Abstract
Background
Opisthorchis viverrini infection is a major public health problem in northern and northeastern Thailand. The chronic infection of O. viverrini is related to cholangiocarcinoma which causes high mortality in endemic areas. Therefore, the diagnosis, treatment, control and prevention of O. viverrini infection are necessary. The morphology of the egg is very similar to that of other species of human liver flukes (Opisthorchis felineus and Clonorchis sinensis) as well as that of small intestinal flukes in the family Heterophyidae. Thus, molecular characterization is crucially required to discriminate species of Opisthorchis-like eggs in fecal examination.
Methodology/Principal findings
We aimed to determine the prevalence of O. viverrini infection among villagers living in Sanamchaikate District, Chachoengsao Province, in central Thailand, where O. viverrini infection has previously been reported. A total of 2,609 fecal samples were examined for Opisthorchis-like eggs using microscopic examination. PCR-RFLP analysis of the ITS2 region was used to discriminate Opisthorchis-like eggs. The genetic structure of O. viverrini infection was demonstrated using nucleotide sequencing of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (nad1). Testing of evolutionary neutrality of the cox1 and nad1 sequences of O. viverrini was performed using Tajima's D tests and Fu's Fs tests. Moreover, the haplotype networks and phylogenetic trees were constructed to study the relationships of O. viverrini isolated from different endemic areas. A high prevalence of O. viverrini infection is still observed in a rural community of Chachoengsao Province, central Thailand. The overall prevalence of Opisthorchis-like eggs using microscopic examination was 16.8%. PCR-RFLP profiles showed the predominant infection of O. viverrini (9.6%) including very low infections of other small intestinal flukes, Haplorchis taichui (0.08%) and Euparyphium albuferensis (0.08%). The genetic structure of O. viverrini populations in central Thailand was also described and revealed a non-significant difference in genetic diversity. In addition, the genetic background of the O. viverrini populations was closely related to the isolate from Lao PDR.
Conclusions/Significance
Our study highlighted the prevalence of O. viverrini infection in central Thailand indicating that control programs and health education regarding opisthorchiasis is still required in this endemic area. Additionally, the study demonstrated the genetic structure of O. viverrini, in central Thailand which could provide information on the molecular epidemiology of this parasite.
Author summary
O. viverrini infection is highly prevalent in northern and northeastern Thailand. The diagnosis of the infection is usually achieved by finding the eggs in feces. However, these eggs are difficult to differentiate morphologically from other Opisthorchis-like eggs. Our study evaluated the prevalence and molecular characterization of Opisthorchis-like eggs in fecal samples collected from 2,609 villagers living in a rural community, in central Thailand, using PCR-RFLP analysis of ITS2 region. This study insists that Sanamchaikate District, Chachoengsao Province, central area, is one of the areas for O. viverrini infection. To understand the transmission dynamics of O. viverrini in the study area, the genetic structure of O. viverrini was also assessed using cox1 and nad1 sequences. The O. viverrini populations showed monophyly and the genetic background was closely related to one isolate from Lao PDR.
Introduction
Opisthorchis viverrini, a fish-borne trematode (FBT), is one of the main public health problems in Southeast Asia, while Clonorchis sinensis is commonly found in Japan, the Republic of Korea, China, Taiwan and Vietnam [1,2]. In Thailand, more than 3.3 million people are predominantly infected with O. viverrini, the distribution of which varies depending on endemic areas [3]. Infection with O. viverrini is often asymptomatic, while heavy infection may lead to obstructive jaundice. Other symptoms could occur, including relapsing cholangitis, periductal fibrosis, cholecystitis and/or cholelithiasis [4,5]. The most severe sequelae of O. viverrini and C. sinensis infections, is cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), of which the highest incidence of 93.8–317.6 per 100,000 person-years has been reported in northeastern Thailand [6–9]. Currently, the carcinogenic potential of Opisthorchis felineus has been reported, and further investigation into the compelling evidence that O. felineus infection could cause CCA is needed [10–12]. The gold standard for diagnosis of liver fluke infection is the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) [13,14]; moreover, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [15–18] and molecular techniques [19–29] were also developed to detect the infection. Since O. viverrini and small intestinal flukes; such as Haplorchis taichui, Haplorchis pumilio, Haplorchis yogokawai, Heterophyes heterophyes and other usually share the same endemic area and the route of transmission, co-infections are commonly found. [30]. The eggs of O. viverrini and those of small intestinal flukes are very similar in size and shape and cannot be clearly discriminated under light microscope. Thus, these eggs are identified as Opisthorchis-like eggs for which a molecular technique is required for genus and species identification [31,32]. Specific primers or DNA probes have been developed to detect O. viverrini eggs in fecal samples as well as several larval stages of O. viverrini in Bithynia snails and metacercariae in cyprinoid fish [19–29,33,34]. Among several genetic markers used to differentiate Opisthorchis-like eggs, the internal transcribe spacer 1 (ITS1) and internal transcribe spacer 2 (ITS2) of the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes have been recently used as markers to discriminate O. viverrini, C. sinensis, and small intestinal flukes [23,24]. Moreover, the mitochondrial gene, cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1), NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (nad1) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (nad2), have also been used to discriminate O. viverrini from C. sinensis and H. taichui [22,26,35]. Recently, genetic diversity on species complex of O. viverrini has been found in different geographical areas in Thailand and Lao PDR using multilocus enzyme electrophoresis analyses (MEE) [36,37]. Analyses include random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) [38], mitochondrial DNA sequencing [39,40] and microsatellite marker analysis [41]. Using the mitochondrial nad1 and cox1 sequences, different haplotypes were found among O. viverrini isolates in northeastern Thailand, as well as in Lao PDR [39]. In contrast, no genetic diversity of O. viverrini was found among isolates of O. viverrini from Thailand, Cambodia and Lao PDR using nad1 sequence analysis [40].
Apart from northern and northeastern Thailand, rural communities of central Thailand including in Sanamchaikate District, Chachoengsao Province, have been shown to be the endemic areas of O. viverrini infection in central Thailand [42,43]. Due to the migration of local people from northeastern provinces now living in this community, life styles as well as the habit of consuming undercooked or raw freshwater fish have not changed. Related studies have shown a higher prevalence of 21.3% in 2009 [42] and 24.0% in 2013 [43] compared with the average prevalence of 3.8% reported in central Thailand [44]. In addition, Traub et al. first reported C. sinensis infection among Thai villagers living in this community [24]. Thus, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of O. viverrini and other FBT infections in fecal specimens from people living in three villages located in Sanamchaikate District, Chachoengsao Province. The species of Opisthorchis-like eggs were determined using PCR-RFLP analysis of ITS2 region. Genetic diversity and the population structure of O. viverrini infection have been studied in northeast Thailand, except for those in this study area. Studying the genetic background of O. viverrini would help to understand the molecular epidemiology and transmission dynamics of the parasite. Thus, we first described the genetic background of O. viverrini infection in a rural community, central Thailand, using DNA sequence analysis of the mitochondrial genes, cox1 and nad1.
Materials and methods
Study area
A cross-sectional study was conducted in a rural community, Sanamchaikate District, Chachoengsao Province, Central Thailand, 228 km east of Bangkok. Villagers from the three villages were enrolled in the study, that is, Na-Ngam, Thoong-Heang and Na-Yao Villages. Proper anthelminthic treatment and health education were provided for those who had intestinal parasitic infections. Opisthorchis-like egg–infected cases were treated with a single dose of praziquantel (40 mg/kg).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of The Royal Thai Army Medical Department (Ref. S025h/51 and S045h/54) and Mahidol University Institutional Review Board (MU-IRB) (Ref. MU-IRB 2014/018.0108). Written informed consent was obtained from the enrolled participants or parents of young participants using standard protocols approved by the Ethics Committee of the Royal Thai Army Medical Department, Thailand.
Fecal sample collection
A total of 2,609 fecal samples were collected from participants living in three villages. Of these, 689 samples from Thoong-Heang and 858 from Na-Ngam villagers were collected in February and September 2008, respectively with the remaining 1,062 samples from Na-Yao villagers being collected in February 2013. Fecal samples were examined for Opisthorchis-like eggs using simple wet smear, Kato thick smear method and phosphate buffer saline (PBS) ethyl acetate concentration technique. Opisthorchis like-eggs positivity was defined as the presence of the eggs in the fecal specimen examined by at least one of the three methods.
DNA extraction of Opisthorchis-like eggs
Opisthorchis-like eggs collected from PBS ethyl acetate sediments were used for DNA extraction. A 200 μl aliquot of each positive sample was treated with 1.4 mL ATL tissue lysis buffer (Qiagen), mixed continuously for 1 min or until the stool samples were thoroughly homogenized. The suspension was subjected to PBS incubation technique [28] and 5 cycles of freezing in liquid nitrogen followed by thawing at 98°C to 100°C [24] to break up the eggs. Subsequently, the suspension was heated at 70°C for 5 min before continuously mixing and centrifuging at 20,000 g for 1 min to sediment fecal pellets. Then 1.2 mL of supernatant was transferred into a new 2 mL microcentrifuge tube. The DNA was extracted from the supernatant using the QIAmp DNA stool mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. At the final step, DNA was eluted with 50 μl of elution buffer. At the final step, DNA was eluted with 50 μl of elution buffer. DNA extraction of the positive control (O. viverrini eggs) was also performed and doubled distilled water was used as negative control. Other negative fecal samples using wet smears, Kato thick smear and PBS ethyl acetate concentration technique were not used for the PCR assay.
PCR and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) methods for discriminating eggs of O. viverrini, C. sinensis and small intestinal flukes
The RTFluke primers designed for ITS2 region of opisthorchiid and heterophyid flukes, were used to amplify DNA extracts of the eggs [24]. PCR amplifications were carried out in a final volume of 50 μl, consisting of DNA template, 12.5 pmol of RTFlukeFa; 5'- CTTGAACGCACATTGCGGCC-3’ and RTFlukeRa; 5'-CACGTTTGAGCCGAGGTCAG-3', 200 μM dNTP, 2 mM of MgCl2, 1X buffer PCR and 1 unit of Taq polymerase (5U/μl) (Promega). The PCR products were amplified in the Mastercycle personal (Bio-Rad). The PCR assay consisted of an initial stage of denaturation 94°C for 15 min, annealing temperature at 60°C for 1 min, extension step at 72°C for 2 min followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 60°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 30 sec, a final extension at 72°C for 7 min and a holding temperature of 12°C to complete the amplification. The amplicons of O. viverrini, C. sinensis and H. taichui were 375, 381 and 526 bp, respectively [24].
The PCR products at 375 bp and 381 bp were subjected to PCR-RFLP while PCR products of 526 bp were sent for DNA sequencing. PCR-RFLP was performed to discriminate eggs of O. viverrini and C. sinensis using a restriction enzyme, FauI. PCR products were digested with 2 units of FauI (New England Biolabs) in a total volume of 20 μl at 55°C for 6 to 8 h.
Genetic diversity and genetic structure of O. viverrini using the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (cox1) and the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 gene (nad1)
To study the genetic diversity of O. viverrini eggs, the PCR assays were performed according to Bauthong et al., 2005 [28]. The primers, COXI-OvF; 5′-TGATCCGTTGTTGTTTCA-3′ and COXI-OvR; 5′-ACGGATATAACCACCGTTCT-3′) were used for cox1. The primers for nad1 were NADI-OvF; 5′-TGTTGAAGATGATTGAG-3′ and NADI-OvR; 5′-CAAGGTTAACCTAACGA-3′, respectively. The PCR assay was performed in a total volume of 50 μl, consisting of DNA template, 25 pmol of each primer, 200 μM dNTP, 2 mM of MgCl2, 1X buffer, 1X enhancer, and 1 unit of KAPA2G Robust Hotstart polymerase (5U/μl) (KAPA Biosystems). The PCR products were amplified in the Mastercycle personal (Bio-Rad). The PCR assay of COXI-Ov primer was initiated at predenaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing at 58°C for 30 sec, extension at 72°C for 30 sec, final extension was 72°C for 7 min and the holding temperature at 12°C to complete amplification. For NADI-Ov primer, the predenaturation temperature was 95°C for 5 min followed by denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, the annealing temperature at 55°C for 30 sec, extension step at 72°C for 30 sec, final extension at 72°C for 7 min, and the holding temperature at 12°C [28]. The PCR products were run on a 2% agarose gel in 1X Tris/borate/EDTA (TBE) buffer. For DNA staining, 10 mL of agarose gel was mixed with 0.3 μl SYBR safe DNA Gel Stain (Invitrogen). A 100 bp DNA ladder (Vivantis Technologies) was used as the marker to estimate the sizes of PCR products. The PCR products were run at 100 V at room temperature for 40 min. Finally, the agarose gel was visualized by molecular image Gel doc XR+ Imaging System (Bio-Rad). The PCR products were purified before DNA sequencing using QIAquick Gel extraction kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All PCR products were sent to the First BASE laboratories (First BASE Laboratories) for DNA sequencing. The sequences were subjected to NCBI BLAST search to examine nucleotide sequences and identify species [45]. The DNA sequences were aligned using BioEdit software, version 7.0.9 to observe similarities [46].
Population genetic analysis of the cox1 and nad1 sequences
To study population genetics, a total of 90 ITS2-PCR positive samples were randomly selected from the three villages (30 samples from each village). Genetic analysis of the cox1 and nad1 of FTB was performed to assess haplotype diversity numbers (Hd), segregation sites between populations (S) and nucleotide diversity (Pi) using DnaSP, version 5.10.1. [47]. The cox1 and nad1 evolutionary neutrality of the DNA sequences were evaluated using Tajima's D tests [48], Fu's Fs test [49] and Arlequin, version 3.5.2.2 [50]. The statistical significance of neutrality tests including Tajima’s D, and Fu’s Fs to examine genetic hitchhiking, population expansion, selective sweep and bottleneck were determined at 95% interval (p <0.05). The haplotype networks were constructed using median-joining network from the Network 5.0.0.0 program, which is available at http://www.fluxus-engineering.com.
Phylogenetic trees of the cox1 and nad1 of O. viverrini and other trematodes
To generate a phylogenetic tree, the cox1 and nad1 sequences were separately aligned with reference cox1 and nad1 sequences of O. viverrini using ClustalW program in BioEdit software, version 7.1.9 [46]. The reference sequences of cox1 and nad1 of O. viverrini with C. sinensis as an outgroup, were retrieved from GenBank for phylogenetic tree analysis. The Randomized Axelerated Maximum Likelihood (RAxML) trees of different genes, cox1 and nad1, were constructed based on RAxML version 7.4.2 with a GTR matrix (GTR + Γ model) [51] using raxmlGUI version 1.3 [52]. The clade stability of the branding topologies of cox1 and nad1 sequences was evaluated using 1,000 replicates of RAxML bootstrap values.
Accession numbers
All data are available through the NCBI data base with the following accession numbers, cox1 sequences: EU022353.1, EU022351.1, EU022354.1, EU022356.1, EU022355.1, EU022360.1, EU022364.1, EU022363.1, EU022362.1, EU022352.1, EU022357.1, EU022358.1, EU022359.1, JF739555.1 and JN936215.1 nad1 sequences: EU022338.1, EU022344.1, EU022349.1, EU022346.1, EU022345.1, EU022348.1, EU022350.1, EU022343.1, EU0222334.1, EU022337.1, EU022342.1, EU022339.1, EU022347.1, JF739555.1, DQ119551.1, EU022340.1, GQ401040.1, DQ882172.1, EU443831.1, DQ882175.1, DQ882173.1, EU443833.1, EU443832.1, DQ882174.1, GQ401082.1 and JF729304.1.
Results
The prevalence of Opisthorchis-like eggs and O. viverrini
A total of 298 Opisthorchis-like egg positive fecal samples were available for DNA extraction and PCR assays (Fig 1). To identify species of Opisthorchis-like eggs, the ITS2-PCR assay gave specific amplicons of 375, 381 and 526 bp for O. viverrini, C. sinensis and H. taichui, respectively. The ITS2-PCR sensitivities and prevalence of Opisthorchis-like egg infection in Thoong-Heang, Na-Yao and Na-Ngam Villages are shown in Table 1. The PCR-RFLP products showed the fragments of 129 bp and 247 bp for O. viverrini but gave an undigested amplicon for C. sinensis (Fig 2). As shown in Table 1, of 253 ITS2-PCR samples, PCR-RFLP profiles of O. viverrini were as follows: 7.8% (54/689) from Thoong-Heang Village, 12.5% (107/858) from Na-Ngam Village and 8.3% (88/1,062) from Na-Yao Village. Mixed infection of O. viverrini and H. taichui was observed at 0.23% (2/858) in Na-Ngam Village and 0.2% (2/1,062) of Euparyphium albuferensis infection was detected in Na-Yao Village. Thus, the overall infection of O. viverrini, H. taichui and E. albuferensis was 9.6% (251/2,609), 0.08% (2/2,609) and 0.08% (2/2,609), respectively. The PCR products of 520 bp revealed H. taichui and E. albuferensis, which were confirmed by DNA sequencing and NCBI BLAST search.
Table 1. The prevalences of Opisthorchis-like egg, ITS2-PCR sensitivities and PCR-RFLP profiles for detection Opisthorchis-like eggs in Chachoengsao Province, central Thailand.
Village | Prevalence | ITS2-PCR sensitivity | Parasite identification by PCR-RFLP (Number) |
---|---|---|---|
Thoong-Heang | 12.6% (87/689) | 90.0% (54/60) | O. viverrini (54) |
Na-Yao | 12.2% (130/1,062) | 75.0% (90/120) |
O. viverrini (88) E. albuferensis (2) |
Na-Ngam | 25.9% (222/857) | 92.4% (109/118) |
O. viverrini (107) O. viverrini and H. taichui (2) |
Total | 16.8% (439/2,609) | 84.9% (253/298) |
Population genetic analysis using the cox1 and nad1 sequences of O. viverrini
The PCR products of mitochondrial cox1 and nad1 were 504 bp and 780 bp, respectively [28]. Of the 90 ITS2-PCR positive samples, 60 (66.7%) cox1 and 45 (50.0%) nad1 could be successfully amplified, bidirectionally sequenced and were used for population genetics analysis. Using the cox1 sequences, O. viverrini isolated from Na-Yao Village revealed the highest genetic diversity while reference isolates showed the lowest genetic diversity. The results of neutrality testing for O. viverrini from the three villages did not significantly differ using both Fu's Fs and Tajima's D test (p>0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2. The indicators of genetic diversity and neutrality tests in the populations of O. viverrini from three villages using cox1 sequences.
Populations | No. of samples |
Haplotype | S | Genetic diversity | Neutrality tests | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hd | Pi | Tajima' s D (p value) |
Fu's Fs (p value) |
||||
Na-Yao | 19 | 12 | 28 | 0.871 | 0.031 +/ 0.016 | 1.418* | 0.238* |
Thoong-Heang | 18 | 8 | 26 | 0.824 | 0.026 +/-0.013 | 0.810* | 2.751* |
Na-Ngam | 19 | 8 | 9 | 0.614 | 0.009 +/-0.005 | -0.359* | -0.515* |
Reference isolates | 15 | 3 | 5 | 0.514 | 0.003 +/- 0.002 | -0.657* | 1.412* |
Total populations | 69 | 29 | 55 | 0.892 | 0.024 +/- 0.012 | -0.761* | -4.048* |
S = no. of segregation sites (polymorphic), Hd = haplotype diversity, Pi = nucleotide diversity. Statistical significance: p < 0.05.
* p>0.05, not significantly different.
Regarding the nad1 sequences of O. viverrini, the nad1 sequences from those collected from reference isolates revealed the highest genetic diversity while the lowest genetic diversity was found among those of Thoong-Heang Village. Moreover, the neutrality tests of nad1 did not significantly differ using both Fu's Fs and Tajima’s D test (p>0.05) (Table 3).
Table 3. The indicators of genetic diversity and neutrality tests in the populations of O. viverrini from three villages using nad1 sequences.
Populations | No. of samples | Haplotype | S | Genetic diversity | Neutrality tests | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hd | Pi | Tajima' s D (p value) |
Fu's Fs (p value) |
||||
Na-Yao | 15 | 9 | 40 | 0.800 | 0.018 +/- 0.010 | -0.266* | 1.449* |
Thoong-Heang | 13 | 5 | 22 | 0.692 | 0.013+/-0.007 | 0.950* | 4.579* |
Na-Ngam | 14 | 6 | 16 | 0.736 | 0.010 +/- 0.005 | 0.763* | 2.085* |
Referent isolates | 25 | 13 | 13 | 0.917 | 0.012 +/-0.006 | -0.456* | -0.538 * |
Total populations | 67 | 31 | 80 | 0.951 | 0.021 +/-0.010 | -1.071* | -2.673* |
S = no. of segregation sites (polymorphic), Hd = haplotype diversity, Pi = nucleotide diversity. Statistical significance: p < 0.05.
* p>0.05, not significantly different.
Haplotype networks of cox1 and nad1 sequences in the populations of O. viverrini
The haplotype network of 29 haplotypes from 69 cox1 sequences from three villages and the reference isolates revealed relative haplotypes in the populations of O. viverrini. Haplotype M, which presented the highest frequency of isolates, was dominant and contained 20 isolates; 12 isolates from Na-Ngam Village, seven from Thoong-Heang Village and one isolate from Lao PDR (JF739555.1). However, 22 isolates were determined to be singleton; Haplotypes B, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, V, W, Y, Z and A1. Moreover, nine singletons (Haplotypes D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K and L) from Na-Yao Village showed a distinct genetic difference from the other haplotypes. Additionally, the reference isolates from Thailand and Lao PDR were grouped as Haplotypes B1 and C1 (Fig 3A).
The network of 31 haplotypes from 67 nad1 sequences showed closely related haplotypes. Haplotype G had the highest frequency of isolates consisting of 9 isolates; 7 isolates from Na-Ngam Village, one isolate from Na-Yao Village and one isolate from Lao PDR (JF739555.1). The nad1 haplotype network revealed 20 singletons (Haplotypes B, C, D, E, F, H, I, K, M, N, O, P, R, S, T, U, V, Y, Z and E2). Two haplotypes (E and F) from Na-Yao Village and five haplotypes (J, K, L, M and N) from Thoong-Heang Village demonstrated the genetic diversity from the other haplotypes. Moreover, reference isolates from Thailand, Lao PDR, Vietnam and Cambodia were clustered in 11 haplotypes (T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, A1, B1, D1 and E1). From the cox1 and nad1 haplotype networks, O. viverrini, isolated from Na-Yao and Thoong-Heang Villages, showed a higher genetic difference than those from Na-Ngam Village or reference isolates (Fig 3B).
Phylogenetic trees based on the cox1 and nad1 sequences of O. viverrini
The list of selected cox1 and nad1 reference sequences used in the RAxML tree construction is shown in Table 1. Figs 4 and 5 illustrate the phylogenetic relationships among of O. viverrini generated by RAxML based on 393 and 668 bp of the cox1 and nad1, respectively. The tree topologies of two genes, cox1 and nad1, showed concordance that reference isolates of O. viverrini were mostly clustered in monophyletic group with high bootstrap value (90%) in cox1 (Fig 4) but low (<50%) in nad1 (Fig 5), whereas O. viverrini in the study showed to be paraphyletic to the reference isolates. Low bootstrap value (<50%) demonstrates potentially shift in divergent order causing uncertain diversity among our O. viverrini in nad1 tree but not in cox1 tree. In addition, two clades containing 13 isolates from Thoong-Heang Village and two isolates from Na-Yao Village were separated by strong bootstrap values to support 100% (Fig 5). Moreover, O. viverrini in central Thailand is clearly distinct from common O. viverrini found within Southeast Asia, i.e., northeastern Thailand, Lao PDR, Vietnam and Cambodia because there is no O. viverrini of central Thailand grouping in the same reference cluster as the commonly found O. viverrini (Figs 4 and 5).
Discussion
The overall O. viverrini infection from PCR-RFLP profiles among the three villages was 9.6% which was higher than the average prevalence (3.8%) reported in central Thailand [44]. However, positive identification of O. viverrini might have been underestimated because the sensitivity of ITS2-PCR assay was only 84.9% and 141 positive fecal samples were unavailable for molecular analysis. In this study, especially in Na-Ngam Village, using microscopic examination, the prevalence of Opisthorchis-like eggs infection was 25.9%, the highest prevalence among the three villages. Related studies have reported the prevalence of O. viverrini infection was 21.3% conducted in Na-Yao Village, Sanamchaikate District in 2009 [42] and was 24.0% in 2013 in the same area [43]. Independent risk factors associated with O. viverrini infection included age over 60 years and consuming fresh raw fish salad [42,43]. The predominant FBT infection found in this study was O. viverrini infection (9.6%), confirming Sanamchaikate District as one of the endemic area of O. viverrini infection in central Thailand. Although public health interventions for FBT are available in the area i.e., access to treatment for infected people, re-infection with FBT is very common due to the unchanged eating habits of the rural elderly. A foundation to prevent and control O. viverrini infection should focus on improving knowledge of disease severity, reducing risk habits of becoming infected, treating infected individuals as well as promoting self-awareness of people in the community.
Using the RTFluke primers, the sensitivity of the PCR obtained from this study was higher when compared with 71.0% sensitivity performed in one related report [24]. Although most fecal samples obtained for this study revealed light infection of Opisthorchis-like eggs (Eggs per gram of feces <1,000), we used a combination technique of breaking up the eggs using freeze-thawing plus PBS incubation to increase the efficiency of DNA extraction [24,28]. However, some fecal samples were unavailable for DNA extraction and PCR assays due to an insufficient amount of feces for the PBS ethyl acetate concentration technique. Thus, discrimination results of those samples could not be obtained. The negative PCR assay results might have been due to strong PCR inhibitors in fecal samples and unsuccessful breaking up of the eggs. Thus, improvements in DNA extraction as well as the PCR assay to detect Opisthorchis-like eggs in fecal samples are still required, particularly for those with only a light infection.
Interestingly, using PCR-RFLP analysis of ITS2 region, a related cross-sectional study conducted in Na-Yao Village in 2009 firstly revealed C. sinensis infection among Thai villagers. Eggs and adults of C. sinensis were recovered from stool samples [24]. The presence of C. sinensis is well known in northern part of Vietnam and northern including southern parts of China. However, only one report of human C. sinensis infection was found in central Thailand [24]. The result urged us to explore the real situation of C. sinensis infection in Sanamchaikate District. Of the 253 samples positive for Opisthorchis-like eggs, none were identified as eggs of C. sinensis using the ITS2-PCR assay [24]. As a result, at present, O. viverrini is the only human liver fluke identified in fecal samples of villagers. A related report of C. sinensis infection in this area in 2009 could be an uncommon situation when a group of people acquired C. sinensis infection [24]. The specific time and exact location of consuming the infected uncooked fish contaminated with C. sinensis metacercariae could not be determined. Those infected fish may therefore have been brought from outside the country. Unfortunately, in-depth interviews of the sources of food consumption from those infected people were not performed at that time. Thus, from our negative results of C. sinensis eggs using the ITS2-PCR assay of Opisthorchis-like eggs, persistent C. sinensis infection in this community has not been evidently proved. To confirm the C. sinensis life cycle in the study area, the infected snail intermediate host, Melanoides tuberculata, as well as infected cyprinoid fish with metacercariae need to be observed.
PCR-RFLP profiles in this study revealed not only O. viverrini infection, but mixed infection of O. viverrini and H. taichui were also observed. The PCR products of E. albuferensis showed the same size as H. taichui and similar agarose gel results; therefore, DNA sequencing was required for species identification. Regarding the non-comparative number of O. viverrini infections, the prevalence of both H. taichui and E. albuferensis were less than 1%. In our study, stool examination revealed operculated trematode eggs of 90 to 120 μm in size, similar to those of the medium intestinal trematodes. The ITS2-PCR assay and nucleotide sequencing confirmed human E. albuferensis infection in a central community of Thailand. However, little is known about the pathology of E. albuferensis in human infection since one report of Euparyphium sp. infection was first described in Lao PDR in 2012 [53]. To the best of our knowledge, E. albuferensis is a trematode in the family Echinostomaidae, the medium intestinal trematode, of which freshwater snails are the first and second intermediate hosts in the life cycle. The first snail intermediate host is Gyraulus chinensis, while various kinds of snails (Lymnaea truncatula, L. peregra, L. palustris and Physa acuta) could serve as a second intermediate host [54]. Thus, the consumption of raw or uncooked freshwater snails is the source of infection. H. taichui, is a small intestinal fluke, commonly reported in many parts of Thailand, where the highest prevalence has been reported in northern Thailand [55,56]. However, none of the related studies have confirmed H. taichui infection in central Thailand. Our study revealed two infections of FBT, predominantly O. viverrini and a minority of H. taichui, identified from Opisthorchis–like eggs in the study area.
This study is the first to reveal the genetic structure of O. viverrini in central Thailand. The neutrality tests were used to determine evolutionary changes at molecular level and genetic differentiation between species and without significance using the cox1 and nad1. Sequences analysis of O. viverrini eggs using Fu’s Fs test revealed no population expansion and population bottleneck of O. viverrini in this community. Together with Tajima’s D test of the cox1 and nad1 sequences, no statistical significance of the test could confirm a lack of population size expansion and lack of decrease in population size or balancing selection. As a result, the populations of O. viverrini obtained from the three villages were defined as monophyly. Elderly individuals in Sanamchaikate District originally moved from the northeastern region; thus, they could have harbored O. viverrini and transmitted it to the area. Our results also agreed with the previous study that the populations of O. viverrini along the Mekong River including Thailand, Lao PDR and Cambodia were monophyly using nad1 sequence analysis [40]. The haplotype networks and RAxML phylogenetic analysis of the cox1 and nad1 sequences indicated that O. viverrini isolated from Na-Yao and Thoong-Heang Villages revealed genetic differences from the reference isolates [30]. Haplotype M from cox1 and Haplotype G from nad1 were extremely frequent and contained most isolates from Na-Ngam Village and Lao PDR (JF739555.1), indicating that they were possibly an older haplotype than the singletons and widely distributed throughout this community. In addition, O. viverrini nucleotide sequences obtained from this study were not clustered with reference isolates except O. viverrini (JF739555.1) from Lao PDR; therefore, it was probably the original isolate of O. viverrini in this community. However, no significant differences of genetic diversity were observed within and among O. viverrini populations. Our results supported the previous studies stating that nad1 is a powerful molecular marker to study genetic relationships of O. viverrini [39,40]. This study has shown the diversity of O. viverrini in central Thailand that could potentially be an isolated population, whereas factors of genetic diversity are unclear. Thus, more studies of the genetic diversity of O. viverrini in this endemic area should be conducted using other powerful genetic markers as well as to study a number of samples collected from other communities of nearby provinces. Moreover, using a single O. viverrini egg-PCR assays for studying genetic structure could significantly increase the reliability of the test.
In conclusion, the ITS2-PCR assay has proved useful for detecting and characterizing Opisthorchis-like eggs. Our study confirmed that the endemic area of opisthorchiasis is still remained in Sanamchaikate District, a rural community of Chachoengsao Province, central Thailand. The genetic structure of O. viverrini in this study area is more closely related to O. viverrini from Lao PDR than to species from northeastern Thailand.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge The Faculty of Graduate Studies, Mahidol University for partial support in this study.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. All sequence data is available through GenBank data base with the following accession numbers, cox1 sequences: EU022353.1, EU022351.1, EU022354.1, EU022356.1, EU022355.1, EU022360.1, EU022364.1, EU022363.1, EU022362.1, EU022352.1, EU022357.1, EU022358.1, EU022359.1, JF739555.1 and JN936215.1 nad1 sequences: EU022338.1, EU022344.1, EU022349.1, EU022346.1, EU022345.1, EU022348.1, EU022350.1, EU022343.1, EU0222334.1, EU022337.1, EU022342.1, EU022339.1, EU022347.1, JF739555.1, DQ119551.1, EU022340.1, GQ401040.1, DQ882172.1, EU443831.1, DQ882175.1, DQ882173.1, EU443833.1, EU443832.1, DQ882174.1, GQ401082.1 and JF729304.1.
Funding Statement
This work received financial support from The Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Programme (Grant No. PHD/1076/2552), Thailand Research Fund (TRF)(Grant No. PHD/1076/2552) and Phramongkutklao Research Fund. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Chai JY, Darwin Murrell K, Lymbery AJ. Fish-borne parasitic zoonoses: status and issues. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35: 1233–1254. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Conlan JV, Sripa B, Attwood S, Newton PN. A review of parasitic zoonoses in a changing Southeast Asia. Vet Parasitol. 2005;182: 22–40. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wongsaroj T, Nithikathkul C, Rojkitikul W, Nakai W, Royal L, Rammasut P. National survey of helminthiasis in Thailand. Asain Biomed. 2014;8: 779–783. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pungpak S, Riganti M, Bunnag D, Harinasuta T. Clinical features in severe Opisthorchiasis viverrini. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1985;16: 405–409. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Elkins DB, Haswell-Elkins MR, Mairiang E, Mairiang P, Sithithaworn P, Kaewkes S, et al. A high frequency of hepatobiliary disease and suspected cholangiocarcinoma associated with heavy Opisthorchis viverrini infection in a small community in north-east Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1990;84: 715–719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sripa B, Sithithaworn P, Sirisinha S. Opisthorchis viverrini and opisthorchiasis: the 21st century review. Acta Trop. 2003;88: 169–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sriamporn S, Pisani P, Pipitgool V, Suwanrungruang K, Kamsa-ard S, Parkin DM. Prevalence of Opisthorchis viverrini infection and incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in Khon Kaen, Northeast Thailand. Trop Med Int Health: TM & IH. 2004;9: 588–594. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01234.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sripa B, Kaewkes S, Sithithaworn P, Mairiang E, Laha T, Smout M, et al. Liver fluke induces cholangiocarcinoma. PLoS Med. 2007;4: e201 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sripa B, Kaewkes S, Intapan PM, Maleewong W, Brindley PJ. Food-borne trematodiases in Southeast Asia epidemiology, pathology, clinical manifestation and control. Adv Parasitol. 2010;72: 305–350. doi: 10.1016/S0065-308X(10)72011-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Maksimova GA, Zhukova NA, Kashina EV, Lvova MN, Katokhin AV, Tolstikova TG, et al. Role of Opisthorchis felineus on induction of bile duct cancer. Parazitologiia. 2015;49: 3–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pakharukova MY, Mordvinov VA. The liver fluke Opisthorchis felineus: biology, epidemiology and carcinogenic potential. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2016;110: 28–36. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trv085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maksimova GA, Pakharukova MY, Kashina EV, Zhukova NA, Kovner AV, Lvova MN, et al. Effect of Opisthorchis felineus infection and dimethylnitrosamine administration on the induction of cholangiocarcinoma in Syrian hamsters. Parasitol Int. 2017;66: 458–463. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2015.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sithithaworn P, Tesana S, Pipitgool V, Kaewkes S, Pairojkul C, Sripa B, et al. Relationship between faecal egg count and worm burden of Opisthorchis viverrini in human autopsy cases. Parasitology. 1991;102 Pt 2: 277–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sayasone S, Utzinger J, Akkhavong K, Odermatt P. Repeated stool sampling and use of multiple techniques enhance the sensitivity of helminth diagnosis: a cross-sectional survey in southern Lao People's Democratic Republic. Acta Trop. 2015;141: 315–321. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Srivatanakul P, Viyanant V, Kurathong S, Tiwawech D. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Opisthorchis viverrini infection. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1985;16: 234–239. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Poopyruchpong N, Viyanant V, Upatham ES, Srivatanakul P. Diagnosis of opisthorchiasis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using partially purified antigens. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 1990;8: 27–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tesana S, Srisawangwong T, Sithithaworn P, Itoh M, Phumchaiyothin R. The ELISA-based detection of anti-Opisthorchis viverrini IgG and IgG4 in samples of human urine and serum from an endemic area of north-eastern Thailand. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2007;101: 585–591. doi: 10.1179/136485907X229068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Watwiengkam N, Sithithaworn J, Duenngai K, Sripa B, Laha T, Johansen MV, et al. Improved performance and quantitative detection of copro-antigens by a monoclonal antibody based ELISA to diagnose human opisthorchiasis. Acta Trop. 2013;128: 659–665. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wongratanacheewin S, Pumidonming W, Sermswan RW, Maleewong W. Development of a PCR-based method for the detection of Opisthorchis viverrini in experimentally infected hamsters. Parasitology. 2001;122: 175–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Duenngai K, Sithithaworn P, Rudrappa UK, Iddya K, Laha T, Stensvold CR, et al. Improvement of PCR for detection of Opisthorchis viverrini DNA in human stool samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46: 366–368. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01323-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Intapan PM, Thanchomnang T, Lulitanond V, Pongsaskulchoti P, Maleewong W. Rapid molecular detection of Opisthorchis viverrini in human fecal samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81: 917–920. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2009.09-0275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lovis L, Mak TK, Phongluxa K, Soukhathammavong P, Sayasone S, Akkhavong K, et al. PCR diagnosis of Opisthorchis viverrini and Haplorchis taichui infections in a Lao community in an area of endemicity and comparison of diagnostic methods for parasitological field surveys. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47: 1517–1523. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02011-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sato M, Thaenkham U, Dekumyoy P, Waikagul J. Discrimination of O. viverrini, C. sinensis, H. pumilio and H. taichui using nuclear DNA-based PCR targeting ribosomal DNA ITS regions. Acta Trop. 2009;109: 81–83. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Traub RJ, Macaranas J, Mungthin M, Leelayoova S, Cribb T, Murrell KD, et al. A new PCR-based approach indicates the range of Clonorchis sinensis now extends to Central Thailand. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3: e367 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wongsawad C, Wongsawad P. Opisthorchis viverrini and Haplorchis taichui: development of a multiplex PCR assay for their detection and differentiation using specific primers derived from HAT-RAPD. Exp Parasitol. 2012;132: 237–242. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kaewkong W, Intapan PM, Sanpool O, Janwan P, Thanchomnang T, Laummaunwai P, et al. Molecular differentiation of Opisthorchis viverrini and Clonorchis sinensis eggs by multiplex real-time PCR with high resolution melting analysis. Korean J Parasitol. 2013;51: 689–694. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2013.51.6.689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cai XQ, Yu HQ, Li R, Yue QY, Liu GH, Bai JS, et al. Rapid detection and differentiation of Clonorchis sinensis and Opisthorchis viverrini using real-time PCR and high resolution melting analysis. ScientificWorldJournal 2014;2014: 893981 doi: 10.1155/2014/893981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Buathong S, Leelayoova S, Mungthin M, Naaglor T, Taamasri P, Suwannahitatorn P, et al. Development and evaluation of PCR methods based on cytochrome c oxidase subunit one (cox1) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit one gene (nad1) to detect Opisthorchis viverrini in human fecal samples. Parasitol Res. 2015;114: 3547–3549. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4640-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lamaningao P, Kanda S, Laimanivong S, Shimono T, Darcy AW, Phyaluanglath A, et al. Development of a PCR Assay for Diagnosing Trematode (Opisthorchis and Haplorchis) Infections in Human Stools. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96: 221–228. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kaewkes S, Elkins DB, Sithithaworn P, Haswell-Elkins MR. Comparative studies on the morphology of the eggs of Opisthorchis viverrini and lecithodendriid trematodes. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1991;22: 623–630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Radomyos B, Wongsaroj T, Wilairatana P, Radomyos P, Praevanich R, Meesomboon V, et al. Opisthorchiasis and intestinal fluke infections in northern Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1998;29: 123–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sukontason KL, Sukontason K, Piangjai S, Pungpak S, Radomyos P. Prevalence of Opisthorchis viverrini infection among villagers harboring Opisthorchis-like eggs. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2001;32: 23–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Scholz T, Ditrich O, Giboda M. Differential diagnosis of opisthorchiid and heterophyid metacercariae (Trematoda) infecting flesh of cyprinid fish from Nam Ngum Dam Lake in Laos. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1991;22: 171–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Parvathi A, Umesha KR, Kumar S, Sithithaworn P, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I. Development and evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the detection of Opisthorchis viverrini in fish. Acta Trop. 2008;107: 13–16. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Le TH, Van De N, Blair D, Sithithaworn P, McManus DP. Clonorchis sinensis and Opisthorchis viverrini: development of a mitochondrial-based multiplex PCR for their identification and discrimination. Exp Parasitol. 2006;112: 109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2005.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Saijuntha W, Sithithaworn P, Wongkham S, Laha T, Pipitgool V, Tesana S, et al. Evidence of a species complex within the food-borne trematode Opisthorchis viverrini and possible co-evolution with their first intermediate hosts. Int J Parasitol. 2007;37: 695–703. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.12.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kiatsopit N, Sithithaworn P, Boonmars T, Tesana S, Chanawong A, Saijuntha W, et al. Genetic markers for studies on the systematics and population genetics of snails, Bithynia spp., the first intermediate hosts of Opisthorchis viverrini in Thailand. Acta Trop. 2011;118: 136–141. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sithithaworn P, Nuchjungreed C, Srisawangwong T, Ando K, Petney TN, Chilton NB, et al. Genetic variation in Opisthorchis viverrini (Trematoda: Opisthorchiidae) from northeast Thailand and Laos PDR based on random amplified polymorphic DNA analyses. Parasitol Res. 2007;100: 613–617. doi: 10.1007/s00436-006-0304-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Saijuntha W, Sithithaworn P, Wongkham S, Laha T, Chilton NB, Petney TN, et al. Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation among geographical isolates of Opisthorchis viverrini in Thailand and Lao PDR, and phylogenetic relationships with other trematodes. Parasitology. 2008;135: 1479–1486. doi: 10.1017/S0031182008005015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Thaenkham U, Nuamtanong S, Sa-nguankiat S, Yoonuan T, Touch S, Manivong K, et al. Monophyly of Opisthorchis viverrini populations in the lower Mekong Basin, using mitochondrial DNA nad1 gene as the marker. Parasitol Int. 2010;59: 242–247. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2010.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Laoprom N, Sithithaworn P, Ando K, Sithithaworn J, Wongkham S, Laha T, et al. Microsatellite loci in the carcinogenic liver fluke, Opisthorchis viverrini and their application as population genetic markers. Infect Genet Evol. 2010;10: 146–153. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rangsin R, Mungthin M, Taamasri P, Mongklon S, Aimpun P, Naaglor T, et al. Incidence and risk factors of Opisthorchis viverrini infections in a rural community in Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81: 152–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Suwannahitatorn P, Klomjit S, Naaglor T, Taamasri P, Rangsin R, Leelayoova S, et al. A follow-up study of Opisthorchis viverrini infection after the implementation of control program in a rural community, central Thailand. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6: 188–188. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jongsuksuntigul P, Imsomboon T. Opisthorchiasis control in Thailand. Acta Trop. 2003;88: 229–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215: 403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hall AT. BioEdit: a user friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis programme for Window95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999; No. 41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics. 2003;19: 2496–2497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tajima F. The effect of change in population size on DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989;123: 597–601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fu YX. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997;147:915–925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Excoffier L, Lischer HE. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10: 564–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousonds of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006;22: 2688–2690. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Silvestro D, Michalak I. raxmlGUI: A graphic font-end for RaxML. Org Divers Evol. 2012;12: 335–337. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chai JY, Sohn WM, Yong TS, Eom KS, Min DY, Hoang EH, et al. Echinostome flukes receovered from humans in Khammouane Province, Lao PDR. Korean J Parasitol. 2012;50: 269–272. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2012.50.3.269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Muñoz-Antoli C, Marin A, Vidal A, Toledo R, Esteban JG. Euparyphium albuferensis and Echinostoma friedi (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae): experimental cercarial transmission success in sympatric snail communities. Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2008;55: 122–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nithikathkul C, Wongsawad C. Prevalence of Haplorchis taichui and Haplorchoides sp. metacercariae in freshwater fish from water reservoirs, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Korean J Parasitol. 2008;46: 109–112. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2008.46.2.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wijit A, Morakote N, Klinchid J. High prevalence of haplorchiasis in Nan and Lampang Provinces, Thailand, proven by adult worm recovery from suspected opisthorchiasis Cases. Korean J Parasitol. 2013;51: 767–769. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2013.51.6.767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. All sequence data is available through GenBank data base with the following accession numbers, cox1 sequences: EU022353.1, EU022351.1, EU022354.1, EU022356.1, EU022355.1, EU022360.1, EU022364.1, EU022363.1, EU022362.1, EU022352.1, EU022357.1, EU022358.1, EU022359.1, JF739555.1 and JN936215.1 nad1 sequences: EU022338.1, EU022344.1, EU022349.1, EU022346.1, EU022345.1, EU022348.1, EU022350.1, EU022343.1, EU0222334.1, EU022337.1, EU022342.1, EU022339.1, EU022347.1, JF739555.1, DQ119551.1, EU022340.1, GQ401040.1, DQ882172.1, EU443831.1, DQ882175.1, DQ882173.1, EU443833.1, EU443832.1, DQ882174.1, GQ401082.1 and JF729304.1.