Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 18.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2017 Jul 27;19(16):4271–4274. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b01938

Nickel-Catalyzed Coupling of Azoles with Aromatic Nitriles

Mckenna G Hanson 1, Noelle Olson 1, Zubaoyi Yi 1, Grace Wilson 1, Dipannita Kalyani 1,*
PMCID: PMC5679019  NIHMSID: NIHMS916062  PMID: 28749682

Abstract

This manuscript describes the Ni-catalyzed coupling of azoles with aromatic nitriles. The use of BPh3 promotes these arylations with electronically diverse oxazoles and benzonitriles. While the nickel catalyst is necessary for the arylations of phenyl oxazoles, arylation of benzoxazoles with some nitriles affords the arylated products even in the absence of the Ni-catalyst albeit in lower yield than the catalyzed process. The scope and rates of the Ni-catalyzed process are higher than the uncatalyzed transformation.

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms916062u1.jpg


Diverse aromatic nitriles are relatively inexpensive, bench stable and commercially available.1 Furthermore, the robust CN group is retained in many transition metal-catalyzed reactions, thereby enabling the late stage derivatization of this functionality in a multi-step synthesis.1 Despite these advantages, only a few sporadic reports on biaryl synthesis using aromatic nitriles have been published.2 These include Ni-catalyzed cross-couplings of aryl nitriles with aryl magnesium,2b boron2c or manganese reagents2d. As part of our program on transition metal catalyzed arylations,3 this manuscript describes the hitherto unknown biaryl formation via Ni-catalyzed direct arylation using aromatic nitriles. These arylations expand the repertoire of electrophiles for Ni-catalyzed C–H arylations, which are thus far limited to the use of aryl halides, phenolic, and ester electrophiles.4,5,6,7 Importantly, previous reports on Ni-catalyzed direct arylations demonstrate the preferential functionalization of the pivalate, carbamate or chloride leaving groups in the presence of an aryl nitrile.5c,e Hence, the method described herein may enable selective arylations of the pivalate (or chloride and carbamate) and nitrile leaving groups at different stages in a multi-step synthesis. Furthermore, the arylations detailed in this manuscript are a timely contribution to the recent surge in interest for the development of transformations using earth-abundant metal catalysts.4,8

The commonly proposed mechanism for nickel-catalyzed direct arylation involves three key steps: oxidative addition, C–H activation, and reductive elimination.4,9 Although biaryl synthesis via C–H arylation using nitriles has remained elusive, the three elementary steps in the mechanism are individually documented using nickel complexes, thereby supporting the feasibility of the proposed arylations.10

Our studies commenced with the investigation of reaction parameters for the arylation of phenyl oxazole 1 with 3-trifluoromethylbenzonitrile. These explorations began with the use of catalyst/ligand combinations that have been previously successful for Ni-catalyzed direct arylations.4,5 As shown in Table 1, product 1a is obtained in moderate yield using Ni(COD)2/dcype catalyst combination in the presence of Cs2CO3 as the base and diglyme as the solvent at 140 or 160 °C (entries 1 and 2). Ligands similar to dcype afford lower or comparable yields of the desired product.11 Use of 1.5 equivalents of either Cs2CO3 or K3PO4 affords similar yields of 1a (entries 1 and 3). However, increased amount of K3PO4 leads to enhanced yields of 1a (entries 3 and 4). Lower catalyst loadings result in diminished yields of 1a over 24 or 48 h (entries 5 and 6). Previous reports on Ni-catalyzed cross-couplings use Lewis acids to accelerate the transformations involving aryl nitriles.12 Hence, a number of Lewis acids (CuF2, ZnCl2, Al-Me2Cl, BPh3) were evaluated for the formation of 1a. This study revealed that the use of BPh3 (40 mol %) affords 1a with lower catalyst loadings (10 mol % Ni(COD)2) in yields comparable to that obtained in the absence of BPh3 with 20 mol % Ni(COD)2 (cf. entries 4 and 10). Use of 40 or 60 mol % BPh3 affords similar yields of 1a (entries 10 and 11). No product is obtained in the absence of Ni(COD)2 both in the presence and absence of BPh3 (entries 8, 9 and 12). To obtain preliminary insight into the role of BPh3, we monitored the reaction profile of arylations with and without BPh3 using 10 mol % Ni(COD)2.11 These studies show that the reaction without BPh3 levels off at about 30% yield of 1a after 1 h. However, the arylation with BPh3 keeps progressing even after 3 h. Importantly, there is a very small difference in the initial rates of the two transformations. Taken together these data suggest that BPh3 might be suppressing catalyst deactivation possibly via sequestering the cyanide anion. This hypothesis is consistent with the lower yields of 1a from the Ni-catalyzed reaction in the presence of KCN (entry 7).13

Table 1.

Optimization of Direct Arylation

graphic file with name nihms916062u2.jpg

entry ligand base additive yield of 1a (%)i
1 dcype Cs2CO3 none 62
2a dcype Cs2CO3 none 59

3 dcype K3PO4 none 59
4b dcype K3PO4 none 71
5b,c dcype K3PO4 none 26
6b,c,d dcype K3PO4 none 33
7b,e dcype K3PO4 KCN 23

8b,f none K3PO4 none 0
9b,f dcype K3PO4 none 0

10 b,c,g dcype K3PO4 BPh3 61
11 b,c,h dcype K3PO4 BPh3 63
12 b,f,g none K3PO4 BPh3 0
a

Conducted at 160 °C.

b

3.0 equiv of K3PO4 used.

c

Ni(COD)2 (10 mol %) and dcype (11 mol %) used.

d

Reaction time was 48 h.

e

KCN (1.0 equiv) added.

f

General conditions, but with no Ni(COD)2.

g

40 mol % BPh3 used.

h

60 mol % BPh3 used.

i

Calibrated GC yields against hexadecane as the internal standard.

The optimal conditions for the formation of 1a with or without BPh3 (Table 1, entries 4 and 10) can be applied to the arylation of electronically varied oxazoles (Scheme 2). Electron-rich, electron-neutral, and electron-deficient oxazoles afford the corresponding products in comparable yields (cf. 1a–3a). Analogous to the formation of 1a (Table 1), the use of BPh3 with 10 mol % Ni(COD)2 affords the arylated products in comparable yields to that obtained using 20 mol % Ni(COD)2 regardless of azole electronics. Importantly, no product is obtained in the absence of Ni(COD)2/dcype regardless of the oxazole substrate.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Scope of Oxazolesa

[a]Isolated yields. [b] Ni(COD)2 (10 mol %) and dcype (11 mol %), and BPh3 (40 mol %) used.

We next investigated the use of benzoxazoles in these arylations. Not surprisingly, the Ni-catalyzed coupling of 5-methyl benzoxazole with 3-trifluoromethyl benzonitrile affords 11a in good yield using Cs2CO3 or K3PO4 (Table 2, entries 1–2).

Table 2.

Arylation of 5-methyl benzoxazolea

graphic file with name nihms916062u3.jpg

entry ligand base time (h) yield of 11a (%)a
1 dcype Cs2CO3 24 77
2 dcype K3PO4 24 71
3b dcype Cs2CO3 24 48

4c none Cs2CO3 24 27
5c none K3PO4 24 23

6 dcype Cs2CO3 8 79
7c none Cs2CO3 8 7
8 b,d dcype Cs2CO3 24 74
9 c,d none Cs2CO3 24 0
a

Calibrated GC yields against hexadecane as the internal standard.

b

10 mol % Ni(COD)2 and 11 mol % dcype used.

c

In the absence of Ni(COD)2.

d

40 mol % BPh3 added.

Unlike the coupling of phenyl oxazoles (Scheme 2), product 11a is formed in significant amounts (23–27% yield) 14,15 in the absence of the nickel catalyst possibly via a SNAr pathway (entries 4–5).16 The catalyzed arylation is significantly faster affording 11a in 79% yield over 8 h (versus 7% yield from the non-catalyzed process, cf. entries 6 and 7). These results suggest negligible contribution from the non-catalyzed process to the formation of 11a in the presence of the Ni(COD)2/dcype. Analogous to the arylations detailed in Scheme 2, the use of BPh3 (40 mol %) enables the use of lower catalyst loadings (cf. entries 1 and 8).11 Interestingly, however, BPh3 suppresses the non-catalyzed arylation (cf. entries 4 and 9).17

These trends for the catalyzed and the non-catalyzed arylations using meta-trifluoromethyl benzonitrile are observed for electronically varied benzoxazoles (Scheme 3). Analogous to arylations in Scheme 2, BPh3 promotes these arylations regardless of benzoxazole electronics. The non-catalyzed arylation affords the arylated products in yields ranging between 14–68%. In the absence of Ni(COD)2/dcype, the highest yield (68%) of the arylated product (17a) is observed for the electron-deficient, fluoro-substituted benzoxazole substrate. The extent of the background reaction is diminished for electron-rich and electron-neutral azoles. The nickel catalyst is essential for the formation of product 18a from the arylation of the less-acidic benzothiazole substrate.18

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Scope of Benzoxazolesa

[a]Isolated yields [b] Yields for reactions in the absence of Ni(COD)2 and dcype [c] Yields using BPh3 (40 mol %) as additive, Ni(COD)2 (10 mol %) and dcype (11 mol %). [d] Calibrated GC yields against hexadecane as the standard. [e] dcypt was used in place of dcype.

Electronically diverse aryl and heteroaryl nitriles couple with 5-methyl benzoxazole and oxazoles to afford the products in modest to good yields (Scheme 4). The lowest yield was obtained for the reaction using the ortho-methyl benzonitrile to afford 11j. Interestingly, the identity of the ortho substituent on the nitrile is important since 11h and 11i were obtained in significantly higher yields. Akin to the coupling of benzoxazoles with 3-trifluoromethyl benzonitrile (Scheme 3), the non-catalyzed arylation of benzoxazoles affords significant yields of the biaryls with a few nitriles (Scheme 4). While no clear trends emerge, the nickel catalyst is necessary for the formation of biaryls using nitriles containing an ester (11f) or bearing a methoxy group at the ortho- (11i) or para-positions (11g–h)) relative to the CN functionality. Furthermore, analogous to results in Scheme 2, no product (1b1d, 1i, 1k) is obtained in the absence of Ni(COD)2/dcype for arylations with phenyl oxazole regardless of the nitrile substrate. Finally, BPh3 promotes the arylations of oxazoles and benzoxazoles with electron rich and electron deficient benzonitriles.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Scope of Nitrilesa

[a]Isolated yields [b] dcypt used instead of dcype. [c] Yields for reactions in the absence of Ni(COD)2 and dcype. [d] Yields using BPh3 (40 mol %) as additive, Ni(COD)2 (10 mol %), ligand (11 mol %). [e] Calibrated GC yields against hexadecane as the standard. [f] K3PO4 (3.0 equiv) used as the base.

In summary, this paper describes the first example of Ni-catalyzed arylation using electronically diverse azole and benzonitriles. The use of BPh3 for these transformations enables the use of lower catalyst loading regardless of the azole or nitrile substrates. While the nickel catalyst is necessary for the arylation of oxazoles, oxadiazole and benzothiazole subtrates, arylations of benzoxazoles can proceed in the absence of Ni(COD)2/dcype. The extent of the non-catalyzed process is dependent on the acidity of the azole and electronics nature of the benzonitrile substrates. Furthermore, the catalyzed process is significantly faster than the non-catalyzed reaction. Overall, the scope and efficiencies of the Ni-catalyzed arylation are higher than the non-catalyzed process.

Supplementary Material

SI

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the NIH NIGMS (R15 GM107892), NSF (CHE-1554630) and St Olaf College. The authors acknowledge St. Olaf College undergraduate students Deborah Steinberg and Ryan Walser-Kuntz for assisting with synthesis of oxazole substrates and rate studies.

Footnotes

Supporting Information. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.a) Wen Q, Lu P, Wang Y. RSC Adv. 2014;4:47806–47826. [Google Scholar]; b) Wang R, Falck JR. RSC Adv. 2014;4:1062–1066. doi: 10.1039/C3RA45178J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Souillart L, Cramer N. Chem Rev. 2015;115:9410–9464. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Chen F, Wang T, Jiao N. Chem Rev. 2014;114:8613–8661. doi: 10.1021/cr400628s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Ruhland K. Eur J Org Chem. 2012;114:2683–2706. [Google Scholar]; f) Blaser H-U, Indolese A, Naud F, Nettekoven U, Schnyder A. Adv Syn Catal. 2014;346:1583–1598. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.a) Tobisu M, Kita Y, Ano Y, Chatani N. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:15982–15989. doi: 10.1021/ja804992n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Miller JA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:6991–6993. [Google Scholar]; c) Yu DG, Yu M, Guan BT, Li BJ, Zheng Y, Wu ZH, Shi ZJ. Org Lett. 2009;11:3374–3377. doi: 10.1021/ol901217m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Liu N, Wang Z. Adv Synth Catal. 2012;354:1641–1645. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201100831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.a) Nervig CS, Waller PJ, Kalyani D. Org Lett. 2012;14:4838–4841. doi: 10.1021/ol302166n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Wang J, Ferguson D, Kalyani D. Tetrahedron. 2013;69:5780–5790. [Google Scholar]; c) Ferguson D, Rudolph SR, Kalyani D. ACS Catal. 2014;4:2395–2401. doi: 10.1021/cs500587b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Steinberg DF, Turk MC, Kalyani D. Tetrahedron. 2017;73:2196–2209. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2017.02.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.a) Yamaguchi J, Muto K, Itami K. Eur J Org Chem. 2013:19–30. [Google Scholar]; b) Tasker SZ, Standley EA, Jamison TF. Nature. 2014;509:299–309. doi: 10.1038/nature13274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Cai X, Xie B. Arkivoc. 2015:184–211. [Google Scholar]; d) Khan MS, Haque A, Al-Suti MK, Raithby PR. J Organomet Chem. 2015;793:114–133. [Google Scholar]; e) Johnson SA. Dalton Trans. 2015;44:10905–10913. doi: 10.1039/c5dt00032g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Ananikov VP. ACS Catal. 2015;5:1964–1971. [Google Scholar]; g) Hyster TK. Catal Lett. 2015;145:458–467. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.a) Hachiya H, Hirano K, Satoh T, Miura M. Org Lett. 2009;11:1737–1740. doi: 10.1021/ol900159a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Amaike K, Muto K, Yamaguchi J, Itami K. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:13573–13576. doi: 10.1021/ja306062c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Muto K, Yamaguchi J, Itami K. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:169–172. doi: 10.1021/ja210249h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Meng L, Kamada Y, Muto K, Yamaguchi J, Itami K. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2013;52:10048–10051. doi: 10.1002/anie.201304492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Muto K, Hatakeyama T, Yamaguchi J, Itami K. Chem Sci. 2015;6:6792–67. doi: 10.1039/c5sc02942b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Muto K, Yamaguchi J, Musaev DG, Itami K. Nature Commun. 2015;6:1–8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Wang Y, Wu S-B, Shi W-J, Shi Z-J. Org Lett. 2016;18:2548–2551. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b00819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.a) Alberico D, Scott ME, Lautens M. Chem Rev. 2007;107:174–238. doi: 10.1021/cr0509760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) McGlacken GP, Bateman LM. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:2447–2464. doi: 10.1039/b805701j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Ackermann L, Vicente R, Kapdi AR. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:9792–9826. doi: 10.1002/anie.200902996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Kuhl N, Hopkinson MN, Wencel-Delord J, Glorius F. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2012;51:10236–10254. doi: 10.1002/anie.201203269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Segawa Y, Maekawa T, Itami K. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54:66–81. doi: 10.1002/anie.201403729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.a) Chen X, Engle KM, Wang DH, Yu JQ. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2009;48:5094–5115. doi: 10.1002/anie.200806273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Lyons TW, Sanford MS. Chem Rev. 2010;110:1147–1169. doi: 10.1021/cr900184e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Gorelsky S, Lapointe D, Fagnou K. J Org Chem. 2012;77:658–668. doi: 10.1021/jo202342q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Kozhushkov SI, Potukuchi HK, Ackermann L. Catal Sci Technol. 2013;3:562–571. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.a) Cahiez G, Moyeux A. Chem Rev. 2010;110:1435–1462. doi: 10.1021/cr9000786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Rosen BM, Quasdorf KW, Wilson DA, Zhang N, Resmerita AM, Garg NK, Percec V. Chem Rev. 2011;111:1346–1416. doi: 10.1021/cr100259t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Nakamura E, Hatakeyama T, Ito S, Ishizuka K, Ilies L, Nakamura M. Organic Reactions. 2013;83:1–209. [Google Scholar]; d) Tekale SU, Jadhav VB, Pagore VP, Kauthale SS, Gaikwad DD, Pawar RP. Mini Rev Org Chem. 2013;10:281–301. [Google Scholar]; e) Mesganaw T, Garg NK. Org Process Res Dev. 2013;17:29–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.a) Muto K, Yamaguchi J, Lei A, Itami K. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:16384–16387. doi: 10.1021/ja409803x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Xu H, Muto K, Yamaguchi J, Zhao C, Itami K. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:14834–14844. doi: 10.1021/ja5071174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Lu Q, Yu H, Fu Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:8252–8260. doi: 10.1021/ja4127455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Li Z, Liu L. Chinese J Catal. 2015;36:3–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.a) Garcia JJ, Brunkan NM, Jones WD. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:9547–955. doi: 10.1021/ja0204933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Schaub T, Döring C, Radius U. Dalton Trans. 2007:1993–2002. doi: 10.1039/b702959d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Abla M, Yamamoto T. J Organomet Chem. 1997;532:267–270. [Google Scholar]; d) Garcia JJ, Jones WD. Organometallics. 2000;19:5544–5545. [Google Scholar]; e) Garcia-Ventura I, Flores-Alamo M, Garcia JJ. RSC Advances. 2016;6:101259–10126. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.See SI for detailed optimization. See Scheme S1 in SI for reaction profiles for arylations with and without BPh3.
  • 12.a) Nakao Y, Yada A, Ebata S, Hiyama T. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:2428–2429. doi: 10.1021/ja067364x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Yada A, Yukawa T, Idei H, Nakao Y, Hiyama T. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 2010;83:619–634. [Google Scholar]; c) Yada A, Ebata S, Idei H, Zhang D, Nakao Y, Hiyama T. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 2010;83:1170–1184. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alternatively, BPh3 might also be promoting the oxidative addition and C-H activation steps.
  • 14.The non-catalyzed reaction proceeds to the same extent when commercial 5-methyl benzoxazole is used with or without further recrystallization. Anhydrous Cs2CO3 (99.995%) and K3PO4 (97%) were used for these reactions. Low yield of 11a from the non-catalyzed reaction is due to low conversions.
  • 15.Use of stronger bases (MOtBu, M = Li, Na or K) afford 11a in atmost 4% yield from the non-catalyzed arylation (Table S2 in the SI).
  • 16.Thompson AD, Huestis MP. J Org Chem. 2013;78:762–769. doi: 10.1021/jo302307y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.BPh3 may inhibit the un-catalyzed reaction by complexing with the deprotonated azole. However, further studies are needed to support this hypothesis.
  • 18.Shen K, Fu Y, Li J-N, Liu L, Guo Q-X. Tetrahedron. 2007:1568–1576. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES