Abstract
One of the most common urologic problems afflicting millions of people worldwide is urinary tract infection (UTI). The severity of UTIs ranges from asymptomatic bacteriuria to acute cystitis, and in severe cases, pyelonephritis and urosepsis. The primary cause of UTIs is uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC), for which current antibiotic therapies often fail. UPEC forms multicellular communities known as biofilms on urinary catheters, as well as on and within bladder epithelial cells. Biofilm formation protects UPEC from environmental conditions, antimicrobial therapy, and the host immune system. Previous studies have investigated UPEC biofilm formation in aerobic conditions (21% oxygen); however, urine oxygen tension is reduced (4–6%), and urine contains molecules that can be used by UPEC as alternative terminal electron acceptors (ATEAs) for respiration. This study was designed to determine whether these different terminal electron acceptors utilized by E. coli influence biofilm formation. A panel of 50 urine-associated E. coli isolates was tested for the ability to form biofilm under anaerobic conditions and in the presence of ATEAs. Biofilm production was reduced under all tested sub-atmospheric levels of oxygen, with the notable exception of 4% oxygen, the reported concentration of oxygen within the bladder.
Keywords: bacterial biofilms, E. coli respiration, terminal electron acceptor, urinary tract infection, uropathogenic E. coli
1. Introduction
1.1. Urinary Tract Infection in the Context of Benign Urologic Disease
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) account for 20 million hospital or clinic visits and billions of dollars in healthcare expenditures annually in the United States and Europe [1,2,3,4]. The most common type of UTI is acute cystitis, which is characterized by urinary urgency, frequency, dysuria, and pyuria [4,5]. UTIs primarily afflict women, with one in two experiencing at least one UTI episode in her lifetime [4]. Approximately 30% of women with a UTI will have recurrent infection [4,6]. Men are less susceptible to UTIs than women, but their risk of infection increases with age. Furthermore, infected men are more likely to experience more severe forms of infection, such as pyelonephritis and urosepsis [7,8]. UTIs are a common complication among hospitalized patients, particularly among the elderly and patients with diabetes, bladder cancer, or indwelling catheters [9,10]. Current therapy for UTIs often fails, and this is exacerbated by the increased incidence of UTIs caused by bacteria resistant to common antimicrobials [11,12].
1.2. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Biofilm Formation
Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the most common cause of UTI, accounting for approximately 80% of infections [2]. UPEC readily forms multi-cellular communities known as biofilms on the surface of catheter materials, bladder walls, as well as within bladder epithelial cells [13,14,15,16]. The formation of biofilms markedly impedes the treatment of UTIs by protecting encased bacteria from both the host immune response and antimicrobial therapy. Bacteria are in close proximity within the biofilm, facilitating the exchange of genetic material, such as antimicrobial resistance plasmids and transposons [17,18]. Understanding the host factors that facilitate biofilm formation during UTIs will enhance the development of better strategies for combatting biofilms and treating infections.
To form a biofilm, bacteria must first attach to a surface. Adherence of UPEC strains can be influenced by a wide variety of intrinsic factors, such as adhesive proteins, fibers, and exopolysaccharide molecules; the carriage and expression of such factors differs from strain to strain [19,20,21,22,23,24]. Once attached to the surface bacteria change from a planktonic form to a sessile form, which replicate while producing extracellular matrix (ECM). This ECM encases the bacteria in a micro-colony. The ECM can be made up of one or more components including exopolysaccharides, proteinaceous material, and extracellular DNA [17,25,26,27,28]. As the biofilm colony grows and matures, bacteria within the ECM respond to signals from their surrounding environment, eventually leading to a portion of the encased bacteria dispersing from the biofilm colony [19,29,30]. The dispersed bacteria can return to the planktonic form or continue the process of biofilm formation elsewhere. Alternatively, the bacteria can form quiescent reservoirs in the urothelium which are thought to contribute to recurrent infection [31,32,33].
UPEC is a facultative anaerobe with significant metabolic versatility. Despite this, previous work has shown that deletion of genes encoding the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle enzymes attenuates UPEC infection in a well-characterized murine model [34,35,36]. The TCA cycle generates molecules, such as NADH and FADH, that can be utilized in the electron transport chain if oxygen or one of five alternative terminal electron acceptors (ATEAs) is available (Figure 1 and [37,38]). In addition, our group has demonstrated that UPEC mutants unable to use oxygen as the terminal electron acceptor are also attenuated for virulence [39]. Together, these findings suggest that UPEC isolates use aerobic respiration during UTIs.
In this study, we sought to evaluate the amount of biofilm produced when wild UPEC strains are grown in anaerobic conditions in the presence of ATEAs. We demonstrate that UPEC biofilm formation is decreased under anoxic conditions compared to atmospheric conditions in 50 urine-associated E. coli clinical isolates. Furthermore, addition of ATEAs to the growth medium did not restore biofilm formation for any of the strains tested. Evaluating biofilm formation in decreasing concentrations of oxygen revealed that only hypoxic conditions that mimic the oxygen concentration of the bladder (4–5.5% oxygen; [40]) led to robust biofilm formation.
2. Results
2.1. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) Biofilm Formation Is Diminished under Anoxic Conditions
One of the most critical adherence factors identified in UPEC is a class of fibers termed type 1 pili [41]. Type 1 pili mediate UPEC adhesion to bladder epithelial cells, and their deletion greatly diminishes biofilm formation under laboratory and in vivo conditions [42]. We have previously shown that in the complete absence of oxygen, expression of type 1 pili is reduced in cystitis strain UTI89 [43]; mutants unable to aerobically respire also display a defect in type 1 pili production and biofilm formation [39]. These observations have led to the hypothesis that anoxic conditions reduce biofilm formation due to the reduction of type 1 pili. We, therefore, compared in vitro biofilm formation at atmospheric (21% oxygen) and anoxic conditions (0% oxygen) for a panel of urine-associated E. coli isolates obtained from the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) clinical microbiology laboratory (IRB #151465). Even though the assay has not been done on bladder tissue, numerous studies have used this method for evaluating biofilm formation in vitro [39,44] As expected, cystitis isolate UTI89 exhibited decreased biofilm formation under anoxic conditions (Figure S1A), presumably due to reduced expression of these adhesive fibers [43]. This reduction in biofilm formation did not appear to be a function of reduced bacterial cell viability (Figure S1B,C and Table S1). We then quantified the biofilm levels formed by 50 urine-associated E. coli strains during growth in 21% versus 0% oxygen conditions in vitro (Figure 2). Biofilm levels varied among the urine-associated E. coli isolates, with Vanderbilt Urinary Tract Isolate 41 (VUTI41) forming the highest levels of biofilm (Figure 2 and Table S2). A subset of VUTIs was grown under atmospheric oxygen conditions and exhibited growth comparable to UTI89 (Figure S2). Interestingly, VUTIs also expressed variable levels of type 1 pili (as indicated by the abundance of the main pilin subunit FimA (Immunoblots, Figure 3a), but this expression did not correspond to levels of biofilm formation (Figure 3a). The E. coli matrix typically comprises curli, cellulose, colonic acid, and other adhesive moieties, depending on the strain background. To gain an appreciation in the variation of curli and cellulose produced by the 50 VUTIs, the strains were spotted on yeast extract/casamino acid (YESCA) agar supplemented with Congo Red. Congo Red uptake (indicative of cellulose and curli production) was also variable in the VUTIIs, (Figure 3b), indicating high variability in the matrix composition and possibly architecture among different isolates. Irrespective of type 1 pili expression and curli/cellulose production, 48/50 urine-associated E. coli isolates formed less biofilm under anaerobic conditions (Figure 2), suggesting that oxygen regulates additional biofilm factors other than type 1 pili. To more closely mimic the bladder environment, a subset of urine-associated E. coli isolates was tested for in vitro biofilm levels when grown in artificial urine. The biofilm levels formed by these strains in artificial urine was higher overall by crystal violet staining compared to the levels of biofilm formed when grown in LB, but greatly diminished in the absence of oxygen (Figure S3).
2.2. Biofilm Formation in UPEC Is Not Restored in the Presence of ATEAs
E. coli can use different (i.e., alternative) terminal electron acceptors when oxygen is unavailable (Figure 1). Depending on a person’s diet, urine can be rich in trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) [46] and nitrate [47]. Moreover, high levels of nitrite are suggestive of a UTI, as members of the Enterobacteriaceae will reduce nitrate to nitrite [47]. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) has been used for the intravesical treatment of cystitis [48,49]. It is, therefore, possible that biofilm formation may be restored under anaerobic conditions provided an ATEA is present. Our previous work has demonstrated that the addition of nitrate partially restored type 1 pili expression under anaerobic conditions [43]. We, therefore, tested biofilm formation under anaerobic conditions using 40 mM of an ATEA (Figure 4 and Figure S4). Under these conditions, cystitis strain UTI89 did not form an appreciable biofilm (Figure 4a). The presence of an ATEA also failed to restore the biofilm formation in ten randomly-selected urine-associated E. coli isolates (Figure 4b,c), indicating that our observations were not strain-specific.
2.3. Oxygen Concentrations That Mimic the Bladder Support Robust Biofilm Formation
The urinary oxygen tension ranges from 4–5.5% in the bladder of healthy individuals [40]. In the gut, oxygen concentration ranges from 8% oxygen in the upper GI tract to 0% in the sigmoid colon [50]. We, therefore, quantified biofilm formation at oxygen concentrations that are likely to be encountered by E. coli in the host. These experiments revealed that biofilm formation decreased in a step-wise fashion from 21% to 10% oxygen (Figure 5). However, biofilm levels fluctuated in a cyclical fashion as oxygen decreased from 8% to 2% oxygen, with biofilm levels at 4% oxygen reaching those obtained during growth under atmospheric oxygen conditions (Figure 5).
3. Discussion
In this investigation, we have demonstrated that oxygen is the terminal electron acceptor that supports the most robust biofilm production by UPEC. Though biofilm production under ambient oxygen conditions varied among isolates (Figure 2), the decrease in biofilm abundance in the absence of oxygen was consistent in 96% of all urine-associated E. coli tested, suggesting that the requirement for oxygen is a broad phenomenon. Notably, of the 50 clinical E. coli isolates tested, VUTI39 and VUTI61 formed low levels of biofilm that did not change in response to the presence or absence of oxygen. It is important to note that there are few studies that indicate whether higher levels of biofilm production correlate with more virulent E. coli strains, or E. coli strains that cause catheter-associated UTIs [51]. However, the observation that oxygen enhances the production of biofilm suggests that UPEC are exposed to ideal conditions for biofilm formation in the bladder. Furthermore, biofilm formation by UPEC exhibits a cyclical pattern from 10% to 0% oxygen. Ongoing studies are investigating if cytochrome bd and/or bd2 oxidase are contributing to the biofilm levels under different levels of hypoxia.
Under ambient oxygen concentrations, we have observed a wide variability in biofilm production by urine-associated E. coli strains (Figure 2). Colorimetric assays, such as the one used in our studies, serve as an indicator of biofilm production [52]. Biofilm production can vary as a function of bacterial numbers within the biofilm colony, as well as the amount and type of ECM produced by a given strain. For example, the high biofilm levels of strain VUTI41 could be due to higher numbers of bacterial cells within the biofilm and/or due to higher levels of ECM produced by that particular strain.
Adherence is a critical step that is required for biofilm formation by E. coli. Adherence to a surface can vary as a function of the expression, abundance, and type of adhesive fibers expressed by each E. coli strain. Type 1 pili appear to mediate surface attachment and, thus, contribute significantly to UTIs caused by UPEC [41]. We have previously reported that type 1 pili expression is decreased during UPEC growth in the absence of oxygen, and that type 1 pili are localized to the air-exposed region of biofilms formed by strain UTI89 in ambient oxygen conditions [43]. Though the majority of E. coli strains harbor the genes encoding for type 1 pili, not all urine-associated E. coli isolates expressed type 1 pili under the conditions tested. Of the 50 isolates tested, only 27 isolates express FimA under the growth conditions tested (Figure 3a). Notably, there is variation in the FimA-reactive bands in the immunoblots, indicative of the presence of different FimA isoforms, as in the case of UPEC strain CFT073 FimA (Figure S5 and [22,53]). It is, however, also possible, and we acknowledge, that there could be cross-interaction with a pilus subunit from another chaperone-usher pathway system. Most notably, there was no correlation between type 1 pili expression and biofilm abundance, as exemplified by VUTI41, which formed the most biofilm but did not produce type 1 pili (Figure 2 and Figure 3a). This strongly suggests that type 1 pili are only partially responsible for the loss of biofilm production in the absence of oxygen. Previous studies have established that the regulation of adhesive fibers is inter-connected [36,54]. It is possible that the urine-associated E. coli strains that do not express type 1 pili possess other functional adhesins on their cell surfaces that allow adherence. Interestingly, based on the congo-red profiles, it appears that curli and cellulose levels also vary among the clinical isolates tested (Figure 3b). VUTI41 does not uptake Congo red, suggesting that its high levels of biofilm are not attributed to type 1 pili, cellulose, or curli. Ongoing studies are aimed at determining the oxygen-mediated regulators of biofilm production in UPEC.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Bacterial Strains
Cystitis isolate UTI89 [33] and previously-constructed mutant UTI89∆fimA-H (a gift from Scott Hultgren) were used as reference strains. Urine-associated E. coli strains VUTI1–VUTI112 (VUTI, Vanderbilt Urinary Tract Isolate) were isolated from positive-culture urines (mono-species culture) by the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) clinical microbiology laboratory (Nashville, Tennessee), under IRB #151465. Of the collected isolates, 50 strains were randomly selected for the biofilm studies presented in this manuscript.
4.2. Biofilm Assays
All strains were grown statically overnight at 37 °C in lysogeny broth (LB). Cultures were then diluted to an OD600 of 0.06 in fresh LB or artificial urine and seeded into 96-well polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plates as previously described [39]. Artificial urine recipe can be found in the supplementary material. Plates were incubated statically at room temperature as previously described [39], but with varying oxygen concentrations: (a) aerobic (ambient/21%); (b) hypoxic gradient; or (c) anoxic (0% oxygen) conditions. Biofilm plates grown under anoxic conditions were incubated in a vinyl anaerobic chamber (Coy Lab Products, Grass Lake, MI, USA) maintained at 0% oxygen and 2–3% hydrogen. Hypoxic oxygen concentrations were achieved in a Herthem incubator (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a ProOx 110 compact oxygen controller (BioSpherix, Parish, NY, USA) that displaces oxygen with nitrogen gas. All biofilm plates were incubated for 48 h at room temperature prior to quantitation. Biofilm abundance was quantified using the crystal violet staining method of O’Toole et al. [52]. For the ATEA biofilm experiments, the following procedure was performed in addition to what is described above: A 3.2 M stock concentration of nitrate, DMSO, or TMAO was diluted with sterile water to the desired final concentration in each well (ranging from 160 to 20 mM) so that the final liquid volume in each well was equal. Fumarate was diluted in LB to a stock concentration of 160 mM and further diluted in fresh LB to achieve the desired final concentrations. Each study was performed at least three independent times, with at least 24 technical replicates per biological replicate. Congo red uptake was qualitatively assessed by spotting 5 μL of overnight culture on 1.2× yeast extract/casamino acid (YESCA) Congo red agar plates and monitoring for Congo red uptake and rugose morphology, as previously described [55,56]. Plates were incubated at room temperature and imaged on day 7. At least two independent experiments were performed.
4.3. Growth Curves and CFU Enumeration
Bacterial cultures were grown in LB overnight shaking at 37 °C. Overnight cultures were diluted to an OD600 of 0.06 in fresh LB. 100 μL of diluted culture was added to each well in a flat-bottom 96-well plate. Absorbance measurements at an optical density at 600 nm were recorded at 15-min intervals for 24 h. Growth curves under ambient oxygen conditions were performed using a SpectraMax i3 (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) plate reader, while measurements under anoxic conditions were performed using a Synery H1 hybrid reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). In addition to absorbance readings, samples were collected at 60-min intervals for CFU enumeration. Obtained samples were serially diluted and plated on LB plates (8–10 technical replicates per sample) for enumeration. Experiments were performed independently at least two times.
4.4. Immunoblot Analyses
All strains were grown statically overnight at 37 °C. Culture was normalized to an OD600 of 1 and then FimA immunoblots were performed as detailed in Floyd et al. [43].
5. Conclusions
This study demonstrates that oxygen is a major driver of biofilm formation across a range of UPEC isolates. Most importantly, the highest biofilm abundance is observed at ambient and at 4% oxygen concentrations. Further research is aimed at pinpointing the factors and regulatory processes that enhance biofilm formation at 4% oxygen compared to other hypoxic conditions.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the members of the Hadjifrangiskou laboratory for their critical review of the manuscript. We greatly appreciate the generosity of the Skaar and Cassat laboratories for allowing us to use the anaerobic chamber and hypoxic chamber, respectively. Financial support for this work provided by the NIDDK Diabetic Complications Consortium (DiaComp, www.diacomp.org), grant DK076169.
Abbreviations
UTI | Urinary tract infection |
UPEC | Uropathogenic E. coli |
ATEA | Alternative terminal electron acceptor |
ASB | Asymptomatic bacteriuria |
CAUTI | Catheter-associated UTI |
ECM | Extracellular matrix |
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary materials can be found at www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/18/10/2077/s1.
Author Contributions
Allison R. Eberly, Kyle A. Floyd, and Maria Hadjifrangiskou conceived and designed the experiments. Allison R. Eberly, Kyle A. Floyd, Connor J. Beebout, Spencer J. Colling, and Madison J. Fitzgerald performed the experiments. Jonathan E. Schmitz and Charles W. Stratton acquired and provided clinical isolates and technical advice. Allison R. Eberly, Connor J. Beebout, Kyle A. Floyd, and Maria Hadjifrangiskou analyzed the data. Allison R. Eberly and Maria Hadjifrangiskou wrote and edited the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Foxman B., Barlow R., D’Arcy H., Gillespie B., Sobel J.D. Urinary tract infection: Self-reported incidence and associated costs. Ann. Epidemiol. 2000;10:509–515. doi: 10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00072-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kennedy E.H., Greene M.T., Saint S. Estimating hospital costs of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. J. Hosp. Med. 2013;8:519–522. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schappert S.M., Rechtsteiner E.A. Ambulatory medical care utilization estimates for 2007. Vital Health Stat. 2011;169:1–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Foxman B. Urinary tract infection syndromes: Occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2014;28:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2013.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Al-Badr A., Al-Shaikh G. Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections Management in Women: A review. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J. 2013;13:359–367. doi: 10.12816/0003256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Foxman B. The epidemiology of urinary tract infection. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2010;7:653–660. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McLellan L.K., Hunstad D.A. Urinary Tract Infection: Pathogenesis and Outlook. Trends Mol. Med. 2016;22:946–957. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2016.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Foxman B., Klemstine K.L., Brown P.D. Acute pyelonephritis in US hospitals in 1997: Hospitalization and in-hospital mortality. Ann. Epidemiol. 2003;13:144–150. doi: 10.1016/S1047-2797(02)00272-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rowe T.A., Juthani-Mehta M. Urinary tract infection in older adults. Aging Health. 2013;9:519–528. doi: 10.2217/ahe.13.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Finnell S.M., Carroll A.E., Downs S.M., Infection SoUT Technical report—Diagnosis and management of an initial UTI in febrile infants and young children. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e749–e770. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mediavilla J.R., Patrawalla A., Chen L., Chavda K.D., Mathema B., Vinnard C., Dever L.L., Kreiswirth B.N. Colistin- and Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli Harboring mcr-1 and blaNDM-5, Causing a Complicated Urinary Tract Infection in a Patient from the United States. MBio. 2016;7:e01191-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01191-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zowawi H.M., Harris P.N., Roberts M.J., Tambyah P.A., Schembri M.A., Pezzani M.D., Williamson D.A., Paterson D.L. The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2015;12:570–584. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Anderson G.G., Palermo J.J., Schilling J.D., Roth R., Heuser J., Hultgren S.J. Intracellular bacterial biofilm-like pods in urinary tract infections. Science. 2003;301:105–107. doi: 10.1126/science.1084550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rosen D.A., Hooton T.M., Stamm W.E., Humphrey P.A., Hultgren S.J. Detection of intracellular bacterial communities in human urinary tract infection. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rosen D.A., Pinkner J.S., Jones J.M., Walker J.N., Clegg S., Hultgren S.J. Utilization of an intracellular bacterial community pathway in Klebsiella pneumoniae urinary tract infection and the effects of FimK on type 1 pilus expression. Infect. Immun. 2008;76:3337–3345. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00090-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schaffer J.N., Norsworthy A.N., Sun T.T., Pearson M.M. Proteus mirabilis fimbriae- and urease-dependent clusters assemble in an extracellular niche to initiate bladder stone formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:4494–4499. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601720113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Flemming H.C., Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010;8:623–633. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Aminov R.I. Horizontal gene exchange in environmental microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2011;2:158. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kostakioti M., Hadjifrangiskou M., Hultgren S.J. Bacterial biofilms: Development, dispersal, and therapeutic strategies in the dawn of the postantibiotic era. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2013;3:a010306. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a010306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lewis K. Persister cells and the riddle of biofilm survival. Biochemistry. 2005;70:267–274. doi: 10.1007/s10541-005-0111-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chen S.L., Wu M., Henderson J.P., Hooton T.M., Hibbing M.E., Hultgren S.J., Gordon J.I. Genomic diversity and fitness of E. coli strains recovered from the intestinal and urinary tracts of women with recurrent urinary tract infection. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013;5:184ra60. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hagan E.C., Lloyd A.L., Rasko D.A., Faerber G.J., Mobley H.L. Escherichia coli global gene expression in urine from women with urinary tract infection. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001187. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lane M.C., Mobley H.L. Role of P-fimbrial-mediated adherence in pyelonephritis and persistence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) in the mammalian kidney. Kidney Int. 2007;72:19–25. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sokurenko E.V., Chesnokova V., Dykhuizen D.E., Ofek I., Wu X.R., Krogfelt K.A., Struve C., Schembri M.A., Hasty D.L. Pathogenic adaptation of Escherichia coli by natural variation of the FimH adhesin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:8922–8926. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Branda S.S., Vik S., Friedman L., Kolter R. Biofilms: The matrix revisited. Trends Microbiol. 2005;13:20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Koo H., Xiao J., Klein M.I., Jeon J.G. Exopolysaccharides produced by Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferases modulate the establishment of microcolonies within multispecies biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 2010;192:3024–3032. doi: 10.1128/JB.01649-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bokranz W., Wang X., Tschäpe H., Römling U. Expression of cellulose and curli fimbriae by Escherichia coli isolated from the gastrointestinal tract. J. Med. Microbiol. 2005;54:1171–1182. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46064-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zogaj X., Nimtz M., Rohde M., Bokranz W., Römling U. The multicellular morphotypes of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli produce cellulose as the second component of the extracellular matrix. Mol. Microbiol. 2001;39:1452–1463. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02337.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hall-Stoodley L., Stoodley P. Evolving concepts in biofilm infections. Cell. Microbiol. 2009;11:1034–1043. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01323.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kaplan J.B. Biofilm dispersal: Mechanisms, clinical implications, and potential therapeutic uses. J. Dent. Res. 2010;89:205–218. doi: 10.1177/0022034509359403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schilling J.D., Lorenz R.G., Hultgren S.J. Effect of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole on recurrent bacteriuria and bacterial persistence in mice infected with uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 2002;70:7042–7049. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.12.7042-7049.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hannan T.J., Totsika M., Mansfield K.J., Moore K.H., Schembri M.A., Hultgren S.J. Host-pathogen checkpoints and population bottlenecks in persistent and intracellular uropathogenic Escherichia coli bladder infection. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012;36:616–648. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00339.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mulvey M.A., Schilling J.D., Hultgren S.J. Establishment of a persistent Escherichia coli reservoir during the acute phase of a bladder infection. Infect. Immun. 2001;69:4572–4579. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.7.4572-4579.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Alteri C.J., Mobley H.L. Metabolism and Fitness of Urinary Tract Pathogens. Microbiol. Spectr. 2015;3:1–12. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MBP-0016-2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Alteri C.J., Smith S.N., Mobley H.L. Fitness of Escherichia coli during urinary tract infection requires gluconeogenesis and the TCA cycle. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000448. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hadjifrangiskou M., Kostakioti M., Chen S.L., Henderson J.P., Greene S.E., Hultgren S.J. A central metabolic circuit controlled by QseC in pathogenic Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2011;80:1516–1529. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07660.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Unden G., Bongaerts J. Alternative respiratory pathways of Escherichia coli: Energetics and transcriptional regulation in response to electron acceptors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1997;1320:217–234. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2728(97)00034-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tran Q.H., Unden G. Changes in the proton potential and the cellular energetics of Escherichia coli during growth by aerobic and anaerobic respiration or by fermentation. Eur. J. Biochem. 1998;251:538–543. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2510538.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Floyd K.A., Mitchell C.A., Eberly A.R., Colling S.J., Zhang E.W., DePas W., Chapman M.R., Conover M., Rogers B.R., Hultgren S.J. The UbiI (VisC) Aerobic Ubiquinone Synthase Is Required for Expression of Type 1 Pili, Biofilm Formation, and Pathogenesis in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2016;198:2662–2672. doi: 10.1128/JB.00030-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang Z.J., Joe B.N., Coakley F.V., Zaharchuk G., Busse R., Yeh B.M. Urinary oxygen tension measurement in humans using magnetic resonance imaging. Acad. Radiol. 2008;15:1467–1473. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.04.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mulvey M.A., Lopez-Boado Y.S., Wilson C.L., Roth R., Parks W.C., Heuser J., Hultgren S.J. Induction and evasion of host defenses by type 1-piliated uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science. 1998;282:1494–1497. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5393.1494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wright K.J., Seed P.C., Hultgren S.J. Development of intracellular bacterial communities of uropathogenic Escherichia coli depends on type 1 pili. Cell. Microbiol. 2007;9:2230–2241. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00952.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Floyd K.A., Moore J.L., Eberly A.R., Good J.A., Shaffer C.L., Zaver H., Almqvist F., Skaar E.P., Caprioli R.M., Hadjifrangiskou M. Adhesive fiber stratification in uropathogenic Escherichia coli biofilms unveils oxygen-mediated control of type 1 pili. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004697. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hadjifrangiskou M., Gu A.P., Pinkner J.S., Kostakioti M., Zhang E.W., Greene S.E., Hultgren S.J. Transposon mutagenesis identifies uropathogenic Escherichia coli biofilm factors. J. Bacteriol. 2012;194:6195–6205. doi: 10.1128/JB.01012-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pinkner J.S., Remaut H., Buelens F., Miller E., Åberg V., Pemberton N., Hedenström M., Larsson A., Seed P., Waksman G. Rationally designed small compounds inhibit pilus biogenesis in uropathogenic bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:17897–17902. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606795103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Velasquez M.T., Ramezani A., Manal A., Raj D.S. Trimethylamine N-Oxide: The Good, the Bad and the Unknown. Toxins. 2016;8:326. doi: 10.3390/toxins8110326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Morcos E., Wiklund N.P. Nitrite and nitrate measurement in human urine by capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 2001;22:2763–2768. doi: 10.1002/1522-2683(200108)22:13<2763::AID-ELPS2763>3.0.CO;2-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ghoniem G.M., McBride D., Sood O.P., Lewis V. Clinical experience with multiagent intravesical therapy in interstitial cystitis patients unresponsive to single-agent therapy. World J. Urol. 1993;11:178–182. doi: 10.1007/BF00211416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Vij M., Srikrishna S., Cardozo L. Interstitial cystitis: Diagnosis and management. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2012;161:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.He G., Shankar R.A., Chzhan M., Samouilov A., Kuppusamy P., Zweier J.L. Noninvasive measurement of anatomic structure and intraluminal oxygenation in the gastrointestinal tract of living mice with spatial and spectral EPR imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:4586–4591. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ong C.L.Y., Ulett G.C., Mabbett A.N., Beatson S.A., Webb R.I., Monaghan W., Nimmo G.R., Looke D.F., McEwan A.G., Schembri M.A. Identification of type 3 fimbriae in uropathogenic Escherichia coli reveals a role in biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 2008;190:1054–1063. doi: 10.1128/JB.01523-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.O’Toole G.A., Kolter R. Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways: A genetic analysis. Mol. Microbiol. 1998;28:449–461. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00797.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Greene S.E., Hibbing M.E., Janetka J., Chen S.L., Hultgren S.J. Human Urine Decreases Function and Expression of Type 1 Pili in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli. MBio. 2015;6:e00820. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00820-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Greene S.E., Pinkner J.S., Chorell E., Dodson K.W., Shaffer C.L., Conover M.S., Livny J., Hadjifrangiskou M., Almqvist F., Hultgren S.J. Pilicide ec240 disrupts virulence circuits in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. MBio. 2014;5:e02038. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02038-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hung C., Zhou Y., Pinkner J.S., Dodson K.W., Crowley J.R., Heuser J., Chapman M.R., Hadjifrangiskou M., Henderson J.P., Hultgren S.J. Escherichia coli Biofilms Have an Organized and Complex Extracellular Matrix Structure. MBio. 2013;4:e00645-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00645-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cegelski L., Pinkner J.S., Hammer N.D., Cusumano C.K., Hung C.S., Chorell E., Åberg V., Walker J.N., Seed P.C., Almqvist F. Small-molecule inhibitors target Escherichia coli amyloid biogenesis and biofilm formation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009;5:913–919. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.