Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Nov 1;7:14851. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14782-2

Chemical Stability of Graphene Coated Silver Substrates for Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering

Seiya Suzuki 1,✉, Masamichi Yoshimura 1
PMCID: PMC5665989  PMID: 29093553

Abstract

Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is a novel method to sense molecular and lattice vibrations at a high sensitivity. Although nanostructured silver surface provides intense SERS signals, the silver surface is unstable under acidic environment and heated environment. Graphene, a single atomic carbon layer, has a prominent stability for chemical agents, and its honeycomb lattice completely prevents the penetration of small molecules. Here, we fabricated a SERS substrate by combining nanostructured silver surface and single-crystal monolayer graphene (G-SERS), and focused on its chemical stability. The G-SERS substrate showed SERS even in concentrated hydrochloric acid (35–37%) and heated air up to 400 °C, which is hardly obtainable by normal silver SERS substrates. The chemically stable G-SERS substrate posesses a practical and feasible application, and its high chemical stability provides a new type of SERS technique such as molecular detections at high temperatures or in extreme acidic conditions.

Introduction

Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is a novel method to sense molecular and lattice vibrations1–3. The origin of the intense Raman signals in SERS is enhancement of local electromagnetic fields via the localized surface plasmon resonance effect4 in nanostructured metal surface or metal colloids. The main contribution of SERS enhancement is electromagnetic (EM) enhancement up to 1010 times5–7, and another minor contribution is chemical enhancement including the resonance Raman effect, the charge-transfer effect, and the adsorption effect8. Coinage metals such as silver, gold, and copper, are the most common elements for SERS due to its large SERS enhancement and well-known fabrication methods. Gold and copper have interband absorption in the visible wavelength range, which decreases the maximum SERS intensity9. On the other hand, interband absorption of silver is located in the ultraviolet wavelength range, which leads the largest SERS intensity for visible light among these metals9,10.

Despite the superior enhancement, silver is difficult to use in acid or heated environment with oxidative gas because of dissolution or oxidation of silver. Graphene, a single atomic carbon layer, has a prominent stability for chemical agents, and its honeycomb lattice completely prevents the penetration of small molecules like hydrogen and water11. Therefore, graphene can be useful for a prominent protecting layer of nanostructured silver surfaces for SERS. Besides, graphene has only 2.3% absorption from near infrared to visible range12, minimizing the loss of SERS signals from silver.

Composites of nanostructured silver and graphene for SERS have been widely reported using various types of graphene materials such as graphene oxide13,14, reduced graphene oxide15–17, mechanically exfoliated graphene from bulk graphite18,19, and graphene grown by chemical vapor deposition (CVD)19–22. Although there are a lot of works on SERS using graphene, there are no reports to focus on the effectiveness of graphene as a protective layer for the plasmonic metal surfaces. Here we studied the chemical stability of graphene in the SERS substrate, consisting of silver nanostructures and single-crystal monolayer graphene23,24. Since the SERS for physisorbed molecules on graphene/plasmonic metal has been referred to as graphene-mediated SERS (G-SERS)19, we call our developed SERS substrate G-SERS substrate. It is found that the G-SERS substrate showed SERS even in concentrated hydrochloric acid (35–37%) and in heated air up to 400 °C, which is unattainable by the bared silver SERS substrates. The enhancements of Raman signals were observed not only for the protective graphene but also rhodamine 6G (R6G) molecules adsorbed on the graphene, indicating G-SERS can be used for the molecular sensing. Unstable peaks due to nonuniform molecular adsorption, structural change of molecules induced by laser, and metal-molecular interaction are usually observed on the bared silver SERS substrate but G-SERS substrate does not show such behavior which enables us to measure stable and reliable Raman spectra. The high chemical stability of G-SERS can be utilized for new types of SERS techniques such as molecular detections at high temperatures or in extreme acidic conditions.

Results and Discussion

Figure 1A shows a schematic illustration of the G-SERS substrate. The structure of the G-SERS substrate can be described as graphene/Ag/SiO2/Si, where the graphene as a protective layer was prepared by CVD and transfer process, and the silver as plasmonic metal was deposited by sputtering. Figure 1B is an atomic force microscope (AFM) image of the as-deposited silver on a SiO2/Si. The sputtering resulted in the formation of nanoparticles with the average height of 6.4 ± 0.7 nm which is considered as the average diameter of the nanoparticles. Figure 1C is an optical microscope image of CVD graphenes on Cu after oxidation at ~200 °C for visualizing graphene. The hexagonal structure corresponds to a single crystal domain of graphene25,26, and the size of the domains was approximately 1 mm in diameter. The present CVD graphene is monolayer which is confirmed by Raman spectrum shown in Fig. 2A (discussed later). Figure 1D shows an AFM image of the G-SERS surface. Figure 1E shows AFM line profiles along the broken lines in Fig. 1B and D. In the AFM line profile of the G-SERS (Fig. 1E), we can see large protrusions (3~5 nm) and small protrusions (a few sub-nanometers), as are pointed by arrows. The small protrusions come from the web structure as seen in Fig. 1D, and would be wrinkles of the CVD graphene. The large protrusions are caused by underlying silver particles since the height has similar order to that of the Ag nanoparticles on SiO2 (Fig. 1E). The slight decrease of the protrusions in height and density were observed after transfer of graphene (Fig. 1E), indicating bridging of graphene on Ag nanoparticles and aggregation of Ag nanoparticles during the transfer process. Thus, the graphene has a wavy structure along with silver surface. In this configuration, the distance between graphene and silver becomes short, leading to strong enhancement for adsorbed molecules on the graphene27.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Structure and morphology. (A) Schematic illustration of the G-SERS. (B) AFM image of sputtered silver on SiO2/Si. The deposited thickness of silver (measured by quartz oscillator) was ~2 nm. (C) CVD graphene grown on Cu. (D) AFM image of the G-SERS surface. (E) AFM line profiles along the broken lines in (B) and (E).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Enhancement of Raman peaks by G-SERS substrate. (A) Raman spectra of Ag/SiO2/Si (black), graphene/SiO2/Si (blue), and graphene/Ag/SiO2/Si (red). The number located above each spectrum shows magnifications for the intensity scale. Schematic illustrations for each sample are also shown. (B) Optical microscope image (left) and G’ peak intensity map (right) of G-SERS. (C) Histogram of the observed enhancement factor of G’ peak intensity. (D) Raman spectra of R6G/G-SERS (black) and R6G/Ag/SiO2/Si (red).

Figure 2A shows Raman spectra of Ag/SiO2/Si (upper), graphene/SiO2/Si (middle), and G-SERS substrate (lower). To compare peak intensities, all spectra were taken at the same conditions (laser power: 24 μW, exposure time: 1s). The number located above each spectrum shows the magnification for the intensity scale. The spectrum of Ag/SiO2 shows various intense peaks indicating SERS, although these peaks are not reproducible in peak position, width, and intensity (Fig. S1). These non-reproducible peaks are due to carbonaceous impurities adsorbed on silver surface. The carbonaceous impurities initially come from gas molecules from the ambience where the sample was exposed (i.e. in the sputtering chamber28 and the Raman measurement chamber (air)). The structure of the adsorbed carbonaceous species can be changed by laser heating29,30, which is called photocarbonization19,29. The photocarbonization can be seen in Fig. 1SA, and possible peak origins in the Fig. 1SA are summarized in Table S1.

The Raman spectrum of the G-SERS shows G’, G, and negligible small D peaks at around 2680, 1590, and 1345 cm−1, respectively. The larger intensities of G’ than G, and small D peak (G/D peak intensity ratio is ~20, see Fig. S2 and Table S2) indicate a monolayer graphene with high crystallinity31–33. The G’ and G peaks are also observed in the graphene/SiO2 but the intensities are very low compared to the G-SERS substrate. Contrary to Ag/SiO2/Si, the spectrum of G-SERS shows steady peaks whereby more stable and reliable SERS can be achieved.

Figure 2B shows an optical microscope image (left) and the G’ peak intensity map (right) of G-SERS. There is a spatial variation in G’ peak intensity, probably due to the variation of microscopic surface structure as shown in the AFM image (Fig. 1D). Figure 2C is the histogram of the observed enhancement factor of G’ peak, which is extracted from the mapping data (Fig. 2B). The enhancement was observed over the entire surface of G-SERS, and the maximum and average enhancement factors were ~24.7 and 10.2 ± 0.6. Figure S6C shows the average Raman spectra of Ag/SiO2/Si, graphene/SiO2/Si, and G-SERS. The enhancement of the G’ peak was obviously observed in the average spectra, ensuring that SERS enhancement occurs on the entire surface of G-SERS. Figure 2D shows Raman spectra of R6G/G-SERS and R6G/Ag/SiO2 in air. The R6G specimen was prepared by dropping and drying 30 μl of R6G/DI solution (10 nM) on each substrate. Prominent Raman peaks of R6G at 1180, 1361, 1507, and 1647 cm−1 for R6G/Ag/SiO2 and 1195, 1361, 1506, and 1652 cm−1 for R6G/G-SERS are observed, in agreement with previous reports34–36. Slight peak shifts in the R6G peaks for the G-SERS substrate would be due to the different charge transfer effect between R6G and silver or graphene. The peaks located at 1584 and 2673 cm−1 are G and G’ peak, respectively. The other peaks in R6G/Ag/SiO2 cannot be assigned, but would be from carbonaceous impurities as mentioned above. In contrast, there are no additional peaks in G-SERS, indicating that G-SERS can be suitable for molecular sensing.

The enhancement mechanism for molecules on G-SERS has been already discussed in a previous work19. Xu et al. revealed that monolayer graphene shell on Au nanospherical dimer enhances the localized electromagnetic fields rather than decrease19. The enhancement mechanism would be same also in our G-SERS since the structure of G-SERS is basically same. The relatively small enhancement for R6G on the G-SERS would be due to structural change of Ag nanoparticles during the process of graphene transfer (Fig. 2B,D, and E).

To examine chemical stability, the G-SERS substrate was immersed in hydrochloric acid (HCl) with continuously taking Raman spectra. Figure 3A and B show the time-resolved surface-enhanced Raman spectra of Ag/SiO2/Si and G-SERS at 60s interval, respectively. The concentration of the HCl was 1 × 10−5 M. The SERS peaks in Ag/SiO2/Si were disappeared at 60s, but were recovered at 120 s, and then finally completely disappeared at 240s. To understand this behavior, the immersed Ag/SiO2/Si surface was observed by AFM, where the size of the silver nanoparticles became larger (Fig. S3C). The size change of the silver particles would be due to silver chloride formation by reaction between HCl and silver nanoparticles37, which can also be confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Fig. S4). The chemical reaction caused the variation in SERS intensities and finally lost enhancement ability of the silver nanoparticles. On the other hand, all SERS peaks in G-SERS were stable after immersing in HCl (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

In situ HCl test of G-SERS. Time-resolved surface-enhanced Raman spectra of (A) Ag/SiO2/Si and (B) G-SERS at 60 s interval in diluted HCl solution. The concentration of the HCl was 1 × 10−5 M. (C) Normalized intensities at 1600 cm−1 (blue) in (A) Ag/SiO2/Si and of G’ peak (red) in (B) G-SERS with respect to time after immersing in HCl.

Figure 3C shows normalized intensities at 1600 cm−1 in Ag/SiO2/Si and of G’ peak in G-SERS with respect to time after immersing in HCl. The intensity of G’ peak initially decreases by 40%, and then keep constant, while the peak intensity of 1600 cm−1 in Ag/SiO2/Si is completely disappeared. Since the average enhancement factor is ~10 (Fig. 2C), the G’ peak was still enhanced nevertheless the decrease by HCl. The decrease in G’ peak would be due to the change of doping level in graphene by HCl38. These results indicate that graphene in the G-SERS substrate works as a protective layer which prevents the chemical reaction between silver and HCl. It is also noted that the G-SERS substrate shows SERS after immersing in concentrated HCl (35~37%), indicating its high chemical stability.

To show a potential of G-SERS for practical applications, we focused on the chemical reaction which requires HCl. Normal Ag SERS substrate cannot be used in such chemical reactions, although monitoring chemical reaction is one of the SERS application39. As a demonstration for the G-SERS, we measured tertiary butyl chloride (TBC) which was synthesized by tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA) and HCl.

Figure S5 shows Raman spectra of TBA and TBC on G-SERS and SiO2/Si substrate. For TBA, a Raman peak at 749.7 cm−1 was observed, corresponding to C-C-O (C3C-O) symmetric stretching mode40 in the molecule. The peak intensity of C-C-O stretching was 2.4 times higher on G-SERS than that on SiO2/Si. For TBC, the peak position of C-C-O was shifted to 745.8 cm−1, which corresponds to C-Cl stretching mode41 in the molecule. The peak intensity of C-Cl stretching was 1.8 times higher on G-SERS than that on SiO2/Si. The observed enhancement factors are relatively small, which would be due to weak adsorption of TBA and TBC onto the graphene.

Since the peak shift from C-C-O to C-Cl stretching was clearly observed by G-SERS, G-SERS has enough potential to monitor such chemical reaction. For the practical application for monitoring chemical reactions by G-SERS, its enhancement ability has to be improved, for example, by designing the structure of nanoparticles39.

Subsequently, thermal durability of G-SERS was examined. Figure 4A and B show in situ Raman spectra of G-SERS and Ag/SiO2/Si at elevated temperatures in air, respectively. These spectra are taken under the same conditions (laser power: 24 μW, exposure time: 5s), and are shown on the same intensity scale. The G-SERS sample shows several large peaks around the G peak at lower than 250 °C (Fig. 4A). The peaks would be from residual polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) which was used as a supporting layer for the transfer process of graphene. These PMMA peaks were greatly enhanced at 100, 200, and 250 °C, and were disappeared at 300 °C. The disappearance of the peaks would be explained by the complete removal of PMMA residue by oxidation. In the case of Ag/SiO2/Si, the SERS was observed until 140 °C, and then disappeared at 160 °C. The temperature of 160 °C is much lower than that the SERS was disappeared in G-SERS. We measured Ag/SiO2/Si by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) before and after heating at 200 °C for 15 min (Table S5), and found that the silver was oxidized after the heating. Thus, heating around 200 °C causes oxidation of silver nanoparticles, resulting in the loss of SERS in Ag/SiO2/Si. In the G-SERS, graphene is valid as a protective layer for preventing oxidation of silver, resulting in SERS at high temperatures. In addition, G-SERS has uniform spatial distribution in SERS intensity for the mild temperature range (100–140 °C) as shown in Fig. S11, which is an advantage for SERS applications.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Thermal stability of G-SERS substrate. In situ Raman spectra of (A) G-SERS and (B) Ag/SiO2/Si for low temperature heating (<300 °C) in air. In situ Raman spectra of (C) G-SERS and (D) graphene/SiO2/Si for high temperature heating (>400 °C) in air.

To validate the protective function of graphene for long heating duration time, we measured Raman spectroscopy of benzoic acid (BA) dissolved in isopropyl alcohol (IPA) on Ag/SiO2/Si and G-SERS. To give clear difference for the long time stability in SERS, Ag/SiO2/Si and G-SERS were heated at 150 °C in air up to 63 hours (h).

Figure S8B shows the dependence of the peak intensity of BA at ~1000 cm−1 on heating duration time. The intensity of BA on Ag/SiO2/Si was drastically decreased in the first 1 h, and kept nearly constant until 30 h, and completely disappeared after 63 h. The intensity of BA on G-SERS was fluctuated for the first 2 h, and reached maximum at 30 h, and decreased to be nearly half of the initial count (~1000) but existing. To examine the reason of the intensity changes in Fig. S8B, we have performed XPS and AFM. XPS analysis revealed that oxidation of Ag particles nearly completed within 1 h, and it does not proceed significantly from 1 to 63 h (Fig. S8C) in Ag/SiO2/Si. AFM analysis revealed that the aggregation of Ag particles proceeds gradually by belonging the heating duration time. The speed of aggregation of Ag particles is slower in G-SERS than Ag/SiO2/Si (Fig. S9), which provides long time stability in SERS for G-SERS substrates.

Figure 4C and D show in situ Raman spectra of G-SERS for higher temperatures (>400 °C) and graphene/SiO2/Si at each temperature in air, respectively. In the G-SERS substrate (Fig. 4C), the D peak was appeared at 400 °C and the peak intensities of D, G, and G’ peaks were decreased at 450 °C, and eventually all peaks were disappeared at 500 °C, indicating the loss of graphene. In the graphene/SiO2/Si (Fig. 4D), G and G’ peaks were observed until 500 °C but disappeared at 600 °C. To understand the loss of graphene at lower temperature in G-SERS, we compared the G’ peak positions and temperature as shown in Fig. S7. The G’ peak positions were monotonically decreased both for G-SERS and graphene/SiO2/Si, while the G’ peaks in G-SERS show lower position at almost all temperature. The redshift of G’ peak indicates that graphene is stretched by heating42–44. The larger redshifts in G-SERS than graphene/SiO2/Si indicate that the graphene in G-SERS is initially stretched by following the structure of Ag particles (Fig. 1D). Since the stretched graphene is more reactive for oxygen radicals than the flat graphene45, the initial stretch would result in loss of graphene at lower temperatures. It is also noted that the G’ peak at 400 °C in G-SERS (Fig. 4C) has ~2.8 times larger peak intensity than that in normal graphene, indicating that the enhancement still occurs at 400 °C. This result shows that the present G-SERS substrate can be useful for high temperature SERS applications.

Conclusions

In conclusion, a chemically stable G-SERS substrate was successfully fabricated by using single crystal monolayer CVD graphene. We revealed that the G-SERS substrate has high tolerance with HCl and high temperature oxidation up to 400 °C. The maximum and average observed enhancement factors of G’ peaks were ~24.7 and 10.2 ± 0.6, and the enhancement was observed over the entire surface. The enhancement factor can be further increased by adjusting the preparation process of silver nanoparticles. The fabrication method of the G-SERS substrate including CVD graphene is a scalable process. Thus, the chemically stable G-SERS substrate has a practical and feasible application and its high chemical stability can provide new type of SERS technique such as molecular detections at high temperatures or in extreme acidic conditions.

Methods

Silver nanoparticles were deposited by dc magnetron sputtering (Quorum Technologies, Q300T D) at room temperature with a silver target of 99.99% purity in argon atmosphere. The deposition pressure and rate were 1 Pa and ~1.3 Å/s. The deposited thickness (assuming uniform film structure) was measured by a quartz oscillator in the sputtering chamber to control the particle size of silver. The deposited thickness was used to control the particles size. The deposited thickness of silver ranging from 2 to 6 nm shows similar order enhancements in Raman signals for 532 nm wavelength.

Graphene was grown by a custom-made atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition (CVD) system23,24. The purities of H2 and Ar gasses are 99.99999% (7N), and 99.9999% (6N), respectively. The chamber pressure has been kept to be near atmospheric pressure (0.123~0.128 MPa) during the CVD process. 100 μm-thick commercial Cu foils (Nilaco, #113321) with the size of ~2 cm × 10 cm were used as catalytic substrates for the growth. The grown graphene was transferred onto arbitral target substrate with a conventional method, which uses a spin-coated polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) support layer, ammonium peroxodisulfate for etchant of Cu, and the mixture of acetone, isopropyl alcohol, and methyl isobutyl ketone for removal of PMMA46,47.

Surface morphologies of samples were microscopically observed using an atomic force microscope (AFM, Bruker, Multimode) in the peak force tapping mode and an optical microscope (Keyence, Digital Microscope VHX-5000). Surface elemental analyses were performed by XPS (ULVAC-PHI, PHI 5000 VersaProbe II) under a base pressure of ~6 × 10−8 Pa and a monochromatized AlKα (1486.6 eV) X-ray source. Raman spectra were recorded with a Raman microscope (Renishaw, InVia) at a wavelength of 532 nm in the backscattering geometry. In situ heating experiments were carried out in the temperature controllable stage (Linkam, THMS 600).

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information (1.4MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientist (Start-up) (No. 15H06723), and Strategic Research Foundation Grant-aided Project for Private Universities from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science, and Technology, Japan (MEXT).

Author Contributions

S.S. designed and performed experiments and wrote the manuscript. S.S. complied and analyzed all the results with due discussion with M.Y.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-017-14782-2.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Fleischmann M, Hendra PJ, McQuillan AJ. Raman spectra of pyridine adsorbed at a silver electrode. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1974;26:163–166. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(74)85388-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jeanmaire DL, Van Duyne RP. Surface Raman spectroelectrochemistry: Part I. Heterocyclic, aromatic, and aliphatic amines adsorbed on the anodized silver electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1977;84:1–20. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(77)80224-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Albrecht MG, Creighton JA. Anomalously Intense Raman-Spectra of Pyridine at a Silver Electrode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977;99:5215–5217. doi: 10.1021/ja00457a071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moskovits M. Surface roughness and the enhanced intensity of Raman scattering by molecules adsorbed on metals. J. Chem. Phys. 1978;69:4159–4161. doi: 10.1063/1.437095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Johansson P, Xu HX, Kall M. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering and fluorescence near metal nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B. 2005;72:035427. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.035427. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Inoue M, Ohtaka K. Surface enhanced Raman scattering by metal spheres. I. Cluster effect. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1983;52:3853–3864. doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.52.3853. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yamamoto YS, Itoh T. Why and how do the shapes of surface‐enhanced Raman scattering spectra change? Recent progress from mechanistic studies. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2016;47:78–88. doi: 10.1002/jrs.4874. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jensen L, Aikens CM, Schatz GC. Electronic structure methods for studying surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008;37:1061–1073. doi: 10.1039/b706023h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.West PR, et al. Searching for better plasmonic materials. Laser Photon. Rev. 2010;4:795–808. doi: 10.1002/lpor.200900055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.See KC, Spicer JB, Brupbacher J, Zhang D, Vargo TG. Modeling Interband Transitions in Silver Nanoparticle− Fluoropolymer Composites. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005;109:2693–2698. doi: 10.1021/jp046687h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.O’Hern SC, et al. Selective ionic transport through tunable subnanometer pores in single-layer graphene membranes. Nano Lett. 2014;14:1234–1241. doi: 10.1021/nl404118f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nair RR, et al. Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science. 2008;320:1308–1308. doi: 10.1126/science.1156965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xu C, Wang X. Fabrication of Flexible Metal‐Nanoparticle Films Using Graphene Oxide Sheets as Substrates. Small. 2009;5:2212–2217. doi: 10.1002/smll.200900548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang Z, et al. A facile one-pot method to high-quality Ag-graphene composite nanosheets for efficient surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:6440–6442. doi: 10.1039/c1cc11125f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sun S, Wu P. Competitive surface-enhanced Raman scattering effects in noble metal nanoparticle-decorated graphene sheets. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011;13:21116–21120. doi: 10.1039/c1cp22727k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lu G, et al. Surface enhanced Raman scattering of Ag or Au nanoparticle-decorated reduced graphene oxide for detection of aromatic molecules. Chem. Sci. 2011;2:1817–1821. doi: 10.1039/c1sc00254f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ouyang Y, Chen L. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering studies of few-layer graphene on silver substrate with 514 nm excitation. J. Mol. Struct. 2011;992:48–51. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2011.02.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee J, Novoselov KS, Shin HS. Interaction between metal and graphene: dependence on the layer number of graphene. ACS Nano. 2010;5:608–612. doi: 10.1021/nn103004c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xu W, et al. Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy on a flat graphene surface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:9281–9286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205478109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu C-Y, et al. Plasmonic coupling of silver nanoparticles covered by hydrogen-terminated graphene for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Opt. Express. 2011;19:17092–17098. doi: 10.1364/OE.19.017092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dai Z, et al. Monolayer graphene on nanostructured Ag for enhancement of surface-enhanced Raman scattering stable platform. Nanotechnology. 2015;26:125603. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/12/125603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dai Z-G, et al. Plasmon-driven reaction controlled by the number of graphene layers and localized surface plasmon distribution during optical excitation. Light: Science and Applications. 2015;4:e342. doi: 10.1038/lsa.2015.115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Suzuki S, Kiyosumi K, Nagamori T, Tanaka K, Yoshimura M. Low Density Growth of Graphene by Air Introduction in Atmospheric PressureChemical Vapor Deposition. e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol. 2015;13:404–409. doi: 10.1380/ejssnt.2015.404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Suzuki S, Nagamori T, Matsuoka Y, Yoshimura M. Threefold atmospheric-pressure annealing for suppressing graphene nucleation on copper in chemical vapor deposition. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2014;53:095101. doi: 10.7567/JJAP.53.095101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vlassiouk I, et al. Role of hydrogen in chemical vapor deposition growth of large single-crystal graphene. ACS Nano. 2011;5:6069–6076. doi: 10.1021/nn201978y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yan Z, et al. Toward the synthesis of wafer-scale single-crystal graphene on copper foils. ACS Nano. 2012;6:9110–9117. doi: 10.1021/nn303352k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xu W, et al. Graphene‐Veiled Gold Substrate for Surface‐Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Adv. Mater. 2013;25:928–933. doi: 10.1002/adma.201204355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Büchel D, et al. Sputtered silver oxide layers for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001;79:620–622. doi: 10.1063/1.1389513. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang N, Tong L, Zhang J. Graphene-based enhanced Raman scattering toward analytical applications. Chem. Mater. 2016;28:6426–6435. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02925. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cooney RP, Mahoney MR, Howard MW. Intense Raman spectra of surface carbon and hydrocarbons on silver electrodes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1980;76:448–452. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(80)80645-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Malard L, Pimenta M, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus M. Raman spectroscopy in graphene. Phys. Rep. 2009;473:51–87. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ferrari AC, Robertson J. Raman spectroscopy of amorphous, nanostructured, diamond-like carbon, and nanodiamond. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 2004;362:2477–2512. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2004.1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ferrari A, et al. Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;97:187401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nie S, Emory SR. Probing Single Molecules and Single Nanoparticles by Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Science. 1997;275:1102–1106. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5303.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Michaels AM, Nirmal M, Brus L. Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy of individual rhodamine 6G molecules on large Ag nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:9932–9939. doi: 10.1021/ja992128q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dieringer JA, et al. Surface-enhanced Raman excitation spectroscopy of a single rhodamine 6G molecule. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:849–854. doi: 10.1021/ja8080154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li L, Zhu Y-J. High chemical reactivity of silver nanoparticles toward hydrochloric acid. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;303:415–418. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.07.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Das A, et al. Monitoring dopants by Raman scattering in an electrochemically top-gated graphene transistor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008;3:210–215. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Xie W, Walkenfort B, Schlücker S. Label-free SERS monitoring of chemical reactions catalyzed by small gold nanoparticles using 3D plasmonic superstructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;135:1657–1660. doi: 10.1021/ja309074a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kipkemboi, P. K., Kiprono, P. C. & Sanga, J. J. Vibrational spectra of t-butyl alcohol, t-butylamine and t-butyl alcohol+ t-butylamine binary liquid mixtures. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 17 (2003).
  • 41.Lin-Vien, D., Colthup, N. B., Fateley, W. G. & Grasselli, J. G. The handbook of infrared and Raman characteristic frequencies of organic molecules. (Elsevier, 1991).
  • 42.Wang W, Peng Q, Dai Y, Qian Z, Liu S. Temperature dependence of Raman spectra of graphene on copper foil substrate. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2016;27:3888–3893. doi: 10.1007/s10854-015-4238-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Calizo I, Balandin A, Bao W, Miao F, Lau C. Temperature dependence of the Raman spectra of graphene and graphene multilayers. Nano Lett. 2007;7:2645–2649. doi: 10.1021/nl071033g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mohiuddin T, et al. Uniaxial strain in graphene by Raman spectroscopy: G peak splitting, Grüneisen parameters, and sample orientation. Phys. Rev. B. 2009;79:205433. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.205433. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tao HH, Moser J, Alzina F, Wang Q, Sotomayor-Torres CM. The Morphology of Graphene Sheets Treated in an Ozone Generator. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2011;115:18257–18260. doi: 10.1021/jp2050756. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Reina A, et al. Large area, few-layer graphene films on arbitrary substrates by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Lett. 2009;9:30–35. doi: 10.1021/nl801827v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jeong HJ, et al. Improved transfer of chemical-vapor-deposited graphene through modification of intermolecular interactions and solubility of poly (methylmethacrylate) layers. Carbon. 2014;66:612–618. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (1.4MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES