Abstract
Klebsiella pneumoniae is a significant cause of nosocomial pneumonia and an alarming pathogen owing to the recent isolation of multidrug resistant strains. Understanding of immune responses orchestrating K. pneumoniae clearance by the host is of utmost importance. Here we show that type I interferon (IFN) signaling protects against lung infection with K. pneumoniae by launching bacterial growth-controlling interactions between alveolar macrophages and natural killer (NK) cells. Type I IFNs are important but disparate and incompletely understood regulators of defense against bacterial infections. Type I IFN receptor 1 (Ifnar1)-deficient mice infected with K. pneumoniae failed to activate NK cell-derived IFN-γ production. IFN-γ was required for bactericidal action and the production of the NK cell response-amplifying IL-12 and CXCL10 by alveolar macrophages. Bacterial clearance and NK cell IFN-γ were rescued in Ifnar1-deficient hosts by Ifnar1-proficient NK cells. Consistently, type I IFN signaling in myeloid cells including alveolar macrophages, monocytes and neutrophils was dispensable for host defense and IFN-γ activation. The failure of Ifnar1-deficient hosts to initiate a defense-promoting crosstalk between alveolar macrophages and NK cell was circumvented by administration of exogenous IFN-γ which restored endogenous IFN-γ production and restricted bacterial growth. These data identify NK cell-intrinsic type I IFN signaling as essential driver of K. pneumoniae clearance, and reveal specific targets for future therapeutic exploitations.
Author summary
The isolation of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains has significantly narrowed, or in some settings completely removed, the therapeutic options for the treatment of Klebsiella infections. Therapies targeting the immune system rather than the pathogen represent important alternatives. Despite the clinical relevance, there are still major gaps in our understanding of immune responses which drive the clearance of this pathogen. Type I interferons (IFNs) are known as powerful immune system regulators yet their effects on bacterial infections are disparate and remain elusive. In this study we show that type I IFN signaling is indispensable for mounting a protective and bacterial clearance-promoting immune response against K. pneumoniae. K. pneumoniae-induced type I IFNs launch a crosstalk between alveolar macrophages and NK cells by enabling NK cell IFN-γ production which in turn activates the macrophage anti-microbial armament. Type I IFN-responsive NK cells or IFN-γ administration rescue K. pneumoniae clearance in type I IFN-unresponsive hosts. Our study suggests that manipulation of type I IFN or IFN-γ levels might represent a valid strategy for treatment of drug-resistant K. pneumoniae infections.
Introduction
Klebsiella pneumoniae is a capsulated Gram negative pathogen which causes a wide range of infectious diseases, from urinary tract infections to pneumonia, the latter being particularly devastating among immunocompromised patients [1]. Of particular concern is the increasing isolation of multidrug resistant strains that narrows the therapeutic options for the treatment of K. pneumoniae infections [2–4]. To further complicate this scenario, recent population genomic studies have shown that virulent and multidrug resistant clones have access to a diverse mobile pool of virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes [2, 5] hence making possible the emergence of an extremely drug-resistant hypervirulent K. pneumoniae strain capable of causing untreatable infections in healthy individuals. It is then not surprising that multidrug resistant K. pneumoniae has been singled out as a significant threat to global public health by the World Health Organization, Centers of Diseases Control and Prevention, European Union and other organizations [4]. In light of this growing health problem, it is essential to better understand the immune pathways that are critical to host defense towards K. pneumoniae.
Successful defense against infections requires a coordinated action of multiple immune cell subsets. In this context, it is widely appreciated that type I interferons (IFNs) decisively coordinate immune responses by modulating cell-autonomous immunity and inflammatory responses, and by dictating immune cell-to-cell communications [6, 7]. While type I IFNs are the major effector cytokines of the host defense response against viral infections, a body of mainly recent data indicate that type I IFNs are also produced in response to bacteria [8–10]. However, depending on the bacterial infection, type I IFNs exert seemingly opposing functions [8, 10]. Type I IFNs protect against the progression of a localized Streptococcus pneumoniae lung infection to invasive disease [11, 12], prevent IL-1β-mediated tissue-damaging hyperinflammation in invasive soft tissue infection with Streptococcus pyogenes [13, 14] and restrict the growth of Legionella pneumophila in macrophages [15]. By contrast, type I IFNs impair the clearance of the intracellular pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis [16–18] and they are detrimental to host survival after Francisella tularensis infection [19, 20]. Overall, it is currently impossible to predict from the pathogen tropism or biology whether type I IFNs will be beneficial or detrimental for the host. This knowledge gap calls for additional mechanistic studies dissecting the type I IFN functions in other bacterial infections in order to define common and unique principles of the role of type I IFNs in host defense against bacterial infections.
Research over the last twenty years demonstrates that activation of early inflammatory responses, including production of TNF, IL-12, IL-23, IL-17 and IFN-γ, is essential to clear K. pneumoniae infections [21–23]. The role of type I IFNs in K. pneumoniae has so far not been addressed. Here we show that type I IFN signaling coordinates the communication between macrophages and NK cells to launch a protective immune response during lung infection with K. pneumoniae. Type I IFNs produced by macrophages upon K. pneumoniae challenge promote IFN-γ production by NK cells. IFN-γ in turn feeds back to prime macrophages for enhanced IL-12 production and bacterial killing. These results establish that NK cell-restricted type I IFN signaling entails resistance against severe lung infection caused by K. pneumoniae.
Results
Type I IFN signaling-deficient mice are susceptible to K. pneumoniae infection
The importance of type I IFN signaling during K. pneumoniae-induced pneumonia was assessed by infecting type I IFN 1 receptor-deficient (Ifnar1-/-) mice. Ifnar1 is one of the subunits of the type I IFN receptor which mediates type I IFN responses in innate and acquired immunity to infection. Mice were intranasally infected with K. pneumoniae strain 52.145. This infection model recapitulates Klebsiella-triggered human pneumonia [24, 25]. Strain 52.145 belongs to the K. pneumoniae KpI group which includes the vast majority of strains most frequently associated with human infection, including numerous multidrug-resistant or hypervirulent clones [2]. This strain encodes all virulence functions significantly associated with invasive community-acquired disease in humans [2, 5]. Ifnar1-/- mice infected with 5 x 104 CFU K. pneumoniae 52.145 exhibited a markedly decreased survival (Fig 1A) and increased weight loss (Fig 1B) as compared to wild-type (WT) controls, demonstrating essential contribution of type I IFN signaling to host defense against this pathogen.
To elucidate possible mechanisms by which the absence of type I IFN signaling resulted in increased lethality, we examined the ability of Ifnar1-/- mice to control bacterial growth. Analysis of bacterial loads in lungs 12, 24 and 48 h following K. pneumoniae infection revealed a significant defect of Ifnar1-/- mice to restrict bacterial replication (Fig 1C). Both Ifnar1-/- and WT mice exhibited similar bacterial burdens 12 h post infection (p.i.) (Fig 1C, left panel). However, in contrast to WT mice, Ifnar1-/- mice failed to control bacterial growth at later time points resulting in significantly higher bacterial burdens in lungs at 24 and 48 h post infection (p.i.) (Fig 1C, middle and right panel). Consistently, the difference in CFU between Ifnar1-/- and WT mice was increasing with time of infection. Higher bacterial loads were also found in the spleen and liver of Ifnar1-/- mice than in organs of WT animals at 48 h p.i. (Fig 1D). The bacterial burden in the spleen and liver was negligible and similar in both genotypes at 12 h p.i. Analysis of lung sections 48 and 72 h p.i. showed more severe bronchopneumonia in Ifnar1-/- mice compared to WT controls, as revealed by a higher overall histopathology score comprising airway inflammation, intralesional bacterial burden and neutrophil infiltration (Fig 1E and 1F). The bronchopneumonia involved bronchi, bronchioles and to a lesser extent alveolar ducts and alveoli. The inflammation was predominantly neutrophilic, and aggregates of bacteria were evident within the foci of inflammation. No appreciable differences between Ifnar1-/- and WT mice were noted in lung histology of animals which were given intranasal PBS (S1A Fig).
The lung pathology analysis suggested that severe lung destruction was the cause of increased mortality of Ifnar1-/- animals. To test this, we infected a cohort of Ifnar1-/- mice and monitored the progress of bronchopneumonia toward a lethal disease by comparing lungs of mice which were reaching behavioral and/or patho-physiological humane endpoints with lungs of mice which were showing mild symptoms at the same time of infection. In addition, we sampled lungs of mice which survived longer than 10 days and appeared recovered. Lung section analyses revealed that animals showing the most severe symptoms, i.e. animals approaching human endpoints, exhibited large areas of lung inflammation (more than 60% of the lung tissue affected) including increased intralesional bacteria and neutrophil infiltration (S1B Fig, left panel). The high degree of pathological changes in lungs of these mice was not compatible with life since animals with similarly severe symptoms ultimately developed a lethal disease in survival experiments (Fig 1). In contrast, animals showing only mild symptoms or animals surviving the 10 day observation period exhibited low or no lung inflammation at all, respectively (S1B Fig, middle and right panels).
K. pneumoniae induces type I IFN in IRF3- and TLR4-dependent manner
Having established the importance of type I IFN signaling for host defense against K. pneumoniae, we sought to determine the signaling pathway(s) activated by the pathogen to induce type I IFN production and signaling. Myeloid cells such as alveolar macrophages produce type I IFNs in response to many bacterial pathogens [8–10]. To test whether alveolar macrophages are type I IFN producers during K. pneumoniae infection, alveolar macrophages (CD45+CD11chighSiglecF+) were isolated from infected C57Bl/6 mice 24 h p.i. These cells displayed induction of Ifnb, the key type I IFN gene, when compared to uninfected controls (Fig 2A). Consistently, the type I IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) Isg15 was also induced (Fig 2A). Induction of Tnf confirmed that alveolar macrophages were activated by the infection (Fig 2A). Type I IFNs were also induced in the mouse alveolar macrophage cell line MH-S and bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) infected with K. pneumoniae (S2A Fig). In agreement, K. pneumoniae infection induced the expression of the ISGs Mx1, Ifit1 and Isg15 in BMDMs (Fig 2B). Tnf expression was similar in WT and ifnar1-/- BMDMs (Fig 2B). Further, we observed ISG15 modification (ISGylation) of proteins in K. pneumoniae-infected cells (S2B Fig). The induction of ISGs and ISGylation by K. pneumoniae was abrogated in Ifnar1-/- BMDMs demonstrating the requirement for type I IFN signaling (S2B Fig).
The central tenet of type I IFN production is that the initial wave of type I IFN production relies on the activation of the IFN-regulatory factor (IRF) 3 [26]. K. pneumoniae-induced expressions of Ifnb and of the ISGs Mx1, Ifit1 and Isg15 were ablated in infected Irf3-/- BMDMs Fig 2B). In contrast, Tnf expression was not affected by the Irf3 deletion (Fig 2B). These data reveal a fundamental role of IRF3 in induction of K. pneumoniae-triggered type I IFNs and ISGs.
Bacteria trigger type I IFN production by activation of various pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) [8, 10]. In vivo and in vitro evidence has demonstrated that TLR4 governs host defenses against K. pneumoniae [27–30]. To test the involvement of TLR4 in K. pneumoniae-induced IFN-β production, we employed BMDMs derived from Tlr4-/- mice. Supporting the key role of TLR4 in Ifnb induction, K. pneumoniae-triggered phosphorylation of Ifnb gene drivers IRF3 and the IRF3 kinase TBK1 [26] were abrogated in Tlr4-/- BMDMs (Fig 2C). The lack of TLR4 abolished induction of Ifnb, Mx1, Ifit1 and Isg15 and protein modification by ISG15 (ISGylation) (Fig 2D and S2C Fig). Consistent with the involvement of the canonical TLR4-activated pathway [26], macrophages lacking the adaptors TRIF and TRAM did not induce protein ISGylation and the expression of Ifnb, Mx1, Ifit1 and Isg15 in response to K. pneumoniae infection (S2D and S2E Fig). Phosphorylation of IRF3 and TBK1 was not stimulated in macrophages lacking the adaptors TRIF and TRAM, but proceeded normally in the absence of MyD88 (S2F Fig). Together, these results demonstrate that K. pneumoniae-induced type I IFN production and signaling is dependent on the TLR4-TRIF-TRAM-IRF3 pathway.
We and others have shown that K. pneumoniae capsule polysaccharide (CPS) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are recognized by TLR4 to launch inflammatory responses [31, 32]. Therefore, we hypothesized that these polysaccharides might be involved in TLR4-mediated type I IFN induction. To test this, macrophages were infected with a cps, O-polysaccharide, and double cps-O-polysaccharide K. pneumoniae mutants, and type I IFN was quantified in the supernatants of infected cells. The three mutants induced less type I IFN than the wild-type strain (Fig 2E) although the cps mutant induced more type I IFN than the two O-polysaccharide mutants. The lack of induction of type I IFN production was in agreement with the reduced phosphorylation of IRF3 triggered by the mutants (S2G Fig) indicating that the CPS and LPS O-polysaccharides are the K. pneumoniae factors activating TLR4 to induce type I IFN.
Type I IFN signaling promotes IFN-γ, IL-12 and CXCL10 production in response to K. pneumoniae in vivo
To confirm that type I IFN signaling is activated by K. pneumoniae also in vivo, we examined the lung tissue 12 h p.i. Expression of the ISGs Mx1, Ifit1 and Isg15 was induced in WT but not Ifnar1-/-mice (Fig 3A) corroborating the results obtained using infection of macrophages. To assess whether type I IFN signaling influenced the inflammatory response in lungs of K. pneumoniae-infected animals, we analyzed several inflammation-associated cytokines and chemokines 12 h p.i. K. pneumoniae–induced expression of IFN-γ, a critical cytokine for defense against lung infection with K. pneumoniae [22], was virtually absent in Ifnar1-/- mice at both mRNA and protein levels (Fig 3B and S3A Fig). Similarly, the induction of IL-12 mRNA (Il12b) and protein (IL-12p70), a key IFN-γ inducer, was impaired in Ifnar1-/- mice (Fig 3B and S3A Fig). The induction of CXCL10, a chemokine required for NK cell recruitment and host defense against K. pneumoniae [33], was abolished in Ifnar1-/- mice (Fig 3B). The mRNA of the immediate early cytokine Tnf was induced upon infection in both WT and Ifnar1-/- mice although the levels were lower in Ifnar1-/- when compared to WT animals (Fig 3B). At the protein level, TNF was comparable in both genotypes (S3A Fig). Expression of the anti-inflammatory Il10, the neutrophil chemoattractant Cxcl1 and the pro-inflammatory Il1b, were not affected by type I IFN signaling (Fig 3B and S3B Fig). The defect of Ifnar1-/- mice in induction of Ifng, Il12b and Cxcl10 was persistent and clearly detectable at 48 p.i. (Fig 3C). However, the expression of Tnf was no longer different between Ifnar1-/- and WT mice at this later time point (Fig 3C). The expression of Il10, Cxcl1 and Il1b was comparable in Ifnar1-/- and WT mice at 48 h p.i. (Fig 3C and S3C Fig), as observed already at the 12 h time point (Fig 3B). Together, the lack of type I IFN signaling results in defect in the production of IFN-γ, IL-12 and CXCL10 in K. pneumoniae-infected lungs.
Activation and accumulation of NK cells in K. pneumoniae-infected lungs is dependent on type I IFN signaling
The failure of Ifnar1-deficient mice to induce IL-12 and IFN-γ upon K. pneumoniae infection suggested a defect in immune cells producing these cytokines. Flow cytometry analysis revealed comparable numbers of alveolar macrophages (4% CD11chighSiglecF+ alveolar macrophages of CD45+ leukocytes) in lungs of Ifnar1-/- and WT animals 12 h after infection with K. pneumoniae (Fig 4A and S4A Fig). Infection did not increase the alveolar macrophage population over PBS-treated controls (Fig 4A). The numbers of neutrophils (Cd11b+Ly6G+Ly6Cmed) and inflammatory monocytes (CD11b+Ly6G-Ly6Chigh) in K. pneumoniae-infected lungs were also similar in both genotypes (Fig 4A, S4B Fig). Both neutrophils and inflammatory monocytes increased upon infection as compared to PBS-treated controls (Fig 4A), consistent with previous studies [21]. In contrast, the population of CD3-NK1.1+ NK cells, which have been implicated in defense against K. pneumoniae [34], was decreased in lungs of infected Ifnar1-/- mice when compared to WT controls both in terms of percentage of total leukocytes as well as absolute cell numbers (Fig 4B). The NK cell numbers in infected Ifnar1-/- mice were comparable to those in PBS-treated mice (Fig 4B). Importantly, the NK cell population from infected lungs of Ifnar1-/- animals contained significantly lower percentage of IFN-γ-producing cells than that from WT mice (Fig 4C). The populations of CD4 and CD8 T cells were also lower in lungs of infected Ifnar1-/- mice compared to WT controls (Fig 4D and 4F, S4C Fig) but these cells did not produce IFN-γ regardless of the genotype (Fig 4E and 4G, S4C Fig), as revealed by comparison with PBS-treated controls. The lower numbers of CD4 and CD8 T cells in Ifnar1-/- mice can be explained be impaired expression of the T cell chemokine Cxcl10. In sum, the absence of type I IFN signaling results in a defect in NK cell accumulation and NK cell-derived IFN-γ production in the lung of K. pneumoniae-infected mice.
Alveolar macrophage priming by IFN-γ enhances killing of K. pneumoniae
Macrophages require IFN-γ and/or IFN-γ priming for a complete anti-microbial response and for expression of the NK- and T cell-activating cytokine IL-12 and the NK and T cell chemoattractant CXCL10 [35, 36]. These responses were insufficiently activated in Ifnar1-/- mice (Figs 3 and 4) suggesting that the impaired IFN-γ production in Ifnar1-/- mice was causally involved in the low IL-12 and CXCL10 expression, and in the failure to control bacterial growth. To test this hypothesis, we isolated alveolar macrophages from WT and Ifnar1-/- mice, primed them with IFN-γ and infected subsequently with K. pneumoniae. Both WT and Ifnar1-/- alveolar macrophages primed for 5 h with IFN-γ induced Il12b upon K. pneumoniae infection (Fig 5A). Without priming, no Il12b was induced (Fig 5A). Cxcl10 was induced by IFN-γ alone in both WT and Ifnar1-/- alveolar macrophages (Fig 5A), consistent with the known direct activation of Cxcl10 by IFN-γ [36]. In contrast, Tnf and Il1b were induced regardless of priming (Fig 5A). To assess the effect of priming on the anti-bacterial activity, IFN-γ–primed or mock-treated macrophages were infected, treated with gentamicin 1 h p.i. and incubated for additional 2 h. As anticipated, priming of macrophages with IFN-γ for 2 h resulted in a significant decrease in the number of intracellular bacteria at 3 h p.i. (Fig 5B) confirming the activating effect of IFN-γ on anti-bacterial macrophage activity [37]. Adhesion and uptake of bacteria were not affected by IFN-γ treatment (Fig 5C). Together, these results suggest that the key function of type I IFN production and signaling in defense against K. pneumoniae infection is the induction of IFN-γ. Since we found that the TLR4-IRF3 axis drives type I IFN production and, consequently, type I IFN signaling in K. pneumoniae-infected BMDMs (Fig 2) we asked whether IRF3 is required for IFN-γ induction and host defense in vivo. Infection of Irf3-/- mice confirmed an impairment in Mx1 and Ifit1 but not Tnf induction (Fig 5D) suggesting that IRF3 is critically involved in K. pneumoniae-elicited type I IFN production in vivo. Moreover, Irf3-/- mice exhibited impaired expression of Ifng, Il12b and Cxcl10 and reduced ability to control bacterial growth (Fig 5E and 5F) demonstrating that deficiency in type I IFN induction has similar consequences for IFN-γ production as the lack of Ifnar1. Interestingly, however, direct triggering of type I IFN signaling by intranasally administered IFN-β into WT mice in the absence of K. pneumoniae did not activate Ifng gene expression in the lung despite a strong induction of ISGs as well as Cxcl10 (Fig 5G). Thus, IFN-γ, which is required for efficient killing of K. pneumoniae by macrophages, is activated by type I IFN signaling only in the context of K. pneumoniae infection.
Protective immune response against K. pneumoniae is independent of type I IFN signaling in alveolar macrophages and other myeloid cells
Since alveolar macrophages produce and respond to type I IFNs during K. pneumoniae infection (Fig 2 and S2 Fig) we asked whether alveolar macrophage-intrinsic type I IFN signaling contributes to the immune response in vivo by using Ifnar1fl/fl-CD11cCre mice. CD11c promoter-driven of Cre recombinase expression results in the deletion of a loxP-flanked allele in conventional DCs (CD11chigh) and alveolar macrophages [38, 39]. Consistently, Ifnar1 was deleted in alveolar macrophages isolated from Ifnar1fl/fl-CD11cCre mice (S5A Fig). Ifnar1fl/fl-CD11cCre mice were similarly resistant against K. pneumoniae infection as Ifnar1fl/fl controls (Fig 6B). Expression of the type I IFN target gene Mx1 was significantly reduced in lungs of Ifnar1fl/fl-CD11cCre mice (Fig 6C) demonstrating that the CD11c+ cells represent a significant population of type I IFN-responding cells in the lung during K. pneumoniae infection. However, in agreement with the efficient defense, expression of Ifng, Il12b, and Cxcl10 was not impaired in Ifnar1fl/fl-CD11cCre mice (Fig 6C). Expression of Tnf, Il10 and Cxcl1 was similar in both Ifnar1fl/fl-CD11cCre and Ifnarfl/fl mice (Fig 6C). Flow cytometry analysis revealed comparable numbers of alveolar macrophages, neutrophils, inflammatory monocytes, NK cells as well as CD4 and CD8 T cells in lungs of Ifnar1fl/fl-CD11cCre and Ifnar1fl/fl mice 12 h after K. pneumoniae infection (Fig 5D and S5B–S5D Fig). Furthermore, mice lacking Ifnar1 in macrophages and neutrophils (Ifnar1fl/fl-LysMCre) or neutrophils only (Ifnar1fl/fl-MRP8Cre) exhibited similar clearance of K. pneumoniae as Ifnar1fl/fl controls (S6A and S7A Figs). The expression of type I IFN responsive genes Mx1 and Ifit1 was reduced in Ifnar1fl/fl-LysMCre and to a lesser extent also in Ifnar1fl/fl-MRP8Cre mice (S6B and S7B Figs). Importantly, expression of Ifng, Il12b, and Cxcl10 and the numbers of key immune cell subsets were not impaired in Ifnar1fl/fl-LysMCre and Ifnar1fl/fl-MRP8Cre mice (S6C–S6F and S6C–S6F Fig).
Together, type I IFN signaling in alveolar macrophages and in myeloid cells in general does not contribute to protective immune responses against K. pneumoniae although these cells generate a substantial part of the type I IFN signature in the infected lung.
Type I IFN signaling promotes NK cell-mediated clearance of K. pneumoniae
To find out whether the impaired activation and accumulation of NK cells in Ifnar1-/- animals were causatively involved in the increased susceptibility to K. pneumoniae infection, we carried out NK cell transfer experiments. NK cells isolated from WT mice were adoptively transferred into Ifnar1-/- mice using 1 x 106 NK cells per recipient animal. Following K. pneumoniae infection, lungs of recipient mice were examined for NK cell accumulation, IFN-γ production by NK cells and bacterial burden. The numbers of donor WT NK cells in lungs of recipient Ifnar1-/- mice were higher than the numbers of recipients’ own NK cells (i.e., Ifnar1-/- NK cells) (S8 Fig), consistent with the observation that NK cell accumulation was higher in WT mice than in Ifnar1-/- animals (Fig 4B). Importantly, the recipient Ifnar1-/- mice showed similar percentages of IFN-γ-producing exogenous WT and endogenous Ifnar1-/- NK cells, and both of these percentages were significantly higher than the percentage of IFN-γ-producing NK cells in Ifnar1-/- mice without adoptive transfer (Fig 7A). Thus, the transfer of WT NK cells raised the percentage of IFN-γ-producing endogenous Ifnar1-/- NK cells. Finally, Ifnar1-/- mice that received WT NK cells exhibited approximately 10 times lower bacterial loads in lungs and almost lacked dissemination to the spleen when compared to mice which did not receive WT NK cells (Fig 7C and 7D). WT NK cells transferred into WT animals exhibited substantial IFN-γ production (Fig 7B) but they did not significantly raise bacterial clearance (Fig 7C and 7D), which is in agreement with the efficient defense of WT mice against K. pneumoniae infection.
These results suggested that the diminished NK cell-derived IFN-γ production was causative of the impaired bacterial clearance in Ifnar1-/- mice. To test this, Ifnar1-/- mice were intranasally administered IFN-γ at the time of infection. The IFN-γ treatment boosted the expression of Ifng and Cxcl10 (Fig 7E) and reduced bacterial loads in lungs (Fig 7F).
In sum, the data show that donor WT NK cells display similar properties in recipient Ifnar1-/- mice as in WT mice. Thus, the deficient NK cell accumulation and lower percentage of IFN-γ-producing NK cells observed in Ifnar1-/- mice (Fig 4B and 4C) result from a cell-autonomous defect. Moreover, Ifnar1-deficient NK cells regain the ability to produce IFN-γ if macrophage priming is accomplished by exogenous IFN-γ or by IFN-γ derived from transferred WT NK cells.
Discussion
In this study, we examined the role and mechanisms of action of type I IFN signaling in the context of lung infection with K. pneumoniae, a pathogen with one of the highest emergence of antibiotic resistant strains [2–4]. Our findings identify type I IFN signaling as a key driver of the mutually activating crosstalk between NK cells and alveolar macrophages which ultimately results in bacterial clearance and successful host defense. This discovery reveals a previously unrecognized mechanism of type I IFN-mediated anti-bacterial immunity and sheds light into regulation of immune responses against an utmost challenging human pathogen.
The protective effect of type I IFNs against K. pneumoniae-triggered pneumonia is caused by different mechanisms than those reported for other bacterial pathogens with the same tropism. Defense against S. pneumoniae, a gram-positive pathogen, is dependent on type I IFN signaling in alveolar epithelial type II cells. These cells require type I IFN signals to resist the destructive and death-promoting environment elicited in the course of S. pneumoniae infection [12]. The absence of type I IFN signaling causes an excessive destruction of the lung epithelial barrier and subsequent massive systemic dissemination of the pathogen. The lung barrier function is supported by type I IFNs by their protective effects on epithelial tight junctions and by inhibition of bacterial transmigration [11]. The protective effects of type I IFNs against infection with the gram negative intracellular pathogen L. pneumophila result from inhibition of the intracellular replication of the pathogen in infected macrophages [15]. The key type I IFN effector in this context appears to be the bactericidal itaconic acid which is produced by an enzyme encoded by the type I IFN target gene Irg1 [15]. In contrast, the protective effects of type I IFNs against K. pneumoniae described in our study result from NK cell-dependent IFN-γ-mediated restriction of bacterial growth. IFN-γ controls K. pneumoniae growth in the lung but the precise mechanism has not been elucidated [22]. Lung failure resulting from exacerbated infection-elicited tissue destruction is a critical aspect of pneumonia since mitigation of lung injury and/or lessening of inflammation is associated with disease amelioration [40, 41]. Thus, the higher and progressively increasing bacterial burden and tissue injury in the lung of K. pneumoniae-infected Ifnar1-deficient mice suggest that these mice ultimately suffer respiratory failure.
It is well established that type I IFNs are typically induced following intracellular sensing of invading and/or phagocytosed bacteria thereby resembling induction by viruses, i.e. obligatory intracellular pathogens [9, 10]. This intracellular signaling principle applies also to the cell wall component LPS which activates the IFN-β-inducing TBK1-IRF3 pathway upon signaling emanating from the LPS-TLR4 complex localized in the endosomal membrane [42]. Our study reveals that this intracellular signaling is also the driver of type I IFN induction by K. pneumoniae which triggers the TBK/IRF3 pathway upon TLR4-dependent recognition of LPS and the capsule polysaccharide (CPS). Most common bacterial inducers of type IFNs are cell wall components (e.g. LPS) and nucleic acids (both RNA and DNA) [10]. The capacity of individual inducers to activate type I IFN production appears to be different in different innate immune cell types [13] leaving open the possibility that K. pneumoniae employs other inducers in addition to LPS and CPS in vivo. Interestingly, the K. pneumoniae-induced type I IFNs have no autocrine functions since mice lacking Ifnar1 in alveolar macrophages, the key sentinel cells in the lung [43], are similarly resistant to infection as Ifnar1-proficient mice. This is in marked contrast to skin infection with S. pyogenes in which myeloid cells are both the key type I IFN producer and effector cells [14]. Our data demonstrate that type I IFNs promote production of IFN-γ, a critical activator of antimicrobial effector functions of macrophages, by NK cells in K. pneumoniae infection. The mechanism of antimicrobial macrophage activation by IFN-γ involves primarily the stimulation of oxidative burst but other effector functions are emerging [37, 44]. For example, the IFN target genes GBPs (guanylate-binding proteins), which are linked to phagosomal processes, and IFN-γ-stimulated metabolic reprogramming have been implicated in microbial killing by macrophages [44, 45]. Interestingly, recent evidence demonstrates the ability of K. pneumoniae to manipulate phagosome maturation and survive antimicrobial attacks by macrophages [46] suggesting that IFN-γ might counteract such phagosome evasion mechanisms of K. pneumoniae. Future studies should investigate molecular mechanisms of K. pneumoniae eradication by macrophages in detail. Importantly, our data show that such mechanisms are activated by IFN-γ but not type I IFNs since autocrine type I IFN signaling in alveolar macrophages is dispensable for both macrophage priming and protective immune response. Type I IFN and type II IFN (i.e. IFN-γ) signaling pathways share the transcription factor STAT1, raising the therapeutically important question of STAT1 target genes acting as specific effectors of IFN-γ signaling during host defense against K. pneumoniae infection.
We provide complementary evidence for the fundamental importance of NK cell-autonomous type I IFN signaling in defense against K. pneumoniae infection. First, the use of Ifnar1fl/fl-Cd11cCre, Ifnar1fl/fl-LysMCre and Ifnar1fl/fl-MRP8Cre mouse strains allows the conclusion that type I IFN signaling in none of the major myeloid cell subsets present in infected lungs contributes to IFN-γ and IL-12 production, and to host defense. Second, WT NK cells introduced into Ifnar1-/- mice produce IFN-γ in the Ifnar1-deficient environment and promote bacterial clearance. The NK cell-intrinsic requirement for type I IFN signaling in IFN-γ production in the course of K. pneumoniae infection is unprecedented in the context of bacterial infections studied to date. Interestingly, Ifnar1-/- NK cells retain the ability to induce IFN-γ in K. pneumoniae-infected Ifnar1-/- mice, as evident from IFN-γ production by Ifnar1-/- NK cells after adoptive transfer of WT NK cells. Classically, NK cell production of IFN-γ is triggered by IL-12 originating from various subsets of myeloid cells [47]. This implies that in context of the NK cell transfer experiment, the WT NK-derived IFN-γ restores macrophage priming and IL-12 production which in turn activate NK cells regardless of their type I IFN signaling capacity.
Type I IFNs can directly stimulate NK cells to produce IFN-γ in response to certain viral infections [48, 49]. It is speculated that this mode of IFN-γ production is relevant during infection with viruses which induce little or no IL-12 such as the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus [48]. Type I IFN-mediated NK cell stimulation involves direct activation of the IFN-γ gene driver STAT4 by the type I IFN receptor-associated JAK kinases [50, 51]. Such activation has so far not been reported for bacterial infections. Our experiment showing that administration of IFN-β alone does not result in IFN-γ induction indicates that type I IFNs act on NK cells in concert with accessory signals generated during K. pneumoniae infection. This mechanism would resemble IL-12 production by myeloid cells which requires signals derived from the pathogen recognition and from IFN-γ. NK cells express several pattern recognition receptors, e.g. TLR2 and TLR4, which potentially provide means for activation by bacterial products [52, 53]. However, the relevance of TLRs for NK cell activation during bacterial infections is unclear as NK cell-autonomous MyD88-dependent TLR signaling does not contribute to NK cell stimulation [54]. Of emerging interest are NK cytotoxic receptors since the activating receptor NKp46 and the mouse ortholog NCR1 have recently been demonstrated to act as pattern recognition receptors for Fusobacterium nucleatum and Candida glabrata [55, 56]. Thus, activating NK cell receptors might provide accessory signals for induction of IFN-γ by type I IFNs in the course of bacterial diseases such as the K. pneumoniae lung infection described in this study. The prominent role of type I IFN signaling in IFN-γ induction is in line with increased susceptibility of TRIF-deficient mice to K. pneumoniae infection [57]. TRIF-deficient mice exhibit impaired IFN-γ induction during K. pneumoniae infection and display improved resistance if treated with exogenous IFN-γ [57]. Our data showing the requirement for TRIF in IFN-β induction suggest that the impairment of IFN-γ production in TRIF-deleted mice is secondary to the deficient type I IFN (e.g. IFN-β) production in these mice. The exceptionally tight link between type I IFN signaling and NK cell IFN-γ production might represent a specific feature of defense against K. pneumoniae.
By virtue of their inhibition of viral replication type I IFNs became the first cytokines to be used in therapy of human diseases, most notably in infections caused by the hepatitis C virus [58, 59]. In contrast, the use of type I IFNs or their effectors for therapy of infectious diseases caused by bacteria is currently precluded by their incompletely understood and disparate effects during bacterial infections. Our study reveals an unexpected dependence of NK cell IFN-γ production on NK cell-intrinsic type I IFN signaling during bacterial pneumonia. This mechanism of IFN-γ induction and the resulting anti-bacterial activation of macrophages are indispensable for successful defense against K. pneumoniae lung infection. The increasing isolation of multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae strains makes an urgent priority to develop effective therapeutics based on new targets and concepts. K. pneumoniae is exemplary of the mismatch between unmet medical needs and the current antimicrobial research and development pipeline. Arguably, therapies targeting the immune responses which thereby circumvent antibiotic resistance are highly desirable. Our study reveals an important and therapeutically exploitable aspect of immune defense against K. pneumoniae. Importantly, clinical records reporting frequent K. pneumoniae infections in patients deficient in IL-12 [60] suggest that the type I IFN-driven communication network between IFN-γ-producing NK cells and IL-12-producing myeloid cells is relevant also for humans.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
Animal experiments were carried out at the Queen’s University Belfast and Max F. Perutz Laboratories of the University of Vienna. Experiments involving mice at Queen’s University Belfast were approved by the Queen’s University Belfast’s Ethics Committee and conducted in accordance with regulations described in the UK government Animals Act 1986 under the Project License PPL2700 issued by the UK Home Office. Animals were randomized for interventions but researches processing the samples and analyzing the data were aware which intervention group corresponded to which cohort of animals. Experiments involving mice at the Max F. Perutz Laboratories of the University of Vienna were discussed with the institutional ethics committee and performed in accordance with the Austrian law for animal experiments (BGBl. I Nr. 114/2012) under the permissions BMWF-66.006/0006-II/3b/2013 and BMWFW-66.006/0019-WF/V/3b/2016 issued by the Austrian Ministry of Science to PK.
Mice
Mice were bred and kept under specific pathogen free (SPF) conditions according to recommendations of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Association (FELASA). Ifnar1-/- mice have been previously described [61]. Ifnar1fl/fl-CD11c-Cre, Ifnar1fl/fl-LysMCre and Ifnar1fl/fl-MRP8Cre mice were obtained by crossing Ifnar1fl/fl mice [62] with CD11c-Cre mice, LysMCre and MRP8Cre [38, 63, 64], respectively, and littermate Cre+ and Cre- control mice were used. All mice were on C57BL/6 background. C57BL/6N wild type (WT) mice were purchased from Charles River (Vienna) and Harlan (Belfast). Experiments were carried out using 7–12 weeks old mice with age and gender being matched between genotypes. For experiments requiring anesthesia, a solution of 10 mg/ml ketamine and 1 mg/ml xylazine (aniMedica) in isotonic saline (Sigma) was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.).
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
K. pneumoniae 52.145 is a clinical isolate (serotype O1:K2) belonging to the CC65K2 virulent clonal group [5, 65]. The isogenic capsule mutant, strain 52145-ΔwcaK2, has been described [66]. The LPS O-polysaccharide mutants, targeting the glf glycolstransfrase essential for the LPS O-polysaccharide biosynthesis [67] were constructed by insertion mutagenesis using the pir replication dependent plasmid pSF100 (to be described elsewhere). Bacteria were grown in LB medium at 37°C and carbenicillin 50 μg/ml was added to the growth medium to grow O-polysaccharide mutants.
Cell culture and cell infections
Immortalized BMDM (iBMDM) cells (BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH, wild-type, NR-9456; Trif-/-, NR-9566; Tram-/-, NR-9567; Myd88-/-, NR-15633; and Trif-/-Tram-/- mice, NR-9568) were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Gibco 41965) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (Gibco) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. Murine alveolar macrophages MH-S (ATCC, CRL-2019) were grown in RPMI 1640 tissue culture medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (Gibco) and 10 mM HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were routinely tested for Mycoplasma contamination. To isolate BMDMs, tibias and femurs from wild-type, irf3-/- and tlr4-/- knock-out mice were removed using a sterile technique and the bone marrow was flushed with fresh medium. To obtain macrophages, cells were plated in L929-conditioned medium and cultivated for 4–6 days. Medium was replaced with fresh supplemented media every 3 days. For infections, bacteria were adjusted to an OD600 of 1.0 in PBS and infections were performed using a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 70 bacteria per cell. To synchronize infection, plates were centrifuged at 200 x g for 5 min. For incubation times longer than 60 min, bacteria were killed by addition of gentamicin (100 μg/ml) which was not removed until the end of the experiment.
Alveolar macrophage isolation and stimulations
To isolate alveolar macrophages (AMs), mice were euthanized by anesthetic overdose, trachea was surgically exposed and cannulated (BD Angiocath) followed by flushing of lungs with 5 x 1 ml of cold PBS + 0.5 mM EDTA. Obtained bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALF) from mice of the same genotype (n ≥ 6) were pooled on ice. Cells were collected from BALF by centrifugation (10 min, room temperature, 400 x g), resuspended and cultured in RPMI + 10% FCS + 1% penicillin and streptomycin. After 2 h, adherent cells were > 95% AMs as determined by trypan blue staining and were seeded for stimulation at the final concentration of 2 x 105 cells/ml in RPMI + 10% FCS. For priming, cells were pretreated with 5 ng/ml mouse IFN-γ (eBioscience) for 5 h, followed by infection (MOI = 70) for 1 h. To synchronize infection, plates were centrifuged at 200 x g for 5 min. One hour after treatment with gentamicin (150 μg/ml) cells were lysed using Isol-RNA Lysis Reagent (5 Prime) and RNA was isolated.
Model of lung infection
Bacteria in the stationary phase (overnight culture) were sub-cultured and grown at 37°C with agitation to reach mid log phase. Subsequently, bacteria were harvested by centrifugation (20 min, 2500 x g, 24°C), resuspended in 1x PBS and adjusted to 5 x 104–1 x 105 colony forming units (CFU) per 30 μl as determined by plating 10-fold serial dilutions on LB plates. Mice were anesthetized and 30 μl of bacterial suspension were inoculated intranasally. Infected animals were monitored every 4 to 8 hours and were euthanized when reaching behavioral and/or pathophysiological humane endpoints. Survival was monitored for 10 days. For experiments other than survival, animals were euthanized at indicated time points by either cervical dislocation or anesthetic overdose.
Determination of bacterial loads
To determine bacterial loads, mice were euthanized at indicated time points. Lungs, spleens and livers were aseptically removed, weighted and placed in cold 1 x PBS. After mechanical homogenization, 10-fold dilution series were prepared from organ homogenates and plated on LB plates. The following day, colonies were counted and bacterial load was calculated as colony forming units (CFUs) per gram of tissue.
Histology
Mice were euthanized by anesthetic overdose. To collect lungs for histology trachea was surgically exposed and cannulated (BD Angiocath). 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) was injected through trachea to inflate lungs, followed by their aseptic dissection from the thoracic cage. Inflated lungs were fixed overnight in excessive volume of 4% PFA, dehydrated, embedded in paraffin and 3 μm thick sections were prepared. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the sections was performed according to the standard protocol. H&E stained slides were evaluated by a board certified pathologist using an Axioskop 2 MOT microscope (Carl Zeiss). For additional review and image acquisition, representative slides were scanned using a Pannoramic Scan II slide scanner (3D Histech). Digital images were acquired with the Pannoramic Slide Viewer software (3D Histech). Sections were examined for airway inflammation (inflammatory cell infiltration of the intrapulmonary airways, alveolar ducts and alveoli), neutrophilic infiltration and intralesional bacterial burden (qualitative/semi-quantitative extent of bacterial presence within the regions of inflammation). Standard pathology criteria were used to score histomorphologic features of the lesion—degree of the lesion and the extent of involvement: score 0 –none/insignificant; score 1 –minimal; less than 10%, score 2 –mild; 10 to 30%, score 3 –moderate; 30–60% and score 4 –severe, more than 60%.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and cytokine measurement
Lung homogenates of infected and uninfected mice were prepared as for determination of bacterial load in 1x PBS containing protease inhibitors (Complete protease inhibitor, Roche) and frozen at -80°C. Homogenates were subjected to two cycles of thawing and freezing, centrifuged (5 min, 16000 x g, 4°C) and supernatants were collected for further measurements. Cytokine concentrations of TNF, IL-1β, IFN-γ and IL-12p70 were measured in supernatants using DuoSet ELISA kits (R&D Systems). Kits were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total protein in lungs was determined by Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific) and used for normalization purposes.
Immunoblot analysis
Lysates were prepared in lysis buffer (1x SDS Sample Buffer, 62.5 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 2% w/v SDS, 10% glycerol, 50 mM DTT, 0.01% w/v bromophenol blue). Proteins were resolved by standard 10% SDS-PAGE and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked with 4% bovine serum albumin (w/v) in TBST and protein bands were detected with specific antibodies using chemiluminescence reagents and a G:BOX Chemi XRQ chemiluminescence imager (Syngene). The following rabbit antibodies were used: anti-phospho IRF3 (Ser 396) (1:1000; Cell Signaling #4947), anti-phospho-TBK1 (Ser 172) (1:1000; Cell Signaling #5483), and anti-ISG15 (1:1000; Cell Signaling #9636). Immunoreactive bands were visualized by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulins (1:5000) or goat anti-mouse immunoglobulins (1:1000; Bio-Rad). To ensure that equal amounts of proteins were loaded, blots were re-probed with α-tubulin (1:3000; Sigma-Aldrich). To detect multiple proteins, membranes were re-probed after stripping of previously used antibodies using a pH 2.2 glycine-HCl/SDS buffer.
Type I IFN bioassay
Cells were seeded in (6-well plate; 1 x 106 cells per well) and grown for 24 h. Cells were infected (MOI = 100) for the indicated time points, and supernatants were collected. Murine type I IFNs were detected using B16-Blue IFN-α/β cells (Invivogen) which carry a SEAP reporter gene under the control of the type I IFN-inducible ISG54 promoter enhanced by a multimeric ISRE. Levels of SEAP in the supernatants were determined as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
Intracellular survival
K. pneumoniae intracellular survival was assessed as previously described with minor modifications [46]. Briefly, macrophages were seeded in 12-well tissue culture plates at a density of 2.5 x 105 cells per well 15 h before the experiment. Bacteria were grown in 5-ml LB, harvested in the exponential phase (2500 x g, 20 min, 24°C), washed once with PBS and a suspension containing approximately 1 x 108 CFU/ml was prepared in 10 mM PBS (pH 6.5). Cells were infected with 175 μl of this suspension to obtain MOI of 70 bacteria per cell in a final volume of 1 ml DMEM tissue culture medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS and 10 mM Hepes. To synchronize infection, plates were centrifuged at 200 x g during 5 min. After 30 min of contact, cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated for additional 60 min with 1 ml tissue culture medium supplemented with gentamicin (100 μg/ml) to eliminate extracellular bacteria. Initial attachment of bacteria was assessed after 30 min contact as previously described [46]. To determine intracellular bacterial load, cells were washed three times with PBS and lysed with 300 μl of 0.05% saponin in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. Serial dilutions were plated on LB to quantify the number of intracellular bacteria. Intracellular bacterial load is represented as CFU per ml. All experiments were done on at least three independent occasions.
RNA isolation, reverse transcription and quantitative PCR (qPCR)
Total RNA was isolated from lung homogenates and cells using Isol-RNA Lysis Reagent (5 Prime) or Trizol according to the manufacturer’s protocol. DNase digestion was performed using 10 U of recombinant DNase I (Roche). RNA was PolyA primed with Oligo (dT)18 primers (Eurofins Genomics) and reverse-transcribed using Mu-MLV reverse transcriptase (Fermentas). qPCRs were run on a Realplex Mastercycler (Eppendorf) or Stratagene Mx3005P qPCR System and cDNA was quantified by SYBR Green method using HOT FIREPol EvaGreen qPCR supermix (Medibena) or KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Kit. mRNA expression of the housekeeping gene Hprt was used for normalization purposes. Primers for qPCR were (in 5’-3’ orientation):
Hprt fwd-GCAGTCCCAGCGTCGTGAT, rev-CAGGCAAGTCTTTCAGTCCTGTC
Il12b (p40) fwd-ACAGCACCAGCTTCTTCATCAG, rev-TCTTCAAAGGCTTCATCTGCAA
Ifng fwd-CGGCACAGTCATTGAAAGCC, rev-TGTCACCATCCTTTTGCCAGT
Il1b fwd-AGATGAAGGGCTGCTTCCAAA, rev-AATGGGAACGTCACACACCA
Ifnb fwd- TCAGAATGAGTGGTGGTTGC, rev- GACCTTTCAAATGCAGTAGATTCA
Tnf fwd-GATCGGTCCCCAAAGGGATG, rev-CACTTGGTGGTTTGCTACGAC
Cxcl1 fwd-TGCACCCAAACCGAAGTCATAG, rev-TTGTATAGTGTTGTCAGAAGCCAGC
Il10 fwd-GGACTTTAAGGGTTACTTGGGTTGCC, rev-CATGTATGCTTCTATGCAGTTGATGA
Mx1 fwd-GACTACCACTGAGATGACCCAGC, rev- ATTTCCTCCCCAAATGTTTTCA
Ifit1 fwd-CAGGTTTCTGAGGAGTTCTG, rev-TGAAGCAGATTCTCCATGAC
Isg15 fwd-GGGGCCACAGCAACATCTAT, rev-CGCTGGGACACCTTCTTCTT
Cxcl10 fwd-TGCGAGCCTATCCTGCCCACGTG, rev-CCGGGGTGTGTGCGTGGCTTCA
Ifnar1 fl/fl fwd-GCCCTGCTGAATAAGACCAG, rev-ACTGGCCTCAAACTCACTGC
Flow cytometry
To prepare whole lung cell suspensions, lungs were cut to pieces with scissors and digested in RPMI containing 10% FCS, 1 mg/ml collagenase I (Roche) and 0.25 mg/ml DNase I (Roche) for 1 h at 37°C with agitation. Single-cell suspensions were obtained by flushing the samples through 70 μm strainer. Red blood cells were lysed using hypotonic shock and washed twice with PBS. To exclude dead cells, samples were stained with FVD eFluor 506 (eBioscience), prior to Fc blocking with anti-CD16/CD32 (2.4G2, BD). Suspensions were stained for cell surface proteins and intracellular IFN-γ in appropriate combinations of following monoclonal antibodies conjugated to allophycocyanin-eFluor 780, allophycocyanin, brilliant violet 711, phycoerythrin, brilliant violet 421, phycoerythtrin-cyanine7, peridinin chlorophyll protein-cyanine 5.5 and fluorescein isothiocyanate: anti-CD45 (30-F11), anti-CD11c (HL3), anti-SiglecF (E50-2440), anti-Ly6G (1A8), anti-Ly6C (HK1.4), anti-CD11b (M1/70), anti-CD3 (11-26c(11–26)), anti-CD8 (53–6.7), anti-NK1.1 (PK136) and anti IFN-γ (XMG1.2), purchased from BD, eBioscience and Biolegend. To prepare cells for intracellular staining, suspensions were incubated in fixation/permeabilization buffer (eBioscience), followed by Fc blocking, washing and staining in permeabilization buffer (eBioscience). Dead cells were excluded based on their light-scattering characteristics and FVD staining. Cell doublets were excluded based on FSC-H/FSC-A and SSC-H/SSC-A. All data acquisitions were performed using LSR Fortessa II (BD) cytometer interfaced with FACSDiva. FlowJo X (Tree Star) software was used for data analysis and graphical representation.
Sorting of alveolar macrophages
Mice were either infected or given PBS and euthanized 24 h post-treatment. Lungs were harvested, and dissociated using VDI 12 tissue homogeniser (VWR) in sterile PBS. Single-cell suspensions were obtained by flushing the samples through 70 μm strainer. To exclude dead cells, samples were stained with FVD eFluor 506 (eBioscience), prior to Fc blocking with anti-CD16/CD32 (2.4G2, BD). To sort out CD45+CD11chighSiglecF+ alveolar macrophages, cell suspensions were stained for cell surface proteins using monoclonal antibodies conjugated to allophycocyanin-eFluor 780, allophycocyanin and brilliant violet 421: anti-CD45 (30-F11), anti-CD11c (N418) and anti-SiglecF (E50-2440), purchased from BD Bioscience, eBioscience and Biolegend. RNA from sorted alveolar macrophages was extracted using Power SYBR Green Cells-to-CT Kit (4402954, Ambion) according to manufacturer’s instructions.
NK isolation and adoptive transfer
Splenic NK cells from WT mice were isolated by magnetic bead labeling (CD49b+ DX5 microbeads) following manufacturer’s instructions (Miltenyi Biotec). Before magnetic separation, 1 x 107 cells were labeled with CellTrace CFSE kit (Thermo) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Labeled NK cells (1 x 106 cells/mouse) were adoptively transferred intravenously into ifnar1-/- mice, which were infected intranasally with 3 x 105 K. pneumoniae 52.145 CFU. 24 h post infection mice were euthanized and bacterial loads in lungs determined. Intracellular IFN-γ was detected using anti IFN-γ (XMG1.2). Cells were analyzed using a FACSCantoII flow cytometer and FlowJo software (Tree Star).
IFN-γ treatment of animals
For IFN-γ rescue analysis, Ifnar1-/- mice were infected with standard inoculum, and immediately post-infection intranasally given 20 μl of PBS, or 100 ng rIFN-γ in 20 μl of PBS (recombinant Mouse IFN-gamma Protein, R&D, Carrier Free, cat. number 485-MI-100, LOT#CFP2516032). Mice were euthanized 24 h p.i. and bacterial loads and mRNA expression in lungs were determined.
IFN-β treatment of animals
Mice were anesthetized and inoculated intranasally with 30 μl PBS containing 30,000 U carrier-free recombinant mouse IFN-β (PBL Interferon Source, LOT#6450). Control animals received 30 μl of PBS. 6 h post-treatment animals were euthanized and total RNA was isolated from the lungs.
Statistics
Data analysis, statistical testing and visualization was performed with Prism 6 (GraphPad Software) using Log-rank Mantel-Cox test, Mann-Whitney test, unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test and One-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, as indicted in the figure legends. Medians are depicted as horizontal bars, and means are depicted as horizontal bars ± SEM. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: ns (not significant), P > 0.05, *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Dr Laura Hobley (Queen’s University Belfast, United Kingdom) for the design and construction of the K. pneumoniae O-polysaccharide mutants used herein. We thank Irmgard Fischer for advice in histopathology analysis.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
MI, FNdV and KNP are fellows funded by European Union Seventh Framework Programme Marie Curie Initial Training Networks (FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN) for the project INBIONET under grant agreement PITN-GA-2012-316682. Work in JAB's lab was supported by Marie Curie Career Integration Grant U-KARE (PCIG13-GA-2013-618162); Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC, BB/L007223/1, BB/P006078/1, BB/P020194/1) and Queen’s University Belfast start-up funds. Work in PK's lab was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) grants P27538-B21 and W1261, and by the FWF grant I1621-B22 in the frame of the ERA-Net INFECT-ERA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Munoz-Price LS, Poirel L, Bonomo RA, Schwaber MJ, Daikos GL, Cormican M, et al. Clinical epidemiology of the global expansion of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases. The Lancet infectious diseases. 2013;13(9):785–96. Epub 2013/08/24. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70190-7 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Holt KE, Wertheim H, Zadoks RN, Baker S, Whitehouse CA, Dance D, et al. Genomic analysis of diversity, population structure, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae, an urgent threat to public health. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(27):E3574–81. Epub 2015/06/24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501049112 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen L, Mathema B, Chavda KD, DeLeo FR, Bonomo RA, Kreiswirth BN. Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: molecular and genetic decoding. Trends in microbiology. 2014;22(12):686–96. Epub 2014/10/12. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.09.003 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wyres KL, Holt KE. Klebsiella pneumoniae Population Genomics and Antimicrobial-Resistant Clones. Trends in microbiology. 2016;24(12):944–56. Epub 2016/10/16. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.09.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lery LM, Frangeul L, Tomas A, Passet V, Almeida AS, Bialek-Davenet S, et al. Comparative analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae genomes identifies a phospholipase D family protein as a novel virulence factor. BMC Biol. 2014;12:41 Epub 2014/06/03. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-12-41 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gonzalez-Navajas JM, Lee J, David M, Raz E. Immunomodulatory functions of type I interferons. Nature reviews. 2012;12(2):125–35. Epub 2012/01/10. doi: 10.1038/nri3133 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McNab F, Mayer-Barber K, Sher A, Wack A, O'Garra A. Type I interferons in infectious disease. Nature reviews. 2015;15(2):87–103. Epub 2015/01/24. doi: 10.1038/nri3787 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kovarik P, Castiglia V, Ivin M, Ebner F. Type I Interferons in Bacterial Infections: A Balancing Act. Frontiers in immunology. 2016;7(652):652 Epub 2017/01/14. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00652 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Monroe KM, McWhirter SM, Vance RE. Induction of type I interferons by bacteria. Cellular microbiology. 2010;12(7):881–90. Epub 2010/05/21. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01478.x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Boxx GM, Cheng G. The Roles of Type I Interferon in Bacterial Infection. Cell host & microbe. 2016;19(6):760–9. Epub 2016/06/10. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.05.016 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.LeMessurier KS, Hacker H, Chi L, Tuomanen E, Redecke V. Type I interferon protects against pneumococcal invasive disease by inhibiting bacterial transmigration across the lung. PLoS pathogens. 2013;9(11):e1003727 Epub 2013/11/19. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003727 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maier BB, Hladik A, Lakovits K, Korosec A, Martins R, Kral JB, et al. Type I interferon promotes alveolar epithelial type II cell survival during pulmonary Streptococcus pneumoniae infection and sterile lung injury in mice. European journal of immunology. 2016;46(9):2175–86. Epub 2016/06/18. doi: 10.1002/eji.201546201 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gratz N, Hartweger H, Matt U, Kratochvill F, Janos M, Sigel S, et al. Type I interferon production induced by Streptococcus pyogenes-derived nucleic acids is required for host protection. PLoS pathogens. 2011;7(5):e1001345 Epub 2011/06/01. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001345 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Castiglia V, Piersigilli A, Ebner F, Janos M, Goldmann O, Dambock U, et al. Type I Interferon Signaling Prevents IL-1beta-Driven Lethal Systemic Hyperinflammation during Invasive Bacterial Infection of Soft Tissue. Cell host & microbe. 2016;19(3):375–87. Epub 2016/03/11. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.02.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Naujoks J, Tabeling C, Dill BD, Hoffmann C, Brown AS, Kunze M, et al. IFNs Modify the Proteome of Legionella-Containing Vacuoles and Restrict Infection Via IRG1-Derived Itaconic Acid. PLoS pathogens. 2016;12(2):e1005408 Epub 2016/02/02. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005408 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stanley SA, Johndrow JE, Manzanillo P, Cox JS. The Type I IFN response to infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis requires ESX-1-mediated secretion and contributes to pathogenesis. J Immunol. 2007;178(5):3143–52. Epub 2007/02/22. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Manca C, Tsenova L, Freeman S, Barczak AK, Tovey M, Murray PJ, et al. Hypervirulent M. tuberculosis W/Beijing strains upregulate type I IFNs and increase expression of negative regulators of the Jak-Stat pathway. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2005;25(11):694–701. Epub 2005/12/02. doi: 10.1089/jir.2005.25.694 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mayer-Barber KD, Andrade BB, Barber DL, Hieny S, Feng CG, Caspar P, et al. Innate and adaptive interferons suppress IL-1alpha and IL-1beta production by distinct pulmonary myeloid subsets during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Immunity. 2011;35(6):1023–34. Epub 2011/12/27. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.12.002 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Henry T, Brotcke A, Weiss DS, Thompson LJ, Monack DM. Type I interferon signaling is required for activation of the inflammasome during Francisella infection. J Exp Med. 2007;204(5):987–94. Epub 2007/04/25. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062665 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Henry T, Kirimanjeswara GS, Ruby T, Jones JW, Peng K, Perret M, et al. Type I IFN signaling constrains IL-17A/F secretion by gammadelta T cells during bacterial infections. J Immunol. 2010;184(7):3755–67. Epub 2010/02/24. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902065 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xiong H, Keith JW, Samilo DW, Carter RA, Leiner IM, Pamer EG. Innate Lymphocyte/Ly6C(hi) Monocyte Crosstalk Promotes Klebsiella Pneumoniae Clearance. Cell. 2016;165(3):679–89. Epub 2016/04/05. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.017 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moore TA, Perry ML, Getsoian AG, Newstead MW, Standiford TJ. Divergent role of gamma interferon in a murine model of pulmonary versus systemic Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. Infect Immun. 2002;70(11):6310–8. Epub 2002/10/16. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.11.6310-6318.2002 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Happel KI, Dubin PJ, Zheng M, Ghilardi N, Lockhart C, Quinton LJ, et al. Divergent roles of IL-23 and IL-12 in host defense against Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Exp Med. 2005;202(6):761–9. Epub 2005/09/15. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050193 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mizgerd JP, Skerrett SJ. Animal models of human pneumonia. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008;294(3):L387–98. Epub 2007/12/29. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00330.2007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lawlor MS, Hsu J, Rick PD, Miller VL. Identification of Klebsiella pneumoniae virulence determinants using an intranasal infection model. Molecular microbiology. 2005;58(4):1054–73. Epub 2005/11/03. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04918.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell. 2010;140(6):805–20. Epub 2010/03/23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wieland CW, van Lieshout MH, Hoogendijk AJ, van der Poll T. Host defence during Klebsiella pneumonia relies on haematopoietic-expressed Toll-like receptors 4 and 2. The European respiratory journal. 2011;37(4):848–57. Epub 2010/07/24. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00076510 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bhan U, Ballinger MN, Zeng X, Newstead MJ, Cornicelli MD, Standiford TJ. Cooperative interactions between TLR4 and TLR9 regulate interleukin 23 and 17 production in a murine model of gram negative bacterial pneumonia. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(3):e9896 Epub 2010/04/03. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009896 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tomas A, Lery L, Regueiro V, Perez-Gutierrez C, Martinez V, Moranta D, et al. Functional Genomic Screen Identifies Klebsiella pneumoniae Factors Implicated in Blocking Nuclear Factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) Signaling. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(27):16678–97. Epub 2015/05/15. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.621292 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.March C, Moranta D, Regueiro V, Llobet E, Tomas A, Garmendia J, et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae outer membrane protein A is required to prevent the activation of airway epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(12):9956–67. Epub 2011/02/01. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.181008 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Regueiro V, Moranta D, Campos MA, Margareto J, Garmendia J, Bengoechea JA. Klebsiella pneumoniae increases the levels of Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in human airway epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 2009;77(2):714–24. Epub 2008/11/19. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00852-08 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yang FL, Yang YL, Liao PC, Chou JC, Tsai KC, Yang AS, et al. Structure and immunological characterization of the capsular polysaccharide of a pyrogenic liver abscess caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae: activation of macrophages through Toll-like receptor 4. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(24):21041–51. Epub 2011/04/12. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.222091 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zeng X, Moore TA, Newstead MW, Deng JC, Kunkel SL, Luster AD, et al. Interferon-inducible protein 10, but not monokine induced by gamma interferon, promotes protective type 1 immunity in murine Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia. Infect Immun. 2005;73(12):8226–36. Epub 2005/11/22. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.12.8226-8236.2005 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xu X, Weiss ID, Zhang HH, Singh SP, Wynn TA, Wilson MS, et al. Conventional NK cells can produce IL-22 and promote host defense in Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia. J Immunol. 2014;192(4):1778–86. Epub 2014/01/21. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300039 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hayes MP, Wang J, Norcross MA. Regulation of interleukin-12 expression in human monocytes: selective priming by interferon-gamma of lipopolysaccharide-inducible p35 and p40 genes. Blood. 1995;86(2):646–50. Epub 1995/07/15. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu M, Guo S, Hibbert JM, Jain V, Singh N, Wilson NO, et al. CXCL10/IP-10 in infectious diseases pathogenesis and potential therapeutic implications. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2011;22(3):121–30. Epub 2011/08/02. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2011.06.001 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nathan CF, Murray HW, Wiebe ME, Rubin BY. Identification of interferon-gamma as the lymphokine that activates human macrophage oxidative metabolism and antimicrobial activity. J Exp Med. 1983;158(3):670–89. Epub 1983/09/01. 6411853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Caton ML, Smith-Raska MR, Reizis B. Notch-RBP-J signaling controls the homeostasis of CD8- dendritic cells in the spleen. J Exp Med. 2007;204(7):1653–64. Epub 2007/06/27. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062648 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bennett CL, Clausen BE. DC ablation in mice: promises, pitfalls, and challenges. Trends in immunology. 2007;28(12):519–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jamieson AM, Pasman L, Yu S, Gamradt P, Homer RJ, Decker T, et al. Role of tissue protection in lethal respiratory viral-bacterial coinfection. Science. 2013;340(6137):1230–4. Epub 2013/04/27. doi: 10.1126/science.1233632 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gamradt P, Xu Y, Gratz N, Duncan K, Kobzik L, Hogler S, et al. The Influence of Programmed Cell Death in Myeloid Cells on Host Resilience to Infection with Legionella pneumophila or Streptococcus pyogenes. PLoS pathogens. 2016;12(12):e1006032 Epub 2016/12/16. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006032 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kagan JC, Su T, Horng T, Chow A, Akira S, Medzhitov R. TRAM couples endocytosis of Toll-like receptor 4 to the induction of interferon-beta. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(4):361–8. Epub 2008/02/26. doi: 10.1038/ni1569 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Quinton LJ, Mizgerd JP. Dynamics of lung defense in pneumonia: resistance, resilience, and remodeling. Annual review of physiology. 2015;77:407–30. Epub 2014/08/26. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021014-071937 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kim BH, Chee JD, Bradfield CJ, Park ES, Kumar P, MacMicking JD. Interferon-induced guanylate-binding proteins in inflammasome activation and host defense. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(5):481–9. Epub 2016/04/20. doi: 10.1038/ni.3440 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Su X, Yu Y, Zhong Y, Giannopoulou EG, Hu X, Liu H, et al. Interferon-gamma regulates cellular metabolism and mRNA translation to potentiate macrophage activation. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(8):838–49. Epub 2015/07/07. doi: 10.1038/ni.3205 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cano V, March C, Insua JL, Aguilo N, Llobet E, Moranta D, et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae survives within macrophages by avoiding delivery to lysosomes. Cellular microbiology. 2015;17(11):1537–60. Epub 2015/06/06. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12466 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rivera A, Siracusa MC, Yap GS, Gause WC. Innate cell communication kick-starts pathogen-specific immunity. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(4):356–63. Epub 2016/03/24. doi: 10.1038/ni.3375 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mack EA, Kallal LE, Demers DA, Biron CA. Type 1 interferon induction of natural killer cell gamma interferon production for defense during lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection. MBio. 2011;2(4). Epub 2011/08/11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00169-11 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Martinez J, Huang X, Yang Y. Direct action of type I IFN on NK cells is required for their activation in response to vaccinia viral infection in vivo. J Immunol. 2008;180(3):1592–7. Epub 2008/01/23. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Miyagi T, Gil MP, Wang X, Louten J, Chu WM, Biron CA. High basal STAT4 balanced by STAT1 induction to control type 1 interferon effects in natural killer cells. J Exp Med. 2007;204(10):2383–96. Epub 2007/09/12. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070401 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nguyen KB, Watford WT, Salomon R, Hofmann SR, Pien GC, Morinobu A, et al. Critical role for STAT4 activation by type 1 interferons in the interferon-gamma response to viral infection. Science. 2002;297(5589):2063–6. Epub 2002/09/21. doi: 10.1126/science.1074900 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Martinez J, Huang X, Yang Y. Direct TLR2 signaling is critical for NK cell activation and function in response to vaccinia viral infection. PLoS pathogens. 2010;6(3):e1000811 Epub 2010/03/20. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000811 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Eriksson M, Meadows SK, Basu S, Mselle TF, Wira CR, Sentman CL. TLRs mediate IFN-gamma production by human uterine NK cells in endometrium. J Immunol. 2006;176(10):6219–24. Epub 2006/05/04. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lucas M, Schachterle W, Oberle K, Aichele P, Diefenbach A. Dendritic cells prime natural killer cells by trans-presenting interleukin 15. Immunity. 2007;26(4):503–17. Epub 2007/04/03. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.03.006 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Vitenshtein A, Charpak-Amikam Y, Yamin R, Bauman Y, Isaacson B, Stein N, et al. NK Cell Recognition of Candida glabrata through Binding of NKp46 and NCR1 to Fungal Ligands Epa1, Epa6, and Epa7. Cell host & microbe. 2016;20(4):527–34. Epub 2016/10/14. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.008 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chaushu S, Wilensky A, Gur C, Shapira L, Elboim M, Halftek G, et al. Direct recognition of Fusobacterium nucleatum by the NK cell natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp46 aggravates periodontal disease. PLoS pathogens. 2012;8(3):e1002601 Epub 2012/03/30. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002601 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.van Lieshout MH, Florquin S, Van't Veer C, de Vos AF, van der Poll T. TIR-Domain-Containing Adaptor-Inducing Interferon-beta (TRIF) Mediates Antibacterial Defense during Gram-Negative Pneumonia by Inducing Interferon-x03B3. J Innate Immun. 2015;7(6):637–46. Epub 2015/06/13. doi: 10.1159/000430913 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Isaacs A, Lindenmann J. Virus interference. I. The interferon. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1957;147(927):258–67. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Katze MG, He Y, Gale M, Jr. Viruses and interferon: a fight for supremacy. Nature reviews. 2002;2(9):675–87. Epub 2002/09/05. doi: 10.1038/nri888 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Pedraza S, Lezana JL, Samarina A, Aldana R, Herrera MT, Boisson-Dupuis S, et al. Clinical disease caused by Klebsiella in 2 unrelated patients with interleukin 12 receptor beta1 deficiency. Pediatrics. 2010;126(4):e971–6. Epub 2010/09/22. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2504 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Muller U, Steinhoff U, Reis LF, Hemmi S, Pavlovic J, Zinkernagel RM, et al. Functional role of type I and type II interferons in antiviral defense. Science. 1994;264(5167):1918–21. Epub 1994/06/24. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kamphuis E, Junt T, Waibler Z, Forster R, Kalinke U. Type I interferons directly regulate lymphocyte recirculation and cause transient blood lymphopenia. Blood. 2006;108(10):3253–61. Epub 2006/07/27. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-06-027599 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Passegue E, Wagner EF, Weissman IL. JunB deficiency leads to a myeloproliferative disorder arising from hematopoietic stem cells. Cell. 2004;119(3):431–43. Epub 2004/10/28. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.010 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Clausen BE, Burkhardt C, Reith W, Renkawitz R, Forster I. Conditional gene targeting in macrophages and granulocytes using LysMcre mice. Transgenic Res. 1999;8(4):265–77. Epub 2000/01/06. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Brisse S, Fevre C, Passet V, Issenhuth-Jeanjean S, Tournebize R, Diancourt L, et al. Virulent clones of Klebsiella pneumoniae: identification and evolutionary scenario based on genomic and phenotypic characterization. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(3):e4982 Epub 2009/03/26. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004982 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Llobet E, Tomas JM, Bengoechea JA. Capsule polysaccharide is a bacterial decoy for antimicrobial peptides. Microbiology (Reading, England). 2008;154(Pt 12):3877–86. Epub 2008/12/03. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2008/022301-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Koplin R, Brisson JR, Whitfield C. UDP-galactofuranose precursor required for formation of the lipopolysaccharide O antigen of Klebsiella pneumoniae serotype O1 is synthesized by the product of the rfbDKPO1 gene. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(7):4121–8. Epub 1997/02/14. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.