Abstract
Archaeal viruses have evolved to infect hosts often thriving in extreme conditions such as high temperatures. However, there is a paucity of information on archaeal virion structures, genome packaging, and determinants of temperature resistance. The rod-shaped virus APBV1 (Aeropyrum pernix bacilliform virus 1) is among the most thermostable viruses known; it infects a hyperthermophile Aeropyrum pernix, which grows optimally at 90 °C. Here we report the structure of APBV1, determined by cryo-electron microscopy at near-atomic resolution. Tight packing of the major virion glycoprotein (VP1) is ensured by extended hydrophobic interfaces, and likely contributes to the extreme thermostability of the helical capsid. The double-stranded DNA is tightly packed in the capsid as a left-handed superhelix and held in place by the interactions with positively charged residues of VP1. The assembly is closed by specific capping structures at either end, which we propose to play a role in DNA packing and delivery.
The rod-shaped virus APBV1 is among the most thermostable viruses known. Here, Ptchelkine et al. determine its structure at near-atomic resolution, show that the DNA is packed as left-handed superhelix and identify extended hydrophobic interfaces that likely contribute to the extreme thermostability of the capsid.
Introduction
Geothermal environments with temperatures exceeding 80 °C represent the habitat of DNA viruses with a remarkable diversity of shapes, which along with ubiquitous icosahedral and filamentous particles encompass virions resembling bottles, spindles, droplets, and coils—shapes not observed among viruses in environments with lower temperatures1,2. The hosts of all these viruses are hyperthermophilic members of the domain Archaea. The unusual morphotypes of hyperthermophilic archaeal viruses appear to be determined by exceptional ways of genome packaging and virion morphogenesis, which apparently also secure the stability of virions in extreme conditions of the natural environments1. Virion structures of the icosahedral virus STIV and the filamentous viruses SIRV2 and AFV1 of the hyperthermophilic archaeal order Sulfolobales have been described at high resolution3–5. However, many aspects determining the high thermostability of hyperthermophilic archaeal viruses remain to be elucidated.
An excellent model for such studies is the non-enveloped bacilliform virus APBV1 infecting the archaeon Aeropyrum pernix that has the highest optimal growth temperature, 90 °C, among aerobic hyperthermophiles6. The double-stranded, circular DNA genome of the virus (5.3 kbp) is among the smallest known dsDNA genomes7. It encodes for the major capsid protein (MCP) VP1 (8.3 kDa) in addition to three minor capsid proteins VP2 (9.7 kDa), VP3 (11.2 kDa), and VP4 (21.4 kDa). In the virion, the MCP is glycosylated6.
To study the molecular basis of the extreme temperature resistance of APBV1, we have determined the three-dimensional structure of the purified APBV1 virion using electron cryomicroscopy (cryo-EM) to ~3-Å resolution. The structure reveals how the MCPs pack tightly together forming a tubular structure with a hydrophobic core inside the wall of the tube. The inner surface of the tube is positively charged to allow efficient interactions with the circular dsDNA genome. Together, these interactions stabilize the virus particle. The structure allows us to propose an assembly model where the dsDNA genome and capsid assemble in a concerted fashion.
Results
Structure of the APBV1 virion reveals helical symmetry
APBV1 viral particles appear as rods that are 1430 Å long and 158 Å in diameter (Fig. 1a). Small punctate densities (~30 Å long) were observed protruding on the sides of the particle (Fig. 1b, c). One end of the particle appeared pointy and the other end more rounded as has been observed by electron microscopy of negatively stained specimens earlier6. Initial cryo-EM micrographs collected using a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera did not reveal sufficient signal for structure determination, presumably due to the small size of the major capsid protein VP1 (8.3-kDa) and the absence of prominent features on the surface of the particle to assist alignment. Subsequent data collected on a direct electron detector increased the signal-to-noise ratio and allowed further analysis (Supplementary Table 1). Particles were computationally cut into overlapping segments, which were then treated as single particles (Supplementary Table 2). Two-dimensional image classification of the segments and Fourier–Bessel analysis of power spectra calculated from 2D class averages (Supplementary Fig. 1) revealed a defined helical symmetry (rise 6.10 Å, turn 16.55 degrees, 21.75 units per turn, pitch 133.7 Å), cyclic symmetry (C5), and the polar nature of the capsid structure. The 3D density map of the particle was determined using iterative real-space helical reconstruction8,9 to an average resolution of 3.8 Å (Supplementary Fig. 2). Local resolution analysis indicated that most of the helical capsid was resolved to 3.0 Å (Supplementary Fig. 3).
VP1 subunits assemble via extensive hydrophopic interfaces
In the cryo-EM map, the fold of the VP1 glycoprotein and the density for most of the large amino acid side-chains were resolved, allowing us to build a VP1 atomic model de novo and refine it (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 3). VP1 is almost entirely α-helical, consisting of two long α-helices (α1, residues 5–42; α2, residues 53–77) linked by a type 1 beta hairpin (residues 43–52), and flexible termini (N-term, residues 1–4; C-term, 78–81). Two adjacent prolines (Pro25 and Pro26) mediate a kink in α1, which facilitated initial assignment of the sequence to the density. α2 is also curved at Gly66, but to lesser extent than α1.
The arrangement of the VP1 subunits in the capsid resembles the blades of an impeller (Fig. 1d, e; Supplementary Fig. 4), with the small size of the VP1 protein, and more specifically the curvature of the VP1 α-helices α1 and α2, allowing very compact packing of subunits. Most amino acid side-chains in both α1 and α2 helices are hydrophobic, and only the inner and outer ends of the subunits contain polar and charged residues. Each VP1 subunit makes extensive hydrophobic contacts to six other neighboring VP1 subunits, resulting in a large interface area of 2916 Å2 (55.5% of the total solvent accessible area of the subunit)10. The total contribution to the free energy of the VP1 heptamer formation from hydophobic interactions would be 70 kcal mol−1 according to the model proposed earlier11,12. A large number of aliphatic residues pack closely with each other, with Leu14, Leu21, Ala24, Met28, Ala31, and Val35 of α1 packing against Met61, Leu68, Val69, Leu73, and Ile76 of α2 to form a very tight hydrophobic interface (Fig. 2). Our analysis suggests that this interface contributes to APBV1 stability at high temperature. Interestingly, SIRV2, a rod-shaped extremophile, also uses extensive hydrophobic interfaces in its capsid assembly and stabilization4.
Glycosylation sequon of VP1 lies in the solvent exposed loop
The VP1 beta hairpin is solvent accessible on the outer surface of the virus, and consists largely of polar (Ser43, Thr45, Asn47, Thr49, and Thr50) and charged (Asp52) residues. VP1 is glycosylated6, and sequence analysis using NetNGlyc13 revealed an N-linked glycosylation sequon (46-NST-50) located at the tip of the loop region (Supplementary Fig. 5). This sequon (NXS/T) has also been found in an archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius 14. This archeon and the host of APBV1 (Aeropyrum pernix) are both members of the same phylum, Crenarchaeota. Additional densities, preferentially located at the two ends of the helical assembly (Fig. 1b, c and Supplementary Fig. 6) could be glycans, suggesting either preferential incorporation of glycosylated VP1 subunits at these positions or site-directed glycosylation in the context of the assembled particle. No consistent glycan density was observed at this position in the helical reconstruction, suggesting this position is only partially glycosylated. The presence of small punctate densities at the sides of individual particles suggests that a minority of the VP1 chains are also glycosylated in the helical part of the capsid, apparently at random and at a low frequency (Supplementary Fig. 1). Glycosylated peptides or other post-translational modifications were not observed in MS/MS analysis, consistent with their apparent low frequency.
The genome of APBV1 is packaged as a left-handed superhelix
Previous studies have shown that APBV1 genome is circular double-stranded DNA6. APBV1 virions assemble at extreme temperatures (90–100 °C)6, raising a question how the viral DNA is stabilized during assembly and in the virion. Repeated experiments showed that APBV1 DNA is in circular nicked, and therefore relaxed, form, contrary to the conclusions of our previous study where the DNA band of linearized genome had been assigned as supercoiled DNA6 (Supplementary Fig. 7). Our cryo-EM structure reveals the organization of the APBV1 DNA genome and the VP1 residues that interact with it. Five helical densities line the inner surface of the capsid, and were best resolved when the map was low-pass filtered, suggesting that they arise from a component that is less well ordered than the VP1 capsid (Fig. 3a, b). Additional density, a tube with a diameter of ~36 Å, is present on the central axis of the helical capsid (Supplementary Fig. 8). We attribute these densities to the viral genome. Although the density map does not direct assignment of the VP1–DNA contacts, or an unambiguous determination of the DNA conformation, it suggests that the DNA follows the positively charged helical tracks formed by the VP1 residues Lys9 and Arg79 exposed on the inner surface of the helical capsid (Fig. 3a, b). The spacing of these basic residues along the helical tracks, is consistent with the spacing of phosphates along a B-DNA duplex. Only a fraction of DNA phosphate groups, however, makes contacts to the inner surface of the protein capsid and we predict that the DNA is likely to be fully hydrated, consistent with the B-form conformation. The curvature is, in fact, very similar to that observed in the eukaryotic nucleosome. In other helical archaeal viruses, SIRV24 and AFV15, the DNA is wrapped up by capsid proteins, and is in a relatively dehydrated A-form conformation.
The observed density, therefore, suggests that the DNA is packaged inside the capsid as a left-handed superhelix. Each of the five superhelical DNA segments that run the length of the particle would encompass a fragment of the viral genome of 808 bp according to the measured length of these densities (assuming B-form DNA). These five segments, therefore, would amount to 1238 bp less than the length of the full viral genome (5278 bp). Since the particle must package the full genome, and the circular DNA must have an even number of passes running up and down the particle, the central density observed along the axis is likely to correspond to a sixth pass of DNA (Supplementary Fig. 8). This part of the genome is not well defined in the cryo-EM map. However, it is likely to adopt a highly compact form to package all residual DNA not accounted for in the helical tracks. The polarity of the DNA must then be in the same sense in three of the helical tracks and reverse in the other two tracks and the central axis.
Cap assemblies terminate the APBV1 capsid
How is the helical region of the capsid capped to form the mature particle? We reconstructed 3D structures of the capsid tips using single particle averaging and imposing five-fold symmetry (Supplementary Table 2). The two tips have distinct cap assemblies, earlier denoted as “pointy” and “blunt”, and were both resolved to ~8 Å resolution. The pointy end is characterized by terminal fibers with five globular protruding domains (Fig. 4a). The terminal fibers have been shown to mediate receptor binding and cell entry in the case of the rod-shaped virus SIRV215. The other end of APBV1 is devoid of fibers and has a more rounded appearance (Fig. 4b). Both tips are built from the subunits that appear structurally homologous to VP1. Minor protein VP2 shares 28% sequence identity (52% similarity) with VP1 and structure prediction16 showed that the two are likely to have the same fold (Supplementary Fig. 5). It is thus conceivable that either or both of the caps are formed by VP2. Interestingly, only one of the two prolines (Pro25) is conserved in VP2, suggesting that the helix α1 may not be kinked the same way as in VP1. This in turn might explain the slight twist in the packing of the subunits forming the caps, when compared to VP1 in the helical region of the particle. VP2 may have evolved from VP1 by gene duplication to provide the capping function and added stability to the viral particle. While the map of the pointy tip was poorly defined, we could dock the individual subunits in the map of the blunt tip, using the VP1 model as a substitute for the unassigned tip protein (Fig. 4b, c). The structure consists of five levels of subunits related only by five-fold symmetry. While the tilt of the subunits increases, the radius of the cap reduces with each level and the last five subunits are brought together to close up the structure. Possible structural switches that transition the helical arrangement of VP1 subunits in the capsid to the more tilted arrangement of subunits in the cap regions remain to be determined in higher resolution cap structures.
Discussion
The full model of the viral particle allows us to suggest an assembly model for APBV1. In this model, one of the caps would recognize the viral genome at three specific sites, appropriately spaced along the DNA, creating three long loops. These could intertwine under the guidance of concomitant VP1 capsid assembly, to form the observed left-handed one-in-the-middle superhelical organization in a concerted fashion. VP1 assembly into a helical capsid would proceed only together with DNA and, therefore, stop after all DNA has been covered. The open end would then be capped by minor protein(s). This assembly model makes the following predictions: (i) VP1 would be unable to form empty helical capsids in the absence of DNA, or this would be very inefficient, (ii) packaging signals should be present in the sequence, and optimally spaced by approximately twice the length of the particle, to create a virus with the observed defined length, and (iii) particles with ~2× the length should be observed if only two of the three packing signals are bound in the initiation of packaging, leading to an assembly where four of the five helical tracks are occupied (and 3× if only one of the three packing signals is bound and two of the five helical tracks are occupied). In our initial search of the DNA sequence, obvious putative packaging signals were not evident and there may not be enough data to find a consensus sequence. Consistent with our assembly model, empty particles devoid of DNA were not observed in our preparations and double length particles are occasionally observed6.
In conclusion, the tight hydrophobic core of the VP1 layer and extensive Coulombic interactions between VP1 termini and the negatively supercoiled DNA genome facilitate assembly of the ABPV1 particle with extreme thermostability. The extent of these contacts and the fact that empty particles were not observed points to a concerted assembly model where VP1 and genome condense together. The exact molecular interactions in the capping structures and the interaction of the virion with its archaeal host remain to be determined in further studies.
Methods
Virus propagation and purification
APBV16 was propagated in A. pernix strain K117. Virions were collected from cell-free supernatant by precipitation with polyethylene glycol and purified by CsCl density gradient centrifugation in a Beckman SW60 rotor at 48,000 rpm for 24 h. The virion-containing fractions were collected and dialyzed against distilled water.
Determination of genome superhelical state
DNA was isolated from purified APBV1 virions following a slightly modified phenol–chloroform extraction protocol18 as described earlier6. The viral DNA genome was treated with different concentrations of mung bean nuclease (MBN-1: 30 U µg−1 DNA, MBN-2: 20 U µg−1 DNA, and MBN-3: 10 U µg−1 DNA) and incubated for 30 min at 30 °C. The DNA digestion products were separated on 1% agarose gel and identified with SYBR Safe stain.
Electron cryomicroscopy
A 3-μl aliquot of sample was applied to a glow-discharged grid (C-flat; Protochips, Raleigh, NC) at ambient temperature and ~80% relative humidity and vitrified by plunge-freezing into liquid ethane using a vitrification apparatus (CP3, Gatan, Pleasanton, CA). Data were acquired using a 300-kV transmission electron microscope (Tecnai F30 ‘Polara’; FEI) equipped with an energy filter (slit width 20 eV; GIF Quantum, Gatan) and a direct electron detector (K2 Summit, Gatan). Movies (22 frames, each frame 0.2 s) were collected in electron counting mode at dose rate of 8 e– pixel−1 s−1 at calibrated magnification of 37,037× resulting in a total dose of ~22 e– Å−2 and pixel size of 1.35 Å.
Movie frames were aligned to account for drift using Motioncorr19 and contrast transfer function (CTF) parameters were estimated using CTFFIND320. A total of 400 drift-corrected micrographs were used to pick 3145 virus particles using e2helixboxer.py from EMAN2. Helical reconstruction was calculated in Spring9. Particles were segmented into overlapping segments, which were treated as single particles. Initial helical parameters were derived by layer-line analysis of 2D class averages to assign layer-line heights and Bessel orders. The parameters were refined by calculating amplitude correlation for a set of different parameters around the original ones21. The final map was calculated using iterative real-space gold-standard refinement.
The ends of the virus particle were reconstructed using Relion. An initial estimate for the in-plane rotation (psi) was calculated from the original coordinates of the helix ends and all filament ends were subjected to 2D classification in a template-free manner. Centering of the helix ends was improved by manually defining the particle centers in the class averages, which allowed us to calculate more accurate particle coordinates in the micrographs and re-extract them for a second round of 2D classification. The 2D classification separated the filament ends into a set of pointed ends and a set of rounded ends. For 3D refinement of particles in both sets, initial models were calculated using relion_reconstruct. First, out-of-the-plane rotation (tilt) was set to 90° and the angle around the long axis of the filament (rot) was set to a random value. Gold standard local refinement was run for both sets restricting deviations from the initial psi and tilt angles by sigma value of 2° and 4°, respectively. Initial refinements run without applying symmetry confirmed the presence of C5 symmetry in both ends and C5 symmetry was applied in subsequent refinements.
Resolution of the models was estimated by using Fourier shell correlation in Relion using 0.143-cutoff and phase randomization to account for masking effects22. Local resolution was estimated using ResMap23. Reconstruction statistics are summarized in Supplementary Table 2.
A 2D class average of the complete particle was created in Relion. Extracted particles were downsampled by factor of 2× resulting in a box size of 700 pixels and pixel size of 2.7 Å pixel−1. The final average of particles in the best class was calculated in relion_reconstruct up to 1/8 Å−1 spatial frequency.
Atomic model building and refinement
An atomic model for VP1 in the helical part of the filament was traced with Buccaneer24, built with Coot25, and refined in Refmac26 and Phenix27 applying secondary structure, rotamer, and Ramachandran plot restraints. The ends of the filament were modeled in COOT by jelly-body fitting several copies of the VP1 atomic model. The refinement and geometry of the models were validated with Refmac26 and MOLPROBITY28. Model refinement statistics are summarized in Supplementary Table 3.
Data availability
Density maps and atomic models reported in this paper have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Database and in the Protein Databank under accession codes EMD-3857 (helical capsid reconstruction), EMD-3858 (blunt end reconstruction), EMD-3859 (pointy end reconstruction), and PDB:5OXE (VP1 atomic model). The authors declare that all other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files, or are available from the authors upon request.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The OPIC electron microscopy facility was founded by a Wellcome Trust JIF award (060208/Z/00/Z) and is supported by a WT equipment grant (093305/Z/10/Z). Work in D.P.’s laboratory is supported by l'Agence Nationale de la Recherche (France) and by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement 685778, project VIRUS-X. Work in J.T.H.’s laboratory is supported by European Research Council (649053) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program. The Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics is supported by a Wellcome Trust Core Award (203141/Z/16/Z).
Author contributions
D.Pr., S.E.V.P. and J.T.H. designed the study. D.Pt., A.G. and J.T.H. performed cryo-EM data collection. D.Pt. and J.T.H. reconstructed EM maps. D.Pt. built and refined atomic models. T.M., S.L.-S. and Y.L. optimized the procedure, purified APBV1 virus, and performed genome folding-assessment assays. M.K. performed sequence analysis. D.Pt., S.E.V.P., D.Pr. and J.T.H. wrote and all authors commented on the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01668-0.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Simon E. V. Phillips, Email: Simon.Phillips@rc-harwell.ac.uk
David Prangishvili, Email: david.prangishvili@pasteur.fr.
Juha T. Huiskonen, Email: juha@strubi.ox.ac.uk
References
- 1.Prangishvili D. The wonderful world of archaeal viruses. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2013;67:565–585. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dellas N, Snyder JC, Bolduc B, Young MJ. Archaeal viruses: diversity, replication, and structure. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2014;1:399–426. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-031413-085357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Veesler D, et al. Atomic structure of the 75 MDa extremophile Sulfolobus turreted icosahedral virus determined by CryoEM and X-ray crystallography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:5504–5509. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300601110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.DiMaio F, et al. Virology. A virus that infects a hyperthermophile encapsidates A-form DNA. Science. 2015;348:914–917. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kasson P, et al. Model for a novel membrane envelope in a filamentous hyperthermophilic virus. Elife. 2017;6:e26268. doi: 10.7554/eLife.26268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mochizuki T, et al. Diversity of viruses of the hyperthermophilic archaeal genus Aeropyrum, and isolation of the Aeropyrum pernix bacilliform virus 1, APBV1, the first representative of the family Clavaviridae. Virology. 2010;402:347–354. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.03.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Prangishvili D, Garrett RA, Koonin EV. Evolutionary genomics of archaeal viruses: unique viral genomes in the third domain of life. Virus Res. 2006;117:52–67. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Egelman EH. The iterative helical real space reconstruction method: surmounting the problems posed by real polymers. J. Struct. Biol. 2007;157:83–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Desfosses A, Ciuffa R, Gutsche I, Sachse C. SPRING - an image processing package for single-particle based helical reconstruction from electron cryomicrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 2014;185:15–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Krissinel E, Henrick K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 2007;372:774–797. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chothia C. Hydrophobic bonding and accessible surface area in proteins. Nature. 1974;248:338–339. doi: 10.1038/248338a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Janin J, Bahadur RP, Chakrabarti P. Protein-protein interaction and quaternary structure. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2008;41:133–180. doi: 10.1017/S0033583508004708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gupta R, Brunak S. Prediction of glycosylation across the human proteome and the correlation to protein function. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2002;7:310–322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Peyfoon E, et al. The S-layer glycoprotein of the crenarchaeote Sulfolobus acidocaldarius is glycosylated at multiple sites with chitobiose-linked N-glycans. Archaea. 2010;2010:754101. doi: 10.1155/2010/754101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Quemin ERJ, et al. First insights into the entry process of hyperthermophilic archaeal viruses. J. Virol. 2013;87:13379–13385. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02742-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yang J, et al. The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Methods. 2015;12:7–8. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sako Y, et al. Aeropyrum pernix gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon growing at temperatures up to 100 degrees C. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1996;46:1070–1077. doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-4-1070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sambrook, J. & Russell, D. W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY, USA, 2001).
- 19.Li X, et al. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat. Methods. 2013;10:584–590. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mindell JA, Grigorieff N. Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 2003;142:334–347. doi: 10.1016/S1047-8477(03)00069-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sachse C. Single-particle based helical reconstruction—how to make the most of real and Fourier space. AIMS Biophys. 2015;2:219–244. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.2.219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chen S, et al. High-resolution noise substitution to measure overfitting and validate resolution in 3D structure determination by single particle electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy. 2013;135:24–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kucukelbir A, Sigworth FJ, Tagare HD. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:63–65. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cowtan K. The Buccaneer software for automated model building. 1. Tracing protein chains. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2006;62:1002–1011. doi: 10.1107/S0907444906022116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004;60:2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brown A, et al. Tools for macromolecular model building and refinement into electron cryo-microscopy reconstructions. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2015;71:136–153. doi: 10.1107/S1399004714021683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Adams PD, et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010;66:213–221. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Davis IW, et al. MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W375–W383. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Density maps and atomic models reported in this paper have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Database and in the Protein Databank under accession codes EMD-3857 (helical capsid reconstruction), EMD-3858 (blunt end reconstruction), EMD-3859 (pointy end reconstruction), and PDB:5OXE (VP1 atomic model). The authors declare that all other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files, or are available from the authors upon request.