ABSTRACT
MiSeq Illumina shotgun sequencing technology was used to sequence two Lactobacillus casei strains, designated strains GCRL 163 and MJA 12. The estimated genome sizes for GCRL 163 and MJA 12 were 2.9 Mb and 3.1 Mb, with 46.35% and 46.31% GC contents, respectively.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
The genus Lactobacillus within the phylum Firmicutes contains about 200 species that occupy diverse ecological niches, notably as endemic microflora of human and animal mucosal surfaces. Many species are of commercial importance due to their historical applications in the fermentation of plant, meat, and milk products, in the manufacture of bulk chemicals, and as probiotics and potential biodelivery agents (1). Members of the L. casei group, including species classified currently as L. casei, L. paracasei, and L. rhamnosus, are used as starter cultures in fermented milk products, and their presence in the nonstarter, adventitious microflora during ripening contributes to a cheese’s flavor (2). Of interest is how L. casei strains from different niches respond to and survive stresses encountered during manufacturing processes and probiotic consumption to confer functional traits (3). The full genome sequences of two L. casei strains, GCRL 163 (originally isolated from aged cheddar cheese) (4) and MJA 12 (isolated in this study from the fermented milk drink Yakult), are reported here.
Strains were grown in 1.5% glycine-supplemented MRS broth (Oxoid), cells were lysed by lysozyme/SDS treatment, and high-molecular-weight genomic DNA was extracted using modifications of a method originally described by Marmur (5). MiSeq Illumina technology was used to sequence the whole genomes (Macrogen Inc., Republic of South Korea). A total of 6,551,252 and 6,086,274 reads and 1,955,077,892 and 1,806,580,892 total read bases were obtained for L. casei GCRL 163 and MJA 12, respectively. ABySS (6) was used to assemble the whole-genome sequences. Based on 77 contigs (≥200 bp) the genome size of strain GCRL163 was 2.9 Mb with a GC content of 46.35%, and based on 96 contigs (≥200 bp) the genome size of strain MJA12 was 3.1 Mb with a GC content of 46.31%. The draft genome sequence was annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (7) and the Rapid Annotation using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server (8). A total of 2,938 genes and 2,807 coding genes for GCRL 163 and a total of 3,124 genes and 3,022 coding genes for MJA 12 were determined, with both strains showing >98.8% genetic similarity with L. casei ATCC 334 (Ga0029142) using the average nucleotide identity tool of the IMG database (9).
Using the RAST SEED Viewer, a total of 52 and 54 stress-response genes were found in the genomes of GCRL 163 and MJA 12, respectively, including 20 for oxidative stress and 14 for heat shock in both strains.
Wuyts et al. (10) recently noted the ongoing and long-standing taxonomic inconsistencies in the nomenclature of strains currently classified as L. casei group members. They identified three possible clades in the L. casei group based on gene content in core orthogroups and predicted functional capacity. Based on the GC% content of the whole genomes, the detection of a manganese superoxide dismutase gene, the lack of catalase genes, and the failure to detect a SecA2/SecY2 protein secretion system clustered with glycosyltransferase genes, both GCRL 163 and MJA 12 would be classified as members of clade A, which currently comprises strains belonging to L. casei and L. paracasei. We detected multiple copies of genes annotated as secA, two copies of yajC, and single copies of secE, secG, and secY, none of which were obviously clustered together.
Accession number(s).
These whole-genome shotgun projects have been submitted to DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers MODT00000000 (GCRL 163) and MODS00000000 (MJA 12).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Ali Al-Naseri for isolating L. casei MJA 12 from the commercial fermented milk product Yakult and Michael A. Charleston for helping to assemble the genomes using ABySS software.
This work was supported through the UTAS Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology Dean’s support funds and the Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture. A. Nahar was supported by an Endeavour Australia PhD Scholarship.
Footnotes
Citation Nahar A, Baker AL, Bowman JP, Britz ML. 2017. Draft genome sequences of two Lactobacillus casei strains isolated from cheddar cheese and a fermented milk drink. Genome Announc 5:e01235-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01235-17.
REFERENCES
- 1.Sun Z, Harris HMB, McCann A, Guo C, Argimón S, Zhang W, Yang X, Jeffery IB, Cooney JC, Kagawa TF, Liu W, Song Y, Salvetti E, Wrobel A, Rasinkangas P, Parkhill J, Rea MC, O’Sullivan O, Ritari J, Douillard FP, Paul Ross R, Yang R, Briner AE, Felis GE, de Vos WM, Barrangou R, Klaenhammer TR, Caufield PW, Cui Y, Zhang H, O’Toole PW. 2015. Expanding the biotechnology potential of lactobacilli through comparative genomics of 213 strains and associated genera. Nat Commun 6:8322. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Settanni L, Moschetti G. 2010. Non-starter lactic acid bacteria used to improve cheese quality and provide health benefits. Food Microbiol 27:691–697. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2010.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hosseini Nezhad M, Hussain MA, Britz ML. 2015. Stress responses in probiotic Lactobacillus casei. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 55:740–749. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.675601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Al-Naseri A, Bowman JP, Wilson R, Nilsson RE, Britz ML. 2013. Impact of lactose starvation on the physiology of Lactobacillus casei GCRL163 in the presence or absence of Tween 80. J Proteome Res 12:5315–5322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Marmur J. 1961. A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from micro-organisms. J Mol Biol 3:208–218. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(61)80047-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Simpson JT, Wong K, Jackman SD, Schein JE, Jones SJ, Birol I. 2009. ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res 19:1117–1123. doi: 10.1101/gr.089532.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Markowitz VM, Chen IM, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Grechkin Y, Ratner A, Jacob B, Huang J, Williams P. 2011. IMG: the integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D115–D122. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wuyts S, Wittouck S, De Boeck I, Allonsius CN, Pasolli E, Segata N, Lebeer S. 2017. Large-scale phylogenomics of the Lactobacillus casei group highlights taxonomic inconsistencies and reveals novel clade-associated features. MSystems 2:e00061-17. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00061-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]