Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Commun (Camb). 2017 Nov 14;53(91):12306–12308. doi: 10.1039/c7cc07149c

Dopamine coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles as enzyme mimics for the sensitive detection of bacteria

Shazia Mumtaz a, Li-Sheng Wang b, Syed Zajif Hussain a, Muhammad Abdullah a, Zill-e-Huma a, Zafar Iqbal a, Brian Creran b, Vincent M Rotello b, Irshad Hussain a
PMCID: PMC5690545  NIHMSID: NIHMS917394  PMID: 29094116

Abstract

We report a simple and economical colorimetric bacterial sensing strategy with catalytic amplification using dopamine-capped iron oxide (Dop-Fe3O4) nanoparticles. These nanoparticles catalyse the oxidation of a chromogenic substrate in the presence of H2O2 into a green colored product. The catalytic activity of the nanoparticles is inhibited in the presence of bacteria, providing naked eye detection of bacteria at 104 cfu/mL and by spectrophotometric detection down to 102 cfu/mL.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms917394u1.jpg

Colorimetric sensing of bacteria using dopamine-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles.


According to the World Health Organization, more than 25% of all global deaths (15 million out of total 57 million) are due to infectious diseases, many of which are caused by bacteria.1 Major sources of infectious diseases are contaminated water and food.2 Microbial detection is a key step in the prevention of these types of infectious and deadly diseases.3 The standard technique for bacteria determination is culturing and plating, a relatively inexpensive and sensitive technique, but it requires lengthy incubation for reliable results.4 Molecularly-amplified methods such as PCR, NASBA (nucleic acid sequence based amplification) and enzyme amplified methods (e.g. ELISA) have reduced detection time and enhanced overall sensitivity, but these techniques are expensive and require laboratory facilities.5 Recently, nanomaterials (carbon nanotubes, silicon nanowires, magnetic nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles/nanorods, polymer brushes etc.) have been integrated into sensing strategies to help improve detection and discrimination of bacteria. 613

Enzyme-amplified colorimetric sensing methods are attractive because they provide visual readouts without the need of sophisticated instrumentation.11 However, these methods have issues due to the high cost of enzymes, their instability, and challenges in extraction and purification.14,15 Synthetic enzymatic mimics have been used to address these concerns, including metal and metal oxide/sulphide nanoparticles (Au, Ag, Pt, Au@Pt, Pd-Ir, Fe3O4, CeO2, V2O5, CuO, MnO2, CoFeO4, Fe3S4, CuS and CoS), carbon nanotubes etc., feature higher stability than enzymes over a wide range of pH levels and temperature.1632 More widely, the enzymatic mimicking property of Fe3O4-NPs has been used to replace horseradish peroxidase (HRP) in traditional immunoassay techniques and to achieve colorimetric sensing of proteins using catalytically amplified sensor arrays.21, 33 Inspired by this catalytically amplified Fe3O4-NPs based colorimetric sensing of proteins,34 we report the rapid enzyme-free colorimetric detection of bacteria by using dopamine-capped magnetic ferrite nanoparticles (Dop-Fe3O4-NPs) that serve as both recognition and transduction elements. As shown in Fig. 1, a colorimetric response is produced by the oxidation of a chromogenic substrate 2, 2′-azino- bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) into a green colored product by a peroxidase mimetic nanoparticles (Dop-Fe3O4-NPs) in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Binding of the cationic nanoparticles34 to the anionic surface of bacteria blocks access of substrate to the nanoparticle core, providing turn-off colorimetric sensing of bacteria.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Catalytically amplified colorimetric sensing of bacteria by using Dop-Fe3O4 NPs as enzymatic mimetic.

Dop-Fe3O4 NPs were prepared by modifying Haiou’s method for bacterial sensing studies.35 Briefly, diethylene glycol (DEG) capped iron oxide nanoparticles were synthesized by co-precipitation at 220 °C followed by post-functionalization with dopamine through labile ligand exchange method to avoid polydopamine formation in basic media (Fig. S1). The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image indicates narrow size distribution of Dop-Fe3O4 NPs with an average size of ca. 8 nm (Fig. 2A). Powder XRD spectroscopy was used to describe the phase characteristics of Fe3O4 NPs (Fig. S3) whereas EDX spectroscopy was performed for elemental analysis (Fig. S4). The high dispersability of nanoparticles in aqueous media along with a zeta potential value of +31.3 mV indicates the surface modification with positively charged dopamine ligands through catechol-like moiety, which was further confirmed by the prominent peaks appearing at 1612 cm−1 and 1502 cm−1 due to free N—H primary amino group bending vibrations by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (Fig. 2B) and the fragmentation pattern observed at m/z values of 151, 134 and 120 by MALDI-TOF spectrometry (Fig. 2C and S5).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A)TEM image of Dop- Fe3O4 NPs; (B) FTIR-spectra of a: dopamine ligand and b: Dop- Fe3O4 NPs; (C) MALDI-TOF spectra showing fragmentation pattern of Dop- Fe3O4 NPs.

For catalytic activity studies, a colorimetric reaction of ABTS with H2O2 was performed. The colorimetric response of oxidized ABTS with H2O2 was amplified in the presence of Dop-Fe3O4 nanoparticles as compared to the reaction in the absence of nanoparticles (Fig. 3). Furthermore this response was completely turned off in the presence of high concentration of bacteria (i.e. 108 cfu/mL). The blockage in catalytic activity of nanoparticles resulted from electrostatic interaction with anionic cell surface of bacteria,9 indicating that this catalytically amplified colorimetric strategy can be used for sensing of bacteria.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Optical density measurements (OD) when ABTS reacts with H2O2 (A) in the absence of Dop-Fe3O4 NPs, (B) in the presence of Dop-Fe3O4 NPs, and (C) in the presence of Dop-Fe3O4 NPs and high concentration (108 cfu/mL) of bacteria respectively. Inset showing the visual colorimetric response. OD at 420 nm, 0.67 mM ABTS, 6.25 mM hydrogen peroxide and 20 μg/mL Dop-Fe3O4 NPs (Fe 0.367 ppm solution) in 5 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.6).

We used Escherichia coli (XL1), a Gram-negative bacteria, and Bacillus subtilis (DH), a Gram-positive bacteria, as model analytes for bacterial sensing studies. A turn-off colorimetric strategy was used for the detection of bacteria. The intensity of colorimetric response due to catalytic activity of Dop-Fe3O4 nanoparticles was decreased by the addition of different concentrations of E. coli and eventually was completely inhibited in the presence of high concentration of bacteria i.e., 108 cfu/mL., resulting in detectable visible color change down to 104 cfu/mL (Fig. 4A). The gradual decrease in colorimetric response was also monitored by recording the absorption spectra of oxidized ABTS in the presence of a range of E.coli concentrations from 102 to 108 cfu/mL (Fig. S8). The gradual decrease in optical density measurements at 420nm in the presence of bacteria further improved the limit of detection (LOD) down to 102 cfu/mL (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) Colorimetric response when ABTS is reacting with H2O2 catalysed by Dop-Fe3O4 NPs in the presence of different concentrations of bacteria; (B) Graph of sensor response, with line graph inset showing gradual decrease in optical density at 420 nm with increasing bacterial count.

The changes in catalytic activity of Dop-Fe3O4 nanoparticles were also observed by using the Gram-positive model analyte Bacillus subtilis (DH). We observed a detectible visual colorimetric change down to 104 cells/mL of Bacillus subtilis (B.sub) concentration. When optical density measurements at 420 nm of the colorimetric reaction were recorded in the presence of B.sub (DH), the observed results were comparable to E.coli (Fig. S9). Overall, this turn-off colorimetric sensor provides naked eye limit of detection of bacteria for E.coli and B.sub down to 104 cfu/mL, and further down to 102 cfu/mL by using spectroscopic mode of multiplate reader.

In conclusion, a simple, facile and an inexpensive enzyme free turn-off colorimetric methodology is developed by integration of Dop-Fe3O4 nanoparticles. These nanoparticles act as both transducer and recognition element by interacting with the surface of bacteria, which results in naked eye detection of bacterial concentration as low as 104 cfu/mL in solution, which is further improved to 102 cfu/mL by spectrophotometric measurement. This sensing methodology provides a low-cost strategy for determination of drinking water contamination that can be further used for microfluidic/paper devices for biosensing and biomedical diagnostics.

Supplementary Material

esi

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by Higher Education Commission Pakistan (HEC) and the US National Academy of Sciences to financially support this study through US-Pakistan Science and Technology Cooperation Programme. Support is also acknowledged from the NIH (GM077173 and EB EB022641).

Footnotes

Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available. Experimental details, characterization, as well as additional figures for sensing strategy. See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x

Notes and references

  • 1.Morens DM, Folkers GK, Fauci AS. Nature. 2004;430:242–249. doi: 10.1038/nature02759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, Tauxe RV. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5:607. doi: 10.3201/eid0505.990502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kaittanis C, Santra S, Perez JM. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2010;62:408–423. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Deisingh AK, Thompson M. Analyst. 2002;127:567–581. doi: 10.1039/b109895k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Belgrader P, Benett W, Hadley D, Richards J, Stratton P, Mariella R, Milanovich F. Science. 1999;284:449–450. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5413.449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zelada-Guillén GA, Riu J, Düzgün A, Rius FX. Angew Chem. 2009;48:7334–7337. doi: 10.1002/anie.200902090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li YQ, Zhu B, Li Y, Leow WR, Goh R, Ma B, Fong E, Tang M, Chen X. Angew Chem. 2014;53:5837–5841. doi: 10.1002/anie.201310135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu F, Mu J, Wu X, Bhattacharjya S, Yeow EKL, Xing B. Chem Commun. 2014;50:6200–6203. doi: 10.1039/c4cc01266f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sun Y, Zhao C, Yan Z, Ren J, Qu X. Chem Commun. 2016;52:7505–7508. doi: 10.1039/c6cc02672a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhou H, Yang D, Ivleva NP, Mircescu NE, Niessner R, Haisch C. Anal Chem. 2014;86:1525–1533. doi: 10.1021/ac402935p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Miranda OR, Li X, Garcia-Gonzalez L, Zhu ZJ, Yan B, Bunz UH, Rotello VM. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:9650–9653. doi: 10.1021/ja2021729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang C, Irudayaraj J. Small. 2008;4:2204–2208. doi: 10.1002/smll.200800309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Phillips RL, Miranda OR, You CC, Rotello VM, Bunz UH. Angew Chem. 2008;47:2590–2594. doi: 10.1002/anie.200703369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shoji E, Freund MS. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:3383–3384. doi: 10.1021/ja005906j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wei H, Wang E. Anal Chem. 2008;80:2250–2254. doi: 10.1021/ac702203f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yun J, Li B, Cao R. Chem Commun. 2010;46:8017–8019. doi: 10.1039/c0cc02698k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jiang H, Chen Z, Cao H, Huang Y. Analyst. 2012;137:5560–5564. doi: 10.1039/c2an35911a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gao Z, Xu M, Hou L, Chen G, Tang D. Anal Chim Acta. 2013;776:79–86. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.He W, Liu Y, Yuan J, Yin JJ, Wu X, Hu X, Zhang K, Liu J, Chen C, Ji Y. Biomaterials. 2011;32:1139–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xia X, Zhang J, Lu N, Kim MJ, Ghale K, Xu Y, McKenzie E, Liu J, Ye H. ACS Nano. 2015;9:9994–10004. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b03525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gao L, Zhuang J, Nie L, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Gu N, Wang T, Feng J, Yang D, Perrett S. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:577–583. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mumtaz S, Wang LS, Abdullah M, Hussain SZ, Iqbal Z, Rotello VM, Hussain I. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2017;50:11LT02. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jiao X, Song H, Zhao H, Bai W, Zhang L, Lv Y. Anal Methods. 2012;4:3261–3267. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Andre R, Natalio F, Humanes M, Leppin J, Heinze K, Wever R, Schroder HC, Muller WE, Tremel W. Adv Funct Mater. 2011;21:501–509. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen W, Chen J, Liu AL, Wang LM, Li GW, Lin XH. ChemCatChem. 2011;3:1151–1154. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu X, Wang Q, Zhao H, Zhang L, Su Y, Lv Y. Analyst. 2012;137:4552–4558. doi: 10.1039/c2an35700c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shi W, Zhang X, He S, Huang Y. Chem Commun. 2011;47:10785–10787. doi: 10.1039/c1cc14300j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ding C, Yan Y, Xiang D, Zhang C, Xian Y. Microchim Acta. 2016;183:625–631. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dutta AK, Das S, Samanta S, Samanta PK, Adhikary B, Biswas P. Talanta. 2013;107:361–367. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yang H, Zha J, Zhang P, Xiong Y, Su L, Ye F. RSC Adv. 2016;6:66963–66970. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Song Y, Wang X, Zhao C, Qu K, Ren J, Qu X. Chem Eur J. 2010;16:3617–3621. doi: 10.1002/chem.200902643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wei H, Wang E. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:6060–6093. doi: 10.1039/c3cs35486e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li X, Wen F, Creran B, Jeong Y, Zhang X, Rotello VM. Small. 2012;8:3589–3592. doi: 10.1002/smll.201201549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Berfield JL, Wang LC, Reith ME. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:4876–4882. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.8.4876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Qu H, Caruntu D, Liu H, O’Connor CJ. Langmuir. 2011;27:2271–2278. doi: 10.1021/la104471r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

esi

RESOURCES