Abstract
Topological insulators with spin-momentum-locked topological surface states are expected to exhibit a giant spin-orbit torque in the topological insulator/ferromagnet systems. To date, the topological insulator spin-orbit torque-driven magnetization switching is solely reported in a Cr-doped topological insulator at 1.9 K. Here we directly show giant spin-orbit torque-driven magnetization switching in a Bi2Se3/NiFe heterostructure at room temperature captured using a magneto-optic Kerr effect microscope. We identify a large charge-to-spin conversion efficiency of ~1–1.75 in the thin Bi2Se3 films, where the topological surface states are dominant. In addition, we find the current density required for the magnetization switching is extremely low, ~6 × 105 A cm–2, which is one to two orders of magnitude smaller than that with heavy metals. Our demonstration of room temperature magnetization switching of a conventional 3d ferromagnet using Bi2Se3 may lead to potential innovations in topological insulator-based spintronic applications.
The application of spin-orbit torque in topological insulator heterostructures is limited only under low temperature. Here, the authors report room temperature magnetization switching in topological insulator-ferromagnet heterostructures by spin-orbit torques.
Introduction
The spin currents generated by charge currents via the spin Hall effect1–4 and/or Rashba-Edelstein effect5,6 can exert spin-orbit torques (SOTs) on the adjacent FM layer and result in the current-induced magnetization switching. A higher charge-to-spin conversion efficiency (referred as SOT efficiency) is crucial for the low-power dissipation SOT applications. Recently, the SOTs have been studied in topological insulators (TIs)7–14, which are an emerging state of quantum matter possessing spin-momentum-locked topological surface states (TSS)15–17. This exotic property is supposed to exhibit a large SOT efficiency, which is explored recently by the spin transport methods such as spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance (ST-FMR)7,8,13, spin pumping9,10,14,18, and spin tunneling spectroscopy19,20. However, in TIs such as Bi2Se3, the bulk states (BS) and two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG), which are typically present due to defects in the bulk and band bending at the surface21,22, respectively, can lead to an inevitable contamination to the SOT effects from TSS. This is indicated by a wide range of the SOT efficiencies of 0.01−3.5 reported in the Bi2Se3/ferromagnet (FM) systems7–9,18. The roles of BS, 2DEG, and TSS on SOT efficiencies have not yet been clearly understood in details, which is critical for highly efficient SOT-driven magnetization switching using TIs.
To date, the magnetization switching induced by TI SOT is solely reported in a Cr-doped TI at a very low temperature (1.9 K) with an external magnetic field11, and the SOT-induced magnetization switching in a TI/3d FM heterostructure at room temperature is highly desired for applications. Here we obtain a TSS dominated SOT effect in 5–8 quintuple layers (QL) of Bi2Se3 films, exhibiting a large SOT efficiency of ~1–1.75 at room temperature using ST-FMR measurements. By taking advantage of the high efficiency, we image the SOT-induced magnetization switching by a magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE) microscope in the Bi2Se3/NiFe (Py) heterostructures at room temperature after injecting a pulsed dc current. The required current density for SOT switching is extremely low and is one to two orders of magnitude smaller than that with heavy metals23–25. Our results suggest that TI/FM heterostructure could be a potential candidate for room temperature spintronic devices with ultralow-power dissipation.
Results
Bi2Se3 growth and film characterization
High-quality Bi2Se3 films ranging from 5 to 20 QL (1 QL ≈ 1 nm) were grown on Al2O3 (0001) substrates using molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) technique (see Methods). Figure 1a shows the atomic-force microscopy (AFM) image of a representative 10-QL Bi2Se3 film, indicating a smooth surface and high film quality. From the four-probe and Hall measurements at room temperature, we find that the resistivity (ρ BiSe) is ~1,000 μΩ cm at large thicknesses (15 and 20 QL), increases at 10 QL and becomes ~4,117 μΩ cm at 5 QL, as shown in Fig. 1b. Moreover, the sheet resistance shows a similar trend as ρ BiSe (Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 2). The sheet carrier concentration (n 2D) shows an opposite trend, decreasing from ~6 × 1013 cm–2 at 20 QL to ~3.8 × 1013 cm–2 below 8 QL. This behavior suggests a small contribution of BS and 2DEG to electrical transport properties in the thin Bi2Se3 cases, as we discuss later. We also characterize Bi2Se3 thickness (t BiSe)-dependent ρ BiSe (Fig. 1c) and n 2D (Fig. 1d) at different temperatures. Our Bi2Se3 films show a typical metallic behavior similar to previous reports8,26.
ST-FMR measurements
Figure 2a shows the schematic diagram of the ST-FMR measurement (see Methods section), an effective technique to evaluate the SOT efficiency7,27. The ST-FMR devices consist of Bi2Se3 (t BiSe)/Co40Fe40B20 (CFB, 7 nm) bilayers. Figure 2b illustrates the current-induced spin polarization and magnetization dynamics in Bi2Se3/CFB bilayers. As an in-plane rf current (I RF) flows in the Bi2Se3 layer, non-equilibrium spins are generated at the Bi2Se3 surfaces denoted by the arrows with green and red balls. These spins from Bi2Se3 top surface diffuse into CFB and exert oscillating damping-like torque (τ DL) and/or a field-like torque (τ FL) on the magnetization. These torques together with rf current-induced Oersted field (H RF) torque (τ Oe) trigger the precession of CFB magnetization and an oscillation of the anisotropic magnetoresistance with the same frequency as I RF. Consequently, a mixing dc voltage V mix (i.e., ST-FMR signal) is produced across the ST-FMR device7,8,27,28.
Figure 2c shows typical ST-FMR signals V mix (open symbols), which are fitted by V mix = V S F S + V A F A, where F S and F A are symmetric and antisymmetric Lorentzian functions, respectively. The amplitudes of symmetric (V S) and antisymmetric component (V A) are attributed to τ DL and τ FL + τ Oe, respectively7,27. By adopting the established analysis method7,8, the SOT efficiency (θ TI = J S/J C) can be evaluated from only V S (Supplementary Note 3), where J S is the spin current density at the Bi2Se3/CFB interface and J C (A cm–2) is the uniform charge current density in the Bi2Se3 layer. Similar measurements and analyses are further performed on devices with various t BiSe spanning 5–20 QL. Figure 3 shows θ TI vs. t BiSe at room temperature. Each data point is averaged from three devices, which show a similar behavior. Specifically, θ TI shows a constant value of ~0.3 for 15 and 20 QL devices, and starts to increase below 10 QL, reaching a maximum of ~1.75 at 5 QL. θ TI in thinner films increases >5 times compared to that in thicker Bi2Se3 devices. From the line shape of the ST-FMR signals and the positive sign of θ TI at different t BiSe, we confirm that the direction of in-plane spin polarization (S ||) at the interface of Bi2Se3 and CFB is in line with TSS where S || is locked at right angles to the electron momentum7,8,29–31.
SOT efficiency vs. Bi2Se3 thickness and the role of TSS
Recent experimental and theoretical works21,32 indicate that as the thickness of Bi2Se3 decreases to several QLs, BS shrink significantly and finally disappear. In addition, the surface 2DEG bands are gradually quantized into discrete subbands enclosed by the linear TSS bands due to quantum confinement effects (Supplementary Fig. 3). Since the thickness of a TSS (t TSS) and 2DEG (t 2DEG) in Bi2Se3 are reported to be ~1 nm21,26,32,33 and ~4 nm21,26,32, respectively, negligible BS are expected when the Bi2Se3 thickness is < 8 QL. Accordingly, we discuss the transports in three regions (I, II, and III, denoted by different colors) in Fig. 3. In region I (t BiSe > 10 QL), there are considerable BS and 2DEG contributions to the transport, which could dilute the TSS8, resulting in a small θ TI. In region II (~10 QL), BS start to shrink, leading to a slight increase of θ TI. In region III (t BiSe ≤ 8 QL), the BS disappear and the contribution from the 2DEG decreases as we discuss later. On the other hand, due to the lack of inversion symmetry in our devices, Rashba splitting states in 2DEG subbands can give rise to S ||. However, the accumulated spins due to the Rashba states are expected to have an opposite helicity (i.e., negative θ TI) compared to the TSS21,34–36. Since θ TI always shows positive values in all our devices, we conclude that the TSS dominated SOT is the main contribution to the large enhancement of θ TI in region III.
To further confirm that the TSS dominate SOT in region III (5–8 QL), we establish a model to quantify the carrier concentration in TSS (n TSS), 2DEG (n 2DEG) and BS (n 2D-Bulk), as well as the corresponding current shunting effect due to BS and 2DEG (Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Fig. 3). As shown in Fig. 4a, the n 2DEG decreases significantly as t BiSe ≤8 QL, while n TSS shows a slight increase as t BiSe decreases. This observation reproduces the inherent behaviors of TSS and 2DEG carriers measured in very thin Bi2Se3 films26. Moreover, the larger value of n TSS compared to n 2DEG for t BiSe ≤ 8 QL corroborates a TSS dominated transport in thin Bi2Se3 film region (Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Figs. 4–7). Figure 4b shows the location of the Fermi level (E F) relative to the Dirac point (E DP) and Fermi vector (k F), we find that E F – E DP (k F) gradually increases from ~403 to 447 meV (from ~0.123 to 0.135 Å–1) as t BiSe decreases, indicating that the DP slightly moves downwards to a larger binding energy which accounts for the weak increase of n TSS. The value of E F – E DP (k F) and the DP movement are in line with previous ARPES measurements for Bi2Se3 films35,37–40. Figure 4c shows that the charge currents in the TSS on the top surface over the total currents flowing in Bi2Se3 (I TSS/I total) increases from ~0.2 to 0.4 as t BiSe decreases from 20 to 5 QL (Supplementary Note 5), which again verifies that the TSS dominates the region III.
In addition, we estimate the “interface” SOT efficiency from TSS (λ TSS) by using an interface charge current density J C-TSS (A cm–1) in TSS (Supplementary Note 6 and Supplementary Figs. 8–11). As shown in Fig. 4d, we find λ TSS is in the range of ~0.38 to 0.82 nm−1 when t BiSe ≤ 8 QL at room temperature, which is consistent with recently reported interface SOT efficiency values in (Bi1−xSbx)2Te3 13. In principle, λ TSS is inversely propotional to the Fermi velocity V F and remains almost constant at different t BiSe 13, however, a pronounced variation of λ TSS is observed. This deviation unambiguously suggests that there is an opposite spin accumulation mechanism which cancels part of the spins generated by TSS in Bi2Se3. We attribute this to the Rashba states in 2DEG21,34–36. From the change of λ TSS, we can extract the interface SOT efficiency from 2DEG (λ 2DEG) ≈ −0.4 nm–1 in the thin film regime (Supplementary Note 7). After excluding the 2DEG contribution, the amended interface SOT efficiency from TSS denoted by red circles in Fig. 4d, shows a constant value of ~0.8 nm–1 for 7, 8 and 10-QL Bi2Se3 devices, which is simliar to the value of λ TSS ~ 0.82 nm–1 at t BiSe = 5 QL (Supplementary Note 7 and Supplementary Figs. 8–11).
SOT-driven magnetization switching in Bi2Se3/Py
The ST-FMR measurements and the above analysis reveal that the contribution of TSS is dominant in the thin Bi2Se3 films (5–8 QL), leading to a higher SOT efficiency at room temperature. Subsequently, we demonstrate the SOT-induced magnetization switching in Bi2Se3 (8 QL)/Py (6 nm) heterostructures (see Methods section) at room temperature by applying a pulsed dc current I. The high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) image shows a clean and smooth interface between the Bi2Se3 and Py layer (see Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). In order to take advantage of the higher SOT efficiency and flow enough charge currents in the Bi2Se3 layer, an 8-QL Bi2Se3 is utilized. As depicted in Fig. 5a, the continuous Py layer is separated into five well-defined rectangles (yellow dashed boxes) and magnetically isolated by Cu bars. The magnetic easy axis of Py rectangles is along ±y directions due to the shape anisotropy. The magnetization direction of Py is collinear with the incoming spin directions (Fig. 2b) and thus the spins can directly switch the magnetization direction of Py without any external assisted magnetic field, which are captured by MOKE imaging measurements (see Methods section).
Figure 5a–e (top panel) show the SOT-driven magnetization switching by applying a pulsed I along the +x-axis. At the beginning of this set of measurements, we first saturate the Py magnetization along the +y-axis by applying an in-plane external magnetic field (H). Then, we remove H and apply I along the +x-axis to the device. When the current density in Bi2Se3 (J C) is zero, we capture the MOKE image as shown in Fig. 5a. The dark contrast represents the magnetization along the +y-axis, indicated by the white arrow. We find that as J C increases, the area of the switched magnetization with light contrast gradually expands (see Fig. 5b–d). Finally, the magnetization of all Py rectangles is switched to the −y-axis at J C = 5.7 × 105 A cm–2, which is indicated by the white arrow in Fig. 5e. Similarly, for the other set of measurements in Fig. 5f–j, we first initialize the Py magnetization along the −y-axis. Then we remove H and apply I of opposite polarity, i.e., along the −x-axis. As J C increases, the Py magnetization switches from the −y (Fig. 5f, light contrast) to +y-axis (Fig. 5j, dark contrast) at J C = 6.2 × 105 A cm–2, exhibiting the opposite switching direction. The SOT-induced switching is reproducible in other devices (Supplementary Note 8 and Supplementary Fig. 12). We find that the current density required for the room temperature SOT-induced magnetization switching in Bi2Se3/Py is extremely low at ~6 × 105 A cm–2, which is one to two orders of magnitude smaller than that with heavy metals23–25. Moreover, based on the conventional antidamping spin-torque-driven magnetization switching model24,41 with consideration of thermal fluctuation and reverse domain nucleation, we determine the SOT efficiency for Bi2Se3/Py to be ~1.71, which is in accord with the value from our ST-FMR measurements (Supplementary Note 9). This agreement further corroborates the excellent efficiency of TIs in spin generation and SOT-driven magnetization switching. Moreover, the robust SOT-induced magnetization switching is also observed in devices with a Cu or NiO insertion layer between the Bi2Se3 and Py layer (Supplementary Note 11 and Supplementary Figs. 14–16). From the control measurements, we find that neither the Joule heating nor the current-induced Oersted field could lead to the observed current-induced magnetization switching (Supplementary Notes 10 and 12, Supplementary Figs. 13 and 17).
Discussion
It has been suggested that interdiffusion may occur at the interface between TI and transition metals42,43, which can play a role in the TI SOT-induced magnetization switching despite maintaining the TSS43. The exact role of interdiffusion in the switching process, however, remains unclear, and suggests that future studies focused on the TI/FM interface are necessary.
The fundamental obstacle for high-density non-volatile applications of magnetic devices in a conventional spin torque scheme is the high critical switching current density, resulting in a large size of the current driving transistor. Utilizing the giant SOT effect in Bi2Se3, which can be grown in a wafer scale using MBE, we achieve a significantly low J C to switch a conventional 3d ferromagnet NiFe, which is widely utilized in industries, addressing an outstanding scalability issue in modern magnetic devices. Moreover, no requirement of an assistive magnetic field for our demonstrated magnetization switching scheme makes the TI/FM material systems easy to integrate into the established industrial technology for magnetic devices. Our above findings may bring this exotic newly discovered quantum matter from research activities to core ingredients in real spintronic applications.
Methods
Film growth and device fabrication
High-quality Bi2Se3 films ranging from 5 to 20 QLs are grown on Al2O3 (0001) substrates in a MBE system (MBC-1000-2C from ULVAC) with a base pressure <1.5 × 10–9 Torr, by using two-step deposition procedure44,45. The sapphire substrates are first cleaned in acetone, isopropanol and de-ionized water, and subsequently annealed at 750 °C for 30 min in a vacuum after being transferred into the growth chamber. Elemental Bi (6N) and Se (5N) solid sources are evaporated from standard Knudsen cells under a Se/Bi flux ratio of ~20. To reduce Se vacancies in Bi2Se3, initial 2–3 QL Bi2Se3 are deposited at 150 °C, and then the substrate temperature is ramped to 250 °C at 5 °C min−1 under Se flux for the second step growth. Our Bi2Se3 films have smooth surface with a roughness of ~0.5 nm and show a clear terrace step of ~1 nm (≈1 QL). The morphology indicates the high quality of our Bi2Se3 films. After the Bi2Se3 growth, the bare Bi2Se3 films are immediately transferred into a magnetron sputtering chamber via air in the standard cleanroom environment with a well-controlled levels of low humidity and constant temperature. The transfer time was strictly controlled under 5 min before pumping down the sputtering chamber. For the ST-FMR devices, a 7-nm thick Co40Fe40B20 (CFB) is subsequently sputtered on the Bi2Se3 film with a low power of 60 W at room temperature with a base pressure of ~3 × 10−9 Torr. Finally, the Bi2Se3/CFB bilayer is protected by the sputtered MgO (2 nm)/Al2O3 (3 nm) layer. For the MOKE imaging devices, the Py (6 nm)/MgO (1 nm)/SiO2 (4 nm) stacks are subsequently sputtered onto the Bi2Se3 (8 QL) films with an in-situ magnetic field along the y-axis (i.e., perpendicular to the current channel, see Fig. 5f) at room temperature with a base pressure of ~3 × 10−9 Torr. A very low sputtering power of 40 W is used for the Py deposition. Subsequently, five 2-μm wide grooves on the Py layer are etched and backfilled with nonmagnetic metal Cu, which divide the continuous Py layer into five rectangles and make them magnetically isolated. All devices are patterned by photolithography and ion milling.
ST-FMR measurements
The ST-FMR signals are detected by a lock-in amplifier. The frequencies and nominal power of the rf current I RF are 6–9 GHz and 15 dBm, respectively. An in-plane external magnetic field (H) is applied at a fixed angle (θ H) of 35° with respect to I RF.
MOKE imaging measurements
The Py magnetic easy anisotropy in the device is along the ±y-axis (Fig. 5f) due to the shape anisotropy. This allows us to capture the magnetization switching after pulsed dc current is off, where there is no current-induced spurious effects in the MOKE images. For the MOKE imaging measurements, we first saturate the Py magnetization along the +y or −y-axis with an in-plane external magnetic field H, then we remove H and apply a pulsed dc current (500 μs pulse width) to observe the magnetization switching using MOKE microscope.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the A*STAR’s Pharos Programme on Topological Insulators.
Author contributions
Y.W. and H.Y.: Conceived and designed the research. D.Z., Yi.W. and K.-L.T.: Carried out thin film growth and characterization. Y.W. and D.Z.: Carried out ST-FMR sample preparation and measurements with inputs from R.M., R.R. and S.S. Y.W. and Y.Y.: Fabricated the samples for MOKE measurements. Y.W. and Y.Wu.: Performed MOKE imaging measurements. Y.Wu.: Prepared the MOKE setup. Y.W. and M.E.: Performed model the analysis. Y.W., D.Z., J.Y., R.R. and H.Y.: Prepared the figures and manuscript. All authors discussed the data and the results. H.Y.: Supervised the project.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Footnotes
Yi Wang and Dapeng Zhu contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01583-4.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Hirsch JE. Spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999;83:1834–1837. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1834. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhang S. Spin Hall effect in the presence of spin diffusion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000;85:393–396. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hoffmann A. Spin Hall effects in metals. IEEE. Trans. Magn. 2013;49:5172–5193. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2013.2262947. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sinova J, Valenzuela SO, Wunderlich J, Back CH, Jungwirth T. Spin Hall effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2015;87:1213–1260. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bychkov YA, Rashba E. Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy. JETP lett. 1984;39:78. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Edelstein VM. Spin polarization of conduction electrons induced by electric current in two-dimensional asymmetric electron systems. Solid State Commun. 1990;73:233–235. doi: 10.1016/0038-1098(90)90963-C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mellnik A, et al. Spin-transfer torque generated by a topological insulator. Nature. 2014;511:449–451. doi: 10.1038/nature13534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang Y, et al. Topological surface states originated spin-orbit torques in Bi2Se3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;114:257202. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.257202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Deorani P, et al. Observation of inverse spin Hall effect in bismuth selenide. Phys. Rev. B. 2014;90:094403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.094403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shiomi Y, et al. Spin-electricity conversion induced by spin injection into topological insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014;113:196601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.196601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fan Y, et al. Magnetization switching through giant spin–orbit torque in a magnetically doped topological insulator heterostructure. Nat. Mater. 2014;13:699–704. doi: 10.1038/nmat3973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rojas-Sánchez JC, et al. Spin to charge conversion at room temperature by spin pumping into a new type of topological insulator: α-Sn films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016;116:096602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.096602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kondou K, et al. Fermi-level-dependent charge-to-spin current conversion by Dirac surface states of topological insulators. Nat. Phys. 2016;12:1027–1031. doi: 10.1038/nphys3833. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang H, et al. Surface-state-dominated spin-charge current conversion in topological-insulator-ferromagnetic-insulator heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016;117:076601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.076601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hasan MZ, Kane CL. Colloquium: topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010;82:3045–3067. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Qi X-L, Zhang S-C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2011;83:1057–1110. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Moore JE. The birth of topological insulators. Nature. 2010;464:194–198. doi: 10.1038/nature08916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jamali M, et al. Giant spin pumping and inverse Spin Hall effect in the presence of surface and bulk spin−orbit coupling of topological insulator Bi2Se3. Nano. Lett. 2015;15:7126–7132. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu L, et al. Spin-polarized tunneling study of spin-momentum locking in topological insulators. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;91:235437. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.235437. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee JS, Richardella A, Hickey DR, Mkhoyan KA, Samarth N. Mapping the chemical potential dependence of current-induced spin polarization in a topological insulator. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;92:155312. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.155312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bahramy MS, et al. Emergent quantum confinement at topological insulator surfaces. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:1159. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bianchi M, et al. Coexistence of the topological state and a two-dimensional electron gas on the surface of Bi2Se3. Nat. Commun. 2010;1:128. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Miron IM, et al. Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection. Nature. 2011;476:189–193. doi: 10.1038/nature10309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu L, et al. Spin-torque switching with the giant Spin Hall effect of tantalum. Science. 2012;336:555. doi: 10.1126/science.1218197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu L, Lee OJ, Gudmundsen TJ, Ralph DC, Buhrman RA. Current-induced switching of perpendicularly magnetized magnetic layers using spin torque from the Spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;109:096602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.096602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bansal N, Kim YS, Brahlek M, Edrey E, Oh S. Thickness-independent transport Channels in topological insulator Bi2Se3 thin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;109:116804. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.116804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu L, Moriyama T, Ralph DC, Buhrman RA. Spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance induced by the Spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;106:036601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.036601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang Y, Deorani P, Qiu X, Kwon JH, Yang H. Determination of intrinsic spin Hall angle in Pt. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014;105:152412. doi: 10.1063/1.4898593. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hsieh D, et al. Observation of unconventional quantum spin textures in topological insulators. Science. 2009;323:919. doi: 10.1126/science.1167733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pan ZH, et al. Electronic structure of the topological insulator Bi2Se3 using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy: evidence for a nearly full surface spin polarization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;106:257004. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.257004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jozwiak C, et al. Photoelectron spin-flipping and texture manipulation in a topological insulator. Nat. Phys. 2013;9:293–298. doi: 10.1038/nphys2572. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Park BC, et al. Terahertz single conductance quantum and topological phase transitions in topological insulator Bi2Se3 ultrathin films. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6552. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Linder J, Yokoyama T, Sudbø A. Anomalous finite size effects on surface states in the topological insulator Bi2Se3. Phys. Rev. B. 2009;80:205401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.205401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wray LA, et al. A topological insulator surface under strong Coulomb, magnetic and disorder perturbations. Nat. Phys. 2011;7:32–37. doi: 10.1038/nphys1838. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.King PDC, et al. Large tunable rashba spin splitting of a two-dimensional electron gas in Bi2Se3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;107:096802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.096802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fischer MH, Vaezi A, Manchon A, Kim E-A. Large spin torque in topological insulator/ferromagnetic metal bilayers. Phys. Rev B. 2013;93:125303. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.125303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Xia Y, et al. Observation of a large-gap topological-insulator class with a single Dirac cone on the surface. Nat. Phys. 2009;5:398–402. doi: 10.1038/nphys1274. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang Y, et al. Crossover of the three-dimensional topological insulator Bi2Se3 to the two-dimensional limit. Nat. Phys. 2010;6:584–588. doi: 10.1038/nphys1689. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kuroda K, et al. Hexagonally deformed fermi surface of the 3D topological insulator Bi2Se3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;105:076802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.076802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Neupane M, et al. Observation of quantum-tunnelling-modulated spin texture in ultrathin topological insulator Bi2Se3 films. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3841. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fukami S, Anekawa T, Zhang C, Ohno H. A spin–orbit torque switching scheme with collinear magnetic easy axis and current configuration. Nat. Nanotech. 2016;11:621–625. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2016.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shaughnessy M, Bartelt N, Zimmerman J, Sugar J. Energetics and diffusion of gold in bismuth telluride-based thermoelectric compounds. J. Appl. Phys. 2014;115:063705. doi: 10.1063/1.4865735. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Eich A, et al. Absence of superconductivity in ultrathin layers of FeSe synthesized on a topological insulator. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;94:125437. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.125437. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Li H, et al. The van der Waals epitaxy of Bi2Se3 on the vicinal Si (111) surface: an approach for preparing high-quality thin films of a topological insulator. New. J. Phys. 2010;12:103038. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/12/10/103038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bansal N, et al. Epitaxial growth of topological insulator Bi2Se3 film on Si (111) with atomically sharp interface. Thin Solid Films. 2011;520:224–229. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.07.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.