Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2017 Nov 9;5(45):e01129-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01129-17

Complete Genome Sequences of Mycobacteriophages Clautastrophe, Kingsolomon, Krypton555, and Nicholas

Hui-Min Chung a, Tom D’Elia b, Joseph F Ross c, Samuel M Alvarado a, Molly-Catherine Brantley a, Lydia P Bricker a, Courtney R Butler a, Carson Crist a, Julia M Dane a, Brett W Farran a, Sierra Hobbs a, Michelle Lapak a, Conner Lovell a, Nicholas Ludergnani a, Allison McMullen a, Sohail A Mirza a, Noah Thrift a, Donald P Vaughan a, Grace Worley a, Amara Ejikemeuwa a, May Zaw a, Claude F Albritton c, Sarah C Bertrand c, Shanzay S Chaudhry c, Vzair A Cheema c, Camilla Do c, Michael L Do c, Huyen M Duong c, Dalia H El-Desoky c, Kelsey M Green c, Rhea N Lee c, Lauren A Thornton c, James M Vu c, Mah Noor Zahra c, Steven G Cresawn d, Ty H Stoner e, Rebecca A Garlena e, Deborah Jacobs-Sera e, Welkin H Pope e, Daniel A Russell e, Graham F Hatfull e,
PMCID: PMC5679797  PMID: 29122864

ABSTRACT

We report here the complete genome sequences of four subcluster L3 mycobacteriophages newly isolated from soil samples, using Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155 as the host. Comparative genomic analyses with four previously described subcluster L3 phages reveal strong nucleotide similarity and gene conservation, with several large insertions/deletions near their right genome ends.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Mycobacteriophages are viruses infecting Mycobacterium, a bacterial genus commonly found in soil and water (1). A collection of over 1,300 sequenced genomes of phages infecting Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155 has accumulated through the work of students in the Science Education Alliance Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) program, revealing mycobacteriophages to be highly diverse and to have complex relationships (2). These phages can be grouped by their relatedness into 25 clusters and 6 singletons (those with no close relatives) (3). We report here the genome sequences of mycobacteriophages Kingsolomon and Nicholas, isolated in Gulf Breeze, FL, and phages Clautastrophe and Krypton555, isolated in greater New Orleans, LA.

Phages Clautastrophe, Kingsolomon, Krypton555, and Nicholas were isolated either by direct plating or enrichment of soil samples using M. smegmatis mc2155 as the host, followed by plaque purification and amplification; electron microscopy showed that Kingsolomon and Nicholas are members of the family Siphoviridae. Following the isolation of double-stranded DNA, genomes were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform, and 150-base single-end reads were assembled using Newbler and Consed (4); coverage exceeded 1,800-fold for all genomes, and all have defined genome termini with 10-base complementary 3′ single-strand DNA extensions (right end, 5′-TCGATCAGCC). Genome annotations were performed using DNA Master (http://cobamide2.bio.pitt.edu/computer.htm), Phamerator (5), Glimmer (6), GeneMark (7), Aragorn (8), and tRNAscan-SE (9), and functional assignments were predicted using BLASTP (10) and HHpred (11). Repetitive-sequence motifs were identified using the MEME Suite software (12) and Geneious 10.1.3 (13).

All four genomes are closely related and similar to other subcluster L3 phages; all have similar GC% contents (59.1 to 59.3%). Genome lengths (72,055 bp, 76,075 bp, 70,413 bp, and 69,537 bp), numbers of protein-coding genes (122, 130, 112, and 110), and numbers of tRNA genes (10, 11, 10, and 10) were assigned for Clautastrophe, Krypton555, Nicholas, and Kingsolomon, respectively. The Nicholas and Kingsolomon genomes are almost identical, but Kingsolomon has an 876-bp deletion relative to Nicholas near its right genome end; Clautastrophe and Krypton555 differ from other L3 genomes by at least 15 separate insertions/deletions. All four genomes have features common to temperate phages, including genes encoding putative repressors (e.g., Krypton555 38) and integrases (e.g., Krypton555 36); attP sites have not been identified. Functional assignments are predicted for up to 40% of the gene products.

Clautastrophe, Kingsolomon, and Nicholas have deletions near their right genome ends relative to Krypton555 and other subcluster L3 phages, missing approximately 4.3 kbp, 6.1 kbp, and 6.1 kbp, respectively. This region is characterized by multiple copies of different repeat sequences. For example, Krypton555 contains four identical copies of both 5′-TACACGCCGTGACCG and 5′-CGGAGCTGCTTGGTT, many of which are missing from the other three genomes. The roles of these repeat sequences are unknown, but they could be involved in the regulation of early lytic gene expression, which is predicted to initiate near the right genome end. Although most of the genes deleted from Clautastrophe, Kingsolomon, and Nicholas are of unknown function, one deleted gene present in Krypton555 and the L3 phages Lumos, Snenia, and Whirlwind codes for an MCM2-like AAATPase, which is presumably not essential for lytic growth in these phages.

Accession number(s).

The nucleotide sequence accession numbers are MF140405 for Clautastrophe, MF140413 for Kingsolomon, MF140414 for Krypton555, and MF140421 for Nicholas.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by a grant from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (54308198) to G.F.H. We thank the SEA-PHAGES community, the Dean’s Office of Hal Marcus College of Science and Engineering, and the Office of Undergraduate Research of University of West Florida for their support, and Xavier University of Louisiana for support via the Claude H. and Elizabeth Organ Professorship held by J.F.R.

Footnotes

Citation Chung H-M, D’Elia T, Ross JF, Alvarado SM, Brantley M-C, Bricker LP, Butler CR, Crist C, Dane JM, Farran BW, Hobbs S, Lapak M, Lovell C, Ludergnani N, McMullen A, Mirza SA, Thrift N, Vaughan DP, Worley G, Ejikemeuwa A, Zaw M, Albritton CF, Bertrand SC, Chaudhry SS, Cheema VA, Do C, Do ML, Duong HM, El-Desoky DH, Green KM, Lee RN, Thornton LA, Vu JM, Zahra MN, Cresawn SG, Stoner TH, Garlena RA, Jacobs-Sera D, Pope WH, Russell DA, Hatfull GF. 2017. Complete genome sequences of mycobacteriophages Clautastrophe, Kingsolomon, Krypton555, and Nicholas. Genome Announc 5:e01129-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01129-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hatfull GF. 2014. Molecular genetics of mycobacteriophages. Microbiol Spectr 2:1–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pope WH, Bowman CA, Russell DA, Jacobs-Sera D, Asai DJ, Cresawn SG, Jacobs WR, Hendrix RW, Lawrence JG, Hatfull GF, Science Education Alliance Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics, Evolutionary Science, Phage Hunters Integrating Research and Education, Mycobacterial Genetics Course . 2015. Whole genome comparison of a large collection of mycobacteriophages reveals a continuum of phage genetic diversity. Elife 4:e06416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Russell DA, Hatfull GF. 2017. PhagesDB: the actinobacteriophage database. Bioinformatics 33:784–786. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gordon D, Green P. 2013. Consed: a graphical editor for next-generation sequencing. Bioinformatics 29:2936–2937. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cresawn SG, Bogel M, Day N, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2011. Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 12:395. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Besemer J, Borodovsky M. 2005. GeneMark: web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W451–W454. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W244–W248. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, Ren J, Li WW, Noble WS. 2009. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res 37:W202–W208. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ripma LA, Simpson MG, Hasenstab-Lehman K. 2014. Geneious! Simplified genome skimming methods for phylogenetic systematic studies: a case study in Oreocarya (Boraginaceae). Appl Plant Sci 2:apps.1400062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES