Abstract
A direct, mild, and general method for the enantioselective allylsilylation of aldehydes with allyl chlorides is reported. The reactions are effectively catalyzed by 5 mol% of n-Bu4NBr, and this rate acceleration allows the use of complex allyl donors in fragment-coupling reactions and of electron-deficient allyl donors. The results are 1) significant progress toward a “universal” asymmetric aldehyde allylation reaction that can reliably and highly stereoselectively couple any allyl chloride-aldehyde combination, and 2) the discovery of a novel mode of nucleophilic catalysis for aldehyde allylsilylation reactions.
Graphical abstract

Despite major progress on effective methods for highly stereoselective aldehyde allylation1,2 and crotylation3 reactions, including the Krische approach which heretofore uniquely obviates preformation and isolation of the active allylmetal(loid) species,4 the full potential of this reaction type remains unfulfilled. For example, direct fragment coupling allylation reactions with complex and high MW allyl donors (e.g. the hypothetical synthesis of the EF half of spongistatin 1 by way of a direct coupling of (E)-4-chloropenta-2,4-dienal (1) and complex allyl chloride 2 (Figure 1a) are essentially unknown.5 More generally, the development of a “universal” Type 16 aldehyde allylation reaction that can directly and efficiently couple any allyl-X donor in a practical and sustainable way and with reliably high levels of both efficiency and stereoselectivity would greatly expand the utility of this reaction type in the synthesis of a broad array of structurally diverse targets (Figure 1b). Our second-generation allylsilylation methodology7 is characterized by many of the attributes listed in Figure 1b, but the scope with respect to the allyl donor is limited to simple low MW and alkyl-substituted (i.e. electron-rich) allyl fragments by the requirement for preformation (by way of the Benkeser-Furuya reaction8,9) and isolation of the allyl trichlorosilanes and by limited allylsilane reactivity, respectively (Figure 1c). To more fully realize a “universal” and direct allylation reaction, we set out to address these serious limitations and report herein that the critical enabling discovery was that these allylsilylation reactions are effectively catalyzed by tetrabutylammonium bromide.
Figure 1.

(a) A hypothetical direct complex fragment coupling allylation of aldehyde 1 with stereochemically and functionally complex allyl chloride 2. (b) Desirable attributes of a “universal” and direct aldehyde allylation reaction. (c) Our allylsilylation method entails preformation and isolation of the allyl trichlorosilanes, and has a limited scope with respect to the allyl donor.
At the outset, we were optimistic that the Benkeser-Furuya reaction could be effectively telescoped10 with the allylation reaction given that its only byproduct is Et3N•HCl. This turned out not to be the case, however, as the fully telescoped reaction with dihydrocinnamaldehyde led to the isolation of the product in only 34% yield (Table 1, entry 1), a result that may be attributed to silylchlorohydrin formation (see Figure S1 and structure F in Figure 4b, below) in direct analogy to the observations of Denmark in Lewis base-catalyzed reactions of allyl- and enoltrichlorosilanes with unhindered aliphatic aldehydes.11 In the course of our attempts to overcome this problem, we found that whereas CuBr performed no better than CuCl (entry 2), use of the crotyl bromide starting material led to improved results (entry 3). While this was encouraging, the considerable practical advantages that would accrue from the use of allyl chlorides led us to wonder whether the bromide ion generated in this reaction may be catalyzing the reaction, and in turn that the reaction with crotyl chloride might be rendered efficient by adding a bromide ion source. Indeed, it was found that 5 mol % of n-Bu4NBr had a dramatic impact on the efficiency of the reaction with crotyl chloride (entry 4), and we note that the n-Bu4NBr has no impact on the Benkeser-Furuya reaction and that there is no Finkelstein reaction under these conditions (see Figure S2). A survey of other salts revealed that n-Bu4NI is equally effective (entry 5) while n-Bu4NOTf, n-Bu4NBF4, and n-Bu4NPF6 were found to be competent but less efficient catalysts (entries 6–8).
Table 1.
Reaction optimization
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| entry | X | CuY | additive | yield (%) |
| 1 | Cl | CuCl | – | 34 |
| 2 | Cl | CuBr | – | 27 |
| 3 | Br | CuBr | – | 76 |
| 4 | Cl | CuBr | n-Bu4NBr | 86 |
| 5 | Cl | CuBr | n-Bu4NI | 86 |
| 6 | Cl | CuBr | n-Bu4NOTf | 76 |
| 7 | Cl | CuBr | n-Bu4NBF4 | 77 |
| 8 | Cl | CuBr | n-Bu4NPF6 | 54 |
Figure 4.

(a) Mechanistic scheme for Denmark’s LB-catalyzed allylation and aldol reactions. (b) Proposed mechanism of the anion-catalyzed allylation reaction. (c) Spectroscopic evidence for the formation of B and G.
With optimized conditions identified, we set out to explore the scope of the reaction with respect to the allyl chloride (Table 2). Methallyl chloride (entry 1), and functionalized methallyl chlorides (entries 2 and 3) work well in the reaction, as do trans-crotyl chloride (entries 4 and 5), a substituted trans-crotyl chloride (entry 6), and trans-cinnamyl chloride (entry 7). Entry 6 is particularly noteworthy as the product of that reaction was an intermediate in our synthesis of a “methyl-extended” linker-equipped analog of dictyostatin12 that was previously prepared by an only moderately diasteroselective and inefficient process. 3,3-Disubstituted allyl chlorides also work well and allow the establishment of all-carbon quaternary centers (entries 8 and 9).13 Halogens are well tolerated at the 2-position of the allyl chloride leading to usefully functionalized alkene products (entries 10 and 11),14 while heteroatom (Cl,15 BPin16) substitution is also well tolerated at the 3-position (entries 12–15). Control reactions with no n-Bu4NBr established that the catalysis is in most cases critical for synthetically useful results (entries 4a, 5, 6, 9, 12, and 13), and whereas the reactions with simple alkyl-substituted (i.e. electron-rich) allyl donors are efficient when run with isolated allyltrichlorosilanes (cf. Figure 1c), reactions with electronically deactivated allyl donors (entries 10–15) are not. Thus, in addition to enabling the significant practical advance of the fully telescoped procedure that obviates the technically difficult and tedious isolation of the allyltrichlorosilanes, the n-Bu4NBr catalysis also enables a substantial expansion in scope with respect to the allyl donor.
Table 2.
Exploration of scope for the allyl chloride
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| entry | allyl chloride | product | yield (%)a | ee (%) |
| 1 |
|
|
90 | 97 |
| 2 |
|
|
72 | 94 |
| 3 |
|
|
88 | 95 |
| 4a |
|
|
86 (27) | 97 |
| 4b | 91 | 97 | ||
| (20 mmol scale) | ||||
| 5b |
|
|
90 (84) | 91 |
| 6c |
|
|
83 (13) | 94 |
| 7 |
|
|
96 | 97 |
| 8 |
|
|
93 | 92 |
| 9 |
|
|
83 (61) | 95 |
| 10 |
|
|
74 | 98 |
| 11 |
|
|
71 | 99 |
| 12 |
|
|
78 (24) | 95 |
| 13b |
|
|
74 (16) | 93 |
| 14 |
|
|
72 | 96 |
| 15 |
|
|
95 | 94 |
The values in parentheses are the yields of the reactions with no added n-Bu4NBr under otherwise identical conditions.
These reactions were conducted with benzaldehyde.
This reaction was conducted with aldehyde 4, and treated with 1 M HCl prior to workup and product isolation to hydrolyze the ketal.
To demonstrate that the n-Bu4NBr catalysis can enable direct complex fragment coupling reactions, we used diallyl chloride 5 to allylate aldehyde 6 to give 7 in 89% yield and 95% ee (Figure 2). Alcohol acetylation produced 8, which, like allyl chloride 2 comprises stereochemical complexity near the allyl chloride as well as an acid-sensitive ketal. Initial attempts to allylate aldehyde 1 with 8 were unsuccessful due to ketal degradation presumably caused by adventitious HCl generated in the Benkeser-Furuya reaction. While simply using excess Et3N could in principle be a simple solution to this problem, in practice excess Et3N negatively impacts the ligand complexation. Fortunately, we found that 2,6-di-t-Bu-pyridine is an effective and otherwise innocent base, and these modified conditions led to the isolation of 9 in 77% yield and ≥20:1 dr. In addition to serving as a meaningful model for the spongistatin 1 EF fragment synthesis (cf. Figure 1a), this 3-step sequence also demonstrates the direct use of 5 as a linchpin reagent, allowing the rapid buildup of complexity from simple starting materials.
Figure 2.

Model fragment coupling allylation reaction for the synthesis of the EF-half of spongistatin 1.
We have measured the rate of conversion of the trans-crotylation of benzaldehyde starting from trans-crotyltrichlorosilane with 5 mol % n-Bu4NBr and with no additive (Figure 3). As chloride ion is present in these reactions and may also be catalyzing the reaction, we also endeavored to prepare a sample of chloride-free crotylsilane 10 in an attempt to measure the true coordinating anion-free background reaction. Though complete removal of the DBU•HCl salts by trituration is difficult, we were able to isolate a sample of 10 contaminated only with ~8% DBU•HCl, and treated it with 12 mol % AgBArF4 (ArF = 3,5-(CF3)2C6H3)17 prior to using it in these experiments. As shown, the data establish that chloride and bromide greatly accelerate the reaction relative to the coordinating anion-free background reaction, strongly implying a direct role for the anion component of the tetrabutylammonium salts in the catalysis.
Figure 3.

Rate measurements of the crotylation of PhCHO. Each data point is the average of 3 runs (2 in the case of chloride-free silane 10), measuring the disappearance of PhCHO (measuring the appearance of product gives similar results) against a quantitative internal standard by 1H NMR spectroscopy
In considering the mechanism of the catalysis, we were cognizant of Berrisford’s report that tetra-alkylammonium salts accelerate the DMF-promoted allylation of benzaldehyde with allyltrichlorosilane,18 and Denmark’s demonstration that n-Bu4NI or n-Bu4NOTf led in a few cases to a modest increase in the efficiency of Lewis base-catalyzed reactions with aliphatic aldehydes that suffered from silylchlorohydrin formation.11,19 These effects were attributed to an increase in the ionic strength of the medium that would be expected to favor formation of the active ionic species 11 and to disfavor the formally neutral silylchlorohydrin 12 (Figure 4a). The data in Figure 3 strongly imply a direct role for the anion in our system, however, and our allylsilane (A, Figure 4b) has no ionizable substituent, rendering this mechanism highly implausible in our reactions. We propose instead that the catalyst X− activates the allylsilane by forming allylsilicate B, which binds (C) and allylates (D) the aldehyde by way of a 6-coordinate silicate at a greatly accelerated rate (kX−) over the coordinating anion-free background reaction (k0) before releasing the catalyst and generating the product E (Figure 4b). A propensity to form dianion G would be expected to inhibit the reaction and this may provide an explanation for the poorer performance of certain anions. Indeed, treatment of crotylsilane 10 with excess n-Bu4NBr led to 29Si NMR resonances consistent with 5- and 6-coordinate silicates, thus providing direct spectroscopic evidence for the formation of both B and G (Figure 4c). Though it has been shown that strong nucleophiles (e.g. fluoride, catecholate) may be used to pre-form 5-coordinate allylsilicates that are activated for aldehyde allylsilylation reactions,20 the effective use of more weakly coordinating anions as catalysts reported here is without precedent. We suggest that the key to accessing this mode of nucleophilic catalysis is the pre-activation of the silane by ligand 3, which induces Lewis acidity7 sufficient for the reversible binding of less strongly nucleophilic anions.
We have discovered that tetrabutylammonium salts catalyze aldehyde allylsilylation reactions with our diaminophenol-ligated allylsilanes. This catalysis allows both for a significant expansion in scope with respect to the allyl donor and for the direct use of allyl chlorides without preformation and isolation of the allyltrichlorosilanes, which in turn allows, uniquely, for the direct use of stereochemically and/or functionally complex allyl donors in fragment coupling allylation reactions. The result is the most significant progress yet reported toward the realization of a “universal” direct aldehyde allylation reaction possessed of the attributes outlined in Figure 1b. Mechanistically, we have secured evidence that the catalyst plays a direct role in accelerating the carbon-carbon bond-forming event by accessing the more reactive 5-coordinate allylsilicate, and this may have implications for the design of catalytic enantioselective variants of this reaction as well as for the catalysis of a range of otherwise difficult transformations. Efforts along these lines and to further elucidate the mechanistic details of the catalysis are underway.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute Of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01GM058133. M.A.T.-S. is the recipient of a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. K.S.W. was supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship (124489-PF-13-311-01-CDD) from the American Cancer Society. We thank Brian Trippe (Columbia College, 2016) for developing a modification to the synthesis of diaminophenol 3 (see the Supporting Information).
Footnotes
Supporting Information. Experimental procedures and compound characterization data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
References
- 1.(a) Denmark SE, Almstead NG. In: Modern Carbonyl Chemistry. Otera J, editor. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, Germany: 2000. Chapter 10. [Google Scholar]; (b) Chemler SR, Roush WR. In: Modern Carbonyl Chemistry. Otera J, editor. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, Germany: 2000. Chapter 11. [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Yamamoto Y, Asao N. Chem Rev. 1993;93:2207–2293. [Google Scholar]; (b) Masse CE, Panek JS. Chem Rev. 1995;95:1293–1316. [Google Scholar]; (c) Ramachandran PV. Aldrichimica Acta. 2002;35:23–35. [Google Scholar]; (d) Denmark SE, Fu J. Chem Rev. 2003;103:2763–2794. doi: 10.1021/cr020050h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Kennedy JWJ, Hall DG. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:4732–4739. doi: 10.1002/anie.200301632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Hall DG. Synlett. 2007:1644–1655. [Google Scholar]; (g) Lachance H, Hall DG. Org React. 2008;73:1–573. [Google Scholar]; (h) Leighton JL. Aldrichimica Acta. 2010;43:3–12. [Google Scholar]; (i) Yus M, González-Gómez JC, Foubelo F. Chem Rev. 2011;111:7774–7854. doi: 10.1021/cr1004474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Brown HC, Bhat KS. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108:293–294. doi: 10.1021/ja00279a042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Brown HC, Bhat KS. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108:5919–5923. doi: 10.1021/ja00279a042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Garcia J, Kim BM, Masamune S. J Org Chem. 1987;52:4831–4832. [Google Scholar]; (d) Roush WR, Ando K, Powers DB, Palkowitz AD, Halterman RL. J Am Chem Soc. 1990;112:6339–6348. [Google Scholar]; (e) Roush WR, Palkowitz AD, Ando K. J Am Chem Soc. 1990;112:6348–6359. [Google Scholar]; (f) Hafner A, Duthlaer RO, Marti R, Rihs G, Rothe-Streit P, Schwarzenbach F. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:2321–2336. [Google Scholar]; (g) Jain NF, Takenaka N, Panek JS. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:12475–12476. [Google Scholar]; (h) Denmark SE, Fu J. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:9488–9489. doi: 10.1021/ja016552e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Lachance H, Lu X, Gravel M, Hall DG. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:10160–10161. doi: 10.1021/ja036807j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Burgos CH, Canales E, Matos K, Soderquist JA. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:8044–8049. doi: 10.1021/ja043612i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (k) Kim H, Ho S, Leighton JL. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:6517–6520. doi: 10.1021/ja200712f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Kim IS, Ngai MY, Krische MJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:6340–6341. doi: 10.1021/ja802001b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kim IS, Ngai MY, Krische MJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:14891–14899. doi: 10.1021/ja805722e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kim IS, Han SB, Krische MJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:2514–2520. doi: 10.1021/ja808857w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Han SB, Han H, Krische MJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:1760–1761. doi: 10.1021/ja9097675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Zhang YJ, Yang JH, Kim SH, Krische MJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:4562–4563. doi: 10.1021/ja100949e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Han SB, Gao X, Krische MJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:9153–9156. doi: 10.1021/ja103299f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Gao X, Zhang YJ, Krische MJ. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:4173–4175. doi: 10.1002/anie.201008296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Hassan A, Townsend IA, Krische MJ. Chem Commun. 2011;47:10028–10030. doi: 10.1039/c1cc14392a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Gao X, Han H, Krische MJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:12795–12800. doi: 10.1021/ja204570w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.For examples of indirect fragment coupling allylation reactions with pre-formation and isolation of the complex allylmetal(loid) species, see:; (a) Williams DR, Meyer KG. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:765–766. doi: 10.1021/ja005644l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wender PA, Hegde SG, Hubbard RD, Zhang L. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:4956–4957. doi: 10.1021/ja0258428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Denmark SE, Weber E. Helv Chim Acta. 1983;66:1655–1660. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Suen LM, Steigerwald ML, Leighton JL. Chem Sci. 2013;4:2413–2417. doi: 10.1039/C3SC50714A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Benkeser RA, Gaul JM, Smith WE. J Am Chem Soc. 1969;91:3666–3667. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Furuya N, Sukawa T. J Organomet Chem. 1975;96:C1–C3. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kobayashi S, Nishio K. J Org Chem. 1994;59:6620–6628. [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) Denmark SE, Su X, Nishigaichi Y. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:12990–12991. [Google Scholar]; (b) Denmark SE, Pham SM, Stavenger RA, Su X, Wong KT, Nishigaichi Y. J Org Chem. 2006;71:3904–3922. doi: 10.1021/jo060243v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Denmark SE, Wynn T, Beutner GL. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:13405–13407. doi: 10.1021/ja0282947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Denmark SE, Beutner GL, Wynn T, Eastgate MD. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:3774–3789. doi: 10.1021/ja047339w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ho S, Sackett DL, Leighton JL. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:14047–14050. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b09869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.(a) Denmark SE, Fu J, Lawler MJ. J Org Chem. 2006;71:1523–1536. doi: 10.1021/jo052203h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Marek I, Sklute G. Chem Commun. 2007:1683–1691. doi: 10.1039/b615042j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.For other enantioselective aldehyde 2-haloallylation reactions, see:; (a) Corey EJ, Yu CM, Kim SS. J Am Chem Soc. 1989;111:5495–5496. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kurosu M, Lin MH, Kishi Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:12248–12249. doi: 10.1021/ja045557j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.For other enantioselective aldehyde α-haloallyation reactions, see:; (a) Hu S, Jayaraman S, Oehlschlager AC. J Org Chem. 1996;61:7513–7520. doi: 10.1021/jo960875p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Bandini M, Cozzi PG, Melchiorre P, Morganti S, Umani-Ronchi A. Org Lett. 2001;3:1153–1155. doi: 10.1021/ol015597h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kobayashi S, Endo T, Ueno M. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:12262–12265. doi: 10.1002/anie.201106433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.For other enantioselective aldehyde α-boronoallyation reactions, see:; (a) Brown HC, Narla G. J Org Chem. 1995;60:4686–4687. [Google Scholar]; (b) Flamme EM, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:13644–13645. doi: 10.1021/ja028055j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kister J, DeBaillie AC, Lira R, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:14174–14175. doi: 10.1021/ja905494c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Chen M, Handa M, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:14602–14603. doi: 10.1021/ja904599h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) González AZ, Román JG, Alicea E, Canales E, Soderquist JA. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:1269–1273. doi: 10.1021/ja808360z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Fernández E, Pietruszka J. Synlett. 2009:1474–1476. [Google Scholar]; (g) Böse D, Niesobski P, Lübcke M, Pietruszka J. J Org Chem. 2014;79:4699–4703. doi: 10.1021/jo5004168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.(a) Golden JH, Mutolo PF, Lobkovsky EB, DiSalvo FJ. Inorg Chem. 1994;33:5374–5375. [Google Scholar]; (b) Hayashi Y, Rohde JJ, Corey EJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:5502–5503. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Short JD, Attenoux S, Berrisford DJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:2351–2354. [Google Scholar]
- 19.(a) Denmark SE, Su X, Nishigaichi Y. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:12990–12991. [Google Scholar]; (b) Denmark SE, Pham SM, Stavenger RA, Su X, Wong KT, Nishigaichi Y. J Org Chem. 2006;71:3904–3922. doi: 10.1021/jo060243v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Denmark SE, Wynn T, Beutner GL. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:13405–13407. doi: 10.1021/ja0282947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Denmark SE, Beutner GL, Wynn T, Eastgate MD. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:3774–3789. doi: 10.1021/ja047339w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.(a) Kira M, Kobayashi M, Sakurai H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987;28:4081–4084. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kira M, Hino T, Sakurai H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989;30:1099–1102. [Google Scholar]; (c) Sato K, Kira M, Sakurai H. J Am Chem Soc. 1989;111:6429–6431. [Google Scholar]; (d) Kira M, Sato K, Sakurai H. J Am Chem Soc. 1990;112:257–260. [Google Scholar]; (e) Hosomi A, Kohra S, Ogata K, Yanagi T, Tominaga Y. J Org Chem. 1990;55:2415–2420. [Google Scholar]; (f) Chemler SR, Roush WR. J Org Chem. 1998;63:3800–3801. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
