Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Hematol. 2017 Sep 28;92(12):1333–1339. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24906

A Clinically Meaningful Fetal Hemoglobin Threshold for Children with Sickle Cell Anemia During Hydroxyurea Therapy

Jeremie H Estepp 1,2, Matthew P Smeltzer 3, Guolian Kang 4, Chen Li 4, Winfred C Wang 1, Christina Abrams 5, Banu Aygun 6, Russell E Ware 7, Kerri Nottage 8, Jane S Hankins 1
PMCID: PMC5675769  NIHMSID: NIHMS916521  PMID: 28913922

Abstract

Hydroxyurea has proven clinical benefits and is recommended to be offered to all children with sickle cell anemia (SCA), but the optimal dosing regimen remains controversial. Induction of red blood cell fetal hemoglobin (HbF) by hydroxyurea appears to be dose-dependent. However, it is unknown whether maximizing HbF% improves clinical outcomes. HUSTLE (NCT00305175) is a prospective observational study with a primary goal of describing the long-term clinical effects of hydroxyurea escalated to maximal tolerated dose (MTD) in children with SCA. In 230 children, providing 610 patient-years of follow up, the mean attained HbF% at MTD was >20% for up to 4 years of follow-up. When HbF% values were ≤20%, children had twice the odds of hospitalization for any reason (p<0.0001), including vaso-occlusive pain (p<0.01) and acute chest syndrome (ACS) (p<0.01), and more than four times the odds of admission for fever (p<0.001). Thirty day readmission rates were not affected by HbF%. Neutropenia (ANC <1,000×106/L) was rare (2.3% of all laboratory monitoring), transient, and benign. Therefore, attaining HbF >20% was associated with fewer hospitalizations without significant toxicity. These data support the use of hydroxyurea in children, and suggest that the preferred dosing strategy is one that targets a HbF endpoint >20%.

Keywords: sickle cell disease, hospitalization, 30-day readmission, fetal hemoglobin

Introduction

Sickle cell anemia (SCA; HbSS and HbSβ0thalassemia) is a chronic and debilitating disease associated with recurrent acute vaso-occlusive complications, progressive organ damage and early mortality1. The pathophysiology of SCA originates from a missense mutation (p.Glu6Val) in the HBB gene, which produces a mutant sickle hemoglobin (HbS, α2βs2) that undergoes rapid intracellular polymerization upon deoxygenation. Fetal hemoglobin (HbF, α2γ2) dilutes HbS and does not participate in polymer formation2. In natural history studies, higher HbF% is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality1,35.

Hydroxyurea therapy is recommended to be offered to all children with SCA beginning at 9 months of age, independent of disease severity6 because it safely reduces the incidence of acute vaso-occlusive complications5,79, transfusion requirements8, hospitalizations8, and it potentially improves overall mortality1012. Hydroxyurea is a well-tolerated, once-daily medication with excellent oral bioavailability13 that can be administered to children as liquid or in capsules. Hydroxyurea weight-based dosing schemes provide consistent drug exposure in children14. Although hydroxyurea has multiple potential beneficial effects8,15,16, the primary mechanism of action is induction of HbF6, which is required for clinical benefit17 and appears to be dose-dependent7,9,18.

Despite the proven laboratory and clinical benefits, the optimal dosing strategy of hydroxyurea therapy remains controversial. In murine models19 and natural history studies of patients not on hydroxyurea20,21, a “threshold” HbF value of >20% has been suggested as a protective level for sickle cell-related morbidity. Nevertheless, few (~10–12%) individuals with SCA have HbF% of >20%5,21,22 without receiving therapy. It is uncertain if having an HbF >20% during hydroxyurea therapy will translate to better clinical outcomes in children with SCA. In this analysis of the HUSTLE cohort, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between HbF% and acute clinical outcomes in a cohort of children with SCA treated with hydroxyurea.

Methods

Population

The Hydroxyurea Study of Long-Term Effects (HUSTLE, NCT00305175) is a prospective, observational study designed to describe the long-term clinical effects of hydroxyurea therapy in children with SCA. This analysis is composed of all children (<19 years of age) with SCA (HbSS/HbSβ0 thalassemia) who initiated hydroxyurea (New Cohort, n=136) or had started hydroxyurea prior to study entry (Old Cohort, n=94). In the New Cohort, hydroxyurea dosing began at 20 mg/kg per day and increased in 5 mg/kg increments every 8–12 weeks to MTD, defined by an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 2,000–4,000 ×106/L or the presence of hematologic toxicity23. The maximum absolute dose was 35 mg/kg/day or 2000 mg/day (whichever was achieved first). The HUSTLE study was approved by the IRB at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital (St. Jude), and all participants (or their legal guardians) signed informed consent prior to study procedures.

Clinical Infrastructure and Management

Children with SCA treated at St. Jude were followed by a multidisciplinary staff trained to provide comprehensive care including physicians, nurses, nurse case managers, social workers, psychologists, child life specialists, nutritionists, pharmacists, and advanced practitioners (nurse practitioners and physician assistants). Study participants were evaluated every 4–6 weeks during escalation of therapy and every 8–12 weeks upon achievement of MTD. Evaluations included a physical exam, history, complete blood count with differential, and HbF% quantification via high-performance liquid chromatography. Variables of interests for this analysis were classic SCA-related complications 24 and SCA-nonrelated events leading to hospitalization, such as fever (T >38.5°C), or pre-sedation management for an elective surgical procedure. Criteria for hospitalization with fever included young age (<6 months), temperature ≥40°C, toxic appearance, hemodynamic instability, history of pneumococcal sepsis, white blood cell count of >30.0 or <5.0 ×106/L, or a concern for non-compliance with clinical follow-up or adherence to medications. Pre-sedation management guidelines followed institutional guidelines as described in the supplemental materials.

Medication Possession Ratio (MPR)

Medication adherence was estimated with the medication possession ratio (MPR), which was calculated as [(days medication in family’s possession ÷ days prescribed medication) × 100]25. Consistent with previously published studies on medication adherence26,27, an MPR ≥80% was defined as a surrogate for good adherence. This level has been associated with improved laboratory and clinical outcomes with hydroxyurea therapy28,29. Extremely accurate tracking of pharmacy refills was possible because all prescriptions were dispensed from a centralized pharmacy at St. Jude (at no cost to the patient and regardless of insurance status).

Data Collection

Demographics, hydroxyurea treatment history (start date, date MTD attained, MTD dose), HbF% and hospitalization data were abstracted for up to 4 years following study entry. Dates of hospitalizations and admission diagnoses were abstracted from institutional databases, and only the primary discharge diagnosis was considered for analysis. Dates of readmission within 30 days were recorded.

Statistical Analyses

The characteristics of participants and hospitalizations were summarized using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Continuous variables are reported as median and interquartile range (IQR) or mean and standard deviation (SD). We censored the follow-up period for a maximum of 4 years due to sparse data past 4 years. To account for fluctuations in HbF% over time due to escalation of therapy, oscillating adherence or other factors, the observational period was divided into consecutive 3-month intervals with a maximum of 16 intervals. The HbF% level closest to the beginning of each 3-month interval was used as the representative value for the entire interval.

The association between HbF% and hospitalization was evaluated by four methodologies in all children who initiated hydroxyurea therapy. First (model #1), hospitalizations and HbF% during each interval were modeled with a generalized estimating equation (GEE) to determine if HbF% was associated with the probability of hospitalization, while controlling for treatment duration and intra-participant correlation. In Model #1, HbF% and time were continuous explanatory variables and hospitalization was the categorical response variable. In Model #2, HbF% was categorized into 2 groups (≤20% and >20) and the GEE model was utilized to calculate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for hospitalization within each HbF% category during each interval. In Model #3, HbF% was categorized into 4 groups (<15%, 15 to ≤20%, >20 to ≤25%, and >25%). In Model #4, patient-years above and below the 20% HbF threshold (≤20% and >20%) were calculated and the total number of hospitalizations per patient-year for each group reported.

The percentages of time intervals with moderate (ANC <1,000 ×106/L) and severe (ANC <500 ×106/L) neutropenia were calculated when HbF% was ≤20% and >20%. The association between neutropenia and HbF% was evaluated utilizing a GEE model with HbF% as a categorical variable (≤20% and >20%) during intervals of neutropenia.

The association between readmission to the hospital and HbF% (≤20% and >20%) was evaluated for hospitalizations within 30 days of a previous discharge utilizing the GEE model. Analyses were performed in SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Study Population

In total, 230 children with HbSS (n=214; 93%) or HbSβ0thalassemia (n=16; 7%) were enrolled from March 7, 2006 through November 11, 2013. The participant population included 132 (57.4%) males. The mean age (±1 standard deviation [SD]) of participants when hydroxyurea was initiated was 7.8 (4.6) years, with a median age of 7.4 years and a range from 6 months to 17.9 years (Table 1). The mean (SD) of HbF% at enrollment was 9.7% (6.6), with a median HbF% of 7.9% and a range of 1.0–32.9%. The mean (SD) daily dose of hydroxyurea at MTD was 26.7 (4.7) mg/kg/day, with a median dose of 28.0 mg/kg/day and range of 13.0 to 35.0 mg/kg/day. At the time the data were censored, 75.2% (173/230) of participants had attained MTD (Table 2).

Table 1.

Demographics and hospitalizations

Total 230
Gender, n(%)
 male 132 (57.4)
 female 98 (42.6)
Genotype, n(%)
 HbSS 214 (93.0)
 HbSB0thal 16 (7.0)
Hospitalizations
 Total 521
 Vaso-occlusive pain 251 (48.2)
 Acute chest syndrome 77 (14.8)
 Fever* 73 (14.0)
 Other** 120 (21.7)
*

Includes aplastic crisis (n=3) and pneumococcal infection (n=1);

**

Pre-sedation management (n=113), splenic sequestration (n=3), priapism (n=4).

Table 2.

Sustained hematologic effects of hydroxyurea therapy following achieving MTD for children with SCA

No. of participants MTD
n=173
1 year
n=143
2 years
n=121
3 years
n=105
4 years
n=92
Laboratory Parameters
 HbF (%) 21.7(16.2–27.8) 22.1(17.9–28.1) 21.5(14.7–27.5) 20.6(14.6–25.8) 21.5(15.5–24.9)
 Hb (g/dL) 9.2(8.4–10.1) 9.4(8.6–10.1) 9.3(8.5–10.1) 9.3(8.7–10.2) 9.2(8.6—10.0)
 MCV (fL) 102.6 (96.9–110.6) 105.0(98.3–112.5) 104.4(96.0–113.0) 107.1(98.2–113.3) 107.7(98.5–116.4)
 ARC (×109/L) 131(103–171) 129(98–187) 145(103–188) 137(112–207) 136(107–178)
 WBC (×109/L) 8.2(6.4–9.6) 7.9(6.1–9.6) 8.1(6.2–9.9) 8.1(5.8–9.9) 7.3(6.0–8.4)
 ANC (×106/L) 3400(2700—4300) 3600(2400—4600) 3650(2700—5000) 3600(2900—5400) 3300(2400—4100)
 PLT (×109/L) 359(260—440) 345(275—437) 357(268—494) 340(259—460) 361(255—485)
Age Parameters
 Average, y 7.7(4.1–11.6) 8.8(5.1–12.9) 9.6(6.3–13.3) 10.5(7.4–13.8) 11.4(8.3–14.1)
 <5 years (n) 57 34 7 1 1
 5–12 years (n) 74 65 75 68 54
 >12 years (n) 42 44 39 36 37

Laboratory values are expressed as median (interquartile range). MTD, maximum tolerated dose; SCA, sickle cell anemia; HbF, fetal hemoglobin; Hb, hemoglobin; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; ARC, absolute reticulocyte count; WBC, white blood cell count; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; PLT, platelet count. Compared to laboratory value at MTD, MCV at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were significantly higher (P-value <0.01; Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests) and WBC at 1 and 4 years were significantly lower (P-value <0.01; Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests). There were no other statistically significant changes in hematologic parameters compared to MTD for subsequent year-to-year comparisons.

Hydroxyurea Adherence

In total, 10,637 hydroxyurea prescriptions (6,547 as capsules and 4,090 as liquid suspension) were dispensed for a mean of 27.3 (6.3) days, with a median (IQR, range) duration of 30 (28–30, 1–60) days. Complete medication dispensation records were available for 96% (220/230) of participants. Children were in possession of hydroxyurea (MPR) a mean (SD) of 93.6% (±17.8%) of the time during the observational period.

Laboratory Effect of Hydroxyurea Therapy Escalated to MTD

Effects on laboratory parameters with hydroxyurea escalated to MTD are summarized in Table 2. At MTD, the mean ANC was 3600 (1400) ×106/L with a median (IQR) of 3400 (2700–4300) ×106/L, and the mean (SD) absolute reticulocyte count (ARC) was 144 (73) ×109/L with a median (IQR) of 131 (103–171) ×109/L. Hydroxyurea at MTD resulted in a mean (SD) HbF of 26.7% (8.4%) with a median (IQR) of 21.7% (16.2–27.8%). Compared to laboratory parameters at MTD, HbF, hemoglobin (Hb), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), ARC, ANC and platelet counts were maintained and not significantly altered following 1, 2, 3 or 4 years of therapy (Table 2).

Hospitalizations

Table 1 summarizes the 521 hospitalizations observed during the study. Participants experienced a mean (SD) of 2.4 (4.5) hospitalizations with a median (range) of 1 (0–43) hospitalizations during the study period, averaging 0.9 hospitalizations per patient-year. The distribution of hospitalizations per participant is provided in Figure S1.

The most common reasons for sickle cell-related admission were vaso-occlusive pain (n=251; 48.2%) and ACS (n=77; 14.8%), with 4 children admitted due to priapism, 3 for splenic sequestration and 1 for pneumococcal sepsis. The clinical events leading to hospitalization that were not directly related to SCA were fever (n=73; 14%) and pre-sedation management (n=113; 21.7%).

Fetal Hemoglobin and Hospitalizations

We used four different statistical modeling approaches to determine whether HbF% correlated with SCA-related hospitalizations in patients on hydroxyurea. In Model #1, a significant association between HbF% and hospitalization for pain, ACS or any reason was observed. To further explore these associations, the number of observed hospitalizations during intervals when participants’ HbF% was ≤20% was compared to the number when HbF% was >20% (Models #2 and #4). This categorization provided 339 patient-years of follow up when HbF% was ≤20% and 271 patient-years when HbF% was >20%. The odds of being hospitalized for ACS, VOC, fever, or for any reason ranged from 2- to 4-fold higher when HbF% was ≤20%; specifically, the odds ratios (OR) were 2.6 (95% CI: 1.3–5.1) for ACS, 2.2 (95% CI: 1.3–3.8) for VOC, 4.1 (95% CI: 2.0–4.8) for fever, and 2.1 (95% CI: 1.5–3.0) for any reason (Table 3).

Table 3.

Hospitalizations in children with sickle cell anemia treated with HU at MTD stratified by HbF

Model HbF, (%) Patient-Years of Follow Up Hospitalizations per Patient-year Hospitalization Any Reason
OR (95% CI)
p-value Hospitalization VOC or ACS
OR (95% CI)
p-value
#2 ≤20 339 1.14 2.1 (1.5–3.0) <0.0001 2.3 (1.5–4.0) <0.001
>20 271 0.5 1 1

#3 <15 192 1.15 2.1 (1.3–3.3) 0.001 2.1 (1.1–3.9) <0.01
15–20 147 1.13 2.2 (1.3–3.6) 2.1 (1.1–4.0)
>20–25 127 0.53 1.0 (0.6–1.7) 0.8 (0.4–1.7)
>25 143 0.47 1 1

Odds ratios (OR), 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI), and p-values calculated with GEE model controlling for time and intra-participant variation. HbF, Hemoglobin F; VOC, vaso-occlusive crisis; ACS, acute chest syndrome

In Model #3, the numbers of observed hospitalizations during intervals when participants’ HbF% was <15%, 15–20%, >20%–25% and >25% were compared. This categorization provided 192 patient-years with HbF <15%, 147 patient-years with HbF 15–20%, 127 patient-years with HbF 20–25%, and 143 patient years with HbF >25%. The odds of being hospitalized for VOC, ACS or any reason approximated 2-fold higher when HbF% was ≤20%, but it did not increase further if HbF was 15–20% or <15% (Table 3).

Analyses for Models #2 and 3 were repeated utilizing HbF transformed to log(HbF) and similar results were obtained. There was no evidence that time on hydroxyurea therapy, age of enrollment, nor enrollment in the New versus Old cohort were significant confounders of the associations between HbF or log(HbF) and hospitalization (results not shown).

Additional Laboratory Benefits of Hydroxyurea

Abnormalities in white blood cell count (WBC), ANC, Hb, MCV, and ARC improved on hydroxyurea therapy and were stable over 4 years after MTD was attained (Table 2). When these variables were controlled for in Model #2, higher WBC and ANC were significantly associated with a higher probability of hospitalization, but none of the additional laboratory benefits altered the original model significantly (Table 3).

Hospital Readmissions

In total, 41 participants were readmitted on 116 occasions within 30 days of discharge (0.2 readmissions per patient-year). Controlling for time, participants with HbF% ≤20% had a non-significant 1.5 OR (95% CI: 0.7–3.4) for readmission within 30 days compared to those with HbF% >20%.

Dose-Limiting Neutropenia

Moderate neutropenia (ANC <1,000 × 106/L) occurred 55 times in 14% (32/230) of participants and in 2% of all evaluable time intervals. Severe neutropenia (ANC <500 × 106/L) occurred 9 times in 3% (8/230) of participants. Recurrent neutropenia was seen in 12 children. Moderate neutropenia occurred at a similar frequency in intervals when HbF% was ≤20% and >20% (OR 1.1 [95% CI: 0.5–2.1). All episodes were transient, and none were associated with invasive bacterial infections or hospitalization.

Discussion

Previous analyses from the HUSTLE study reported that children receiving hydroxyurea escalated to MTD may have higher levels of HbF, Hb and MCV compared to children treated with lower doses of hydroxyurea30, and that children enrolled on HUSTLE have a low rate of new or worsening cerebrovascular disease31, and improved splenic32 and renal33,34 function. The current analysis of the HUSTLE study provides new critical clinical information regarding the optimal HbF% target during hydroxyurea therapy in children with SCA. Overall, hydroxyurea therapy escalated to MTD was safe and resulted in stable improvement in laboratory parameters. After MTD was attained, the average HbF exceeded 20% for up to 4 years. Compared to when HbF was ≤20%, highly elevated HbF (>20%) was associated with fewer acute sickle cell related-hospitalizations and hospitalizations for any reason.

When children with SCA are treated with ~20 mg/kg/day of hydroxyurea, the average HbF is ~15%, and they experience an average of 1.3 hospitalizations per patient-year35,36. In the HUSTLE study, hydroxyurea was escalated to MTD. The average daily dose was 27 mg/kg/day and children had an average HbF of 21.7% at MTD for up to 4 years (Table 1), which is consistent with previous results in a publication of a smaller population of children9. In the HUSTLE cohort, during intervals when HbF% were >20%, the odds of being hospitalized were 2- to 4-fold lower with children experiencing 0.5 hospitalizations per patient year. A trend toward fewer hospitalizations was noted when HbF% was >25% compared to the 20–25% (Table 2), but this relationship was not statistically significant. One possible explanation for the lack of significance is the relationship between overall HbF% and the fraction of F-cells (erythrocytes that stain for HbF), which may be the most critical factor for ameliorating SCD complications20. While any increase in HbF% increases F-cells and would be theoretically beneficial37, the relationship is logarithmic, and not linear38. Marcus et al.39, suggested a rise in HbF% from 2% at baseline to 13% during hydroxyurea therapy would raise F-cells from 20% to 70%; however, an increase in HbF% from 10% to 21% would result in a smaller increase in F-cells, from 60% to 80%. According to this model, the rate of F-cell increase declines as HbF% levels approach 20%, translating to smaller increments in clinical benefits as HbF% continues to rise. It is possible that hospitalization is not a sensitive enough measure of disease severity to delineate an additional benefit from HbF% >25% versus 20–25%, or that there is no increase in benefit. This relationship needs to be explored further in future trials.

In a benchmark study for individuals with SCA40, the 30-day re-admission rate was 12.8% (95% CI: 12.0–13.6%) in children 1–9 years of age and 23.4% (95% CI:22.5–24.3%) in children 10–17 years of age. In HUSTLE, the 30-day re-admission rate was comparable at 19% and was not associated with HbF levels. It is notable that individuals with chronic pain syndromes could not be reliably identified within the HUSTLE cohort, and re-admissions rates may be influenced by this subset of participants.

Further work is needed to identify children who are treated with hydroxyurea escalated to MTD and continue to experience recurrent hospitalizations. They underscore the need for novel therapies to augment the effect of hydroxyurea in increasing HbF% to treat acute vaso-occlusive complications41 and novel anti-sickling agents42.

The odds of being admitted to the hospital for fever when HbF was ≤20% was 4 times higher compared to when HbF% was >20%. This association may be explained by potential anti-inflammatory effects of hydroxyurea43, either related to or independent of HbF% induction. However, because not all febrile events (those not leading to a hospitalization) were captured and clinician-induced selection bias (e.g., the “less adherent subset of patients” admitted due to clinician concern for poor adherence potentially reducing outpatient follow up) could have played a role, we cannot assume causality.

Hydroxyurea has proposed clinical benefits through HbF-independent mechanisms, including: a reduced production of neutrophils and reticulocytes, improved rheology, reduced hemolysis, and release of nitric oxide44. A reduction of WBC and ANC did favorably influence the odds of hospitalization, but HbF level was the dominant variable supporting this effect. No significant association was seen between ARC, MCV or Hb levels and the odds of hospitalization (Table 4).

Table 4.

Effects of hydroxyurea on laboratory parameters other than HbF and their relationship to hospitalization

Model Hospitalization Any Reason
OR (95% CI)
HbF p-value Additional Variable p-value Change in OR from base model (%)
Model #2 2.1 (1.5–3.0) <0.0001 -- --
Model #2 + WBC 1.8 (1.2–2.6) <0.002 <0.001 14.3%
Model #2 + ANC 1.9 (1.3–2.8) <0.001 <0.005 9.5%
Model #2 + Hb 2.1 (1.4–3.1) <0.001 0.89 --
Model #2 + MCV 2.0 (1.3–2.9) <0.001 0.20 --
Model #2 + ARC 2.2 (1.5–3.3) <0.001 0.33 --

Odds ratios (OR), 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI), and p-values calculated with GEE model controlling for time and intra-participant variation. HbF, fetal hemoglobin; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; WBC, white blood cell count; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; ARC, absolute reticulocyte count

While this study provides important and novel information regarding the use of hydroxyurea in children, some limitations should be noted. First, few children <5 years of age when enrolled had long-term follow up data available at the time of censure (Table 2). Very young children have high baseline levels of endogenous HbF, with average HbF levels dropping below 20% at around 18 months of age and stabilizing around 5 years of age45. Extrapolation of our findings to this young cohort should be viewed with caution. The recently NIH-funded HUG KISS pilot (NCT03020615) study is a multicenter trial designed to evaluate the feasibility of randomizing young children to either a low fixed-dose of hydroxyurea (20 mg/kg/day) versus escalation to MTD. HUG KISS will help to elucidate the clinical benefit of therapeutically elevated HbF in young children. A second inherent limitation is that MPR may overestimate drug adherence (i.e., prescriptions are filled, but medication is not actually taken). In our study, we were not able to distinguish between poor responses to hydroxyurea and non-adherence. However, HbF induction is stable over time with continued adherence7,9 and trends can be used as a surrogate marker of adherence29. In this study, the average HbF level >20% were maintained for up to 4 years. Finally, F-cell enumeration was not available for HUSTLE participants.

In summary, this prospective observational study shows that most children with SCA treated with hydroxyurea, can safely achieve and maintain HbF levels over 20% when adherent to therapy and escalated to MTD. During intervals with HbF levels >20%, children have dramatically fewer SCA-related complications requiring hospitalization. These data support a dosing strategy for hydroxyurea that produces HbF levels above 20% to decrease hospitalizations in children with SCA, with this value serving as clinically meaningful endpoint for future trials and clinical practice.

Supplementary Material

Supp info

Acknowledgments

The HUSTLE trial was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute through grant R01 HL-0990941 (REW) and the analysis of this project was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute through grant R34 HL-127162 (JHE). The authors would like to thank all staff at St. Jude for their support throughout the study, especially Vanessa Howard, FNP, Nicole Dockery, CPNP, Melissa Lee, PA-C and Jola Dowdy, CRA. We acknowledge Terri Davis for her assistance with text formatting. Finally, we especially recognize the eager participation and time commitments made by the children and families who enrolled in this study.

Footnotes

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00305175

Contributions

JHE developed the concept, designed the analysis, analyzed the results, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. GK, CA, MPS and CL performed the data management and statistical analyses for the trial. JHE, JSH, WCW, MJW, BA, REW, and KN enrolled patients, collected data, and helped interpret results. JHE, BA, REW and KN supervised the trial. JHE, MPS, GK, CL, WCW, JSH, MJW, CA, BA, REW, and KN provided critique, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict-of-interest disclosures

JHE receives funding support from Pfizer and Eli Lilly and Co and serves as a consultant for Daiichi Sankyo and Global Blood Therapeutics. WCW and JH receive funding support from Global Blood Therapeutics. REW is a consultant for Bayer Pharmaceuticals and Global Blood Therapeutics; receives research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Addmedica, and Biomedomics Inc; and serves on a Data and Safety Monitoring Board for Eli Lilly. KN is now employed by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The other authors declare no competing financial interests.

Reference List

  • 1.Platt OS, Brambilla DJ, Rosse WF, et al. Mortality in sickle cell disease. Life expectancy and risk factors for early death. The New England journal of medicine. 1994;330(23):1639–1644. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199406093302303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Akinsheye I, Alsultan A, Solovieff N, et al. Fetal hemoglobin in sickle cell anemia. Blood. 2011;118(1):19–27. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-03-325258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Leikin SL, Gallagher D, Kinney TR, Sloane D, Klug P, Rida W. Mortality in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease. Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease. Pediatrics. 1989;84(3):500–508. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stevens MC, Hayes RJ, Vaidya S, Serjeant GR. Fetal hemoglobin and clinical severity of homozygous sickle cell disease in early childhood. The Journal of pediatrics. 1981;98(1):37–41. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(81)80529-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Platt OS, Thorington BD, Brambilla DJ, et al. Pain in sickle cell disease. Rates and risk factors. The New England journal of medicine. 1991;325(1):11–16. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199107043250103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yawn BP, Buchanan GR, Afenyi-Annan AN, et al. Management of sickle cell disease: summary of the 2014 evidence-based report by expert panel members. Jama. 2014;312(10):1033–1048. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.10517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hankins JS, Ware RE, Rogers ZR, et al. Long-term hydroxyurea therapy for infants with sickle cell anemia: the HUSOFT extension study. Blood. 2005;106(7):2269–2275. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang WC, Ware RE, Miller ST, et al. Hydroxycarbamide in very young children with sickle-cell anaemia: a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial (BABY HUG) Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1663–1672. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60355-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zimmerman SA, Schultz WH, Davis JS, et al. Sustained long-term hematologic efficacy of hydroxyurea at maximum tolerated dose in children with sickle cell disease. Blood. 2004;103(6):2039–2045. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-07-2475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lobo CL, Pinto JF, Nascimento EM, Moura PG, Cardoso GP, Hankins JS. The effect of hydroxcarbamide therapy on survival of children with sickle cell disease. British journal of haematology. 2013;161(6):852–860. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Steinberg MH, Barton F, Castro O, et al. Effect of hydroxyurea on mortality and morbidity in adult sickle cell anemia: risks and benefits up to 9 years of treatment. Jama. 2003;289(13):1645–1651. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.13.1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Voskaridou E, Christoulas D, Bilalis A, et al. The effect of prolonged administration of hydroxyurea on morbidity and mortality in adult patients with sickle cell syndromes: results of a 17-year, single-center trial (LaSHS) Blood. 2010;115(12):2354–2363. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-221333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wiczling P, Liem RI, Panepinto JA, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of hydroxyurea for children and adolescents with sickle cell disease. Journal of clinical pharmacology. 2014;54(9):1016–1022. doi: 10.1002/jcph.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Estepp JH, Melloni C, Thornburg CD, et al. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of a liquid formulation of hydroxyurea in children with sickle cell anemia. Journal of clinical pharmacology. 2015 doi: 10.1002/jcph.598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Charache S, Terrin ML, Moore RD, et al. Effect of hydroxyurea on the frequency of painful crises in sickle cell anemia. Investigators of the Multicenter Study of Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Anemia. The New England journal of medicine. 1995;332(20):1317–1322. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199505183322001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ware RE, Davis BR, Schultz WH, et al. Hydroxycarbamide versus chronic transfusion for maintenance of transcranial doppler flow velocities in children with sickle cell anaemia-TCD With Transfusions Changing to Hydroxyurea (TWiTCH): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10019):661–670. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01041-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lebensburger JD, Pestina TI, Ware RE, Boyd KL, Persons DA. Hydroxyurea therapy requires HbF induction for clinical benefit in a sickle cell mouse model. Haematologica. 2010;95(9):1599–1603. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.023325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kinney TR, Helms RW, O’Branski EE, et al. Safety of hydroxyurea in children with sickle cell anemia: results of the HUG-KIDS study, a phase I/II trial. Pediatric Hydroxyurea Group. Blood. 1999;94(5):1550–1554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pestina TI, Hargrove PW, Zhao H, et al. Amelioration of murine sickle cell disease by nonablative conditioning and gamma-globin gene-corrected bone marrow cells. Molecular therapy Methods & clinical development. 2015;2:15045. doi: 10.1038/mtm.2015.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Steinberg MH, Chui DH, Dover GJ, Sebastiani P, Alsultan A. Fetal hemoglobin in sickle cell anemia: a glass half full? Blood. 2014;123(4):481–485. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-09-528067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Powars DR, Weiss JN, Chan LS, Schroeder WA. Is there a threshold level of fetal hemoglobin that ameliorates morbidity in sickle cell anemia? Blood. 1984;63(4):921–926. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bhatnagar P, Keefer JR, Casella JF, et al. Association between baseline fetal hemoglobin levels and incidence of severe vaso-occlusive pain episodes in children with sickle cell anemia. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2013;60(10):E125–127. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Heeney MM, Ware RE. Hydroxyurea for children with sickle cell disease. Hematology/oncology clinics of North America. 2010;24(1):199–214. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2009.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ballas SK, Lieff S, Benjamin LJ, et al. Definitions of the phenotypic manifestations of sickle cell disease. American journal of hematology. 2010;85(1):6–13. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Andrade SE, Kahler KH, Frech F, Chan KA. Methods for evaluation of medication adherence and persistence using automated databases. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2006;15(8):565–574. doi: 10.1002/pds.1230. discussion 575–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grosset KA, Bone I, Grosset DG. Suboptimal medication adherence in Parkinson’s disease. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2005;20(11):1502–1507. doi: 10.1002/mds.20602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rosen MI, Rigsby MO, Salahi JT, Ryan CE, Cramer JA. Electronic monitoring and counseling to improve medication adherence. Behaviour research and therapy. 2004;42(4):409–422. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00149-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Candrilli SD, O’Brien SH, Ware RE, Nahata MC, Seiber EE, Balkrishnan R. Hydroxyurea adherence and associated outcomes among Medicaid enrollees with sickle cell disease. American journal of hematology. 2011;86(3):273–277. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Estepp JH, Winter B, Johnson M, Smeltzer MP, Howard SC, Hankins JS. Improved hydroxyurea effect with the use of text messaging in children with sickle cell anemia. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2014;61(11):2031–2036. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ware RE, Aygun B. Advances in the use of hydroxyurea. Hematology American Society of Hematology Education Program. 2009:62–69. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2009.1.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nottage KA, Ware RE, Aygun B, et al. Hydroxycarbamide treatment and brain MRI/MRA findings in children with sickle cell anaemia. British journal of haematology. 2016;175(2):331–338. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nottage KA, Ware RE, Winter B, et al. Predictors of splenic function preservation in children with sickle cell anemia treated with hydroxyurea. European journal of haematology. 2014;93(5):377–383. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Aygun B, Mortier NA, Smeltzer MP, Shulkin BL, Hankins JS, Ware RE. Hydroxyurea treatment decreases glomerular hyperfiltration in children with sickle cell anemia. American journal of hematology. 2013;88(2):116–119. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Aygun B, Mortier NA, Smeltzer MP, Hankins JS, Ware RE. Glomerular hyperfiltration and albuminuria in children with sickle cell anemia. Pediatric nephrology. 2011;26(8):1285–1290. doi: 10.1007/s00467-011-1857-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ferster A, Tahriri P, Vermylen C, et al. Five years of experience with hydroxyurea in children and young adults with sickle cell disease. Blood. 2001;97(11):3628–3632. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.11.3628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gulbis B, Haberman D, Dufour D, et al. Hydroxyurea for sickle cell disease in children and for prevention of cerebrovascular events: the Belgian experience. Blood. 2005;105(7):2685–2690. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Steinberg MH, Lu ZH, Barton FB, Terrin ML, Charache S, Dover GJ. Fetal hemoglobin in sickle cell anemia: determinants of response to hydroxyurea. Multicenter Study of Hydroxyurea. Blood. 1997;89(3):1078–1088. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Marcus SJ, Ware RE. Physiologic decline in fetal hemoglobin parameters in infants with sickle cell disease: implications for pharmacological intervention. Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology. 1999;21(5):407–411. doi: 10.1097/00043426-199909000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Marcus SJ, Kinney TR, Schultz WH, O’Branski EE, Ware RE. Quantitative analysis of erythrocytes containing fetal hemoglobin (F cells) in children with sickle cell disease. American journal of hematology. 1997;54(1):40–46. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8652(199701)54:1<40::aid-ajh6>3.0.co;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Brousseau DC, Owens PL, Mosso AL, Panepinto JA, Steiner CA. Acute care utilization and rehospitalizations for sickle cell disease. Jama. 2010;303(13):1288–1294. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ataga KI, Kutlar A, Kanter J, et al. Crizanlizumab for the Prevention of Pain Crises in Sickle Cell Disease. The New England journal of medicine. 2017;376(5):429–439. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Oder E, Safo MK, Abdulmalik O, Kato GJ. New developments in anti-sickling agents: can drugs directly prevent the polymerization of sickle haemoglobin in vivo? British journal of haematology. 2016;175(1):24–30. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Almeida CB, Souza LE, Leonardo FC, Costa FT, Werneck CC, Covas DT, Costa FF, Conran N. Acute hemolytic vascular inflammatory process are prevented by nitric oxide replacement or a single dose of hydroxyurea. Blood. 2017;126(6):711–720. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-12-616250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ware RE. How I use hydroxyurea to treat young patients with sickle cell anemia. Blood. 2010;115(26):5300–5311. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-04-146852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brown AK, Sleeper LA, Miller ST, Pegelow CH, Gill FM, Waclawiw MA. Reference values and hematologic changes from birth to 5 years in patients with sickle cell disease. Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 1994;148(8):796–804. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1994.02170080026005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp info

RESOURCES