Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2017 Nov 16;5(46):e01290-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01290-17

Complete Genome Sequence of Bacillus cereus C1L, a Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacterium from the Rhizosphere of Formosa Lily in Taiwan

Chien-Jui Huang a, Po-Xing Zheng b, Jheng-Yang Ou b, Yao-Cheng Lin b,, Chao-Ying Chen c,
PMCID: PMC5690342  PMID: 29146835

ABSTRACT

Bacillus cereus C1L, a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, provides protection against fungal pathogens in monocot plants. To gain new insights into the biocontrol mechanisms used by this rhizobacterium, we determined the complete genome sequence of B. cereus C1L. One chromosome and three plasmids were identified with a total size of ~6.0 Mb.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Bacillus cereus C1L, isolated from the rhizosphere of Lilium formosanum at Buluowan in Taroko National Park, Hualien, Taiwan, is a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium. B. cereus C1L promotes the growth of monocot plants such as lily and maize and provides protection against botrytis leaf blight and southern leaf blight, respectively (1, 2). The availability of the B. cereus C1L genome sequence will provide a resource for in-depth study of the factors/mechanisms involved in the biocontrol of plant diseases.

The complete genome of Bacillus cereus C1L was sequenced by using an Illumina Hiseq2000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and MinION (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, United Kingdom). Reads from MinION were assembled into long contigs by Poretools, Canu, and Pilon (35). Reads from Illumina were used to correct long contigs and fill the gaps through Pilon, GapFiller, SSPACE, and SPAdes tools (3, 68). The coding regions were predicted by GeneMarkS (9), and gene function was predicted by protein sequence search against the NCBI nonredundant RefSeq protein and SwissProt databases. The clusters of orthologous groups (COGs) of proteins were identified by reverse PSI-BLAST against the NCBI Conserved Domain Database according to the report by Galperin et al. (10). The noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), rRNAs, and tRNAs were predicted by using the Infernal search tool (11) against Rfam database version 12.2 (12). The prophages were predicted by PHASTER (13).

Four circular contigs were obtained, including 1 chromosome and 3 plasmids. The size of the B. cereus C1L chromosome is 5,312,355 bp, with four prophage fragments. In addition, three circular plasmids of 715,614 bp, 9,105 bp, and 10,473 bp were named pC1L1, pC1L69, and pC1L8, respectively. A total of 6,059 protein-coding sequences (CDS) and 456 ncRNAs were predicted by using the computational tools mentioned above. Among predicted CDS, we identified 38 two-component sensor histidine kinases and 50 response regulators. We also identified 184 trans and 12 cis regulatory ncRNAs, including 54 potential riboswitches and 7 thermoregulators, suggesting that B. cereus C1L may have complex sensing and regulatory mechanisms to adapt to versatile environments and regulate its gene expression. Furthermore, four and two nonribosomal peptide synthetase gene clusters were found in chromosome and plasmid pC1L1, respectively. Further investigation is necessary to clarify their contributions to the biocontrol mechanism of B. cereus C1L.

Accession number(s).

The complete genome sequence of B. cereus C1L has been deposited at GenBank under accession number CP022445. The accession numbers of plasmids pC1L1, pC1L69, and pC1L8 are CP022446, CP022447, and CP022448, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was financed by the Ministry of Technology, Taiwan, Republic of China (97-2317-B-002-001), the Council of Agriculture, Taiwan, Republic of China (98AS-1.2.1-ST-ac) and National Taiwan University (99R40044) (to C.-Y.C.) and also in part by the startup fund from the Biotechnology Center in Southern Taiwan, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taiwan, Republic of China (to Y.-C.L.).

We are grateful to the National Center for High-Performance Computing, Taiwan, Republic of China, for computer time and facilities. The efforts of Y.-H. Liu, Y.-F. Hsiao, and J.-F. Tsai are also appreciated. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Footnotes

Citation Huang C-J, Zheng P-X, Ou J-Y, Lin Y-C, Chen C-Y. 2017. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus cereus C1L, a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium from the rhizosphere of Formosa lily in Taiwan. Genome Announc 5:e01290-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01290-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Liu YH, Huang CJ, Chen CY. 2008. Evidence of induced systemic resistance against Botrytis elliptica in lily. Phytopathology 98:830–836. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-98-7-0830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Huang CJ, Yang KH, Liu YH, Lin YJ, Chen CY. 2010. Suppression of southern corn leaf blight by a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus cereus C1L. Ann Appl Biol 157:45–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2010.00408.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Loman NJ, Quinlan AR. 2014. Poretools: a toolkit for analyzing nanopore sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:3399–3401. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. 2017. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Boetzer M, Pirovano W. 2012. Toward almost closed genomes with GapFiller. Genome Biol 13:R56. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Boetzer M, Pirovano W. 2014. SSPACE-LongRead: scaffolding bacterial draft genomes using long read sequence information. BMC Bioinformatics 15:211. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. 2001. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2607–2618. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.12.2607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Galperin MY, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. 2015. Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D261–D269. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nawrocki EP, Eddy SR. 2013. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics 29:2933–2935. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nawrocki EP, Burge SW, Bateman A, Daub J, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Floden EW, Gardner PP, Jones TA, Tate J, Finn RD. 2015. Rfam 12.0: updates to the RNA families database. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D130–D137. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, Liang Y, Wishart DS. 2016. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W16–W21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES