Skip to main content
PMC home page
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives logoLink to Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
. 2017 Jun 21;5(4):e00329. doi: 10.1002/prp2.329

Obeticholic acid, a selective farnesoid X receptor agonist, regulates bile acid homeostasis in sandwich‐cultured human hepatocytes

Yuanyuan Zhang 1, Jonathan P Jackson 2, Robert L St Claire III 2, Kimberly Freeman 2, Kenneth R Brouwer 2, Jeffrey E Edwards 1,✉
PMCID: PMC5684861  PMID: 28805978

Abstract

Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a master regulator of bile acid homeostasis through transcriptional regulation of genes involved in bile acid synthesis and cellular membrane transport. Impairment of bile acid efflux due to cholangiopathies results in chronic cholestasis leading to abnormal elevation of intrahepatic and systemic bile acid levels. Obeticholic acid (OCA) is a potent and selective FXR agonist that is 100‐fold more potent than the endogenous ligand chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA). The effects of OCA on genes involved in bile acid homeostasis were investigated using sandwich‐cultured human hepatocytes. Gene expression was determined by measuring mRNA levels. OCA dose‐dependently increased fibroblast growth factor‐19 (FGF‐19) and small heterodimer partner (SHP) which, in turn, suppress mRNA levels of cholesterol 7‐alpha‐hydroxylase (CYP7A1), the rate‐limiting enzyme for de novo synthesis of bile acids. Consistent with CYP7A1 suppression, total bile acid content was decreased by OCA (1 μmol/L) to 42.7 ± 20.5% relative to control. In addition to suppressing de novo bile acids synthesis, OCA significantly increased the mRNA levels of transporters involved in bile acid homeostasis. The bile salt excretory pump (BSEP), a canalicular efflux transporter, increased by 6.4 ± 0.8‐fold, and the basolateral efflux heterodimer transporters, organic solute transporter α (OST α) and OST β increased by 6.4 ± 0.2‐fold and 42.9 ± 7.9‐fold, respectively. The upregulation of BSEP and OST α and OST β, by OCA reduced the intracellular concentrations of d8‐TCA, a model bile acid, to 39.6 ± 8.9% relative to control. These data demonstrate that OCA does suppress bile acid synthesis and reduce hepatocellular bile acid levels, supporting the use of OCA to treat bile acid‐induced toxicity observed in cholestatic diseases.

Keywords: bile acid, Cholestatic disease, Farnesoid X receptor, FXR, homeostasis, obeticholic acid, OCA

Abbreviations

BAAT

bile Acid‐CoA:Amino Acid N‐Acyltransferase

BACS

bile acid acyl‐CoA synthetase

BCRP

breast cancer resistance protein

BEI

biliary excretion index

BSEP

bile salt excretory pump

CA

cholic acid

CCM

cell culture medium

CDCA

chenodeoxycholic acid

CYP7A1

cholesterol 7‐alpha‐hydroxylase

CYP7B1

Cytochrome P450 family 7 subfamily B member 1

CYP8B1

cytochrome P450 family 8 subfamily B member 1

d8‐TCA

deuterium‐labeled sodium taurocholate

FDA

food and drug Administration

FXR

farnesoid X receptor

ICC

intracellular concentrations

MRP2

multidrug resistance‐associated protein 2

MRP3 and MRP4

multidrug resistance‐associated protein 3 and 4

NR1H4

nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group H Member 4

NTCP

sodium‐taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide

OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OATP2B1

organic anion transporting polypeptides 1B1, 1B3, 2B1; OSTα, organic solute transporter α

OCA

obeticholic acid

OSTβ

organic solute transporter β

PBC

primary biliary cholangitis

PFIC2

progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 2

P‐gp

P‐glycoprotein

PSC

primary sclerosing cholangitis

QC

quality control

qRT‐PCR

quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction

SCHH

sandwich‐cultured human hepatocytes

SHP

small heterodimer partner

Introduction

Bile acids are synthesized from cholesterol metabolism exclusively in the liver (Russell and Setchell 1992). In addition to the conventional roles in digestion and absorption of lipid and lipid soluble nutrients in the small intestine, bile acids are also signaling molecules regulating hepatic lipid, glucose, and energy homeostasis (Watanabe et al. 2006; Thomas et al. 2009; Teodoro et al. 2011; Prawitt et al. 2014). Over a decade of research has proven Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) a key regulator in maintaining bile acid homeostasis (Forman et al. 1995; Parks et al. 1999; Wang et al. 1999). FXR is a ligand‐activated nuclear receptor, predominantly expressed in the liver, intestine, kidney, and adrenal gland (Forman et al. 1995; Parks et al. 1999; Wang et al. 1999). Bile acids are endogenous ligands for FXR (Forman et al. 1995; Parks et al. 1999; Wang et al. 1999). Rising bile acid concentrations activate FXR which in turn induces the transcription of small heterodimer partner (SHP/NR0B2) and fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF‐19) which suppress the transcription of the rate‐limiting anabolic bile acid enzyme, CYP7A1 (Goodwin et al. 2000; Song et al. 2009; Russell and Setchell 1992). Hepatic clearance of bile acids is controlled by FXR. Bile salt export pump (BSEP/ABCB11), the major bile acid efflux transporter on the canalicular membrane of hepatocytes, is critical for formation of bile acid‐dependent bile flow (Strautnieks et al. 1998b). Human BSEP transcription is directly induced by FXR (Ananthanarayanan et al. 2001). Insufficient expression or nonfunctional BSEP causes cholestasis. (Strautnieks et al. 1998a; Jansen et al. 1999; Alissa et al. 2008; Davit‐Spraul et al. 2009; Whitington et al. 1994). Transporters, MRP2, BCRP, and P‐gp, also efflux bile acids into bile cannaluculi (Dawson et al. 2009). Transport of bile acids from hepatocytes into systemic circulation is mediated by basolateral efflux transporters including MRP3 and MRP4 (Rius et al. 2003; Dawson et al. 2009) and OSTα and OSTβ (Landrier et al. 2006). FXR activation up‐regulates transcription of OSTα and OSTβ (Boyer et al. 2006; Frankenberg et al. 2006; Landrier et al. 2006).

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are chronic, cholestatic, and inflammatory autoimmune liver diseases (Beuers et al. 2015; Lindor et al. 2009; Sarkar and Bowlus 2016). Progressive destruction of bile ducts in PBC and PSC results in bile acid elevation in the liver and the circulation. PBC and PSC patients develop liver cirrhosis and failure eventually requiring liver transplantation; otherwise the diseases are fatal. Studies have demonstrated adaptive and compensatory mechanisms in PBC and PSC patient's livers in response to bile acids overload. Liver transporters including uptake and efflux transporters, and bile acid synthesis enzymes are adaptively changed to reduce accumulation of bile acids in hepatocytes. These compensatory mechanisms are largely regulated by the FXR (Takeyama and Sakisaka 2012).

FXR is a pharmacologically attractive target for the treatment of cholestasis in PBC, PSC, and other cholestatic diseases. Chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), is the most potent endogenous FXR activator (Makishima et al. 1999; Parks et al. 1999; Liu et al. 2014). Obeticholic acid (OCA), a semi‐synthetic analog of CDCA is approximately 100‐fold more potent than CDCA (Pellicciari et al. 2002). OCA was protective in a rat cholestasis model induced by estrogen (Fiorucci et al. 2005). In this model, OCA increased the bile flow and decreased the bile acid synthesis (Fiorucci et al. 2005).

Since OCA, a potent FXR agonist, is approved for the treatment of PBC, understanding its mechanistic action on genes involved in bile acid transport and synthesis is relevant. This was accomplished by utilizing sandwich‐cultured human hepatocytes (SCHH). This in vitro technique preserves the in vivo‐like bile acid biosynthesis and regulatory pathways (Jackson et al. 2016) including uptake and efflux transporters proper localization (Hoffmaster et al. 2004; Li et al. 2009). SCHH are also capable of determining hepatobiliary distribution of endogenous bile acids (Swift et al. 2010). FXR‐regulated gene expression, transporter function, and endogenous bile acid levels were evaluated after OCA treatment in comparison to CDCA.

Materials and Methods

CDCA, tamoxifen, and aflatoxin B were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). OCA and its conjugates (taurine and glycine) were provided by Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (San Diego, CA). Primary human hepatocyte cultures were seeded and maintained utilizing propriety cell culture media formulations developed at Qualyst Transporter Solutions (Durham, NC). Cell culture base medium and supplements were purchased from Gibco (Carlsbad, CA) and Corning (Tewksbury, MA). CellTiter‐Glo® Luminescent Cell Viability Assays were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). All quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR) reagents were purchased from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA). Pierce™ BCA™ Protein Assays were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA).

Sandwich‐cultured human hepatocyte culture and treatment

SCHH were prepared by Qualyst Transporter Solutions using cryopreserved human hepatocytes purchased from Triangle Research Laboratories (RTP, NC) and Xenotech (Lenexa, KS). Hepatocytes were QTS Transporter Certified™. QTS Certification signifies that SCHH reestablishes a functional bile canalicular network capable of supporting hepatic drug uptake and biliary efflux function. Transporter Certified™ cryopreserved hepatocytes in sandwich culture are the optimal system for evaluating hepatic transporter interaction potential of new chemical entities. The preparation and treatment of SCHH are described in the Appendix, Section 1.1.1.

Cytotoxicity assessment

Morphological assessment

SCHH were treated with CDCA, OCA, glyco‐OCA, and tauro‐OCA (0.1, 0.316, 1.0, 3.16, 10, 31.6, 100 μmol/L) or cytotoxicity‐positive controls (50 μmol/L tamoxifen, 10 μmol/L aflatoxin) for 72 h with daily medium change. Cell morphology was evaluated at 24, 48, and 72 h using phase contrast microscopy for each of the treatment groups on a daily basis. Images were captured using a Zeiss Axiovert 40CFL microscope equipped with phase contrast optics, AxioCam MRc camera, and AxioVision imaging software (V4.6.1).

Morphology of the hepatocyte cultures was compared to controls for any morphological alterations (e.g., changes in cell shape, cytoplasmic alterations, accumulation of vacuoles suggestive of dilated organelles and lipid droplets) indicative of cytotoxicity (Guillouzo et al. 1997; Tyson and Green 1987).

Biochemical evaluation of cell viability

Cell viability of hepatocytes was assessed by determining the amount of ATP present after 72 h of exposure to OCA, CDCA, glyco‐OCA tauro‐OCA, and the positive controls tamoxifen and aflatoxin B using CellTiter‐Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assays from Promega (Madison, WI) following manufacturer's procedures. Each test condition was performed in triplicate.

Total RNA isolation and qRT‐PCR

Following 72 h of treatment with CDCA (0.1, 0.316, 1.0, 3.16, 10, 31.6, 100 μmol/L), or OCA, glyco‐OCA, or tauro‐OCA (0.00316, 0.01, 0.0316, 0.1, 0.316, 1.0, 3.16 μmol/L), SCHH were washed and lysed for total RNA isolation using Qiagen RNeasy kit following manufacturer's instructions. Details are described in Appendix Section 1.2.1

Bile acid profiling and hepatobiliary disposition assessment

Following 72 h of treatment with CDCA (100 μmol/L) or OCA (1.0 μmol/L), the endogenous bile acid composition and hepatobiliary disposition of d8‐TCA in SCHH compartments (cell, bile pocket, and cell culture medium) were determined using B‐CLEAR® technology. See Appendix Section 1.3.1 for detailed descriptions of cell culture preparation, experimental procedure, and calculations for biliary accumulation, biliary excretion index (BEI), and intracellular concentration (ICC) of d8‐TCA. Protein content was determined using Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following manufacturer's instructions.

Bioanalytical of bile acid profiling and disposition assessment

Analytes (d8‐TCA, CA, tauro‐CA, glyco‐CA, CDCA, tauro‐CDCA, and glyco‐CDCA) were extracted from study samples (cell culture medium and hepatocyte lysates). Extraction procedure are detailed in Appendix Section 1.4.1. Prepared samples were filtered and analyzed by LC‐MS/MS using a Shimadzu binary HPLC system (Columbia, MD) and tandem mass spectrometry using Thermo Electron TSQ® Quantum Discovery MAX™ (Waltham, MA) with an Ion Max ESI source operating in negative ion electrospray ionization mode using multiple reaction monitoring.

Data analysis

The assays in this study were conducted in SCHH prepared from three individual donors except for the cytotoxicity assay that was conducted in SCHH of one liver donor. Every measurement was performed in triplicate per donor. Data were normalized to the vehicle controls (DMSO) and represent the mean ± SD from three donors. The cytotoxicity data represent means from triplicate wells from one donor. The data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism 6.0 (La Jolla, CA).

Results

No Cytotoxicity Induced by OCA

Compared to the vehicle control treatment, no morphological changes including loss of cuboidal cell shape, loss of cell‐to‐cell contact, and cell detachment were observed in SCHH after 72 h of exposure to OCA or CDCA (0.1, 0.316, 1.0, 3.16, 10, 31.6, 100 μmol/L) (Appendix Fig. 1.3.1). Consistently, ATP depletion studies demonstrated no meaningful reduction in ATP cellular content in hepatocytes exposed to 0.1‐100 μmol/L OCA or CDCA for 72 h (Fig. 1). These data suggested that OCA or CDCA were not cytotoxic up to 100 μmol/L.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Evaluation of cell viability. ATP levels were measured in sandwich‐cultured human hepatocytes following exposure to increasing concentrations (0.1, 0.316, 1.0, 3.16, 10, 31.6, 100 μmol/L) of CDCA (A), OCA (B), tauro‐OCA (C), glyco‐OCA (D), and positive controls (Tamoxifen 50 μmol/L and Aflatoxin 10 μmol/L) for 72 h. The data represent means from triplicate wells from 1 donor.

No marked morphological changes were observed after 72 h of treatment with 0.1‐31.6 μmol/L glyco‐OCA and tauro‐OCA (Appendix Fig. 1.3.1.) indicating that glyco‐OCA or tauro‐OCA at concentrations from 0.1 to 31.6 μmol/L were not cytotoxic to hepatocytes. Marked morphological changes were observed in SCHH exposed to 100 μmol/L glyco‐OCA or 100 μmol/L tauro‐OCA for 72 h (Appendix Fig. 1.3.1.). Cell morphology data were supported by ATP depletion studies that demonstrated ATP content in SCHH was reduced to 66.1% and 69.3% relative to control following exposure to 100 μmol/L glyco‐OCA and 100 μmol/L tauro‐OCA, respectively (Fig. 1). These changes indicated that glyco‐OCA and tauro‐OCA at 100 μmol/L were toxic to hepatocytes.

The positive control toxicants, tamoxifen (Appendix Fig. 1.3.1) and aflatoxin B (data not shown) caused marked changes in cell morphology (e.g., loss of cuboidal cell shape and loss of cell‐to‐cell contact). The severity of morphological changes increased over time after 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure. ATP cellular content was reduced to 1.3% and 2.1% relative to control after 72 h exposure to tamoxifen and aflatoxin, respectively (Fig. 1).

OCA activates FXR‐mediated bile acid homeostasis feedback mechanism

Using B‐CLEAR® technology, the effect of 1 μmol/L OCA exposure for 72 h was evaluated on total endogenous bile acid content, disposition, and bile acid synthesis in the hepatocyte, bile, and cell culture medium (CCM) from three donors in SCHH.

Total endogenous bile acid content comprised the sum of CA, glyco‐CA, tauro‐CA, CDCA, glyco‐CDCA, and tauro‐CDCA. OCA decreased the total bile acid content to 42.7 ± 20.5%, relative to control (Fig. 2). OCA correspondingly decreased total endogenous bile acid content in cell, bile, and CCM to 16.6 ± 7.2%, 5.4 ± 1.7%, and 54.6 ± 26.3%, respectively, relative to the control.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Determination of endogenous bile acid pool and disposition. Total endogenous bile acid mass was calculated including cholic acid (CA), tauro‐CA, glyco‐CA, chenodeoxycholate (CDCA), tauro‐CDCA, and glyco‐CDCA in hepatocytes (cell), bile pockets (bile), and cell culture media (CCM) following 72 h of 1 μmol/L OCA. Disposition of endogenous individual bile acid components were measured and calculated in cell, CCM, and bile. The assays were conducted in SCHH from three donors and in triplicate per donor. Data were normalized to controls and represent the mean ± SD from three donors.

The expression of genes involved in bile acid synthesis including SHP, FGF‐19, CYP7A1, Cytochrome P450 Family 7 Subfamily B Member 1 (CYP7B1), Cytochrome P450 Family 8 Subfamily B Member 1 (CYP8B1), Bile Acid‐CoA:Amino Acid N‐Acyltransferase (BAAT), and bile acid acyl‐CoA synthetase (BACS), was evaluated in SCHH from three donors following 72 h exposure to increasing concentrations of OCA (0.00316–3.16 μmol/L) or CDCA (0.1‐100 μmol/L).

Figure 3 illustrates the effect of OCA and CDCA on the mRNA levels of SHP, FGF‐19, and CYP7A1. SHP and FGF‐19 are modulators of CYP7A1 activity. CYP7A1 is the rate‐limiting enzyme of bile acid synthesis. As OCA and CDCA cell culture concentration were increased, the genes encoding SHP and FGF‐19 mRNA levels increased; as postulated, CYP7A1 mRNA deceased. Specifically, OCA at 1 μmol/L increased SHP mRNA to 3.7 ± 0.2‐fold and FGF‐19 mRNA to 735 ± 63‐fold above vehicle control. Similarly, CDCA at 100 μmol/L increased SHP and FGF‐19 mRNA levels to 4.5 ± 0.9‐fold and 1430 ± 712‐fold, respectively, above control. Correspondingly, increased concentration of OCA and CDCA reduced the expression of CYP7A1 by 99%.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Measurement of mRNA expression of genes involved in bile acid synthesis and metabolism in Human Primary Hepatocytes. Sandwich‐cultured human hepatocytes from three donors were treated for 72 h with CDCA (0.1, 0.316, 1.0, 3.16, 10, 31.6, 100 μmol/L) or OCA (0.00316, 0.01, 0.0316, 0.1, 0.316, 1.0, 3.16 μmol/L). SHP (A, B), FGF‐19 (C, D), CYP7A1 (E, F), were evaluated following 72 h of exposure to increasing concentrations of CDCA and OCA using gene‐specific TaqMan® assays. PCR reactions were normalized to control. The data represent means ± SD from three donors. Statistical data are presented in Appendix, Figure 1.3.2 and Appendix, Table 1.2.1

Dose proportionality determinations corroborate the effect of OCA and CDCA on SHP, FGF‐19, and CYP7A1 (Appendix Fig. 1.3.2; Appendix Table 1.2.1). Slopes were considered dose linear if the 0.95 CI did not cross through zero and contained the slope value. Meeting these requirements, a slope of 1 is dose proportional; a slope less than 1 is linear but less than dose proportional; and a slope greater than 1 is linear but more than dose proportional. With increasing doses of OCA, significant positive slopes (0.95 CI) of 0.2641 (0.2235–0.2993) and 1.333 (1.191–1.474), were determined for SHP and FGF‐19, respectively. Similar trends were observed for CDCA in which SHP and FGF‐19 slopes were 0.4003 (0.3295–0.4711) and 2.039 (1.683–2.395), respectively. In contrast, increased doses of OCA and CDCA decreased the production of CYP7A1 mRNA in a dose proportional manner; −1.129 (−1.348 to −0.9095) and −2.48 (−3.499 to −1.462), respectively. In addition, correlation plots were constructed between SHP and CYP7A1 mRNA levels as OCA or CDCA dose increased. It is understood that as SHP expression rises, there is a concomitant suppression of CYP7A1. Correlation statistics confirmed this assumption; significant correlations (R 2) between SHP and CYP7A1 were 0.8491 and 0.7708 for OCA and CDCA treatment, respectively (Appendix Fig. 1.3.3; Appendix Table 1.2.2.).

No marked changes were observed in CYP7B1, CYP8B1, BAAT, and BACS mRNA (Appendix Fig. 1.3.4.).

Hepatobiliary disposition of d8‐TCA

Using B‐CLEAR® technology, the hepatobiliary disposition of d8‐TCA, a model bile acid, was determined in the hepatocyte and bile following 72 h exposure to 1 μmol/L OCA or 100 μmol/L CDCA. Compared with control, the BEI of d8‐TCA in SCHH was unchanged after 72 hour exposure to OCA or CDCA (109.8 ± 18.0% and 96.6 ± 4.1% relative to control, respectively, Fig. 4A). However, exposure to OCA or CDCA decreased d8‐TCA hepatic intracellular concentrations ICC to 39.6 ± 8.9% and 26.4 ± 7.5%, respectively, relative to control (Fig. 4B; Appendix Section 1.3.1. for calculations). Total disposition of d8‐TCA was reduced to 43.8 ± 2.8% and 24.7 ± 5.7%, relative to control following OCA or CDCA exposure, respectively (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Assessment of the hepatobiliary disposition of bile acids utilizing B‐CLEAR ® technology. Sandwich‐cultured human hepatocytes from three donors were treated with CDCA (100 μmol/L) and OCA (1 μmol/L) for 72 h. A probe bile acid, d8‐TCA (2.5 μmol/L), was incubated in sandwich‐cultured human hepatocytes for 30 min in Ca++ Plus (+) buffer and Ca++ Minus (‐) buffer. Total accumulation of d8‐TCA levels (hepatocyte + bile) was measured in Ca++ Plus (+) buffer and intracellular levels in Ca++ Minus (−) buffer. The calculated BEI (A), intracellular concentration (ICC, (B)) and total accumulation (C) were normalized to controls and represent the mean ±  SD from three donors.

OCA increases bile acid efflux transporter gene expression

The gene expression of uptake transporters on the hepatocyte basolateral membrane (sodium‐taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide [NTCP]; organic anion transporting polypeptides 1B1, 1B3, 2B1 [OATP1B1, OATP1B3, and OATP2B1]); hepatocyte basolateral efflux transporters (multidrug resistance‐associated protein 3 and 4 [MRP3 and MRP4], OSTα, OSTβ; canalicular efflux transporters (multidrug resistance‐associated protein 2 [MRP2], breast cancer resistance protein [BCRP], P‐glycoprotein [P‐gp], and BSEP), were determined following 72 h of exposure to increasing concentrations of OCA or CDCA).

Exposure to OCA at 1 μmol/L increased expression of basolateral efflux heterodimers OSTα mRNA and OSTβ mRNA by 6.4 ± 0.2‐fold and 42.9 ± 7.9‐fold, respectively, relative to control (Fig. 5A and C). Similarly, increases in OSTα and OSTβ expression were observed following CDCA exposure at the highest dose (100 μmol/L) [9.1 ± 1.3‐fold and 93.6 ± 23.8‐fold relative to control, respectively (Fig. 5B and D)]. Expression of the canalicular efflux transporter, BSEP, was 6.4 ± 0.8‐fold greater than the vehicle control following exposure to 1 μmol/L OCA (Fig. 5E). Likewise, exposure to 100 μmol/L CDCA increased the expression of BSEP mRNA to 8.9 ± 0.6‐fold above control (Fig. 5F). These data were corroborated using slope determinations for OCA and CDCA with respect to OSTα, OSTβ, and BSEP mRNA expression (Appendix Fig. 1.3.5 and Appendix Table 1.2.3.). In each treatment, as analyte concentration increased, there was a corresponding incremental increase in mRNA levels. Dose–response slopes were linear but less than dose proportional with the exception of the dose proportional slope for CDCA‐OSTβ curve.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Measurement of mRNA Expression of Bile Acid Efflux Transporters (OST α, OST β, and BSEP). After Treatment with OCA or CDCA in Human Primary Hepatocytes. Sandwich‐cultured human hepatocytes from three donors were treated for 72 h with CDCA (0.1, 0.316 1.0, 3.16, 10, 31.6, 100 μmol/L) or OCA (0.00316, 0.01, 0.0316, 0.1, 0.316, 1.0, 3.16 μmol/L). OST α (A, B), and OST β (C, D), and bile acid transporter, BSEP (E, F), were evaluated using gene‐specific TaqMan® assays. PCR reactions were performed in triplicate wells for each donor and normalized to control. The data represent mean ± SD from three donors.

No marked changes were observed in the expression of basolateral bile acid uptake transporters NTCP, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, and OATP2B1 in SCHH following 72 h exposure to OCA or CDCA. These results suggest that uptake may not contribute to the decrease observed in total bile acid accumulation or bile acid ICC (e.g. d8‐TCA). Similarly, the expression of other efflux transporters, P‐gp, MRP2, MRP3, MRP4, and BCRP, were unchanged in SCHH following treatment with either OCA or CDCA (Appendix Fig. 1.3.6.).

Using binding assays, glyco‐OCA and tauro‐OCA have been shown to be equipotent agonist compared to parent at FXR. (data not shown). Confirmation of similar agonist effect of glyco‐OCA and tauro‐OCA at FXR was demonstrated using a pharmacological platform measuring mRNA levels for CYP7A1, SHP, FGF‐19, BSEP, OSTα, OSTβ, other CYP enzymes, and transporters (Appendix Fig. 1.3.7.). For each parameter examined, the conjugated metabolites produced the same level of mRNA expression as OCA.

Discussion

FXR acts as a master regulator of bile acid homeostasis (Makishima et al. 1999; Chiang 2009) as illustrated in Figure 6. Identification of FXR as a therapeutic target for the treatment of chronic liver diseases (e.g., PBC) has led to the development of more potent FXR agonists including OCA (Ali et al. 2015). OCA has higher selectivity and is approximately 100‐fold more potent on FXR than CDCA, the endogenous ligand. Similar to endogenous bile acids, OCA is metabolized to glycine and taurine conjugates, glyco‐OCA and tauro‐OCA, respectively. It has also been determined that the OCA conjugates have nearly identical activity on FXR as does OCA. To better understand the mechanism‐of‐action of OCA in humans, a validated in vitro human hepatocyte sandwich‐cultured (SCHH) model was employed to investigate gene regulation of bile acid synthesis and bile acid elimination. In addition, the OCA hepatic effects were compared to the natural occurring bile salt ligand CDCA.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Mechanisms of bile acid homeostasis. Activation of FXR by CDCA or OCA results in increased expression of small heterodimer partner (SHP) and fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF‐19), genes that suppress Cholesterol 7α‐hydroxylase (CYP7A1), the rate‐limiting enzyme in the de novo bile acid synthesis pathway. FXR also directly regulates bile acids via induction of the bile acid salt export pump (BSEP), which effluxes bile acids from hepatocytes to bile and heterodimer organic solute transporters, OST α and OST β, which transport bile acids form hepatocytes to blood circulation.

Foremost, OCA and CDCA bile acids at concentrations up to 100 μmol/L for 72 h did not damage sandwich‐cultured hepatocytes as evidenced by lack of cellular morphological alterations or cellular reduction in ATP (Appendix Figure 1.3.1.). Compared to conventional cultured primary hepatocytes, where OCA concentrations <3 μmol/L produced cytotoxicity (data not shown). The OCA conjugates were not cytotoxic up to 31.6 μmol/L; they did, however, show clear morphological changes and ATP cellular loss at 100 μmol/L. Positive control toxicants damaged hepatocytes in a time‐dependent manner adding to the confidence that OCA and metabolites were not toxic at expected therapeutic concentrations. The absence of OCA cellular toxicity may likely be due to polarization of SCH hepatocytes resulting in the appropriate localization and function of bile acid transporters (Li et al. 2009; Swift et al. 2010), thus allowing natural bile acids and bile acid analogues to efflux into bile pockets and reduce intracellular accumulation and cytotoxicities (Jackson et al. 2016).

OCA at 1 μmol/L for 72 h decreased total endogenous bile acid content (CA, glyco‐CA, tauro‐CA, CDCA, glyco‐CDCA, and tauro‐CDCA) by approximately 57%. Sampling separate compartments of the model, reductions in total bile acid were observed in hepatocytes, bile, and CCM (Fig. 2). In a separate experiment, total disposition of d8‐TCA (a prototypical bile acid) was reduced to 43.8 ± 2.8% and 24.7 ± 5.7%, relative to control following OCA or CDCA exposure, respectively (Fig. 4C). These data support the hypothesis that OCA and CDCA downregulate bile acid production in human hepatocytes. As discussed below, further work using gene biomarkers confirmed this theory.

There are numerous, complex biological cascades triggered by OCA and CDCA that regulate bile acid homeostasis. These include but are not limited to bile acid synthesis and bile acid uptake and efflux transporters. Expression of relevant genes involved in bile acid synthesis stimulated by OCA and CDCA include SHP, FGF‐19, and CYP7A1. OCA and CDCA function as FXR agonists resulting in the inhibition of bile acid synthesis. Stimulation of FXR leads to increased levels of SHP and FGF‐19. These in turn suppress the production of CYP7A1, the rate‐limiting enzyme of bile acid synthesis thereby reducing bile acid levels. Addition of either agonist to the SCHH plates increased SHP and FGF‐19 mRNA. OCA at 1 μmol/L, increased mRNA levels approximately 4‐ and 735‐fold, SHP and FGF‐19, respectively, above vehicle control (Fig. 3). CDCA concentrations of 100 μmol/L achieved similar effects as OCA. Concentration of OCA and CDCA at 1 and 100 μmol/L, respectively, reduced expression of CYP7A1 by 99%. Dose–response analysis determined that SHP, FGF‐19, and CYP7A1 mRNA levels increased in a linear fashion with changing dose (Appendix Fig. 1.3.2). In addition, correlation plots of SHP versus CYP7A1 mRNA (Appendix Fig. 1.3.3) as OCA or CDCA dose increased, showed good correlations (R 2) in which an increase in SHP led to a decrease in CYP7A1 mRNA levels after exposure to OCA (0.849) or CDCA (0.771). These data confirm that FXR activation by OCA or CDCA results in predictable pharmacological regulation of bile acid homeostasis.

The comparison of OCA with CDCA confirmed that OCA potency on FXR is approximately 100‐fold greater than CDCA as shown by the dose‐dependent increase in the expression of respective FXR target genes, SHP and FGF‐19, and subsequent inhibition of CYP7A1 (Lee et al. 2000; Holt et al. 2003; del Castillo‐Olivares et al. 2004). De novo bile acid synthesis was substantially suppressed in OCA‐treated hepatocytes; this result is in line with reduced circulating C4 levels, a marker of bile acid synthesis in clinical studies (Hirschfield et al. 2015). OCA and CDCA had minor effects on other gene targets that include CYP7B1, CYP8B1, BAAT, and BACS.

Bile acid levels in hepatocytes and bile canaliculae are also controlled by membrane transporters. OCA (1 μmol/L) and CDCA (100 μmol/L) increased the expression of hepatocyte basolateral efflux transporters, OSTα mRNA (~6‐ and 9‐fold) and OSTβ mRNA (~43‐ and 93‐fold); respectively. At the same agonist concentrations, expression of the canalicular efflux transporter on the apical hepatocyte membrane, BSEP, was 6‐and 9‐fold higher, OCA and CDCA, respectively, than vehicle control. In combination, OCA modulates the efflux of bile acid from the hepatocyte via the basolateral membrane transports, OSTα and OSTβ, and the apical membrane transporter BSEP. OSTβ upregulation was more sensitive to OCA drug stimulus; approximately 8‐fold higher compared to OSTα or BSEP.

Although there was an increase in the apical efflux transporter BSEP, no apparent change in the BEI was observed. These data suggest that the increase in the basolateral efflux is much greater than the increase in the apical efflux, consistent with results for CDCA treated SCHH (Jackson et al. 2016). A follow‐up study of mechanistic modeling and simulation will be to evaluate the extent of BSEP‐mediated apical efflux, and OSTα/OSTβ‐mediated basolateral efflux after OCA treated SCHH.

In conclusion, OCA and its glycine and taurine conjugates are selective and potent FXR agonists that reduce the total bile acid pool and intracellular concentration of potentially cytotoxic bile acids in hepatocytes. Thus, FXR activation is an important compensatory mechanism to prevent cholestatic hepatotoxicity. These results support the use of OCA to treat bile acid‐induced toxicity observed in cholestatic diseases including PBC.

Disclosures

Yuanyuan Zhang and Jeffrey E. Edwards are employees and stock shareholders of Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc; Jonathan P. Jackson, Robert L. St. Claire III, Kimberly Freeman and Kenneth R. Brouwer have no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

Appendix S1. Materials and Methods, tables and figures.

Click here for additional data file. (2.6MB, docx)

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Zhang Y. , Jackson J. P. , Claire R. L. St. III , Freeman K. , Brouwer K. R. , Edwards J. E.. Obeticholic acid, a selective farnesoid X receptor agonist, regulates bile acid homeostasis in sandwich‐cultured human hepatocytes, Pharma Res Per, 5(4), 2017, e00329, https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.329

These data were originally presented as an oral presentation at 2016 20th North American International Society for the Study of Xenobiotics (ISSX) Meeting, Drug Metabolism Reviews 48:sup1, 6‐20.

References

  1. Ali AH, Carey EJ, Lindor KD (2015). Recent advances in the development of farnesoid X receptor agonists. Ann Transl Med 3: 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alissa FT, Jaffe R, Shneider BL (2008). Update on progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 46: 241–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ananthanarayanan M, Balasubramanian N, Makishima M, Mangelsdorf DJ, Suchy FJ (2001). Human bile salt export pump promoter is transactivated by the farnesoid X receptor/bile acid receptor. J Biol Chemist 276: 28857–28865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beuers U, Gershwin ME, Gish RG, et al. (2015). Changing nomenclature for PBC: from ‘cirrhosis’ to ‘cholangitis’. Gastroenterology 149: 1627–1629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyer JL, Trauner M, Mennone A, et al. (2006). Upregulation of a basolateral FXR‐dependent bile acid efflux transporter OSTalpha‐OSTbeta in cholestasis in humans and rodents. Am J Phys Gastrointest Liver Physiol 290: G1124–G1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. del Castillo‐Olivares A, Campos JA, Pandak WM, et al. (2004). The role of alpha1‐fetoprotein transcription factor/LRH‐1 in bile acid biosynthesis: a known nuclear receptor activator that can act as a suppressor of bile acid biosynthesis. J Biol Chemist 279: 16813–16821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chandra P, Brouwer KL (2004). The complexities of hepatic drug transport: current knowledge and emerging concepts. Pharm Res 21: 719–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chiang JY (2009). Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha regulation of bile acid and drug metabolism. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 5: 137–147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davit‐Spraul A, Gonzales E, Baussan C, et al. (2009). Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Orphanet J Rare Dis 4: 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dawson PA, Lan T, Rao A (2009). Bile acid transporters. J Lipid Res 50: 2340–2357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fiorucci S, Clerici C, Antonelli E, et al. (2005). Protective effects of 6‐ethyl chenodeoxycholic acid, a farnesoid X receptor ligand, in estrogen‐induced cholestasis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 313: 604–612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Forman BM, Goode E, Chen J, et al. (1995). Identification of a nuclear receptor that is activated by farnesol metabolites. Cell 81: 687–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Frankenberg T, Rao A, Chen F, et al. (2006). Regulation of the mouse organic solute transporter alpha‐beta, Ostalpha‐Ostbeta, by bile acids. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 290: G912–G922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ghibellini G, Vasist LS, Leslie EM, et al. (2007). In vitro‐in vivo correlation of hepatobiliary drug clearance in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther 81: 406–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin B, Jones SA, Price RR, et al. (2000). A regulatory cascade of the nuclear receptors FXR, SHP‐1, and LRH‐1 represses bile acid biosynthesis. Mol Cell 6: 517–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guillouzo A, Morel F, Langouet S, et al. (1997). Use of hepatocyte cultures for the study of hepatotoxic compounds. J Hepatol 26(Suppl 2): 73–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hirschfield GM, Mason A, Luketic V, et al. (2015). Efficacy of obeticholic acid in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Gastroenterology 148(751–61): e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoffmaster KA, Turncliff RZ, LeCluyse EL, et al. (2004). P‐glycoprotein expression, localization, and function in sandwich‐cultured primary rat and human hepatocytes: relevance to the hepatobiliary disposition of a model opioid peptide. Pharmaceutical Res. 21: 1294–1302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Holt JA, Luo G, Billin AN, et al. (2003). Definition of a novel growth factor‐dependent signal cascade for the suppression of bile acid biosynthesis. Genes Dev 17: 1581–1591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jackson JP, Freeman KM, Friley WW, St. Claire RL III, Black C, Brouwer KR (2016). Basolateral efflux transporters: a potentially important pathway for the prevention of cholestatic hepatotoxicity. Applied In Vitro Toxicology 2: 207–216. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jansen PL, Strautnieks SS, Jacquemin E, et al. (1999). Hepatocanalicular bile salt export pump deficiency in patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Gastroenterology 117: 1370–1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Landrier JF, Eloranta JJ, Vavricka SR, et al. (2006). The nuclear receptor for bile acids, FXR, transactivates human organic solute transporter‐alpha and ‐beta genes. Am J Phys Gastrointest Liver Physiol 290: G476–G485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee YK, Dell H, Dowhan DH, et al. (2000). The orphan nuclear receptor SHP inhibits hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 and retinoid X receptor transactivation: two mechanisms for repression. Mol Cell Biol 20: 187–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li N, Bi YA, Duignan DB, et al. (2009). Quantitative expression profile of hepatobiliary transporters in sandwich cultured rat and human hepatocytes. Mol Pharm 6: 1180–1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lindor KD, Gershwin ME, Poupon R, et al. (2009). Primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 50: 291–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu X, Chism JP, LeCluyse EL, et al. (1999). Correlation of biliary excretion in sandwich‐cultured rat hepatocytes and in vivo in rats. Drug Metab Dispos 27: 637–644. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu J, Lu H, Lu YF, et al. (2014). Potency of individual bile acids to regulate bile acid synthesis and transport genes in primary human hepatocyte cultures. Toxicol Sci 141: 538–546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Makishima M, Okamoto AY, Repa JJ, et al. (1999). Identification of a nuclear receptor for bile acids. Science 284: 1362–1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Parks DJ, Blanchard SG, Bledsoe RK, et al. (1999). Bile acids: natural ligands for an orphan nuclear receptor. Science 284: 1365–1368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pellicciari R, Fiorucci S, Camaioni E, et al. (2002). 6alpha‐ethyl‐chenodeoxycholic acid (6‐ECDCA), a potent and selective FXR agonist endowed with anticholestatic activity. J Med Chem 15(45): 3569–3572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Prawitt J, Caron S, Staels B (2014). Glucose‐lowering effects of intestinal bile acid sequestration through enhancement of splanchnic glucose utilization. Trends Endocrinol Metab 25: 235–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rius M, Nies AT, Hummel‐Eisenbeiss J, et al. (2003). Cotransport of reduced glutathione with bile salts by MRP4 (ABCC4) localized to the basolateral hepatocyte membrane. Hepatology 38: 374–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Russell DW, Setchell KD (1992). Bile acid biosynthesis. Biochemistry 31: 4737–4749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sarkar S, Bowlus CL (2016). Primary sclerosing cholangitis: multiple phenotypes. Multiple Approaches. Clin Liver Dis 20: 67–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Song KH, Li T, Owsley E, et al. (2009). Bile acids activate fibroblast growth factor 19 signaling in human hepatocytes to inhibit cholesterol 7alpha‐hydroxylase gene expression. Hepatology 49: 297–305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Strautnieks SS, Bull LN, Knisely AS, et al. (1998a). A gene encoding a liver‐specific ABC transporter is mutated in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Nat Genet 20: 233–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Strautnieks SS, Bull LN, Knisely AS, et al. (1998b). A gene encoding a liver‐specific ABC transporter is mutated in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Nat Genet 20: 233–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Swift B, Pfeifer ND, Brouwer KL (2010). Sandwich‐cultured he patocytes: an in vitro model to evaluate hepatobiliary transporter‐based drug interactions and hepatotoxicity. Drug Metab Rev 42(3): 446–471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Takeyama Y, Sakisaka S (2012). Hepatobiliary membrane transporters in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatol Res 42: 120–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Teodoro JS, Rolo AP, Palmeira CM (2011). Hepatic FXR: key regulator of whole‐body energy metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab 22: 458–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Thomas C, Gioiello A, Noriega L, et al. (2009). TGR5‐mediated bile acid sensing controls glucose homeostasis. Cell Metab 10: 167–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tyson CA, Green CE (1987). 6‐cytotoxicity measures: choices and methods pp. 119–158. In Rauchman E.J., ed The Isolated hepatocyte: Use in Toxicology and Xenobiotic Biotransformations. Elsevier; [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang H, Chen J, Hollister K, et al. (1999). Endogenous bile acids are ligands for the nuclear receptor FXR/BAR. Mol Cell 3: 543–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Watanabe M, Houten SM, Mataki C, et al. (2006). Bile acids induce energy expenditure by promoting intracellular thyroid hormone activation. Nature 439: 484–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Whitington PF, Freese DK, Alonso EM, et al. (1994). Clinical and biochemical findings in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 18: 134–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix S1. Materials and Methods, tables and figures.

Click here for additional data file. (2.6MB, docx)

Articles from Pharmacology Research & Perspectives are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES