Abstract
Renal angiomyolipomas (AML) contain an admixture of clonal tumour cells with features of several different mesenchymal lineages, implying the existence of an unidentified AML neoplastic stem cell. Biallelic inactivation of TSC2 or TSC1 is believed to represent the driving event in these tumours. Here we show that TSC2 knockdown transforms senescence-resistant cultured mouse and human renal epithelial cells into neoplastic stem cells that serially propagate renal AML-like tumours in mice. mTOR inhibitory therapy of mouse AML allografts mimics the clinical responses of human renal AMLs. Deletion of Tsc1 in mouse renal epithelia causes differentiation in vivo into cells expressing characteristic AML markers. Human renal AML and a renal AML cell line express proximal tubule markers. We describe the first mouse models of renal AML and provide evidence that these mesenchymal tumours originate from renal proximal tubule epithelial cells, uncovering an unexpected pathological differentiation plasticity of the proximal tubule.
Renal angiomyolipomas (AML) contain a mix of clonal tumour cells. Here, through reverse tumour engineering experiments, mouse genetics and analyses of human AML tumours, the authors provide evidence that these mesenchymal tumours originate from renal proximal tubule epithelial cells.
Introduction
Renal angiomyolipomas (AML) are benign, but life-threatening neoplasms that contain variable admixtures of tumour cells that are histologically and molecularly similar to vascular (angio-), smooth muscle (myo-) and fat (lipo-) lineages1. Genetic analyses have shown that these different cell types within an individual AML are clonal2,3, indicating that they must be derived from a common tumour-initiating cell that has the capacity to differentiate into these different lineages, suggestive of a putative neoplastic stem cell. However, the identities and characteristics of the normal cell of origin of AML and of the presumptive AML stem cell remain unknown. Renal AML cells also express molecular markers of the melanocyte lineage4,5, which serve as clinical diagnostic markers. As embryonic neural crest stem cells or neural crest-derived progenitor cells from the adult skin can differentiate to form melanocytes, adipocytes and smooth muscle cells6–8, the cell type of origin of renal AML has been proposed to be an unidentified kidney-resident, neural crest-derived lineage5. Others have suggested that myoblasts9, pericytes10 or lymphatic endothelium11 represent the AML cell of origin. It is also possible that another renal cell type could become transformed and reprogrammed to form a neoplastic AML stem cell. In this context is noteworthy that a rare variant of AML, called AMLEC (AML with epithelial cysts) contains epithelial tubular or cystic structures12. While it has not yet been conclusively proven, there is some evidence that these epithelial structures may be tumour-derived13,14, implying that the putative AML or AMLEC neoplastic stem cell may also have the capacity to differentiate into renal epithelial cells in some cases.
Multiple and bilateral renal AMLs develop in up to 80% of patients with the autosomal dominant tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) syndrome (also known as Bourneville–Pringle disease), affecting ~1 in 6,000 newborns4. AMLs represent the most common cause of mortality in adult TSC patients due to spontaneous haemorrhage of abnormal tumour vasculature and can also cause significant morbidity by compressing adjacent normal kidney tissue, thereby impairing kidney function. TSC patients inherit a loss of function mutation in one allele of either of the TSC1 or TSC2 genes and AMLs in these patients almost always display somatic mutation of the wild type allele15–17. Roughly 80% of all renal AMLs arise sporadically in the general population, affecting ~0.6% of females and 0.3% of males18. These tumours also almost invariably display biallelic loss of TSC2 or more rarely of TSC115–17,19. The TSC1 (also known as HAMARTIN) and TSC2 (also known as TUBERIN) proteins form a complex that negatively regulates the mTORC1 protein kinase complex, a key node in cellular signalling networks that control cellular growth and proliferation. Consistent with the oncogenic role of constitutive mTORC1 activation, everolimus, an inhibitor of mTORC1, causes regression of renal AMLs in many patients20 and this therapy isapproved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of TSC-associated renal AML. Despite the clear role of TSC1 and TSC2 mutation in the human disease, renal AMLs surprisingly did not develop in numerous mouse models involving homozygous or heterozygous deletion of Tsc1 or Tsc2 (reviewed in ref.21). However, inducible, ubiquitous Cre-mediated deletion of Tsc1 caused the development of small kidney lesions displaying several characteristic renal AML markers such as HMB45, Smooth Muscle Actin (SMA), CATHEPSIN K and VIMENTIN22, suggesting that these lesions might represent renal AML precursor lesions. The cell type that gave rise to these lesions was not determined.
In this study we utilised a reverse tumour-engineering approach in mouse and human cells to explore the cell of origin of renal AML. Surprisingly we identified that our renal AML tumour models derive from renal epithelial cells. We further showed that some cells in human renal AMLs, as well as a renal AML cell line, exhibit molecular features of renal proximal tubular epithelial cells. These findings argue that renal AMLs might derive from proximal tubule epithelial cells.
Results
Tsc2 and Cdkn2a loss converts renal cells into AML-forming cells
As renal AMLs are relatively genetically simple tumours that are characterised almost exclusively by recurrent TSC2 or TSC1 mutations19, we reasoned that it might be possible to reverse engineer renal AML starting from normal primary cells. We first utilised primary mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) to establish RNAi tools to knockdown Tsc1 and Tsc2. Infection with lentiviruses expressing shRNA-Tsc1 or shRNA-Tsc2 efficiently reduced TSC1 or TSC2 protein abundance, increased phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 (Ser240/244) and 4E-BP1 (Thr37/46), indicative of mTORC1 activation, and caused accumulation of HIF-1α and the HIF-1α inducible protein GLUT1 (Supplementary Fig. 1a), mimicking previously published effects of knockout of Tsc1 or Tsc2 in MEFs23–25. Tsc1 or Tsc2 knockdown also inhibited cellular proliferation and induced premature senescence (Supplementary Fig. 1b, c), another known consequence of loss of function of TSC1 or TSC224,25.
As the cell type of origin of renal AML is unknown, we prepared primary cultures from collagenase-digested whole mouse kidneys with the aim of simultaneously isolating different types of kidney cells and cultured them in renal epithelial cell medium. These cultures predominantly comprised E-CADHERIN-expressing epithelial cells with rare VIMENTIN-expressing cells (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). Knockdown of Tsc1 or Tsc2 in these cultures also caused rapid loss of proliferative capacity (data not shown). Knockdown of TSC2 in primary human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells similarly caused inhibition of proliferation and the flattened, spread cellular morphology that is characteristic of cellular senescence (data not shown). This loss of proliferative capacity, a common consequence of expression of oncogenes or loss of tumour suppressor genes in primary cell culture systems, represents a limitation to an ex vivo tumour engineering approach.
To overcome this problem we identified that Cdkn2a knockout in MEFs rescued senescence and induced cellular transformation upon knockdown of Tsc1 or Tsc2 (Supplementary Fig. 1d–i). Using this information we first observed that while cultures from wild type kidneys lost epithelial appearance upon passaging, cultures from Cdkn2afl/fl mice infected with a Cre-expressing adenoviral vector to delete Cdkn2a (hereafter designated Cdkn2a∆/∆ cells) maintained epithelial appearance, proliferated in culture (Fig. 1a) and formed colonies when plated at low density on plastic but did not form colonies in soft agar (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 2d). Infection of cultured Cdkn2a∆/∆ renal cells with lentiviruses expressing shRNA-Tsc1 or shRNA-Tsc2 increased the rate of proliferation (Fig. 1a) and allowed the formation of colonies in soft-agar (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 2d), indicative of cellular transformation. Similarly, infection of cultured renal cells from wild type mice with a lentiviral vector expressing both shRNA-Tsc2 and shRNA-Cdkn2a (shRNA-Tsc2 + Cdkn2a) (Supplementary Fig. 2c) increased proliferation rate compared with shRNA-Cdkn2a knockdown and allowed growth in soft agar (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 2e). Tsc2 knockdown or Cdkn2a knockdown or knockout alone did not cause cellular transformation (Fig. 1a, b), demonstrating the cooperativity of this genetic effect. Genotypes that grew in soft agar acquired the stem cell-like characteristic of growth as non-adherent spheres that could be serially passaged (Fig. 1c). Approximately 9% of cells from the total virus-infected cellular populations formed spheres. Importantly, when injected subcutaneously into female SCID-beige mice, shRNA-Tsc2/Cdkn2a∆/∆ (n = 12 injections) and shRNA-Tsc2 + Cdkn2a (n = 16 injections) sphere-selected cells formed slowly growing tumours within 1–2 months (Fig. 1d). Tumours did not grow in male mice, potentially consistent with the increased incidence of human renal AMLs in females compared to males18. Allograft tumours showed several histological similarities to human renal AML and comprised a mixture of mature adipose tissue, scattered blood vessels and spindle shaped cells (Fig. 1e). Many tumours additionally exhibited some epithelial tubular or cystic structures (Fig. 1e), although these made up only a very small component of the entire tumour. At the ultrastructural level, allograft tumours exhibited an expanded endoplasmic reticulum (Supplementary Fig. 3a–d) that is reminiscent of the expanded endoplasmic reticulum seen in human renal AML tumours26. Importantly, regions of adipocyte differentiation and spindle cells were immunoreactive for an antibody cocktail that recognises the melanocyte markers HMB45 and MART-1, for the melanocyte protein PMEL (the HMB45 antigen), SMA and VIMENTIN (Fig. 1f), reproducing the molecular characteristics that serve as diagnostic criteria for human renal AML. Approximately 15% of cells in our allograft tumours exhibited immunoreactivity for PMEL (Supplementary Fig. 3e). While the majority of cells in human renal AMLs typically stain strongly and diffusely for CATHEPSIN K27, our allograft tumours exhibited a weak diffuse cytoplasmic positivity with ~10% of cells exhibiting strong immunoreactivity for CATHEPSIN K (Fig. 1f). mRNA analysis demonstrated high levels of expression of the melanocyte genes Pmel, Tyrp1, Ctsk (encoding CATHEPSIN K) and Mlana (also known as Mart1, encoding the MART-1 antigen) in allografts compared to normal kidney (Supplementary Fig. 3g) and western blotting confirmed that allograft tumours expressed both PMEL and CATHEPSIN K (Supplementary Fig. 3h, i). Similarly to human renal AMLs, the allograft tumour cells were negative for the endothelial cell marker CD31, which instead labelled scattered dysmorphic blood vessels in the tumours (Fig. 1f). Human renal AMLs have been shown to harbour numerous cells that express PDGFRβ10 and allograft tumours exhibited a similar staining pattern (Fig. 1f). Human renal AMLs stain positively for the neural stem cell marker NG228 and our allograft tumours similarly exhibited diffuse NG2 immunoreactivty (Supplementary Fig. 4a). While mature normal adipocytes stain positively for S100, adipocytes in human renal AMLs typically do not express S100, but other non-adipocyte components of the tumour have been reported to stain positively in about 28% of renal AML cases29. Consistent with this, in our allograft tumours, adipocytes stained negatively for S100 and spindle shaped cells stained positively (Fig. 1f). In summary, these ex vivo genetically engineered cells derived from a kidney-resident cell type represent an allograft model that shares many histological and molecular features with human renal AML or AMLEC.
We next sought to determine whether the AML-like tumour and cellular phenotypes observed in our system are specifically related to the Tsc2 and Cdkn2a loss-of-function genotype or whether any genetic combination that causes transformation and sphere formation would give similar results. In the context of another research project that will be described in detail elsewhere, we discovered that the overexpression of the Myc oncogene in Adeno-Cre-treated renal cell cultures derived from Trp53fl/fl mice (Myc/Trp53∆/∆) causes the formation of spheres and these cells form tumours in allograft assays (Supplementary Fig. 4c–f). In contrast to the Tsc2/Cdkn2a AML-like tumours, Myc/Trp53∆/∆ allograft tumours grew as solid masses of epithelial-like cells, sometimes organised in a pseudo-acinar pattern. Tumour cells typically had low cytoplasmic volumes with enlarged prominent nuclei. No histological similarities with renal AML were evident and tumours showed no immunoreactivity for PMEL (Supplementary Fig. 3e, f), S100 or NG2 (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). These findings further support the specificity of the effect of Tsc2 loss-of-function in our engineered renal AML model system.
AML-forming cells have neoplastic stem cell properties
Given that AML-like tumours derived from our engineered cells comprise multiple different types of cells, as well as the previous proposal that AMLs arise from a neural crest-derived cell type5, we cultured shRNA-Tsc2/Cdkn2a∆/∆ sphere cells in specific adipocyte-, osteoblast-, neural crest- and epithelial- differentiation media to assess their capacity to form different cellular lineages in culture. Cells from spheres could be differentiated into cells that expressed markers of adipocytes (Nile Red and Oil-red-O staining), glia (GFAP), neurons (TUBULIN-β3), melanocytes (HMB45/MART-1), smooth muscle cells (SMA) and epithelial cells (E-CADHERIN) (Fig. 2a). The observation of a melanocyte-like phenotype was supported by the fact that shRNA-Tsc2 + Cdkn2a sphere cells that were differentiated in neural-crest differentiation medium showed similar positive staining for CATHEPSIN K, PMEL, MITF and MART-1 to the B16F1 melanoma cell line (Supplementary Fig. 5). Our findings based on stainings were supported by mRNA expression analyses (Fig. 2b) showing that adipocyte differentiation medium induced expression of the adipocyte-specific gene Lpl, osteoblast differentiation medium induced expression of the osteoblast-specific genes Sp7 and Bglap and neural crest differentiation medium induced the expression of the glial-specific gene Gfap and neuron-specific gene Tubb3. Undifferentiated spheres exhibit high levels of expression of epithelial-specific genes (see later results) including Kap and Vil1, which remained elevated when cultured in epithelial differentiation medium but were greatly reduced when cultured in the other differentiation media. To further demonstrate the specificity of this phenotype we differentiated shRNA-Tsc2 + Cdkn2a spheres in parallel with cultures of shRNA-Cdkn2a kidney cells (which do not form spheres) and cultures from Myc/Trp53∆/∆ sphere cells. Only the shRNA-Tsc2 + Cdkn2a spheres but not the two negative control cell lines could be differentiated into Nile Red or PMEL positive cells (Supplementary Fig. 6a) nor did the differentiated cultures upregulate any of the adipocyte, osteoblast or neural-crest lineage specific genes that are induced upon differentiation of shRNA-Tsc2 + Cdkn2a spheres (Supplementary Fig. 6b). The two negative control cell lines also showed no expression of PMEL by western blotting (Supplementary Fig. 6c).
To determine whether single cells within spheres have the stem cell characteristic of being able to differentiate into these multiple cellular lineages we disrupted cells from individual shRNA-Tsc2/Cdkn2a∆/∆ spheres and plated them as single cells. These single cells generated new spheres within 10 days and these were passaged to form clonal cell lines (termed SC1- SC6) (Fig. 2c). Four of six independent single cell-derived clonal lines derived from three independent starting spheres possessed the ability to differentiate into osteoblasts, adipocytes, glia and melanocytes in culture, assessed using stainings (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 7a) and mRNA expression (Supplementary Fig. 7b). These four clones also formed characteristic AML tumours in in vivo allograft assays (six tumours from six injections of each clone) (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 7c), showing regions of adipocyte differentiation, spindle cells, blood vessels and epithelial structures. These tumours showed similar patterns of immunoreactivityto tumours obtained from whole sphere populations when stained with antibodies against PMEL, SMA, PDGFRβ, CATHEPSIN K, NG2 and S100, as well as displayed E-CADHERIN positive epithelial structures (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Figs. 4a, b and 7c). The frequency of PMEL-positive cells in allograft tumours was similar to the frequency seen in allograft tumours from whole populations of spheres (Supplementary Fig. 3f). Allograft tumours from SC2 and SC4 express melanocyte genes (Supplementary Fig. 3g) and the proteins PMEL, MiTF and CATHEPSIN K (Supplementary Fig. 7d). These results demonstrate that single cells from our reverse-engineered sphere cell populations have properties of tumour-forming AML stem cells that have the ability to differentiate into several neural crest-derived and mesenchymal cellular lineages, as well as into epithelial cells. Interestingly, two of the six clones (SC1, SC5) did not form tumours in allograft experiments (zero tumours from six injections of each clone). These cells could be differentiated into Nile Red-positive and SMA-positive cells in appropriate media, but could not be differentiated into PMEL- or GFAP-expressing cells (Supplementary Fig. 7e), demonstrating that not all cells within a sphere have the properties of AML neoplastic stem cells, potentially implying the existence of a hierarchy of differentiation.
Given this mesenchymal differentiation phenotype we next analysed markers of mesenchymal stem cells in our engineered sphere cells. Flow cytometric comparisons of sphere-selected shRNA-Tsc2/Cdkn2a∆/∆ cells and control Cdkn2a∆/∆ kidney cells (Supplementary Fig. 8a) revealed that both genotypes of sphere cells expressed SCA-1 and CD29, and shRNA-Tsc2/Cdkn2a∆/∆ cells specifically expressed the general mesenchymal marker CD73, but none of the cells expressed other characteristic markers of mesenchymal stem cells (CD105, CD106). These findings argue against the idea that we have simply isolated a normal population of kidney-resident mesenchymal stem cells that represent the AML-forming sphere cells in our culture system. The absence of expression of Nanog, Sox2 and Oct4, which are abundantly expressed in ES cells (Supplementary Fig. 8b), also argues against an induced pluripotent stem cell phenotype of our engineered sphere cells.
Neoplastic AML stem cells derive from renal epithelial cells
To gain further insight into molecular features of the engineered AML-initiating cells we used RNA sequencing to compare gene expression between primary renal cell cultures 5 days after infection with control or shRNA-Tsc2 + Cdkn2a viruses and spheres derived from shRNA-Tsc2 + Cdkn2a-infected cells harvested 12 days after infection (Fig. 3a). Gene expression values are provided in Supplementary Data 1. Compared with control infected cells, total populations of shRNA-Tsc2 + Cdkn2a cells displayed 154 genes that were upregulated >8-fold. Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) revealed association with expression signatures related to cellular proliferation and mTOR signalling (Supplementary Data 2), consistent with the introduced knockdowns and elevated proliferation rate of these cultures. Comparison of shRNA-Tsc2 + Cdkn2a spheres to shRNA-Tsc2 + Cdkn2a total cell populations (similar results were obtained when comparing shRNA-Tsc2 + Cdkn2a spheres to control infected cells, data not shown) identified 584 genes that were >8-fold upregulated in spheres (Supplementary Data 1). Interestingly, 93 of these genes overlapped with a set of 324 genes that are expressed at 10-fold or higher levels in S1 or S3 segments of proximal tubules compared with distal tubules, loops of Henle and collecting ducts30 (Fig. 3b). In contrast, comparison with a cumulated list of 593 genes that are specifically upregulated either in distal tubules, loops of Henleor collecting ducts compared to proximal tubules30 revealed an overlap of only 7 genes (Fig. 3b). The upregulation of a subset of the identified proximal tubule-specific genes (Slc34a1, Slc13a3, Aqp1, Vil1, Cubn, Fmo1, Kap) in spheres compared with total shRNA-Tsc2/sh+Cdkn2a populations was confirmed by real time PCR analyses (Fig. 3c). This result surprisingly demonstrates that spheres exhibit a stronger renal proximal tubule epithelial gene expression signature than cultured primary renal epithelial cells. Further supporting the epithelial nature of the spheres, Hnf4a was upregulated ~10,000 fold in spheres (Fig. 3c). Hnf4a encodes a transcription factor that is necessary for development of renal proximal tubules, is highly expressed in proximal tubule epithelial cells and regulates the expression of numerous proximal tubule specific genes31,32. GSEA analyses also identified experimentally established HNF4A and HNF1A target genes (Supplementary Data 2) and genes with bioinformatically predicted HNF4A and HNF1A transcription factor binding sites (Supplementary Data 2) as being significantly enriched in the sphere gene set. Genes encoding 14 different transcription factors that have been implicated in the development of many different cellular lineages were also upregulated >8-fold in spheres (Supplementary Data 1) and 3 of these (Hnf4a, Tal1, Tfec) were confirmed by real time PCR analyses (Fig. 3c). These proximal tubule and transcription factor gene signatures were also present in the four clonal sphere lines and in AML allograft tumours (Fig. 3c), suggesting that the engineered tumours display at least some of the characteristic gene expression profile of the proximal tubule epithelial cell, arguing that proximal tubular epithelial cells are the origin of these engineered tumours. Further supporting this notion, some cells in spheres expressed NAPI2A or stained positively for pan-CD133 (not the glycosylation-specific ‘stem cell marker’ antibody) (Fig. 3d), which are expressed by normal renal proximal tubule epithelial cells. At the same time, shRNA-Tsc2 + Cdkn2a spheres also exhibited evidence of an AML or melanocyte-like phenotype as shown by immunoreactivity for the AML markers PMEL, CATHEPSIN K, MiTF and MART-1 (Fig. 3d), expression of MiTF and CATHEPSIN K by western blotting (Supplementary Fig. 9a) and upregulation of Tyrp1 gene expression in comparison to non-sphere populations or to Myc/Trp53∆/∆ sphere populations (Supplementary Fig. 9b). Spindle cells in allograft AML tumours (Fig. 3e) also expressed the proximal tubule marker protein NAPI2A and epithelial structures in these tumours were positive for the epithelial markers E-CADHERIN and PAN-CYTOKERATIN and stained positively for pan-CD133, RCC and CD10 (Fig. 3e), three markers of the renal proximal tubule epithelium. We conclude that AML-forming sphere cells can also differentiate into proximal tubule epithelial cells. Consistent with a renal epithelial phenotype, scattered cells in allograft tumours derived from total sphere populations or from sphere clonal cell lines expressed the transcription factor PAX8, which is normally expressed in epithelia of the renal and genital-urinary tract (Supplementary Fig. 9c).
To gain further evidence for an epithelial origin of our engineered tumours we next genetically marked renal epithelial cells in vivo, labelling all nephron segments by doxycycline feeding of mice harbouring transgenes encoding Pax8 promoter-regulated expression of rtTA, Tet-responsive Cre expression33 and ROSA26-lox-STOP-lox-regulated tdTomato expression34(Pax8-rtTA;TRE-LC1;R26R-LSL-tdTomato) (Fig. 4a). In total 85% of cells cultured from these kidneys were tdTomato-positive (Fig. 4b) and when transformed with shRNA-Tsc2 + Cdkn2a lentiviruses 90% of the resulting spheres were tdTomato-positive (Fig. 4c). These could be differentiated to form tdTomato-positive epithelial cells, adipocytes and glia (Fig. 4d) and expressed characteristic genes of differentiated lineages (Supplementary Fig. 6b). Negative staining controls are shown in Supplementary Fig. 10a–d. Allograft tumours derived from these cultures expressed tdTomato (Fig. 4e) and cells in tumour regions characterised by adipocyte, spindle cell and thick-walled blood vessel histology were labelled with tdTomato (Fig. 4f). Similarly to the other tumours generated in this study, these allograft tumours stained positively for PMEL, CATHEPSIN K, PDGFRβ, SMA and VIMENTIN (Supplementary Fig. 10e), expressed PMEL by western blotting (Supplementary Fig. 10f), and exhibited a similar frequency of PMEL expressing cells (Supplementary Fig. 10g).
Cells isolated by collagenase digestion of resected tumours could be cultured as tdTomato-expressing spheres and sphere-selected cells formed new tdTomato-positive allograft AML tumours (Fig. 4g), establishing that these cells have tumour-propagating capacity, an expected feature of a neoplastic tumour stem cell. In contrast, in vivo lineage tracing of neural crest-derived cells using Sox10-Cre;R26R-LSL-tdTomato mice labelled a set of non-tubular interstitial cells in the intact kidney (Fig. 4a) that were present as rare clusters of tdTomato-labelled cells in our kidney cultures (Fig. 4b). However, after infection with shRNA-Tsc2 + Cdkn2a lentiviruses none of these cells contributed to spheres (Fig. 4c) or tumours (Supplementary Fig. 10h), excluding that they are the cells of origin of our AML model. These studies collectively demonstrate that loss of function of Tsc2 and Cdkn2a in cultured proximal tubule epithelial cells converts them into an AML-forming neoplastic stem cell.
Guided by these results, we repeated a previously published experiment involving Pax8-Cre-driven inducible deletion of Tsc1 in adult renal epithelia using Pax8-rtTA;TRE-LC1;Tsc1fl/fl mice33. As reported, within 2 months of homozygous deletion of Tsc1 in 6–8 week old mice, kidneys developed a severe polycystic phenotype with intermixed regions of adenoma-like epithelial proliferation but did not develop renal AMLs (Fig. 5a). All cystic and adenoma-like regions stained strongly for phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 (Ser240/244), indicative of Tsc1 deletion (Fig. 5b). Interestingly, however, immunohistochemical analyses revealed the presence of scattered PMEL positive cells that were present as single cells or clusters of 2–3 cells (on average 35 sites per mouse kidney section) within regions of solid or cystic epithelial proliferation (Fig. 5b). PMEL staining was predominantly cytoplasmic (Fig. 5c). PMEL positive cells were never observed in kidneys from wild type mice or Tsc1 heterozygous mutant mice (Pax8-rtTA;TRE-LC1;Tsc1fl/+). Cysts and adenoma lesions also showed scattered cells expressing SMA, another marker of renal AMLs (Fig. 5b). CATHEPSIN K staining was upregulated in all cells in cysts and adenomas (Fig. 5b), and CATHEPSIN K protein expression was detected by western blotting in kidney lysates from homozygous, but not heterozygous Tsc1 mutant mice or wild type mice (Supplementary Fig. 3i), suggesting that this increase is directly related to Tsc1 deletion and consistent with the fact that almost all cells in human renal AMLs express CATHEPSIN K27. Given that the strong hyperproliferative phenotype of Tsc1 homozygous deletion prevented aging experiments, we generated a cohort of 12 Pax8-rtTA;TRE-LC1;Tsc1fl/+ heterozygous mutant mice and analysed them 1 year after inducing gene deletion in 6–8 week old mice. By histological sectioning of kidneys we identified 20 cysts (14 were lined by a single layer of epithelial cells, 6 cysts displayed atypical, multilayered morphology), 5 small tumours with epithelial morphology and 28 lesions comprising closely packed cells with low cytoplasmic volume, often occurring close to blood vessels (Supplementary Fig. 11). These lesions exhibit a similar morphology to lesions that were identified upon Tsc1 deletion under a ubiquitious promoter and that were proposed to represent potential precursors of renal AMLs22. Consistent with this idea, the lesions in our mice harboured many cells that were positive for phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 (Ser240/244) and some cells that were positive for CATHEPSIN K, SMA, and more rarely for PMEL (Fig. 5b). Thus, the epithelial-specific PAX8-Cre driver appears to recreate a similar phenotype to that previously described with the ubiquitous Cre driver. These observations provide in vivo evidence to show that loss of TSC function in renal epithelial cells can cause the formation of different lesions that contain cells that express several different molecular markers of renal AML, consistent with our ex vivo cell engineering studies.
Epithelial origin of human AMLs
We next sought to determine the relevance of these mouse-based findings to human renal AML. To overcome the senescence barrier associated with loss of TSC function in primary human cells, we employed RPTECs immortalised with SV40 large T Antigen and hTERT35 and infected these cells with four independent shRNA-TSC2 lentiviruses, efficiently reducing TSC2 protein abundance (Supplementary Fig. 12a) and inducing the formation of spheres in non-adherent culture conditions (Supplementary Fig. 12b). These spheres could be differentiated into epithelial cells, adipocytes and glia in culture (Supplementary Fig. 12c). Importantly, while immortalised RPTECs did not form sub-cutaneous tumours (n = 3 mice), two independent TSC2 hairpins (II and IV) caused the formation of xenograft tumours (n = 4 mice for each hairpin) that histologically resembled the characteristic spindle cell, vascular and adipocyte structures of human renal AMLs, and also displayed regions of epithelial structures (Supplementary Fig. 12d). These tumours expressed the AML marker proteins HMB45, SMA, VIMENTIN, PDGFRβ and epithelial structures were positive for E-CADHERIN (Supplementary Fig. 12d). In comparison to control cells, shTSC2 spheres exhibited increased mRNA expression of proximal tubule signature genes and transcription factor encoding genes that were upregulated in spheres engineered from mouse cells (Supplementary Fig. 12e). Thus, cultured human renal proximal tubule epithelial cells are also converted to AML-forming cells by loss of function of TSC2 in cooperation with abrogation of cellular senescence.
Immunofluorescence staining of seven sporadic human AML tumours revealed that all tumours contained cells that express proteins that are expressed in proximal tubular epithelial cells in the kidney, namely NAPI2A, pan-CD133 and AQP1, but did not contain cells expressing THP, a marker of epithelial cells of the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle (Fig. 6a). Analyses of mRNA isolated from matched pairs of samples of normal kidney and AML tumour (n = 7 cases) from paraffin-embedded tissue revealed that all AMLs expressed similar or higher levels of proximal tubule marker genes (FMO1, CUBN, VIL1) and several transcription factor-encoding genes identified from our mouse studies (TAL1, HNF4A, TFEC) as normal kidney (Fig. 6b). These findings corroborate our mouse tumour engineering findings and are consistent with the idea that human renal AMLs derive from renal epithelial cells.
We next obtained a set of isogenic renal AML cell lines to investigate whether these cells display similarities to our engineered models. TRI-102 cells are an immortalised (E6/E7 and hTERT) derivative36 of a TSC2 null primary cell culture that was derived from a human renal AML37. TRI-103 is a derivative of TRI-102 into which TSC2 expression has been re-introduced36. Similarly to our engineered cells, TRI-102 but not TRI-103 cells formed spheres when grown in epithelial medium on non-adherent plates (Fig. 7a). When grown as adherent cultures, both TRI-102 and TRI-103 expressed the mesenchymal marker VIMENTIN, as well as the epithelial marker E-CADHERIN (Fig. 7b). TRI-102 cells also expressed the proximal tubule marker proteins CD133 and NAPI2A and the expression of these proteins was absent or reduced in TRI-103 cells (Fig. 7b). TRI-102 cells when grown as adherent cells or as spheres expressed higher mRNA abundance than TRI-103 of the transcription factors and some of the proximal tubule genes that we identified in our engineered systems (Fig. 7c). Finally, TRI-102 but not TRI-103 cells could be differentiated into Nile Red, CATHEPSIN K and PMEL positive cells in appropriate media (Fig. 7d). These findings establish that a cell line derived from a human renal AML have similar renal proximal tubule epithelial features and differentiation capacities to our engineered cellular systems.
Therapeutic studies using engineered AML models
In a recent phase 3 clinical trial of the mTORC1 inhibitor everolimus for large renal AMLs (>3 cm diameter) in TSC patients, 42% of the patients displayed a reduction in tumour volume of >50% within one year of treatment20 and this therapy is now a recommended treatment for these patients. However, once everolimus therapy is discontinued, AML lesions typically resume growth38,39. The cellular consequences of everolimus therapy in TSC patient renal AML tumours have not been able to be studied. To attempt to address this issue we utilised our engineered AML models. Everolimus caused a greater inhibition of proliferation of shRNA-Tsc2/Cdkn2a∆/∆ sphere-derived cells compared to control Cdkn2a∆/∆ kidney cells when grown under adherent cell culture conditions (Fig. 8a). Everolimus also decreased the number and size of spheres in non-adherent culture conditions (Fig. 8b–d) without decreasing cellular viability (Fig. 8e). Rather, everolimus decreased the proportion of S-phase cells and caused accumulation of cells in the G1 and G2/M cell cycle phases (Fig. 8f). The addition of everolimus to cellular differentiation experiments did not alter the ability of shRNA-Tsc2/Cdkn2a∆/∆ sphere cells to differentiate into different cellular lineages (Fig. 8g). Everolimus treatment (10 mg/kg i.p.daily for 2 weeks) of mice harbouring shRNA-Tsc2/Cdkn2a∆/∆ allograft tumours blocked tumour growth and tumours regressed after cessation of treatment but re-grew after ~3 months (Fig. 8h). This behaviour mimics the clinical response to mTOR inhibitor therapy. Tumours harvested during everolimus treatment (Fig. 8i) exhibited no apparent differences in histological appearance compared with untreated tumours (Fig. 8j), nor in the abundance of PMEL immunoreactive cells (Fig. 8j, k) but contained fewer proliferating cells as assessed by BrdU labelling (Fig. 8l, m). While everolimus caused a 3-fold increase in the number of cleaved caspase-3 positive cells, a marker of apoptosis (Fig. 8n), it should be noted that the frequency of apoptotic cells was very low (<0.1% of cells) and is therefore unlikely to be the major contributor to the therapeutic effects of the drug. This observation is consistent with the cell culture data and demonstrates that mTORC1 inhibition predominantly induces cell cycle arrest of AML tumour cells, without any obvious effects on cellular differentiation, consistent with the observed absence of complete cures in renal AML patients.
Discussion
Biallelic loss-of-function mutations inTSC2 and more rarely in TSC1 appear to represent the key genetic driving events of renal AMLs19. We show that loss of function of TSC2 in genetic backgrounds that abrogate senescence and proliferation arrest is sufficient to convert mouse and human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells into neoplastic stem cells that give rise to allograft or xenograft tumours that reproduce many of the histological and molecular features of human renal AMLs, providing the first models of AML-like tumours. It should be noted that these tumours represent ‘models’ as the genetic backgrounds that we employed in this study to overcome cellular senescence induced by loss of TSC2 function are apparently not reflected in the genetics of human renal AMLs, for example, genetic mutations or deletions of TP53, CDKN2A or other senescence regulating tumour suppressor genes have not been observed in AML tumours. It remains possible that yet-to-be-identified mechanisms operating at the epigenetic, translational or protein levels may permit escape from senescence in human renal AML. In addition, our engineered, sub-cutaneously growing tumours do not fully reproduce all of the morphological features and growth patterns seen in human renal AMLs growing in the kidney. Nonetheless, our studies of our engineered model systems revealed some new features of human renal AMLs, supporting the relevance of our models. Our engineered cells exhibit a proximal tubule gene expression signature, express proximal tubule-specific proteins and display upregulation of several transcription factors that play diverse roles in development and cellular differentiation programmes. These gene expression signatures and protein expression pattern are also at least partly present in human renal AML tumours and in a cell line derived from a renal AML, arguing that this classic ‘mesenchymal’ tumour might have an epithelial origin.
While unexpected, these findings are potentially consistent with a series of recent studies showing that renal epithelial cells can exhibit a range of different differentiation capacities. As part of the process of repair of injured tubules in response to kidney damage in vivo, renal proximal tubular epithelial cells adopt a mesenchymal appearance and express several molecular markers of mesenchymal cells and of stem cells, including the glycosylated form of CD133, CD24 and high aldehyde dehydrogenase activity40–43. Isolation of these cells revealed that they grow as spheres and that they express a strong ‘stemness’ transcriptional profile43. While not yet proven for cells isolated from the proximal tubule, isolation of a similarpopulation of CD133/CD24-expressing parietal epithelial cells from the Bowman’s capsule of the glomerulus revealed that these cells could be differentiated in culture into several types of renal epithelial cells, adipocytes, osteoblasts, endothelial cells and neuronal cells, suggestive of a multi-potent progenitor cell phenotype44. Thus, at least some and potentially all renal epithelial cells appear to exhibit a degree of cellular plasticity and can adopt progenitor or stem cell properties under certain circumstances45. Our observations that renal epithelium-specific heterozygous and homozygous deletion of Tsc1 in the mouse kidney causes the emergence of lesions in which at least some cells express molecular markers of renal AML is consistent with the notion that epithelial cells in vivo might have the capacity to become transformed to generate renal AMLs. Our genetically engineered tumour models provide the first experimental tools to further explore this idea and to define the molecular pathways that govern renal AML tumour biology, for example to assess the potential functions of upregulated transcription factors in causing cellular transformation and stemness. Our studies on the mechanistic basis of everolimus therapy provide proof-of-principle that these experimental models might also facilitate the future identification and pre-clinical validation of new therapeutic approaches for renal AMLs.
An interesting unanswered question is why mutation of TSC1 or TSC2 in humans predominantly causes the development of renal AMLs, renal cysts and more rarely of renal carcinomas, whereas Tsc1 or Tsc2 mutation in rats or mice causes renal cysts, adenomas and carcinomas, but does not lead to the formation of renal AMLs21. It is possible that the strong phenotypic effect of Tsc1 or Tsc2 deletion in causing epithelial hyperproliferation in the mouse kidney means that AMLs do not have the necessary time to develop in mouse models. Alternatively, we speculate that our cell culture setting in some way reproduces specific microenvironmental conditions, or niches, that are abundant in human kidneys but rare in mouse kidneys in vivo, and that these specific conditions are necessary for the formation of AMLs. One possibility could be the apparent enhanced rate of loss and replacement of renal epithelial cells in human nephrons compared to mouse nephrons that is believed to underlie the apparent ‘spontaneous’ epithelial to mesenchymal transition and acquisition of features of stemness in normal human kidneys but not in rodent kidneys41. Finally, it is possible that AML development requires additional, yet-to-be-identified genetic or epigenetic alterations that cooperate with loss of TSC function to promote the transition of an epithelial cell to an AML stem cell.
Renal AML belongs to a broader class of tumours termed PEComas that are named after the common presence of perivascular epithelioid cells (PEC). PEComas also include AMLs that form in other organs, lymphangioleiomyomatosis of the lung, clear-cell sugar tumour of the lung, clear-cell myomelanocytic tumour of the falciform ligament and other rare clear-cell tumours found at other anatomical sites46. PEComas represent a biological enigma as they share several cellular and molecular features and frequently involve TSC mutation, but the cell type(s) of origin of all of these tumours remains unknown; there is no known normal anatomical counterpart of the perivascular epithelioid tumour cell. By presenting evidence that suggests that the cell of origin of renal AMLs could be an epithelial cell, our studies suggest a new paradigm in the understanding of the biology of this disease and also suggest that epithelial cells in other organs might potentially represent the cells of origin of other types of PEComas. In view of our results, the classification of renal AML as a PEComamight be a misnomer and the current pathological terminology might need be reconsidered.
Methods
Mouse strains
The following mouse strains were utilised in this study: SCID/beige mutant mice (C.B-17/CrHsd-PrkdcscidLystbg-1) and C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice were from Harlan Laboratories. Cdkn2afl/fl (FVB;129P2-Cdkn2atm2Brn/Cnrm)47 were from EMMA (EM:00407). Sox10-Cre mice have been previously described48. Tsc1fl/fl(Tsc1tm1Djk/J)24 mice were from Jackson Laboratory (005680). Ai14 td-Tomato reporter mice (B6.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm14(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J)34 were from Jackson Laboratory (007914). Pax8-rtTA;TRE-LC133 mice were obtained from Prof. Carsten Wagner, University of Zurich and were intercrossed with Tsc1fl/fl mice. Approximately 6–8 week old were exposed to doxyxycline (5 mg/ml) in drinking water supplemented with 5% sucrose for 5 days. Animals were subsequently kept on normal drinking water for 2 months. All mouse experiments were approved by the Veterinary Office of the Canton of Zurich under the licence 06/2013. No statistical method was used to predetermine sample size. The experiments were not randomised and the investigator was not blinded to the genotype of mice.
Allograft and xenograft experiments
For allograft and xenograft experiments, SCID/beige mice were anesthetised and injected subcutaneously with 5 × 106 cells suspended in 50% Matrigel (BD, no.354230). Tumour growth was monitored throughout the experiment and tumour size measured with calipers every 3 days. Everolimus treatment (10 mg/kg i.p.) of mice harbouring AML allograft tumours was performed daily for 2 weeks.
Cell culture
Primary MEFs were isolated from E13.5 embryos from WT (C57BL/6) or Cdkn2afl/fl strains, cultured in DMEM plus 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in cell-culture incubators supplemented with 5% CO2 and maintained at 5% O2. Murine primary kidney cells were isolated and cultured in complete K-1 culture medium (DMEM-F12 medium (D6421, Sigma) supplemented with 0.5% FBS, 25 mM Glutamine, 5 mg/ml insulin, 1.25 ng/ml prostagladin E1, 34 pg/ml 3,3,5 Triiodothyronine, 5 mg/ml human Apo-transferrin, 1.75 ng/ml sodium selenite, 20 ng/ml Hydrocortisone and 25 ng/ml murine epidermal growth factor) as described49. For non-adherent cultures to induce sphere formation, kidney cells (2 × 103) were plated in ultra-low attachment culture plates (Corning, 3471) and incubated in complete K-1 culture medium. The spheroids appeared after ~7–10 days in culture. Spheres were dissociated into single cells using Accutase (Gibco, A-11105–01) for replating or for other assays. Human Renal Proximal Tubular Epithelial Cells (RPTEC) TH1 cell line is derived from primary human renal proximal tubule epithelial cells immortalised by two lentiviral vectors carrying the human telomerase (hTERT) and the SV40 T antigen35. These cells, as well as B16F1 cells, were cultured in DMEM plus 10% FBS in cell culture incubators at 37 °C, 5% CO2 and 5% O2. The TRI-102 and TRI-103 cell lines were kindly provided by Elizabeth Henske (Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston) and cultured in K1 medium in cell culture incubators at 37 °C, 5% CO2 and 5% O2. RPTEC TH1, TRI-102 and TRI-103 cells tested negatively for mycoplasma and were validated based on resistance to selection markers (Neo or Zeo) as well as by western blotting for exogenously expressed proteins (SV40 Large T-antigen).
Adipocyte differentiation: Cells obtained from spheres were cultured in DMEM high Glucose, 10% FBS, supplemented with 0.5 mM IBMX, 0.25 μM Dexamethasone, 1 μg/mL Insulin and 2 μM Rosiglitarone. 48 h later medium was changed to DMEM high Glucose, 10% FBS, supplemented with 1 μg/mL Insulin for 48 h. After this treatment, cells were cultured in DMEM high Glucose, 10% FBS without supplements for 7 days.
Neuralcrest differentiation: Cells obtained from spheres were cultured in DMEM-F12 medium, 5% FBS, supplemented with 160 nM TPA (12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate), 50 ng/mL mSCF (Stem cell factor, mouse, recombinant), 100 nM ET-3 (Endothelin 3, human), 25 ng/mL bFGF (Fibroblast growth factor-basic, human), 100 ng/mL α-MSH (α-Melanocyte stimulating hormone) and 1 nM Dexamethasone for 10 days.
Osteoblast differentiation: Cells obtained from spheres were cultured in DMEM high Glucose, 10% FBS, supplemented with 0.2 mM ascorbic acid, 0.25 μM Dexamethasone and 10 mM β-Glycerol phosphate for 14 days.
Epithelial differentiation: Cells obtained from spheres were cultured in complete K-1 media for 10 days.
Viral infections
MEFs and primary kidney cells were infected with adenoviruses expressing GFP (Vector Biolabs, 1060) or Cre-GFP (Vector Biolabs, 1700), lentiviruses (LKO.1) expressing non-silencing hairpin (Addgene, 10879) or shRNA against Tsc1 (Sigma, TRCN0000238187) or shRNA against Tsc2 (Sigma, TRCN0000306244). For lentiviral-mediated knockdown of Cdkn2a and Tsc2, we generated a MuLEvector50 containing U6 promoter-driven expression of shRNA against Cdkn2a, 7SK promoter-driven expression of shRNA against Tsc2 and PGK promoter-driven expression of puromycin resistance. Human RPTECs were infected with lentiviruses expressing non-silencing hairpin (Addgene, 1864) or four different shRNAs against TSC2 (Sigma, TRCN0000295896, TRCN000010455, TRCN000010454 and TRCN000040182). All cells were incubated overnight in virus-containing medium in the presence of 4 μg/ml polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich, no. H9268). Drug selection was performed 48 h after transduction using 4 μg/ml of puromycin. Cells were isolated from dissected tumours by digestion for 1 h at 37 °C with 1 mg/ml collagenase type II (Gibco, Life Technologies), washed twice with PBS, and cultured in DMEM plus 10% FBS.
Cellular assays
Cellular senescence was evaluated using the Senescence kit (Calbiochem QIA 117). For proliferation assays, cells were seeded at 2 × 105 cells per 6 cm dish in triplicate dishes and counted after 3 days before reseeding at the same density for the next passage. All proliferation assays shown are representative of at least three independent experiments. Cell viability within the spheres treated with and without everolimus was measured with a Trypan Blue viability assay.
Drug Assays
Transformed primary kidney cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 103 cells per well on a 96 well plate. After attachment of the cells, everolimus was individually added at different concentrations and medium changed every two days to ensure addition of new drug. Cells were fixed after 7 days in 5% w/v trichloracetic acid and stained in 0.057% w/v Sulforhodamine B (SRB) solution and air-dried. SRB was solubilized by incubation in the 10 mM Tris base solution (pH 10.5) and OD was measured at 540 nm in a micro-plate reader.shRNA-Tsc2/Cdkn2a∆/∆ spheres were cultured in the presence or absence of everolimus (1.6 nM) for 48 h.
Western blotting, antibody stainings and other stainings
Western blotting, immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry were conducted using antibodies against the following proteins or epitopes: β-ACTIN (Sigma-Aldrich, A2228, WB 1:5000), TSC1 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4906 s, WB 1:1000), TSC2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 3990s, WB 1:1000), p16 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-1207, WB 1:200), p19 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-32748, WB 1:200), p53 (Novocastra, NCL-p53-CM5p, WB 1:500), HIF-1α (Novus Biologicals, NB100-105, WB 1:500), GLUT1 (Abcam, ab14683, WB 1:2500), ribosomal protein S6 (Cell Signaling Technology 2217 s, WB 1:1000), phospho Ser240/244 ribosomal protein S6 (Cell Signaling Technology, 2215 s, WB 1:1000. IHC 1:200), 4E-BP1 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9644 s, WB 1:1000), phosphoThr37/46 4E-BP1 (Cell Signaling Technology, 2855 s, WB 1:1000), CD31 (Abcam, ab28364, IF 1:100), SMA (Abcam, ab5694, IHC 1.200, IF 1:100), antibody cocktail HMB45 + DT101 + BC199 (Abcam, ab732, IF 1:100), PMEL/gp100(HMB45) (Abcam, ab137078, WB 1:1000, IHC 1:100, ICC 1:250),HMB45 (DAKO A/S, M0634, IHC 1:200), PDGFRβ (Abcam, ab32570, IHC 1:100), VIMENTIN (Cell Signaling Technology, 5741,WB 1:1000, IF 1:200, ICC 1:200), E-CADHERIN (BD Bioscience, 610181, WB 1:1000and Abcam, ab11512, IHC 1:50, ICC 1:100), pan-CYTOKERATIN (BMA Biomedicals AG,T1302,IHC 1:100), GFAP (Abcam, ab7260, ICC 1:5000), NAPI2A51 (IF 1:100, ICC 1:100), AQP1 (Abcam, ab15080, IF 1:200), THP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-20631, IF 1:200), CD133(Abnova, PAB12663, IF 1:100, ICC 1:100), CD10 (Novocastra Laboratories Ltd,NCL-L-CD10-270, IHC 1:200), RCC (Ventana-Cell Marque, 760-4273, IHC 1:200),RFP (Bioconcept, 600-401-379, IF 1:200, ICC 1:200), BrdU (Merck Milipore, MAB3510, IF 1:200), cleaved CASPASE-3 (Cell Signaling, 9661, IF 1:400), S100 (Abcam, ab183979, IHC 1:100), NG2 (Abcam, ab129051, IHC 1:100), MELAN-A (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-20032, IF 1:50, ICC 1:50), CATHEPSIN K (Abcam, ab19027, WB 1:1000, IHC 1:200, ICC 1:200), MiTF (Abcam, ab20663, WB 1:1000, ICC 1:200), PAX8 (Protein Tech, 10366-1-AP, IHC 1:800), MYC (Abcam, ab32072, WB 1:1000).Validations of the primary antibodies are provided on the manufacturer’s websites or in the referenced citations. Full scans of all western blots presented in this study are shown in Supplementary Fig. 13.
Characterisation of adipocytes was performed using Nile Red (Molecular Probes TM) or Oil-Red-O staining. Cells were fixed in 10% formalin at room temperature for 1 h and after washing them in 60% isopropanol and drying them, Oil-Red-O solution (0.5% Oil-Red-O solution) was added for 2 h. Cells were washed with distilled water and counterstained with hematoxylin.
RNA analyses
Total RNA was extracted from cells and tissues using NucleoSpin RNA Kit (Machery-Nagel) or RNeasy Mini Kit (Quiagen) and cDNA synthesis was done with random hexamer primers and Ready-To-Go You-Prime First-Strand Beads (GE Healthcare). Primers used for real time PCR analyses are listed in Supplementary Table 1. For deep sequencing, RNA samples were sequenced using an IluminaHiSeq 2000 sequencer at the Functional Genomics Center Zurich (FGCZ). GSEA analyses were conducted using the Molecular Signatures Database (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp).
Flow cytometry
Flow cytometry analysis of the mesenchymal stem cell markers was performed as described in mouse multipotent mesenchymal stromal cell marker antibody panel protocol (R&D systems, SC018). Everolimus treated and untreated sphere cells were incubated with BrdU (30 μM) for 12 h prior to harvesting and cell-cycle analysis by flow cytometrywas conducted as described52.
Analyses of human AMLs
Tissues samples for immunofluorescence and real-time quantitative PCR were obtained at the University Hospital of Zurich (Zurich, Switzerland). The study was approved by the local ethics commission (reference number KEK-ZH-Nr. 2014-0604) with informed patient consent. RNA was extracted from punches of paraffin-embedded renal AML tumours and normal kidney tissue from the same patient.
Electron microscopy
Tissue culture samples were fixed in 2.5% buffered glutaraldehyde overnight, postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h, dehydrated in graded alcohols, incubated in pure propylenoxide and then propylenoxide-Epon mix and then embedded in Epon. The sections were cut with diamond knives on an ultramicrotome (Ultracut E, Reichert Jung, 90 nm sections), stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined using a Hitachi TEM type H-7650 electron microscope.
Statistics
Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed Student’s test, with a P value <0.05 considered to be statistically significant.
Data availability
All data relevant to this publication are provided in the Figures and Supplementary Information.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Helena Fisher for her technical help, to Angela Broggini assistance with electron microscopy and to the Cellular Oxygen and Anaesthesiology groups from Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich for their support in the study. We would like to thank Elizabeth Henske (Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, USA) for providing cell lines used in this study. This work was supported by grants to IJF from European Research Council (260316), Swiss Cancer Foundation (KFS-3693-08-2015), Novartis Foundation for medical-biological research (15B095) and to A.F.G. from Swiss National Science Foundation (PMPDP3_164462).
Author contributions
I.J.F. and A.F.G. designed the study; A.F.G., M.A., S.B., T.H., S.H., O.S. conducted experiments; P.J.W., S.B. conducted pathological analyses; L.S., O.S. provided mouse models and scientific ideas and I.J.F., A.F.G. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-017-01514-3.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Martignoni G, et al. PEComas of the kidney and of the genitourinary tract. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 2015;32:140–159. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2015.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Karbowniczek M, Yu J, Henske EP. Renal angiomyolipomas from patients with sporadic lymphangiomyomatosis contain both neoplastic and non-neoplastic vascular structures. Am. J. Pathol. 2003;162:491–500. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63843-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Paradis V, et al. Clonal analysis of renal sporadic angiomyolipomas. Hum. Pathol. 1998;29:1063–1067. doi: 10.1016/S0046-8177(98)90414-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Borkowska J, Schwartz RA, Kotulska K, Jozwiak S. Tuberous sclerosis complex: tumors and tumorigenesis. Int. J. Dermatol. 2011;50:13–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04727.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fernandez-Flores A. Evidence on the neural crest origin of PEComas. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. 2011;52:7–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jain MK, et al. In vitro system for differentiating pluripotent neural crest cells into smooth muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:5993–5996. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.11.5993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wong CE, et al. Neural crest-derived cells with stem cell features can be traced back to multiple lineages in the adult skin. J. Cell. Biol. 2006;175:1005–1015. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200606062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Billon N, et al. The generation of adipocytes by the neural crest. Development. 2007;134:2283–2292. doi: 10.1242/dev.002642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stone CH, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma: further immunophenotypic characterization of an expanding morphologic spectrum. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2001;125:751–758. doi: 10.5858/2001-125-0751-RA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Siroky, B. J. et al. Evidence for pericyte origin of TSC-associated renal angiomyolipomas and implications for angiotensin receptor inhibition therapy. AJP:Renal Physiol. 10.1152/ajprenal.00569.2013 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Yue, M. et al. Evidence supporting a lymphatic endothelium origin for angiomyolipoma, a TSC2. AJPA 1–12, 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.03.009 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.LeRoy MA, Rao P. Angiomyolipoma with epithelial cysts. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2016;140:594–597. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0170-RS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Davis CJ, Barton JH, Sesterhenn IA. Cystic angiomyolipoma of the kidney: a clinicopathologic description of 11 cases. Mod. Pathol. 2006;19:669–674. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Filho JDEP, et al. Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma with epithelial cysts: demonstration of Melan A and HMB45 positivity in the cystic epithelial lining. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 2012;16:397–401. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2011.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Qin W, et al. Angiomyolipoma have common mutations in TSC2 but no other common genetic events. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Carbonara C, et al. Apparent preferential loss of heterozygosity at TSC2 over TSC1 chromosomal region in tuberous sclerosis hamartomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1996;15:18–25. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199601)15:1<18::AID-GCC3>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Henske EP, et al. Loss of heterozygosity in the tuberous sclerosis (TSC2) region of chromosome band 16p13 occurs in sporadic as well as TSC-associated renal angiomyolipomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1995;13:295–298. doi: 10.1002/gcc.2870130411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fittschen A, et al. Prevalence of sporadic renal angiomyolipoma: a retrospective analysis of 61,389 in- and out-patients. Abdom. Imaging. 2014;39:1009–1013. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0129-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Giannikou K, et al. Whole exome sequencing identifies TSC1/TSC2 biallelic loss as the primary and sufficient driver event for renal angiomyolipoma development. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1006242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bissler JJ, et al. Everolimus for angiomyolipoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex or sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis (EXIST-2): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;381:817–824. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61767-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kwiatkowski DJ. Animal models of lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) Lymphat. Res. Biol. 2010;8:51–57. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2009.0013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liang N, et al. Regulation of YAP by mTOR and autophagy reveals a therapeutic target of tuberous sclerosis complex. J. Exp. Med. 2014;211:2249–2263. doi: 10.1084/jem.20140341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brugarolas JB, Vazquez F, Reddy A, Sellers WR, Kaelin WGJ. TSC2 regulates VEGF through mTOR-dependent and -independent pathways. Cancer. Cell. 2003;4:147–158. doi: 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00187-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kwiatkowski DJ, et al. A mouse model of TSC1 reveals sex-dependent lethality from liver hemangiomas, and up-regulation of p70S6 kinase activity in Tsc1 null cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2002;11:525–534. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.5.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang H, et al. Loss of Tsc1/Tsc2 activates mTOR and disrupts PI3K-Akt signaling through downregulation of PDGFR. J. Clin. Invest. 2003;112:1223–1233. doi: 10.1172/JCI200317222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Siroky BJ, et al. Human TSC-associated renal angiomyolipoma cells are hypersensitive to ERstress. AJP: Renal Physiol. 2012;303:F831–F844. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00441.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Martignoni G, et al. Cathepsin K expression in the spectrum of perivascular epithelioid cell (PEC) lesions of the kidney. Mod. Pathol. 2011;25:100–111. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lim SD, et al. Expression of the neural stem cell markers NG2 and L1 in human angiomyolipoma: are angiomyolipomas neoplasms of stem cells? Mol. Med. 2007;13:160–165. doi: 10.2119/2006-00070.Lim. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.L’Hostis H, Deminiere C, Ferriere JM, Coindre JM. Renal angiomyolipoma: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and follow-up study of 46 cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1999;23:1011–1020. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199909000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cheval L, Pierrat F, Rajerison R, Piquemal D, Doucet A. Of mice and men: divergence of gene expression patterns in kidney. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e46876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kanazawa T, Konno A, Hashimoto Y, Kon Y. Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha is related to survival of the condensed mesenchyme in the developing mouse kidney. Dev. Dyn. 2010;239:1145–1154. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Martovetsky G, Tee JB, Nigam SK. Hepatocyte nuclear factors 4 and 1 regulate kidney developmental expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. Mol. Pharmacol. 2013;84:808–823. doi: 10.1124/mol.113.088229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Traykova-Brauch M, et al. An efficient and versatile system for acute and chronic modulation of renal tubular function in transgenic mice. Nat. Med. 2008;14:979–984. doi: 10.1038/nm.1865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Madisen L, et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2010;13:133–140. doi: 10.1038/nn.2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kowolik CM, Liang S, Yu Y, Yee J-K. Cre-mediated reversible immortalization of human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells. Oncogene. 2004;23:5950–5957. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hong F, et al. mTOR-raptor binds and activates SGK1 to regulate p27 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. 2008;30:701–711. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yu J, Astrinidis A, Howard S, Henske EP. Estradiol and tamoxifen stimulate LAM-associated angiomyolipoma cell growth and activate both genomic and nongenomic signaling pathways. Am. J. Physiol. Lung. Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2004;286:L694–L700. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00204.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Curatolo P, Moavero R. mTOR inhibitors in tuberous sclerosis complex. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2012;10:404–415. doi: 10.2174/157015912804499537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Budde K, Gaedeke J. Tuberous sclerosis complex–associated angiomyolipomas: focus on mTOR inhibition. YAJKD. 2012;59:276–283. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kusaba T, Lalli M, Kramann R, Kobayashi A, Humphreys BD. Differentiated kidney epithelial cells repair injured proximal tubule. Proc.Natl Acad. Sci. 2014;111:1527–1532. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310653110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Smeets, B. et al. Proximal tubular cells contain a phenotypically distinct, scattered cell population involved in tubular regeneration. J. Pathol. 229, 645–659 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 42.Berger K, et al. Origin of regenerating tubular cells after acute kidney injury. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2014;111:1533–1538. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316177111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lindgren D, et al. Isolation and characterization of progenitor-like cells from human renal proximal tubules. Am. J. Pathol. 2011;178:828–837. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.10.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sagrinati C, et al. Isolation and characterization of multipotent progenitor cells from the Bowman’s capsule of adult human kidneys. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006;17:2443–2456. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006010089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kramann R, Kusaba T, Humphreys BD. Who regenerates the kidney tubule? Nephrol. Dialysis Transp. 2015;30:903–910. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Martignoni G, Pea M, Reghellin D, Zamboni G, Bonetti F. PEComas: the past, the present and the future. Virchows. Arch. 2007;452:119–132. doi: 10.1007/s00428-007-0509-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Krimpenfort P, Quon KC, Mooi WJ, Loonstra A, Berns A. Loss of p16Ink4a confers susceptibility to metastatic melanoma in mice. Nature. 2001;413:83–86. doi: 10.1038/35092584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Matsuoka T, et al. Neural crest origins of the neck and shoulder. Nature. 2005;436:347–355. doi: 10.1038/nature03837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Albers J, et al. Combined mutation of Vhl and Trp53 causes renal cysts and tumours in mice. EMBOMolMed. 2013;5:949–964. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201202231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Albers J, et al. A versatile modular vector system for rapid combinatorial mammalian genetics. J. Clin. Invest. 2015;125:1603–1619. doi: 10.1172/JCI79743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Custer M, Lotscher M, Biber J, Murer H, Kaissling B. Expression of Na-P(i) cotransport in rat kidney: localization by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. Am. J. Physiol. 1994;266:F767–F774. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1994.266.5.F767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Frew IJ, et al. Normal p53 function in primary cells deficient for Siah genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002;22:8155–8164. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.23.8155-8164.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data relevant to this publication are provided in the Figures and Supplementary Information.