Abstract
The data presented in this article are related to the publication “Interaction of the red pigment-concentrating hormone of the crustacean Daphnia pulex, with its cognate receptor, Dappu-RPCHR: A nuclear magnetic resonance and modeling study” (Jackson et al., 2017) [1]. This article contains the data for homology modeling of the red pigment-concentrating hormone (RPCH) receptor of the water flea, Daphnia pulex (Dappu-RPCHR), which was constructed from its primary sequence. This is the first 3D model of a crustacean G-protein coupled receptor. Docking of the agonist, pGlu-Val-Asn-Phe-Ser-Thr-Ser-Trp amide (Dappu-RPCH), was used to find a binding pocket on the receptor and compared to the binding pocket of the adipokinetic hormone (AKH) receptor from the malaria mosquito. Data for the receptor, with and without loop refinement, together with the docked agonist, are presented.
Keywords: Daphnia pulex, Red pigment-concentrating hormone, Homology modeling, Molecular docking
Specifications Table [Please fill in right-hand column of the table below.]
Subject area | Chemistry, biochemistry, physiology |
More specific subject area | Invertebrate neuroendocrinology |
Type of data | Table, figure, text files |
How data was acquired | Molecular modeling, using Modeler 9v7[2], Autodock Vina [3], GROMACS version 4.5.5 [4] |
Data format | Raw, Analyzed |
Experimental factors | Primary sequence Genbank (EU503126.1) |
Template selection with GPCR-ModSim Web server | |
Modeler 9v7 used to construct 100, 3D models of the receptor with the input parameters set to generate 100 models with loop refinement. | |
Quality checked with PROCHECK [5] and ERRAT [6] | |
Ligand docking using Autodock Vina[2] with a grid space of 44 × 24 × 40. | |
Molecular dynamics with GROMACS [4] | |
Experimental features | Homology modeling of primary sequence of Daphnia pulex RPCH receptor and docking of agonist |
Data source location | |
Data accessibility | Data are with the article |
Related research article | Graham E. Jackson, Elumalai Pavadai, Gerd Gäde, Zaheer Timol and Niels H. Andersen, Interaction of the red pigment-concentrating hormone of the crustacean Daphnia pulex, with its cognate receptor, Dappu-RPCHR: A nuclear magnetic resonance and modeling study. |
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.103 |
Value of the Data
-
•
This is the first model of a crustacean G-protein coupled receptor
-
•
This is the first comparison of homology modelling of a crustacean GPCR and an insect GPCR.
-
•
This data allows others to extend the study to other agonists and crustacean GPCRs.
-
•
This is the first study of hormone docking to a crustacean receptor. The final docked position was very similar, but not identical, to other GPCR/ligand complexes.
1. Data
The raw data for the Dappu-RPCH receptor [1], with and without loop refinement, together with the docked agonist are given in protein database (pdb) format as supplementary data. Fig. 1 shows the primary sequence of the receptor, which was obtained from Anders [7]. This sequence compares closely to the Genbank sequence (EU503126.1) with 97.2% sequence identity. The GPCRpred server predicts that this receptor belongs to the CLASS A, rhodopsin superfamily, of G-protein coupled receptors.
Fig. 2 shows the MEMSAT-SVM and MEMSAT3 [8] analysis of the primary sequence data of Dappu-RPCHR. Seven transmembrane helices are predicted with a short N-terminus and long C-terminus. Helix 1 runs from residue 4–22; helix 2 residue 37–58; helix 3 residue 71 – 96; helix 4 residue 118–135; helix 5 residue 164–186; helix 6 residue 221–224 and helix 7 residue 260–281.
Fig. 3 shows the sequence alignment of Dappu-RPCHR with the crystal structures of β2AR (PDB id: 2RH1). The coloring scheme indicates the degree of similarity at each alignment column; identical (strong blue background), strongly similar (light blue background), weakly similar (very light blue background) and non-matching residues (white background). Experimentally determined secondary structures for β2AR are color coded, with helices in red, strands in blue, and coils in beige. The seven transmembrane helices (TM1-TM7) are highlighted and highly conserved residues among Class A GPCRs in β2AR and Dappu-RPCHR are represented in green colored boxes.
Fig. 4 shows a Ramachandran plot of the Dappu-RPCHR model. Of the model residues, 89.2% occupy the core regions (red), 7.5% occupy allowed regions (yellow), 2.6% occupy generously allowed regions (light yellow), and 0.7% occupy disallowed regions (white).
Fig. 5 shows the evaluation of the Dappu-RPCHR model by the Verify3D program [9]. Residues with positive compatibility score show that the model is reasonably folded.
Fig. 6 shows the molecular dynamics of the agonist, Dappu-RPCH in water. The figure shows the molecule jumping between its two major clusters.
Fig. 7 shows an overlay of the receptor Dappu-RPCHR (cyan) and the AKH receptor (green) (Anoga-HrTHR) of the malaria mosquito, A. gambiae [10]. Fig. 7(B) shows an overlay of their respective agonists, Dappu-RPCH and Anoga-HrTH.
Since the β-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) was used as the template during the construction of Dappu-RPCHR it is interesting to compare the binding of agonists to these two receptors. Carazolol is a high affinity agonist of β2AR. Fig. 8 shows a comparison of the predicted binding sites for Dappu-RPCH in Dappu-RPCHR and carazolol in β2AR.
2. Experimental design, materials, and methods
The primary sequence of the Dappu-RPCH receptor was obtained from Anders [7]. The class of GPCR and trans-membrane (TM) helix predictions were computed on-line using (http://www.imtech.res.in/raghava/gpcrpred/) [12] and (http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psipred/) respectively.
The GPCR-ModSim Web server (http://gpcr-modsim.org/) [13] was used for template selection and preliminary sequence alignment. Modeler 9v7 [2] was used to construct 3D models of the receptor. The quality of the constructed model was evaluated for its internal consistency and reliability using a Ramachandran plot and checking the quality of non-bonded atom interactions by ERRAT [6]. Autodock Vina [3] was used for peptide docking with a grid space of 44 × 24 × 40, which covered all extracellular loops and helices. The top-ranked docking poses were further optimized, using the MM-GBSA method (Prime version 2.1, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2009).
Acknowledgments
This work is based on the research supported in part by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant numbers 93450 and 85466 to GEJ and 85768 to GG) and the University of Cape Town Research Committee (453509).
Footnotes
Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at 10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.045.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at 10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.045.
Transparency document. Supplementary material
.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
.
.
.
References
- 1.Jackson Graham E., Pavadai Elumalai, Gäde Gerd, Timol Zaheer, Andersen Niels H. Interaction of the red pigment-concentrating hormone of the crustacean Daphnia pulex, with its cognate receptor, Dappu-RPCHR: a nuclear magnetic resonance and modeling study. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sali A., Blundell T.L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 1993;234:779–815. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Trott O., Olson A.J. Software news and update AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 2010;31:455–461. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Van Der Spoel D., Lindahl E., Hess B., Groenhof G., Mark A.E., Berendsen H.J.C. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J. Comput. Chem. 2005;26:1701–1718. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Laskowski R.A., Rullmann J.A.C., MacArthur M.W., Kaptein R., Thornton J.M. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J. Biomol. NMR. 1996;8:477–486. doi: 10.1007/BF00228148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Colovos C., Yeates T.O. Verification of protein structures: patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Protein Sci. 1993;2:1511–1519. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560020916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Anders L. University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; 2012. Molecular Biological Studies on Neuropeptides of The Adipokinetic Hormone/ed Pigment-concentrating Hormone Family and The Neuroparsin Family in the Arthropod Sister Groups of Insects and Crustaceans (M.Sc. thesis) [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nugent T., Jones D.T. Transmembrane protein topology prediction using support vector machines. BMC Bioinform. 2009;10 doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Eisenberg D., Lüthy R., Bowie J.U. VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Methods Enzymol. 1997;277:396–406. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(97)77022-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mugumbate G., Jackson G.E., van der Spoel D., Koever K.E., Szilagyi L. Anopheles gambiae, Anoga-HrTH hormone, free and bound structure - A nuclear magnetic resonance experiment. Peptides. 2013;41:94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2013.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vilar S., Ferino G., Phatak S.S., Berk B., Cavasotto C.N., Costanzi S. Docking-based virtual screening for ligands of G protein-coupled receptors: not only crystal structures but also in silico models. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2011;29:614–623. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2010.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bhasin M., Raghava G.P.S. GPCRpred: an SVM-based method for prediction of families and subfamilies of G-protein coupled receptors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:W383–W389. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rodríguez D., Bello X., Gutiérrez-De-Terán H. Molecular modelling of G protein-coupled receptors through the web. Mol. Inform. 2012;31:334–341. doi: 10.1002/minf.201100162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.