Abstract
Background
Galectin-3, a beta-galactoside binding lectin involved in important regulatory roles in adhesion, inflammation, immunity, and fibrosis, may be relevant to atrial fibrillation (AF) etiology.
Methods
We included 8,436 participants free of AF at baseline (1996–98) and with measures of plasma galectin-3 from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. We ascertained incident AF through 2013 from study visit ECGs, hospitalizations and death certificates. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for AF risk factors plus incident HF and CHD, were used to estimate hazard ratios for the association between galectin-3 and incident AF.
Results
The mean age (SD) of participants was 62.6 (5.6) years and was comprised of 58.7% women and 21.2% blacks. During a median follow-up of 15.7 years, 1,185 incident cases of AF were observed. After adjusting for AF risk factors, participants with galectin-3 levels ≥ 90th percentile (19.5 ng/mL) had a significantly higher risk of incident AF when compared to the lowest quartile (4.4 – 11.9 ng/mL), with hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of 1.40 (1.04 – 1.89) for the 90th – <95th percentile and 1.51 (1.11 – 2.06) for the 95th – 100th percentile. This association was attenuated and no longer statistically significant after accounting for incident CHD and HF as time dependent variables.
Conclusions
Elevated plasma galectin-3 is associated with increased risk of incident AF. Galectin-3 may increase AF risk via pathways involving CHD and HF.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Fibrosis, Galectin-3, Prospective study
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common supraventricular tachyarrhythmia.1 AF is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular sequelae, including heart failure, stroke, and premature mortality.2 Despite the identification of various risk factors and advancements in the management of AF, AF incidence is on the rise and the prevalence may more than double by the year 2050.1,3,4 There is, therefore, a need to identify modifiable risk factors that can help predict or offer avenues to mitigate this risk. Galectin-3, a beta-galactoside binding lectin involved in important regulatory roles in adhesion, inflammation, immunity, and fibrosis,5,6 may be relevant to AF pathogenesis. Inflammation and fibrosis of the myocardium may be particularly important in AF etiology.7 Inhibition of galectin-3 has been shown to interfere with myocardial fibrogenesis, and some have suggested it might be a therapeutic target for AF.8 Galectin-3 has been associated with atrial remodeling in AF patients9 and outcomes after catheter ablation of atrial AF.10,11 Recent epidemiologic studies have shown that blood levels of galectin-3 are associated positively with incident heart failure (HF) and coronary heart disease (CHD),6,12–14 but to our knowledge, only 2 prospective studies of exclusively whites have tested whether galectin-3 concentrations are associated with incident AF. Both studies reported positive associations that were no longer significant after adjusting for traditional AF risk factors.12,15 In the largest prospective study to date, involving whites and blacks, we tested the hypothesis that plasma galectin-3 concentration is associated positively with the incidence of AF after controlling for traditional risk factors and that this association would not be explained in its entirety by the association of galectin-3 with HF and CHD. Furthermore, a genome wide association study identified a non-synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (rs4644) in the galectin-3 encoding gene, LGALS3, to be strongly associated with plasma galectin-3 concentrations.16 We, therefore, also assessed whether the rs4644 in the LGALS3 gene would be associated with AF incidence.
Methods
Study population
The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study is a prospective epidemiological study aimed at identifying the risk factors for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases. Participants were recruited between 1987 and 1989 from 4 communities in the United States (Washington County, MD; the northwest suburbs of Minneapolis, MN; Jackson, MS; and Forsyth County, NC).17 ARIC consisted of 15,792 men and women aged between 45 to 65 years who were mostly white or black. Since onset, participants have been examined 5 additional times: visit 2 (1990 – 1992), visit 3 (1993 – 1995), visit 4 (1996 – 1998), visit 5 (2011 – 2013) and visit 6 (2016 – 2017). Participants are being followed by annual or semi-annual telephone interviews and active surveillance of ARIC community hospitals. ARIC was approved by the institutional review board of each participating center, and all participants provided written informed consent.
This analysis involved participants who were present at ARIC visit 4. Of 11,656 visit 4 participants, we excluded those who were not white or black due to small numbers, and those with unreadable visit 4 electrocardiograms (ECGs) (n= 243). Of the remainder, we excluded those with prevalent AF (n= 297), missing galectin-3 measurement (n= 904), prevalent HF or CHD (n=1190), or missing covariates (n=586). This left 8,436 participants included in our final analysis.
Atrial fibrillation ascertainment
Incident cases of AF occurring after ARIC visit 4 (1996 – 1998) until 2013 were identified through ECGs performed during follow-up visit 5, via hospital discharge records, or from death certificates. At visit 5, a 10-second 12-lead ECG was performed on participants with a GE MAC 1200 electrocardiograph (GE Medical Systems, Inc., Milwaukee, WI). ECGs were transmitted to the ARIC ECG reading center where they were coded. All readings coded as AF were reviewed by a cardiologist to confirm the diagnosis. Follow-up calls and review of local hospital discharges were used to identify and obtain information on all hospitalizations. A trained abstractor recorded all ICD-9 hospital discharge codes for the hospitalizations. An ICD-9 code of 427.31 or 427.32 was used to determine the presence of AF. Transient cases of AF occurring after cardiac surgery were excluded. That is, in an effort to limit the outcome to a consistent classification of AF, we excluded AF hospitalization diagnoses occurring simultaneously with heart revascularization surgery (ICD-9 code 36.X) or other cardiac surgery involving heart valves or septa (ICD-9 code 35.X), without evidence of AF in subsequent hospitalizations or study exams.18 All deaths due to AF (ICD-10 code I48 or ICD-9 code 427.3) were classified as cases. The validity of this AF ascertainment has been reported to be 84% sensitive and 98% specific.18 The incidence date of AF was defined as ARIC visit 5 ECG showing AF, the first hospital discharge with AF or atrial flutter, or death by AF, whichever occurred first.
Galectin-3 and risk factor ascertainment
Galectin-3 was measured using a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay on an Architect i 2000sr instrument (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL) in EDTA-plasma samples that were collected at visit 4 and had been stored at −70°C prior to analysis. The measurements were performed July 2015 – February 2016. The Architect galectin-3 assay has a limit of detection of 1.1 ng/mL and a limit of quantitation of 4.0 ng/mL. Interassay coefficients of variation were 5.2%, 3.3%, and 2.3% at mean galectin-3 levels of 8.8 ng/mL, 19.2 ng/mL and 72.0 ng/ml, respectively. At the time of blood processing, 402 participants' plasma specimens were split, masked, and sent to the laboratory to assess galectin-3 laboratory reliability. The reliability coefficient was r=0.92 and coefficient of variation, (CV)=7.5%. After removing 7 potentially mislabeled "outlier" samples these respective values were r=0.95 and CV=5.7%.
At visit 4, participants reported their race, use of antihypertensive medications within the previous 2 weeks, and smoking status. Blood pressure was measured with the use of a random-zero sphygmomanometer. The average of 2 readings which were taken after the participant had rested for 5 minutes was used. Height and body mass index (BMI) were measured.19 Diabetes mellitus was defined as fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L), nonfasting glucose ≥200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L), treatment for diabetes mellitus, or self-reported physician diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Total cholesterol, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), and Troponin T (TnT) were measured from blood samples as described previously.20–22 Ascertainment and definitions of prevalent and incident HF and CHD have been described.19,23 The rs4644 SNP genotying was performed using the HumanExome BeadChip Array.24
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and STATA, version 12 (Stata, College Station, TX). Baseline characteristics of participants were described by galectin-3 quartiles. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between galectin-3 and incident AF. Models included galectin-3 in categories (0% – <25%, 25% – <50%, 50% – <75%, 75% – <90%, 90% – <95%, and 95% – 100%) due to no a priori set cut point, and as a natural log transformed variable. Models were adjusted for age (years), race (white, black), sex (female, male), systolic blood pressure (mmHg), blood pressure medications (yes, no), BMI (kg/m2), height (meters), diabetes status (yes, no), total cholesterol (mg/dL), smoking status (current, former, never), eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2), rs4644 genotype (CC, AC, AA), ln NT-proBNP (ln pg/mL), ln CRP (ln mg/l), and ln TnT (ln ng/L).We verified that the proportional hazards assumption was not violated by testing the interaction of log follow-up time with galectin-3 (p = 0.66). Cubic splines, adjusted for age, sex and race with 5 knots at the 5th, 27.5th, 50th, 72.5th and 95th percentiles, were used to characterize the association between galectin-3 and AF incidence. Because the regression analysis and spline graphs showed the association mainly restricted to the highest galectin-3 levels, we ultimately split the highest quartile into 3 categories and compared them to the lowest quartile (referent group). The test for linear trend was derived after assigning the median value of each category of galectin-3 and modeling as a continuous variable. We tested for interactions between age, sex, race, and galectin-3. Only the age by galectin-3 interaction was significant (p=0.03); yet, after dichotomizing age by the median and adjusting for age as a categorical variable, the interaction was modest and no longer significant (p=0.14).
In a secondary analysis, we assessed the association between galectin-3 and incident AF adjusting for interim HF and CHD as time dependent covariates. In another analysis, we assessed for time dependency of the association between galectin-3 and incident AF by categorizing the follow-up time into three time periods (0 – 8 years, >8 – 13 years, and > 13 years).
We also examined the race-specific associations of the LGALS3 rs4644 genotype (CC, AC, and AA) with AF incidence using Cox models. For each participant, we coded the SNP as having 0 (CC), 1 (AC), or 2 (AA) copies of the minor allele and used an additive genetic model. For the analysis in blacks, we also adjusted for 10 principal components of ancestry.
The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study is carried out as a collaborative study supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) contracts (HHSN268201100005C, HHSN268201100006C, HHSN268201100007C, HHSN268201100008C, HHSN268201100009C, HHSN268201100010C, HHSN268201100011C, and HHSN268201100012C). Abbott Diagnostics provided funding for the galectin-3 measurements. Dr. Alonso was supported by American Heart Association grant 16EIA26410001. The authors are solely responsible for the design and conduct of this study, all study analyses, the drafting and editing of the paper and its final contents.
Results
At the ARIC visit 4 baseline, among 8,436 study participants (58.7% women, 21.2% black, and mean age=62.6 years), mean galectin-3 levels were found to be significantly higher in women (15.4 ng/mL) than men (13.5 ng/mL) (p <0.0001) and in black participants (15.6 ng/mL) than whites (14.4 ng/mL) (p <0.0001). Galectin-3 was also associated with all AF risk factors except current smoking status (Table I).
Table I.
Galectin-3 (ng/mL) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
Characteristics* | Q1 (4.4 – 11.9) |
Q2 (12.0 – 14.1) |
Q3 (14.2 – 16.6) |
Q4 (16.7 – 114.0) |
N | 2126 | 2130 | 2049 | 2131 |
Age (years) | 61.4 (5.4) | 62.2 (5.6) | 62.7 (5.6) | 64.0 (5.7) |
Sex (% male) | 58.9 | 46.8 | 35.0 | 24.4 |
Race (% black) | 16.5 | 19.4 | 21.7 | 27.2 |
SBP (mmHg) | 125 (18) | 126 (19) | 127 (19) | 129 (20) |
Antihypertensive medication (%) | 29.3 | 32.8 | 37.5 | 52.5 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 27.9 (4.7) | 28.0 (5.0) | 28.8 (5.6) | 29.8 (6.4) |
Height (m) | 1.70 (0.09) | 1.68 (0.09) | 1.67 (0.09) | 1.65 (0.09) |
Diabetes (%) | 13.4 | 11.9 | 14.6 | 17.8 |
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 198 (34) | 201 (36) | 203 (36) | 204 (37) |
Current smoker (%) | 14.3 | 15.7 | 13.4 | 14.5 |
eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2) | 92 (14) | 89 (14) | 86 (15) | 78 (18) |
CRP (mg/L)† | 1.6 (0.8 – 3.7) | 2.0 (1.0 – 4.4) | 2.6 (1.2 – 5.5) | 3.8 (1.6 – 7.5) |
Troponin T (ng/L)† | 5.0 (3.0 – 7.0) | 5.0 (3.0 – 7.0) | 4.0 (3.0 – 7.0) | 5.0 (3.0 – 8.0) |
NT-proBNP (pg/mL)† | 51 (25 – 100) | 61 (29 – 115) | 63 (33 – 113) | 82 (41 – 147) |
BMI: body mass index; CRP: C-reactive protein; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide: SBP: systolic blood pressure.
Values are mean (standard deviation) for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables unless otherwise specified.
Data are expressed as median (25th percentile – 75th percentile).
There was a total of 1,185 incident cases of AF during the follow-up period 1996 – 2013 (118,558 person-years). Because our analysis and spline graphs (Figure 1) showed the association restricted to the highest levels, we ultimately split the highest quartile into 3 groups and presented galectin-3 levels in percentiles (Table II). (See supplementary material for association between galectin-3 quartiles and incident AF.) In model 1, adjusted for age, race and sex, participants with galectin-3 levels ≥ 75th percentile (≥ 16.7 ng/mL) had a significantly higher risk of incident AF when compared to the lowest quartile (4.4 – 11.9 ng/mL), with HRs (95% confidence intervals) of 1.30 (1.07 – 1.57) for the 75th – <90th percentile, 1.75 (1.35 – 2.26) for the 90th – <95th percentile, and 2.35 (1.86 – 2.99) for the 95th – 100th percentile (p for trend <0.0001, Table II). The galectin-3 association was somewhat attenuated but the trend remained statistically significant after adjusting for other risk factors in model 2, with HRs (95% CI) = 1.37 (1.05 – 1.78) for the 90th – <95th percentile and 1.67 (1.29 – 2.16) for the 95th – 100th percentile (p for trend = 0.0004). After further adjusting for rs4644 genotype in model 3, the galectin-3 HRs (95% CI) were 1.63 (1.21 – 2.20) for the 90th – <95th percentile, and 2.02 (1.49 – 2.73) for the 95th – 100th percentile (p for trend <0.0001), and after further adjusting for cardiac biomarkers in model 4, galectin-3 HRs (95% CI) were 1.40 (1.04 – 1.89) for the 90th – <95th percentile and 1.50 (1.10 – 2.05) for the 95th – 100th percentile (p for trend = 0.004). When expressed as a continuous variable, the HRs (95% CI) for AF per 1 unit increment in ln galectin-3 were 2.01 (1.59 – 2.53), 1.33 (1.04 – 1.71), 1.70 (1.24 – 2.32), and 1.03 (0.77 – 1.39) for models 1 – 4, respectively (not shown).
Table II.
Galectin-3 (ng/ml) | P for trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||
0% – <25% (4.4 – 11.9) |
25% – <50% (12.0 – 14.1) |
50% – <75% (14.2 – 16.6) |
75% – <90% (16.7 – 19.4) |
90% – <95% (19.5 – 21.3) |
95% – 100% (21.4 – 114.0) |
||
N | 2126 | 2130 | 2049 | 1283 | 411 | 437 | - |
Events, n | 264 | 289 | 253 | 196 | 80 | 103 | - |
Person-years | 30522 | 30466 | 29321 | 17604 | 5426 | 5219 | - |
Incidence rate* | 8.6 (7.7 – 9.8) | 9.5 (8.4 – 10.6) | 8.6 (7.6 – 9.8) | 11.1 (9.7 – 12.8) | 14.7 (11.8 – 18.4) | 19.7 (16.3 – 23.9) | - |
Model 1 | 1 (Referent) | 1.09 (0.92 – 1.28) | 1.01 (0.85 – 1.20) | 1.30 (1.07 – 1.57) | 1.75 (1.35 – 2.26) | 2.35 (1.86 – 2.99) | <0.0001 |
Model 2 | 1 (Referent) | 1.06 (0.89 – 1.25) | 0.92 (0.77 – 1.10) | 1.11 (0.92 – 1.36) | 1.37 (1.05 – 1.78) | 1.67 (1.29 – 2.16) | 0.0004 |
Model 3 | 1 (Referent) | 1.15 (0.96 – 1.38) | 1.05 (0.86 – 1.29) | 1.30 (1.03 – 1.64) | 1.63 (1.21 – 2.20) | 2.02 (1.49 – 2.73) | <0.0001 |
Model 4 | 1 (Referent) | 1.07 (0.90 – 1.28) | 0.96 (0.78 – 1.17) | 1.16 (0.92 – 1.46) | 1.40 (1.04 – 1.89) | 1.50 (1.10 – 2.05) | 0.004 |
Incidence rate is unadjusted and per 1000 person-years.
Model 1: adjusted for age (continuous), race (white, black) and sex (female, male).
Model 2: Model 1 plus systolic blood pressure (continuous), blood pressure medications (yes, no), BMI (continuous), height (continuous), diabetes status (yes, no), total cholesterol (continuous), smoking status (current, former, never) and eGFR (continuous).
Model 3: Model 2 plus SNP rs4644 (CC, AC, AA).
Model 4: Model 3 plus ln NT-proBNP (continuous), ln CRP (continuous), and ln TnT (continuous).
In a secondary analysis, a total of 935 incident HF and 644 incident CHD events occurred during follow-up and before the occurrence of AF. After accounting for incident CHD and HF as time dependent variables while adjusting for covariates in model 4, the association between galectin-3 concentration and incident AF was attenuated and no longer statistically significant. The model 4 HR (95% CI) for galectin-3 ≥ 95th percentile versus the lowest quartile fell from 1.50 (1.10 – 2.05) in Table II to 1.11 (0.81 – 1.52) (p for trend = 0.24, Table III).
Table III.
Galectin-3 (ng/ml) | P for trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||
0% – <25% (4.4 – 11.9) |
25% – <50% (12.0 – 14.1) |
50% – <75% (14.2 – 16.6) |
75% – <90% (16.7 – 19.4) |
90% – <95% (19.5 – 21.3) |
95% – 100% (21.4 – 114.0) |
||
CHD*, n | 155 | 134 | 153 | 116 | 35 | 51 | - |
Heart failure*, n | 163 | 189 | 240 | 165 | 66 | 112 | - |
Hazard Ratio† | 1 (Referent) | 1.06 (0.88 – 1.26) | 0.89 (0.72 – 1.09) | 1.04 (0.83 – 1.31) | 1.32 (0.99 – 1.77) | 1.11 (0.81 – 1.52) | 0.24 |
CHD: coronary heart disease.
Events occurred after onset of study but before diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.
Adjusting for age (continuous), race (white, black) and sex (female, male), systolic blood pressure (continuous), blood pressure medications (yes, no), BMI (continuous), height (continuous), diabetes status (yes, no), total cholesterol (continuous), smoking status (current, former, never). SNP rs4644 (CC, AC, AA), eGFR (continuous), ln NT-proBNP (continuous), ln CRP (continuous), and ln TnT (continuous).
The association between galectin-3 and incident AF appeared to be strongest during the first 8 years of follow-up. The HRs (95% CI) per 1 unit increment in ln galectin-3 were 2.29 (1.40 – 3.74), 0.96 (0.58 – 1.61), and 0.99 (0.56 – 1.75) for follow-up times of 0 – 8 years, > 8 – 13 years, and >13 years, when adjusted for variables in model 3.
The frequencies of having 0, 1, or 2 copies of the A allele were 34.6%, 48.3%, and 17.1% in whites and 52.6%, 40.0%, and 7.5% in blacks. The mean galectin-3 concentrations decreased across those with 0, 1, or 2 copies: 16.7 ng/mL, 13.9 ng/mL, and 11.1 ng/mL (p for trend <0.0001) for whites and 17.3 ng/mL, 14.2 ng/mL, and 11.6 ng/mL (p for trend <0.0001) for blacks. The hazard ratios (95% CI) for AF in whites were 0.95 (0.82 – 1.09) for the AC genotype, and 1.10 (0.92 – 1.31) for the AA genotype compared to the CC genotype when adjusted for participants age and sex (p for trend = 0.46). In blacks, with additional adjustment for the 10 principal components of ancestry, these HRs (95% CI) were 0.88 (0.64 – 1.21) and 0.75 (0.40 – 1.41) for the AC and AA genotypes respectively (p for trend = 0.28) (supplemental table III).
Discussion
In this large prospective population-based study, we found that high levels of plasma galectin-3 were associated with an increased risk of AF over a median follow-up period of 15.7 years, and that the LGALS3 rs4644 minor allele was associated with lower galectin-3 levels in both whites and blacks but not associated with increased risk of incident AF.
The association between plasma galectin-3 and AF was moderately strong and independent of baseline AF risk factors and several biomarkers associated with AF. However, this association was accounted for by participants with high galectin-3 levels having developed more HF and CHD during follow-up before AF. The observed association may be explained by the role of galectin-3 in myocardial fibrosis. Activated macrophages secrete galectin-3, which leads to the activation and proliferation of fibroblasts, collagen deposition, and subsequent cardiac fibrosis and myocyte dysfunction.5,25 This cascade predisposes to AF, which further leads to more macrophage activation and perpetuation of this vicious cycle.5,25
Clinical evidence supports a role of galectin-3 in AF. Galectin-3 has been associated with atrial remodeling in AF patients9, with AF recurrence in patients who have undergone ablation,11 with cardiometabolic disease26, and with AF prevalence in case-control studies.9,27,28 On the other hand, 2 prior prospective epidemiological studies failed to find an independent association between galectin-3 levels and the incidence of AF.12,15 In both studies, higher galectin-3 concentrations were associated with an increased risk of AF in individuals in unadjusted analyses, but not after adjustment for other AF risk factors. Differences among existing studies may be attributed to several factors. We had a larger sample size (n=8,436) than the Framingham Offspring study15 (n=3306) and the PREVEND study12 (n=5958). Both previous prospective studies had a younger study population and shorter median follow-up times and therefore fewer incident cases of AF (Framingham Offspring study (n=250), PREVEND (n=225)) than our study (n=1,185). These would have given ARIC greater statistical power to detect an independent association, and the AF association was not linear and only apparent at high galectin-3 concentrations. In addition, prior to our study, no investigation had accounted for interim heart failure and coronary heart disease as possibly mediating a galectin-3 and AF association, a possibility also mentioned by Ho et al in the Framingham Offspring study.15
The LGALS3 rs4644 minor allele was associated with lower mean levels of galectin-3. Blacks had a lower frequency of the minor allele than did whites and, correspondingly, a higher mean plasma galectin-3 concentration. However, this SNP has been shown to lie within or near the epitopes of the binding region for the antibody used for our galectin-3 assay.16 This might affect the affinity of the antibody and therefore, the race-related relationship with galectin-3 levels may be artefactual. Adjustment for this SNP in our models slightly strengthened the association between plasma galectin-3 and AF.
A limitation of our study is that we had a single measure of galectin-3, in contrast with the PREVEND study12 which had 2 measurements of galectin-3 levels about 4 years apart. A second consideration is that galectin-3 measurements were made on samples stored for years. Although our lab QC and blinded QC data indicate excellent assay performance, we cannot rule out that sample degradation may have affected galectin-3 measurements. However, if sample integrity was a factor we would have expected this to lead to a significant reduction in the power of our analyses, and increase the likelihood of the null finding. Also, galectin-3 concentrations appear to be stable after storage for at least 6 months.13 Finally, galectin-3 levels may change prior to the AF occurrence, which we could not document with a single measure.
Another limitation to this study may be some misclassification of AF. AF cases were ascertained via hospital discharge codes and during visit 5 follow-up ECG examinations. Since 99% of our incident AF cases were ascertained through hospitalization records containing ICD-9 code 427.31 or 427.32, we unfortunately have no way to distinguish the type of AF presentation. In addition, we likely missed some paroxysmal cases of AF managed in the outpatient setting or other AF cases who had not presented to the hospital or for visit 5 follow-up examinations. However, it has been shown that the incidence rates of AF in the ARIC study are consistent with other population-based studies, and the validity of AF ascertainments using hospitalizations is acceptable. Also, making use of the hospitalization codes may have resulted in some false positives. In a sample of 125 discharge summaries, we were only able to confirm 89% of AF cases in ARIC.18
In conclusion, high galectin-3 levels are associated with an increased incidence of AF in the general population via pathways seemingly involving CHD and HF. The LGALS3 rs4644 SNP, though associated with mean galectin-3 levels, was not associated with AF incidence in either whites or blacks. Future work in independent cohorts should determine the value of galectin-3 measurements for risk stratification and prediction of new-onset AF beyond established risk factors and biomarkers.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the staff and participants of the ARIC Study for their important contributions.
Dr. Ballantyne has received research grant to institution from Abbott Diagnostics and consults with Abbott.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Disclosures
The other authors report no conflicts.
References
- 1.Wadke R. Atrial fibrillation. Dis Mon. 2013;59:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2012.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ball J, Carrington MJ, McMurray JJV, et al. Atrial fibrillation: profile and burden of an evolving epidemic in the 21st century. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:1807–1824. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, et al. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. 2006;114:119–125. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Colilla S, Crow A, Petkun W, et al. Estimates of current and future incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the U.S. adult population. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:1142–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jalife J. Mechanisms of persistent atrial fibrillation. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2014;29:20–27. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.de Boer RA, Voors AA, Muntendam P, et al. Galectin-3: a novel mediator of heart failure development and progression. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009;11:811–817. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schotten U, Verheule S, Kirchhof P, et al. Pathophysiological mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: a translational appraisal. Physiol Rev. 2011;91:265–325. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00031.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Takemoto Y, Ramirez RJ, Yokokawa M, et al. Galectin-3 regulates atrial fibrillation remodeling and predicts catheter ablation outcomes. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2016;1:143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2016.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sonmez O, Ertem FU, Vatankulu MA, et al. Novel fibro-inflammation markers in assessing left atrial remodeling in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:463–470. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kornej J, Schmidl J, Ueberham L, et al. Galectin-3 in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation. PloS One. 2015;10:e0123574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Clementy N, Benhenda N, Piver E, et al. Serum galectin-3 levels predict recurrences after ablation of atrial fibrillation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34357. doi: 10.1038/srep34357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.van der Velde AR, Meijers WC, Ho JE, et al. Serial galectin-3 and future cardiovascular disease in the general population. Heart. 2016;102:1134–1141. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Christenson RH, Duh S-H, Wu AHB, et al. Multi-center determination of galectin-3 assay performance characteristics: Anatomy of a novel assay for use in heart failure. Clin Biochem. 2010;43:683–690. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Djousse L, Matsumoto C, Petrone A, et al. Plasma galectin 3 and heart failure risk in the Physicians’ Health Study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16:350–354. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ho JE, Yin X, Levy D, et al. Galectin 3 and incident atrial fibrillation in the community. Am Heart J. 2014;167:729–734. e721. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.de Boer RA, Verweij N, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. A genome-wide association study of circulating galectin-3. PloS One. 2012;7:e47385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.ARIC Investigators. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study: design and objectives. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:687–702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Alonso A, Agarwal SK, Soliman EZ, et al. Incidence of atrial fibrillation in whites and African- Americans: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Am Heart J. 2009;158:111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Norby FL, Soliman EZ, Chen LY, et al. Trajectories of cardiovascular risk factors and incidence of atrial fibrillation over a 25-year follow-up: The ARIC Study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) Circulation. 2016;134:599–610. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Whelton SP, Roy P, Astor BC, et al. Elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a risk marker of the attenuated relationship between serum cholesterol and cardiovascular events at older age. The ARIC Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178:1076–1084. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Folsom AR, Lutsey PL, Astor BC, et al. Chronic kidney disease and venous thromboembolism: a prospective study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:3296–3301. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Folsom AR, Nambi V, Bell EJ, et al. Troponin T, NT-pro BNP, incidence of stroke: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Stroke. 2013;44:961–967. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chambless LE, Folsom AR, Sharrett AR, et al. Coronary heart disease risk prediction in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:880–890. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00055-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Grove ML, Yu B, Cochran BJ, et al. Best practices and joint calling of the HumanExome BeadChip: the CHARGE Consortium. PloS One. 2013;8:e68095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lippi G, Cervellin G, Sanchis-Gomar F. Galectin-3 in atrial fibrillation: Simple bystander, player or both? Clin Biochem. 2015;48:818–822. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nayor M, Wang N, Larson MG, et al. Circulating galectin-3 is associated with cardiometabolic disease in the community. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e002347. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen D, Procter N, Goh V, et al. New onset atrial fibrillation is associated with elevated galectin-3 levels. Int J Cardiol. 2016;223:48–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Szadkowska I, Wlazel RN, Migala M, et al. The association between galectin-3 and clinical parameters in patients with first acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Cardiol J. 2013;20:577–582. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2013.0157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.