Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA. 2017 Mar 7;317(9):937–946. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0972

Association of Rare and Common Variation in the Lipoprotein Lipase Gene with Coronary Artery Disease

Amit V Khera 1,*, Hong-Hee Won 1,*, Gina M Peloso 1, Colm O’Dushlaine 1, Dajiang Liu 1, Nathan O Stitziel 1, Pradeep Natarajan 1, Akihiro Nomura 1, Connor A Emdin 1, Namrata Gupta 1, Ingrid B Borecki 1, Rosanna Asselta 1, Stefano Duga 1, Piera Angelica Merlini 1, Adolfo Correa 1, Thorsten Kessler 1, James G Wilson 1, Matthew J Bown 1, Alistair S Hall 1, Peter S Braund 1, David J Carey 1, Michael F Murray 1, H Lester Kirchner 1, Joseph B Leader 1, Daniel R Lavage 1, J Neil Manus 1, Dustin N Hartzel 1, Nilesh J Samani 1, Heribert Schunkert 1, Jaume Marrugat 1, Roberto Elosua 1, Ruth McPherson 1, Martin Farrall 1, Hugh Watkins 1, Eric S Lander 1, Daniel J Rader 1, John Danesh 1, Diego Ardissino 1, Stacey Gabriel 1, Cristen Willer 1, Gonçalo R Abecasis 1, Danish Saleheen 1, Frederick E Dewey 1, Sekar Kathiresan 1, for the Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium, DiscovEHR Study Group, CARDIoGRAM Exome Consortium, and Global Lipids Genetics Consortium
PMCID: PMC5664181  NIHMSID: NIHMS914444  PMID: 28267856

Abstract

Importance

The activity of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is the rate-determining step in clearing triglyceride-rich lipoproteins from the circulation. Mutations that damage the LPL gene lead to lifelong deficiency in enzymatic activity and can provide insight into the relationship of LPL to human disease.

Objective

Determine if rare and/or common variants in the LPL gene are associated with early-onset coronary artery disease (CAD).

Design, Setting, and Participants

Cross-sectional study. The LPL gene was sequenced in 10 CAD case-control cohorts of the multinational Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium and a nested CAD case-control cohort of the Geisinger Health System DiscovEHR cohort between 2010 and 2015. Common variants were genotyped in up to 305,699 individuals of the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium and up to 120,600 individuals of the CARDIoGRAM Exome Consortium between 2012 and 2014. Study-specific estimates were pooled via meta-analysis.

Exposure

Rare damaging mutations in LPL included loss-of-function variants and missense variants annotated as pathogenic in a human genetics database or predicted to be damaging by computer prediction algorithms trained to identify mutations that impair protein function. Common variants in the LPL gene region included those independently associated with circulating triglyceride levels.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Circulating lipid levels and CAD.

Results

Among 46,891 individuals with LPL gene sequencing data available, mean age was 50 years (SD 12.6) and 51% were female. 188 participants (0.40%; 95%CI 0.35–0.46) carried a damaging mutation in the LPL gene – 105 of 32,646 control participants (0.32%) and 83 of 14,245 (0.58%) early-onset CAD cases. Compared to 46,703 non-carriers, the 188 heterozygous carriers of a LPL damaging mutation displayed higher plasma triglycerides (Beta coefficient= +19.6 mg/dL; 95%CI 4.6–34.6) and higher odds of CAD (odds ratio 1.84; 95%CI 1.35–2.51; P<0.001). An analysis of 6 common LPL variants noted an odds ratio for CAD of 1.51 (95%CI 1.39–1.64; P=1.1×10−22) per standard deviation increase in triglycerides.

Conclusions and Relevance

The presence of rare damaging mutations in the LPL gene was significantly associated with higher triglyceride levels and presence of CAD. However, further research is needed to assess causal mechanisms by which heterozygous LPL deficiency could lead to CAD.

Introduction

The enzymatic activity of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) serves as the rate-determining step in the postprandial clearance of circulating triglyceride-rich lipoproteins.1 Homozygous LPL deficiency, known as familial chylomicronemia syndrome, is associated with marked elevations in chylomicrons, severe hypertriglyceridemia, and recurrent pancreatitis.2 However, an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) in this condition has not been observed, potentially because the large circulating chylomicrons are unable to penetrate the arterial wall.3,4 By contrast, in heterozygous LPL deficiency, the attenuated capacity for lipolysis leads to a buildup of circulating chylomicron remnants and intermediate-density lipoproteins which are rich in both triglycerides and cholesterol. A study of nine such individuals suggested an increased risk of CAD,5 but this association has not been confirmed.

In this study, the LPL gene was sequenced to test the hypothesis that rare, damaging mutations leading to heterozygous LPL deficiency are associated with differences in circulating lipid levels as well as higher odds of early-onset CAD. In addition, to provide complementary evidence, independent common (allele frequency > 1%) variants in the LPL gene region were also tested for association with CAD.

Methods

Study Populations

The LPL gene was sequenced in participants of 10 previously described CAD case-control cohorts (eTable 1). Studies included the Italian Atherosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology (ATVB) study,6 the Exome Sequencing Project Early-Onset Myocardial Infarction (ESP-EOMI) study,7 a nested case-control of the Jackson Heart Study (JHS),8 the South German Myocardial Infarction study,9 the Ottawa Heart Study (OHS),10 the Precocious Coronary Artery Disease Study (PROCARDIS),11 the Pakistan Risk of Myocardial Infarction Study (PROMIS),12 the Registre Gironi del COR (Gerona Heart Registry or REGICOR) study,13 the Leicester Myocardial Infarction study,14 and the North German Myocardial Infarction study.15 Clinical data was assessed in each study. The majority of CAD cases in this analysis (97.5%) were ascertained with onset at an early age (defined as ≤50 years in men and ≤60 years in women). Informed consent was obtained from all participants of contributing studies, each of which received ethical approval from respective institutional review boards.

Replication of the observed associations with regard to lipid levels and CAD was performed via analysis of the previously described DiscovEHR study.16 DiscovEHR participants were recruited as part of the MyCode Community Health Initiative of the Geisinger Health System and Regeneron Genetics Center. The present analysis was restricted to early-onset CAD cases and CAD-free controls (age <55 years for men or <65 years for women for both cases and controls). Median values for serially measured laboratory and anthropometric traits were calculated for all individuals with two or more measurements in the electronic health records (EHR) following removal of likely spurious values that were >3 standard deviations from the intra-individual median value. Participants were considered to have CAD if they had a history of coronary revascularization in the EHR, or history of acute coronary syndrome, ischemic heart disease, or exertional angina (ICD-9 codes 410*, 411*, 412*, 413*, 414*) with angiographic evidence of obstructive coronary atherosclerosis (>50% stenosis in at least one major epicardial vessel from catheterization report). CAD-free controls were defined as individuals without any case criteria or any single encounter or problem list diagnosis code indicating CAD.

Across all studies, the effect of lipid-lowering therapy in those reporting use at the time of lipid measurement was taken into account by dividing the measured total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol by 0.8 and 0.7 respectively.1619 Because remnant cholesterol was not measured in study cohorts, values were estimated according to the following formula: Remnant cholesterol = Total cholesterol – HDL cholesterol – LDL cholesterol.20

In order to extend the analysis to common variants in the LPL gene, summary statistics of two large genome-wide association studies were analyzed. The effect of common LPL variants on circulating triglyceride levels was used as a proxy for influence on LPL activity. The relationship of common LPL variants with triglyceride levels was assessed in an analysis of up to 305,699 individuals from 73 cohorts of the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium genotyped using the HumanExome BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA) between 2012 and 2014. These same variants were subsequently linked to CAD in up to 120,600 individuals also genotyped between 2012 and 2014 in the previously reported CARDIoGRAM Exome Consortium study.15

Gene Sequencing

Whole exome sequencing of the Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium was performed at the Broad Institute (Cambridge, MA, USA) as previously described between 2010 and 2015.7 In brief, sequence data of all participants were aligned to a human reference genome build GRCh37.p13 using the Burrows–Wheeler Aligner algorithm. Aligned non-duplicate reads were locally realigned and base qualities were recalibrated using the Genome Analysis ToolKit (GATK) software.21 Variants were jointly called using the GATK HaplotypeCaller software. The sensitivity of the selected variant quality score recalibration threshold was 99.6% for single nucleotide polymorphisms and 95% for insertion/deletion variants as empirically assessed using HapMap controls with known genotypes included in the genotyping call set. LPL sequence data from the Geisinger Health System DiscovEHR participants was extracted from exome sequences generated at the Regeneron Genetics Center between 2014 and 2015 as previously described.16

Damaging LPL Variant Ascertainment

The positions of genetic variants were based on the complementary DNA reference sequence for LPL (GenBank accession number: NM_000237.2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NM_000237.2). Rare (minor allele frequency <1%) LPL variants were annotated with respect to the following three classes in a sequential fashion: 1) loss of function variants: single base changes that introduce a stop codon leading to premature truncation of a protein (nonsense), insertions or deletions (indels) of DNA that disrupt the translated protein’s amino acid sequence beyond the variant site (frameshift), or point mutations at sites of pre-mRNA splicing that alter the splicing process (splice-site); 2) variants annotated as “pathogenic” in ClinVar, a publicly available archive of genetic variations associated with clinical phenotypes;22 3) missense variants predicted to be damaging or possibly damaging by each of five computer prediction algorithms (LRT score, MutationTaster, PolyPhen-2 HumDiv, PolyPhen-2 HumVar, and SIFT) as performed previously.7,23 Software used to annotate observed variants included Variant Effect Predictor (version 81) and associated LOFTEE plugin,24,25 and the dbNSFP database (version 3.0b1).26

Statistical Analysis

The association of rare, damaging LPL mutations with lipid phenotypes in the Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium and the DiscovEHR studies was estimated using linear regression with adjustment for age, age2, sex, study cohort, and the first five principal components of ancestry. Principal components of ancestry were based on observed genotypic differences across subpopulations (e.g. race or ethnicity) in the overall study. Inclusion of principal components as covariates in linear regression analyses increases statistical power for true relationships and minimizes confounding by ancestry.27 The association of LPL mutations with odds of CAD was determined via meta-analysis utilizing Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel statistics for stratified 2-by-2 tables without continuity correction as implemented previously.9,18,28

Common (allele frequency > 1%) variants at the LPL locus independently associated with circulating triglyceride levels were ascertained via analysis of the Global Lipid Genetics Consortium cohorts. The association of variants with inverse normal transformed residuals of natural log of triglyceride levels was determined in a model adjusted for age, age2, sex and up to four principal components of ancestry. For any given genetic locus, such as LPL, multiple variants may be associated with circulating triglyceride levels in an independent fashion. Sequential forward selection provides a statistical framework to identify such independent variants.29,30 The relationship of all genetic variants in the LPL locus with triglycerides was first determined. This analysis was then repeated using regression conditional upon the most strongly associated variant, continuing the process until the top result was no longer significant at a pre-specified P-value threshold of < 5 ×10−8 (to represent genome-wide significance). To aid in interpretability, the beta coefficients derived from this analysis were converted into units of mg/dL using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2005–2012, in which a similar transformation was employed (substituting self-reported race for principal components of ancestry) to yield a conversion factor of 60.7 mg/dL change in triglyceride level per one unit change in inverse normal transformed values.

These same common LPL variants were linked to CAD using summary-level test statistics in the previously reported CARDIoGRAM Exome Consortium study.15 The cumulative association of these variants with odds of CAD was determined, standardized per genetic standard deviation increase in triglyceride levels. Explicitly, if × is the association of each variant with the outcome of interest, and y the association of each variant with triglyceride levels, then the estimated association of a one-standard deviation increase in triglycerides mediated by LPL locus variants is calculated as a fixed effects meta-analysis of x/y for all variants. This method is mathematically equivalent to a previously reported approach.31

Analyses were performed using R version 3.2.2 software (The R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). All reported P-values were two-tailed, with a value < 0.05 used as a threshold for statistical significance unless otherwise specified.

Results

Gene sequencing of LPL was performed in 22,533 participants of the Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium, including 12,395 controls and 10,138 cases with CAD (Table 1). 123 loss of function or missense variants in the LPL gene with minor allele frequency <1% were identified. Of these 123, 52 variants were classified as damaging (Table 2). Eight of these 123 variants led to loss of function, including 5 premature stop (“nonsense”) codons, 2 splice acceptor/donor variants, and 1 frameshift mutation. Only about 25% of missense variants in any given gene have strongly damaging impact on protein function;32 additional annotation algorithms were thus needed for the 115 missense variants. Six were previously deemed pathogenic based on ClinVar annotation. In addition, 38 of the 109 remaining missense variants were predicted to be damaging by each of 5 computer prediction algorithms. Because any individual damaging mutation was rare (eTable 2), the 52 damaging variants were aggregated for subsequent analyses of phenotypic consequences.

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of the Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium and Early-Onset CAD DiscovEHR Study Participants.

Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium Geisinger Health System DiscovEHR Cohortc
CAD Cases (n = 10,138) CAD-free Controls (n = 12,395) CAD Cases (n = 4,107) CAD-free Controls (n = 20,251)
Age, years, median (IQR) 45 (41–50) 60 (48–68) 52 (47–57) 46 (35–55)
Female Sex, n (%) 1,294 (28%) 4,276 (19%) 2,169 (53%) 16,334 (81%)
BMI, kg/m2, median (IQR) 26 (24–29) 27 (25–31) 32 (28–38) 31 (26–37)
Current Smoker, n (%) 4,322 (47%) 2,406 (21%) 986 (24%) 4,110 (20%)
Medical History
 Type 2 Diabetes, n (%) 2,190 (25%) 1,942 (19%) 1,520 (37%) 2,661 (13%)
 Hypertension, n (%) 2,918 (47%) 3,741 (42%) 3,373 (82%) 6,848 (34%)
 Lipid-lowering Medication a 2,739 (31%) 473 (5%) 2,494 (61%) 3,711 (18%)
Lipid Phenotypes, mg/dL
 Total Cholesterol, median (IQR)b 216 (181–252) 197 (168–228) 209 (184–240) 198 (173–227)
 LDL Cholesterol, median (IQR) b 138 (107–171) 120 (96–147) 124 (101–151) 117 (96–142)
 HDL Cholesterol, median (IQR) 37 (31–45) 42 (33–53) 44 (37–53) 50 (42–61)
 Triglycerides, median (IQR) 166 (116–246) 133 (90–198) 154 (112–215) 120 (85–167)
 Remnant Cholesterol, median (IQR) 33 (23–48) 28 (19–40) 33 (22–50) 24 (16–35)

Percentages indicative of participants with non-missing values.

a

At the time of lipid measurement.

b

Total and LDL cholesterol values were divided by 0.8 and 0.7 respectively in those on lipid-lowering medication to estimate untreated values.

c

Participants were considered to have early-onset (men <55 years, women <65 years) coronary artery disease if they had a history of coronary revascularization in the electronic health records, or history of acute coronary syndrome, ischemic heart disease, or exertional angina (ICD-9 codes 410*, 411*, 412*, 413*, 414*) with angiographic evidence of obstructive coronary atherosclerosis (>50% stenosis in at least one major epicardial vessel from catheterization report). Participants were considered to have diabetes if they had at least 2 out of (i) a history of type 2 diabetes in the electronic health record, (ii) antidiabetic medication use, or (iii) fasting glucose greater than 126 mg/dL or hemoglobin A1c greater than 6.5 percent Participants were considered to have hypertension if they had a history of hypertension in the electronic health records, antihypertensive medication use, or systolic blood pressure greater than 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure greater than 90 mmHg.

CAD: coronary artery disease; IQR: interquartile range; SI conversion factor: To convert cholesterol to mmol/L, multiply values by 0.0259. To convert triglyceride levels to mmol/L, multiple values by 0.01129.

Table 2.

Association of Damaging LPL Mutations with Coronary Artery Disease by Rare Variant Class in the Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium Studies and Early-Onset CAD DiscovEHR Study

Variant Class Loss of Function ClinVar Pathogenic Predicted Damaging Missense Combined
Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium
Number of Variants 8 6 38 52
N (%) Carriers of 10,138 CAD Cases 7 (0.07%) 15 (0.15%) 38 (0.37%) 60 (0.59%)
N (%) Carriers of 12,395 Controls 2 (0.02%) 5 (0.04%) 30 (0.24%) 37 (0.30%)
Beta Coefficient for Association with Triglycerides, mg/dL (95% CI) +35.6 (−4.8 – 119.4)
P = 0.41
+ 18.2 (−50.3 – 86.7)
P = 0.60
+ 25.6 (−7.3 – 58.5)
P = 0.13
+ 25.6 (−2.5 – 53.5)
P = 0.07
Odds Ratio for CAD (95% CI) 4.33 (0.85 – 21.96)
P = 0.08
3.47 (1.25 – 9.58)
P = 0.02
1.55 (0.96 – 2.50)
P = 0.07
1.96 (1.30 – 2.96)
P = 0.001
Geisinger Health System DiscovEHR Cohort
Number of Variants 3 7 15 25
N (%) Carriers of 4,107 CAD Cases 1 (0.02%) 6 (0.15%) 16 (0.39%) 23 (0.56%)
N (%) Carriers of 20,251 Controls 2 (0.01%) 28 (0.14%) 38 (0.19%) 68 (0.34%)
Beta Coefficient for Association with Triglycerides, mg/dL (95% CI) +194.6 (92.7 – 296.4)
P < 0.001
+29.3 (−0.8 – 59.3)
P=0.06
+2.4 (−20.1 – 24.9)
P=0.83
+ 17.2 (−0.5 – 34.9)
P = 0.07
Odds Ratio for CAD (95% CI) 2.47 (0.22 – 27.2)
P = 0.46
1.06 (0.44 – 2.55)
P=0.90
2.08 (1.16 – .2.69)
P=0.01
1.67 (1.04 – 2.69)
P = 0.03

Rare variants refer to those with minor allele frequency <1% in the sequenced population. Loss of function variants were defined as single base changes that introduce a stop codon leading to premature truncation of a protein (nonsense), insertions or deletions (indels) of DNA that disrupt the translated protein’s amino acid sequence beyond the variant site (frameshift), or point mutations at sites of pre-mRNA splicing that alter the splicing process (splice-site). Predicted damaging variants refer to those predicted to be deleterious or possibly deleterious by each of five in silico prediction algorithms (LRT score, MutationTaster, PolyPhen-2 HumDiv, PolyPhen-2 HumVar and SIFT). Beta coefficients reflective of the difference in triglyceride concentrations between carriers of a damaging LPL mutation, as compared to noncarriers, were derived from linear regression analysis that included adjustment for age, age2, gender, cohort, and the first five principal components of ancestry. Principal components of ancestry were based on observed genotypic differences across subpopulations (e.g. race or ethnicity) in the overall study. Inclusion of principal components as covariates in linear regression analyses increases statistical power for true relationships and minimizes confounding by ancestry.27 The association of LPL mutations with risk of CAD was determined via meta-analysis implementing Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel statistics for stratified 2-by-2 tables.

CAD: coronary artery disease; CI: confidence interval.

A total of 97 individuals in the Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium cohorts carried one of the 52 damaging LPL mutations, including 60 cases (0.59%; 95%CI 0.46 – 0.77%) and 37 controls (0.30%; 95%CI 0.21 – 0.42%) as noted in eTable 3. Circulating lipid levels were available in 16,200 (72%) of the participants, including 72 of 97 (74%) of mutation carriers. Median triglyceride levels were 183 versus 147 mg/dL in LPL mutation carriers and non-carriers respectively. In an adjusted linear regression model, circulating triglyceride levels were 25.6 mg/dL (95%CI −2.5 – 53.5) higher in mutation carriers as compared to non-carriers although there was no significant association (P = 0.07) (Figure 1 & eTable 4). Furthermore, mutation carriers were at increased odds of having clinical hypertriglyceridemia (triglyceride levels ≥ 150 mg/dL) – odds ratio 1.88; 95%CI 1.13 – 3.20; P = 0.02.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Association of Damaging LPL Mutations with Circulating Lipid Concentrations

Beta coefficients reflective of the difference in lipid concentrations between carriers of a damaging LPL mutation, as compared to noncarriers, were derived from linear regression analysis that included adjustment for age, age2, gender, cohort, and the first five principal components of ancestry. Principal components of ancestry are based on observed genotypic differences across subpopulations (e.g. race or ethnicity) in the overall study. Inclusion of principal components as covariates in linear regression analyses increases statistical power for true relationships and minimizes confounding by ancestry.27 Fixed-effects meta-analysis was used to combine results across cohorts (P for heterogeneity > 0.50 for each lipid phenotype). The number of participants from each study cohort with lipid fraction values available is displayed.

The presence of a rare, damaging LPL mutation was associated with an odds ratio for CAD of 1.96 (95%CI 1.30 – 2.96; P = 0.001) in a combined analysis of the Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium studies (Figure 2). This association was most pronounced in those with a loss of function mutation in LPL (Table 2). Within the subgroup of 2,592 CAD cases and 5,341 controls free of CAD with an observed LDL cholesterol (<130 mg/dL), an increased odds of CAD among carriers of a damaging LPL mutation remained apparent (odds ratio = 2.15; 95%CI 1.14 – 4.06; P = 0.02).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Association of Damaging LPL Mutations with Coronary Artery Disease among 46,891 Individuals in 11 Studies.

In each study, the relationship of rare, damaging mutations in LPL with risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) was determined. P-values for association tests and confidence intervals were determined using exact methods. A meta-analysis across studies was performed with the use of the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel statistics for stratified 2-by-2 tables. This method combines score statistics and is particularly useful when some observed odds ratios are zero. NA – Not Available; an odds ratio in the JHS cohort was not available due to absence of identified carriers of a damaging LPL mutation. The full study names are as follows: Jackson Heart Study (JHS), the Precocious Coronary Artery Disease Study (PROCARDIS), the Registre Gironi del COR (Gerona Heart Registry or REGICOR) study, the Ottawa Heart Study (OHS), the North German Myocardial Infarction study, the Italian Atherosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology (ATVB) study, the Leicester study, the South German Myocardial Infarction study, the Exome Sequencing Project Early-Onset Myocardial Infarction (ESP-EOMI) study, the Pakistan Risk of Myocardial Infarction Study (PROMIS), and the DiscovEHR project of the Regeneron Genetics Center and the Geisinger Health System.

Independent replication of the increased circulating triglyceride levels and CAD was performed in 24,358 individuals from the Geisinger Health System DiscovEHR cohort (Table 1). This cohort included 4,107 individuals with early-onset (age <55 years in men or <65 years in women) CAD as ascertained based on medical records and 20,251 CAD-free controls. Ninety-one individuals were heterozygous carriers of a damaging LPL mutation, including 23 (0.56%; 95%CI 0.36 – 0.85%) CAD cases and 68 (0.34%; 95%CI 0.26 – 0.43%) CAD-free controls. Circulating triglycerides were 17.2 mg/dL (95%CI −0.5 – 34.9; P = 0.06) higher in mutation carriers as compared to non-carriers (Figure 1 & Table 2). These individuals were at increased odds of early-onset CAD (odds ratio 1.67; 95%CI 1.04 – 2.69; P = 0.03).

In a combined analysis of the Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium and DiscovEHR cohorts, a damaging LPL mutation was present in 188 of 46,891 individuals (0.40%; 95%CI 0.35 – 0.46%). A meta-analysis of the association with lipid levels demonstrated that these mutations were associated with a 19.6 mg/dL increase in circulating triglycerides (95%CI 4.6 – 34.6), a 3.6 mg/dL decrease in HDL cholesterol (95%CI −5.7 – −1.5), and a 5.6 mg/dL increase in remnant cholesterol (95%CI 2.3 – 9.0) as displayed in Figure 1. These mutations were additionally associated with increased odds of early-onset CAD (odds ratio 1.84; 95%CI 1.35 – 2.51; P < 0.001) as demonstrated in Figure 2.

Beyond rare, damaging mutations, common variants at the LPL locus were analyzed to assess for a similar link to triglyceride levels and CAD. In an analysis of up to 305,699 individuals, six common variants (minor allele frequency ranging from 1–29%) were robustly (P < 5×10−8) and independently associated with plasma triglycerides. The minor (less common) allele of four of these variants were associated with decreased triglyceride levels, suggesting gain of lipoprotein lipase activity, and two were linked to increased triglyceride levels, consistent with decreased activity. In an analysis of up to 120,600 individuals of CAD case-control studies, we confirmed that each of these variants was associated with odds of CAD (P < 0.002 for each) with the expected directionality. A roughly linear relationship was noted in this dataset between association with triglyceride levels and odds of CAD (eFigure 1). A weighted analysis that combined these six variants demonstrated an odds ratio for CAD of 1.51 (95%CI 1.39 – 1.64; P= 1.1 × 10−22) per standard deviation increase in triglycerides mediated by LPL locus variants.

Discussion

The protein-coding exons of the LPL gene were sequenced in 46,891 individuals from an international collaboration of CAD case-control cohorts and patients of a large health care organization. In this study, approximately 1 in 249 (0.40%) individuals carried a rare, damaging mutation in LPL. These carriers have increased circulating triglyceride levels (Beta coefficient = +19.6 mg/dL) and an odds ratio of 1.84 for early-onset CAD. An analysis using common variants in LPL similarly demonstrated a significant association with CAD.

These results permit several conclusions. First, heterozygous LPL deficiency was associated with the presence of early-onset CAD. By identifying 188 carriers of a rare, damaging mutation, an association with higher triglycerides and remnant cholesterol and lower HDL cholesterol was established along with an odds ratio for early-onset CAD of 1.84. This susceptibility to CAD may be due to impaired lipolysis of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins are known to penetrate directly into the arterial wall and are selectively retained in the intima, thus promoting the development of cholesterol-rich foam cells and an inflammatory response that accelerate atherosclerosis.33

Second, a complementary common variant analysis involving six independent LPL variants confirmed the association of genetic variation in LPL with CAD. In an analysis in over 300,000 individuals, each common variant’s association with triglyceride levels was used as a proxy for influence on lipoprotein lipase activity. Association of these same variants with CAD in over 120,000 individuals demonstrated an odds ratio for CAD of 1.51 per standard deviation increase in triglycerides associated with common LPL locus variants. These findings confirm and extend previous common variant studies that have suggested similar trends.15,34,35

Third, these data add to considerable recent genetic evidence that beyond LDL cholesterol, lipoprotein lipase and its endogenous regulation – via facilitator (APOA5) and inhibitor proteins (APOC3, ANGPTL4) – represent an important determinant of human atherosclerosis. Similar approaches have been used to demonstrate that damaging mutations in APOA5 are associated with a significant increase in odds of CAD.7,20 By contrast, rare inactivating mutations in APOC3 and ANGPTL4 confer substantial vascular protection.9,15,16,36 Ongoing research will seek to clarify the mechanistic interactions between these proteins. However, in each case, CAD risk is likely to be affected by lifelong alterations in lipoprotein lipase activity. Whether therapy to alter this pathway will decrease risk of CAD remains unknown.

A key strength of the present analysis is that the LPL gene was sequenced in a large number of individuals to analyze the entire spectrum of damaging mutations, each of which was rare in the population. Second, concordant results were demonstrated between CAD case-control studies of the Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium and the DiscovEHR study participants from the Geisinger Health System, in whom CAD status was ascertained based on electronic health records. This reinforces the potential utility of ongoing efforts, such as the UK Biobank and the All of Us Research Program (a cohort study within the Precision Medicine Initiative), which will facilitate large-scale interrogations of genetic variants as they relate to human disease.

Several limitations should be acknowledged. The approach to annotating rare missense variants in the LPL gene using prediction algorithms and the ClinVar database has been previously validated and is fully reproducible.7,23 However, because functional validation of each variant was not performed, this method may have led to misclassification in some cases. Second, because the effect of LPL activity on regulation of circulating triglyceride levels is most pronounced following a meal,37 the degree of triglyceride elevation among mutation carriers would likely have been greater if post-prandial triglyceride levels were available. Third, this study assessed the association of LPL mutations with susceptibility to early-onset CAD; effect estimates might differ among individuals with later onset of disease. Fourth, both triglycerides and calculated remnant cholesterol, the primary lipid components of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, were increased in those harboring a LPL mutation. Because remnant cholesterol was estimated and not directly measured in the present analysis, additional research is needed to determine the relative contributions of these components to human CAD.

Conclusions

The presence of rare damaging mutations in the LPL gene was significantly associated with higher triglyceride levels and presence of CAD. However, further research is needed to assess causal mechanisms by which heterozygous LPL deficiency could lead to CAD.

Supplementary Material

Online-only supplemental material

Key Points.

Question

Are heterozygous carriers of a damaging mutation in the gene encoding lipoprotein lipase at increased odds of coronary artery disease?

Findings

Gene sequencing identified a damaging mutation in the lipoprotein lipase gene in 188 of 46,891 (0.40%) individuals from coronary artery disease case-control studies; these mutations were associated with a 19.6 mg/dL increase in plasma triglycerides and an odds ratio of 1.84 for presence of coronary artery disease.

Meaning

The presence of rare damaging mutations in the lipoprotein lipase gene was significantly associated with higher triglyceride levels and presence of coronary artery disease. However, further research is needed to assess causal mechanisms by which heterozygous lipoprotein lipase deficiency could lead to coronary artery disease.

Acknowledgments

Funding Sources:

Field work, genotyping, and standard clinical chemistry assays in PROMIS were principally supported by grants awarded to the University of Cambridge from the British Heart Foundation, U.K. Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, EU Framework 6–funded Bloodomics Integrated Project, Pfizer, Novartis, and Merck. Additional support for PROMIS was provided by the U.K. Medical Research Council (MR/L003120/1), British Heart Foundation (RG/13/13/30194), U.K. National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, European Research Council (268834), and European Commission Framework Programme 7 (HEALTH-F2-2012-279233). The Jackson Heart Study is supported by contracts HHSN268201300046C, HHSN268201300047C, HHSN268201300048C, HHSN268201300049C, and HHSN268201300050C from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. REGICOR study was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Innovation through the Carlos III Health Institute (Red Investigación Cardiovascular RD12/0042, PI09/90506), European Funds for Development (ERDF-FEDER), and by the Catalan Research and Technology Innovation Interdepartmental Commission (2014SGR240). Samples for the Leicester cohort were collected as part of projects funded by the British Heart Foundation (British Heart Foundation Family Heart Study, RG2000010; UK Aneurysm Growth Study, CS/14/2/30841) and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit Biomedical Research Informatics Centre for Cardiovascular Science, IS_BRU_0211_20033). The Munich MI Study is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the context of the e:Med program (e:AtheroSysMed) and the FP7 European Union project CVgenes@target (261123). Additional grants were received from the Fondation Leducq (CADgenomics: Understanding Coronary Artery Disease Genes, 12CVD02). This study was also supported through the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft cluster of excellence “Inflammation at Interfaces” and SFB 1123. The Italian Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB) Study was supported by a grant from RFPS-2007-3-644382 and Programma di ricerca Regione-Università 2010–2012 Area 1–Strategic Programmes–Regione Emilia-Romagna. Funding for the exome-sequencing project (ESP) was provided by RC2 HL103010 (HeartGO), RC2 HL102923 (LungGO), and RC2 HL102924 (WHISP). Exome sequencing was performed through RC2 HL102925 (BroadGO) and RC2 HL102926 (SeattleGO). Exome sequencing in ATVB, PROCARDIS, Ottawa, PROMIS, Munich Study, and the Jackson Heart Study was supported by 5U54HG003067 (to Drs. Lander and Gabriel). The authors would like to thank the MyCode® Community Health Initiative participants for their permission to utilize their health and genomics information in the DiscovEHR collaboration. The DiscovEHR study was funded in part by the Regeneron Genetics Center.

Footnotes

Author Contributions:

Drs. Khera and Kathiresan had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Khera, Won, Kathiresan

Acquisition of data: Khera, Won, Peloso, Stitziel, Dewey, Kathiresan

Analysis and interpretation of data: Khera, Won, Peloso, O’Dushlaine, Liu, Stitziel

Drafting of the manuscript: Khera, Won, Kathiresan

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors

Statistical analysis: Khera, Won, Peloso, O’Dushlaine, Liu, Stitziel

Study supervision: Kathiresan

Declaration of Interests:

AVK is supported by an ACCF/Merck Cardiovascular Research Fellowship, a John S. Ladue Memorial Fellowship at Harvard Medical School, and a KL2/Catalyst Medical Research Investigator Training award from Harvard Catalyst funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (TR001100), and has received consulting fees from Merck and Amarin. HHW was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (No. 2016R1C1B2007920). GMP is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K01HL125751. COD is an employee of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. NOS reports funding from K08HL114642 and R01HL131961, has received a research grant form AstraZeneca and consulting fees from Regeneron. IB is an employee of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. DJC, MFM, HLK, JBL, DRL, JNM, DNH, and LK report grant support from Regeneron Genetics Center. DJR has received consulting fees from Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Novartis; is an inventor on a patent related to lomitapide that is owned by the University of Pennsylvania and licensed to Aegerion Pharmaceuticals; and is a cofounder of Vascular Strategies and Staten Biotechnology. DA has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly and Company, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Menarini Group, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis; and research grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, and Novartis. DS has received grants from Pfizer and the National Institutes of Health. CJW is supported by HL109946 and HL127564. FD is an employee and stockholder of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. SK is supported by a research scholar award from the Massachusetts General Hospital, the Donovan Family Foundation, and R01 HL127564; he has received grants from Bayer Healthcare, Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; and consulting fees from Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Leerink Partners, Noble Insights, Quest Diagnostics, Genomics PLC, and Eli Lilly and Company; and holds equity in San Therapeutics and Catabasis Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the NHLBI, the National Institutes of Health, the Harvard Catalyst, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Role of the Funding Sources:

For the analysis of the Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium, the Global Lipid Genetics Consortium, and the CARDIoGRAM Exome Consortium studies, the funders of the individual study cohorts had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The DiscovEHR study was funded in part by the Regeneron Genetics Center and employees of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals were involved in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals did not have the power to veto a decision to submit the study for publication. Investigators associated with each study had access to the data and AVK and SK were responsible for the final decision to submit for publication.

References

  • 1.Eckel RH. Lipoprotein lipase. A multifunctional enzyme relevant to common metabolic diseases. N Engl J Med. 1989;320(16):1060–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198904203201607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brunzell JD, Deeb SS. Familial lipoprotein lipase deficiency, apo CII deficiency and hepatic lipase deficiency. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AI, Sly WS, Valle D, editors. The metabolic and molecular basis of inherited disease. 8. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000. pp. 2789–816. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nordestgaard BG, Stender S, Kjeldsen K. Reduced atherogenesis in cholesterol-fed diabetic rabbits. Giant lipoproteins do not enter the arterial wall. Arteriosclerosis. 1988;8:421–428. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.8.4.421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nordestgaard BG. Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: New Insights From Epidemiology, Genetics, and Biology. Circ Res. 2016;118(4):547–63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nordestgaard BG, Abildgaard S, Wittrup HH, et al. Heterozygous lipoprotein lipase deficiency: frequency in the general population, effect on plasma lipid levels, and risk of ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 1997;96(6):1737–44. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.6.1737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Atherosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology Italian Study Group. No evidence of association between prothrombotic gene polymorphisms and the development of acute myocardial infarction at a young age. Circulation. 2003;107:1117–22. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000051465.94572.d0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Do R, Stitziel NO, Won H-H, et al. Exome sequencing identifies multiple rare alleles at LDLR and APOA5 that confer risk for myocardial infarction. Nature. 2015;519:102–106. doi: 10.1038/nature13917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Taylor HA, Jr, Wilson JG, Jones DW, et al. Toward resolution of cardiovascular health disparities in African Americans: design and methods of the Jackson Heart Study. Ethn Dis. 2005;15(4 Suppl 6):S6-4–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Crosby J, Peloso GM, Auer PL, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in APOC3, triglycerides, and coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:22–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1307095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McPherson R, Pertsemlidis A, Kavaslar N, et al. A common allele on chromosome 9 associated with coronary heart disease. Science. 2007;316:1488–91. doi: 10.1126/science.1142447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Clarke R, Peden JF, Hopewell JC, et al. Genetic variants associated with Lp(a) lipoprotein level and coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2518–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Saleheen D, Zaidi M, Rasheed A, et al. The Pakistan Risk of Myocardial Infarction Study: a resource for the study of genetic, lifestyle and other determinants of myocardial infarction in South Asia. European journal of epidemiology. 2009;24:329–38. doi: 10.1007/s10654-009-9334-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sentí M, Tomàs M, Marrugat J, Elosua R. Paraoxonase1–192 polymorphism modulates the nonfatal myocardial infarction risk associated with decreased HDLs. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21:415–20. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.21.3.415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Samani NJ, Erdmann J, Hall AS, et al. Genomewide association analysis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(5):443–53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Myocardial Infarction Genetics CARDIoGRAM Exome Consortia Investigators. Coding Variation in ANGPTL4, LPL, and SVEP1 and the Risk of Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(12):1134–44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dewey FE, Gusarova V, O’Dushlaine C, et al. Inactivating Variants in ANGPTL4 and Risk of Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(12):1123–33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, et al. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet. 2005;366(9493):1267–1278. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67394-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium Investigators. Stitziel NO, Won HH, et al. Inactivating mutations in NPC1L1 and protection from coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(22):2072–82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Benn M, Watts GF, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Mutations causative of familial hypercholesterolaemia: screening of 98 098 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study estimated a prevalence of 1 in 217. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(17):1384–94. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.J⊘rgensen AB, Frikke-Schmidt R, West AS, Grande P, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A. Genetically elevated non-fasting triglycerides and calculated remnant cholesterol as causal risk factors for myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(24):1826–33. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20(9):1297–303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Riley GR, Jang W, Rubinstein WS, Church DM, Maglott DR. ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D980–5. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Purcell SM, Moran JL, Fromer M, et al. A polygenic burden of rare disruptive mutations in schizophrenia. Nature. 2014;506:185–90. doi: 10.1038/nature12975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McLaren W, Pritchard B, Rios D, Chen Y, Flicek P, Cunningham F. Deriving the consequences of genomic variants with the Ensembl API and SNP Effect Predictor. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2069–70. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016;536(7616):285–91. doi: 10.1038/nature19057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu X, Wu C, Li C, Boerwinkle E. dbNSFP v3.0: A One-Stop Database of Functional Predictions and Annotations for Human Nonsynonymous and Splice-Site SNVs. Hum Mutat. 2016;37(3):235–41. doi: 10.1002/humu.22932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38(8):904–9. doi: 10.1038/ng1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nioi P, Sigurdsson A, Thorleifsson G, et al. Variant ASGR1 Associated with a Reduced Risk of Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2131–41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yang J, Ferreira T, Morris AP, et al. Conditional and joint multiple-SNP analysis of GWAS summary statistics identifies additional variants influencing complex traits. Nat Genet. 2012;44:369–75. doi: 10.1038/ng.2213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu DJ, Peloso GM, Zhan X, et al. Meta-analysis of gene-level tests for rare variant association. Nat Genet. 2014;46:200–4. doi: 10.1038/ng.2852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Burgess S, Butterworth A, Thompson SG. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet Epidemiol. 2013;37:658–65. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zuk O, Schaffner SF, Samocha K, et al. Searching for missing heritability: designing rare variant association studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:E455–64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322563111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nordestgaard BG, Wootton R, Lewis B. Selective retention of VLDL, IDL, and LDL in the arterial intima of genetically hyperlipidemic rabbits in vivo: molecular size as a determinant of fractional loss from the intima-inner media. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:534–42. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.15.4.534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jensen MK, Rimm EB, Rader D, et al. S447X variant of the lipoprotein lipase gene, lipids, and risk of coronary heart disease in 3 prospective cohort studies. Am Heart J. 2009;157(2):384–390. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Thomsen M, Varbo A, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Low nonfasting triglycerides and reduced all-cause mortality: a mendelian randomization study. Clin Chem. 2014;60(5):737–46. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.219881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.J⊘rgensen AB, Frikke-Schmidt R, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A. Loss-of-function mutations in APOC3 and risk of ischemic vascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(1):32–41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Miesenböck G, Hölzl B, Föger B, et al. Heterozygous lipoprotein lipase deficiency due to a missense mutation as the cause of impaired triglyceride tolerance with multiple lipoprotein abnormalities. J Clin Invest. 1993;91(2):448–55. doi: 10.1172/JCI116222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Online-only supplemental material

RESOURCES