Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 17.
Published in final edited form as: Cephalalgia. 2009 May 11;29(12):1277–1284. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01873.x

Opiate-induced persistent pronociceptive trigeminal neural adaptations: potential relevance to opiate-induced medication overuse headache

M De Felice 1, F Porreca 1
PMCID: PMC5693217  NIHMSID: NIHMS918979  PMID: 19438917

Abstract

Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a challenging, debilitating disorder that develops from the frequent use of medications taken for the treatment of migraine headache pain. MOH affects an estimated 3–5% of the general population. The mechanisms underlying the development of MOH remain unknown. Opiates are one of the major classes of medications used for the treatment of migraine at least in some countries, including the USA. Although the effects of repeated opiate use for headache are unknown, it is possible that opiate use may contribute to increased frequency and occurrence of such headaches. Recent preclinical studies exploring the neuroadaptive changes following sustained exposure to morphine may give some insights into possible causes of MOH. Peripherally, these changes include increased expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in trigeminal primary afferent neurons. Centrally, they include increased excitatory neurotransmission at the level of the dorsal horn and nucleus caudalis. Critically, these neuroadaptive changes persist for long periods of time and the evoked release of CGRP is enhanced following morphine pretreatment. Stimuli known to elicit migraine, such as nitric oxide donors or stress, produce hyperalgesia in morphine- but not in saline-pretreated rats even long after the discontinuation of the opiate. CGRP plays a prominent role in initiating vasodilation of the intracranial blood vessels and subsequent headache. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated increased excitability of the nociceptive pathway in migraine sufferers, and CGRP receptor antagonists have been shown to be efficacious in migraine pain. Thus, such persistent neuroadaptive changes may be relevant to the processes that promote MOH.

Keywords: Headache, migraine, CGRP, cutaneous allodynia, central sensitization

Introduction

The American Migraine Study II estimates that 28 million Americans suffer from migraine headache. The phenomenon of frequent use of anti-headache medication that can either worsen the initial headache disorder, or even create a new form of daily headache, has been described with a variety of different names. Among the most frequently used terms are: rebound headache, chronic migraine, daily migraine, analgesic overuse headache, and medication overuse headache (MOH). According to the International Headache Society, MOH is defined as a condition involving interaction between a therapeutic agent used excessively and a susceptible patient in which headaches occur on ≥ 15 days per month. The most common cause of migraine-like headache or tension-type-like headache is overuse of symptomatic migraine drugs and/or analgesics. Chronic tension-type headache (TTH) is less often associated with medication overuse but, especially among patients seen in headache centres, episodic TTH has commonly become a chronic headache through overuse of analgesics (1). Furthermore, the headache associated with medication overuse often has a peculiar pattern that can shift, even within the same day, from having migraine-like characteristics to those of TTH (1). The diagnosis of MOH is clinically extremely important because patients rarely respond to preventative medications while overusing acute medications (1).

The TTH (experienced by > 50% of the population) and migraine (experienced by 10%) are the most frequent forms of primary headache. MOH is now recognized as a major cause of chronic daily headache (14) that affects approximately 4% of the general population, representing one-quarter of those suffering from chronic daily headache (58). MOH can be diagnosed when headache occurs on ≥ 15 days a month and has characteristics that include: bilateral, dull pain of light to moderate intensity; drug intake including ergots, triptans and opioids for > 10 days per month; the use of analgesics for > 15 days for at least 3 months; and the resolution of the condition after discontinuation of the medication (24, 9). When the occasional headache strikes, most people take an over-the-counter pain medication. The overuse or misuse of pain relievers can result in ‘rebound’ into another headache, and may initiate MOH (9). The mechanisms by which MOH occurs remains unknown and can be influenced by genetic factors, neuroplastic changes and psychotropic effects (10). Genetic factors are important for the development of MOH, because only patients with TTH, but not those with cluster headache, develop MOH and frequently patients with a history of migraine, who need to take analgesics on a regular basis for non-headache painful disorders, may develop MOH.

Recent preclinical studies suggest that medications themselves can elicit neuroadaptive changes that may contribute to this phenomenon. In the case of opiates, morphine has been shown to produce increased expression of excitatory neurotransmitters in primary afferent fibres as evaluated in dorsal root ganglion cells from the lumbar spinal cord in rodents. Among these adaptive changes is an increase in expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) (11, 12). Furthermore, in tissues taken from animals pretreated with morphine for some period of time (i.e. days) evoked release of CGRP from primary afferents is greatly enhanced, suggesting a mechanism for increased excitatory transmission that may be relevant to headache pain (11). In addition to such adaptive changes that can be observed in primary afferents, sustained delivery of opiates can enhance processes of descending pain facilitation arising from the rostral ventromedial medulla (1316). Collectively, these neuroadaptive changes result in a state of hypersensitivity to normally non-noxious tactile and to noxious thermal stimulation. Such pronociceptive neuro-adaptations might be hypothesized to alter the response to triggers of migraine and enhance the frequency of the headaches.

Migraine and the trigeminal system

The trigeminal sensory complex comprises two nuclei, the main nucleus responsible for the messages resulting in tactile sensation, and the spinal nucleus, which includes three subnuclei, the oralis, interpolaris and caudalis. Several investigations regarding nociceptive transmission in the nucleus caudalis have revealed similarities with spinal nociceptive transmission, and this region has been referred to as the medullary dorsal horn (17). The integration between trigeminal sensory neurons and cranial blood vessels has been termed the trigeminovascular system. Local vasodilation of intracranial extracerebral blood vessels, such as those supplying the dura mater, and consequent stimulation of surrounding trigeminal perivascular afferent neurons may be important mechanisms underlying migraine headache pain (18). In addition to relaying nociceptive information, meningeal perivascular nociceptive afferents have also been suggested to release sensory neuropeptides, including CGRP and substance P, which cause vasodilation and inflammation of intracranial blood vessels. Activation of the primary afferent neurons that innervate the blood vessels and the dura elicits nociceptive signals relevant to headache pain (17, 19, 20). Multiple studies have shown that stimulation of the blood vessels and sinus can produce headache-like pain (21, 22). Additionally agents that produce vasodilation of the intracranial blood vessel have been used to induce migraine headache experimentally.

Many studies have shown that injection of nitro-glycerin, a potent vasodilator and nitric oxide (NO) donor, induces experimental migraine headache in human volunteers (2326). Infusion of a NO donor in normal subjects induces a rapid-onset headache that usually disappears within minutes of stopping infusion, whereas migraineurs experience a more severe initial headache that persists at a moderate level for several hours before developing into a full-scale migraine headache (27). NO appears to produce vasodilation at least in part through the evoked release of CGRP from primary afferent neurons that innervate the intracranial blood vessels (28).

Migraine and CGRP

Several lines of evidence indicate a prominent role for CGRP, a potent vasodilator, in the pathogenesis of migraine. Administration of CGRP to humans can produce migraine headache (2933). In non-migraineurs, intravenous (i.v.) infusion of CGRP causes a feeling of fullness in the head, but headache has not been reported. In contrast, i.v. CGRP infusion to migraineurs causes immediate headache and induces migraine-like disorders or migraine without aura (33). During migraine attacks, the release of CGRP into the cranial circulation is increased (34, 35). A direct relationship between CGRP and migraine has been demonstrated with nitroglycerin-induced migraine, in which plasma CGRP concentration significantly increased during the migraine attack, and returned to baseline after cessation of migraine. Additionally, the magnitude of the CGRP increase was related to the severity of the migraine attack (24). Furthermore, the critical role of CGRP in migraine has been confirmed by the effective use of the CGRP antagonist, BIBN 4096, to treat migraine (36). BIBN 4096 blocks trigeminal-induced facial vascular dilation in the marmoset (37) and CGRP-induced dilation of both human and bovine cerebral vessels (38). Similarly, triptans, 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists, can block meningeal vascular dilation (32), a response that involves CGRP (32) and NO (39). Different studies have shown that trigeminal ganglion neurons containing CGRP co-localize with both 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors (4042), and it is likely 5-HT1B/1D agonists can produce antimigraine effects, in part through inhibition of CGRP release from trigeminal primary afferent neurons (4345). It is also possible that CGRP contributes to neurogenic inflammation by potentiating the release of inflammatory agents such as histamine, serotonin, bradykinin and prostaglandins into the perivascular space (4649). One prominent theory of migraine holds that vasodilation of the intracranial vasculature combined with neurogenic inflammation in the perivascular space leads to activation of the trigeminal primary afferent neurons responsible for producing migraine headache pain (5053).

Migraine and cutaneous allodynia

Several studies have demonstrated increased excitability of the nociceptive pathway in migraine sufferers, both during and between migraine episodes (5458). Observations from both human and animal studies have demonstrated a sequence of events that occur during a migraine attack, leading from peripheral sensitization of primary afferent neurons to central sensitization of neurons in the nociceptive pathway (50, 58). Humans undergoing a migraine attack can develop an area of cutaneous allodynia that spreads over time (5459). Initially, the area of hypersensitivity is restricted to the region of referred pain ipsilateral to the headache. Throughout the course of the migraine, the area of allodynia can spread to include large regions of the head and face, and can also include other regions of the body. These results are consistent with recent preclinical studies that examined neuronal discharges following inflammation of the dura. Following application of a mixture of inflammatory mediators, the primary afferent neurons that innervate the dura become sensitized and respond to previously insensitive mechanical stimulation (60). Response properties of second-order neurons in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis following craniovascular stimulation have also been examined following dural inflammation (6163). Neurons that receive input from the middle meningeal artery, superior sagittal sinus and dura typically receive convergent input from the skin (61, 64, 65). Following dural inflammation, these neurons become sensitized to mechanical stimulation of the dura and increase their responses to thermal and mechanical stimulation of the facial region (61, 63). After 2–4 h, these enhanced cutaneous responses no longer require primary afferent input from the dura, and can therefore be considered signs of central sensitization. Although this model can explain the basis for headache and referred pain from trigeminal regions, it does not account for the extracranial hypersensitivity associated with migraine. The mechanisms by which extracranial and contralateral sensitivity occur are currently unknown.

Sustained exposure to morphine induces tactile and thermal hypersensitivity

Numerous studies in humans report that opioids can elicit abnormal pain (i.e. hyperalgesia), which includes allodynia and hyperalgesia, and typically the abnormal pain differs in location and quality from the original complaint (66, 67). Thermal hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia can also be demonstrated in animal model by repeated systemic or spinal injection of opioids (6871). Furthermore, many studies have reported that the thermal hyperalgesia, induced by repeated opioid administration, persists even after termination of drug administration, suggesting that sustained opioid can elicit long-lasting neuroadaptive changes (68, 72). One of the hypotheses for sustained opioid-induced hypersensitivity is that these changes in sensory thresholds result from mini-withdrawals from opioid administration, analogous to the explanation of rebound headache for MOH (73). Although this may be the case for studies with repeated injections of opiates, other studies have used continuous infusion of opiate by pellets or osmotic minipumps in order to provide stable blood levels, thus mitigating concerns of a contribution of withdrawal. An additional possibility is that sustained exposure to opiates can lead to the activation of pronociceptive circuits (72, 74, 75).

Multiple studies have demonstrated that sustained exposure to morphine over a period of days produces a decrease in evoked sensory thresholds in rodents (76, 77). The hypersensitivity observed during and following sustained morphine may engage mechanisms analogous to those that can elicit cutaneous allodynia observed during migraine in humans. Studies in our laboratory have shown that the mechanical allodynia following sustained exposure to subcutaneous morphine delivered by osmotic minipump is not localized to the rat hind paw. Animals receiving sustained morphine show hypersensitivity to touch in the facial region, suggesting the possibility of neuroadaptive changes in the trigeminal system as well as in afferents innervating other parts of the body. Sensory thresholds were determined using von Frey filaments applied to the infraorbital region of the face across 7 days of subcutaneous morphine (osmotic minipumps) (manuscript in preparation). The results of this study showed a similar time course to previous studies with the hindpaw, with sustained morphine producing facial tactile hypersensitivity (i.e. ‘allodynia’) beginning approximately on day 4 of exposure.

The mechanisms responsible for the tactile and thermal hypersensitivity observed following sustained morphine exposure are unknown. However, it is likely that the hypersensitivity requires activation of opioid receptors. Previous studies have evaluated the contribution of non-opioid activities of active metabolites such as M3G (7882, 8790). Such molecules are unlikely to be responsible for opiate-induced hyperalgesia, as this phenomenon has been reported in humans for many structurally diverse opioids including remifentanil, fentanyl, sufentanil, heroin and methadone, and most of these compounds have been shown to produce hyperalgesia in preclinical studies as well (69, 8387). Data from our laboratory have also shown that agonists for δ opioid receptors including peptidic (i.e. [D-Ala2, Glu4]deltorphin) and non-peptidic (i.e. SNC80) molecules also produce hyperalgesia (77).

Several independent observations have consistently shown that prolonged exposure to morphine results in up-regulation of the pronociceptive neurotransmitter CGRP in the peripheral nervous system (11, 12, 8890). We have also consistently demonstrated that prolonged morphine exposure results in enhanced capsaicin-evoked release of CGRP from primary afferent terminals in the spinal dorsal horn, suggestive of increased nociceptive transmission (11). More recently, we found that similar changes occur in the trigeminal nociceptive system as well (De Felice and Porreca, unpublished observations). Notably, subcutaneous morphine infusion significantly increased the number of trigeminal ganglion cells that expressed CGRP and/or neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS). Using flurogold as a retrograde marker, we found that the up-regulation of cells expressing CGRP and nNOS was particularly increased in cells specifically projecting to the dura. These changes in expression appeared to be of functional significance since, like our results within the spinal cord, morphine exposure increased the capsaicin-evoked release of CGRP in sections of the nucleus caudalis, as well as in dural preparations (i.e. the ‘cranial cup’), indicating enhanced release from both central and peripheral terminals of the trigeminal ganglion fibres (De Felice and Porreca, unpublished observations). Critically, CGRP and nNOS expression was still elevated 14 days after termination of morphine infusion. At that time point, morphine-induced behavioural hypersensitivity had resolved. However, in rats previously exposed to morphine as described here (i.e. for a 7-day period), but not in animals that had received saline, exposure to a NO donor or exposure to non-nociceptive environmental stress 14 days later evoked hyperalgesia. These observations suggest that prolonged exposure to morphine results in long-lasting neuroadaptive changes that promote a state of increased susceptibility to stimuli that may promote activation of the nociceptive trigeminal system. Under these conditions, putative sub-nociceptive stimuli may convert to nociception. These observations may have implications for clinically relevant conditions such as MOH that occur with prolonged morphine use, possibly by increasing the likelihood of migraine attack from normally ineffective triggers.

Conclusions

Although the effects of repeated opiate use for headache are unknown, it is possible that opiate use may contribute to increased frequency and occurrence of such headaches. Preclinically, it is clear that sustained morphine modulates the central and peripheral neural systems that are likely to underlie aspects of migraine headache pain. Our recent studies, summarized above, show that neural adaptations that occur following sustained morphine are seen in the trigeminal system and that these adaptations are pronociceptive and persistent. Moreover, they are especially prominent in fibres that project to the dura. Furthermore, we found that a period of exposure to opiates (over days) can result in increased responsiveness to stimuli known to trigger migraine attacks in humans (i.e. NO donors, stress). These findings suggest that such persistent and pronociceptive neural adaptations may contribute to opiate-induced MOH by (i) increasing the responsiveness of the nociceptive system to previously sub-threshold ‘triggering’ stimuli, as well as (ii) increasing the transmission of the pain signal at the level of the medullary dorsal horn. These processes may contribute to increase the likelihood and perhaps the severity of headache, and may reflect a neural basis for the development of opiate-induced MOH.

References

  • 1.Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The international classification of headache disorders. 2nd edn. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(Suppl 1):9–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2003.00824.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kudrow L. Paradoxical effects of frequent analgesic use. Adv Neurol. 1982;33:335–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Limmroth V, Katsarava Z. Medication overuse headache. Curr Opin Neurol. 2004;17:301–6. doi: 10.1097/00019052-200406000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mathew NT, Stubits E, Nigam MP. Transformation of episodic migraine into daily headache: analysis of factors. Headache. 1982;22:66–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1982.hed2202066.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Colas R, Munoz P, Temprano R, Gomez C, Pascual J. Chronic daily headache with analgesic overuse: epidemiology and impact on quality of life. Neurology. 2004;62:1338–42. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000120545.45443.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Diener HC, Dahlof CGH. Headache associated with chronic use of substances. In: Olesen J, Tfelt-Hansen P, Welch KM, editors. The headaches. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1999. pp. 871–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zwart JA, Dyb G, Hagen K, Svebak S, Holmen J. Analgesic use: a predictor of chronic pain and medication overuse headache: the Head-HUNT Study. Neurology. 2003;61:160–4. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000069924.69078.8d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zwart JA, Dyb G, Hagen K, Svebak S, Stovner LJ, Holmen J. Analgesic overuse among subjects with headache, neck, and low-back pain. Neurology. 2004;62:1540–4. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000123262.96132.fc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Limmroth V, Katsarava Z, Fritsche G, Przywara S, Diener HC. Features of medication overuse headache following overuse of different acute headache drugs. Neurology. 2002;59:1011–14. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.7.1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Katsarava Z, Schneeweiss S, Kurth T, Kroener U, Fritsche G, Eikermann A, et al. Incidence and predictors for chronicity of headache in patients with episodic migraine. Neurology. 2004;62:788–90. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000113747.18760.d2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gardell LR, Wang R, Burgess SE, Ossipov MH, Vanderah TW, Malan TP, Jr, et al. Sustained morphine exposure induces a spinal dynorphin-dependent enhancement of excitatory transmitter release from primary afferent fibers. J Neurosci. 2002;22:6747–55. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-15-06747.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Menard DP, van Rossum D, Kar S, Jolicoeur FB, Jhamandas K, Quirion R. Tolerance to the antinociceptive properties of morphine in the rat spinal cord: alteration of calcitonin gene-related peptide-like immunostaining and receptor binding sites. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;273:887–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ossipov MH, Lai J, Vanderah TW, Porreca F. Induction of pain facilitation by sustained opioid exposure: relationship to opioid antinociceptive tolerance. Life Sci. 2003;73:783–800. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(03)00410-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vanderah TW, Ossipov MH, Lai J, Malan TP, Jr, Porreca F. Mechanisms of opioid-induced pain and antinociceptive tolerance: descending facilitation and spinal dynorphin. Pain. 2001;92:5–9. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00311-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vanderah TW, Suenaga NM, Ossipov MH, Malan TP, Jr, Lai J, Porreca F. Tonic descending facilitation from the rostral ventromedial medulla mediates opioid-induced abnormal pain and antinociceptive tolerance. J Neurosci. 2001;21:279–86. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-01-00279.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xie JY, Herman DS, Stiller CO, Gardell LR, Ossipov MH, Lai J, et al. Cholecystokinin in the rostral ventromedial medulla mediates opioid-induced hyperalgesia and anti-nociceptive tolerance. J Neurosci. 2005;25:409–16. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4054-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sessle BJ. The neurobiology of facial and dental pain: present knowledge, future directions. J Dent Res. 1987;66:962–81. doi: 10.1177/00220345870660052201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schoonman GG, van der Grond J, Kortmann C, van der Geest RJ, Terwindt GM, Ferrari MD. Migraine headache is not associated with cerebral or meningeal vasodilatation—a 3T magnetic resonance angiography study. Brain. 2008;131:2192–200. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dubner R, Bennett GJ. Spinal and trigeminal mechanisms of nociception. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1983;6:381–418. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.06.030183.002121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Goadsby PJ. Pathophysiology of migraine: a disease of the brain. In: Goadsby PJ, Silberstein SD, editors. Headache. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 1997. pp. 5–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Coffey RJ, Rhoton AL. Pain-sensitive cranial structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ray BS, Wolff JG. Experimental studies on headache pain sensitive structures of the head and their significance in headache. Arch Surg. 1940;41:813–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Iversen HK, Olesen J. Headache induced by a nitric oxide donor (nitroglycerin) responds to sumatriptan. A human model for development of migraine drugs. Cephalalgia. 1996;16:412–18. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1996.1606412.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Juhasz G, Zsombok T, Modos EA, Olajos S, Jakab B, Nemeth J, et al. NO-induced migraine attack: strong increase in plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) concentration and negative correlation with platelet serotonin release. Pain. 2003;106:461–70. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Olesen J, Iversen HK, Thomsen LL. Nitric oxide super-sensitivity: a possible molecular mechanism of migraine pain. Neuroreport. 1993;4:1027–30. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199308000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Olesen J, Thomsen LL, Iversen H. Nitric oxide is a key molecule in migraine and other vascular headaches. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1994;15:149–53. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(94)90075-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Iversen HK, Olesen J, Tfelt-Hansen P. Intravenous nitro-glycerin as an experimental model of vascular headache. Basic characteristics. Pain. 1989;38:17–24. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90067-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Strecker T, Dux M, Messlinger K. Nitric oxide releases calcitonin-gene-related peptide from rat dura mater encephali promoting increases in meningeal blood flow. J Vasc Res. 2002;39:489–96. doi: 10.1159/000067206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Edwards RM, Stack EJ, Trizna W. Calcitonin gene-related peptide stimulates adenylate cyclase and relaxes intracerebral arterioles. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1991;257:1020–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Goadsby PJ. Inhibition of calcitonin gene-related peptide by h-CGRP(8–37) antagonizes the cerebral dilator response from nasociliary nerve stimulation in the cat. Neurosci Lett. 1993;151:13–6. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(93)90033-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Messlinger K, Hanesch U, Kurosawa M, Pawlak M, Schmidt RF. Calcitonin gene related peptide released from dural nerve fibers mediates increase of meningeal blood flow in the rat. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1995;73:1020–4. doi: 10.1139/y95-143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Williamson DJ, Hargreaves RJ, Hill RG, Shepheard SL. Sumatriptan inhibits neurogenic vasodilation of dural blood vessels in the anaesthetized rat—intravital microscope studies. Cephalalgia. 1997;17:525–31. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1997.1704525.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lassen LH, Haderslev PA, Jacobsen VB, Iversen HK, Sperling B, Olesen J. CGRP may play a causative role in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:54–61. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2002.00310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L, Ekman R. Vasoactive peptide release in the extracerebral circulation of humans during migraine headache. Ann Neurol. 1990;28:183–7. doi: 10.1002/ana.410280213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sarchielli P, Alberti A, Codini M, Floridi A, Gallai V. Nitric oxide metabolites, prostaglandins and trigeminal vasoactive peptides in internal jugular vein blood during spontaneous migraine attacks. Cephalalgia. 2000;20:907–18. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00146.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Olesen J, Diener HC, Husstedt IW, Goadsby PJ, Hall D, Meier U, et al. Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the acute treatment of migraine. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1104–10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Doods H, Hallermayer G, Wu D, Entzeroth M, Rudolf K, Engel W, et al. Pharmacological profile of BIBN4096BS, the first selective small molecule CGRP antagonist. Br J Pharmacol. 2000;129:420–3. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Moreno MJ, Abounader R, Hebert E, Doods H, Hamel E. Efficacy of the non-peptide CGRP receptor antagonist BIBN4096BS in blocking CGRP-induced dilations in human and bovine cerebral arteries: potential implications in acute migraine treatment. Neuropharmacology. 2002;42:568–76. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(02)00008-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Akerman S, Williamson DJ, Kaube H, Goadsby PJ. Nitric oxide synthase inhibitors can antagonize neurogenic and calcitonin gene-related peptide induced dilation of dural meningeal vessels. Br J Pharmacol. 2002;137:62–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bonaventure P, Voorn P, Luyten WH, Leysen JE. 5HT1B and 5HT1D receptor mRNA differential co-localization with peptide mRNA in the guinea pig trigeminal ganglion. Neuroreport. 1998;9:641–5. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199803090-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hou M, Kanje M, Longmore J, Tajti J, Uddman R, Edvinsson L. 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) receptors in the human trigeminal ganglion: co-localization with calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P and nitric oxide synthase. Brain Res. 2001;909:112–20. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)02645-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ma QP, Hill R, Sirinathsinghji D. Colocalization of CGRP with 5-HT1B/1D receptors and substance P in trigeminal ganglion neurons in rats. Eur J Neurosci. 2001;13:2099–104. doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01586.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Durham PL, Russo AF. Regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide secretion by a serotonergic antimigraine drug. J Neurosci. 1999;19:3423–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-09-03423.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Eltorp CT, Jansen-Olesen I, Hansen AJ. Release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) from guinea pig dura mater in vitro is inhibited by sumatriptan but unaffected by nitric oxide. Cephalalgia. 2000;20:838–44. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00131.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Katsarava Z, Fritsche G, Muessig M, Diener HC, Limmroth V. Clinical features of withdrawal headache following overuse of triptans and other headache drugs. Neurology. 2001;57:1694–8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.9.1694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ahluwalia A, Perretti M. Calcitonin gene-related peptides modulate the acute inflammatory response induced by interleukin-1 in the mouse. Eur J Pharmacol. 1994;264:407–15. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(94)00503-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Brain SD, Williams TJ. Inflammatory oedema induced by synergism between calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and mediators of increased vascular permeability. Br J Pharmacol. 1985;86:855–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1985.tb11107.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Buckley TL, Brain SD, Rampart M, Williams TJ. Time-dependent synergistic interactions between the vasodilator neuropeptide, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and mediators of inflammation. Br J Pharmacol. 1991;103:1515–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1991.tb09819.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gamse R, Posch M, Saria A, Jancso G. Several mediators appear to interact in neurogenic inflammation. Acta Physiol Hung. 1987;69:343–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Burstein R. Deconstructing migraine headache into peripheral and central sensitization. Pain. 2001;89:107–10. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00478-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L. The trigeminovascular system and migraine: studies characterizing cerebrovascular and neuropeptide changes seen in humans and cats. Ann Neurol. 1993;33:48–56. doi: 10.1002/ana.410330109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Moskowitz MA, Macfarlane R. Neurovascular and molecular mechanisms in migraine headaches. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev. 1993;5:159–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Spierings EL. Migraine mechanism and management. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2003;36:1063–78. doi: 10.1016/s0030-6665(03)00129-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Burstein R, Yarnitsky D, Goor-Aryeh I, Ransil BJ, Bajwa ZH. An association between migraine and cutaneous allodynia. Ann Neurol. 2000;47:614–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.de Tommaso M, Valeriani M, Guido M, Libro G, Specchio LM, Tonali P, et al. Abnormal brain processing of cutaneous pain in patients with chronic migraine. Pain. 2003;101:25–32. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00299-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Katsarava Z, Lehnerdt G, Duda B, Ellrich J, Diener HC, Kaube H. Sensitization of trigeminal nociception specific for migraine but not pain of sinusitis. Neurology. 2002;59:1450–3. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.9.1450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kaube H, Katsarava Z, Przywara S, Drepper J, Ellrich J, Diener HC. Acute migraine headache: possible sensitization of neurons in the spinal trigeminal nucleus? Neurology. 2002;58:1234–8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.8.1234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Weissman-Fogel I, Sprecher E, Granovsky Y, Yarnitsky D. Repeated noxious stimulation of the skin enhances cutaneous pain perception of migraine patients in-between attacks: clinical evidence for continuous sub-threshold increase in membrane excitability of central trigeminovascular neurons. Pain. 2003;104:693–700. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00159-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Burstein R, Cutrer MF, Yarnitsky D. The development of cutaneous allodynia during a migraine attack clinical evidence for the sequential recruitment of spinal and supraspinal nociceptive neurons in migraine. Brain. 2000;123:1703–9. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.8.1703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Strassman AM, Raymond SA, Burstein R. Sensitization of meningeal sensory neurons and the origin of headaches. Nature. 1996;384:560–4. doi: 10.1038/384560a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Burstein R, Yamamura H, Malick A, Strassman AM. Chemical stimulation of the intracranial dura induces enhanced responses to facial stimulation in brain stem trigeminal neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1998;79:964–82. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ebersberger A, Ringkamp M, Reeh PW, Handwerker HO. Recordings from brain stem neurons responding to chemical stimulation of the subarachnoid space. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77:3122–33. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.6.3122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Yamamura H, Malick A, Chamberlin NL, Burstein R. Cardiovascular and neuronal responses to head stimulation reflect central sensitization and cutaneous allodynia in a rat model of migraine. J Neurophysiol. 1999;81:479–93. doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.2.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Davis KD, Dostrovsky JO. Activation of trigeminal brainstem nociceptive neurons by dural artery stimulation. Pain. 1986;25:395–401. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90244-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Davis KD, Dostrovsky JO. Responses of feline trigeminal spinal tract nucleus neurons to stimulation of the middle meningeal artery and sagittal sinus. J Neurophysiol. 1988;59:648–66. doi: 10.1152/jn.1988.59.2.648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ali NM. Hyperalgesic response in a patient receiving high concentrations of spinal morphine. Anesthesiology. 1986;65:449. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198610000-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Arner S, Meyerson BA. Lack of analgesic effect of opioids on neuropathic and idiopathic forms of pain. Pain. 1988;33:11–23. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90198-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Celerier E, Rivat C, Jun Y, Laulin JP, Larcher A, Reynier P, et al. Long-lasting hyperalgesia induced by fentanyl in rats: preventive effect of ketamine. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:465–72. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200002000-00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Célèrier E, Laulin JP, Corcuff JB, Le Moal M, Simonnet G. Progressive enhancement of delayed hyperalgesia induced by repeated heroin administration: a sensitization process. J Neurosci. 2001;21:4074–80. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-11-04074.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Laulin JP, Maurette P, Corcuff JB, Rivat C, Chauvin M, Simonnet G. The role of ketamine in preventing fentanyl-induced hyperalgesia and subsequent acute morphine tolerance. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:1263–9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200205000-00040. table. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Mao J, Price DD, Mayer DJ. Thermal hyperalgesia in association with the development of morphine tolerance in rats: roles of excitatory amino acid receptors and protein kinase C. J Neurosci. 1994;14:2301–12. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-04-02301.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Laulin JP, Larcher A, Célèrier E, Le Moal M, Simonnet G. Long-lasting increased pain sensitivity in rat following exposure to heroin for the first time. Eur J Neurosci. 1998;10:782–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00083.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gutstein HB. The effects of pain on opioid tolerance: how do we resolve the controversy? Pharmacol Rev. 1996;48:403–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Colpaert FC. System theory of pain and of opiate analgesia: no tolerance to opiates. Pharmacol Rev. 1996;48:355–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Laulin JP, Célèrier E, Larcher A, Le Moal M, Simonnet G. Opiate tolerance to daily heroin administration: an apparent phenomenon associated with enhanced pain sensitivity. Neuroscience. 1999;89:631–6. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00652-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Mao J, Sung B, Ji RR, Lim G. Chronic morphine induces downregulation of spinal glutamate transporters: implications in morphine tolerance and abnormal pain sensitivity. J Neurosci. 2002;22:8312–23. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-18-08312.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Vanderah TW, Gardell LR, Burgess SE, Ibrahim M, Dogrul A, Zhong CM, et al. Dynorphin promotes abnormal pain and spinal opioid antinociceptive tolerance. J Neurosci. 2000;20:7074–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-18-07074.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Christensen CB, Jorgensen LN. Morphine-6-glucuronide has high affinity for the opioid receptor. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1987;60:75–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1987.tb01724.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Faura CC, Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Systematic review of factors affecting the ratios of morphine and its major metabolites. Pain. 1998;74:43–53. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00142-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Woolf CJ. Intrathecal high dose morphine produces hyperalgesia in the rat. Brain Res. 1981;209:491–5. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90176-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yaksh TL, Harty GJ, Onofrio BM. High dose of spinal morphine produce a nonopiate receptor-mediated hyperesthesia: clinical and theoretic implications. Anesthesiology. 1986;64:590–7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198605000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Yaksh TL, Harty GJ. Pharmacology of the allodynia in rats evoked by high dose intrathecal morphine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988;244:501–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bulka A, Plesan A, Xu XJ, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z. Reduced tolerance to the anti-hyperalgesic effect of methadone in comparison to morphine in a rat model of mononeuropathy. Pain. 2002;95:103–9. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00382-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Compton P, Charuvastra VC, Ling W. Pain intolerance in opioid-maintained former opiate addicts: effect of long-acting maintenance agent. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001;63:139–46. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(00)00200-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Guignard B, Bossard AE, Coste C, Sessler DI, Lebrault C, Alfonsi P, et al. Acute opioid tolerance: intraoperative remifentanil increases postoperative pain and morphine requirement. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:409–17. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200008000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Larcher A, Laulin JP, Célèrier E, Le Moal M, Simonnet G. Acute tolerance associated with a single opiate administration: involvement of N-methyl-D-aspartate-dependent pain facilitatory systems. Neuroscience. 1998;84:583–9. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00556-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Sjogren P, Jensen NH, Jensen TS. Disappearance of morphine-induced hyperalgesia after discontinuing or substituting morphine with other opioid agonists. Pain. 1994;59:313–16. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90084-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Belanger S, Ma W, Chabot JG, Quirion R. Expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P and protein kinase C in cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons following chronic exposure to mu, delta and kappa opiates. Neuroscience. 2002;115:441–53. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00452-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ma W, Zheng WH, Kar S, Quirion R. Morphine treatment induced calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P increases in cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons. Neuroscience. 2000;99:529–39. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00226-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Powell KJ, Ma W, Sutak M, Doods H, Quirion R, Jhamandas K. Blockade and reversal of spinal morphine tolerance by peptide and non-peptide calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists. Br J Pharmacol. 2000;131:875–84. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES