Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2017 Nov 17;12(11):e0187980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187980

Heterozygous deletion of both sclerostin (Sost) and connexin43 (Gja1) genes in mice is not sufficient to impair cortical bone modeling

Susan K Grimston 1,#, Francesca Fontana 1,*,#, Marcus Watkins 1, Roberto Civitelli 1
Editor: Xing-Ming Shi2
PMCID: PMC5693294  PMID: 29149200

Abstract

Connexin43 (Cx43) is the main gap junction protein expressed in bone forming cells, where it modulates peak bone mass acquisition and cortical modeling. Genetic ablation of the Cx43 gene (Gja1) results in cortical expansion with accentuated periosteal bone formation associated with decreased expression of the Wnt inhibitor sclerostin. To determine whether sclerostin (Sost) down-regulation might contribute to periosteal expansion in Gja1 deficient bones, we took a gene interaction approach and crossed mice harboring germline null alleles for Gja1 or Sost to generate single Gja1+/–and Sost+/–and double Gja1+/–;Sost+/–heterozygous mice. In vivo μCT analysis of cortical bone at age 1 and 3 months confirmed increased thickness in Sost–/–mice, but revealed no cortical abnormalities in single Gja1+/–or Sost+/–mice. Double heterozygous Gja1+/–Sost+/–also showed no differences in mineral density, cortical thickness, width or geometry relative to wild type control mice. Likewise, 3-point bending measurement of bone strength revealed no significant differences between double Gja1+/–;Sost+/–or single heterozygous and wild type mice. Although these data do not exclude a contribution of reduced sclerostin in the cortical expansion seen in Gja1 deficient bones, they are not consistent with a strong genetic interaction between Sost and Gja1 dictating cortical modeling.

Introduction

Bone remodeling and homeostasis depend on the concerted actions of bone forming and resorbing cells, whose function is orchestrated by endocrine and paracrine factors, and by direct cell-cell interactions. Gap junctions are intercellular channels formed by the pairing of two hemichannels, or connexons, on the membrane of opposing cells, allowing direct transfer of small cytoplasmic molecules. Connexin 43 (Cx43) is the main gap junction protein expressed in bone, where it directs peak bone mass acquisition, cortical modeling, and mechano-responsiveness [13]. Underscoring its importance for bone development and homeostasis, spontaneous mutations of GJA1 (Cx43 gene) cause rare skeletal disorders, oculodentodigital dysplasia (ODDD) and recessive craniometaphyseal dysplasia [1, 4]. In mice, conditional deletion of Gja1 in osteogenic cells results in age-dependent accentuation of periosteal expansion, leading to diaphyseal widening and cortical thinning. This cortical phenotype is the result of enhanced periosteal bone formation and endocortical bone resorption [5, 6]. At the cellular level, Cx43 participates in a number of homeostatic processes, and can regulate signaling through different mechanisms, such as direct cell-cell transfer of second messengers or small metabolites, hemichannel-mediated release of paracrine factors, or by providing a scaffold for intracellular signaling components through its cytoplasmic domain [2, 7].

Interestingly, mice with a germline ablation of the sclerostin gene (Sost–/–), a potent Wnt inhibitor, also have expanded cortices [8]; and we and others have shown that mice with conditional deletion of Gja1 in osteogenic lineage cells have decreased Sost expression in bone [9, 10]. Gja1deficient mice display increased sensitivity to mechanical loading, with enhanced periosteal bone formation responses to tibial compression or axial loading of the ulna [10]. On the other hand, cortical bone loss after skeletal unloading is significantly reduced in conditional Gja1 deficient mice [11]. Notably, Sost–/–mice are also hyper-responsive to anabolic loading regimens in terms of periosteal bone formation, while they are partially protected from bone loss following mechanical unloading [12]. Finally, Sost expression decreases upon mechanical unloading and decreases with loading [1315].

Considering the similar age-related periosteal expansion in Gja1 and Sost deficient mice, the modulatory action of Cx43 and sclerostin on cortical bone response to loading and unloading, and the decreased Sost expression in Gja1 deficient bones [5, 10], we hypothesized that decreased sclerostin production by Cx43-deficient osteocytes might contribute to the accentuated bone formation of Gja1 deficient mice. Here, we tested this hypothesis using a gene interaction approach, and studied mice with combined Sost and Gja1 haploinsufficiency. Since loss of Cx43 in osteoblasts and osteocytes reduces sclerostin expression [10], we posited that sclerostin production would be further reduced in compound heterozygous mice, thus leading to enhanced Wnt activation and cortical expansion, phenocopying conditional Gja1 ablation. Our results show that loss of a single Sost allele does not alter cortical bone geometry or strength, consistent with previously reported normal total-body bone density in these mice [8]. More to the point, results also show that combined Sost and Gja1 haploinsufficiency has no consistent effect on cortical bone architecture or strength, suggesting that the action of Cx43 on cortical bone modeling is mostly independent of reduced Sost expression.

Materials and methods

Animals

To generate mice carrying one null allele of Gja1 and Sost (Gja1–/+;Sost–/+) we crossed single heterozygous Gja1–/+ [16] and Sost–/+ [8] mice (mixed background). Wild type littermates from the same crosses, and Sost knockout (Sost–/–) mice obtained by crossing male and female Sost–/+ mice were used as controls. All the genotype groups were obtained at the expected Mendelian frequencies, and did not exhibit overt skeletal abnormalities at birth. Genotyping was performed by PCR on genomic DNA extracted from mouse tails using the HotSHOT method, as previously described [5, 9]. Primers to detect wild type and null Gja1 and Sost alleles were as previously described [8, 17]. Mice were fed an ad libitum regular chow (PicoLab Rodent Diet 20, 5053; TestDiet/LabDiet, St. Louis, MO) and housed in cages containing 2–5 animals each, in a room maintained at constant 25°C on a 12-hour light/dark cycle. Mice were euthanized by carbon dioxide inhalation as per Animal Studies Committee recommended protocol. All procedures were approved by the Animal Studies Committee of Washington University (protocol number: 20140279).

Gene expression analysis

Tibiae were cleaned of all connective tissue, then the proximal epiphysis was cut off, and the bone marrow was removed by centrifugation (10,000 rpm for 10 sec). Tibiae were then flash frozen in liquid nitrogen for storage at −80°C. Bones were mechanically dissociated in Trizol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) with a Bullet Blender Storm (Midwest Scientific, St Louis, MA, USA) for 2–4 cycles of 5 minutes. RNA was extracted with chloroform then the aqueous phase was purified with RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen Valencia, CA, USA) columns according to the manufacturer's directions, including DNAse treatment (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Reverse transcription using High capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was performed on 0.5μg of RNA, and 10ng of template cDNA were used for qPCR with SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Tli RNase H Plus) (Takara Bio, Shiga Prefecture, Japan) and target-specific primers (sequences in supplementary information), and analyzed with a QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Target gene expression was normalized to 18S using the ΔΔCT method.

Bone microstructure

For in vivo analysis of bone microstructure and mineralization, animals were subjected to in vivo scanning using μCT (VIVA μCT40, Scanco Medical, AG, Switzerland) using previously described parameters [11]. Microstructural analysis of cortical bone was also as described [3, 11].

Bone histology and histomorphometric analysis

Bone samples were prepared as previously described [3]. Quantitative histomorphometry was performed using a commercial software (OSTEO II, Bioquant, Nashville, TN, USA), and standard parameters of bone remodeling were determined according to the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research guidelines.

Bone biomechanics

For assessment of bone strength, dissected femurs were tested in three-point bending to failure or fracture using methods described previously [18]. Briefly, specimens were stabilized over two supports placed 7 mm apart in an Instron 8841 apparatus (Instron, Norwood, MA, USA). A loading force was applied in the anteroposterior direction midway between the two supports by a displacement ramp at a rate of0.03 mm/s. Force and displacement data were collected at100 Hz (Labview 5.0, National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA), and test curves were analyzed as previously described [11, 19].

Statistics

Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Group means were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc analysis for multiple group comparisons with the level of significance set at p<0.05. Unless otherwise specified, data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Preliminary analyses were conducted to confirm that gender did not account for variability in the cortical bone data set, and groups were stratified by gender for easier graphic and tabular representation.

Results

We first monitored growth of the different mutants. At 1 month of age, there was no difference in body weight across genotypes in males (Fig 1A); whereas Gja1–/+;Sost–/+ double heterozygous female mice had 20% lower body weight relative to the other genotypes (Fig 1B). However, this difference was no longer seen at 3 months of age, when body weight was the same across genotypes in both genders (Fig 1A and 1B). Tibia length increased with age, as expected, in all animals, with some variation across genotypes. At one month of age, the tibiae of Sost–/+ mice were significantly shorter than wild type controls in both male and females (about 10% and 8%, respectively); however, this difference was not seen at 3 months (Fig 1C and 1D). Consistent with the reduced body weight, at 1 month the tibiae of double Gja1-/+;Sost–/+ heterozygous female were about 16% shorter than wild type (Fig 1D). By 3 months of age, however, all inter-genotype differences were lost, suggesting that loss of one Sost allele, alone or in combination with loss of one Gja1 allele, does not induce consistent or permanent effects on mouse skeletal growth.

Fig 1. Normal growth in Gja1–/+;Sost–/+ compound heterozygous mice relative to control littermates.

Fig 1

(A) Body weight in 1 (open bars) vs. 3 months (solid) old male mice (n = 4–13 per group per time-point) and (B) 1 vs. 3 months old female mice (n = 3–13 per group per time-point); two-way ANOVA p<0.001 for age in both genders, genotype p = 0.016 in females, ns in males (C) tibial length measured by in-vivo CT at 1 vs. 3 months of age in males (n = 4–9 per group per time-point) and (D) in female mice (n = 3–7 per group per time-point); # Dunnett’s post-hoc test p<0.01 relative to WT at one month of age; two-way ANOVA p<0.001 for age in both genders, genotype p<0.01 in females, p = 0.055 in males.

In vivo μCT analysis revealed that at 1 and 3 months of age all cortical morphometric parameters were normal in single Gja1–/+ and Sost–/+ heterozygous null mice. Likewise, in Sost–/–mice we did not detect significant differences in marrow area relative to other genotypes at either one (Fig 2A) or three months (Fig 2B). Total cortical area was higher in Sost–/–mice at age 1 month (about 40%, p<0.001), but such difference was no longer present at 3 months of age (Fig 2D). As anticipated from previous reports [8], cortical thickness was higher in Sost–/–at both age 1 and 3 months (about 25%) (Fig 2E and 2F). Increased cortical thickness was observed in Sost–/–mice of both genders, while a significant expansion of cortical tissue area was seen only in males (Table 1). Intriguingly, cortical thickness in Gja1–/+;Sost–/+ mice was lower than in wild type mice, but this difference disappeared at 3 months of age (Fig 2E and 2F).

Fig 2. In vivo μCT analysis of cortical bone in Gja1–/+ and Sost–/+ mutant mice.

Fig 2

In vivo analysis of cortical bone at the mid-point of tibial diaphysis in 1 (left: A, C, E, G) and 3 month old mice (right: B, D, F, H). (A-B) marrow area; (C-D) Total area; (E-F) Cortical thickness; (G-H) representative images. **p<0.01 relative to WT in Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons in ANOVA; data from males and females (n = 6–14 per group). See Table 1 for gender-specific analyses (two-way ANOVA for gender ns).

Table 1. In vivo μCT analysis of tibial diaphysis at the mid-point.

Sex Age
(mo)
WT Gja1–/+ Sost–/+ Gja1–/+;
Sost–/+
Sost–/– P
(ANOVA)
Marrow area
(Mar. Ar.) mm2
M 1 Mean 0.0042800 0.0044400 0.0042380 0.0046000 0.0043400 0.699
SD 0.0002049 0.0004615 0.0004658 0.0004123 0.0006542
3 Mean 0.0053800 0.0054600 0.0051670 0.0059830 0.0048750 0.092
SD 0.0005263 0.0009555 0.0006185 0.0005845 0.0002062
F 1 Mean 0.0041710 0.0040500 0.0041170 0.0038800 0.0036000 0.312
SD 0.0003729 0.0002811 0.0005565 0.0004817 0.0005477
3 Mean 0.0045710 0.0043670 0.0050200 0.0047500 0.0048000 0.639
SD 0.0007868 0.0003830 0.0005718 0.0009182 0.0008485
Tissue Area
(Tt. Ar.) mm2
M 1 Mean 0.0075000 0.0075200 0.0070880 0.0074200 0.0095000** 0.003
SD 0.0004848 0.0008585 0.0007717 0.0007662 0.0015940
3 Mean 0.0053800 0.0054600 0.0051670 0.0059830 0.0048750 0.199
SD 0.0005263 0.0009555 0.0006185 0.0005845 0.0002062
F 1 Mean 0.0074140 0.0071670 0.0072670 0.0063400 0.0078250 0.070
SD 0.0008275 0.0005955 0.0003724 0.0006309 0.0012500
3 Mean 0.0106000 0.0097170 0.0112800 0.0108500 0.0121500 0.1259
SD 0.0012580 0.0012020 0.0011900 0.0011950 0.0010610
Cortical Thickness
(Ct. Th.) μm2
M
1 Mean 0.0964000 0.0920000 0.0845000 0.0776000 0.1458000** 0.001
SD 0.0135000 0.0204700 0.0199400 0.0225200 0.0266000
3 Mean 0.1842000 0.1786000 0.1983000 0.1888000 0.228000* 0.017
SD 0.0124200 0.0106900 0.0305200 0.0167500 0.0148100
F 1 Mean 0.0985700 0.1005000 0.0965000 0.058800** 0.1335000** <0.001
SD 0.0160800 0.0091160 0.0198900 0.0105200 0.0061370
3 Mean 0.1820000 0.1738000 0.1824000 0.1808000 0.2255000** <0.001
SD 0.0059720 0.0153300 0.0084440 0.0106800 0.0091920
Sample number M 1 N 5 5 8 5 5
3 N 5 5 9 6 4
F 1 N 7 6 6 5 4
3 N 7 6 5 6 2

Analysis of in vivo μCT, showing mean, standard deviation (SD) and number of subjects analyzed (N) for male (M) and female (F) mice aged 1 or 3 months. Analysis of variance (ANOVA: p value in the last column); followed by Dunnet’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons (*p<0.05 and **p<0.01 relative to WT).

To validate our model and determine how combined heterozygous loss of Gja1 and Sost affects expression of genes involved in osteoclastogenesis and bone formation we analyzed mRNA from cortical bone extracts of adult mice by RT-qPCR. As expected, Sost mRNA was almost undetectable in Sost–/–mice, and it was decreased, though not significantly, in Sost-/+ bones. Importantly, Sost mRNA was significantly reduced relative to WT controls in Gja1-/+; Sost-/+ mice (Fig 3A). Furthermore, we noted a small but significant increase in osteocalcin (Bglap) mRNA in Gja1-/+, Sost—+ and Gja1-/+; Sost-/+ mice relative to controls, By contrast, neither the osteoclast marker tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAP5b, Acp5) (Fig 3C), or the pro-osteoclastogenic factor receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL, Tnfsf11) (Fig 3D) were altered in any of the mutant mice.

Fig 3. Gene expression in cortical bones of Gja1–/+ and Sost–/+ mutant mice.

Fig 3

Abundance of mRNA for sclerostin (Sost) (A), osteocalcin (Bglap) (B), TRAP5b (Acp5) (C), and RANKL (Tnfsf11) (D) extracted from the tibial diaphysis and assessed by RT-qPCR. Average and standard deviation of biological triplicates normalized to WT. * p<0.05 and **p<0.01 relative to WT in Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons after ANOVA.

We had previously shown that conditional Gja1 ablation in osteogenic cells leads to increased periosteal formation and cortical thinning by enhancing endocortical bone resorption. To determine whether osteoclast number is altered in our mutant mice, we performed tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining and hystomorphometric analysis of paraffin embedded sections of tibiae. To capture an osteoclast-rich area, we analyzed the proximal metaphysis of 1 month-old tibiae. Consistent with lack of major structural abnormalities on cortical bone and unaltered whole-tissue gene expression, we found that 1-month old Gja1–/+;Sost–/+ mice had a normal number of TRAP-positive, multinucleated cells (Table 2). Osteoblast surface was increased in Sost–/+ but not in Sost–/–(or Gja1–/+) mice, and there were no differences among genotypes in osteoblast number (Table 2), suggesting the high osteoblast surface in Sost–/+ may reflect a random finding.

Table 2. Static cellular histomorphometric parameters in Gja1–/+ and Sost–/+ mutant mice.

WT Gja1–/+ Sost–/+ Gja1–/+;Sost–/+ Sost–/–
Oc.S/BS Mean 0.11840 0.15690 0.19230 0.10830 0.13410
SD 0.02887 0.02914 0.05067 0.04861 0.10150
N. Oc/BS Mean 5.22400 7.05600 3.29300 4.32800 3.60200
SD 0.38800 2.28700 0.96150 1.64500 1.04200
Ob. S/BS Mean 0.05057 0.06397 0.18290* 0.04302 0.08462
SD 0.01691 0.01888 0.07381 0.01480 0.03814
N. Ob/BS Mean 5.23700 5.31600 7.04900 5.73500 6.90400
SD 1.40800 2.36100 2.82700 0.88760 2.41700

Histomorphometry analysis on TRAP-stained sections from 1 month old male mice (n = 3-5/group).

*p<0.05 relative to WT controls by Dunnet’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons.

We then asked whether single or compound heterozygous deletion would affect bone strength, which is contributed to by material properties in addition to bone architecture. Consistent with the normal cortical parameters, the polar moment of inertia (pMOI), a geometric index of bone strength, was not different between each single or compound Gja1–/+;Sost–/+ mutants and wild type mice. A transient increase was noted in Sost–/–mice at age 1 month, although the difference was lost at 3 months (Fig 4A and 4B). Direct biomechanical testing of bone strength was performed by 3-point bending on tibiae from 3 month old mice. Consistent with the geometric data, bone strength (ultimate force, fracture force and stiffness) was not different between single Gja1–/+ and Sost–/+ heterozygous and wild type mice (Fig 4C and 4E). However, the compound Gja1–/+;Sost–/+ mutants exhibited a 20% higher ultimate force relative to wild-type controls, but no significant differences in fracture force or stiffness (Fig 4C and 4E). As expected from previous reports, all the 3 biomechanical parameters were significantly higher in Sost–/–mice (Fig 4C and 4E).

Fig 4. Biomechanical properties in Gja1–/+ and Sost–/+ mutant mice.

Fig 4

Polar moment of inertia (pMOI) at 1 (A) and 3 (B) months of age measured by μCT analysis of the tibia as in Fig 2 (n = 7–14 per group). Three-point bending biomechanical testing in femurs of 3 month old mice, reporting ultimate force (C), fracture force (D), and stiffness (E) (n = 6–12 per group). * p<0.05 and **p<0.01 relative to WT in Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons in ANOVA.

Discussion

This genetic interaction study demonstrates that combined haploinsufficiency of Gja1 and Sost does not recapitulate the cortical bone expansion that occurs with ablation of either gene, despite significant reduction in sclerostin expression. While not fully excluding participation of reduced sclerostin expression in the pathogenesis of periosteal expansion in Gja1 deficiency, these results indicate that other mechanisms are involved in Cx43 modulation of cortical bone modeling.

Previous work from our and other groups has shown that mice with conditional ablation of Gja1 in cells of the osteogenic lineage have decreased Sost expression [9, 10]. These mice also share similarities in the response to mechanical loading with Sost null mice; specifically, they show enhanced periosteal bone apposition in response to mechanical loading [9, 20]. We tested the hypothesis that reduced sclerostin production observed in Cx43 deficient bones might contribute to their accentuated periosteal expansion. We anticipated that combined loss of one allele of both Gja1 and Sost would lead to further reduction of sclerostin relative to each single heterozygous null mutant, resulting in cortical expansion. Contrary to such expectations, our results demonstrate that compound Gja1–/+;Sost–/+ mutants have a normal cortex at 3 months of age, despite reduced levels of sclerostin. The lower cortical thickness (and the tendentially lower pMOI) observed in these mutants at 1 month of age is apparently inconsistent with the higher ultimate force evident at 3 months of age; however, since the morphological features normalize by 3 months of age, the thinner cortices at 1 month may simply reflect a modest developmental delay. On the other hand, we observed the expected increased cortical thickness in Sost–/–mice at 1 and 3 months [8]. This is likely the result of reduced endocortical expansion and accentuated periosteal apposition, changes that are below the detection limit of histomorphometry. Therefore, while not excluding that sclerostin may participate in the cortical expansion of Cx43-deficient mice, our study demonstrates that ablation of a single Sost allele is not sufficient to cause the cortical phenotype in a Gja1 heterozygous null background.

Heterozygous loss of Gja1 in vivo causes detectable abnormalities of cardiac conductance [21]. In the skeleton, we previously reported that calvaria cells from Gja1–/+ mice have reduced Cx43 protein levels, decreased cell coupling, and reduced mineralization, thus exhibiting an in vitro hypomorph phenotype relative to Gja1 knockout [17]. Despite these in vitro abnormalities, here we confirm that heterozygous Gja1 loss does not result in an overt skeletal phenotype [22], implying that a single copy of Gja1 is sufficient for skeletal development and homeostasis, at least in normal homeostatic conditions. We have previously reported that conditional ablation of Gja1 in the osteogenic lineage induces cortical thinning and marrow area expansion through increased osteoclastogenesis. Indeed, blockade of osteoclast activity with bisphosphonates rescues cortical thinning [3]. Furthermore, Cx43-deficient osteogenic cells produce lower abundance of the bone resorption inhibitor, osteoprotegerin (Tnfrsf11b) [5], and higher levels of the bone resorption stimulator, RANKL (Tnfsf11) [6], resulting in enhanced osteoclast differentiation [5]. Here, we show that a single Gja1 allele in osteoblastic cells is sufficient to support normal osteoclast numbers in vivo and a normal cortical morphology. Intriguingly, we find increased Bgalp expression in single Gja1+/–, and compound Gja1+/–;Sost+/–mutants, as well as in Sost null bones, suggesting that both genes participate in the regulation of Bgalp. However, there is no synergistic effect in the compound mutants, further stressing lack of genetic interactions. Notably, these results are consistent with increased circulating levels of ostocalcin (Bgalp gene product) both in osteoblast-specific Gja1 ablated mice [5] and in Sost null mice [8]. However, since osteoblast number, total bone area and cortical thickness are unaltered in Gja1+/–and Gja1+/–;Sost+/–mice, the increased expression of a marker of osteoblast function in these Gja1 haploinsufficient mice may reflect only modest changes in osteoblast function, not sufficient to alter bone architecture, at least within 3 months of life. It is also worth noting that Cx43 is positively regulated by canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling [23], adding to the complexity in the cross-regulation between Sost and Gja1.

We show that loss of one Sost allele results in decreased sclerostin production, implying constitutively increased Wnt signaling and osteoblast activity. Yet, we see no structural or biomechanical abnormalities in heterozygous Sost+/–mice. Wnt signaling stimulation is followed by a number of compensatory effects and negative feedback loops, that eventually turn off the signal [24]. Studies on rodents [25] and non-human primates [26] have shown that while administration of neutralizing anti-sclerostin antibodies rapidly uncouples bone turnover favoring bone formation, the remodeling cycle eventually re-couples despite continuous treatment; this is associated with increased circulating levels of sclerostin and Dkk-1, another Wnt inhibitor. While complete loss of sclerostin might not be fully compensated, thus resulting in high bone mass in mice and humans, partial loss of sclerostin as it occurs in heterozygous Sost+/–mice might be overridden by homeostatic mechanisms, thus preventing the development of a skeletal phenotype.

Our data demonstrate that combined heterozygous deletion of Sost and Gja1 do not induce the cortical expansion we anticipated based upon our genetic interaction model. Therefore, while not excluding a role of sclerostin, our results demonstrate that the cortical bone modeling abnormalities present in mice with conditional ablation of Gja1 in bone forming cells is not mediated by decreased sclerostin abundance only.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Primer sequences.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Supporting data on mouse growth.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Supporting data on bone microstructure.

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Supporting data on gene expression.

(XLSX)

S5 Table. Supporting data on histomorphometry.

(XLSX)

S6 Table. Supporting data on biomechanics.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Musculoskeletal Histology, and Morphometry, and the Structure and Strength Cores of Washington University Musculoskeletal Research Center. We thank Yael Alippe and Dr. Gabriel Mbalaviele for protocols and discussion, and Kristann Magee for technical support.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by grants from National Institute of Health/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (www.niams.nih.gov) R01-AR041255 (RC), P30-AR057235 (Core Center for Musculoskeletal Biology and Medicine), and funds from the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation (RC). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Stains JP, Civitelli R. Connexins in the skeleton. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;50:31–9. Epub 2016/01/08. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.12.017 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4779380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stains JP, Watkins MP, Grimston SK, Hebert C, Civitelli R. Molecular mechanisms of osteoblast/osteocyte regulation by connexin43. Calcif Tissue Int. 2014;94(1):55–67. Epub 2013/06/12. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9742-6 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3815501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Watkins MP, Norris JY, Grimston SK, Zhang X, Phipps RJ, Ebetino FH, et al. Bisphosphonates improve trabecular bone mass and normalize cortical thickness in ovariectomized, osteoblast connexin43 deficient mice. Bone. 2012;51(4):787–94. Epub 2012/07/04. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.06.018 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3432742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kelly JJ, Simek J, Laird DW. Mechanisms linking connexin mutations to human diseases. Cell Tissue Res. 2015;360(3):701–21. Epub 2014/11/16. doi: 10.1007/s00441-014-2024-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Watkins M, Grimston SK, Norris JY, Guillotin B, Shaw A, Beniash E, et al. Osteoblast connexin43 modulates skeletal architecture by regulating both arms of bone remodeling. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22(8):1240–51. Epub 2011/02/25. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-07-0571 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3078079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bivi N, Condon KW, Allen MR, Farlow N, Passeri G, Brun LR, et al. Cell autonomous requirement of connexin 43 for osteocyte survival: consequences for endocortical resorption and periosteal bone formation. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(2):374–89. Epub 2011/10/27. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.548 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3271138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Plotkin LI, Stains JP. Connexins and pannexins in the skeleton: gap junctions, hemichannels and more. Cellular and molecular life sciences: CMLS. 2015;72(15):2853–67. Epub 2015/06/21. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-1963-6 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4503509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li X, Ominsky MS, Niu QT, Sun N, Daugherty B, D'Agostin D, et al. Targeted deletion of the sclerostin gene in mice results in increased bone formation and bone strength. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(6):860–9. Epub 2008/02/14. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080216 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Grimston SK, Watkins MP, Brodt MD, Silva MJ, Civitelli R. Enhanced periosteal and endocortical responses to axial tibial compression loading in conditional connexin43 deficient mice. PloS one. 2012;7(9):e44222 Epub 2012/09/13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044222 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3438198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bivi N, Pacheco-Costa R, Brun LR, Murphy TR, Farlow NR, Robling AG, et al. Absence of Cx43 Selectively from Osteocytes Enhances Responsiveness to Mechanical Force in Mice. J Orthop Res. 2013. Epub 2013/03/14. doi: 10.1002/jor.22341 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grimston SK, Goldberg DB, Watkins M, Brodt MD, Silva MJ, Civitelli R. Connexin43 deficiency reduces the sensitivity of cortical bone to the effects of muscle paralysis. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(9):2151–60. Epub 2011/05/19. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.425 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3306012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Morse A, McDonald MM, Kelly NH, Melville KM, Schindeler A, Kramer I, et al. Mechanical load increases in bone formation via a sclerostin-independent pathway. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(11):2456–67. Epub 2014/05/14. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2278 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4501925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Moustafa A, Sugiyama T, Prasad J, Zaman G, Gross TS, Lanyon LE, et al. Mechanical loading-related changes in osteocyte sclerostin expression in mice are more closely associated with the subsequent osteogenic response than the peak strains engendered. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(4):1225–34. Epub 2011/05/17. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1656-4 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3304063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lin C, Jiang X, Dai Z, Guo X, Weng T, Wang J, et al. Sclerostin mediates bone response to mechanical unloading through antagonizing Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24(10):1651–61. Epub 2009/05/08. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.090411 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nguyen J, Tang SY, Nguyen D, Alliston T. Load regulates bone formation and Sclerostin expression through a TGFbeta-dependent mechanism. PloS one. 2013;8(1):e53813 Epub 2013/01/12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053813 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3538690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Reaume AG, Desousa PA, Kulkarni S, Langille BL, Zhu DG, Davies TC, et al. Cardiac Malformation in Neonatal Mice Lacking Connexin43. Science. 1995;267(5205):1831–4. doi: 10.1126/science.7892609 PubMed PMID: ISI:A1995QN70200042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lecanda F, Warlow PM, Sheikh S, Furlan F, Steinberg TH, Civitelli R. Connexin43 deficiency causes delayed ossification, craniofacial abnormalities, and osteoblast dysfunction. J Cell Biol. 2000;151(4):931–44. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Di Benedetto A, Watkins M, Grimston S, Salazar V, Donsante C, Mbalaviele G, et al. N-cadherin and cadherin 11 modulate postnatal bone growth and osteoblast differentiation by distinct mechanisms. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(Pt 15):2640–8. Epub 2010/07/08. doi: jcs.067777 [pii] doi: 10.1242/jcs.067777 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2908051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Silva MJ, Ulrich SR. In vitro sodium fluoride exposure decreases torsional and bending strength and increases ductility of mouse femora. J Biomech. 2000;33(2):231–4. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00158-X PubMed PMID: ISI:000084838600013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Application to Practice. Norwalk, CT: Appelton and Lange; 1993. 525–6 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Guerrero PA, Schuessler RB, Davis LM, Beyer EC, Johnson CM, Yamada KA, et al. Slow ventricular conduction in mice heterozygous for a connexin43 null mutation. JClinInvest. 1997;99(8):1991–8. PubMed PMID: 3300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Grimston SK, Screen J, Haskell JH, Chung DJ, Brodt MD, Silva MJ, et al. Role of connexin43 in osteoblast response to physical load. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2006;1068:214–24. PubMed doi: 10.1196/annals.1346.023 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.van der Heyden MA, Rook MB, Hermans MM, Rijksen G, Boonstra J, Defize LH, et al. Identification of connexin43 as a functional target for Wnt signalling. J Cell Sci. 1998;111 (Pt 12):1741–9. PubMed PMID: 4276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Clevers H, Nusse R. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012;149(6):1192–205. Epub 2012/06/12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stolina M, Dwyer D, Niu QT, Villasenor KS, Kurimoto P, Grisanti M, et al. Temporal changes in systemic and local expression of bone turnover markers during six months of sclerostin antibody administration to ovariectomized rats. Bone. 2014;67:305–13. Epub 2014/08/06. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.031 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Florio M, Gunasekaran K, Stolina M, Li X, Liu L, Tipton B, et al. A bispecific antibody targeting sclerostin and DKK-1 promotes bone mass accrual and fracture repair. Nature communications. 2016;7:11505 Epub 2016/05/28. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11505 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4894982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Primer sequences.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Supporting data on mouse growth.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Supporting data on bone microstructure.

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Supporting data on gene expression.

(XLSX)

S5 Table. Supporting data on histomorphometry.

(XLSX)

S6 Table. Supporting data on biomechanics.

(XLSX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES