridinecarboxamide (Vitamin B 3) Using Molecularly Imprinted Hydrogel. Sens. Actuators, B. 2013;177:279–285. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2012.10.135. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Singh S, Gupta BD. Fabrication And Characterization Of A Highly Sensitive Surface Plasmon Resonance Based Fiber Optic Ph Sensor Utilizing High Index Layer And Smart Hydrogel. Sens. Actuators, B. 2012;173:268–273. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2012.06.089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tierney S, Falch BMH, Hjelme DR, Stokke BT. Determination Of Glucose Levels Using A Functionalized Hydrogel- Optical Fiber Biosensor: Toward Continuous Monitoring Of Blood Glucose In Vivo. Anal. Chem. 2009;81:3630–3636. doi: 10.1021/ac900019k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gawel K, Stokke BT. Logic Swelling Response Of Dna–Polymer Hybrid Hydrogel. Soft Matter. 2011;7:4615–4618. doi: 10.1039/c1sm05221g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gao M, Toita S, Sawada SI, Akiyoshi K, Stokke BT. Cyclodextrin Triggered Dimensional Changes Of Polysaccharide Nanogel Integrated Hydrogels At Nanometer Resolution. Soft Matter. 2013;9:5178–5185. doi: 10.1039/c3sm27662g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Okay, O. General Properties Of Hydrogels. In Hydrogel sensors and actuators. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, 1–14(2009).
- 21.Pelton R. Temperature-sensitive aqueous microgels. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000;85:1–33. doi: 10.1016/S0001-8686(99)00023-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hendrickson GR, Smith MH, South AB, Lyon LA. Design Of Multiresponsive Hydrogel Particles And Assemblies. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010;20:1697–1712. doi: 10.1002/adfm.200902429. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hendrickson GR, Lyon LA. Bioresponsive Hydrogels For Sensing Applications. Soft Matter. 2009;5:29–35. doi: 10.1039/B811620B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hoare T, Pelton R. Highly Ph And Temperature Responsive Microgels Functionalized With Vinylacetic Acid. Macromolecules. 2004;37:2544–2550. doi: 10.1021/ma035658m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hoare T, Pelton R. Charge-Switching, Amphoteric Glucose-Responsive Microgels With Physiological Swelling Activity. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:733–740. doi: 10.1021/bm701203r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Debord JD, Lyon LA. Synthesis And Characterization Of Ph-Responsive Copolymer Microgels With Tunable Volume Phase Transition Temperatures. Langmuir. 2003;19:7662–7664. doi: 10.1021/la0342924. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jochum FD, Theato P. Temperature-And Light-Responsive Smart Polymer Materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013;42:7468–7483. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35191A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kuckling D. Responsive Hydrogel Layers—From Synthesis To Applications. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2009;287:881–891. doi: 10.1007/s00396-009-2060-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hu L, Serpe MJ. The Influence Of Deposition Solution Ph And Ionic Strength On The Quality Of Poly (N-Isopropylacrylamide) Microgel-Based Thin Films And Etalons. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2013;5:11977–11983. doi: 10.1021/am403745k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sorrell CD, Serpe MJ. Glucose Sensitive Poly (N-Isopropylacrylamide) Microgel Based Etalons. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012;402:2385–2393. doi: 10.1007/s00216-012-5736-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Islam MR, Serpe MJ. Polyelectrolyte Mediated Intra And Intermolecular Crosslinking In Microgel-Based Etalons For Sensing Protein Concentration In Solution. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:2646–2648. doi: 10.1039/c3cc00211j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Islam MR, Serpe MJ. Label-Free Detection Of Low Protein Concentration In Solution Using A Novel Colorimetric Assay. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013;49:133–138. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Giaquinto, M. et al. Microgel photonics and lab on fiber technology for advanced label-free fiber optic nanoprobes. In Sixth European Workshop on Optical Fibre Sensors (EWOFS'2016), 99161M-99161M. International Society for Optics and Photonics, (2016).
- 34.Giaquinto, M. et al. Lab on Fiber Biosensors Integrated with Microgels. In Asia-Pacific Optical Sensors Conference, W1A-4. Optical Society of America (2016).
- 35.Zhang Y, Guan Y, Zhou S. Synthesis And Volume Phase Transitions Of Glucose-Sensitive Microgels. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7:3196–3201. doi: 10.1021/bm060557s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ebbesen TW, Lezec HJ, Ghaemi HF, Thio T, Wolff PA. Extraordinary Optical Transmission Through Sub-Wavelength Hole Arrays. Nature. 1998;391:667–669. doi: 10.1038/35570. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Martin-Moreno L, et al. Theory Of Extraordinary Optical Transmission Through Subwavelength Hole Arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001;86:1114. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu H, Lalanne P. Microscopic Theory Of The Extraordinary Optical Transmission. Nature. 2008;452:728–731. doi: 10.1038/nature06762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sorrell CD, Serpe MJ. Reflection Order Selectivity Of Color-Tunable Poly (N-Isopropylacrylamide) Microgel Based Etalons. Adv. Mater. 2011;23:4088–4092. doi: 10.1002/adma.201101717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Reufer M, Diaz-Leyva P, Lynch I, Scheffold F. Temperature-Sensitive Poly (N-Isopropyl-Acrylamide) Microgel Particles: A Light Scattering Study. Eur. Phys. J. E: Soft Matter Biol. Phys. 2009;28:165–171. doi: 10.1140/epje/i2008-10387-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mesch M, Zhang C, Braun PV, Giessen H. Functionalized Hydrogel On Plasmonic Nanoantennas For Noninvasive Glucose Sensing. ACS Photonics. 2015;2:475–480. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhao L, Xiao C, Wang L, Gaia G, Ding J. Glucose-sensitive polymer nanoparticles for self-regulated drug delivery. Chem. Commun. 2016;52:7633–7652. doi: 10.1039/C6CC02202B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen C, et al. Current and Emerging Technology for Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Sensors. 2017;171:182. doi: 10.3390/s17010182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Guo Q, Wu Z, Zhang X, Suna L, Lia C. Phenylboronate-diol crosslinked glycopolymeric nanocarriers for insulin delivery at physiological pH. Soft Matter. 2014;10:911–920. doi: 10.1039/c3sm52485j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ricciardi, A., Aliberti, A., Giaquinto, M., Micco, A. & Cusano, A. Microgel photonics: a breathing cavity onto optical fiber tip. In International Conference on Optical Fibre Sensors (OFS24),963486-963486. International Society for Optics and Photonics, (2015).
- 46.Scaravilli M, Castaldi G, Cusano A, Galdi V. Grating-coupling-based excitation of Bloch surface waves for lab-on-fiber optrodes. Opt. Express. 2016;24:27771–27784. doi: 10.1364/OE.24.027771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.