Abstract
Background
Trophoblastic invasion of the uterine spiral arteries substantially increases compliance to accommodate increased blood flow to the placenta. Failure of this process impedes uterine artery blood flow, and this may be detected by uterine artery Doppler flow studies. However, the clinical utility of uterine artery Doppler flow studies in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes in a general population remains largely unknown.
Objective
To determine the utility of early second trimester uterine artery Doppler studies as a predictor of small for gestational age (SGA) neonates.
Study Design
Nulliparous women with a viable singleton pregnancy were recruited during their first trimester into an observational prospective cohort study at eight institutions across the United States. Participants were seen at three study visits during pregnancy and again at delivery. Three indices of uterine artery Doppler flow (resistance index, pulsatility index, and diastolic notching) were measured in the right and left uterine arteries between 16 weeks 0 days and 22 weeks 6 days gestation. Test characteristics for varying thresholds in the prediction of SGA (defined as birth weight <5th percentile for gestational age [Alexander growth curve]) were evaluated.
Results
Uterine artery Doppler indices, birth weight, and gestational age at birth were available for 8,024 women. Birth weight <5th percentile for gestational age occurred in 358 (4.5 percent) of the births. Typical thresholds for the uterine artery Doppler indices were all associated with birth weight <5th percentile for gestational age (P<0.0001 for each), but the positive predictive values for these cutoffs were all <15 percent and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) ranged from 0.50 to 0.60. Across the continuous scales for these measures, the AUCs ranged from 0.56 to 0.62. Incorporating maternal age, early pregnancy BMI, race/ethnicity, smoking status prior to pregnancy, chronic hypertension, and pre-gestational diabetes in the prediction model resulted in only modest improvements in the AUCs ranging from 0.63 to 0.66.
Conclusion
In this large prospective cohort, early second trimester uterine artery Doppler studies were not a clinically useful test for predicting SGA babies.
Keywords: Uterine artery, Doppler ultrasound, small for gestational age, gestational hypertension, spontaneous preterm birth
Introduction
Doppler flow studies of fetal vessels during pregnancy are useful tools for assessing the physiology of the maternal-fetal unit. The most commonly assessed fetal vessels are the umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery, for which Doppler flow studies are used in the assessment of fetal growth and fetal anemia, respectively.1,2 It has been suggested that Doppler studies of the maternal uterine arteries, which become substantially more compliant during pregnancy to accommodate increased blood flow to the placenta, may have clinical utility in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, the predictive capacity of these studies in unselected populations remains largely unknown (reviewed by Sciscione and Hayes).3
In normal pregnancy, placental trophoblast cells invade the inner third of the myometrium and migrate the entire length of the maternal spiral arteries. Remodeling of these high resistance arteries results in a low resistance and high flow state in the intervillous space, optimizing delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the fetus. This change in resistance during pregnancy is reflected by a high diastolic velocity and continuous flow during diastole in uterine artery Doppler studies.3 In women who develop adverse pregnancy outcomes attributed to placental dysfunction, there may be failure of trophoblast invasion of the uterine vasculature which results in retention of the muscle elastic coating of the spiral arteries and impedance to blood flow.4–6 In the non-pregnant state, there is a rapid rise and fall in uterine artery flow velocity during systole and a “notch” in the descending waveform in early diastole.6 During pregnancy, uterine artery compliance increases with resultant loss of the diastolic notch and decreased uterine artery resistance index (RI) and pulsatility index (PI).3,7 On average, the RI decreases from 0.8 to 0.63 and the PI from 2.0 to 1.3 by 18 weeks’ gestation.3,7,8
Abnormal uterine artery Doppler studies have been associated with subsequent adverse pregnancy outcomes including preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and perinatal mortality.3,9–13 In particular, models for predicting preeclampsia utilizing maternal clinical features, uterine artery Doppler studies, and maternal serum biomarkers are promising but may be too complex for widespread clinical application.9,13,14 In one large retrospective cohort, uterine artery PI was able to predict 25 to 77 percent of growth-restricted babies delivering at various gestational ages at a ten percent false-positive rate,15 while another observational study using biophysical (i.e., uterine artery Doppler studies) and biochemical markers at 19 to 24 weeks reported detection rates ranging from 100 to 42 percent for small for gestational age (SGA) neonates delivered before 32 weeks to greater than or equal to 37 weeks gestation, respectively.13 However, the predictive value of uterine artery Doppler testing in unselected groups of pregnant women appears to be low in systematic reviews of previous studies.3,9,10,16 Despite these conflicting data, many obstetricians continue to perform multiple Doppler studies of maternal and fetal vessels, including uterine artery Doppler studies, to identify women at risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development established the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b) to study the underlying causes and pathophysiologic pathways associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes (e.g., preterm birth, preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction) in nulliparous women.17,18 More than 10,000 women with singleton pregnancies were enrolled in the nuMoM2b study, which combined detailed demographic and medical information, clinical parameters, ultrasound measurements, genetics, biomarker measurements in biologic fluids, and psychosocial and behavioral measures in both pre-specified and exploratory analyses to identify pregnant women at risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.17,18 Uterine artery Doppler studies were performed for all nuMoM2b subjects during the second trimester of pregnancy in order to study the relationship between uterine artery compliance and adverse pregnancy outcomes attributed to placental dysfunction, including SGA birth weights and preeclampsia. The objective of the current analysis was to determine the utility of early second trimester maternal uterine artery Doppler study measures as predictors of SGA babies.
Materials and Methods
Nulliparous women with a viable singleton pregnancy were recruited during their first trimester into the nuMoM2b observational prospective cohort study at eight institutions across the United States. The Data Coordinating and Analysis Center was RTI International (Research Triangle Park, NC). Each site’s local governing Institutional Review Board approved the nuMoM2b protocol and procedures.18
Women were enrolled into the nuMoM2b cohort between 6 weeks 0 days and 13 weeks 6 days gestational age (first study visit). Gestational dating was based on a documented ultrasound crown-rump length measurement by a certified nuMoM2b sonographer at the first study visit, and women were considered eligible for enrollment if they had no previous pregnancy that lasted ≥20 weeks based on self-report and review of available medical records.18
Participants were evaluated at three study visits during pregnancy and again at delivery. Uterine artery Doppler studies were performed on all research subjects at the second study visit (16 weeks 0 days to 21 weeks 6 days) and repeated at the third study visit (22 weeks 0 days to 29 weeks 6 days) in women whose uterine artery Doppler study demonstrated a diastolic notch (any deflection from the baseline) at the second study visit. Certified sonographers performed the uterine artery Doppler studies via the transabdominal approach, and the transvaginal approach was used when transabdominal imaging was considered inadequate. The maternal uterine arteries were visualized at the lowest insonation angle achievable at the apparent crossover with the external iliac arteries. Since the placental implantation site can affect uterine artery waveforms, and uterine artery resistance has been reported to be higher when measured on the contralateral side to the placenta, both uterine arteries were sampled.19,20 Qualitative assessment of the flow velocity waveform (i.e., notching present or absent) was performed as well as quantitative analysis of the depth of the diastolic notch, RI ([maximum – minimum Doppler flow velocity] / maximum velocity), and PI ([maximum – minimum velocity] / mean velocity).3,7 Uterine artery Doppler images were reviewed centrally by nuMoM2b investigators for each sonographer before they were certified to perform uterine artery Doppler studies in nuMoM2b study participants.
For the current analysis, we focused on the results of uterine artery Doppler studies performed between 16 weeks 0 days and 22 weeks 6 days (second study visit window plus one week), because the second study visit was delayed for some women. We selected second study visits for our analyses, because fetal anatomic evaluation usually is performed within this gestational age range in low-risk patients, and because earlier pregnancy biomarkers are more likely to yield effective strategies for preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes. Women were excluded from this analysis if the second study visit ultrasound demonstrated maternal bradycardia (<40 bpm) or tachycardia (>130 bpm), fetal demise, or major fetal structural malformations or hydrops; if the measures of interest were not available for both the left and right uterine artery Doppler studies; or if the visit was delayed by more than one week outside of the visit window (i.e., greater than 22 weeks 6 days).
The primary outcome of this analysis was SGA defined as birth weight less than the fifth percentile for gestational age at delivery based on Alexander fetal growth curves.21 Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for depth of the diastolic notch, RI, and PI using the minimum value across right and left uterine arteries as the bilateral measure. Typical thresholds for the uterine artery Doppler measures (diastolic notch depth >1, 5, and 20 cm/sec; RI>0.58; and PI>1.60) were evaluated.3 In addition, threshold values optimizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity were determined and assessed. Test characteristics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios, were calculated for the thresholds on each of the measures in relation to the primary outcome. Areas under ROC curves were estimated using the Mann-Whitney U-statistics. Areas were compared using the method of Delong, Delong, and Clarke-Pearson.22 Multiple logistic regression models were used to incorporate demographic variables into the prediction. These variables, selected a priori, included maternal age, early pregnancy body mass index (BMI), race/ethnicity, smoking status in the three months preceding pregnancy, history of chronic hypertension, and pre-gestational diabetes. Logistic regression also was used to assess whether prediction could be improved by accounting for the gestational age at the time of the uterine artery Doppler assessment (considering a main effect and an interaction with the uterine artery Doppler measure).
Secondary outcomes that were analyzed included: preeclampsia or gestational hypertension preceding labor, spontaneous preterm birth, and stillbirth. Definitions for preeclampsia and antepartum gestational hypertension in the nuMoM2b study have been published previously.17 Briefly, antepartum gestational hypertension was defined as new onset hypertension that was ≥140 mm Hg systolic or ≥90 mm Hg diastolic on two occasions at least six hours apart after 20 weeks 0 days gestation and prior to labor and delivery. Preeclampsia included eclampsia, mild and severe preeclampsia, and superimposed preeclampsia.17 Spontaneous preterm births were defined as women who delivered at 20 weeks 0 days to 36 weeks 6 days secondary to preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes. Stillbirth was a fetal death at an estimated gestational age of 20 weeks 0 days or greater with Apgar scores of 0 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes with no other signs of life by direct observation.
Demographic characteristics of the nuMoM2b cohort were compared using Chi-square tests for women with newborns who were SGA versus those who were not. Tests were performed at a nominal significance level of 0.05 and no correction was made for multiple comparisons. SAS 9.3/9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc) software was used for analysis.
Results
A total of 10,038 women were enrolled into the nuMoM2b study between October 2010 and May 2014. Within this cohort, 8,050 women underwent successful uterine artery Doppler studies between 16 weeks 0 days and 22 weeks 6 days and were known to have delivered at 20 or more weeks gestation, making them eligible for this analysis (Figure 1; see Supplemental Table for comparison of characteristics between participants eligible for uterine artery Doppler analysis by availability of uterine artery Doppler measures [N=8,050] and participants whose uterine artery Doppler measures were not available [N=1,423]). Although women whose uterine artery Doppler measures were not available were older, more obese, and more likely to be African-American or suffer with chronic hypertension and or pre-gestational diabetes, they were not more likely to have the primary outcome (SGA less than the fifth percentile). A further breakdown is given in Figure 1 for the women included for each of the pregnancy outcomes studied in this analysis, specifically: the primary outcome – SGA (N=8,024); spontaneous preterm birth (N=8,046), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (N=8,033); and stillbirth (N=8,050).
Figure 1.
Participant flow chart demonstrates that 10,038 women were enrolled into the nuMoM2b study, 9,473 are known to have delivered after 20 weeks, and 8,050 of these women underwent successful uterine artery Doppler studies between 16 weeks 0 days and 22 weeks 6 days (excluding fetal demise, bradycardia, tachycardia, major structural malformation, and hydrops). For the 8,050 women with uterine artery Doppler measurements: 8,024 could be used in analysis on small for gestational age; 8,033 on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; 8,046 on spontaneous preterm birth; and all 8,050 on stillbirth.
Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between women who delivered SGA babies (N=358, 4.5 percent) and women who delivered babies whose birth weights exceeded the fifth percentile for gestational age at delivery (N=7,666; Table 1). Small for gestational age birth weights were associated with maternal race/ethnicity, early pregnancy BMI, and smoking status in the 3 months before pregnancy at p<0.05, but not with maternal age, a history of chronic hypertension, or pre-gestational diabetes.
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics of 8,024 participants who underwent successful uterine artery Doppler studies at the second study visit (16 weeks 0 days to 22 weeks 6 days) and whose pregnancy outcomes were available for analysis.
Demographic Characteristic | Fetal Growth Restriction Birth Weight <5th Percentile | ||
---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | P-value | |
Total: N (%) | 358 | 7666 | |
Maternal age, in years: N (%) | |||
13–17 | 8 (2) | 180 (2) | 0.5826 |
18–34 | 311 (87) | 6824 (89) | |
35–39 | 33 (9) | 558 (7) | |
>40 | 5 (1) | 103 (1) | |
Early Pregnancy BMI (kg/m2): N (%) | |||
Underweight (<18.5) | 18 (5) | 171 (2) | 0.0014 |
Normal (18.5–24.9) | 177 (51) | 3834 (51) | |
Overweight (25.0–29.9) | 96 (28) | 1876 (25) | |
Obese (30.0–34.9) | 33 (9) | 927 (12) | |
Extremely obese (>35.0) | 24 (7) | 736 (10) | |
Maternal race / ethnicity: N (%) | |||
Non-Hispanic white | 170 (48) | 4759 (62) | <.0001 |
Non-Hispanic black | 75 (21) | 970 (13) | |
Hispanic | 69 (19) | 1271 (17) | |
Asian | 21 (6) | 303 (4) | |
Other | 22 (6) | 362 (5) | |
Smoked tobacco in 3 months before pregnancy: N (%) | |||
Yes | 78 (22) | 1336 (17) | 0.0324 |
No | 279 (78) | 6327 (83) | |
Chronic hypertension: N (%) | |||
Yes | 13 (4) | 175 (2) | 0.1006 |
No | 345 (96) | 7477 (98) | |
Pre-gestational diabetes: N (%) | |||
Yes | 3 (1) | 108 (1) | 0.3652 |
No | 355 (99) | 7551 (99) |
BMI = body-mass index
Overall, a diastolic notch was detected in the left uterine artery of 30.6 percent of participants, while a diastolic notch was detected in the right uterine artery of 25.5 percent of participants. In the nuMoM2b cohort, placental implantation was reported as left-sided in 18.0 percent, right-sided in 23.6 percent, and neither in 58.4 percent of participants. Descriptive statistics for uterine artery Doppler measurements (early diastolic notch, RI, and PI) between 16 weeks 0 days and 22 weeks 6 days are listed in Table 2.
Table 2.
Descriptive statistics for uterine artery Doppler measurements taken between 16 weeks 0 days and 22 weeks 6 days for participants delivering at 20 or more weeks having left and right measurements.
Measurement | N | Min | Uterine Artery Doppler Percentile | Max | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | 5th | 25th | 50th | 75th | 95th | 99th | ||||
Left Side | ||||||||||
RI | 8050 | 0.05 | 0.31 | 0.38 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.66 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 1.77 |
PI | 8050 | 0.18 | 0.40 | 0.52 | 0.75 | 0.95 | 1.26 | 2.01 | 2.64 | 3.90 |
DND (cm/sec) | 8050 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.10 | 10.86 | 16.13 | 47.30 |
Right Side | ||||||||||
RI | 8050 | 0.06 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 1.25 |
PI | 8050 | 0.20 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 0.70 | 0.90 | 1.21 | 1.98 | 2.58 | 3.92 |
DND (cm/sec) | 8050 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.70 | 9.25 | 14.00 | 44.00 |
Bilateral (minimum of right and left) | ||||||||||
RI | 8050 | 0.05 | 0.27 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 1.00 |
PI | 8050 | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.45 | 0.63 | 0.78 | 0.99 | 1.44 | 1.96 | 3.10 |
DND (cm/sec) | 8050 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 7.10 | 11.16 | 29.23 |
RI = resistance index, PI = pulsatility index, DND = diastolic notch depth (no notch assigned a depth of 0 cm/sec)
In order to determine the ability of uterine artery Doppler screening during this period to predict SGA babies, ROC curves were constructed and optimal cutoff values were identified for depth of the diastolic notch, RI, and PI using bilateral measures (Figure 2). The area under the ROC curves (AUC) ranged from 0.56 to 0.62 for diastolic notch depth, RI, and PI. Based on the ROC curve analyses, optimal thresholds were identified. The thresholds that were analyzed were: 1) early diastolic notch depth ≥1, 5, and 10 cm/sec in both uterine arteries; 2) RI ≥ 0.58, 0.59 in both uterine arteries; and 3) PI ≥ 0.98, 1.60 in both uterine arteries.3,23 The presence of an early diastolic notch in both arteries also was analyzed. With the exception of 10 cm/sec for early diastolic notch depth, the thresholds listed above for the uterine artery Doppler indices were all associated with birth weights <5th percentile for gestational age at delivery (P<0.0001 for each). Test characteristics are listed in Table 3. The negative predictive values for the uterine artery Doppler measurements were all greater than 90 percent. However, positive predictive values were all less than 15 percent. Positive likelihood ratios for uterine artery Doppler measurements were all lower than 3.50 (Table 3).
Figure 2.
Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated to demonstrate the ability of uterine artery Doppler measurements to predict small for gestational age (birth weight <5th percentile for gestational age at delivery). A. Contrasts diastolic notch depth, resistance index (RI), and pulsatility index (PI) on continuous scales; B. Contrasts diastolic notch depth thresholds; C. Contrasts RI thresholds; and D. Contrasts PI thresholds. “Suggested” thresholds are from the literature. “Optimized” thresholds are those maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity.
Table 3.
Performance of uterine artery Doppler measurements between 16 weeks 0 days and 22 weeks 6 days in the prediction of birth weight <5th percentile for gestational age at delivery.
Thresholds for UAD measurements | N | Sens | Spec | PPV | NPV | LR+ | LR− | AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Early diastolic notch | ||||||||
Present | 1458 | 29.9% | 82.4% | 7.3% | 96.2% | 1.70 | 0.85 | 0.56 |
Depth of diastolic notch | ||||||||
≥10 cm/sec | 130 | 2.5% | 98.4% | 6.9% | 95.6% | 1.59 | 0.99 | 0.50 |
≥5 cm/sec | 795 | 15.9% | 90.4% | 7.2% | 95.8% | 1.65 | 0.93 | 0.53 |
≥1 cm/sec | 1448 | 29.6% | 82.5% | 7.3% | 96.2% | 1.69 | 0.85 | 0.56 |
Resistance index (RI) | ||||||||
≥0.58 (suggested) | 2121 | 44.4% | 74.4% | 7.5% | 96.6% | 1.74 | 0.75 | 0.59 |
≥0.59 (optimized) | 1893 | 41.6% | 77.3% | 7.9% | 96.6% | 1.83 | 0.76 | 0.59 |
Pulsatility index (PI) | ||||||||
≥1.60 (suggested) | 249 | 9.5% | 97.2% | 13.7% | 95.8% | 3.39 | 0.93 | 0.53 |
≥0.98 (optimized) | 2101 | 45.5% | 74.7% | 7.8% | 96.7% | 1.80 | 0.73 | 0.60 |
UAD = uterine artery Doppler, N = number positively screened, Sens = sensitivity, Spec = specificity, PPV = positive predictive value, NPV = negative predictive value, LR+ = positive likelihood ratio, LR− = negative likelihood ratio, AUC = area under the receiver operator characteristic curve. “Suggested” thresholds are from the literature. “Optimized” thresholds are those maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity on the primary outcome, fetal growth restriction.
Logistic regression models for SGA using the demographic characteristics listed in Table 1 were fit to the data with and without inclusion of the uterine artery Doppler flow velocity measures. The predicted probability of SGA from each of these models was then used to construct the ROC curves shown in Figure 3. The AUC for maternal demographic variables alone was 0.61, and the AUCs for each uterine artery Doppler measure plus maternal demographic variables ranged from 0.63 to 0.66. There was no improvement in the prediction by accounting for the gestational age at the time of the uterine artery Doppler assessment.
Figure 3.
Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated to demonstrate the ability of uterine artery Doppler measurements and maternal demographic variables to predict small for gestational age (birth weight <5th percentile for gestational age at delivery). Demographic variables that were included in the predictive model included early pregnancy body mass index, race/ethnicity, smoking, maternal age, chronic hypertension, and pre-gestational diabetes. A. Contrasts diastolic notch depth, resistance index (RI), and pulsatility index (PI) on continuous scales; B. Contrasts diastolic notch depth thresholds; C. Contrasts RI thresholds; and D. Contrasts PI thresholds. “Suggested” thresholds are from the literature. “Optimized” thresholds are those maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity.
The incidence of secondary outcomes were: preeclampsia/antepartum gestational hypertension (1,043/8,033=13.0%), spontaneous preterm birth (397/8,046=4.9%), and stillbirth (34/8,050=0.4%). Because the number of participants with these secondary outcomes was relatively low, additional subset analyses based on severity of preeclampsia/antepartum gestational hypertension and gestational age at delivery were not performed. For preeclampsia/antepartum gestational hypertension, ROC curves using the uterine artery Doppler measurements yielded AUC ≤0.55; for spontaneous preterm birth, ROC curves yielded AUC ≤0.52; and for stillbirth, ROC curves yielded AUC ≤0.60 (data not shown). Cutoffs for early diastolic notch depth, RI, and PI were evaluated for the three secondary outcomes, and test characteristics are listed in Table 4. The negative predictive values for the uterine artery Doppler measurements for all three secondary outcomes were greater than 87 percent, but positive predictive values were less than 22 percent, and positive likelihood ratios were lower than 2.00.
Table 4.
Performance of uterine artery Doppler measurements between 16 weeks 0 days and 22 weeks 6 days in the prediction of secondary outcomes (preeclampsia/antepartum gestational hypertension, spontaneous preterm birth, and stillbirth).
Thresholds for UAD measurements | N | Sens | Spec | PPV | NPV | LR+ | LR− | AUC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||
Early diastolic notch | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Present | GHTN | 1462
|
24.3% | 82.7% | 17.3% | 88.0% | 1.40 | 0.92 | 0.53 |
SPTB | 1463
|
17.4% | 81.8% | 4.7% | 95.0% | 0.95 | 1.01 | 0.50 | |
SB | 1464 | 26.5% | 81.8% | 0.6% | 99.6% | 1.46 | 0.90 | 0.54 | |
| |||||||||
Depth of diastolic notch | |||||||||
| |||||||||
≥10 cm/sec | GHTN | 131
|
2.3% | 98.5% | 18.3% | 87.1% | 1.50 | 0.99 | 0.50 |
SPTB | 131
|
2.3% | 98.4% | 6.9% | 95.1% | 1.42 | 0.99 | 0.50 | |
SB | 131 | 0.0% | 98.4% | 0.0% | 99.6% | 0.00 | 1.02 | 0.49 | |
| |||||||||
≥5 cm/sec | GHTN | 796
|
13.4% | 90.6% | 17.6% | 87.5% | 1.43 | 0.96 | 0.52 |
SPTB | 796
|
10.1% | 90.1% | 5.0% | 95.1% | 1.02 | 1.00 | 0.50 | |
SB | 797 | 8.8% | 90.1% | 0.4% | 99.6% | 0.89 | 1.01 | 0.49 | |
| |||||||||
≥1 cm/sec | GHTN | 1452
|
24.1% | 82.8% | 17.3% | 88.0% | 1.40 | 0.92 | 0.53 |
SPTB | 1453
|
17.4% | 81.9% | 4.7% | 95.0% | 0.96 | 1.01 | 0.50 | |
SB | 1454 | 26.5% | 82.0% | 0.6% | 99.6% | 1.47 | 0.90 | 0.54 | |
| |||||||||
Resistance index (RI) | |||||||||
| |||||||||
≥0.58 (suggested) | GHTN | 2125
|
33.3% | 74.6% | 16.3% | 88.2% | 1.31 | 0.89 | 0.54 |
SPTB | 2125
|
24.2% | 73.5% | 4.5% | 94.9% | 0.91 | 1.03 | 0.49 | |
SB | 2126 | 38.2% | 73.6% | 0.6% | 99.6% | 1.45 | 0.84 | 0.56 | |
| |||||||||
≥0.59 (optimized) | GHTN | 1897
|
31.0% | 77.5% | 17.0% | 88.3% | 1.38 | 0.89 | 0.54 |
SPTB | 1897
|
21.2% | 76.3% | 4.4% | 94.9% | 0.89 | 1.03 | 0.49 | |
SB | 1898 | 32.4% | 76.5% | 0.6% | 99.6% | 1.37 | 0.88 | 0.56 | |
| |||||||||
Pulsatility index (PI) | |||||||||
| |||||||||
≥1.60 (suggested) | GHTN | 250
|
5.3% | 97.2% | 22.0% | 87.3% | 1.89 | 0.97 | 0.51 |
SPTB | 249
|
3.3% | 96.9% | 5.2% | 95.1% | 1.06 | 1.00 | 0.50 | |
SB | 250 | 5.9% | 96.9% | 0.8% | 99.6% | 1.90 | 0.97 | 0.51 | |
| |||||||||
≥0.98 (optimized) | GHTN | 2106
|
33.4% | 74.8% | 16.5% | 88.3% | 1.33 | 0.89 | 0.54 |
SPTB | 2106
|
23.2% | 73.7% | 4.4% | 94.9% | 0.88 | 1.04 | 0.48 | |
SB | 2107 | 44.1% | 73.9% | 0.7% | 99.7% | 1.69 | 0.76 | 0.59 |
UAD = uterine artery Doppler, N = number positively screened (numbers vary slightly with the outcome due to availability of the information needed to define the outcome), Sens = sensitivity, Spec = specificity, PPV = positive predictive value, NPV = negative predictive value, LR+ = positive likelihood ratio, LR− = negative likelihood ratio, AUC = area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, GHTN = preeclampsia/ antepartum gestational hypertension, SPTB = spontaneous preterm birth, SB = stillbirth. “Suggested” thresholds are from the literature. “Optimized” thresholds are those maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity on the primary outcome, fetal growth restriction.
Predictive models that incorporated the maternal demographic variables yielded AUC 0.65 for preeclampsia/antepartum gestational hypertension and 0.56 for spontaneous preterm birth. Receiver operator characteristic curves that used maternal demographic variables and uterine artery Doppler measurements yielded AUCs ≤0.66 for preeclampsia/antepartum gestational hypertension and ≤0.57 for spontaneous preterm birth. These models were not significantly better than the AUCs based on demographic characteristics alone. There were too few stillbirths to incorporate the demographic characteristics into a predictive model.
Comment
In this large cohort of nulliparous women, abnormal uterine artery Doppler measurements obtained between 16 weeks 0 days and 22 weeks 6 days were associated with SGA defined as birth weight less than the fifth percentile for gestational age at delivery (P values <0.05). However, low positive predictive values (<15 percent) and positive likelihood ratios (<3.5) limited the predictive utility of the tests. This utility was not improved significantly even after adding maternal demographic variables into the predictive models. Low positive predictive values and positive likelihood ratios also limited the clinical utility of uterine artery Doppler measurements for predicting preeclampsia/gestational hypertension, spontaneous preterm birth, and stillbirth.
The major strength of this study is its generalizability for other general obstetric populations – a large number of nulliparous women (10,038) were enrolled into the nuMoM2b cohort at eight institutions across the United States. Sonographers were certified centrally before performing the uterine artery Doppler studies, and maternal demographic characteristics and outcomes data were collected prospectively by certified research coordinators. Limitations of the study are: 1) 11.5 percent of participants in the nuMoM2b cohort did not undergo bilateral second trimester uterine artery Doppler studies (see supplemental table); 2) the clinical utility of uterine artery Doppler studies were not analyzed in high-risk patient subgroups (e.g., women with chronic hypertension, pre-gestational diabetes, and/or history of cigarette smoking); 3) only nulliparous women were studied; and 4) the clinical utility of uterine artery Doppler studies in the first and third trimesters were not analyzed.
Previous studies performed primarily in Europe have yielded strong associations between maternal uterine artery resistance and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including SGA neonates, but the clinical utility of uterine artery Doppler studies in predicting these adverse outcomes has not been determined.3 Interestingly, higher levels of apoptosis and altered antioxidant defenses have been observed in placentas from pregnancies with high-resistance uterine artery flow.24 However, a quantitative systematic review of early clinical studies using likelihood ratio as a measure of diagnostic accuracy concluded that uterine artery Doppler flow velocity has limited diagnostic accuracy in predicting preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and perinatal death.16 In a recent, large retrospective study (N=23,894 participants), uterine artery PI at 19 to 24 weeks gestation was associated with high detection rates for SGA neonates (<5th percentile) at a ten percent false positive rate.15 The average PI in the SGA group was 1.1±0.83, compared to 0.8±0.53 in the average for gestational age group, but cutoffs and positive predictive values, which are needed to demonstrate clinical utility, were not reported.15 In the largest prospective cohort (N=123,406 participants) in which uterine artery Doppler studies were performed, the sensitivity of uterine artery Doppler studies for predicting preeclampsia ranged from 28–70 percent (false positive rate 5–10 percent) in women with clinical risk factors associated with preeclampsia.14 In this study, biomarkers such as uterine artery PI and maternal serum placental growth factor and sFlt-1 levels strengthened the relationship between clinical risk factors and preeclampsia, but the investigators did not analyze the performance of uterine artery Doppler in the entire cohort. The same group of investigators performed other studies in which sequential biophysical and biochemical screening, including uterine artery Doppler studies, and maternal mean arterial pressure were performed at 19 to 24 weeks and 32 to 36 weeks gestation to successfully predict a high proportion of SGA neonates.13,25 Unfortunately, the combination of uterine artery Doppler studies with maternal clinical risk factors and serum biomarkers might be a prohibitive undertaking that limits its clinical applicability. Our study is different from previous studies in the following ways: 1) an unselected, general obstetrical population was recruited from multiple centers across the US; 2) appropriate cutoffs were determined for three different uterine artery measurements (diastolic notching, RI, and PI); 3) bilateral studies were performed in all patients, and the more abnormal result was used in the analyses, since uterine artery flow may be lower contralateral to placental location; 4) four outcomes were studied – SGA, gestational hypertension/preeclampsia, spontaneous preterm birth, and stillbirth; and 5) the analyses focused on the most clinically relevant aspects of the uterine artery studies – positive predictive values, areas under ROC curves, and likelihood ratios.
Based on our results, routine early second trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in unselected nulliparous women did not accurately predict SGA babies, preeclampsia/gestational hypertension, or spontaneous preterm birth adequately to be considered clinically useful. Future studies should focus on the use of uterine artery Doppler studies in high-risk populations, either as a stand-alone test or in combination with maternal characteristics and biomarkers before therapeutic interventions are considered for those with abnormal results.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Supported by grant funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development: U10 HD063036, RTI International; U10 HD063072, Case Western Reserve University; U10 HD063047, Columbia University; U10 HD063037, Indiana University; U10 HD063041, University of Pittsburgh; U10 HD063020, Northwestern University; U10 HD063046, University of California Irvine; U10 HD063048, University of Pennsylvania; and U10 HD063053, University of Utah.
Footnotes
This study was presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Atlanta, GA, February 1–6, 2016.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01322529.
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Institutes of Health. The authors report no conflict of interest.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Alfirevic Z, Neilson JP. Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:1379–87. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90466-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mari G, Detti L, Oz U, Zimmerman R, Duerig P, Stefos T. Accurate prediction of fetal hemoglobin by Doppler ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:589–93. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01783-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sciscione AC, Hayes EJ Society for Maternal-Fetal M. Uterine artery Doppler flow studies in obstetric practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:121–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.03.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lin S, Shimizu I, Suehara N, Nakayama M, Aono T. Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in relation to trophoblast migration into the myometrium of the placental bed. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:760–5. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00020-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Meekins JW, Pijnenborg R, Hanssens M, McFadyen IR, van Asshe A. A study of placental bed spiral arteries and trophoblast invasion in normal and severe pre-eclamptic pregnancies. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1994;101:669–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13182.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schulman H, Fleischer A, Farmakides G, Bracero L, Rochelson B, Grunfeld L. Development of uterine artery compliance in pregnancy as detected by Doppler ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;155:1031–6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90340-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jurkovic D, Jauniaux E, Kurjak A, Hustin J, Campbell S, Nicolaides KH. Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of the uteroplacental circulation in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:365–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D, Campbell S, Hustin J. Doppler ultrasonographic features of the developing placental circulation: Correlation with anatomic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:585–7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91678-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Conde-Agudelo A, Bird S, Kennedy SH, Villar J, Papageorghiou AT. First- and second-trimester tests to predict stillbirth in unselected pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2015;122:41–55. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Papageorghiou AT, Roberts N. Uterine artery Doppler screening for adverse pregnancy outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17:584–90. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000191898.84567.04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Papageorghiou AT, Yu CK, Bindra R, Pandis G, Nicolaides KH Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening G. Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18:441–9. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00572.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Papageorghiou AT, Yu CK, Cicero S, Bower S, Nicolaides KH. Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in unselected populations: a review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;12:78–88. doi: 10.1080/jmf.12.2.78.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Poon LC, Lesmes C, Gallo DM, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 19–24 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:437–45. doi: 10.1002/uog.14904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gallo DM, Wright D, Casanova C, Campanero M, Nicolaides KH. Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 19–24 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Familiari A, Bhide A, Morlando M, Scala C, Khalil A, Thilaganathan B. Mid-pregnancy fetal biometry, uterine artery Doppler indices and maternal demographic characteristics: role in prediction of small-for-gestational-age birth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 doi: 10.1111/aogs.12804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chien PF, Arnott N, Gordon A, Owen P, Khan KS. How useful is uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth retardation and perinatal death? An overview. BJOG. 2000;107:196–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11690.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Facco FL, Parker CB, Reddy UM, et al. NuMoM2b Sleep-Disordered Breathing study: objectives and methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:542e1–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Haas DM, Parker CB, Wing DA, et al. A description of the methods of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: monitoring mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b) Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:539e1–e24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Antsaklis A, Daskalakis G, Tzortzis E, Michalas S. The effect of gestational age and placental location on the prediction of pre-eclampsia by uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in low-risk nulliparous women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:635–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00288.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kofinas AD, Penry M, Greiss FC, Jr, Meis PJ, Nelson LH. The effect of placental location on uterine artery flow velocity waveforms. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159:1504–8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90584-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:163–8. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00386-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chan FY, Pun TC, Lam C, Khoo J, Lee CP, Lam YH. Pregnancy screening by uterine artery Doppler velocimetry--which criterion performs best? Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:596–602. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00006-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Leslie K, Whitley GS, Herse F, et al. Increased apoptosis, altered oxygen signaling, and antioxidant defenses in first-trimester pregnancies with high-resistance uterine artery blood flow. Am J Pathol. 2015;185:2731–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lesmes C, Gallo DM, Saiid Y, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by uterine artery Doppler and mean arterial pressure at 19–24 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:332–40. doi: 10.1002/uog.14855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.