ABSTRACT
Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) is a bacterium carried by or obtained from swine and other livestock. The initial and predominant swine-associated LA-MRSA sequence type (ST) identified is ST398. Here, we present 14 draft genome sequences from LA-MRSA ST398 isolates found in the United States.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
The isolation of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) from swine in 2004 raised public health concerns that swine may serve as the largest reservoir of MRSA outside the hospital setting. Initial surveillance in Europe revealed that the primary multilocus sequence type (ST) of European swine-associated LA-MRSA was ST398 (1), which has also been identified in North American swine (2–4). While ST398 is generally considered a livestock-adapted lineage (5, 6), there have been reports of colonization and infection of humans with LA-MRSA ST398 isolates (7, 8). To address the concerns surrounding LA-MRSA ST398, genetic studies have evaluated isolate relatedness and found that LA-MRSA ST398 is likely derived from a methicillin-sensitive ST398 lineage from humans (9). Detection of genetic changes and potential for human outbreaks with LA-MRSA ST398 isolates relies on continuing evaluation of genomic data from LA-MRSA field isolates.
Here, we provide draft genome sequences for 14 LA-MRSA ST398 isolates from a study conducted by Iowa State University that examined U.S. swine farms for the presence and prevalence of LA-MRSA (4). Isolates were obtained by swabbing the nares of healthy pigs or the environment within three high-density livestock operations. Farm and source information for each isolate is shown in Table 1. The isolates were grown in Trypticase soy broth (BD Biosciences, Sparks, MD, USA) and the High Pure template preparation kit (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA) was used to extract total genomic DNA.
TABLE 1.
Isolate information and genome assembly characteristics
| Isolate name | Isolate source | Farm no. | Avg coverage (×) | No. of contigs | GenBank accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISU 909 | Environment | 35 | 53.51 | 113 | LKWK00000000 |
| ISU 912 | Pig | 37 | 22.28 | 157 | LKWL00000000 |
| ISU 913 | Environment | 37 | 48.98 | 131 | LKWM00000000 |
| ISU 914 | Environment | 37 | 66.90 | 91 | LKWN00000000 |
| ISU 915 | Pig | 36 | 69.78 | 131 | LKWO00000000 |
| ISU 916 | Pig | 36 | 19.05 | 180 | LKWP00000000 |
| ISU 917 | Pig | 36 | 55.79 | 118 | LKWQ00000000 |
| ISU 918 | Pig | 36 | 34.41 | 113 | LKWR00000000 |
| ISU 919 | Environment | 36 | 21.71 | 140 | LKWS00000000 |
| ISU 920 | Environment | 36 | 55.34 | 177 | LKWT00000000 |
| ISU 922 | Pig | 36 | 36.63 | 105 | LKWU00000000 |
| ISU 924 | Pig | 36 | 41.26 | 71 | LKWV00000000 |
| ISU 925 | Pig | 36 | 37.02 | 116 | LKWW00000000 |
| ISU 927 | Environment | 35 | 38.79 | 109 | LKWX00000000 |
The Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to generate draft genomic sequence data. Indexed libraries were generated using the Nextera XT DNA sample preparation and index kit (Illumina). Libraries were pooled and run on an Illumina MiSeq instrument with the MiSeq V2 500-cycle reagent kit (Illumina), generating 2 × 250-bp paired-end reads.
The sequence data were assembled using MIRA version 4.0.2 (http://mira-assembler.sourceforge.net/docs/DefinitiveGuideToMIRA.html). The average coverage obtained for each isolate can be found in Table 1. To be retained in the assembly, contigs were required to be >1,500 bp in length and have a coverage of >66% of the average coverage for the genome. The assembly tool identified repetitive elements that were required to be >2,000 bp to remain in the assembly.
Accession number(s).
The assembled draft genome sequences generated in this study can be found in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank with the accession numbers listed in Table 1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by the USDA Agricultural Research Service and the National Pork Board.
There was no influence on study design or execution from funding sources. The products and trade names provided here were given for specificity and clarity. They do not imply recommendation by the USDA.
Footnotes
Citation Hau SJ, Bayles DO, Alt DP, Frana TS, Nicholson TL. 2017. Draft genome sequences of 14 livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398 isolates from swine farms in the United States. Genome Announc 5:e01082-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01082-17.
REFERENCES
- 1.Andreoletti O, Budka H, Buncic S, Colin P, Collins JD, De Koeijer A, Griffin J, Halvelaar A, Hope J, Klein G, Kruse H, Magnino S, Martinez Lopez A, McLauchlin J, Nguyen-The C, Noeckler K, Noerrung B, Prieto Maradona M, Roberts T, Vagsholm I, Vanopdenbosch E. 2009. Scientific opinion of the panel on biological hazards on a request from the European Commission on assessment of the public health significance of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in animals and foods. EFSA J 993:1–73. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Smith TC, Male MJ, Harper AL, Kroeger JS, Tinkler GP, Moritz ED, Capuano AW, Herwaldt LA, Diekema DJ. 2009. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain ST398 is present in midwestern U.S. swine and swine workers. PLoS One 4:e4258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weese JS, Avery BP, Reid-Smith RJ. 2010. Detection and quantification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clones in retail meat products. Lett Appl Microbiol 51:338–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02901.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Frana TS, Beahm AR, Hanson BM, Kinyon JM, Layman LL, Karriker LA, Ramirez A, Smith TC. 2013. Isolation and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from pork farms and visiting veterinary students. PLoS One 8:e53738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bal AM, Coombs GW, Holden MTG, Lindsay JA, Nimmo GR, Tattevin P, Skov RL. 2016. Genomic insights into the emergence and spread of international clones of healthcare-, community- and livestock-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: blurring of the traditional definitions. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 6:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2016.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Aires-de-Sousa M. 2017. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among animals: current overview. Clin Microbiol Infect 23:373–380. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Krziwanek K, Metz-Gercek S, Mittermayer H. 2009. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 from human patients, upper Austria. Emerg Infect Dis 15:766–769. doi: 10.3201/eid1505.080326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Golding GR, Bryden L, Levett PN, McDonald RR, Wong A, Wylie J, Graham MR, Tyler S, Van Domselaar G, Simor AE, Gravel D, Mulvey MR. 2010. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398 in humans, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis 16:587–594. doi: 10.3201/eid1604.091435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Price LB, Stegger M, Hasman H, Aziz M, Larsen J, Andersen PS, Pearson T, Waters AE, Foster JT, Schupp J, Gillece J, Driebe E, Liu CM, Springer B, Zdovc I, Battisti A, Franco A, Zmudzki J, Schwarz S, Butaye P, Jouy E, Pomba C, Porrero MC, Ruimy R, Smith TC, Robinson DA, Weese JS, Arriola CS, Yu F, Laurent F, Keim P, Skov R, Aarestrup FM. 2012. Staphylococcus aureus CC398: host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. mBio 3:e00305-11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00305-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
