Abstract
Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is the most toxic enzyme found in the azurophilic granules of neutrophils. MPO utilizes H2O2 to generate hypochlorous acid (HClO) and other reactive moieties, which kill pathogens during infections. In contrast, in the setting of sterile inflammation, MPO and MPO-derived oxidants are thought to be pathogenic, promoting inflammation and causing tissue damage. In contrast, evidence also exists that MPO can limit the extent of immune responses. Elevated MPO levels and activity are observed in a number of autoimmune diseases including in the central nervous system (CNS) of multiple sclerosis (MS) and the joints of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. A pathogenic role for MPO in driving autoimmune inflammation was demonstrated using mouse models. Mechanisms whereby MPO is thought to contribute to disease pathogenesis include tuning of adaptive immune responses and/or the induction of vascular permeability.
Keywords: Autoimmunity, Myeloperoxidase, Oxidative stress, Multiple sclerosis, Rheumatoid arthritis, Neutrophil
1. Introduction
MPO is a myeloid-lineage restricted enzyme with strong antibacterial properties. During myeloid cell differentiation, MPO is largely expressed by neutrophils [1] where is located within azurophilic granules [2]. In addition, studies have also shown that MPO is produced by monocytes/macrophages including peritoneal macrophages and central nervous system (CNS) microglial cells, at least during pathological conditions [3–5]. In bacterial infection, neutrophil-derived MPO generates the potent bactericidal compound hypochlorous acid (HClO) [2,6]. Since neutrophils are important contributors to autoimmune disease pathogenesis it is not surprising that MPO is generally regarded as pathogenic during autoimmune disease progression, although some studies have reported contrary results [7]. The importance of neutrophils in the pathogenesis of a number of autoimmune diseases and the lack of safe and effective strategies to specifically target them, makes MPO a potential therapeutic target.
2. MPO localization to azurophilic granules
The MPO gene is located on the long arm of human chromosome 17 and spans 14 kbp and is induced in a tissue- and differentiation-specific manner [8–10]. Neutrophils are the main source of MPO where it accounts for 5% of the dry weight of the cell [11], making MPO the most abundant protein in neutrophils. MPO is transcribed only in promyelocytes during neutrophil differentiation in the bone marrow [12]. MPO expression is induced by G-CSF, which promotes differentiation of multipotential progenitor cells to granulocytes by regulating the transcription factors C-EBP and PU.1, which drive commitment of the granulocyte-macrophage progenitor to neutrophils and macrophages [13,14]. Neutrophil differentiation leads to decreased MPO transcription, which is undetectable in mature cells [12].
In promyelocytes MPO is packaged into azurophilic granules along with several other antimicrobial proteins, serine proteases and lysosome hydrolases [15]. The packaging of proteins in the azurophilic granules is asynchronous creating heterogeneous populations of azurophilic granules. In promyelocytes there are at least three categories of azurophilic granules. Small electron dense and nucleated azurophilic granules have uniform MPO distribution, while MPO in large spherical granules is detected at the granule rim. In addition, MPO is synthesized by promyelomonocytes, where it accounts for 1% of total cell protein [16]. Monocytes released into the circulation turn off MPO synthesis, which is further downregulated during their differentiation into macrophages [10,15].
3. MPO as a bactericidal compound
Neutrophils are a first line of defense against pathogens and upon entering tissues phagocytize bacteria localizing them to phagosomes where most bacteria are killed and digested [16]. In neutrophils, MPO-containing azurophilic granules fuse with the phagosome and when the common membrane is ruptured the granule contents, including MPO, are released into the phagosome [17]. Myeloid cells, after encountering pathogens, generate a superoxide burst that following dismutation leads to the generation of antibacterial hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [2,6,16]. MPO utilizes H2O2 in the peroxidation (two subsequent one-electron reactions) and ortho-halogenation (two-electron reaction) cycles to generate the extremely potent bactericidal hypochlorous acid (HClO) along with other toxic oxidants [18,19]. In the peroxidation cycle, MPO oxidizes organic substrates, such as tyrosine (Tyr) and tryptophan, and ionic species (nitrite (NO2−), ascorbate, and urate), creating reactive radicals [18]. The halogenation cycle is unique to MPO due to its high oxidative potential that is needed to oxidize (pseudo)halides, such as chloride (Cl−), bromide (Br−), and thiocyanate (SCN−), to HClO, hypobromous acid, and hypothiocynate, respectively [18–21]. Since MPO preferentially oxidizes Cl−, and because Cl− has the highest blood concentrations of all pseudohalides, HOCI is a primary product of MPO activity [16].
Bactericidal activities of HClO and its toxicity for surrounding tissues occur because of its potential to modify lipids, DNA, amines and Tyr forming halohydrins, 5-chlorouracil, chloroamines and 3-chlorotyrosine, respectively [22]. The usual consequence of MPO-mediated macromolecule modification is their fragmentation. Hypochlorite was shown to modify side chains and peptide bonds of proteins leading to formation of chloramides and chloramines, which after conversion to radicals form enhanced peptide bond fragmentation [23–26]. HClO was shown to modify and then induce fragmentation of albumin, ribonuclease A and myoglobin in a concentration and time-dependent manner [26]. Similarly, HClO mediates modification of nucleotides in DNA through the creation of chloramines that undergo decomposition with radical formation leading to crosslinking and DNA denaturation [27,28]. Additionally, hypochlorite targets polysaccharides by interacting with nitrogen in amino sugars. Sugar derivatives undergo decomposition through radical intermediates, ultimately leading to fragmentation of the polysaccharide chain [29,30]. The main effect is the fragmentation of glycosaminoglycans and extracellular matrix [31]. Fragmentation of macromolecules through radical intermediates is relatively fast due to their instability. The presence of chlorinated tyrosines is a stable and specific marker of MPO activity [32].
4. Regulation of MPO expression
MPO expression levels depend upon allelic polymorphisms in the promoter region. A G to A substitution at position −463 (G-463A) leads to a 25-fold decrease in MPO transcription [33]. The substitution occurs within the Alu receptor response element (AluRRE), which is a cluster of nuclear receptor biding sites [33]. The substitution changes the consensus sequence of the Sp1 transcription factor, which is essential for enhanced MPO transcription. A G to A substitution, leading to decreased MPO transcription is also found at position −129 (G-129A) [34]. Alternative splicing of the MPO mRNA gives two transcripts of 3.6 and 2.9 kB [35]. The primary translation product is an 80 kDa precursor protein that undergoes a series of modifications including cleavage of a signal peptide, N-linked glycosylation, and limited deglycosylation, to form the catalytically inactive MPO precursor (apoproMPO) [35,36]. In the next step, MPO gains catalytic activity by incorporation of an iron-heme molecule into the catalytic centrum. Heme is covalently attached by two ester bonds and, unique for heme containing enzymes, a third sulfonium linkage, that uniquely orients one heme molecule into the enzyme pocket [36]. The unique configuration of the heme moiety confers MPO with very high oxidative potential, enabling chlorination at physiological pH [36]. Cleavage of proMPO leads to a 59 kDa α-subunit and a 13.5 kDa β-subunit that are covalently attached through the heme moiety [37]. A disulfide bridge joins the two heavy-light protomers in mature 150 kDa MPO [36,37].
5. Health consequences of MPO deficiency
MPO production is influenced by several genetic mutations and deletions [36]. Prior to automatization of hematological assays, inherited MPO deficiency was regarded as rare and having serious health consequences, such as increased susceptibility to infection, with Candida being the most common, especially in individuals who developed diabetes [38–41]. Now it is known that the incidence of MPO deficiency is quite high affecting 1 in 2000–4000 people in the United States and Europe and 1 in 55,000 people in the Japanese population [38,42]. MPO-deficiency is still associated with a higher occurrence of severe infections and chronic inflammatory process; however, ∼50% of individuals remain asymptomatic [43,44]. Of interest, MPO deficiency is highly beneficial in cardiovascular integrity as demonstrated by decreased occurrence of myocardial infarction [44]. No association of MPO-deficiency with cancer susceptibility has been reported [44].
The lack of severe infections in some MPO-deficient individuals is not completely surprising when the role of H2O2 as a bactericidal compound is taken into account. H2O2 is produced during the oxidative burst by NADPH oxidase. Impaired assembly of NADPH oxidase due to a mutation in the NADPH-oxidase subunit gp94 gene thereby blocking production of H2O2 is observed in chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) patients [45]. These patients suffer from fatal infections, which are prevented when patients are infected with H2O2-producing bacteria, such as strains of streptococci, pneumococci, and lactobacilli [46]. These data indicate that even low levels of H2O2 are sufficient to activate H2O2-dependent killing mechanisms. Strains of Streptococcus faecalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae that produce diminished levels of H2O2, are killed less efficiently than WT strains by CGD leukocytes [22]. An intact respiratory burst in MPO-deficiency leads to abnormally slow killing of Serratia marcescens and Staphylococcus aureus 502A [41]. These data indicate that H2O2 is a critical anti-bacterial compound as it mediates killing of pathogens directly and indirectly by activating an MPO-dependent mechanism. While the presence of MPO is not crucial for pathogen elimination, it greatly increases the efficacy of the process.
6. The impact of MPO on neutrophil function
Besides antimicrobial molecules found in neutrophil granules, neutrophils also generate neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) that are DNA structures released due to decondensation of chromatin [47,48] (Fig. 1). A number of proteins are bound to the NETs including histones and granule proteins including elastase, cathepsin G and MPO [47,48]. There are three described models of NETosis [48]. The first model is suicidal NETosis and is induced by various stimuli that activate neutrophils leading to the activation of the NADPH oxidase complex and increased cytosolic Ca2+ that ultimately results in deamination of histones allowing the decondensation of chromatin and is dependent upon ROS and PKC/Raf/MERK/ERK [48,49]. In vital NETosis occurs in response to recognition of stimuli through toll-like receptors and the C3 complement receptor and is characterized by release of nuclear DNA without loss of the nuclear or plasma membrane [48,50,51]. In a second vital NETosis model, mitochondrial DNA is released through the recognition of C5a or LPS [52].
Fig. 1.
The influence of MPO on the immune responses. The immune response induced by subcutaneous injection of OVA/LPS or OVA/CFA, leads to recruitment of neutrophils to the local lymph node where they are activated releasing NETs and MPO. MPO released from neutrophils limits the activation of DC as measured by CD86 expression and reduced IL-12 production. Consequently, T cell proliferation and proinflammatory cytokine production is reduced. Consistent with this, MPO-deficient mice have enhanced antigen induced arthritis (AIA). However, the reduced disease severity in MPO-deficient mice in the K/BxN arthritis and collagen induced arthritis (CIA) mouse models, indicates that MPO can also be pathogenic in disease.
NETs not only trap bacteria, but also modulate many aspects of both the innate and adaptive immune response [53]. In the innate immune response, NETs were shown to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome that utilized P2X7 receptor-mediated potassium efflux, resulting in the release of IL-1β and IL-18 [54]. NETs were reported to modulate adaptive immune responses by inhibiting LPS-induced monocyte DC maturation, thereby suppressing T cell activation [55]. Activated neutrophils release NETs 2–4 h after activation by a variety of stimuli and is associated with a novel form of cell death that is dependent upon the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by NADPH oxidase as indicated by the lack of NET formation in patients with CGD that carry mutations in NADPH oxidase [56]. The downstream events leading to cell death and NET formation was shown to be mediated by neutrophil elastase, a component of azurophilic granules, that upon translocation to the nucleus partially degrades specific histones leading to chromatin decondensation [57]. The role of MPO in the process is to synergize with elastase to drive chromatin decondensation in a manner independent of its enzymatic activity [57]. More recently it was shown that intragranular MPO processing of ROS was required to trigger NET formation [58]. Mechanistically, MPO-derived HClO was shown to be the required ROS for NET formation in human neutrophils [59]. The above findings are consistent with neutrophils from MPO−/− humans lacking NET formation following activation with PMA [60]. In a separate study, the requirement for MPO following PMA activation of neutrophils was also shown, but bacteria were able to induce NETs independent of MPO. Thus the precise inflammatory conditions that promote a particular NETosis mechanism in an MPO-dependent manner is not clear [61].
7. The influence of MPO on the immune responses
An important step in the initiation of the adaptive immune response is the activation and migration of tissue dendritic cells (DC) to the draining lymph node (Fig. 1). To investigate whether MPO impacts adaptive immune responses, WT and Mpo−/− mice were immunized with OVA emulsified in CFA and T cell responses were measured both in vivo and in vitro (Fig. 1). While T cell activation and proliferation were not different in unimmunized mice, they were both increased in Mpo−/− mice in the lymph node and spleen 6 days after immunization [62] (Fig. 1). When splenocytes were stimulated with OVA in vitro, Mpo−/− T cells produced higher levels of IFN-γ and IL-17A [62]. These cumulative data indicate that MPO suppresses adaptive immune responses, which was further shown by enhanced T cell-mediated skin delayed type hypersensitivity and antigen-induced arthritis in Mpo−/− mice [62] (Fig. 1). When the mechanism of MPO suppression of adaptive immunity was investigated, it was found that neutrophils and MPO directly interacted with DC in the lymph node [62]. In addition, it was found that co-culture of neutrophils with DC increased their production of MPO and that enzymatically active MPO inhibited LPS-induced DC activation in a dose-dependent manner as measured by decreased IL-12 production and CD86 expression [62] (Fig. 1). Using in vitro assays, the mechanism whereby MPO suppresses DC activation was determined to be dependent upon MPO-generated oxidants and DC CD11b expression [62]. These data demonstrate that MPO can limit the extent of an adaptive immune response by attenuation of DC activation thereby reducing both their migration to the draining lymph node and antigen presentation capacity (Fig. 1). However, it is worth noting that DC activation, characterized by increased IL-12 production, is also inhibited by nitric oxide (NO) [63]. NO is consumed by MPO, which is known as an NO-oxidase, implying that MPO could lead to the activation of DC by limiting NO availability [64] (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
MPO and the vasculature. Leukocyte transmigration across the endothelium is supported by electrostatic interactions between positively charged MPO and the cell membrane containing charged heparin-sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG). Additionally, MPO generates HClO that increases endothelial permeability. Released MPO is transcytosed and deposited in the vascular extracellular matrix (ECM). In the ECM, MPO utilizes NO, leading to impaired vascular relaxation and the generation of NO2−, which modifies the ECM component fibronectin.
8. MPO and the vasculature
Leukocyte entry into the site of inflammation is regulated by the endothelial barrier [65]. A series of well described events, rolling, binding and diapedesis lead to extravasation into the tissues [65] (Fig. 2). Transmigration is supported by weakened interactions between adjacent endothelial cells [65]. MPO is regarded as an important modulator of vasculature functioning, being associated with chronic vascular diseases such as atherosclerosis and chronic coronary disease [66]. After being released, MPO interaction with the vasculature is supported by electrostatic forces between positively charged MPO and negatively charged heparin-sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG) associated with the endothelium and negatively charged albumin [67,68] (Fig. 2). Both MPO transcytosis and deposition in the vascular extracellular matrix (ECM) was shown to occur independently of neutrophil transmigration [69] (Fig. 2). In the vascular ECM, MPO works as an NO-oxidase, consuming NO that leads to impaired endothelial relaxation [64] (Fig. 2). An additional mechanism whereby MPO likely alters endothelium function is through its nitrotyrosination of the ECM component fibronectin [70] (Fig. 2). How this impacts endothelial barrier function is unknown. Interestingly, neutrophils were shown to deliver MPO directly to endothelial cells that required cell-cell interactions dependent upon the integrin Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) [71].
9. Influence of MPO on cytokine production during lung inflammation
Cytokine production by Mpo−/− neutrophils varies substantially depending on the type of pathogen associated molecular pattern signal received. Mpo−/− peritoneal cavity neutrophils stimulated in vitro with the toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 agonist zymosan, had increased production of proinflammatory MIP-1α, MIP-1β, IL-1α, IL-1β, and TNF-α as compared to WT [72]. This finding correlated to in vivo findings as indicated by a similar increase in the same cytokines in Mpo−/− mice following zymosan administration [72]. Similarly, it was found that Mpo−/− mice with zymosan-induced lung inflammation exhibited elevated levels of MIP-2, which correlated with increased number of neutrophils in the lung [73]. In contrast, when the TLR4 agonist LPS was used to induce acute lung inflammation, neutrophil numbers were not increased in the lung of Mpo−/− mice as was observed in WT mice [74]. This finding correlated with decreased levels of the cyokines IL-4, IL-6, IL-9, IL-13 and IFN-γ and the chemokines KC, MIP-1α and RANTES in the lung of Mpo−/− mice [74]. When stimulated with LPS in vitro, Mpo−/− neutrophils expressed decreased levels of KC and MIP-1α as observed in the lung, while IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α were increased [74]. Of interest, the reduced numbers of neutrophils in the lung of Mpo−/− mice was suggested to be due to decreased migration to KC, as indicated by in vitro migration assays [74]. It is not clear why MPO-deficiency differentially alters responsiveness to TLR ligands in lung injury, but it could be due to either direct or indirect stimulation of different cells types that produce the cytokines. This was addressed using alveolar macrophages from rats stimulated with either active or enzymatically inactive MPO [75]. Both forms of MPO increased macrophage respiratory burst, intracellular killing of Candida albicans and TFN-α production [75]. MPO also induced the production of IL-1α and IL-1β message in the alveolar macrophages [75]. These data demonstrate that MPO could directly induce the production of proinflammatory cytokines by alveolar macrophages in the lung.
10. MPO and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
RA is a chronic autoimmune disease leading to joint damage and cartilage erosion. The inflammatory response in RA is complex being dependent on both T cells and antibodies [76]. In numerous RA mouse models, neutrophils have been shown to be a prominent cellular component inside inflamed joints [77]. In addition, neutrophils from RA patients were shown to exhibit an increase in the spontaneous generation of NETs in vitro that was associated with MPO expression [78]. Pathogenesis of neutrophils in arthritis was demonstrated by attenuation of disease severity due to their depletion in both the K/BxN antibody-mediated arthritis and collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) models [79–81]. A specific role for MPO in both the K/BxN and CIA models was indicated by reduced disease severity in Mpo−/− mice [82] (Fig. 2). Of particular interest is the finding that adaptive immune responses were enhanced in Mpo−/− mice with CIA (Fig. 2). These data suggest that MPO may have a direct impact on inflammation in the joint that is independent of the underlying immune response. This concept is supported by the finding that both intracellular and extracellular MPO was shown to be present in the synovium of RA patients [82]. In addition, RA patients were shown to have increased plasma levels of MPO compared to healthy controls [83,84]. However, there was inconsistency as to the correlation between MPO levels in the plasma and disease activity score, as one study showed correlation, while another did not [83,84]. Additionally, RA patients exhibited higher levels of MPO and its product Cl-Tyr in synovial fluids compared to osteoarthritis (OA) patients [85]. RA patients treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and/or biological agents exhibited decreased MPO-specific activity in the joints [85]. These data correlate well with murine studies, where injection of active or inactive MPO into the joints exacerbated disease, while decreased MPO levels in affected joints, observed after treatment with atrovastatin or blockade of CXCR1/CXCR2 receptors, correlated with decreased severity disease [86–88].
11. MPO in multiple sclerosis (MS)
MS is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) mediated by T cells recognizing myelin antigens and characterized by immune cell infiltration, demyelization and neuronal damage [89,90]. The animal model that shares features of MS is experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) [91]. Interestingly, EAE was almost completely attenuated by depletion of neutrophils [92–94]. Although, the role of neutrophils in the progression of MS and EAE needs further clarification, it is not surprising that their main constituent MPO is gaining acceptance as an important modulator of disease severity.
An association between MPO and MS is suggested by linkage between the 192 bp allele of the D17S957 microsatellite region of MPO with MS in the British population [95]. However, two other studies showed that the 17q22–23 chromosomal region, which contains the MPO gene, is not strongly associated with MS [96,97]. Since MPO levels are influenced by promoter polymorphisms, several studies have examined its correlation with MS incidence. Early studies correlated the G allele at -463, which is associated with higher levels of MPO, with increased incidence of early onset MS in females in the American population [5]. Similarly, this allele was found in 96% of MS patients in Poland [98]. In contrast, MS in individuals from Olmsted county in the USA carrying the A allele was not associated with gender, age at onset, susceptibility or altered course or severity of disease [99]. Since these studies contained less than 200 individuals, a Swedish group reevaluated the association using almost 900 patients and 600 controls and concluded there was no influence of the MPO promoter polymorphisms at -463 and -129 positions on MS susceptibility [100].
Although the association between the level of MPO transcripts and MS is unclear, MPO activity is thought to play a role in MS. Higher serum levels of MPO were found in Japanese patients with conventional and opticospinal MS at remission [101]. In healthy individuals, MPO is not detected in macrophages/microglia cells in the CNS; however, during MS, MPO was detected in microglia/macrophages in and around MS lesions [5,102]. Each subtype of MS (acute, relapsing-remitting, primary and secondary progressive) has a unique pattern of demyelinating lesions. In patients with acute and relapsing MS presents with focal changes in white matter, while progressive MS is characterized by diffused changes in normal-appearing white matter and cortex [103]. In patients with primary and secondary MS, MPO activity is increased in areas of cortical demyelization and in active demyelization in brain white matter, while MPO activity was not significantly increased in non-active lesions [102,104]. In patients with acute or early relapsing MS, active lesions contained macrophage/microglial cells expressing MPO [5]. A unique lesion, characterized by low demyelization and axonal injury but with the presence of MPO-containing macrophage/microglial cells was observed in patients with acute or early relapsing MS [4,105]. It was suggested that the areas of activated microglial cells precede formation of these lesions, which develop into active demyelinated plaques [4].
MS plaques are detected by DTPA-gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [106]. DTPA-Gd passes through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) disrupted by inflammation. Subtle focal changes in normal-appearing white matter, without overt demyelization and T cell infiltration are not visible using conventional MRI [107]. Since early diagnosis and prompt treatment reduces relapse and slows axonal damage, and production of MPO precedes formation of active plaques with demyelination and overt inflammation, a new method based on MPO-targeted MRI was introduced [108]. In this technique, MPO in the presence of H2O2 radicalizes the sensor leading to its oligomerization [108]. The oligomers bind to proteins, retaining it at the site of focal change and enabling its visualization using T1-weighted MRI [108]. Another method for visualization of inflammatory lesions using MPO is based on bioluminescence [109]. Although this method was not tested in a mouse model of MS, it was very successful in the visualization of changes in acute dermatitis, allergic contact hypersensitivity, arthritis and some tumors [109]. Inflammatory lesions were visualized based on detection of blue light, emitted by luminol oxidized by MPO [109]. Interestingly, when the MPO-sensitive probe MPO-Gd was used to visualize EAE severity, it was shown that inhibition of MPO with 4-aminobenzoic acid hydrazide decreased lesion volume, confirming that targeting MPO could be a relevant therapeutic strategy in MS [110]. In addition, MPO-Gd was superior to DTP-Gd at detecting subclinical inflammatory lesions even in the absence of overt BBB breakdown, and showed that the number of MPO-Gd-enhancing lesions correlated with the infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages producing MPO [102,111].
Although neutrophils are not typically found in MS lesions, likely due to their short-half life in tissues, evidence is mounting supporting their role in MS pathogenesis [112]. Two separate studies reported that neutrophils in MS patients expressing a primed phenotype were increased in the peripheral blood as assessed in vitro by higher levels of degranulation and oxidative burst that correlated with higher levels of NETs in the serum [113,114]. In addition, it was found that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was highly increased in MS patients undergoing relapse, and was a predictor of disability progression [115]. Additional evidence for neutrophil activity in MS is the increase in serum CXCL8 (IL-8), a chemoattractant for neutrophils in humans [116]. In a separate study, an increase in the granulocyte recruiting chemokine CXCL5 was reported in the plasma of relapsing MS during new lesion formation [117]. This same study showed that plasma levels of CXCL1 (neutrophil chemoattractant), CXCL5 and neutrophil elastase directly correlated with MS disability and lesion volume [117]. Finally, post-mortem tissue from a MS patient affected by relapse following cessation of natalizumab showed a prominent neutrophil infiltration in regions of BBB leakage [118].
Increased BBB permeability is a feature of EAE, being associated with disease onset and neutrophils are thought to be important contributors to this process, likely by a MPO-dependent mechanism [93,118,119]. Using a primary brain microvascular endothelial cell line, it was shown that MPO can directly alter permeability in vitro [120]. In our studies utilizing the novel MPO inhibitor N-acetyl lysyltyrosylcysteine amide (KYC) [121], we found that its daily administration starting at disease initiation did not alter the day of onset or the kinetics of the first seven days of disease progression after which disease progression stalled resulting in a significantly reduced peak and cumulative disease score [122]. These data indicate, that at least in EAE, MPO does not play an essential role in the process of peripheral CD4 T cell priming that is required for EAE onset. When KYC was administered therapeutically starting at the peak of disease there was an immediate and significant decrease in disease severity [122]. After only 5 days of KYC treatment there was a significant reduction in the number of macrophages and neutrophils in the CNS [122]. Interestingly, there was no reduction in the number of IL-17 and/or IFN-γ secreting CD4 T cells [122]. These data further support the concept that MPO can contribute to disease pathogenesis in the absence of specific effects on adaptive immunity. In the same experiment, we showed that the BBB was completely sealed after five days of MPO inhibition [122]. Further data supporting a role for MPO in opening of the BBB is a study that transiently opened the barrier by LPS injection, which lead to significantly less CNS vascular permeability in Mpo−/− mice as compared to WT [120]. Cumulatively, these data suggest a role for neutrophil-derived MPO in the breakdown of the BBB contributing to MS disease progression in the absence of a direct impact on adaptive immunity.
12. Conclusion
MPO is the most cytotoxic and abundant enzyme expressed by neutrophils, and in addition to having direct anti-bacterial properties, it has emerged as a modulator of the adaptive immune response in certain contexts. Increased MPO activity and protein levels have been observed in many inflammatory conditions. MS and RA are the most prominent examples among autoimmune disorders, which according to their mouse models are exacerbated by MPO activity. Moreover, while MPO was shown to negatively impact the extent of adaptive immune responses, the evidence suggests that it tunes, but does not inhibit, proinflammatory processes. At least in EAE, if negative tuning of the adaptive immune response occurs by MPO, then it must be below the threshold of that which is required for disease onset and progression of disease. Given that elevated MPO activity is associated with a number of inflammatory diseases and the clinical data indicate that MPO deficiency does not necessarily preclude an individual to increased life threatening infections this supports the idea that MPO is a valid and promising therapeutic target. Finally, therapeutic targeting of MPO, a component of innate immunity, has an advantage over therapies that directly and profoundly impact adaptive immunity.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants R01 AI069358 (B.N.D), 1R56AI122655 (B.N.D), HL 102836 (K.L.P.) and HL 128371 (K.L.P.); the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (B.N.D); the Bloodcenter Research Foundation (B.N.D); and the Blood Research Institute Gallager Fellowship (A.S.).
References
- 1.Nichols BA, Bainton DF. Differentiation of human monocytes in bone marrow and blood. Sequential formation of two granule populations. Lab Invest. 1973;29:27–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Oren A, Taylor JM. The subcellular localization of defensins and myeloperoxidase in human neutrophils: immunocytochemical evidence for azurophil granule heterogeneity. J Lab Clin Med. 1995;125:340–347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.de Araujo TH, Okada SS, Ghosn EE, Taniwaki NN, Rodrigues MR, de Almeida SR, Mortara RA, Russo M, Campa A, Albuquerque RC. Intracellular localization of myeloperoxidase in murine peritoneal B-lymphocytes and macrophages. Cell Immunol. 2013;281:27–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2013.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marik C, Felts PA, Bauer J, Lassmann H, Smith KJ. Lesion genesis in a subset of patients with multiple sclerosis: a role for innate immunity? Brain. 2007;130:2800–2815. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nagra RM, Becher B, Tourtellotte WW, Antel JP, Gold D, Paladino T, Smith RA, Nelson JR, Reynolds WF. Immunohistochemical and genetic evidence of myeloperoxidase involvement in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 1997;78:97–107. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(97)00089-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Harrison JE, Schultz J. Studies on the chlorinating activity of myeloperoxidase. J Biol Chem. 1976;251:1371–1374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Navegantes KC, de Souza Gomes R, Pereira PA, Czaikoski PG, Azevedo CH, Monteiro MC. Immune modulation of some autoimmune diseases: the critical role of macrophages and neutrophils in the innate and adaptive immunity. J Transl Med. 2017;15:36. doi: 10.1186/s12967-017-1141-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Johnson KR, Nauseef WM, Care A, Wheelock MJ, Shane S, Hudson S, Koeffler HP, Selsted M, Miller C, Rovera G. Characterization of cDNA clones for human myeloperoxidase: predicted amino acid sequence and evidence for multiple mRNA species. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15:2013–2028. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.5.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lubbert M, Miller CW, Koeffler HP. Changes of DNA methylation and chromatin structure in the human myeloperoxidase gene during myeloid differentiation. Blood. 1991;78:345–356. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tobler A, Miller CW, Johnson KR, Selsted ME, Rovera G, Koeffler HP. Regulation of gene expression of myeloperoxidase during myeloid differentiation. J Cell Physiol. 1988;136:215–225. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041360203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schultz J, Kaminker K. Myeloperoxidase of the leucocyte of normal human blood. I. Content and localization. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1962;96:465–467. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(62)90321-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Agner K. Verdoperoxidse: a ferment isolated from leucocytes. Acta Physiol Scand. 1941;2:1–62. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bendall LJ, Bradstock KF. G-CSF: from granulopoietic stimulant to bone marrow stem cell mobilizing agent. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2014;25:355–367. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ford AM, Bennett CA, Healy LE, Towatari M, Greaves MF, Enver T. Regulation of the myeloperoxidase enhancer binding proteins Pu1, C-EBP alpha, -beta, and -delta during granulocyte-lineage specification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:10838–10843. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gullberg U, Bengtsson N, Bulow E, Garwicz D, Lindmark A, Olsson I. Processing and targeting of granule proteins in human neutrophils. J Immunol Methods. 1999;232:201–210. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(99)00177-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Klebanoff SJ, Kettle AJ, Rosen H, Winterbourn CC, Nauseef WM. Myeloperoxidase: a front-line defender against phagocytosed microorganisms. J Leukoc Biol. 2013;93:185–198. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0712349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hirsch JG, Cohn ZA. Degranulation of polymorphonuclear leucocytes following phagocytosis of microorganisms. J Exp Med. 1960;112:1005–1014. doi: 10.1084/jem.112.6.1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pattison DI, Davies MJ. Reactions of myeloperoxidase-derived oxidants with biological substrates: gaining chemical insight into human inflammatory diseases. Curr Med Chem. 2006;13:3271–3290. doi: 10.2174/092986706778773095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Spalteholz H, Panasenko OM, Arnhold J. Formation of reactive halide species by myeloperoxidase and eosinophil peroxidase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2006;445:225–234. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2005.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Klebanoff SJ. Myeloperoxidase-halide-hydrogen peroxide antibacterial system. J Bacteriol. 1968;95:2131–2138. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.6.2131-2138.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Thomas EL, Fishman M. Oxidation of chloride and thiocyanate by isolated leukocytes. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:9694–9702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Klebanoff SJ. Myeloperoxidase: friend and foe. J Leukoc Biol. 2005;77:598–625. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1204697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Baker RW. Studies on the reaction between sodium hypochlorite and proteins; physicochemical study of the course of the reaction. Biochem J. 1947;41:337–342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Drozdz R, Guevara I, Naskalski JW. Immunoglobulin cleavage by hypochlorous acid treatment. Clin Chim Acta. 1995;236:155–160. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(95)06048-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sharonov BP, Govorova N, Lyzlova SN. Serum protein degradation by hypochlorite. Biochem Int. 1989;19:27–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hawkins CL, Davies MJ. Hypochlorite-induced damage to proteins: formation of nitrogen-centred radicals from lysine residues and their role in protein fragmentation. Biochem J. 1998;332(Pt. 3):617–625. doi: 10.1042/bj3320617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hawkins CL, Davies MJ. Hypochlorite-induced damage to nucleosides: formation of chloramines and nitrogen-centered radicals. Chem Res Toxicol. 2001;14:1071–1081. doi: 10.1021/tx010071r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Prutz WA. Hypochlorous acid interactions with thiols, nucleotides, DNA, and other biological substrates. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1996;332:110–120. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1996.0322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hawkins CL, Davies MJ. Degradation of hyaluronic acid, poly- and monosaccharides, and model compounds by hypochlorite: evidence for radical intermediates and fragmentation. Free Radic Biol Med. 1998;24:1396–1410. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(98)00009-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rees MD, Hawkins CL, Davies MJ. Hypochlorite-mediated fragmentation of hyaluronan, chondroitin sulfates, and related N-acetyl glycosamines: evidence for chloramide intermediates, free radical transfer reactions, and site-specific fragmentation. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:13719–13733. doi: 10.1021/ja0370591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McGowan SE. Mechanisms of extracellular matrix proteoglycan degradation by human neutrophils. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1990;2:271–279. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb/2.3.271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hazen SL, Heinecke JW. 3-Chlorotyrosine, a specific marker of myeloperoxidase-catalyzed oxidation, is markedly elevated in low density lipoprotein isolated from human atherosclerotic intima. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:2075–2081. doi: 10.1172/JCI119379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Piedrafita FJ, Molander RB, Vansant G, Orlova EA, Pfahl M, Reynolds WF. An Alu element in the myeloperoxidase promoter contains a composite SP1-thyroid hormone-retinoic acid response element. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:14412–14420. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.24.14412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hoy A, Tregouet D, Leininger-Muller B, Poirier O, Maurice M, Sass C, Siest G, Tiret L, Visvikis S. Serum myeloperoxidase concentration in a healthy population: biological variations, familial resemblance and new genetic polymorphisms. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001;9:780–786. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hashinaka K, Nishio C, Hur SJ, Sakiyama F, Tsunasawa S, Yamada M. Multiple species of myeloperoxidase messenger RNAs produced by alternative splicing and differential polyadenylation. Biochemistry. 1988;27:5906–5914. doi: 10.1021/bi00416a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hansson M, Olsson I, Nauseef WM. Biosynthesis, processing, and sorting of human myeloperoxidase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2006;445:214–224. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2005.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nauseef WM, Olsson I, Arnljots K. Biosynthesis and processing of myeloperoxidase – a marker for myeloid cell differentiation. Eur J Haematol. 1988;40:97–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1988.tb00805.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Parry MF, Root RK, Metcalf JA, Delaney KK, Kaplow LS, Richar WJ. Myeloperoxidase deficiency: prevalence and clinical significance. Ann Intern Med. 1981;95:293–301. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-95-3-293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cramer R, Soranzo MR, Dri P, Rottini GD, Bramezza M, Cirielli S, Patriarca P. Incidence of myeloperoxidase deficiency in an area of northern Italy: histochemical, biochemical and functional studies. Br J Haematol. 1982;51:81–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1982.tb07292.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cech P, Papathanassiou A, Boreux G, Roth P, Miescher PA. Hereditary myeloperoxidase deficiency. Blood. 1979;53:403–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lehrer RI, Cline MJ. Leukocyte myeloperoxidase deficiency and disseminated candidiasis: the role of myeloperoxidase in resistance to Candida infection. J Clin Invest. 1969;48:1478–1488. doi: 10.1172/JCI106114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kameoka Y, Persad AS, Suzuki K. Genomic variations in myeloperoxidase gene in the Japanese population. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2004;57:S12–S13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kutter D. Prevalence of myeloperoxidase deficiency: population studies using Bayer-Technicon automated hematology. J Mol Med (Berl) 1998;76:669–675. doi: 10.1007/s001090050266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kutter D, Devaquet P, Vanderstocken G, Paulus JM, Marchal V, Gothot A. Consequences of total and subtotal myeloperoxidase deficiency: risk or benefit? Acta Haematol. 2000;104:10–15. doi: 10.1159/000041062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Segal BH, Leto TL, Gallin JI, Malech HL, Holland SM. Genetic, biochemical, and clinical features of chronic granulomatous disease. Medicine (Baltimore) 2000;79:170–200. doi: 10.1097/00005792-200005000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mandell GL, Hook EW. Leukocyte bactericidal activity in chronic granuloma-tous disease: correlation of bacterial hydrogen peroxide production and susceptibility to intracellular killing. J Bacteriol. 1969;100:531–532. doi: 10.1128/jb.100.1.531-532.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, Weinrauch Y, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science. 2004;303:1532–1535. doi: 10.1126/science.1092385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Delgado-Rizo V, Martinez-Guzman MA, Iniguez-Gutierrez L, Garcia-Orozco A, Alvarado-Navarro A, Fafutis-Morris M. Neutrophil extracellular traps and its implications in inflammation: an overview. Front Immunol. 2017;8:81. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pilsczek FH, Salina D, Poon KK, Fahey C, Yipp BG, Sibley CD, Robbins SM, Green FH, Surette MG, Sugai M, Bowden MG, Hussain M, Zhang K, Kubes P. A novel mechanism of rapid nuclear neutrophil extracellular trap formation in response to Staphylococcus aureus. J Immunol. 2010;185:7413–7425. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Byrd AS, O’Brien XM, Johnson CM, Lavigne LM, Reichner JS. An extracellular matrix-based mechanism of rapid neutrophil extracellular trap formation in response to Candida albicans. J Immunol. 2013;190:4136–4148. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Clark SR, Ma AC, Tavener SA, McDonald B, Goodarzi Z, Kelly MM, Patel KD, Chakrabarti S, McAvoy E, Sinclair GD, Keys EM, Allen-Vercoe E, Devinney R, Doig CJ, Green FH, Kubes P. Platelet TLR4 activates neutrophil extracellular traps to ensnare bacteria in septic blood. Nat Med. 2007;13:463–469. doi: 10.1038/nm1565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yousefi S, Mihalache C, Kozlowski E, Schmid I, Simon HU. Viable neutrophils release mitochondrial DNA to form neutrophil extracellular traps. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16:1438–1444. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Grayson PC, Kaplan MJ. At the Bench: neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) highlight novel aspects of innate immune system involvement in autoimmune diseases. J Leukoc Biol. 2016;99:253–264. doi: 10.1189/jlb.5BT0615-247R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kahlenberg JM, Carmona-Rivera C, Smith CK, Kaplan MJ. Neutrophil extracellular trap-associated protein activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome is enhanced in lupus macrophages. J Immunol. 2013;190:1217–1226. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Barrientos L, Bignon A, Gueguen C, de Chaisemartin L, Gorges R, Sandre C, Mascarell L, Balabanian K, Kerdine-Romer S, Pallardy M, Marin-Esteban V, Chollet-Martin S. Neutrophil extracellular traps downregulate lipopolysaccharide-induced activation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2014;193:5689–5698. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fuchs TA, Abed U, Goosmann C, Hurwitz R, Schulze I, Wahn V, Weinrauch Y, Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A. Novel cell death program leads to neutrophil extracellular traps. J Cell Biol. 2007;176:231–241. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200606027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Papayannopoulos V, Metzler KD, Hakkim A, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase regulate the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. J Cell Biol. 2010;191:677–691. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201006052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bjornsdottir H, Welin A, Michaelsson E, Osla V, Berg S, Christenson K, Sundqvist M, Dahlgren C, Karlsson A, Bylund J. Neutrophil NET formation is regulated from the inside by myeloperoxidase-processed reactive oxygen species. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;89:1024–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.10.398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Akong-Moore K, Chow OA, von Kockritz-Blickwede M, Nizet V. Influences of chloride and hypochlorite on neutrophil extracellular trap formation. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Metzler KD, Fuchs TA, Nauseef WM, Reumaux D, Roesler J, Schulze I, Wahn V, Papayannopoulos V, Zychlinsky A. Myeloperoxidase is required for neutrophil extracellular trap formation: implications for innate immunity. Blood. 2011;117:953–959. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-290171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Parker H, Dragunow M, Hampton MB, Kettle AJ, Winterbourn CC. Requirements for NADPH oxidase and myeloperoxidase in neutrophil extracellular trap formation differ depending on the stimulus. J Leukoc Biol. 2012;92:841–849. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1211601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Odobasic D, Kitching AR, Yang Y, O’Sullivan KM, Muljadi RC, Edgtton KL, Tan DS, Summers SA, Morand EF, Holdsworth SR. Neutrophil myeloperox-idase regulates T-cell-driven tissue inflammation in mice by inhibiting dendritic cell function. Blood. 2013;121:4195–4204. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-456483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Xiong H, Zhu C, Li F, Hegazi R, He K, Babyatsky M, Bauer AJ, Plevy SE. Inhibition of interleukin-12 p40 transcription and NF-kappaB activation by nitric oxide in murine macrophages and dendritic cells. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:10776–10783. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M313416200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Eiserich JP, Baldus S, Brennan ML, Ma W, Zhang C, Tousson A, Castro L, Lusis AJ, Nauseef WM, White CR, Freeman BA. Myeloperoxidase, a leukocyte-derived vascular NO oxidase. Science. 2002;296:2391–2394. doi: 10.1126/science.1106830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Filippi MD. Mechanism of diapedesis: importance of the transcellular route. Adv Immunol. 2016;129:25–53. doi: 10.1016/bs.ai.2015.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Teng N, Maghzal GJ, Talib J, Rashid I, Lau AK, Stocker R. The roles of myeloperoxidase in coronary artery disease and its potential implication in plaque rupture. Redox Rep. 2016:1–23. doi: 10.1080/13510002.2016.1256119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Klinke A, Nussbaum C, Kubala L, Friedrichs K, Rudolph TK, Rudolph V, Paust HJ, Schroder C, Benten D, Lau D, Szocs K, Furtmuller PG, Heeringa P, Sydow K, Duchstein HJ, Ehmke H, Schumacher U, Meinertz T, Sperandio M, Baldus S. Myeloperoxidase attracts neutrophils by physical forces. Blood. 2011;117:1350–1358. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-284513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tiruppathi C, Naqvi T, Wu Y, Vogel SM, Minshall RD, Malik AB. Albumin mediates the transcytosis of myeloperoxidase by means of caveolae in endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:7699–7704. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401712101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Baldus S, Eiserich JP, Mani A, Castro L, Figueroa M, Chumley P, Ma W, Tousson A, White CR, Bullard DC, Brennan ML, Lusis AJ, Moore KP, Freeman BA. Endothelial transcytosis of myeloperoxidase confers specificity to vascular ECM proteins as targets of tyrosine nitration. J Clin Invest. 2001;108:1759–1770. doi: 10.1172/JCI12617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Baldus S, Eiserich JP, Brennan ML, Jackson RM, Alexander CB, Freeman BA. Spatial mapping of pulmonary and vascular nitrotyrosine reveals the pivotal role of myeloperoxidase as a catalyst for tyrosine nitration in inflammatory diseases. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002;33:1010. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(02)00993-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Jerke U, Rolle S, Purfurst B, Luft FC, Nauseef WM, Kettritz R. Beta2 integrin-mediated cell-cell contact transfers active myeloperoxidase from neutrophils to endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:12910–12919. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.434613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Endo D, Saito T, Umeki Y, Suzuki K, Aratani Y. Myeloperoxidase negatively regulates the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines by zymosan-induced mouse neutrophils. Inflamm Res. 2016;65:151–159. doi: 10.1007/s00011-015-0899-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Takeuchi K, Umeki Y, Matsumoto N, Yamamoto K, Yoshida M, Suzuki K, Aratani Y. Severe neutrophil-mediated lung inflammation in myeloperoxidase-deficient mice exposed to zymosan. Inflamm Res. 2012;61:197–205. doi: 10.1007/s00011-011-0401-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Haegens A, Heeringa P, van Suylen RJ, Steele C, Aratani Y, O’Donoghue RJ, Mutsaers SE, Mossman BT, Wouters EF, Vernooy JH. Myeloperoxidase deficiency attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung inflammation and subsequent cytokine and chemokine production. J Immunol. 2009;182:7990–7996. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0800377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Grattendick K, Stuart R, Roberts E, Lincoln J, Lefkowitz SS, Bollen A, Moguilevsky N, Friedman H, Lefkowitz DL. Alveolar macrophage activation by myeloperoxidase: a model for exacerbation of lung inflammation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2002;26:716–722. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.26.6.4723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Imboden JB. The immunopathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2009;4:417–434. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathol.4.110807.092254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Asquith DL, Miller AM, McInnes IB, Liew FY. Animal models of rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39:2040–2044. doi: 10.1002/eji.200939578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Sur Chowdhury C, Giaglis S, Walker UA, Buser A, Hahn S, Hasler P. Enhanced neutrophil extracellular trap generation in rheumatoid arthritis: analysis of underlying signal transduction pathways and potential diagnostic utility. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16:R122. doi: 10.1186/ar4579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Wipke BT, Allen PM. Essential role of neutrophils in the initiation and progression of a murine model of rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol. 2001;167:1601–1608. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.3.1601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Tanaka D, Kagari T, Doi H, Shimozato T. Essential role of neutrophils in anti-type II collagen antibody and lipopolysaccharide-induced arthritis. Immunology. 2006;119:195–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02424.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Eyles JL, Hickey MJ, Norman MU, Croker BA, Roberts AW, Drake SF, James WG, Metcalf D, Campbell IK, Wicks IP. A key role for G-CSF-induced neutrophil production and trafficking during inflammatory arthritis. Blood. 2008;112:5193–5201. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-139535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Odobasic D, Yang Y, Muljadi RC, O’Sullivan KM, Kao W, Smith M, Morand EF, Holdsworth SR. Endogenous myeloperoxidase is a mediator of joint inflammation and damage in experimental arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:907–917. doi: 10.1002/art.38299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Fernandes RM, da Silva NP, Sato EI. Increased myeloperoxidase plasma levels in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32:1605–1609. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-1810-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Stamp LK, Khalilova I, Tarr JM, Senthilmohan R, Turner R, Haigh RC, Winyard PG, Kettle AJ. Myeloperoxidase and oxidative stress in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51:1796–1803. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Nzeusseu Toukap A, Delporte C, Noyon C, Franck T, Rousseau A, Serteyn D, Raes M, Vanhaeverbeek M, Moguilevsky N, Neve J, Vanhamme L, Durez P, Van Antwerpen P, Zouaoui Boudjeltia K. Myeloperoxidase and its products in synovial fluid of patients with treated or untreated rheumatoid arthritis. Free Radic Res. 2014;48:461–465. doi: 10.3109/10715762.2014.886327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Lefkowitz DL, Gelderman MP, Fuhrmann SR, Graham S, Starnes JD, 3rd, Lefkowitz SS, Bollen A, Moguilevsky N. Neutrophilic myeloperoxidase-macrophage interactions perpetuate chronic inflammation associated with experimental arthritis. Clin Immunol. 1999;91:145–155. doi: 10.1006/clim.1999.4696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Barsante MM, Roffe E, Yokoro CM, Tafuri WL, Souza DG, Pinho V, Castro MS, Teixeira MM. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of atorvastatin in a rat model of adjuvant-induced arthritis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005;516:282–289. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Coelho FM, Pinho V, Amaral FA, Sachs D, Costa VV, Rodrigues DH, Vieira AT, Silva TA, Souza DG, Bertini R, Teixeira AL, Teixeira MM. The chemokine receptors CXCR1/CXCR2 modulate antigen-induced arthritis by regulating adhesion of neutrophils to the synovial microvasculature. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:2329–2337. doi: 10.1002/art.23622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Nylander A, Hafler DA. Multiple sclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:1180–1188. doi: 10.1172/JCI58649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Miller E. Multiple sclerosis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;724:222–238. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0653-2_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.McCarthy DP, Richards MH, Miller SD. Mouse models of multiple sclerosis: experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and Theiler’s virus-induced demyelinating disease. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;900:381–401. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-720-4_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.McColl SR, Staykova MA, Wozniak A, Fordham S, Bruce J, Willenborg DO. Treatment with anti-granulocyte antibodies inhibits the effector phase of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 1998;161:6421–6426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Carlson T, Kroenke M, Rao P, Lane TE, Segal B. The Th17-ELR+ CXC chemokine pathway is essential for the development of central nervous system autoimmune disease. J Exp Med. 2008;205:811–823. doi: 10.1084/jem.20072404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Steinbach K, Piedavent M, Bauer S, Neumann JT, Friese MA. Neutrophils amplify autoimmune central nervous system infiltrates by maturing local APCs. J Immunol. 2013;191:4531–4539. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Chataway J, Sawcer S, Feakes R, Coraddu F, Broadley S, Jones HB, Clayton D, Gray J, Goodfellow PN, Compston A. A screen of candidates from peaks of linkage: evidence for the involvement of myeloperoxidase in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 1999;98:208–213. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(99)00089-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kuokkanen S, Sundvall M, Terwilliger JD, Tienari PJ, Wikstrom J, Holmdahl R, Pettersson U, Peltonen L. A putative vulnerability locus to multiple sclerosis maps to 5p14-p12 in a region syntenic to the murine locus Eae2. Nat Genet. 1996;13:477–480. doi: 10.1038/ng0896-477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Kuokkanen S, Gschwend M, Rioux JD, Daly MJ, Terwilliger JD, Tienari PJ, Wikstrom J, Palo J, Stein LD, Hudson TJ, Lander ES, Peltonen L. Genomewide scan of multiple sclerosis in Finnish multiplex families. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;61:1379–1387. doi: 10.1086/301637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Zakrzewska-Pniewska B, Styczynska M, Podlecka A, Samocka R, Peplonska B, Barcikowska M, Kwiecinski H. Association of apolipoprotein E and myeloperoxidase genotypes to clinical course of familial and sporadic multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2004;10:266–271. doi: 10.1191/1352458504ms1015oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Kantarci OH, Atkinson EJ, Hebrink DD, McMurray CT, Weinshenker BG. Association of a myeloperoxidase promoter polymorphism with multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2000;105:189–194. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(00)00198-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Lundmark F, Salter H, Hillert J. An association study of two functional promotor polymorphisms in the myeloperoxidase (MPO) gene in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2007;13:697–700. doi: 10.1177/1352458506075315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Minohara M, Matsuoka T, Li W, Osoegawa M, Ishizu T, Ohyagi Y, Kira J. Upregulation of myeloperoxidase in patients with opticospinal multiple sclerosis: positive correlation with disease severity. J Neuroimmunol. 2006;178:156–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Gray E, Thomas TL, Betmouni S, Scolding N, Love S. Elevated activity and microglial expression of myeloperoxidase in demyelinated cerebral cortex in multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol. 2008;18:86–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00110.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Kutzelnigg A, Lucchinetti CF, Stadelmann C, Bruck W, Rauschka H, Bergmann M, Schmidbauer M, Parisi JE, Lassmann H. Cortical demyelination and diffuse white matter injury in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2005;128:2705–2712. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Gray E, Thomas TL, Betmouni S, Scolding N, Love S. Elevated myeloperoxidase activity in white matter in multiple sclerosis. Neurosci Lett. 2008;444:195–198. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.De Groot CJ, Bergers E, Kamphorst W, Ravid R, Polman CH, Barkhof F, van der Valk P. Post-mortem MRI-guided sampling of multiple sclerosis brain lesions: increased yield of active demyelinating and (p)reactive lesions. Brain. 2001;124:1635–1645. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.8.1635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Sicotte NL. Neuroimaging in multiple sclerosis: neurotherapeutic implications. Neurotherapeutics. 2011;8:54–62. doi: 10.1007/s13311-010-0008-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Filippi M, Rocca MA, Martino G, Horsfield MA, Comi G. Magnetization transfer changes in the normal appearing white matter precede the appearance of enhancing lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1998;43:809–814. doi: 10.1002/ana.410430616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Chen JW, Breckwoldt MO, Aikawa E, Chiang G, Weissleder R. Myeloperoxidase-targeted imaging of active inflammatory lesions in murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Brain. 2008;131:1123–1133. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Gross S, Gammon ST, Moss BL, Rauch D, Harding J, Heinecke JW, Ratner L, Piwnica-Worms D. Bioluminescence imaging of myeloperoxidase activity in vivo. Nat Med. 2009;15:455–461. doi: 10.1038/nm.1886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Forghani R, Wojtkiewicz GR, Zhang Y, Seeburg D, Bautz BR, Pulli B, Milewski AR, Atkinson WL, Iwamoto Y, Zhang ER, Etzrodt M, Rodriguez E, Robbins CS, Swirski FK, Weissleder R, Chen JW. Demyelinating diseases: myeloperoxidase as an imaging biomarker and therapeutic target. Radiology. 2012;263:451–460. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Pulli B, Bure L, Wojtkiewicz GR, Iwamoto Y, Ali M, Li D, Schob S, Li-Chun Hsieh K, Jacobs AH, Chen JW. Multiple sclerosis: myeloperoxidase immunoradiology improves detection of acute and chronic disease in experimental model. Radiology. 2014;141495 doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Miller NM, Wang J, Tan Y, Dittel BN. Anti-inflammatory mechanisms of IFN-gamma studied in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis reveal neutrophils as a potential target in multiple sclerosis. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:287. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Ziaber J, Pasnik J, Baj Z, Pokoca L, Chmielewski H, Tchorzewski H. The immunoregulatory abilities of polymorphonuclear neutrophils in the course of multiple sclerosis. Mediators Inflamm. 1998;7:335–338. doi: 10.1080/09629359890857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Naegele M, Tillack K, Reinhardt S, Schippling S, Martin R, Sospedra M. Neutrophils in multiple sclerosis are characterized by a primed phenotype. J Neuroimmunol. 2012;242:60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2011.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Demirci S, Demirci S, Kutluhan S, Koyuncuoglu HR, Yurekli VA. The clinical significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in multiple sclerosis. Int J Neurosci. 2015:1–24. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2015.1050492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Lund BT, Ashikian N, Ta HQ, Chakryan Y, Manoukian K, Groshen S, Gilmore W, Cheema GS, Stohl W, Burnett ME, Ko D, Kachuck NJ, Weiner LP. Increased CXCL8 (IL-8) expression in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2004;155:161–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Rumble JM, Huber AK, Krishnamoorthy G, Srinivasan A, Giles DA, Zhang X, Wang L, Segal BM. Neutrophil-related factors as biomarkers in EAE and MS. J Exp Med. 2015;212:23–35. doi: 10.1084/jem.20141015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Aube B, Levesque SA, Pare A, Chamma E, Kebir H, Gorina R, Lecuyer MA, Alvarez JI, De Koninck Y, Engelhardt B, Prat A, Cote D, Lacroix S. Neutrophils mediate blood-spinal cord barrier disruption in demyelinating neuroinflammatory diseases. J Immunol. 2014;193:2438–2454. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Christy AL, Walker ME, Hessner MJ, Brown MA. Mast cell activation and neutrophil recruitment promotes early and robust inflammation in the meninges in EAE. J Autoimmun. 2013;42:50–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2012.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Ullen A, Singewald E, Konya V, Fauler G, Reicher H, Nusshold C, Hammer A, Kratky D, Heinemann A, Holzer P, Malle E, Sattler W. Myeloperoxidase-derived oxidants induce blood-brain barrier dysfunction in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Zhang H, Jing X, Shi Y, Xu H, Du J, Guan T, Weihrauch D, Jones DW, Wang W, Gourlay D, Oldham KT, Hillery CA, Pritchard KA., Jr N-Acetyl lysyltyrosylcysteine amide inhibits myeloperoxidase, a novel tripeptide inhibitor. J Lipid Res. 2013;54:3016–3029. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M038273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Zhang H, Ray A, Miller NM, Hartwig D, Pritchard KA, Jr, Dittel BN. Inhibition of myeloperoxidase at the peak of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis restores blood-brain-barrier integrity and ameliorates disease severity. J Neurochem. 2015 doi: 10.1111/jnc.13426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]