Abstract
Columbin (1) is a furanolactone diterpene isolated from the roots of Jateorhiza and Tinospora species. These species generally grow in Asia and Africa and have been used in folk medicine for their apparent analgesic and antipyretic activities. Columbin (1) is of particular interest due to its structural similarity to the known kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonist salvinorin A. Given that the KOR is of interest in the study of many serious diseases, such as anxiety, depression, and drug addiction, obtaining natural or semisynthetic molecules with KOR activity recently has gained much interest. For this reason, in the present study, derivatives of 1 were designed and synthesized using known structure-activity relationships of salvinorin A at KORs. The structures of the columbin analogues prepared were elucidated by NMR spectroscopy and mass spectroscopy and their KOR activity was investigated in vitro by inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation. Slight improvements in KOR activity were observed in columbin derivatives over their parent compound. However, despite the structural similarities to salvinorin A, neither columbin (1) nor its derivatives were potent KOR ligands. This work represents not only the first evaluation of columbin (1) at the KOR but also one of the first works to explore synthetic strategies that are tolerated on the columbin core.
Graphical Abstract

Columbin (1) is a cytotoxic cis-clerodane diterpene isolated from the roots of Jateorhiza columba, Tinospora capillipes, and Tinospora sagittata.1–3 The genera Tinospora and Jateorhiza belong to the Menispermaceae family and are found most widely in Asia and Africa. Characteristic components of these genera are neoclerodane diterpenoids,4,5 representative of an important chemical class with a variety of demonstrated biological activities including cytotoxic, analgesic, and antimicrobial activities.6–9 The roots of J. columba, T. capillipes, and T. sagittata containing columbin (1) have been used in folk medicine as analgesic and antipyretic agents.2 Tinospora sagittata, which is in the Pharmacopeia of the People’s Republic of China, demonstrates anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antibacterial, antiulcer, antitumor, and antistress effects,10–13 and its roots have been used in traditional medicine to ease sore throats, stop diarrhea, and treat upper respiratory tract infections.14 Pharmacological studies have shown that ethanol extracts of the roots of T. sagittata and T. capillipes have antibiotic, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral activities.15 Columbin (1) itself has been demonstrated to possess cytotoxic and anti-inflammatory activities.2, 16
Salvinorin A, a trans-neoclerodane diterpene, is the main component of Salvia divinorum and is a highly selective κ-opioid receptor (KOR) agonist. KORs are important targets for several diseases such as anxiety, depression, and drug addiction.17 Although much work has been done to develop KOR ligands for the treatment of these disease targets, few compounds have progressed to human clinical trials to date.18 Through these studies, several structure-activity relationships (SAR) of salvinorin A at the KORs have been elucidated.19–24
Structural comparisons of columbin (1) and salvinorin A reveal high similarity between the B and C rings, with differences in the conformations of the C-10 proton, the C-19 methyl, and the C-12 furan ring (Figure 1). The largest structural distinctions can be seen by comparing the A rings. While salvinorin A has a carbonyl at C-1, an acetate at C-2 and a carbomethoxy group at C-4, columbin (1) has a lactone ring between C-1 and C-4, resulting in a more strained A ring. Compound 1 also has a hydroxy group at the quaternary C-4 and a double bond between C-2 and C-3 on ring A, unlike salvinorin A.
Figure 1.
Structures of compounds 1–9 and salvinorin A
Although there are some isolation and bioactivity studies on columbin (1) in the literature, few synthetic studies on columbin (1) has been published to date.25,26 The high structural similarity of these two diterpenoid furanolactones, columbin (1) and salvinorin A, led us to investigate if 1 possesses the same KOR activity as salvinorin A. Additionally, it was sought to determine if SAR known to affect the KOR activity of salvinorin A could be applied to the structurally similar 1. Therefore, in the present study, several derivatives of columbin (1) were synthesized and evaluated for KOR activity.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Synthesis of Columbin (1) Analogues
Considering the functional groups of columbin (1) and their similarity to those of salvinorin A as well as known transformations and SAR of salvinorin A, several analogues of 1 were generated (Figure 1). The C-2 acetoxy group of salvinorin A plays a significant role in the activity at KORs.22 While salvinorin A is very potent at KORs, cleavage of the C-2 acetate to form salvinorin B significantly reduces potency.27 As this ester cleavage is rapid in vivo, many modifications on C-2 of salvinorin A have been done to date to both improve activity and metabolic stability.28–31 While the replacement of the C-2 acetoxy group with an ethoxymethyl ether gave a more potent neoclerodane at KORs,30 replacement of the C-2 acetoxy group with a benzoate group yielded herkinorin, a very potent diterpenoid at μ opioid receptors.29 For this purpose, the double bond of 1 was dihydroxylated and the hydroxy groups at C-2 and C-3 were acetylated in order to obtain a clerodane with an acetoxy group at C-2 similar to salvinorin A. The role of the 4-position carbomethoxy group of salvinorin A has also been investigated, and it has been demonstrated that reduction of this carbomethoxy group to the primary alcohol reduces affinity for KORs.32,33 Columbin (1) has a hydroxy group at C-4 that could be utilized to introduce ester and alkoxy functionalities to determine if these changes on the molecule would affect KOR activity. Compound 1 is unsaturated between C-2 and C-3, unlike salvinorin A, so reduction of this double bond was envisioned to make a molecule more like salvinorin A. Bromination of the furan ring of salvinorin A results in a KOR agonist that successfully attenuates the drug-induced reinstatement of cocaine in an animal model of drug abuse without causing sedation.23 Thus, brominated analogues of columbin (1) were synthesized to see if a similar trend in SAR was observed.
Columbin (1) in dichloromethane was treated with acetic anhydride (Ac2O) in the presence of 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) at room temparature for three days to give 4-acetoxycolumbin (2) in good yield (73%) (Scheme 1). Columbin (1) in dichloromethane was reacted with diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) and chloromethyl methyl ether (MOM-Cl) in the presence of DMAP at room temparature for two days to give 4-methoxymethylcolumbin (3) in good yield (73%). To cinnamic acid, N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), and DMAP in dichloromethane, was added columbin (1), and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temparature for six days. This reaction yielded columbin-4-cinnamate (4) (yield 16%) (Scheme 1). While the alkylation of the C-4 hydroxy group with small acyclic reagents, such as Ac2O and MOM-Cl proceeded easily, the alkylation with large and cyclic alkyl groups, such as 1,1′-thiocarbonyldiimidazole (Im2CS) and cinnamic acid, either gave a low yield or did not form any product. It can be deduced that steric hindrance on ring A of columbin (1) is responsible for this low yield and unsuccessful alkylation reactions.
Scheme 1. Modifications on Hydroxy Group of Columbin (1) a.
aReagents and conditions: (a) Ac2O, DMAP, CH2Cl2, rt 3d; (b) DIPEA, DMAP, MOM-Cl, CH2Cl2, rt, 2d; (c) Cinnamic acid, EDC, DMAP, CH2Cl2, rt, 6d.
Columbin (1) in methanol was stirred under hydrogen in the presence of 10% Pd/C at room temparature for six hours. Hydrogenation of the double bond of 1 was straightforward and yielded 2,3-dihydrocolumbin (5) (yield 77%) (Scheme 2). Columbin (1) in acetone (degassed) was treated with 4% solution of osmium tetroxide (OsO4) in water and a 1 M solution of 4-methylmorpholine N-oxide (NMO) in deionized water. This dihydroxylation reaction also succeeded and gave 2α,3α-dihydroxycolumbin (6) in 47% yield. Stereochemistry of the hydroxy groups were determined using NMR coupling constants, with the 3JH1,H2 of 1.1 Hz indicating an trans-correlation and 3JH2,H3 of 8.3 Hz indicating a syn-interaction, both of which designate the stereochemistry of the hydroxy groups at C-2 and C-3 in the alpha position.
Scheme 2. Modifications on Double Bond of Columbin (1) a.
aReagents and conditions: (a) 10% Pd/C, H2(g), MeOH, rt, 6h; (b) OsO4, NMO, acetone, rt, 24h; (c) NEt3, DMAP, acetyl chloride, CH2Cl2, rt, 1d; (d) NBS, Br2, CH2Cl2, rt, 45 min.
Treatment of 6 in dichloromethane with triethylamine (TEA) and acetyl chloride in the presence of DMAP at room temperature overnight yielded 2α,3α-diacetoxycolumbin (7) (46% yield) (Scheme 2). Derivative 6 is trihydroxylated and a possible result of the acetylation reaction is a triacetylated analogue, but only two hydroxy groups were acetylated under these conditions. The hydroxy group bound to a quaternary carbon atom was not acetylated, presumably due to steric hindrance. If this hydroxy group had been acetylated, two downfield signals at 5.55 ppm (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz) and 5.14 ppm (1H, dd, J = 8.3, 1.3 Hz) would not be observed. The COSY correlation via three bonds of the signals at 5.55 ppm and 5.14 ppm also showed that the hydroxy groups bonded to C-2 and C-3 were acetylated.
Columbin (1) in dichloromethane was treated with N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) in the presence of bromine at room temparature for 45 min. Bromination of 1 gave two products, 16-bromocolumbin (8) (yield, 45%) and 2α,3β,16-tribromocolumbin (9) (yield, 29%) (Scheme 2). Similar to determining the stereochemistry of the hydroxy groups in 6, the stereochemistry of bromo groups were determined using NMR coupling constants. According to the 1H NMR spectrum of compound 9, 3JH1,H2 and 3JH2,H3 are 0 Hz and 3.9 Hz, respectively, indicating that the stereochemistry of H-2 and H-3 should be beta and alpha, respectively. The bromination of furan rings of similar natural compounds such as salvinorin A gave a range of yields in the previous reactions.27,34 Bromination of columbin (1) gave two products, which differed from a similar reaction with salvinorin A, as columbin (1) has a double bond on ring A in addition to furan ring.
Some reactions attempted on columbin (1) did not succeed (Scheme S1, Supporting Information). Natural product semisynthesis requires the operation of selective chemical transformations in the presence of a complex chemical functionality provided by Nature, and it is often challenging to predict the success of a reaction without prior experimental work. Columbin (1) in dichloromethane was treated with meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (mCPBA) in varying amounts in the presence of sodium bicarbonate for differing reaction times at room temperature. However, epoxidation of the A ring could not be accomplished and the starting material decomposed each time. The A ring of columbin (1) is already strained because of the bicyclic lactone system, and thus the introduction of an epoxide to carbons 2 and 3 would make the product more strained. This added strain and inherent instability were likely why the reactions were unsuccessful.
Columbin (1) in dichloromethane was treated with Im2CS in the presence of DMAP at room temperature overnight, but the starting material did not react and the coupling reaction failed. The introduction of Im2CS to the hydroxy group failed presumably because ring A of columbin (1) is sterically hindered. Most of the previous alkylation reactions of the hydroxy group of columbin (1) with large alkyl groups also failed because of this steric hindrance. Columbin (1) in THF was treated with sodium hydride (NaH, 60% dispersion in mineral oil) at 0 °C and allyl bromide at room temperature, respectively. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for two days but the starting material remained and the reaction failed.
In the literature, there are several publications related to the synthesis and biological evaluation of C-12 derivatives of salvinorin A. The furan ring bound to C-12 was converted by ruthenium-catalyzed oxidation to a carboxylic acid, and then heterocycles were introduced. In this way, various C-12 derivatives of salvinorin A were obtained.35,36 The same approach was attempted on columbin (1). Columbin (1) in solvent mixture (CCl4/CH3CN/H2O) was treated with sodium periodate (NaIO4), in the presence of ruthenium (III) chloride hydrate (RuCl3) catalyst at room temparature for 3.5 h. The reaction went to completion, but the product decomposed during acid-base work-up each time. This decomposition is presumably due to the fact that columbin (1) has two lactone rings that more than likely did not tolerate the acid work-up. Previous reports have suggested ozonolysis to be more effective.25
KOR Activity of Columbin (1) Analogues
Currently, there is not any published work related to the KOR activity of columbin (1) or any studies of its analogues. To begin the present study, columbin (1) was evaluated initially for KOR activity using an in vitro functional assay to assess the inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation in CHO cells stably expressing the hKOR, as described previously.23 Columbin (1) displayed no activity in this assay at the highest dose tested, 50 μM. As indicated above, columbin (1) and salvinorin A are very structurally similar (Figure 1), thus columbin’s lack of activity at KOR was somewhat surprising as salvinorin A is a full KOR agonist with a potency of 0.042 ± 0.005 nM. Therefore, we sought to determine if the SAR known from previous salvinorin A studies could be applied to the columbin (1) scaffold to identify an active KOR analogue from an inactive parent compound. Through this strategy, columbin analogues with KOR activity were identified (Table 1). Compounds with substitutions to the A-ring seemed to be the most promising compounds, with the analogues 2,3-dihydrocolumbin (5), columbin-4-cinnamate (4), 4-acetoxycolumbin (2), 4-methoxymethylcolumbin (3), and 2α,3α-dihydroxycolumbin (6) showing at least 25-, 8.3-, 6.3-, 4.2-, and 3.1-fold higher KOR activity than columbin (1), respectively. This result is not surprising, as the biggest structural differences between columbin (1) and salvinorin A are in the A ring, and attempts to make it more salvinorin A-like via A-ring modifications were successful in achieiving KOR activity. However, 2α,3α-diacetoxycolumbin (7) had the most similar substitution pattern to the A ring of salvinorin A, yet it was the only A-ring substituted analogue synthesized that did not demonstrate KOR activity. Additionally, substitution to the furan ring of columbin (1) did not appear to be tolerated at the KOR, with 16-bromocolumbin (8) and 2α,3β,16-tribromocolumbin (9) having no activity at 50 μM. Although the most potent analogue (5) did not approach the potency of salvinorin A, with a potency value of 2.0 ± 0.8 μM, the increased activity from its parent columbin (1) is a promising result, suggesting that this strategy may lead to the development of other clerodane-based KOR agonists.
Table 1.
In vitro KOR Activity Results of Columbin Analoguesa
| compound name | potency EC50 ± SEM b,c (μM) |
fold increase over columbin (1) |
|---|---|---|
| columbin (1) | >50 d | NAe |
| 4-acetoxycolumbin (2) | 8.0 ± 2.0 | ≥6.3 |
| 4-methoxymethylcolumbin (3) | 12.0 ± 4.0 | ≥4.2 |
| columbin-4-cinnamate (4) | 6.0 ± 4.0 | ≥8.3 |
| 2,3-dihydrocolumbin (5) | 2.0 ± 0.8 | ≥25.0 |
| 2α,3α-dihydroxycolumbin (6) | 16.0 ± 6.0 | ≥3.1 |
| 2α,3α-diacetoxycolumbin (7) | >50 d | NAe |
| 16-bromocolumbin (8) | >50 d | NAe |
| 2α,3β,16-tribromocolumbin (9) | >50 d | NAe |
Evaluation of forskolin induced cAMP accumulation. In this assay salvinorin A has an EC50 value of 0.042 ± 0.005 nM and an Emax = 100%.
Means ± standard error of the mean; n ≥ 2 individual experiments run in triplicate.
KOR Emax = 100% unless otherwise noted.
KOR Emax = 0% up to 50μM.
Not applicable.
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
General Experimental Methods
Columbin (1) was purchased from BOC Sciences (Shirley, NY, USA). All other chemical reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. All solvents were obtained from a solvent purification system in which solvent was passed through two columns of activated alumina under argon. Reactions performed in standard glassware were performed under an atmosphere of argon using glassware dried overnight in an oven at 120 °C and cooled under a stream of argon. Reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on 0.25 mm Analtech GHLF silica gel plates and visualized using a UV Lamp (254 nm) and vanillin solution. Flash column chromatography was performed on silica gel (4–63 mm) from Sorbent Technologies. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded a 500 MHz Bruker AVIII NMR spectrometer equipped with a cryogenically-cooled carbon observe probe or 400 MHz Bruker AVIIIHD NMR spectrometer with a broadband X-channel detect gradient probe using tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm and coupling constants (J) are reported in Hz. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained on a LCT Premier (Micromass Ltd., Manchester UK) time of flight mass spectrometer with an electrospray ion source in either the positive or negative mode. Melting points were measured with a Thomas Capillary Melting Point Apparatus and are uncorrected. HPLC was carried out on an Agilent 1100 series HPLC system with diode array detection at 209 nm on an Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18 column (250 × 10 mm, 5 mm). Compounds were identified as ≥95% pure by HPLC before all in vitro and in vivo analyses unless otherwise noted. UPLC/HRMS analyses were carried on a Waters Acquity UPLC with a photodiode array UV detector and an LCT Premiere TOF mass spectrometer. Purification was carried out by Mass Directed Fractionation on an Agilent 1200 instrument with photodiode array detector, an Agilent 6120 quadrupole mass spectrometer, and a HTPAL LEAP autosampler. The data from UPLC/HRMS analyses were used to choose narrow preparative gradients and triggering thresholds for both MS and UV signals.
Synthesis and Characterization
4-Acetoxycolumbin (2)
To a 5 mL round-bottomed dry flask purged with argon was added columbin (1) (36 mg, 0.1 mmol, 1 equiv.), dry dichloromethane (1 mL), DMAP (catalytic amount), and Ac2O (15.3 mg, 0.15 mmol, 1.5 equiv.), respectively. The reaction mixture was left to stir at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was monitored by TLC after 1 day and there still was some starting material in the reaction mixture, so extra Ac2O (30.6 mg, 0.3 mmol, 3 equiv.) was added and the resulting mixture was left to stir at room temperature for 2 days more. The reaction mixture was diluted with 25 mL of dichloromethane, washed with 1 N hydrochloric acid (HCl) (3 × 10 mL), water (10 mL), saturated aqueous solution of sodium bicarbonate (10 mL), and brine (20 mL), respectively. Then, it was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified via column chromatography (0–15% ethyl acetate/dichloromethane) to yield a product as a white crystalline solid (29.4 mg, 0.073 mmol, 73% yield). The purity of the product was determined according to purity method 1 given below (retention time: 2.64 min, purity: 97.4%): mp 176–181 °C (dec); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3)= δ 7.48 (1H, m), 7.44 (1H, t, J = 1.7 Hz), 6.55 (1H, dd, J = 8.1, 1.8 Hz), 6.45 (1H, m), 6.44 (1H, m), 5.41 (1H, dd, J = 11.9, 4.3 Hz), 5.14 (1H, m), 2.70 (1H, m), 2.42 (1H, dd, J = 11.2, 2.1 Hz), 2.29 (1H, dd, J = 14.9, 4.4 Hz), 2.24 (3H, s), 2.09 (1H, m), 1.96 (1H, dd, J = 14.9, 11.9 Hz), 1.85 (1H, dd, J = 14.5, 7.7 Hz), 1.62 (1H, m), 1.60 (1H, brs), 1.26 (3H, s), 1.08 (3H, s); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3)= δ 173.4, 169.5, 168.7, 143.9, 139.6, 134.3, 126.5, 124.6, 108.3, 84.3, 73.3, 70.7, 46.6, 44.5, 41.7, 37.2, 35.1, 28.1, 25.7, 24.5, 21.1, 17.1; HRESIMS m/z 423.1398 [M + Na]+, calcd for C22H24O7Na, 423.1420.
4-Methoxymethylcolumbin (3)
To a 5 mL round-bottomed dry flask purged with argon was added columbin (1) (36 mg, 0.1 mmol, 1 equiv.), dry dichloromethane (1 mL), DMAP (catalytic amount), and DIPEA (130 mg, 180 μL, 1 mmol, 10 equiv.), respectively, and then MOM-Cl (94.54 mg, 100 μL, 1 mmol, 10 equiv.) was added dropwise at room temperature. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction was monitored by TLC and the starting material was not completely consumed, so 5 equivalents more of DIPEA and MOM-Cl were added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with 25 mL of dichloromethane, washed with 1 N HCl (3 × 10 mL), water (10 mL), saturated aqueous solution of sodium bicarbonate (10 mL), and brine (20 mL), respectively. Then, it was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified via column chromatography (5–20% ethyl acetate/dichloromethane) to yield a product as a white crystalline solid (29.3 mg 0.073 mmol, 73% yield). The purity of the product was determined according to the purity method 1 given below (retention time: 3.07 min, purity: 98%): mp 163–167 °C (dec); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)= δ 7.48 (1H, m), 7.44 (1H, t, J = 1.6 Hz), 6.83 (1H, dd, J = 8.2, 1.6 Hz), 6.53 (1H, dd, J = 8.2, 5.1 Hz), 6.44 (1H, m), 5.41 (1H, dd, J = 11.9, 4.3 Hz), 5.11 (1H, brd, J = 7.7 Hz), 5.07 (1H, d, J = 5.2 Hz), 4.94 (1H, brd, J = 7.7 Hz), 3.48 (3H, s), 2.64 (1H, m), 2.41 (1H, dd, J = 11.1, 2.1 Hz), 2.26 (1H, dd, J = 14.9, 4.4 Hz), 2.08 (1H, m), 1.92 (2H, m), 1.69 (1H, brs), 1.55 (1H, m), 1.26 (3H, s), 1.07 (3H, s); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3)= δ 173.5, 172.7, 143.9, 139.6, 134.1, 130.1, 124.7, 108.4, 95.3, 86.8, 72.9, 70.9, 55.9, 47.5, 44.4, 41.8, 37.9, 35.2, 28.3, 26.1, 24.5, 17.4; HRESIMS m/z 425.1611 [M+Na]+, calcd for C22H26O7Na, 425.1576.
Columbin-4-cinnamate (4)
To a 10 mL-dry flask purged with argon was added cinnamic acid (30 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1.4 equiv.), EDC (38 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1.4 equiv.), DMAP (catalytic amount), and dry dichloromethane (4 mL) at 0 °C, and then columbin (1) (50 mg, 0.14 mmol, 1 equiv.) was added at 0 °C. The resulting mixture was brought to ambient temperature and left to stir at room temperature overnight. TLC indicated that the starting material was not completely consumed, so cinnamic acid (3 equiv.) and EDC (3 equiv.) were added at 0 °C and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 days more. The reaction did not go to completion. The reaction mixture was purified via column chromatography (5–25% ethyl acetate/dichloromethane) to yield product as a white solid (11.2 mg, 0.023 mmol, 16% yield). Further purification was carried out by the preparative-HPLC method given below. The purity of the product was determined according to purity method 2 given below (retention time: 2.27 min, purity: 96% purity): mp 218–220 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)= δ 7.79 (1H, brd, J = 15.9 Hz), 7.57 (2H, m), 7.50 (1H, d, J = 1.3 Hz), 7.45 (1H, t, J = 1.7 Hz), 7.42 (2H, m), 7.41 (1H, m), 6.64 (1H, dd, J = 8.1; 1.8 Hz), 6.57 (1H, d, J = 15.9 Hz), 6.49 (1H, dd, J = 8.1, 5.2 Hz), 6.45 (1H, m), 5.43 (1H, dd, J = 12.0, 4.3 Hz), 5.17 (1H, dd, J = 5.2; 1.8 Hz), 2.75 (1H, m), 2.45 (1H, dd, J = 11.2; 2.0 Hz), 2.31 (1H, dd, J = 14.8, 4.4 Hz), 2.13 (1H, m), 1.97 (2H, m), 1.74 (1H, brs), 1.69 (1H, m), 1.29 (3H, s), 1.16 (3H, s); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3)= δ 173.4, 168.7, 165.2, 146.6, 143.9, 139.6, 134.5, 134.0, 130.7, 128.9 × 2, 128.3 × 2, 126.5, 124.6, 117.0, 108.3, 84.4, 73.3, 70.7, 46.7, 44.5, 41.8, 37.5, 35.1, 28.2, 26.0, 24.7, 17.1; HRESIMS m/z 530.2156 [M+ACN+H]+, calcd for C29H28O7C2H3NH, 530.2173.
2,3-Dihydrocolumbin (5)
To a 10 mL round-bottomed dry flask purged with argon was added columbin (1) (72 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv.), 10% Pd/C (catalytic amount), and methanol (5 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature under argon for 5 min. The flask was then fully purged with H2 and was stirred rapidly at room temperature for 6 h. The mixture was subsequently passed through a plug of Celite, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, decanted, and concentrated. The residue was purified via column chromatography (15% ethyl acetate/dichloromethane) to yield a product as a white crystalline solid (55.3 mg, 0.15 mmol, 77% yield). The purity of this product was determined according to the purity method 2 given below (retention time: 1.50 min, 100% purity): mp 215–219 °C (dec); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3)= δ 7.47 (1H, m), 7.44 (1H, t, J = 1.7 Hz), 6.43 (1H, dd, J = 1.9, 0.9 Hz), 5.41 (1H, dd, J = 11.9, 4.4 Hz), 4.68 (1H, brd, J = 4.0 Hz), 2.69 (1H, m), 2.47 (1H, m), 2.37 (1H, dd, J = 11.2, 2.2 Hz), 2.24 (1H, m), 2.17 (1H, m), 2.05 (1H, m,), 1.89 (1H, dd, J = 14.8, 12.0 Hz), 1.84 (1H, m), 1.84 (1H, brs), 1.70 (1H, m), 1.66 (1H, m), 1.44 (1H, m), 1.26 (3H, s), 1.24 (3H, s); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3)= δ 177.8, 173.4, 143.9, 139.5, 124.7, 108.3, 75.3, 75.2, 70.7, 47.8, 44.1, 41.6, 39.6, 34.4, 27.7, 27.0, 25.5, 25.2, 22.0, 16.6; HRESIMS m/z 402.1849 [M+ACN+H]+, calcd for C20H24O6C2H3NH, 402.1911.
2α,3α-Dihydroxycolumbin (6)
To a 5 mL round-bottomed dry flask purged with argon was added columbin (1) (36 mg, 0.1 mmol, 1 equiv.) and acetone (degassed) (1 mL), and stirred under argon at 0 °C. A 4% solution of OsO4 in water (36 μL) and a 1 M solution of NMO in deionized water (158 μL) were added. After the mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight, a saturated aqueous solution of sodium sulfite (2 mL) was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL × 4), the pooled organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified via column chromatography (50–100% ethyl acetate/dichloromethane) to yield a product as a white powder (18.6 mg, 0.047 mmol, 47% yield). The purity of the product was determined according to the purity method 1 given below (retention time: 1.45 min, 95% purity): mp 231–235 °C (dec); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3COCD3)= δ 7.47 (1H, m), 7.43 (1H, t, J = 1.7 Hz), 6.47 (1H, dd, J = 1.9, 0.9 Hz), 5.59 (1H, dd, J = 12.3, 4.1 Hz), 4.54 (1H, brs), 4.25 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 4.10 (1H, dd, J = 8.3, 1.1 Hz), 2.49 (1H, m), 2.41 (1H, dd, J = 11.3, 2.0 Hz), 2.34 (1H, dd, J = 14.8, 4.2 Hz), 1.89 (1H, brs), 1.87 (1H, m), 1.84 (1H, m), 1.50 (1H, dd, J = 14.5, 8.6 Hz), 1.34 (1H, m), 1.10 (3H, s), 1.00 (3H, s); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3COCD3)= δ 173.6, 173.1, 143.6, 139.9, 126.0, 108.8, 80.1, 79.5, 70.6, 67.9, 67.4, 43.7, 42.8, 41.0, 37.8, 34.3, 26.7, 26.0, 21.8, 16.1; HRESIMS m/z 415.1110 [M + Na]+, calcd for C20H24O8Na, 415.1369.
2α,3α-Diacetoxycolumbin (7)
To a 5 mL round-bottomed dry flask purged with argon was added 2α,3α-dihydroxycolumbin (6) (20 mg, 0.05 mmol, 1 equiv.), dry dichloromethane (1 mL), DMAP (catalytic amount), and TEA (76 mg, 100 μL, 0.75 mmol, 15 equiv.), respectively, and then acetyl chloride (59 mg, 54 μL, 0.75 mmol, 15 equiv.) was added dropwise at 0 °C. The resulting mixture was brought to ambient temperature and left to stir at room temperature overnight. The reaction was quenched with 1 mL of water and diluted with chloroform. The organic phase was separated, washed with saturated aqueous solution of ammonium chloride (20 mL × 3), water and brine, respectively. Then, it was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified via column chromatography (25% ethyl acetate/dichloromethane) to yield a product as a white powder (11 mg, 0.023 mmol, 46% yield). Further purification was carried out by the preparative-HPLC method given below. The purity of the product was determined according to the purity method 2 given below (retention time: 1.67 min, purity: 100%): mp 137–139 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)= δ 7.48 (1H, m), 7.44 (1H, t, J = 1.8 Hz), 6.43 (1H, brd, J = 1.8 Hz), 5.55 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 5.45 (1H, dd, J = 11.6, 4.5 Hz), 5.14 (1H, dd, J = 8.3, 1.3 Hz,), 4.68 (1H, brs), 3.31 (1H, s, -OH proton), 2.68 (1H, m), 2.42 (1H, dd, J = 11.2, 2.2 Hz), 2.19 (1H, dd, J = 14.9, 4.6 Hz), 2.11 (3H, s), 2.09 (3H, s), 2.03 (1H, m), 1.92 (1H, dd, J = 14.9, 11.6 Hz), 1.85 (1H, brs), 1.75 (1H, dd, J = 14.6, 8.2 Hz), 1.46 (1H, m), 1.27 (3H, s), 1.26 (3H, s); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3)= δ 173.09, 173.05, 169.77, 169.75, 143.9, 139.7, 124.5, 108.3, 77.4, 76.6, 70.6, 68.5, 68.4, 44.4, 43.8, 41.5, 38.0, 34.4, 27.7, 25.5, 22.9, 20.5, 20.3, 16.2; HRESIMS m/z 518.1956 [M+ACN+H]+, calcd for C24H28O10C2H3NH, 518.2020.
16-Bromocolumbin (8) and 2α,3β,16-tribromocolumbin (9)
To a 25 mL round-bottomed dry flask purged with argon was added columbin (1) (72 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv.), NBS (50 mg, 0.28 mmol, 1.4 equiv.), dry dichloromethane (10 mL), and bromine (2 drops). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 45 min. The reaction mixture was purified via column chromatography (0–25% ethyl acetate/dichloromethane) to yield products as white powder (38.7 mg, 0.09 mmol, 45% yield and 34.4 mg, 0.06 mmol, 29% yield, respectively). Further purification was carried out by the preparative-HPLC method given below. The purities of the products were determined according to the purity method 2 given below (retention time: 1.73 min, purity: 100% and retention time: 2.12 min, purity: 100%, respectively).
16-Bromocolumbin (8)
mp 110–112 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)= δ 7.47 (1H, d, 2.1 Hz), 6.48 (1H, m), 6.47 (1H, m), 6.39 (1H, dd, J = 7.9, 1.8 Hz), 5.30 (1H, dd, J = 12.4, 4.4 Hz), 5.17 (1H, d, J = 5.2 Hz), 3.47 (1H, s, -OH proton), 2.60 (1H, m), 2.44 (1H, dd, J = 11.1, 2.4 Hz), 2.14 (1H, dd, J = 15.1, 4.4 Hz), 2.09 (1H, m), 1.90 (1H, dd, 15.0, 12.4 Hz), 1.77 (1H, brs), 1.77 (1H, m), 1.46 (1H, m), 1.25 (3H, s), 1.09 (3H, s,); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3)= δ 175.5, 173.3, 144.9, 136.8, 128.7, 122.7, 120.6, 110.6, 80.3, 74.1, 70.6, 47.2, 44.5, 41.4, 37.1, 35.2, 28.2, 25.6, 24.5, 17.4; HRESIMS m/z 481.0492 [M+HCOO]−, calcd for C20H21BrO6HCOO, 481.0504.
2α,3β,16-Tribromocolumbin (9)
mp 154–155 °C (dec); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)= δ 7.47 (1H, d, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.48 (1H, d, J = 2.1 Hz), 5.54 (1H, dd, J = 12.5, 4.1 Hz), 4.77 (2H, m), 4.59 (1H, brd, J = 3.9 Hz), 3.49 (1H, s, -OH proton), 2.75 (1H, m), 2.45 (1H, dd, J = 11.3, 1.7 Hz), 2.08 (2H, m), 1.83 (2H, m), 1.55 (1H, m), 1.46 (1H, m), 1.29 (3H, s), 1.25 (3H, s); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3)= δ 172.9, 171.5, 145.0, 122.6, 120.9, 110.5, 78.0, 77.8, 70.8, 54.0, 50.5, 43.8, 41.1, 40.6, 40.3, 34.0, 27.2, 26.3, 21.4, 16.6; HRESIMS m/z 592.8829 [M-H] −, calcd for C20H20Br3O6, 592.8815.
Purity Method 1
For this procedure, HPLC analysis was used involving gradient elution of 60% CH3CN to 40% H2O over 8 min on an Agilent C18 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm column with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The crude samples were dissolved in CH3CN (concentration: 1 mg/mL, sample size: 10 μL (pump: Agilent 1100 Series Quaternary).
Purity Method 2
For this procedure, UPLC/HRMS analysis was used involving gradient elution of 5% to 100% CH3CN over 2.7 min on a Waters Acquity BEH C18 2.1 × 50 mm, 5 μm column with a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. Crude samples were dissolved to make DMSO stocks of 50 mg/mL, and then 8 μL was taken up in 400 μL of acetonitrile for analytical solution from which 2 μL injections were made (Pump: Agilent 1200 Binary SL).
Preparative-HPLC Method
Preparative HPLC used narrow gradients chosen based on the analytical results were obtained, with elution increasing of 20% CH3CN over 5 min. Injections of 1 mL each were made from DMSO stocks onto a Waters T3 C18 20 × 150 mm, 5 μm column with a flow rate of 20 mL/min (Gradient Pumps Agilent 1200 Prep G1361A w/gradient extension).
In vitro Assay
All cell lines and assays were used as previously described.23 Briefly, CHO-K1 cells stably expressing the human κ-opioid receptor were purchased from Discoverx Corp. (Fremont, CA, USA; OPRK1 catalogue no. 95-0088C2). These cells were used in the DiscoverX HitHunter® cAMP assay for small molecules assay according to the manufacturer’s directions as described in detail.23
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by DA018151 and GM111385 (to T.E.P), The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (1059B141400648) (to A.Y), Department of Scientific Research Projects of Istanbul Technical University (40258) (to A.Y), GM008545 (to R.S.C) and AFPE Pre-doctoral Fellowship in Pharmaceutical Sciences (to R.S.C). Support for the NMR instrumentation was provided by NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant #S10RR024664 and NSF Major Research Instrumentation Grant #0320648. The content is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, or the National Science Foundation.
Footnotes
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
1H NMR, 13C NMR, mass spectra, and HPLC chromatograms of compounds 1–9; 2D NMR spectra of compound 7; scheme of unsuccessful attempts at synthetic modifications on columbin (1).
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- 1.Huang WY, Chu JH. Acta Chim Sin. 1957;23:210–214. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kohno H, Maeda M, Tanino M, Tsukio Y, Ueda N, Wada K, Sugie S, Mori H, Tanaka T. Cancer Lett. 2002;183:131–139. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(02)00159-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Li R, Morris-Natschke SL, Lee KH. Nat Prod Rep. 2016;33:1166–1226. doi: 10.1039/c5np00137d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Maurya R, Wazir V, Kapil RS. J Indian Chem Soc. 1994;71:361–364. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pathak AK, Jain DC, Sharma RP. Int J Pharm. 1995;33:277–287. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Castro A, Coll J. Nat Prod Commun. 2008;3:1021–1031. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hanson JR. Nat Prod Rep. 2007;24:1332–1341. doi: 10.1039/b705951p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Coll J, Tandrón YA. Phytochem Rev. 2008;7:25–49. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kabouche A, Kabouche Z. Atta-ur-Rahman, editor. Studies in Natural Products Chemistry. Vol. 35. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2008. pp. 753–833. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jagetia GC, Nayak V, Vidyasagar MS. Cancer Lett. 1998;127:71–82. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(98)00047-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu XH, Hu ZL, Shi QR, Zeng HW, Shen YH, Jin HZ, Zhang WD. Arch Pharm Res. 2010;33:981–987. doi: 10.1007/s12272-010-0702-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sarma DNK, Padma P, Khosa RL. Fitoterapia. 1998;69:541–542. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yuan S, Fang J, Tu Qing M, Tu Z, Nie G, Chen L. Chin Pharm J. 2010;10:48–52. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rong Q, Xu M, Dong Q, Zhang YL, Li YL, Ye G, Zhao L. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016;16:331. doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1310-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ma SC, Du J, But PPH, Deng XL, Zhang YW, Ooi VEC, Xu HX, Lee SHS, Lee SF. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002;79:205–211. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(01)00389-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moody JO, Robert VA, Connolly JD, Houghton PJ. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;104:87–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.08.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bruchas MR, Land BB, Chavkin C. Brain Res. 2010;1314:44–55. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.08.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hasebe K, Kawai K, Suzuki T, Kawamura K, Tanaka T, Narita M, Nagase H, Suzuki T. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1025:404–413. doi: 10.1196/annals.1316.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cunningham CW, Rothman RB, Prisinzano TE. Pharmacol Rev. 2011;63:316–347. doi: 10.1124/pr.110.003244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Morani AS, Ewald A, Prevatt-Smith KM, Prisinzano TE, Kivell BM. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013;720:69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.10.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Prisinzano TE. J Med Chem. 2013;56:3435–3443. doi: 10.1021/jm400388u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Prisinzano TE, Rothman RB. Chem Rev. 2008;108:1732–1743. doi: 10.1021/cr0782269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Riley AP, Groer CE, Young D, Ewald AW, Kivell BM, Prisinzano TE. J Med Chem. 2014;57:10464–10475. doi: 10.1021/jm501521d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee DYW, He MS, Kondaveti L, Liu-Chen LY, Ma ZZ, Wang YL, Chen Y, Li JG, Beguin C, Carlezon WA, Cohen B. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005;15:4169–4173. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.06.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Barton DHR, Elad D. J Chem Soc. 1956:2085–2090. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Barton DHR, Elad D. J Chem Soc. 1956:2090–2095. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Beguin C, Duncan KK, Munro TA, Ho DM, Xu W, Liu-Chen LY, Carlezon WA, Cohen BM. Biorg Med Chem. 2009;17:1370–1380. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.12.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tsujikawa K, Kuwayama K, Miyaguchi H, Kanamori T, Iwata YT, Inoue H. Xenobiotica. 2009;39:391–398. doi: 10.1080/00498250902769967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Harding WW, Tidgewell K, Byrd N, Cobb H, Dersch CM, Butelman ER, Rothman RB, Prisinzano TE. J Med Chem. 2005;48:4765–4771. doi: 10.1021/jm048963m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Munro TA, Duncan KK, Xu W, Wang Y, Liu-Chen LY, Carlezon WA, Jr, Cohen BM, Beguin C. Bioorg Med Chem. 2008;16:1279–1286. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2007.10.067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sherwood AM, Crowley RS, Paton KF, Biggerstaff A, Neuenswander B, Day VW, Kivell BM, Prisinzano TE. J Med Chem. 2017;60:3866–3878. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Beguin C, Richards MR, Li JG, Wang YL, Xu W, Liu-Chen LY, Carlezon WA, Cohen BM. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2006;16:4679–4685. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.05.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Munro TA, Rizzacasa MA, Roth BL, Toth BA, Yan F. J Med Chem. 2005;48:345–348. doi: 10.1021/jm049438q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Simpson DS, Katavic PL, Lozama A, Harding WW, Parrish D, Deschamps JR, Dersch CM, Partilla JS, Rothman RB, Navarro H, Prisinzano TE. J Med Chem. 2007;50:3596–3603. doi: 10.1021/jm070393d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Harding WW, Schmidt M, Tidgewell K, Kannan P, Holden KG, Gilmour B, Navarro H, Rothman RB, Prisinzano TE. J Nat Prod. 2006;69:107–112. doi: 10.1021/np050398i. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yang L, Xu W, Chen F, Liu-Chen LY, Ma ZZ, Lee DYW. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009;19:1301–1304. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.01.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



