Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2017 Nov 9;5(45):e01124-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01124-17

Complete Genome Sequence of Indigo-Producing Bacterium Celeribacter sp. Strain TSPH2

Hae-Seon Kim a, Sun Ho Cha b, Ho Young Suk c, Tae-Hyung Kwon d, Jung-Hee Woo a,
PMCID: PMC5679796  PMID: 29122863

ABSTRACT

Celeribacter sp. strain TSPH2, a novel producer of indigo, was isolated from oil-contaminated sediment. We present here its genome sequence consisting of one circular chromosome (4 Mb) and one plasmid (0.15 Mb), with an overall G+C content of 60.9%. This strain contains oxygenase genes involved in indigo synthesis, such as flavin-containing monooxygenase.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Indigo, one of the oldest blue textile dyes, has traditionally been produced from the extracts of several plants, such as Indigofera sp. and Polygonum tinctorium. In recent decades, indigo has been generally produced by chemical synthesis, which poses risks to the health of humans and the environment. As a result of attempts to develop microbiological methods for the production of environmentally friendly indigo, several wild-type strains producing indigo, such as strains belonging to the genera Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, and Comamonas, have been found to date (15). Indigo can also be produced by recombinant Escherichia coli expressing various oxygenases (69). We recently isolated the indigo-producing strain Celeribacter sp. TSPH2 and report here its genome information.

Strain TSPH2 was isolated from a sample of oil-contaminated sediment collected on 11 May 2011 in the city of Taean, which is located on the west coast of South Korea. This strain was identified by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis with 99% confidence. The extracted DNA was used to construct 20-kb SMRTbell template libraries. The whole-genome sequence was determined using the PacBio RS II sequencing platform (Pacific Biosciences) (10), yielding 151,110 long reads totaling 774,000,765 bp after filtering of the subreads. De novo assembly was conducted using the Hierarchical Genome Assembly Process version 2.3 (11), including consensus polishing with Quiver. As the estimated genome size was 4,212,407 bp with an average coverage of 123×, we performed error correction on the longest seed bases (about 30×, 150,019,215 bp) and then assembled the rest of the shorter reads with the error-corrected reads. Since bacterial genomes and plasmids are typically circular, each of the contigs was checked using MUMmer version 3.5 (12). The finished genomic sequences were annotated with NCBI’s Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline.

The Celeribacter sp. TSPH2 genome contained one circular chromosome of 4,009,276 bp with a G+C content of 61.3% and one circular plasmid of 148,161 bp with a G+C content of 60.4%. The genome contained 9 rRNAs, 50 tRNAs, and 4,215 protein-coding genes.

Our genome analysis revealed that this strain carried oxygenases, such as flavin-containing monooxygenase (FMO), involved in the synthesis of indigo using indole as the substrate. The FMO exhibited a similarity of 80% to that observed in Methylophaga aminisulfidivorans (13).

Accession number(s).

The complete genome sequence of Celeribacter sp. strain TSPH2 has been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers CP022196 and CP022197. Celeribacter sp. TSPH2 is currently available from the Korean Culture Center of Microorganisms under the accession number KCCM 11874P.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Gyeongbuk Institute for Marine Bio-Industry In-House R&D Program and by the Gyeongsangbuk-do R&D Program.

Footnotes

Citation Kim H-S, Cha SH, Suk HY, Kwon T-H, Woo J-H. 2017. Complete genome sequence of indigo-producing bacterium Celeribacter sp. strain TSPH2. Genome Announc 5:e01124-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01124-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Qu Y, Pi W, Ma F, Zhou J, Zhang X. 2010. Influence and optimization of growth substrates on indigo formation by novel isolate Acinetobacter sp. PP-2. Bioresour Technol 101:4527–4532. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Doukyu N, Nakano T, Okuyama Y, Aono R. 2002. Isolation of an Acinetobacter sp. ST-550 which produces a high level of indigo in a water-organic solvent two-phase system containing high levels of indole. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58:543–546. doi: 10.1007/s00253-001-0919-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pathak H, Madamwar D. 2010. Biosynthesis of indigo dye by newly isolated naphthalene-degrading strain Pseudomonas sp. HOB1 and its application in dyeing cotton fabric. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160:1616–1626. doi: 10.1007/s12010-009-8638-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dua A, Chauhan K, Pathak H. 2014. Biotransformation of indigo pigment by indigenously isolated Pseudomonas sp. HAV-1 and assessment of its antioxidant property. Biotechnol Res Int 2014:109249. doi: 10.1155/2014/109249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Qu Y, Zhang X, Ma Q, Ma F, Zhang Q, Li X, Zhou H, Zhou J. 2012. Indigo biosynthesis by Comamonas sp. MQ. Biotechnol Lett 34:353–357. doi: 10.1007/s10529-011-0778-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ensley BD, Ratzkin BJ, Osslund TD, Simon MJ, Wackett LP, Gibson DT. 1983. Expression of naphthalene oxidation genes in Escherichia coli results in the biosynthesis of indigo. Science 222:167–169. doi: 10.1126/science.6353574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.O’Connor KE, Dobson AD, Hartmans S. 1997. Indigo formation by microorganisms expressing styrene monooxygenase activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4287–4291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ameria SP, Jung HS, Kim HS, Han SS, Kim HS, Lee JH. 2015. Characterization of a flavin-containing monooxygenase from Corynebacterium glutamicum and its application to production of indigo and indirubin. Biotechnol Lett 37:1637–1644. doi: 10.1007/s10529-015-1824-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stephens GM, Sidebotham JM, Mann NH, Dalton H. 1989. Cloning and expression in Escherichia coli of the toluene dioxygenase gene from Pseudomonas putida NCIB11767. FEMS Microbiol Lett 57:295–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1989.tb03352.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Varela-Alvarez E, Andreakis N, Lago-Leston A, Pearson GA, Serrao EA, Procaccini G, Duarte CM, Marba N. 2006. Genomic DNA isolation from green and brown Algae (Caulerpales and Fucales) for microsatellite library construction. J Phycol 42:741–745. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00218.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10:563–569. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 5:R12. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Han GH, Shin HJ, Kim SW. 2008. Optimization of bio-indigo production by recombinant E. coli harboring fmo gene. Enzyme Microb Technol 42:617–623. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2008.02.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES