Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 18;9(10):1141. doi: 10.3390/nu9101141

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies.

Author (Year) Country Outcome Study Period (Months) Type of Pregnancy n
Control
n
Intervention
Supplement Started GA (Weeks) Mean Age (Years) Mean GA at Enrolment (Weeks) Mean GA at Delivery (Weeks) SBP (mmHg) DBP (mmHg) BMI (kg/m2) Weight Gain (g/Week) Nulliparity (%)
Calcium vs. Placebo
Aghamohammadi (2015) [28] Iran PE - High Risk Women 40 40 <20 weeks 37.15 - - - - 26.8 - -
Almirante (1998) [29] Philippines PE - High Risk Women 210 212 <20 weeks - 18.00 - - - - - 100.00
Bassaw (1998) [30] Bangladesh Both 36 Low Risk Women 250 81 <20 weeks 27 - 38.6 - - - - -
Belizan (1991) [31] Argentina Both 33 High Risk Women 588 579 ≥20 weeks 23.70 20.80 - 103.95 66.45 - - 100.00
Crowther (1999) [32] Australian Both 53 Low Risk Women 229 227 ≥20 weeks 24.70 18.37 - 115.80 68.20 26.60 - 100.00
Kumar (2009) [33] New Delhi PE 36 Low Risk Women 251 273 <20 weeks 21.85 17.83 38.44 113.19 74.00 23.35 - -
Levine (1997) [34] US Both 36 Low Risk Women 2294 2295 <20 weeks 21.00 17.15 38.90 106.50 59.70 - - 100.00
Lopez-Jaramillo (1997) [35] Ecuador PE 56 High Risk Women 135 125 ≥20 weeks 15.99 20.00 39.13 - - - 414.19 100.00
Lopez-Jaramillo (1990) [37] Ecuador Both 30 Low Risk Women 34 22 ≥20 weeks 19.4 - - - - - - 100.00
Lopez-Jaramillo (1989) [36] Ecuador GH/PIH 30 Low Risk Women 43 49 ≥20 weeks 18.47 23.00 - - - - 430.80 100.00
Nenad (2011) [38] Serbia Both - Low Risk Women 4588 4590 <20 weeks - 18.50 - - - - - 100.00
Niromanesh (2001) [39] Iran Both - High Risk Women 15 15 ≥20 weeks 23.15 29.70 38.60 - - - - -
Puwar (1996) [40] India Both 15 Low Risk Women 93 97 ≥20 weeks 21.93 18.07 37.50 103.02 63.32 - - 100.00
Rogers (1999) [41] Hong Kong GH/PIH 30 High Risk Women 75 144 ≥20 weeks 27.31 21.67 38.9 - - - - 100.00
Sanchez-Ramos (1994) [42] Florida Both 55 High Risk Women 34 29 ≥20 weeks 18.38 24.44 - 113.50 64.01 - - 100.00
Villar (1987) [11] Baltimore, Argentina GH/PIH 36 Low Risk Women 27 25 ≥20 weeks 21.10 - - - - - 388.2 100.00
Villar (1990) [44] Baltimore Both 36 High Risk Women 88 90 ≥20 weeks 16.25 23.55 38.55 102.75 61.10 - - 85.26
Villar (2006) [43] Argentina, Egypt, India, Peru, South Africa, Vietnam Both 21 Low Risk Women 4161 4151 <20 weeks 22.65 15.10 - 105.05 60.80 21.90 - 100.00
Wanchu (2001) [45] India PE - High Risk Women 50 50 ≥20 weeks - 14.2 - 111.57 72.45 - - 100.00
Vitamin D vs. Placebo
Asemi (2013) [46] Iran PE 4 High Risk Women 27 27 ≥20 weeks 17.44 26 - - - 30.8 - -
Naghshineh (2016) [47] Iran PE 5 High Risk Women 70 68 <20 weeks 25 - 37.4 - - - - 100.00
Sablok (2015) [48] India PE 36 High Risk Women 57 108 <20 weeks - - - - - - - 100.00
Calcium plus Vitamin D vs. Placebo
Asemi (2012) [49] Pakistan PE 11 High Risk Women 25 24 ≥20 weeks 24.9 - - - - 27.58 - 100.00
Marya (1987) [50] India PE - Low Risk Women 200 200 ≥20 weeks - 22.00 - - - - - -
Taherian (2002) [52] Iran PE 36 Low Risk Women 330 330 ≥20 weeks 21.55 20.00 38.80 97.25 57.88 22.55 10.25 * -
Samimi (2015) [51] Iran PE 6 High Risk Women 30 30 ≥20 weeks 27.2 - - 111.7 72.4 26.5 - -
Calcium plus Vitamin D vs. Calcium
Hossain (2014) [53] Pakistan Both 21 Low Risk Women 89 86 ≥20 weeks 25.57 20.00 37.61 - - 23.64 - -

n = number of subjects, GA = Gestational Age (weeks), SBP = Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg), DBP = Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg), BMI = Mean Body Mass Index (kg/m2), PE = Preeclampsia only, GH/PIH = Gestational Hypertension or Pregnancy Induced Hypertension only, Both = Both PE or GH/PIH, * Mean weight gain in kg.