Abstract
In the expanding population of immunocompromised patients and those treated in intensive care units, rare fungal infectious agents have emerged as important pathogens, causing invasive infections associated with high morbidity and mortality. These infections may present either as de novo or as breakthrough invasive infections in high-risk patients with hematologic malignancies receiving prophylactic or empirical antifungal therapy or in patients with central venous catheters. Diagnosis and treatment are challenging. Physicians should have a high index of suspicion because early diagnosis is of paramount importance. Conventional diagnostic methods such as cultures and histopathology are still essential, but rapid and more specific molecular techniques for both detection and identification of the infecting pathogens are being developed and hopefully will lead to early targeted treatment. The management of invasive fungal infections is multimodal. Reversal of risk factors, if feasible, should be attempted. Surgical debridement is recommended in localized mold infections. The efficacy of various antifungal drugs is not uniform. Amphotericin B is active against most yeasts, except Trichosporon, as well as against Mucorales, Fusarium, and some species of Paecilomyces and dimorphic fungi. The use of voriconazole is suggested for the treatment of trichosporonosis and scedosporiosis. Combination treatment, though recommended as salvage therapy in some infections, is controversial in most cases. Despite the use of available antifungals, mortality remains high. The optimization of molecular-based techniques, with expansion of reference libraries and the possibility for direct detection of resistance mechanisms, is awaited with great interest in the near future. Further research is necessary, however, in order to find the best ways to confront and destroy these lurking enemies.
Keywords: invasive fungal infections, rare, yeast, mold, mucormycosis, trichosporon
Introduction
The quest for the early diagnosis and effective treatment of invasive fungal infections is ongoing, and there are still many obstacles to overcome. The main agents responsible for these infections are members of the genera Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus. However, there are other fungi, yeasts, and molds, which, though rare in human disease, can cause equally serious and life-threatening infections in immunocompromised and other susceptible hosts. These include yeasts ( Trichosporon, Magnusiomyces, Saprochaete, Rhodotorula, Saccharomyces, and Malassezia), mucormycetes, hyaline molds, dematiaceous (melanized) molds, and some novel taxa of thermally dimorphic fungi. Furthermore, a new Candida species, C. auris, has emerged and may pose a threat to hospitalized patients. The aim of this review is to present an update on invasive infections due to these rare and emerging fungi, focusing on new developments in diagnostic methodologies and therapeutic modules. In the light of recent taxonomic research and nomenclature changes of many pathogens, this review, though clinically oriented, will inevitably refer to some of these recent advances.
Rare yeasts
Infections due to yeasts other than Candida and Cryptococcus account for about 2 to 3% of all fungemias 1– 3. They mainly occur in patients with hematologic malignancies or the critically ill. A large proportion of these infections represent breakthrough fungemias in patients already receiving an antifungal agent or are associated with central venous catheters (CVCs). Some of these yeasts are colonizers of the skin or the mucosal surfaces, whereas others may be found in the environment or even in food. The clinical presentation is non-specific, the only characteristic being that cutaneous exanthems are more common than in candidemia 4. Diagnosis is based on blood cultures.
Candida auris
C. auris is an emerging, multiple-drug-resistant (MDR) yeast causing a broad range of healthcare-associated invasive infections. It was first reported in Japan in 2009 when an isolate was recovered from the external ear canal of an inpatient 4. The first bloodstream infections were reported two years later from South Korea 5; shortly after that, C. auris fungemia was documented in India 6– 8, South Africa 9, and Kuwait 10. Since then, this difficult-to-treat yeast has been spreading across several countries in Europe, Asia, and the Americas 11– 15. In a recent study from India, C. auris accounted for more than 5% of candidemia in a national survey of intensive care units (ICUs) 7. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) and epidemiological analyses, performed by Lockhart et al., led to the conclusion that this species has emerged recently, independently, and almost simultaneously on three continents and not as a result of worldwide dissemination of a dominant clone 12. The earliest case to date was identified in retrospect by DNA sequencing of a Korean bloodstream isolate from 1996 5.
Most cases of fungemia due to C. auris have been reported from hospitalized patients. Patients range from neonates to the elderly and have the well-known risk factors for invasive candidiasis. Like other Candida spp., C. auris colonizes the skin and mucosal surfaces (that is, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and respiratory tract). In addition, environmental sampling of the clinical area surrounding colonized patients demonstrated contamination of the floor around bed sites, radiators, equipment monitors, mattresses, beds, windowsills, chairs, infusion pumps, and countertops 16, 17.
The phylogeny of C. auris is similar to that of C. haemulonii, which is another species resistant to amphotericin B and fluconazole 5. WGS data also revealed a relationship to C. lusitaniae, which is intrinsically resistant to many antifungals 18, 19. Commercial identification systems, such as Vitek 2 and API20C-AUX, misidentify this yeast as C. haemulonii, C. famata, C. sake, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Rhodotorula glutinis and this misidentification is primarily due to a lack of C. auris in the database of these systems 5, 6, 9. The most reliable methods for diagnosis of C. auris are molecular-based ones, such as amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) fingerprinting and sequencing analysis 20, 21. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems (Bruker and Vitek MALDI-TOF MS) also have the potential for an accurate identification given the incorporation of a library containing C. auris and a proper extraction method 21. In a recently published study, where the isolates from 54 patients were analyzed, 93% were found to be resistant to fluconazole, 35% to amphotericin B, and 7% to echinocandins, while 41% were resistant to two antifungal classes and 4% were resistant to three classes 12. Voriconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were elevated in 50% of isolates in two large series from India and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 12, 20. Posaconazole and isavuconazole show excellent in vitro activity against C. auris 9, 12, 14. Currently, the drugs of choice for treating fungemia due to C. auris are the echinocandins provided that susceptibility testing has been performed 22. A new drug, SCY-078, which is an orally bioavailable 1,3-β-D-glucan synthesis inhibitor, exhibits potent activity against C. auris isolates and may prove to be an important antifungal in the treatment of MDR species 23.
The overall crude in-hospital mortality rate of C. auris fungemia ranges from 30 to 60% 16, 24. The rapid emergence of C. auris has prompted the CDC in the USA, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, and other institutions to publish alerts and recommendations regarding the control of this notorious fungus 25, 26.
Trichosporon
Trichosporon species are basidiomycetous yeast-like fungi, are found in soil and freshwater, are part of the human mycobiome, and colonize the skin, the peri-genital areas, and the gastrointestinal tract. Invasive trichosporonosis has been described in patients with leukemia, burns, and AIDS, in patients receiving corticosteroids, and in patients who have undergone heart valve or ophthalmic surgery 27– 31. Trichosporon spp. cause a wide spectrum of infections, ranging from white piedra and hypersensitivity pneumonia in immunocompetent patients to fungemia, endocarditis, peritonitis, and meningitis in patients with hematologic malignancies 27, 31– 34. The species most commonly found in fungemias are T. asahii (75%), T. mucoides (7%), T. inkin (5%), and T. asteroides (5%) 28, but at least 15 other species have been identified from clinical samples 29. Microscopic characteristics are pseudohyphae and septate hyphae along with arthroconidia and blastoconidia.
Diagnosis is made by blood cultures. Species identification relies either on phenotypic methods or on molecular analysis targeting the ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region 35. The rapid MALDI-TOF MS methodology is being increasingly applied and appears to be a promising tool. Molecular methods have also been developed for the detection of Trichosporon spp. in blood and tissues, even in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue 36, but no standardized method exists yet. Cross-reactions with the serum Cryptococcus glucuronoxylomannan antigen as well as the Aspergillus galactomannan antigen (GM) have been reported in several cases of Trichosporon fungemia 37– 39, and dual positivity may be suggestive for Trichosporon infection. Serum β-D-glucan is often detected, but sensitivity is low 39.
The preferred antifungal for treating trichosporonosis is voriconazole 40. Posaconazole and other triazoles are also active, and fluconazole shows variable potency 40– 42. Amphotericin B, the echinocandins, and flucytosine are not indicated for treating trichosporonosis. The mortality of disseminated infection remains high (rates of 42 to 77% 27, 32, 43).
Magnusiomyces and Saprochaete
Magnusiomyces capitatus (formerly Geotrichum capitatum, Blastoschizomyces capitatus, or Saprochaete capitata) and Saprochaete clavata (formerly known as Geotrichum clavatum) are human pathogens that are closely related and are frequently mistaken for each other 44. The taxonomy of Geotrichum was revised relatively recently 45, but many authors use the older names. With the use of ITS sequencing, isolates are identified as S. clavata, M. capitatus, or Geotrichum candidum 44. These fungi are ascomycetous yeasts found in soil, water, plants, poultry feces, and dairy products 46– 48. They may colonize the human skin and mucosae and can cause infections clinically similar to candidiasis. Reports of infections due to M. capitatus originate mainly from Europe, mostly from the Mediterranean area 43, 49, 50, but there have also been publications from Asia 51. The majority of cases are seen in patients with underlying hematologic malignancies 43, 49, 52. Nosocomial outbreaks have been reported 49, 53. Fungemias due to S. clavata are very rare, but a multicenter outbreak was identified by WGS in France 54. In patients with neutropenia, the disease is disseminated, often presenting with fever and cutaneous lesions. Several organs, including the lung, liver, spleen, bone, kidneys, brain, and endocardium, may be involved 50. Keratitis 55, meningitis, and osteomyelitis 56 may also occur.
Diagnosis is based on blood cultures. Molecular methods are necessary in order make a correct identification 44. Patients with invasive infection may have a positive GM test, but it is uncertain whether this can be used as a diagnostic tool because invasive aspergillosis may coexist with infection due to Magnusiomyces or Saprochaete 57, 58.
The preferred agent for the treatment of invasive infections is amphotericin B with or without concomitant flucytosine 40. Voriconazole is active in vitro, and there are case reports where it has been used successfully 46, 59. Mortality of disseminated infection is high, ranging from 50 to 75% 43, 47, 60.
Rhodotorula
Rhodotorula spp . are basidiomycetous yeasts, which are widespread in nature. They are found in air, soil, lakes, seawater, foods, and beverages 61. They have also been isolated from medical equipment, such as bronchoscopes, and from shower curtains, bathtubs, and toothbrushes 62. The fungus may colonize the skin, nails, and the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and genital tract of humans 63.
The culture of Rhodotorula spp. produces distinctive orange to salmon-colored mucoid colonies. The most common species, which may cause invasive infections in humans, are R. mucilaginosa (rubra), R. glutinis, and R. minuta. Infections occur mainly in patients with hematologic or other malignancies and in the majority present as fungemia, which is almost always catheter-related 63– 68. Other reported infections include endocarditis 64, 69, 70, peritonitis (associated with ambulatory peritoneal dialysis) 71, meningitis 72, and endophthalmitis 67, 73 and occur in patients with AIDS, extensive burns, or cirrhosis, in those who have undergone intra-abdominal surgery, and in critically ill patients in the ICU 74, 75.
Rhodotorula spp. are resistant in vitro to echinocandins and azoles 76, 77, and there are several cases where fungemia with Rhodotorula emerged in patients receiving prophylaxis with these agents 66, 78. The recommended treatment is amphotericin B with or without flucytosine 40. CVCs should be removed. Mortality is estimated to be 12 to 20% 63, 64.
Saccharomyces
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (also known as “baker’s yeast”) is a ubiquitous ascomycetous yeast found in soil, plants, and fruit 79. S. boulardii is a strain of S. cerevisiae with some specific genome features 80, 81 and is found in some probiotic preparations 82, 83 used in the prevention and treatment of various diarrheal diseases 84. Saccharomyces has been isolated from the throat, stool, urine, and perineum of patients with hematologic malignancies 85. It is an emerging cause of invasive fungal infections, either in patients receiving probiotics 82, 83, 86, 87 or in those with underlying diseases, such as leukemia 79. There have been reports of nosocomial outbreaks 88, 89, some of them attributed to central catheters or hand transmission 88, 90, but the largest proportion of these fungemias is associated with probiotics 79. The clinical presentation is the same as that of candidemia. Diagnosis is made by culture and conventional identification methods 40. In the search for early diagnostic markers, β-D-glucan has been considered and has been found in the plasma of patients and in culture supernatant 91, 92, but no clinical data are available to prove its usefulness. A novel multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the detection and differentiation of fungal pathogens in clinical specimens of hematological patients, including Saccharomyces spp., has been developed and seems promising, but validation is still required 93. Amphotericin B has the lowest MICs for Saccharomyces and is considered the drug of choice for its treatment 40. There have been reports of successful treatment with echinocandins 94, 95. Fluconazole is often inactive. Probiotics should be discontinued and CVCs removed 40. Mortality of S. cerevisiae fungemia was 29.5% in one study but, in most cases, could not be attributed only to fungemia 87.
Malassezia
Malassezia is a genus of basidiomycetous yeasts comprising the lipid-dependent Malassezia furfur and the lipid-independent species Malassezia pachydermatis, which are part of the normal skin microbiota 96. They can cause skin infections (for example, pityriasis versicolor) as well as systemic infections in neonates receiving lipid-containing parenteral nutrition and in children and adults with hematologic malignancies, cancer, Crohn’s disease, and chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis 97. There are multiple reports of outbreaks in neonatal ICUs 98– 100. The clinical signs and symptoms of Malassezia fungemia are non-specific, consisting mainly of fever. Dissemination to the heart, lungs, and other organs may occur 101. Diagnosis is made by culture but is difficult because routinely used media do not support the growth of this fungus, which requires lipids 101. The recommended treatment for severe cases is amphotericin B and for non-severe cases fluconazole, although M. pachydermatis may be less susceptible in vitro 40, 97, 101. The mortality of invasive Malassezia infections is unknown, but it seems that, with appropriate management, the attributable mortality is low 101.
Rare molds
Mucormycetes
Mucormycosis is the third most common cause of invasive fungal infection (after candidiasis and aspergillosis). The agents of mucormycosis are ubiquitous in nature and are found mainly in decaying organic matter. They belong to the order Mucorales and include the genera Rhizopus, Rhizomucor, Mucor, Lichtheimia, Apophysomyces, Cunninghamella, Saksenaea, Cokeromyces, Actinomucor, and Syncephalastrum 102. Some of these genera, such as Saksenaea and Apophysomyces, are more common in certain geographic areas 103– 105. The major risk factors for mucormycosis are uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, hematologic malignancies, organ or bone marrow transplantation, neutropenia, treatment with corticosteroids, trauma and burns, and deferoxamine (an iron/aluminium chelator) therapy 106. Iron acquisition is a critical step in the pathogenetic mechanism of mucormycosis, and deferoxamine has been shown to act as a siderophore for Mucorales 106.
Mucorales cause a diverse and devastating spectrum of infections. Rhinocerebral, pulmonary soft tissue, and disseminated disease are the most common clinical presentations, but virtually any organ can be affected 107, 108. The fungi invade the arteries, leading to extensive vessel thrombosis and subsequent infarction 106. Although tissue necrosis is the hallmark of mucormycosis, a presentation and syndrome-oriented approach to diagnosis lacks sensitivity and specificity. Other fungi, such as Aspergillus or Fusarium, may produce the same clinical signs. Nevertheless, there are some features which should lead to a higher index of suspicion for invasive pulmonary mucormycosis 109. These include prior prophylaxis with voriconazole or emergence of breakthrough fungal infection in an immunocompromised patient receiving agents active against Aspergillus but not Mucorales. Radiologically, multiple (at least 10) nodules and pleural effusion are more common in mucormycosis. The presence of reverse halo sign on computed tomography is a strong indicator of lung mucormycosis and may appear earlier than other radiologic findings 110– 112.
The diagnosis is traditionally based on direct microscopic examination, histopathology, and culture. Mucorales produce rapidly growing white to gray fluffy colonies with broad hyphae microscopically and a variety of species-specific structures such as stolons, rhizoids, sporangia, apophyses, sporangiophores, columellae, and sporangiospores. The hyphae are large, ribbon-like, irregular pauciseptate or aseptate in contrast with those seen in aspergillosis, which are more regular and septate. However, mucormycosis can be either overdiagnosed or missed by histopathology. In a study of 58 culture-proven mold infections from four tertiary centers using a blinded assessment, Aspergillus spp. infections were misidentified as mucormycosis in 11% of the cases 113. In another study, 2 out of 58 cases diagnosed as aspergillosis on histopathology or cytology or both were proven to be mucormycosis by culture 114. Furthermore, 30 to 50% of histopathology-proven cases may have negative cultures 115, 116.
Studies have shown that molecular identification of mucormycosis is accurate, using the ITS region of the ribosomal DNA as a first-line sequencing target for the identification of Zygomycete organisms in pure culture 117. When no culture is available, PCR assays on fresh or FFPE tissues can identify and discriminate between agents of aspergillosis and mucormycosis 118– 123. These techniques are not yet standardized but provide a promising tool for the identification of fungal agents. Detection of circulating Mucorales DNA in serum using real-time PCR is another field of current research and may aid in the earlier diagnosis of the disease 124, 125.
Early diagnosis of mucormycosis is crucial, and prompt therapeutic intervention may prevent progressive tissue invasion and its sequelae 109, 126. Therefore, it is very important to use all available diagnostic methods in order to achieve the best possible outcome. Treatment is multimodal, including antifungal agents, surgical debridement, and reversal of underlying risk factors 127, 128. Mucorales are resistant to most antifungals in vitro. Amphotericin B is the most active drug, except for Cunninghamella and Apophysomyces isolates 129, 130. Posaconazole and isavuconazole are also active, while itraconazole and terbinafine show some activity against certain strains. There seems to be some correlation between the degree of susceptibility of Mucorales isolates to amphotericin B and outcomes. In a small study by Lamoth et al., an MIC of not more than 0.5 μg/mL was significantly associated with better 6-week outcomes 131. Liposomal amphotericin B is the drug of choice for first-line treatment. Posaconazole is recommended for salvage or maintenance therapy. Isavuconazole has recently been approved for the treatment of mucormycosis, but its role as first-line treatment has not yet been defined 132.
Even with aggressive therapy, the mortality of mucormycosis remains high. For this reason, there is interest in the use of combination treatment or adjunctive modalities. In a recent study, which evaluated the impact of monotherapy versus combination therapy in a group of 106 patients with hematologic malignancies and which used a propensity score analysis, there was no improved outcome for the group receiving combination treatment 133. Combination of amphotericin B with deferasirox, an iron chelator which does not act as a siderophore for Mucorales, was associated with poorer outcomes in a small prospective study in patients with hematologic malignancies 134. However, based on preclinical data, there might be a role for this approach in patients with other underlying diseases 135. Other adjunctive treatments used in the attempt to enhance the outcome of this devastating disease include cytokines and hyperbaric oxygen. Some authors published case reports of successive treatment of mucormycosis with the use of hyperbaric oxygen in combination with antifungal treatment 136. There are also some data showing that granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors or interferon-gamma or both may enhance the immune response against certain Mucorales 137. However, since the data are only in vitro or pre-clinical, these therapies must be used cautiously.
Hyaline molds
Fusarium. Fusarium species are widely distributed in nature, occurring in ecosystems all around the globe. They are known important plant pathogens 138 and constitute a large genus with a complex and evolving taxonomy. However, only a few species complexes (SCs), currently 10, are involved in human disease; the most frequent are Fusarium solani, F. oxysporum, F. incarnatum-equiseti, F. fujikuroi (including the species F. verticillioides, F. proliferatum, and F. sacchari), F. clamydosporum, and F. dimerum 139, 140. Depending on the immune status of the host and the portal of entry, they cause a broad spectrum of infections, including superficial, locally invasive, and disseminated infection, and have considerable morbidity and high mortality rates 141. Some species produce mycotoxins and have a significant impact on animal and human health 138.
In immunocompetent hosts, Fusarium species, along with Candida and Aspergillus, are considered a leading cause of keratitis. Risk factors include accidental trauma, long-term use of topical corticosteroids and antibiotics, diabetes, pre-existing eye infections, eye surgery 142, 143, and (since the 1980s) contact lens use, with increasing frequency 144, especially in more developed countries 145– 148. Fusarium keratitis progresses slowly and can cause devastating ocular damage after the formation of penetrating ulcer and endophthalmitis. Therapy consists of topical antifungals, sometimes in combination with subconjunctival injections, but therapeutic keratoplasty may be needed in difficult cases. In many cases, the outcome is poor, especially in delayed diagnosis, and is more favorable in contact lens wearers 149.
Other forms of fusariosis, including the most prevalent ones in otherwise healthy individuals, are onychomycosis and skin infections, peritonitis following continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, catheter-associated fungemia, and, less frequently, pneumonia, osteomyelitis, arthritis, otitis, sinusitis, and brain abscess, usually after trauma 150.
In the immunocompromised hosts, those mostly at risk have acute myeloid and acute lymphoid leukemia, and the most important risk factors are neutropenia, lymphopenia, graft-versus-host disease, corticosteroid use, or any other immunosuppressive treatment. Infection is almost always invasive and frequently disseminated 151. The most common routes of infection are direct inoculation and airborne uptake 141, and the portals of entry are the paranasal sinuses, the lungs, and skin lesions such as interdigital intertrigo, abnormal appearing nails, and paronychia 152, 153. Disseminated fusariosis is hardly distinguishable from aspergillosis both clinically and histologically, but agents of fusariosis, unlike those of aspergillosis and mucormycosis, can be isolated from blood cultures. It typically presents with fever in severely neutropenic patients and with myalgia and sudden appearance of erythematous, papular, or painful nodular skin lesions which evolve rapidly to central necrosis. The lungs and sinuses can also be affected, and pneumonia occurs in almost 50% of cases 154.
According to the few existing epidemiological studies, the incidence appears to be low—less than 0.3% among allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies—but variable in different geographic regions 155– 158. The highest incidence is in Brazil: 5.2% among allogeneic HCT recipients and 3.8% in patients with acute myeloid leukemia 158. Hematological patients in this region appeared to have an unusually high incidence of cutaneous portal of entry 159, 160. In previous studies, increased incidence of infection has been associated with hospital water distribution systems which also serve as a potential reservoir of Fusarium spp. 3, 161. The distribution of Fusarium species varies too in different geographic regions, but it seems that any species of Fusarium can cause any type of infection 162, 163.
Diagnosis is based on conventional mycological methods—direct microscopy, culture, and histopathology 154—and has to be as prompt and accurate as possible. However, direct microscopy and histopathology, though highly sensitive, are not specific for Fusarium, as hyphae share the same characteristics with all hyaline molds, such as Aspergillus and Scedosporium.
Culture has low sensitivity, as it can be positive in just 60% of cases 154. Identification of a Fusarium isolate to the genus level is easy because of the characteristic banana-shaped macroconidia 154. However, identification to the species level requires molecular methods, preferably performed in reference laboratories 140. MALDI-TOF MS appears to be a promising and more feasible approach for the identification of clinical isolates of Fusarium at the species level provided that the existing database is expanded 164. For direct and rapid detection in tissues and blood, multiplex reverse transcription–PCR methods have recently been developed with promising results 140, 165.
Clinically important species are resistant to almost all currently used antifungals, and this poses a challenge for antifungal therapy 166. The exact resistance mechanisms in Fusarium have not been elucidated yet, but combinations of CYP51A amino-acid alterations or CYP51A gene overexpression or both might be involved in azole resistance 167. Amphotericin B has the lowest MICs in vitro, whereas the azoles show variable values with a large interspecies variability 163. Voriconazole appears to be effective in vivo and a good alternative to amphotericin B despite higher MICs 154.
Based on the available data, voriconazole or a lipid-based amphotericin B formulation is recommended as primary therapy 151, 154. Combination therapy is frequently used but not scientifically supported. Posaconazole is recommended as salvage therapy 151, 154. A thorough clinical evaluation and treatment of skin lesions, particularly onychomycosis, have been recommended for patients at high risk for invasive fusariosis, prior to or upon initiation of antineoplastic therapy 154. In addition to antifungal treatment, surgical debridement of infected tissues, removal of venous catheters in confirmed catheter-related fusariosis, and reversal of the immunocompromised state should take place whenever possible for an optimal outcome 151, 154. Prognosis in the immunocompromised is poor and is highly dependent on the underlying condition and immune status of the patient, but survival seems to have substantially increased in the last decade 168.
Scedosporium and Lomentospora. The hyaline molds known as Scedosporium and Pseudallescheria until 2014 are cosmopolitan saprophytes, commonly found in soil, polluted water, compost, and the manure of cattle and fowl 151, 169. They have a complex taxonomy, hence the nomenclature discrepancies with older studies 170– 172. The most frequent clinically relevant species are Scedosporium boydii, S. apiospermum, and S. auratiacum. S. boydii and S. apiospermum are clearly distinct species but, owing to common pathology characteristics and antifungal susceptibility patterns, may be considered a complex and indicated as “ S. apiospermum SC” in the routine laboratory, as proposed by de Hoog et al. in 2013 173. The name “ Scedosporium” has also been proposed for their teleomorphic stages (sexual forms) Pseudallescheria boydii and P. apiosperma 172.
Distribution varies according to climate 151. They cause highly lethal opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients, but also a wide range of infections in immunocompetent individuals, with considerable morbidity 171. They are frequently isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis, occasionally causing lung infection 174, 175.
Infections in the immunocompetent occur after penetrating trauma and include keratitis, endophthalmitis, otitis, sinusitis, central nervous system (CNS) infections, osteoarticular and soft tissue infections, and mycetoma 176, 177. Disseminated infections with S. apiospermum/Pseudallescheria and pneumonia or CNS involvement can follow near-drowning accidents in polluted water 171, 177– 185. Of note are cases of transplant recipients with previously near-drowning victims as donors 186, 187. In contrast, Lomentospora prolificans (formerly Scedosporium prolificans, or S. inflatum) is mainly isolated from cases with underlying immunosupression 188. Infection can affect any organ, usually the skin, sinuses, lungs, and the CNS, following hematogenous dissemination, and delayed treatment of brain abscesses is associated with a high mortality rate (>75%) 188. This species is also phylogenetically separated from the other Scedosporium species; therefore, the recommendation was recently made to rename it Lomentospora prolificans 172 (that is, under its oldest genus name Lomentospora 189).
As in fusariosis and other mold mycoses, diagnosis is based on direct microscopy, culture, and histopathology, but more sensitive and specific methods are sought for accurate and prompt diagnosis. New molecular methods have recently been developed and are promising for both direct detection and identification to the species level. In infections with L. prolificans, blood cultures may be positive in more than 50% of cases and isolates can be easily differentiated from their S. apiospermum counterparts because of their characteristic microscopic morphology with inflated phialides 171.
Therapy is challenging because of a high rate of resistance to antifungals, and the therapeutic outcome is usually poor in patients with persistent immunosuppression. S. apiospermum is resistant in vitro to amphotericin B and flucytosine, and susceptibility to itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and the echinocandins is variable. L. prolificans is highly resistant to all antifungals, and mortality rates are as high as 95% in immunocompromised patients 190. Voriconazole demonstrates the strongest in vitro activity against this species 191. There are suggestions of synergistic activity of voriconazole with colistin 192, terbinafine 193– 197, or caspofungin 198. Combinations of azoles and terbinafine and sequential azole and terbinafine therapy also appear effective against L. prolificans 199. In general, the management of both S. apiospermum SC and L. prolificans depends on the underlying condition of the host, and voriconazole has been suggested as first-line treatment 200– 204. In the immunocompromised, therapy is multimodal, and, whenever possible, reversal of the immune suppression, along with surgical debridement of infected tissues, is recommended 205, 206.
Paecilomyces and Purpureocillium. Until recently, the fungal species Paecilomyces variotii and Paecilomyces lilacinus were considered to belong to the same genus, but new taxonomic studies have shown that they are not genetically related, and the latter is now assigned the name Purpureocillium lilacinum 207. They are found in soil, decaying plant material 208– 210, indoor air, and foods 210.
Paecilomyces infections are associated with almost any organ or system of the human body 211. The most usual infections in immunocompromised patients are cutaneous, catheter-related, and disseminated infections, pneumonia, cellulitis, fungemia, and pyelonephritis 208, 209, 211– 213. The most frequent infection caused by Purpureocillium lilacinum is keratitis in otherwise healthy hosts after trauma, surgery, or prolonged contact lens use 214.
Diagnosis is based on conventional mycological methods. MALDI-TOF MS analysis is a promising tool, as with all of the above-described fungi, but requires further cutoff standardization and a reliable reference library 215. There is no optimal antifungal treatment established. P. lilacinum strains are highly resistant to amphotericin B but susceptible to azoles, whereas P. variotii is usually amphotericin B susceptible 151.
Dematiaceous (or melanized) molds
These fungi are darkly pigmented because of the presence of melanin in the cell wall, which acts as a virulence factor 216– 218. More than 70 genera are implicated in human disease; Alternaria, Aureobasidium, Bipolaris, Cladophialophora, Curvularia, Exophiala, Exserohilum, Hortaea werneckii, Neoscytalidium dimidiatum, Ochroconis, and Rhinocladiella are some of the most known representatives 219.
Commonly found in soil and plant material, they are distributed worldwide, although some neurotropic fungi are often geographically restricted: Rhinocladiella mackenziei occur in the Middle East and Cladophialophora bantiana occur mainly in India, whereas cases of Exophiala dermatitidis are reported mainly from East Asia 220. They cause phaeohyphomycosis, a term that refers to a broad range of diseases ranging from allergic sinusitis to superficial and disseminated infections, pneumonia, brain abscess 220, and even iatrogenic infections, such as the 2012–2013 multistate (USA) fungal meningitis epidemic due to Exserohilum rostratum 221. Infections can be life-threatening in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent individuals. Diagnosis is based on conventional mycological methods and PCR. There are no standardized therapies, but voriconazole, posaconazole, and itraconazole demonstrate the most consistent in vitro activity against this group of fungi. Voriconazole may be superior for CNS infections. Surgery is required for local infections and brain abscesses 220.
Rare and emerging dimorphic fungi
Emmonsia-like fungi and Emergomyces
The genus Emmonsia makes up part of the Ajellomycetaceae family of the Onygenales order, along with the genera Blastomyces, Histoplasma, and Paracoccidioides, among others. Until recently, two species were recognized— E. crescens and E. parva—which cause adiaspiromycosis, a granulomatous pulmonary disease of rodents and other small mammals and very rarely of humans, through conversion into large, thick-walled “adiaspores” in the infection sites 222, 223. However, in recent years, there has been an increase in cases of diseases caused by novel Emmonsia-like species. The increase between 2006 and 2015 was primarily driven by the recognition of HIV-associated cases in South Africa following the introduction of molecular identification protocols for dimorphic fungal infections in 2008 223. These new species differ from the “classical” ones ( E. crescens and E. parva) in that they are able to convert into yeast-like cells capable of replication and extra-pulmonary dissemination during the course of infection, instead of the non-replicating adiaspores 223. Infection probably occurs through the inhalation of spores, but the environmental niche is as yet unknown. New taxonomic research suggests some putative virulence factors that may play a role in the infection and pathogenicity of the novel Emmonsia strains, but these findings need further investigation 224. The species Emmonsia pasteuriana 225– 227 has now been classified in a new genus of the Ajellomycetaceae family, Emergomyces ( Emergomyces pasteurianus comb. nov.) 228.
Clinical diagnosis of infections due to Emmonsia-like species is difficult because of the protean nature of symptoms and signs. Infections usually are disseminated involving primarily the skin and lungs and frequently are misdiagnosed as tuberculosis. Cutaneous manifestations may be misdiagnosed as varicella, Kaposi’s sarcoma, and drug reactions 229. Laboratory diagnosis is made by biopsy of the skin or any other involved organ and blood culture, although histopathologic findings are not sufficient to distinguish Emmonsia or Emergomyces sp. from other dimorphic fungi. In culture, the above genera are hard to identify by morphological methods alone, and molecular identification is imperative for accurate diagnosis. Urine Histoplasma antigen may aid diagnosis because of high cross-reactivity 229. Emmonsia-like infections are highly lethal if untreated, the most effective drug being amphotericin B 229, although some azoles appear to have variably low MICs in vitro 222.
Es. pasteurianus and other Emergomyces species ( Es. africanus and Es. orientalis) isolated from sporadic cases in different countries such as Italy, Spain, China, Canada, South Africa, and Germany underline the potential of Emergomyces species as new cosmopolitan opportunistic pathogens in the immunocompromised host 228.
Talaromyces (Penicillium) marneffei
Talaromyces marneffei (formerly Penicillium marneffei), recently renamed on the basis of new sequence data 230, has been recognized as a significant human pathogen across Southeast Asia with the global AIDS pandemic 231 and represents an “AIDS-defining pathogen” in this region 232, 233. However, in recent years, improved treatment of HIV infection with highly active antiretroviral therapy and control of HIV/AIDS because of improvement in the healthcare systems of developing countries in that region, such as mainland China, Thailand, and Vietnam, have led to a change in the epidemiology of T. marneffei infection, and there is an increasing number in immunocompromised non-HIV-infected patients 234. These are usually patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies associated with transplantation or autoimmune diseases and hematology patients treated with novel targeted therapies, including anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and kinase inhibitors 234– 236, but also patients with primary adult-onset immunodeficiency due to anti-interferon-gamma auto-antibodies 237. A donor-related transmission in a lung transplant recipient was also recently reported 238. Bamboo rats are considered the only identified natural reservoir so far, and transmission is believed to occur through conidia inhalation 234, 235. As patients with penicilliosis may present all over the world following global travelling, a good travel history is essential for clinical diagnosis 239.
The symptoms include fever, weight loss, anemia, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, respiratory signs, and often molluscum contagiosum-like skin lesions mostly on the face and neck, described as translucent papules, umbilicated with a central necrotic depression 235, 240. However, clinical diagnosis is challenging, especially in the absence of skin lesions and in non-HIV patients.
Laboratory diagnosis is based on histopathology, direct microscopy, and cultures. Blood cultures are frequently positive, and bone marrow cultures are positive in nearly all cases 241. The morphological identification is based on the characteristic colony of the mold phase of the fungus at 25°C with red pigment in the agar and yeast-like arthroconidia in the Gram stain of cultures at 37°C. This finding is crucial, as T. marneffei is the only dimorphic fungus in the Talaromyces genus. New techniques with much shorter turn-around times, such as real-time PCR and MALDI-TOF, are being developed with promising results 242, 243, but, as with the other rare fungi, increased sensitivity and an expanded database are required in order for them to be introduced into routine practice.
The treatment of choice is intravenous amphotericin B (liposomal formulation 3 to 5 mg/kg per day or lipid complex formulation 5 mg/kg per day) for 2 weeks, followed by oral itraconazole (400 mg/day) for 10 weeks; alternatively, voriconazole can be used (6 mg/kg twice a day on day 1, followed by 4 mg/kg twice a day for at least 12 weeks) 244, 245.
Conclusions
Rare fungal infectious agents have emerged as important pathogens in recent years because of the expanding population of immunocompromised patients. These fungi are ubiquitous saprobes or plant pathogens and lurk to invade any vulnerable host. The infections they cause are associated with high morbidity and mortality, whereas diagnosis and treatment are challenging. Early diagnosis is of paramount importance but requires a high index of clinical suspicion and accurate diagnostic methods. Conventional diagnostic methods such as direct microscopy, cultures, and histopathology are still essential, but rapid and more specific molecular techniques are needed for early targeted treatment. The currently used PCR-based methods and others, such as MALDI-TOF MS, appear promising but need optimization.
The management of invasive fungal infections is multimodal, and, whenever feasible, surgical debridement and reversal of risk factors are recommended. The efficacy of various antifungals is not uniform, and many of these infectious agents are intrinsically resistant to multiple drugs; in addition, recommendations are mainly based on clinical case experience. Combination treatment, though recommended as salvage therapy in some infections, is controversial in most cases. Despite the use of available antifungals, mortality remains high.
Editorial Note on the Review Process
F1000 Faculty Reviews are commissioned from members of the prestigious F1000 Faculty and are edited as a service to readers. In order to make these reviews as comprehensive and accessible as possible, the referees provide input before publication and only the final, revised version is published. The referees who approved the final version are listed with their names and affiliations but without their reports on earlier versions (any comments will already have been addressed in the published version).
The referees who approved this article are:
Flavio Queiroz-Telles, Division of Infectious Diseases, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
Tania C Sorrell, Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
Jean-Phillipe Bouchara, Groupe d'Etude des Interactions Hôte-Pathogène, Université d'Angers, Angers, EA 3142, France; Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d''Angers, Angers, France
Jacques Meis, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital(CWZ), and Centre of Expertise in Mycology Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, Netherlands
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
[version 1; referees: 4 approved]
References
- 1. Arendrup MC, Bruun B, Christensen JJ, et al. : National surveillance of fungemia in Denmark (2004 to 2009). J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(1):325–34. 10.1128/JCM.01811-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Chitasombat MN, Kofteridis DP, Jiang Y, et al. : Rare opportunistic (non- Candida, non- Cryptococcus) yeast bloodstream infections in patients with cancer. J Infect. 2012;64(1):68–75. 10.1016/j.jinf.2011.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Azie N, Neofytos D, Pfaller M, et al. : The PATH (Prospective Antifungal Therapy) Alliance® registry and invasive fungal infections: update 2012. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;73(4):293–300. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 4. Satoh K, Makimura K, Hasumi Y, et al. : Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol Immunol. 2009;53(1):41–4. 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2008.00083.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lee WG, Shin JH, Uh Y, et al. : First three reported cases of nosocomial fungemia caused by Candida auris. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(9):3139–42. 10.1128/JCM.00319-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Chowdhary A, Sharma C, Duggal S, et al. : New clonal strain of Candida auris, Delhi, India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(10):1670–3. 10.3201/eid1910.130393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chakrabarti A, Sood P, Rudramurthy SM, et al. : Incidence, characteristics and outcome of ICU-acquired candidemia in India. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(2):285–95. 10.1007/s00134-014-3603-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 8. Chowdhary A, Anil Kumar V, Sharma C, et al. : Multidrug-resistant endemic clonal strain of Candida auris in India. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(6):919–26. 10.1007/s10096-013-2027-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Magobo RE, Corcoran C, Seetharam S, et al. : Candida auris-associated candidemia, South Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(7):1250–1. 10.3201/eid2007.131765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Emara M, Ahmad S, Khan Z, et al. : Candida auris candidemia in Kuwait, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(6):1091–2. 10.3201/eid2106.150270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Vallabhaneni S, Kallen A, Tsay S, et al. : Investigation of the First Seven Reported Cases of Candida auris, a Globally Emerging Invasive, Multidrug-Resistant Fungus - United States, May 2013–August 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(44):1234–7. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6544e1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lockhart SR, Etienne KA, Vallabhaneni S, et al. : Simultaneous Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris on 3 Continents Confirmed by Whole-Genome Sequencing and Epidemiological Analyses. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(2):134–40. 10.1093/cid/ciw691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 13. Morales-López SE, Parra-Giraldo CM, Ceballos-Garzón A, et al. : Invasive Infections with Multidrug-Resistant Yeast Candida auris, Colombia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(1):162–4. 10.3201/eid2301.161497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 14. Ruiz Gaitán AC, Moret A, López Hontangas JL, et al. : Nosocomial fungemia by Candida auris: First four reported cases in continental Europe. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2017;34(1):23–7. 10.1016/j.riam.2016.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 15. Ben-Ami R, Berman J, Novikov A, et al. : Multidrug-Resistant Candida haemulonii and C. auris, Tel Aviv, Israel. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(1):195–203. 10.3201/eid2302.161486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 16. Schelenz S, Hagen F, Rhodes JL, et al. : First hospital outbreak of the globally emerging Candida auris in a European hospital. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016;5:35. 10.1186/s13756-016-0132-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Tsay S, Welsh RM, Adams EH, et al. : Notes from the Field: Ongoing Transmission of Candida auris in Health Care Facilities - United States, June 2016–May 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(19):514–5. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6619a7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Sharma C, Kumar N, Pandey R, et al. : Whole genome sequencing of emerging multidrug resistant Candida auris isolates in India demonstrates low genetic variation. New Microbes New Infect. 2016;13:77–82. 10.1016/j.nmni.2016.07.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 19. Chatterjee S, Alampalli SV, Nageshan RK, et al. : Draft genome of a commonly misdiagnosed multidrug resistant pathogen Candida auris. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:686. 10.1186/s12864-015-1863-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 20. Kathuria S, Singh PK, Sharma C, et al. : Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris Misidentified as Candida haemulonii: Characterization by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry and DNA Sequencing and Its Antifungal Susceptibility Profile Variability by Vitek 2, CLSI Broth Microdilution, and Etest Method. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(6):1823–30. 10.1128/JCM.00367-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Mizusawa M, Miller H, Green R, et al. : Can Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris Be Reliably Identified in Clinical Microbiology Laboratories? J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(2):638–40. 10.1128/JCM.02202-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Chowdhary A, Sharma C, Meis JF: Candida auris: A rapidly emerging cause of hospital-acquired multidrug-resistant fungal infections globally. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(5):e1006290. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Larkin E, Hager C, Chandra J, et al. : The Emerging Pathogen Candida auris: Growth Phenotype, Virulence Factors, Activity of Antifungals, and Effect of SCY-078, a Novel Glucan Synthesis Inhibitor, on Growth Morphology and Biofilm Formation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(5): pii: e02396-16. 10.1128/AAC.02396-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 24. Calvo B, Melo AS, Perozo-Mena A, et al. : First report of Candida auris in America: Clinical and microbiological aspects of 18 episodes of candidemia. J Infect. 2016;73(4):369–74. 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. CDC: . Candida auris interim recommendations for healthcare facilities and laboratories. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC;2017. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 26. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Candida auris in healthcare settings. - Europe – 19 December 2016. Stockholm: ECDC;2016. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kontoyiannis DP, Torres HA, Chagua M, et al. : Trichosporonosis in a tertiary care cancer center: risk factors, changing spectrum and determinants of outcome. Scand J Infect Dis. 2004;36(8):564–9. 10.1080/00365540410017563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Liao Y, Lu X, Yang S, et al. : Epidemiology and Outcome of Trichosporon Fungemia: A Review of 185 Reported Cases From 1975 to 2014. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015;2(4):ofv141. 10.1093/ofid/ofv141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 29. de Almeida Júnior JN, Hennequin C: Invasive Trichosporon Infection: a Systematic Review on a Re-emerging Fungal Pathogen. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1629. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 30. Piérard GE, Read D, Piérard-Franchimont C, et al. : Cutaneous manifestations in systemic trichosporonosis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1992;17(2):79–82. 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1992.tb00169.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Colombo AL, Padovan AC, Chaves GM: Current knowledge of Trichosporon spp. and Trichosporonosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24(4):682–700. 10.1128/CMR.00003-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ruan SY, Chien JY, Hsueh PR: Invasive trichosporonosis caused by Trichosporon asahii and other unusual Trichosporon species at a medical center in Taiwan. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(1):e11–7. 10.1086/599614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kumar A, Udayakumaran S, Babu R, et al. : Trichosporon asahii infection presenting as chronic meningo-ventriculitis and intra ventricular fungal ball: a case report and literature review. Mycoses. 2015;58(2):99–103. 10.1111/myc.12282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 34. Chen YT, Yang WC, Chen TW, et al. : Trichosporon mucoides peritonitis in a continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patient. Perit Dial Int. 2013;33(3):341–2. 10.3747/pdi.2012.00146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Rastogi V, Honnavar P, Rudramurthy SM, et al. : Molecular characterisation and antifungal susceptibility of clinical Trichosporon isolates in India. Mycoses. 2016;59(8):528–34. 10.1111/myc.12511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Shinozaki M, Okubo Y, Sasai D, et al. : Development of a peptide nucleic acid probe to Trichosporon species and identification of trichosporonosis by use of in situ hybridization in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(1):295–8. 10.1128/JCM.02221-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Melcher GP, Reed KD, Rinaldi MG, et al. : Demonstration of a cell wall antigen cross-reacting with cryptococcal polysaccharide in experimental disseminated trichosporonosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(1):192–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Fekkar A, Brun S, D'Ussel M, et al. : Serum cross-reactivity with Aspergillus galactomannan and cryptococcal antigen during fatal disseminated Trichosporon dermatis infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(9):1457–8. 10.1086/644499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Liao Y, Hartmann T, Ao JH, et al. : Serum glucuronoxylomannan may be more appropriate for the diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of Trichosporon fungemia than serum β-D-glucan. Int J Infect Dis. 2012;16(8):e638. 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Arendrup MC, Boekhout T, Akova M, et al. : ESCMID and ECMM joint clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of rare invasive yeast infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20 Suppl 3:76–98. 10.1111/1469-0691.12360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Hazirolan G, Canton E, Sahin S, et al. : Head-to-head comparison of inhibitory and fungicidal activities of fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole against clinical isolates of Trichosporon asahii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(10):4841–7. 10.1128/AAC.00850-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Tsai MS, Yang YL, Wang AH, et al. : Susceptibilities to amphotericin B, fluconazole and voriconazole of Trichosporon clinical isolates. Mycopathologia. 2012;174(2):121–30. 10.1007/s11046-012-9525-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Girmenia C, Pagano L, Martino B, et al. : Invasive infections caused by Trichosporon species and Geotrichum capitatum in patients with hematological malignancies: a retrospective multicenter study from Italy and review of the literature. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(4):1818–28. 10.1128/JCM.43.4.1818-1828.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Desnos-Ollivier M, Blanc C, Garcia-Hermoso D, et al. : Misidentification of Saprochaete clavata as Magnusiomyces capitatus in clinical isolates: utility of internal transcribed spacer sequencing and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and importance of reliable databases. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(6):2196–8. 10.1128/JCM.00039-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. De Hoog GS, Smith MT: Ribosomal gene phylogeny and species delimitation in Geotrichum and its teleomorphs. Stud Mycol. 2004;50:489–515. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 46. Bouza E, Muñoz P: Invasive infections caused by Blastoschizomyces capitatus and Scedosporium spp. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10 Suppl 1:76–85. 10.1111/j.1470-9465.2004.00842.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Gurgui M, Sanchez F, March F, et al. : Nosocomial outbreak of Blastoschizomyces capitatus associated with contaminated milk in a haematological unit. J Hosp Infect. 2011;78(4):274–8. 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.01.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Pottier I, Gente S, Vernoux JP, et al. : Safety assessment of dairy microorganisms: Geotrichum candidum. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008;126(3):327–32. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.08.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Martino R, Salavert M, Parody R, et al. : Blastoschizomyces capitatus infection in patients with leukemia: report of 26 cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38(3):335–41. 10.1086/380643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Birrenbach T, Bertschy S, Aebersold F, et al. : Emergence of Blastoschizomyces capitatus yeast infections, Central Europe. Emerging Infect Dis. 2012;18(1):98–101. 10.3201/eid1801.111192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Subramanya Supram H, Gokhale S, Chakrabarti A, et al. : Emergence of Magnusiomyces capitatus infections in Western Nepal. Med Mycol. 2016;54(2):103–10. 10.1093/mmy/myv075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 52. García-Ruiz JC, López-Soria L, Olazábal I, et al. : Invasive infections caused by Saprochaete capitata in patients with haematological malignancies: report of five cases and review of the antifungal therapy. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2013;30(4):248–55. 10.1016/j.riam.2013.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. D'Antonio D, Mazzoni A, Iacone A, et al. : Emergence of fluconazole-resistant strains of Blastoschizomyces capitatus causing nosocomial infections in cancer patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34(3):753–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Vaux S, Criscuolo A, Desnos-Ollivier M, et al. : Multicenter outbreak of infections by Saprochaete clavata, an unrecognized opportunistic fungal pathogen. mBio. 2014;5(6): pii: e02309-14. 10.1128/mBio.02309-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Levy J, Benharroch D, Peled N, et al. : Blastoschizomyces capitatus keratitis and melting in a corneal graft. Can J Ophthalmol. 2006;41(6):772–4. 10.3129/i06-076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Celik AD, Ozaras R, Kantarcioglu S, et al. : Spondylodiscitis due to an emergent fungal pathogen: Blastoschizomyces capitatus, a case report and review of the literature. Rheumatol Int. 2009;29(10):1237–41. 10.1007/s00296-009-0928-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Giacchino M, Chiapello N, Bezzio S, et al. : Aspergillus galactomannan enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay cross-reactivity caused by invasive Geotrichum capitatum. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(9):3432–4. 10.1128/JCM.00856-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Bonini A, Capatti C, Parmeggiani M, et al. : Galactomannan detection in Geotrichum capitatum invasive infections: report of 2 new cases and review of diagnostic options. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;62(4):450–2. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Devadas SK, Bhat V, Khattry N: Subcutaneous infection caused by Blastoschizomyces capitatus post allogeneic hematopoietic transplant and its successful treatment with voriconazole. Transpl Infect Dis. 2015;17(4):588–92. 10.1111/tid.12404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 60. Mazzocato S, Marchionni E, Fothergill AW, et al. : Epidemiology and outcome of systemic infections due to saprochaete capitata: case report and review of the literature. Infection. 2015;43(2):211–5. 10.1007/s15010-014-0668-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Wirth F, Goldani LZ: Epidemiology of Rhodotorula: an emerging pathogen. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2012;2012: 465717. 10.1155/2012/465717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Hagan ME, Klotz SA, Bartholomew W, et al. : A pseudoepidemic of Rhodotorula rubra: a marker for microbial contamination of the bronchoscope. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995;16(12):727–8. 10.2307/30141917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. De Almeida GM, Costa SF, Melhem M, et al. : Rhodotorula spp. isolated from blood cultures: clinical and microbiological aspects. Med Mycol. 2008;46(6):547–56. 10.1080/13693780801972490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Tuon FF, Costa SF: Rhodotorula infection. A systematic review of 128 cases from literature. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2008;25(3):135–40. 10.1016/S1130-1406(08)70032-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Lo Re V, Fishman NO, Nachamkin I: Recurrent catheter-related Rhodotorula rubra infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003;9(8):897–900. 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00641.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Lunardi LW, Aquino VR, Zimerman RA, et al. : Epidemiology and outcome of Rhodotorula fungemia in a tertiary care hospital. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(6):e60–3. 10.1086/507036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Tuon FF, de Almeida GM, Costa SF: Central venous catheter-associated fungemia due to Rhodotorula spp. --a systematic review. Med Mycol. 2007;45(5):441–7. 10.1080/13693780701381289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Kim HA, Hyun M, Ryu SY: Catheter-Associated Rhodotorula mucilaginosa Fungemia in an Immunocompetent Host. Infect Chemother. 2013;45(3):339–42. 10.3947/ic.2013.45.3.339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Simon MS, Somersan S, Singh HK, et al. : Endocarditis caused by Rhodotorula infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(1):374–8. 10.1128/JCM.01950-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Maeder M, Vogt PR, Schaer G, et al. : Aortic homograft endocarditis caused by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. Infection. 2003;31(3):181–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Soylu A, Demircioğlu F, Türkmen M, et al. : Unusual cause of peritonitis during peritoneal dialysis. Rhodotorula rubra and amphotericin B. Pediatr Nephrol. 2004;19(12):1426–8. 10.1007/s00467-004-1600-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Tsiodras S, Papageorgiou S, Meletiadis J, et al. : Rhodotorula mucilaginosa associacted meningitis: A subacute entity with high mortality. Case report and review. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2014;6:46–50. 10.1016/j.mmcr.2014.08.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Merkur AB, Hodge WG: Rhodotorula rubra endophthalmitis in an HIV positive patient. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(12):1444–5. 10.1136/bjo.86.12.1444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Spiliopoulou A, Anastassiou ED, Christofidou M: Rhodotorula fungemia of an intensive care unit patient and review of published cases. Mycopathologia. 2012;174(4):301–9. 10.1007/s11046-012-9552-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Villar JM, Velasco CG, Delgado JD: Fungemia due to Rhodotorula mucilaginosa in an immunocompetent, critically ill patient. J Infect Chemother. 2012;18(4):581–3. 10.1007/s10156-011-0347-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Gomez-Lopez A, Mellado E, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, et al. : Susceptibility profile of 29 clinical isolates of Rhodotorula spp. and literature review. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;55(3):312–6. 10.1093/jac/dki020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Diekema DJ, Petroelje B, Messer SA, et al. : Activities of available and investigational antifungal agents against Rhodotorula species. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(1):476–8. 10.1128/JCM.43.1.476-478.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 78. Mori T, Nakamura Y, Kato J, et al. : Fungemia due to Rhodotorula mucilaginosa after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2012;14(1):91–4. 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2011.00647.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Enache-Angoulvant A, Hennequin C: Invasive Saccharomyces infection: a comprehensive review. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(11):1559–68. 10.1086/497832 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Edwards-Ingram L, Gitsham P, Burton N, et al. : Genotypic and physiological characterization of Saccharomyces boulardii, the probiotic strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(8):2458–67. 10.1128/AEM.02201-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. McCullough MJ, Clemons KV, McCusker JH, et al. : Species identification and virulence attributes of Saccharomyces boulardii (nom. inval.). J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(9):2613–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Thygesen JB, Glerup H, Tarp B: Saccharomyces boulardii fungemia caused by treatment with a probioticum. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012: pii: bcr0620114412. 10.1136/bcr.06.2011.4412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Stefanatou E, Kompoti M, Paridou A, et al. : Probiotic sepsis due to Saccharomyces fungaemia in a critically ill burn patient. Mycoses. 2011;54(5):e643–6. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2010.01963.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Salonen JH, Richardson MD, Gallacher K, et al. : Fungal colonization of haematological patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy: emergence of azole-resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Hosp Infect. 2000;45(4):293–301. 10.1053/jhin.1999.0718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Marteau PR, de Vrese M, Cellier CJ, et al. : Protection from gastrointestinal diseases with the use of probiotics. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73(2 Suppl):430S–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Lherm T, Monet C, Nougière B, et al. : Seven cases of fungemia with Saccharomyces boulardii in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(6):797–801. 10.1007/s00134-002-1267-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Muñoz P, Bouza E, Cuenca-Estrella M, et al. : Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia: an emerging infectious disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(11):1625–34. 10.1086/429916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Cassone M, Serra P, Mondello F, et al. : Outbreak of Saccharomyces cerevisiae subtype boulardii fungemia in patients neighboring those treated with a probiotic preparation of the organism. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(11):5340–3. 10.1128/JCM.41.11.5340-5343.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Olver WJ, James SA, Lennard A, et al. : Nosocomial transmission of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in bone marrow transplant patients. J Hosp Infect. 2002;52(4):268–72. 10.1053/jhin.2002.1314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Hennequin C, Kauffmann-Lacroix C, Jobert A, et al. : Possible role of catheters in Saccharomyces boulardii fungemia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;19(1):16–20. 10.1007/s100960050003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Yoshida M, Obayashi T, Iwama A, et al. : Detection of plasma (1 --> 3)-beta-D-glucan in patients with Fusarium, Trichosporon, Saccharomyces and Acremonium fungaemias. J Med Vet Mycol. 1997;35(5):371–4. 10.1080/02681219780001441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Odabasi Z, Paetznick VL, Rodriguez JR, et al. : Differences in beta-glucan levels in culture supernatants of a variety of fungi. Med Mycol. 2006;44(3):267–72. 10.1080/13693780500474327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Rahn S, Schuck A, Kondakci M, et al. : A novel comprehensive set of fungal Real time PCR assays (fuPCR) for the detection of fungi in immunocompromised haematological patients-A pilot study. Int J Med Microbiol. 2016;306(8):611–23. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2016.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 94. Lolis N, Veldekis D, Moraitou H, et al. : Saccharomyces boulardii fungaemia in an intensive care unit patient treated with caspofungin. Crit Care. 2008;12(2):414. 10.1186/cc6843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Choi G, Meijer SL, Hazenberg MD: Disseminated bread yeast fungaemia in a baker’s wife with acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2012;158(3):298. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09212.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Findley K, Oh J, Yang J, et al. : Topographic diversity of fungal and bacterial communities in human skin. Nature. 2013;498(7454):367–70. 10.1038/nature12171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 97. Gaitanis G, Magiatis P, Hantschke M, et al. : The Malassezia genus in skin and systemic diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25(1):106–41. 10.1128/CMR.00021-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Chryssanthou E, Broberger U, Petrini B: Malassezia pachydermatis fungaemia in a neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Paediatr. 2001;90(3):323–7. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2001.tb00312.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Chang HJ, Miller HL, Watkins N, et al. : An epidemic of Malassezia pachydermatis in an intensive care nursery associated with colonization of health care workers’ pet dogs. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(11):706–11. 10.1056/NEJM199803123381102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Surmont I, Gavilanes A, Vandepitte J, et al. : Malassezia furfur fungaemia in infants receiving intravenous lipid emulsions. A rarity or just underestimated? Eur J Pediatr. 1989;148(5):435–8. 10.1007/BF00595906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Tragiannidis A, Bisping G, Koehler G, et al. : Minireview: Malassezia infections in immunocompromised patients. Mycoses. 2010;53(3):187–95. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01814.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Kwon-Chung KJ: Taxonomy of fungi causing mucormycosis and entomophthoramycosis (zygomycosis) and nomenclature of the disease: molecular mycologic perspectives. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(Suppl 1):S8–S15. 10.1093/cid/cir864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 103. Chakrabarti A, Chatterjee SS, Das A, et al. : Invasive zygomycosis in India: experience in a tertiary care hospital. Postgrad Med J. 2009;85(1009):573–81. 10.1136/pgmj.2008.076463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 104. Chander J, Singla N, Kaur M, et al. : Saksenaea erythrospora, an emerging mucoralean fungus causing severe necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections - a study from a tertiary care hospital in north India. Infect Dis (Lond). 2017;49(3):170–7. 10.1080/23744235.2016.1239027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Gomes MZ, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP: Mucormycosis caused by unusual mucormycetes, non- Rhizopus, - Mucor, and - Lichtheimia species. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24(2):411–45. 10.1128/CMR.00056-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 106. Ibrahim AS, Spellberg B, Walsh TJ, et al. : Pathogenesis of mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(Suppl 1):S16–22. 10.1093/cid/cir865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Petrikkos G, Skiada A, Lortholary O, et al. : Epidemiology and clinical manifestations of mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(Suppl 1):S23–34. 10.1093/cid/cir866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Skiada A, Pagano L, Groll A, et al. : Zygomycosis in Europe: analysis of 230 cases accrued by the registry of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) Working Group on Zygomycosis between 2005 and 2007. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(12):1859–67. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03456.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Chamilos G, Marom EM, Lewis RE, et al. : Predictors of pulmonary zygomycosis versus invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(1):60–6. 10.1086/430710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Legouge C, Caillot D, Chrétien ML, et al. : The reversed halo sign: pathognomonic pattern of pulmonary mucormycosis in leukemic patients with neutropenia? Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(5):672–8. 10.1093/cid/cit929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 111. Jung J, Kim MY, Lee HJ, et al. : Comparison of computed tomographic findings in pulmonary mucormycosis and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(7):684.e11–8. 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.03.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 112. Georgiadou SP, Sipsas NV, Marom EM, et al. : The diagnostic value of halo and reversed halo signs for invasive mold infections in compromised hosts. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(9):1144–55. 10.1093/cid/cir122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Haurany N, Kontoyiannis DP, Slavin MA, et al. : 4th Advances Against Aspergillosis. Rome, Italy: 2010. Interobserver reproducibility and concordance between culture and histopathology in invasive mold infections: a multicenter study [abstract 78] Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 114. Shah AA, Hazen KC: Diagnostic accuracy of histopathologic and cytopathologic examination of Aspergillus species. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;139(1):55–61. 10.1309/AJCPO8VTSK3HRNUT [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Rickerts V, Mousset S, Lambrecht E, et al. : Comparison of histopathological analysis, culture, and polymerase chain reaction assays to detect invasive mold infections from biopsy specimens. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(8):1078–83. 10.1086/512812 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 116. Hammond SP, Bialek R, Milner DA, et al. : Molecular methods to improve diagnosis and identification of mucormycosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(6):2151–3. 10.1128/JCM.00256-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 117. Dannaoui E: Molecular tools for identification of Zygomycetes and the diagnosis of zygomycosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15(Suppl 5):66–70. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02983.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Bialek R, Konrad F, Kern J, et al. : PCR based identification and discrimination of agents of mucormycosis and aspergillosis in paraffin wax embedded tissue. J Clin Pathol. 2005;58(11):1180–4. 10.1136/jcp.2004.024703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Rickerts V, Just-Nübling G, Konrad F, et al. : Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis in immunocompromised patients by seminested PCR assay of tissue samples. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;25(1):8–13. 10.1007/s10096-005-0078-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Salehi E, Hedayati MT, Zoll J, et al. : Discrimination of Aspergillosis, Mucormycosis, Fusariosis, and Scedosporiosis in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Specimens by Use of Multiple Real-Time Quantitative PCR Assays. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(11):2798–803. 10.1128/JCM.01185-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 121. Dannaoui E, Schwarz P, Slany M, et al. : Molecular detection and identification of zygomycetes species from paraffin-embedded tissues in a murine model of disseminated zygomycosis: a collaborative European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Fungal Infection Study Group (EFISG) evaluation. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(6):2043–6. 10.1128/JCM.02319-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 122. Hofman V, Dhouibi A, Butori C, et al. : Usefulness of molecular biology performed with formaldehyde-fixed paraffin embedded tissue for the diagnosis of combined pulmonary invasive mucormycosis and aspergillosis in an immunocompromised patient. Diagn Pathol. 2010;5:1. 10.1186/1746-1596-5-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Drogari-Apiranthitou M, Panayiotides I, Galani I, et al. : Diagnostic value of a semi-nested PCR for the diagnosis of mucormycosis and aspergillosis from paraffin-embedded tissue: A single center experience. Pathol Res Pract. 2016;212(5):393–7. 10.1016/j.prp.2016.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Millon L, Larosa F, Lepiller Q, et al. : Quantitative polymerase chain reaction detection of circulating DNA in serum for early diagnosis of mucormycosis in immunocompromised patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(10):e95–101. 10.1093/cid/cit094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 125. Kasai M, Harrington SM, Francesconi A, et al. : Detection of a molecular biomarker for zygomycetes by quantitative PCR assays of plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage, and lung tissue in a rabbit model of experimental pulmonary zygomycosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(11):3690–702. 10.1128/JCM.00917-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Walsh TJ, Gamaletsou MN, McGinnis MR, et al. : Early clinical and laboratory diagnosis of invasive pulmonary, extrapulmonary, and disseminated mucormycosis (zygomycosis). Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(Suppl 1):S55–60. 10.1093/cid/cir868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Tissot F, Agrawal S, Pagano L, et al. : ECIL-6 guidelines for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, aspergillosis and mucormycosis in leukemia and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Haematologica. 2017;102(3):433–44. 10.3324/haematol.2016.152900 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Cornely OA, Arikan-Akdagli S, Dannaoui E, et al. : ESCMID and ECMM joint clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of mucormycosis 2013. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(Suppl 3):5–26. 10.1111/1469-0691.12371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 129. Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Castelli MV, Cuesta I, et al. : Activity of posaconazole and other antifungal agents against Mucorales strains identified by sequencing of internal transcribed spacers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(4):1686–9. 10.1128/AAC.01467-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Almyroudis NG, Sutton DA, Fothergill AW, et al. : In vitro susceptibilities of 217 clinical isolates of zygomycetes to conventional and new antifungal agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(7):2587–90. 10.1128/AAC.00452-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 131. Lamoth F, Damonti L, Alexander BD: Role of Antifungal Susceptibility Testing in Non- Aspergillus Invasive Mold Infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(6):1638–40. 10.1128/JCM.00318-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 132. Marty FM, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Cornely OA, et al. : Isavuconazole treatment for mucormycosis: a single-arm open-label trial and case-control analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(7):828–37. 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00071-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 133. Kyvernitakis A, Torres HA, Jiang Y, et al. : Initial use of combination treatment does not impact survival of 106 patients with haematologic malignancies and mucormycosis: a propensity score analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(9):811.e1–811.e8. 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.03.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 134. Spellberg B, Ibrahim AS, Chin-Hong PV, et al. : The Deferasirox-AmBisome Therapy for Mucormycosis (DEFEAT Mucor) study: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(3):715–22. 10.1093/jac/dkr375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 135. Ibrahim AS, Gebermariam T, Fu Y, et al. : The iron chelator deferasirox protects mice from mucormycosis through iron starvation. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(9):2649–57. 10.1172/JCI32338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 136. Jensen TSR, Arendrup MC, von Buchvald C, et al. : Successful Treatment of Rhino-Orbital-Cerebral Mucormycosis in a Child With Leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2017;39(4):e211–e215. 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Gil-Lamaignere C, Simitsopoulou M, Roilides E, et al. : Interferon- gamma and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor augment the activity of polymorphonuclear leukocytes against medically important zygomycetes. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(7):1180–7. 10.1086/428503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Smith SN: An Overview of Ecological and Habitat Aspects in the Genus Fusarium with Special Emphasis on the Soil-Borne Pathogenic Forms. Plant Pathol Bull. 2007;16:97–120. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 139. Salah H, Al-Hatmi AM, Theelen B, et al. : Phylogenetic diversity of human pathogenic Fusarium and emergence of uncommon virulent species. J Infect. 2015;71(6):658–66. 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Al-Hatmi AM, Meis JF, de Hoog GS: Fusarium: Molecular Diversity and Intrinsic Drug Resistance. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(4):e1005464. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Nucci M, Anaissie E: Fusarium infections in immunocompromised patients. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(4):695–704. 10.1128/CMR.00014-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Słowik M, Biernat MM, Urbaniak-Kujda D, et al. : Mycotic Infections of the Eye. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015;24(6):1113–7. 10.17219/acem/50572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Dóczi I, Gyetvai T, Kredics L, et al. : Involvement of Fusarium spp. in fungal keratitis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10(9):773–6. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00909.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Kalkanci A, Ozdek S: Ocular fungal infections. Curr Eye Res. 2011;36(3):179–89. 10.3109/02713683.2010.533810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Oechsler RA, Yamanaka TM, Bispo PJ, et al. : Fusarium keratitis in Brazil: genotyping, in vitro susceptibilities, and clinical outcomes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1693–701. 10.2147/OPTH.S40063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Epstein AB: In the aftermath of the Fusarium keratitis outbreak: What have we learned? Clin Ophthalmol. 2007;1(4):355–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Tuft SJ, Tullo AB: Fungal keratitis in the United Kingdom 2003–2005. Eye (Lond). 2009;23(6):1308–13. 10.1038/eye.2008.298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Ong HS, Fung SSM, Macleod D, et al. : Altered Patterns of Fungal Keratitis at a London Ophthalmic Referral Hospital: An Eight-Year Retrospective Observational Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;168:227–36. 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.05.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 149. Shukla PK, Kumar M, Keshava GB: Mycotic keratitis: an overview of diagnosis and therapy. Mycoses. 2008;51(3):183–99. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01480.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Dignani MC, Anaissie E: Human fusariosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10(Suppl 1):67–75. 10.1111/j.1470-9465.2004.00845.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Tortorano AM, Richardson M, Roilides E, et al. : ESCMID and ECMM joint guidelines on diagnosis and management of hyalohyphomycosis: Fusarium spp., Scedosporium spp. and others. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(Suppl 3):27–46. 10.1111/1469-0691.12465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Raad I, Tarrand J, Hanna H, et al. : Epidemiology, molecular mycology, and environmental sources of Fusarium infection in patients with cancer. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23(9):532–7. 10.1086/502102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Nucci M, Anaissie E: Cutaneous infection by Fusarium species in healthy and immunocompromised hosts: implications for diagnosis and management. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35(8):909–20. 10.1086/342328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Nucci F, Nouér SA, Capone D, et al. : Fusariosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36(5):706–14. 10.1055/s-0035-1562897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Park BJ, et al. : Prospective surveillance for invasive fungal infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, 2001-2006: overview of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET) Database. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(8):1091–100. 10.1086/651263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 156. Pagano L, Caira M, Nosari A, et al. : Fungal infections in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplants: results of the SEIFEM B-2004 study--Sorveglianza Epidemiologica Infezioni Fungine Nelle Emopatie Maligne. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(9):1161–70. 10.1086/522189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Pagano L, Caira M, Candoni A, et al. : The epidemiology of fungal infections in patients with hematologic malignancies: the SEIFEM-2004 study. Haematologica. 2006;91(8):1068–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Nucci M, Garnica M, Gloria AB, et al. : Invasive fungal diseases in haematopoietic cell transplant recipients and in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplasia in Brazil. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(8):745–51. 10.1111/1469-0691.12002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Nucci M, Varon AG, Garnica M, et al. : Increased incidence of invasive fusariosis with cutaneous portal of entry, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(10):1567–72. 10.3201/eid1910.120847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Varon AG, Nouer SA, Barreiros G, et al. : Superficial skin lesions positive for Fusarium are associated with subsequent development of invasive fusariosis. J Infect. 2014;68(1):85–9. 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Anaissie EJ, Kuchar RT, Rex JH, et al. : Fusariosis associated with pathogenic fusarium species colonization of a hospital water system: a new paradigm for the epidemiology of opportunistic mold infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(11):1871–8. 10.1086/324501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 162. O'Donnell K, Sutton DA, Rinaldi MG, et al. : Genetic diversity of human pathogenic members of the Fusarium oxysporum complex inferred from multilocus DNA sequence data and amplified fragment length polymorphism analyses: evidence for the recent dispersion of a geographically widespread clonal lineage and nosocomial origin. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(11):5109–20. 10.1128/JCM.42.11.5109-5120.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Tortorano AM, Prigitano A, Esposto MC, et al. : European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) epidemiological survey on invasive infections due to Fusarium species in Europe. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(9):1623–30. 10.1007/s10096-014-2111-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Al-Hatmi AM, Normand AC, van Diepeningen AD, et al. : Rapid identification of clinical members of Fusarium fujikuroi complex using MALDI-TOF MS. Future Microbiol. 2015;10(12):1939–52. 10.2217/fmb.15.108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Bernal-Martínez L, Buitrago MJ, Castelli MV, et al. : Detection of invasive infection caused by Fusarium solani and non- Fusarium solani species using a duplex quantitative PCR-based assay in a murine model of fusariosis. Med Mycol. 2012;50(3):270–5. 10.3109/13693786.2011.604047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Gu Z, Buelow DR, Petraitiene R, et al. : Quantitative multiplexed detection of common pulmonary fungal pathogens by labeled primer polymerase chain reaction. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138(11):1474–80. 10.5858/arpa.2013-0592-OA [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Espinel-Ingroff A, Colombo AL, Cordoba S, et al. : International Evaluation of MIC Distributions and Epidemiological Cutoff Value (ECV) Definitions for Fusarium Species Identified by Molecular Methods for the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(2):1079–84. 10.1128/AAC.02456-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 168. Nucci M, Marr KA, Vehreschild MJ, et al. : Improvement in the outcome of invasive fusariosis in the last decade. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(6):580–5. 10.1111/1469-0691.12409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Panackal AA, Marr KA: Scedosporium/Pseudallescheria infections. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;25(2):171–81. 10.1055/s-2004-824901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Harun A, Perdomo H, Gilgado F, et al. : Genotyping of Scedosporium species: a review of molecular approaches. Med Mycol. 2009;47(4):406–14. 10.1080/13693780802510240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Cortez KJ, Roilides E, Quiroz-Telles F, et al. : Infections caused by Scedosporium spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(1):157–97. 10.1128/CMR.00039-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Lackner M, de Hoog GS, Yang L, et al. : Proposed nomenclature for Pseudallescheria, Scedosporium and related genera. Fungal Divers. 2014;67(1):1–10. 10.1007/s13225-014-0295-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 173. de Hoog GS, Haase G, Chaturvedi V, et al. : Taxonomy of medically important fungi in the molecular era. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(5):385–6. 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70058-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Blyth CC, Middleton PG, Harun A, et al. : Clinical associations and prevalence of Scedosporium spp. in Australian cystic fibrosis patients: identification of novel risk factors? Med Mycol. 2010;48(Suppl 1):S37–44. 10.3109/13693786.2010.500627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Zouhair R, Rougeron A, Razafimandimby B, et al. : Distribution of the different species of the Pseudallescheria boydii/Scedosporium apiospermum complex in French patients with cystic fibrosis. Med Mycol. 2013;51(6):603–13. 10.3109/13693786.2013.770606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Kantarcioglu AS, Guarro J, de Hoog GS: Central nervous system infections by members of the Pseudallescheria boydii species complex in healthy and immunocompromised hosts: epidemiology, clinical characteristics and outcome. Mycoses. 2008;51(4):275–90. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01489.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Pagano L, Caira M, Falcucci P, et al. : Fungal CNS infections in patients with hematologic malignancy. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2005;3(5):775–85. 10.1586/14787210.3.5.775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Katragkou A, Dotis J, Kotsiou M, et al. : Scedosporium apiospermum infection after near-drowning. Mycoses. 2007;50(5):412–21. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01388.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Rüchel R, Wilichowski E: Cerebral Pseudallescheria mycosis after near-drowning. Mycoses. 1995;38(11–12):473–5. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1995.tb00022.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Leechawengwongs M, Milindankura S, Liengudom A, et al. : Multiple Scedosporium apiospermum brain abscesses after near-drowning successfully treated with surgery and long-term voriconazole: a case report. Mycoses. 2007;50(6):512–6. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01410.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Mesfin FB, Tobin E, Adamo MA, et al. : Fungal vertebral osteomyelitis due to Scedosporium apiospermum after near-drowning. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9(1):58–61. 10.3171/SPI/2008/9/7/058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Nakamura Y, Utsumi Y, Suzuki N, et al. : Multiple Scedosporium apiospermum abscesses in a woman survivor of a tsunami in northeastern Japan: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2011;5:526. 10.1186/1752-1947-5-526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Shimizu J, Yoshimoto M, Takebayashi T, et al. : Atypical fungal vertebral osteomyelitis in a tsunami survivor of the Great East Japan Earthquake. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(12):E739–42. 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. He XH, Wu JY, Wu CJ, et al. : Scedosporium Apiospermum Infection after Near-drowning. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015;128(15):2119–23. 10.4103/0366-6999.161401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 185. Chen TC, Ho MW, Chien WC, et al. : Disseminated Scedosporium apiospermum infection in a near-drowning patient. J Formos Med Assoc. 2016;115(3):213–4. 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 186. Kim SH, Ha YE, Youn JC, et al. : Fatal scedosporiosis in multiple solid organ allografts transmitted from a nearly-drowned donor. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(3):833–40. 10.1111/ajt.13008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 187. Leek R, Aldag E, Nadeem I, et al. : Scedosporiosis in a Combined Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipient: A Case Report of Possible Transmission from a Near-Drowning Donor. Case Rep Transplant. 2016;2016: 1879529. 10.1155/2016/1879529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 188. Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Berenguer J, Guarro J, et al. : Epidemiology and outcome of Scedosporium prolificans infection, a review of 162 cases. Med Mycol. 2009;47(4):359–70. 10.1080/13693780802524506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189. Hennebert GL, Desai BG: Lomentospora prolificans, a new hyphomycete from greenhouse soil. Mycotaxon. 1974;1(1):45–50. [Google Scholar]
- 190. Lackner M, de Hoog GS: Scedosporium spp.: emerging agents of systemic disease. J Invasive Fungal Infect. 2011;5(2): 43–7. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 191. Meletiadis J, Meis JF, Mouton JW, et al. : In vitro activities of new and conventional antifungal agents against clinical Scedosporium isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(1):62–8. 10.1128/AAC.46.1.62-68.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 192. Schemuth H, Dittmer S, Lackner M, et al. : In vitro activity of colistin as single agent and in combination with antifungals against filamentous fungi occurring in patients with cystic fibrosis. Mycoses. 2013;56(3):297–303. 10.1111/myc.12022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193. Howden BP, Slavin MA, Schwarer AP, et al. : Successful control of disseminated Scedosporium prolificans infection with a combination of voriconazole and terbinafine. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;22(2):111–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194. Bhat SV, Paterson DL, Rinaldi MG, et al. : Scedosporium prolificans brain abscess in a patient with chronic granulomatous disease: successful combination therapy with voriconazole and terbinafine. Scand J Infect Dis. 2007;39(1):87–90. 10.1080/00365540600786564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Tong SY, Peleg AY, Yoong J, et al. : Breakthrough Scedosporium prolificans infection while receiving voriconazole prophylaxis in an allogeneic stem cell transplant recipient. Transpl Infect Dis. 2007;9(3):241–3. 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2007.00203.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Gosbell IB, Toumasatos V, Yong J, et al. : Cure of orthopaedic infection with Scedosporium prolificans, using voriconazole plus terbinafine, without the need for radical surgery. Mycoses. 2003;46(5–6):233–6. 10.1046/j.1439-0507.2003.00878.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197. Li JY, Yong TY, Grove DI, et al. : Successful control of Scedosporium prolificans septic arthritis and probable osteomyelitis without radical surgery in a long-term renal transplant recipient. Transpl Infect Dis. 2008;10(1):63–5. 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2007.00240.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198. Borman AM, Palmer MD, Delhaes L, et al. : Lack of standardization in the procedures for mycological examination of sputum samples from CF patients: a possible cause for variations in the prevalence of filamentous fungi. Med Mycol. 2010;48 Suppl 1:S88–97. 10.3109/13693786.2010.511287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199. Schwartz S, Reisman A, Troke PF: The efficacy of voriconazole in the treatment of 192 fungal central nervous system infections: a retrospective analysis. Infection. 2011;39(3):201–10. 10.1007/s15010-011-0108-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200. Verweij PE, Cox NJ, Meis JF: Oral terbinafine for treatment of pulmonary Pseudallescheria boydii infection refractory to itraconazole therapy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997;16(1):26–8. 10.1007/BF01575117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201. Husain S, Muñoz P, Forrest G, et al. : Infections due to Scedosporium apiospermum and Scedosporium prolificans in transplant recipients: clinical characteristics and impact of antifungal agent therapy on outcome. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(1):89–99. 10.1086/426445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202. Rogasi PG, Zanazzi M, Nocentini J, et al. : Disseminated Scedosporium apiospermum infection in renal transplant recipient: long-term successful treatment with voriconazole: a case report. Transplant Proc. 2007;39(6):2033–5. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.05.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203. Musk M, Chambers D, Chin W, et al. : Successful treatment of disseminated scedosporium infection in 2 lung transplant recipients: review of the literature and recommendations for management. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25(10):1268–72. 10.1016/j.healun.2006.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204. Nomdedéu J, Brunet S, Martino R, et al. : Successful treatment of pneumonia due to Scedosporium apiospermum with itraconazole: case report. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;16(5):731–3. 10.1093/clind/16.5.731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205. Berenguer J, Rodríguez-Tudela JL, Richard C, et al. : Deep infections caused by Scedosporium prolificans. A report on 16 cases in Spain and a review of the literature. Scedosporium Prolificans Spanish Study Group. Medicine (Baltimore). 1997;76(4):256–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206. Bouza E, Muñoz P, Vega L, et al. : Clinical resolution of Scedosporium prolificans fungemia associated with reversal of neutropenia following administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23(1):192–3. 10.1093/clinids/23.1.192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207. Luangsa-Ard J, Houbraken J, van Doorn T, et al. : Purpureocillium, a new genus for the medically important Paecilomyces lilacinus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2011;321(2):141–9. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02322.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208. Chamilos G, Kontoyiannis DP: Voriconazole-resistant disseminated Paecilomyces variotii infection in a neutropenic patient with leukaemia on voriconazole prophylaxis. J Infect. 2005;51(4):e225–8. 10.1016/j.jinf.2005.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 209. Orth B, Frei R, Itin PH, et al. : Outbreak of invasive mycoses caused by Paecilomyces lilacinus from a contaminated skin lotion. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125(10):799–806. 10.7326/0003-4819-125-10-199611150-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210. Houbraken J, Verweij PE, Rijs AJ, et al. : Identification of Paecilomyces variotii in clinical samples and settings. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(8):2754–61. 10.1128/JCM.00764-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 211. Salle V, Lecuyer E, Chouaki T, et al. : Paecilomyces variotii fungemia in a patient with multiple myeloma: case report and literature review. J Infect. 2005;51(3):e93–5. 10.1016/j.jinf.2004.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212. Wang SM, Shieh CC, Liu CC: Successful treatment of Paecilomyces variotii splenic abscesses: a rare complication in a previously unrecognized chronic granulomatous disease child. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005;53(2):149–52. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.04.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213. Shing MM, Ip M, Li CK, et al. : Paecilomyces varioti fungemia in a bone marrow transplant patient. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996;17(2):281–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214. Pastor FJ, Guarro J: Clinical manifestations, treatment and outcome of Paecilomyces lilacinus infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12(10):948–60. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01481.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215. Barker AP, Horan JL, Slechta ES, et al. : Complexities associated with the molecular and proteomic identification of Paecilomyces species in the clinical mycology laboratory. Med Mycol. 2014;52(5):537–45. 10.1093/mmy/myu001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216. Revankar SG, Sutton DA: Melanized fungi in human disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(4):884–928. 10.1128/CMR.00019-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 217. Jacobson ES: Pathogenic roles for fungal melanins. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13(4):708–17. 10.1128/CMR.13.4.708-717.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218. Hamilton AJ, Gomez BL: Melanins in fungal pathogens. J Med Microbiol. 2002;51(3):189–91. 10.1099/0022-1317-51-3-189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219. Wong EH, Revankar SG: Dematiaceous Molds. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2016;30(1):165–78. 10.1016/j.idc.2015.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220. Chowdhary A, Meis JF, Guarro J, et al. : ESCMID and ECMM joint clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of systemic phaeohyphomycosis: diseases caused by black fungi. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(Suppl 3):47–75. 10.1111/1469-0691.12515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221. Abbas KM, Dorratoltaj N, O'Dell ML, et al. : Clinical Response, Outbreak Investigation, and Epidemiology of the Fungal Meningitis Epidemic in the United States: Systematic Review. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10(1):145–51. 10.1017/dmp.2015.137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222. Kenyon C, Bonorchis K, Corcoran C, et al. : A dimorphic fungus causing disseminated infection in South Africa. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(15):1416–24. 10.1056/NEJMoa1215460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 223. Schwartz IS, Kenyon C, Feng P, et al. : 50 Years of Emmonsia Disease in Humans: The Dramatic Emergence of a Cluster of Novel Fungal Pathogens. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(11):e1005198. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 224. Yang Y, Ye Q, Li K, et al. : Genomics and Comparative Genomic Analyses Provide Insight into the Taxonomy and Pathogenic Potential of Novel Emmonsia Pathogens. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:105. 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 225. Gori S, Drouhet E, Guého E, et al. : Cutaneous disseminated mycosis in a patient with AIDS due to a new dimorphic fungus. J Mycol Med. 1998;8:57–63. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 226. Drouhet E, Guého E, Gori S, et al. : Mycological, ultrastructural and experimental aspects of a new dimorphic fungus Emmonsia pasteuriana sp. nov. isolated from a cutaneous disseminated mycosis in AIDS. J Mycol Med. 1998;8:64–77. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 227. Pelegrín I, Ayats J, Xiol X, et al. : Disseminated adiaspiromycosis: case report of a liver transplant patient with human immunodeficiency infection, and literature review. Transpl Infect Dis. 2011;13(5):507–14. 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2011.00611.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228. Dukik K, Muñoz JF, Jiang Y, et al. : Novel taxa of thermally dimorphic systemic pathogens in the Ajellomycetaceae ( Onygenales). Mycoses. 2017;60(5):296–309. 10.1111/myc.12601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229. Schwartz IS, Govender NP, Corcoran C, et al. : Clinical Characteristics, Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes of Disseminated Emmonsiosis: A Retrospective Case Series. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(6):1004–12. 10.1093/cid/civ439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230. Samson RA, Yilmaz N, Houbraken J, et al. : Phylogeny and nomenclature of the genus Talaromyces and taxa accommodated in Penicillium subgenus Biverticillium. Stud Mycol. 2011;70(1):159–83. 10.3114/sim.2011.70.04 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231. Vanittanakom N, Cooper CR, Jr, Fisher MC, et al. : Penicillium marneffei infection and recent advances in the epidemiology and molecular biology aspects. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19(1):95–110. 10.1128/CMR.19.1.95-110.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232. Supparatpinyo K, Khamwan C, Baosoung V, et al. : Disseminated Penicillium marneffei infection in southeast Asia. Lancet. 1994;344(8915):110–3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91287-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233. Ustianowski AP, Sieu TP, Day JN: Penicillium marneffei infection in HIV. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008;21(1):31–6. 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3282f406ae [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234. Chan JF, Lau SK, Yuen KY, et al. : Talaromyces (Penicillium) marneffei infection in non-HIV-infected patients. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2016;5(3):e19. 10.1038/emi.2016.18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 235. Chan JF, Chan TS, Gill H, et al. : Disseminated Infections with Talaromyces marneffei in Non-AIDS Patients Given Monoclonal Antibodies against CD20 and Kinase Inhibitors. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(7):1101–6. 10.3201/eid2107.150138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236. Tse E, Leung RY, Kwong Y: Invasive fungal infections after obinutuzumab monotherapy for refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Ann Hematol. 2015;94(1):165–7. 10.1007/s00277-014-2120-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237. Tang BS, Chan JF, Chen M, et al. : Disseminated penicilliosis, recurrent bacteremic nontyphoidal salmonellosis, and burkholderiosis associated with acquired immunodeficiency due to autoantibody against gamma interferon. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010;17(7):1132–8. 10.1128/CVI.00053-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238. Hermans F, Ombelet S, Degezelle K, et al. : First-in-man observation of Talaromyces marneffei-transmission by organ transplantation. Mycoses. 2017;60(3):213–7. 10.1111/myc.12574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 239. Mohsin J, Khalili SA, van den Ende AHGG, et al. : Imported Talaromycosis in Oman in Advanced HIV: A Diagnostic Challenge Outside the Endemic Areas. Mycopathologia. 2017;182(7–8):739–45. 10.1007/s11046-017-0124-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240. Hu Y, Zhang J, Li X, et al. : Penicillium marneffei infection: an emerging disease in mainland China. Mycopathologia. 2013;175(1–2):57–67. 10.1007/s11046-012-9577-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241. Supparatpinyo K, Sirisanthana T: Disseminated Penicillium marneffei infection diagnosed on examination of a peripheral blood smear of a patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18(2):246–7. 10.1093/clinids/18.2.246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242. Hien HT, Thanh TT, Thu NT, et al. : Development and evaluation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for the rapid detection of Talaromyces marneffei MP1 gene in human plasma. Mycoses. 2016;59(12):773–780. 10.1111/myc.12530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 243. Lau SK, Lam CS, Ngan AH, et al. : Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for rapid identification of mold and yeast cultures of Penicillium marneffei. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16:36. 10.1186/s12866-016-0656-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 244. Sirisanthana T, Supparatpinyo K, Perriens J, et al. : Amphotericin B and itraconazole for treatment of disseminated Penicillium marneffei infection in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26(5):1107–10. 10.1086/520280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245. Supparatpinyo K, Schlamm HT: Voriconazole as therapy for systemic Penicillium marneffei infections in AIDS patients. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77(2):350–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]