DeCoursey suggests that ‘frozen water’ may block cation flux through the central crevice of the Hv1 VS domain. However, individual water molecules are dynamic, and may enter or leave this site during MD simulations (Ramsey et al. 2010; Wood et al. 2012; Kulleperuma et al. 2013). Finite time‐averaged water occupancy at the constriction point (near D112/D1.51, F150/F2.50 and either R2/R208/R4.50 or R3/R211/R4.53, depending on the model) evidently results from transient hydrogen bonds between water and protein atoms that restrict water mobility (Ramsey et al. 2010, Wood et al. 2012; Kulleperuma et al. 2013). Consistent with our hypothesis that the ‘aqueous’ conductance (G AQ) is mediated by an ensemble of interconvertible water–protein hydrogen bond structures, experimental evidence demonstrates that Hv1 is remarkably refractory to amino acid mutagenesis (Ramsey et al. 2010; Musset et al. 2011; Morgan et al. 2013; Randolph et al. 2016). The water–protein hydrogen bond network in Hv1 may also explain biophysical properties of PT that are distinct from ice or simple water wires (i.e. gramicidin A), as outlined by DeCoursey.
Experimental data indicate that maintaining charge at D112/D1.51 and R3/R211/R4.53 is necessary for high H+ selectivity (Berger & Isacoff, 2011; Musset et al. 2011), suggesting that the flux of mobile cations and anions through Hv1 is prevented by the fixed anion or cation at these sites. Neutralization of D112/D1.51 during PT, as proposed by DeCoursey and colleagues (Dudev et al. 2015), would therefore also be expected to erode selectivity. A more parsimonious explanation is that waters mediate PT and create a pathway for the diffusion of mobile solution ions that is readily measurable only in mutant Hv1 channels.
Furthermore, D112V is the only mutation that is convincingly non‐functional (Musset et al. 2011; Morgan et al. 2013); other substitutions are tolerated and H+‐permeable (Musset et al. 2011). Replacement of Asp with the aliphatic Val could allow 112 V to interact with other nearby hydrophobic groups, potentially expelling waters from the central crevice and trapping the channel in a PT‐incompetent conformation. We accordingly find that the D112/D1.51 side chain is nestled between I2.46, L2.47, V3.53 and I4.44 in a resting‐state Hv1 model structure (Randolph et al. 2016).
Lastly, we note that the guanidinium ion (Gu+) is structurally identical to the side chain of Arg residues that constitute gating charges in the S4 helix (Gonzalez et al. 2013). The observation that N214R (N4R) results in voltage‐dependent block of activated‐state G AQ indicates that voltage‐dependent movement of S4 Arg side chains through the central crevice (i.e. ‘gating pore’) is sufficient to explain open–closed gating in Hv1 (Randolph et al. 2016), as proposed previously (Vargas et al. 2012; Gonzalez et al. 2013). In the Hv1 B model, the R3/R211/R4.53 side chain is extracellular to D112/D1.51, allowing G AQ to remain open. If Gu+ fits into this crevice better than other similarly sized monovalent organic cations, it could permeate without breaking salt bridges.
Call for comments
Readers are invited to give their views on this and the accompanying CrossTalk articles in this issue by submitting a brief (250 word) comment. Comments may be submitted up to 6 weeks after publication of the article, at which point the discussion will close and the CrossTalk authors will be invited to submit a ‘LastWord’. Please email your comment, including a title and a declaration of interest, to jphysiol@physoc.org. Comments will be moderated and accepted comments will be published online only as ‘supporting information’ to the original debate articles once discussion has closed.
Additional information
Competing interests
None declared.
Author contributions
Both authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All persons designated as authors qualify for authorship, and all those who qualify for authorship are listed.
Linked articles This article is part of a CrossTalk debate. Click the links to read the other articles in this debate: https://doi.org/10.1113/JP274495, https://doi.org/10.1113/JP274553 and https://doi.org/10.1113/JP274982.
References
- Berger TK & Isacoff EY (2011). The pore of the voltage‐gated proton channel. Neuron 72, 991–1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dudev T, Musset B, Morgan D, Cherny VV, Smith SM, Mazmanian K, DeCoursey TE & Lim C (2015). Selectivity mechanism of the voltage‐gated proton channel, HV1. Sci Rep 5, 10320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gonzalez C, Rebolledo S, Perez ME & Larsson HP (2013). Molecular mechanism of voltage sensing in voltage‐gated proton channels. J Gen Physiol 141, 275–285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kulleperuma K, Smith SM, Morgan D, Musset B, Holyoake J, Chakrabarti N, Cherny VV, DeCoursey TE & Pomes R (2013). Construction and validation of a homology model of the human voltage‐gated proton channel hHv1. J Gen Physiol 141, 445–465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morgan D, Musset B, Kulleperuma K, Smith SM, Rajan S, Cherny VV, Pomes R & DeCoursey TE (2013). Peregrination of the selectivity filter delineates the pore of the human voltage‐gated proton channel hHv1. J Gen Physiol 142, 625–640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Musset B, Smith SM, Rajan S, Morgan D, Cherny VV & Decoursey TE (2011). Aspartate 112 is the selectivity filter of the human voltage‐gated proton channel. Nature 480, 273–277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramsey IS, Mokrab Y, Carvacho I, Sands ZA, Sansom MS & Clapham DE (2010). An aqueous H+ permeation pathway in the voltage‐gated proton channel Hv1. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17, 869–875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Randolph AL, Mokrab Y, Bennett AL, Sansom MS & Ramsey IS (2016). Proton currents constrain structural models of voltage sensor activation. Elife 5, e18017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vargas E, Yarov‐Yarovoy V, Khalili‐Araghi F, Catterall WA, Klein ML, Tarek M, Lindahl E, Schulten K, Perozo E, Bezanilla F & Roux B (2012). An emerging consensus on voltage‐dependent gating from computational modeling and molecular dynamics simulations. J Gen Physiol 140, 587–594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wood ML, Schow EV, Freites JA, White SH, Tombola F & Tobias DJ (2012). Water wires in atomistic models of the Hv1 proton channel. Biochim Biophys Acta 1818, 286–293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
