Abstract
Background
Hispanic patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have decreased life expectancy compared to non-Hispanic white patients. Pulmonary function is a main predictor of life expectancy in CF. Ethnic differences in pulmonary function in CF have been understudied. The objective was to compare longitudinal pulmonary function between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients with CF.
Methods
This cohort study of 15,018 6–25 years old patients in the CF Foundation Patient Registry from 2008 to 2013 compared FEV1 percent predicted and longitudinal change in FEV1 percent predicted in Hispanic to non-Hispanic white patients. We used linear mixed effects models with patient-specific slopes and intercepts, adjusting for 14 demographic and clinical variables. We did sub-analyses by CFTR class, F508del copies, and PERT use.
Results
Hispanic patients had lower FEV1 percent predicted (79.9%) compared with non-Hispanic white patients (85.6%); (−5.8%, 95% CI −6.7% to −4.8%, p<0.001), however, there was no difference in FEV1 decline over time. Patients on PERT had a larger difference between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients in FEV1 percent predicted than patients not on PERT (−6.0% vs. −4.1%, p=0.02). The ethnic difference in FEV1 percent predicted was not statistically significant between CFTR classes (Class I–III: −6.1%, Class IV–V: −5.9%, Unclassified: −5.7%, p>0.05) or between F508del copies (None: −7.6%, Heterozygotes: −5.6%, Homozygotes: −5.3%, p>0.05).
Conclusions
Disparities in pulmonary function exist in Hispanic patients with CF early in life and then persist without improving or worsening over time. It is valuable to investigate the factors contributing to pulmonary function in Hispanic patients with CF.
Keywords: Cystic Fibrosis (CF), Epidemiology, Pulmonary Function Testing (PFT), Social Dimensions of Pulmonary Medicine, Healthcare Disparities, Hispanic Latino
Introduction
Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is the second most common life-shortening childhood disease. CF causes chronic lung damage from infections leading to respiratory failure. While CF predominately affects non-Hispanic white patients (94%), the percentage of Hispanic patients with CF has doubled in the past 20 years in the CF Foundation Patient Registry (CCFPR)1. As birthrates in Hispanic Americans increase in the US compared with non-Hispanic white Americans2, the proportion of patients with CF who are Hispanic will likely increase commensurately. Despite great advances in CF treatment and survival, Hispanic patients have an 85% increased risk of death annually due to CF3 compared with non-Hispanic white patients. It is not known why Hispanic patients with CF have shorter life expectancy.
Pulmonary function is the strongest predictor of life expectancy in CF4. Pulmonary function is determined by environmental, healthcare-related, and biological factors, some of which are known to be different in Hispanic patients. CF transmembrane receptor (CFTR) gene mutation severity affects pulmonary function5. Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients have different distributions of CFTR mutations6–8, including Hispanic patients are more likely to have rare or de novo mutations7. Pancreatic insufficiency is associated with more severe pulmonary function and Hispanic patients are less likely to have pancreatic insufficiency9. Hispanic patients acquire Pseudomonas at an earlier age, which negatively affects pulmonary function8. The effect of many of these factors on pulmonary function in Hispanic patients is unknown.
While ethnic disparities in pulmonary function in CF have been described previously, the analyses were unadjusted for confounders known to affect pulmonary function8; 10. We used a large database of Hispanic patients with CF, the CFFPR1, to investigate longitudinal change in pulmonary function between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients with CF.
Methods
Study Population
This is a cohort study of Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients in the CFFPR, a retrospective observational study of individuals from accredited CF centers which includes approximately 81–84% of CF patients in the US11. We included 15,268 patients with CF, ages 6 to 25 years old, between January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2013, with pulmonary function measured at least once. Patients contributed between 1 and 19 measures of pulmonary function, with an average of 8.1 measurements. We analyzed all data from time of entry to CFFPR until December 31, 2013 or age >25 years.
Outcome Variables
Percent predicted pulmonary function was calculated based on Global Lung Initiative (GLI) equations12. The primary outcomes were forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) percent predicted and annual change in FEV1 percent predicted. Forced vital capacity (FVC) percent predicted, forced expiratory flow at 25%–75% of FVC (FEF25–75%) percent predicted, and FEV1/FVC were secondary outcomes. Annual pulmonary function was the average of the 4 highest quarterly values during a calendar year. We did not include data obtained after lung transplantation. Change in FEV1 percent predicted was not analyzed in the 445 patients with only 1 measurement of FEV1 percent predicted.
Predictor Variable
The primary predictors were patient age and self-reported race and ethnicity, characterized as Hispanic or non-Hispanic white. Since age varies both within and between patients, we isolated the pure within-patient change by decomposing the age covariate into between- and within-patient components13; 14. Specifically, we calculated patient-specific mean age as the between-patient component, as well as the deviations of each patient’s age from their patient-specific mean age as the within-patient component, and included both components in our models.
Covariates
The following variables were included a priori in all models: age, sex, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT), body mass index (BMI), sweat chloride concentration, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, tobacco exposure, age at diagnosis, CF-related diabetes, CFTR mutation class, and location. Insurance status, maternal education, and household income were considered as surrogates for socioeconomic status (SES)15–17. Insurance status and maternal education were statistically significant and included in all models.
Covariates were recorded annually. Patients were classified as underweight if their BMI was <10th percentile if age <20 years or BMI was <18.5 kg/m2 if age ≥20 years18. Patients were considered MRSA or Pseudomonas positive if there was a positive respiratory culture. Maternal education was defined as high school or less compared with some college or more. Insurance type was defined as whether the patient had Medicaid regardless of secondary insurance listed, no Medicaid, or no insurance. Tobacco exposure was defined as no tobacco, secondhand tobacco exposure, and active smoker. Age at diagnosis was recorded in months. F508del copies were defined as homozygotes, heterozygotes, or no copies. CFTR mutation classes were defined as CFTR class I–III, CFTR class IV–V, or unclassified5. Location in the US was defined as West, Midwest, Northeast, or South by US census classification19. Missing data in covariates was assessed and assumed to be missing at random, as missingness is associated with CF center ID20, perhaps due to some CF centers not collecting complete datasets.
Statistical Analysis
We fit linear mixed effects regression models to the longitudinal pulmonary function data with patient-specific random intercepts and random slopes to compare pulmonary function between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients. The models included the between- and within-patient components of age described above. The regression coefficient of the within-patient age component is the change in pulmonary function as a patient aged by one year. The regression coefficient of the between-patient age component is the difference in pulmonary function between two patients whose average age in the study differed by one year13; 14. To determine annual change in FEV1 percent predicted, we assessed the interaction of ethnicity and within-patient age using a Wald test.
Since the missing at random assumption seemed reasonable, we performed multiple imputations by chained equations to address missing data (10 data sets were imputed and analyzed)21. For subgroup analyses, we included the interaction of ethnicity and the variable of interest into the model. We compared ethnic differences in FEV1 percent predicted by PERT use, F508del copies, and CFTR mutation severity. To assure our findings were not an artifact of the GLI predictive equations12, we compared the results to two other well-accepted predictive equations used for CF: Wang-Hankinson22; 23 and CF-specific24.
A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed with Stata 14.1 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas). The study was approved by the University of California San Francisco IRB.
Results
Study Population Characteristics
The study sample consisted of 15,018 individuals with CF from the CFFPR who were Hispanic or non-Hispanic white, after excluding 523 patients due to no pulmonary function measurements and 210 patients due to missing race/ethnicity. Post-pulmonary transplant pulmonary function was not analyzed in 347 patients. Hispanic patients made up 9.9% of the study sample (Table 1). Compared to non-Hispanic white patients, Hispanic patients were diagnosed later (6.3 vs. 4.5 months), less likely to use PERT (88.5% vs. 92.5%), less likely to be F508del homozygotes (25.9% vs. 49.9%), and less likely to have CFTR Class I–III mutations (51.4% vs. 74.1%).
Table 1.
Study Population Characteristics At Cohort Entry
Hispanic Patients |
Non-Hispanic White Patients |
Difference (95% CI) |
p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number (%) | 1,493 (9.9) | 13,525 (90.1) | ||
Age, yeara | 6.9 (6.5–7.4) | 6.8 (6.5–7.1) | 0.1 (0 to 0.3) | <0.001 |
Sex, male | 826 (53.1) | 7,233 (51.1) | 2.0 (−1.7 to 5.6) | 0.1 |
PERT | 1,343 (88.5) | 12,755 (92.3) | 3.8 (2.1 to 5.7) | <0.001 |
Sweat Chloride Concentrationa | 94.7 (93.5–95.9) | 97.1 (96.7–97.5) | −2.4 (−3.5 to −1.2) | <0.001 |
Age At Diagnosis, mthsa | 6.3 (1.6–38.4) | 4.5 (0.7–25.7) | 1.8 (0.9 to 12.7) | <0.001 |
Body Mass Indexa | ||||
Percentile (if <20yo) | 54.1 (53.6–55.6) | 50.6 (50.1–51.0) | 3.6 (2.0 to 5.1) | <0.001 |
BMI kg/m2 (if ≥20yo) | 24.0 (21.0–27.0) | 23.3 (22.1–24.5) | 0.7 (−2.6 to 3.9) | 0.7 |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 597 (38.3%) | 4,766 (33.6%) | 4.7 (0.6 to 9.0) | <0.001 |
MRSA | 195 (12.5%) | 2,272 (16.0%) | −3.5 (−4.5 to −2.3) | 0.001 |
CF Related Diabetes | 63 (4.1%) | 688 (4.9%) | −0.8 (−7.6 to 4.7) | <0.001 |
Tobacco Exposure | <0.001 | |||
None | 776 (49.8%) | 6,476 (45.7%) | 4.1 (0.3 to 7.9) | |
Secondhand | 100 (6.4%) | 1,288 (9.1%) | −2.7 (−7.0 to 4.2) | |
Active Smoker | 8 (0.5%) | 84 (0.6%) | −0.1 (−5.0 to 37.1) | |
Maternal Education | <0.001 | |||
College & Higher | 231 (15.5%) | 3,625 (26.8%) | −11.3 (−12.3 to −10.0) | |
No College | 316 (20.3%) | 2,051 (14.5%) | 5.8 (1.2 to 10.9) | |
Insurance | <0.001 | |||
No Medicaid | 539 (34.6%) | 7.718 (54.5%) | −19.9 (−24.1 to −15.6) | |
Medicaid | 901 (57.9%) | 5,878 (41.5%) | 16.4 (12.9 to 19.9) | |
No Insurance | 31 (2.0%) | 88 (0.6%) | 1.4 (−3.7 to 14.2) | |
F508del | <0.001 | |||
Two copies | 403 (25.9%) | 7,070 (49.9%) | −24.0 (−28.4 to −19.3) | |
One copy | 583 (37.4%) | 5,100 (36.0%) | 1.4 (−2.8 to 5.7) | |
No copies | 469 (30.1%) | 1,472 (10.4%) | 19.7 (15.3 to 24.3) | |
CFTR Mutation Class | <0.001 | |||
Class I–III | 800 (51.4%) | 10,503 (74.1%) | −22.7 (−26.3 to −19.1) | |
Class IV–V | 133 (8.5%) | 1,033 (7.3%) | 1.2 (−3.3 to 7.5) | |
Not Classified | 522 (33.5%) | 2,106 (14.9%) | 18.6 (14.3 to 23.1) | |
Location In U.S. | <0.001 | |||
West | 545 (35.0%) | 2,266 (16.0%) | 19 (14.7 to 23.4) | |
Midwest | 451 (29.0%) | 5,070 (35.8%) | −6.8 (−11.2 to −2.2) | |
Northeast | 236 (15.2%) | 3,181 (22.5%) | −7.3 (−11.9 to −1.9) | |
South | 282 (18.1%) | 3,511 (24.8%) | −6.3 (−11.2 to −1.5) |
Median (Interquartile range)
-All other values are reported as percentages
Pulmonary Function
Hispanic patients had lower FEV1 percent predicted, FVC percent predicted, FEF25–75 percent predicted, and FEV1/FVC compared with non-Hispanic white patients (Figure 1, Table 2). There was no statistical difference in the between-patient change in FEV1 percent predicted and in the within-patient change in FEV1 percent predicted (Wald test p=0.1) (Table 2).
Figure 1. FEV1 Percent Predicted In Hispanic And Non-Hispanic White Patients With Cystic Fibrosis.
Longitudinal FEV1 Percent Predicted adjusted for the following confounders: age, sex, BMI, sweat chloride concentration, PERT use, MRSA, pseudomonas aeruginosa, maternal education level, insurance type, tobacco exposure, age at diagnosis, CF-related diabetes, CFTR mutation severity, and location in the U.S.
Table 2.
Pulmonary Function In Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Patients With CF
Hispanic Patients |
Non-Hispanic White Patients |
Difference | 95% CI | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVC | 87.6% | 93.0% | −5.3% | −6.2% to −4.5% | <0.001 |
FEV1 | 79.9% | 85.6% | −5.8% | −6.7% to −4.8% | <0.001 |
FEV1 Between Patient Change | −1.02% | −1.25% | 0.23% | −0.00% to 0.46% | 0.05 |
FEV1 Within Patient Change | −0.03% | −0.02% | −0.01% | −0.06% to 0.04% | 0.6 |
FEF25–75 | 67.3% | 71.0% | −3.8% | −5.4% to −2.2% | <0.001 |
FEV1/FVC | 0.806 | 0.812 | −0.006 | −0.01 to −0.002 | 0.004 |
1,375 patients did not have FEF25–75% data. 445 patients did not have FEV1 decline data.
Models adjusted for age, sex, PERT, BMI, sweat chloride concentration, MRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, maternal education level, insurance type, tobacco exposure, age at diagnosis, CF-related diabetes, CFTR mutation class, and location.
All values shown are percent predicted except FEV1/FVC
Sub-analyses
In patients on PERT, there was a larger different in FEV1 percent predicted between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients compared to patients not on PERT (p=0.02, Table 3). The ethnic difference in FEV1 percent predicted was not statistically different between F508del homozygotes, F508del heterozygotes, or those with no F508del copies (p>0.05, Table 3). Patients with Class I–III CFTR mutations had a slightly larger difference between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients than in patients with Class IV–V CFTR mutations or unclassified CFTR mutations, but it was not statistically significant (p>0.05, Table 3).
Table 3.
Ethnic Differences In FEV1 Percent Predicted By PERT Use, F508del copies, and CFTR Mutation Class
FEV1 In Hispanic Patients |
FEV1 In Non-Hispanic White Patients |
Difference In FEV1 Percent Predicted |
95% CI | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement | |||||
| |||||
Yes | 79.3% | 85.3% | −6.0% | −6.6% to −5.3% | <0.001 |
No | 87.7% | 91.8% | −4.1% | −5.0% to −3.2% | <0.001 |
| |||||
F508del Copies | |||||
| |||||
Homozygote | 79.8% | 85.1% | −5.3% | −7.0% to −5.6% | <0.001 |
Heterozygote | 80.8% | 86.3% | −5.7% | −6.5% to −4.6% | <0.001 |
No Copies | 81.1% | 88.7% | −7.6% | −8.3% to −7.0% | <0.001 |
| |||||
CFTR Mutation Class | |||||
| |||||
Class I–III | 79.0% | 85.1% | −6.1% | −7.0% to −5.3% | <0.001 |
Class IV–V | 87.8% | 93.7% | −5.9% | −7.7% to −4.0% | <0.001 |
Unclassified | 81.8% | 87.5% | −5.7% | −6.5% to −5.0% | <0.001 |
F508del copies were defined as homozygotes, heterozygotes, or no copies. CFTR mutation class was defined as CFTR class I–III, CFTR class IV–V, and unclassified.
Models included the variable of interest (PERT use, F508del copies, or CFTR mutation class) with ethnicity interaction, adjusted for age, sex, PERT, BMI, sweat chloride concentration, MRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, maternal education level, insurance type, tobacco exposure, age at diagnosis, CF-related diabetes, CFTR mutation class, and location in U.S.
Sensitivity Analysis: Pulmonary Predictive Equations
Both Wang Hankinson22; 23 pulmonary predictive equations(−6.3%, 95% CI −7.3% to −5.3%, p<0.001) and CF-specific pulmonary predictive equations24 (−8.8; 95% CI −10.2 to −7.3%, p<0.001) had a larger difference in FEV1 percent predicted by ethnicity than with the GLI pulmonary predictive equations.
Discussion
In a large cohort of patients with CF, we found that the gap in pulmonary function between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients begins early in life. The ethnic gap in pulmonary function exists when spirometry is first performed at 6 years old. This suggests that factors contributing to the ethnic difference in pulmonary function occur much earlier than the time of first performing spirometry, anywhere from prenatal to age 5 years. We observed that Hispanic patients had a 5.8% lower FEV1 percent predicted than non-Hispanic white patients with CF. However, the degree of difference in FEV1 percent predicted was independent of age, as there was no difference in the rate of decline in FEV1 percent predicted by ethnicity from 6 to 25 years old. The ethnic gap in FEV1 percent predicted neither worsens nor improves over time, as there is no difference in the rate of decline by ethnicity from 6 to 25 years old.
Previous studies of pulmonary function in Hispanic patients with CF also found that Hispanic patients had lower pulmonary function. In a smaller cohort, Buu et al. found that in California at age 6 years old, Hispanic patients with CF had 12% lower FEV1 percent predicted than non-Hispanic patients, but was not adjusted for confounders10. Our results were similar to Watts et al. found that Hispanic patients had 5.5% lower FEV1 percent predicted than non-Hispanic white patients, but was not adjusted for confounders8. Our study advances the understanding of pulmonary function in Hispanic patients with CF by finding that even after controlling for factors known to impact pulmonary function, there is still a gap in pulmonary function between Hispanic and non-Hispanics white patients. This indicates that there are factors that have yet to be identified that negatively impact pulmonary function in Hispanic patients early in life, but do not change the trajectory of pulmonary function decline.
To combat health disparities in Hispanic patients with CF, it is essential to first understand the complex factors contributing to pulmonary function. There are several factors that influence the severity of pulmonary disease in CF and can be grouped into 3 classes: environmental (socioeconomic, air pollution, tobacco exposure); healthcare-related (medication compliance, medical literacy, medications prescribed); and biological (infections, genetics)16. Hispanic patients may have increased exposure to these factors or a differential response. To elucidate and address the stark disparities in pulmonary function require examination of all potential factors.
Environmental Contributing Factors
Approximately 50% of variation in pulmonary function in CF is due to environmental factors or exposures25–27. Overall, 20% of children with CF report tobacco exposure, while some CF centers report 90% of patients exposed1. Hispanic children are more likely to be exposed to both tobacco28 and air pollution29. Tobacco and air pollution negatively impact pulmonary function in children both with and without CF26; 27; 30–32, which may contribute to the observed ethnic disparity in CF. Hispanic patients may be differentially exposed of effected by environmental exposures early in life. This exposure may lower pulmonary function in Hispanic patients, but not steepen decline. Investigations are needed in the ethnic differences in both the differential exposure and effects of environmental factors, such as air pollution and secondhand tobacco.
There are socioeconomic factors unmeasured by the CFFPR that may influence Hispanic patients’ pulmonary function. Poor Hispanic individuals are more likely to live in higher poverty neighborhoods than poor non-Hispanic white individuals17. Wealth (e.g. savings, home ownership) can help buffer times of illness17, however, wealth varies by ethnicity in similar income brackets17. Future studies of disparities in CF should strive to collect as many measures of SES as possible.
Hispanic Specific Contributing Factors
Separate from SES, there are factors that affect pulmonary function in Hispanic patients in particular. Language spoken, fluency, and interpreter use affect understanding of CF, treatments, and medications33. Language barriers result in worse health outcomes in Hispanic patients34; 35 but have not been studied in CF. Language barriers may play a more significant role early in life when parents are learning about the diagnosis and treatments; this may lead to lower pulmonary function early in life, but not a steeper decline later in life. However, language is not the only barrier for Hispanic patients with CF. We found that Hispanic patients with CF are more likely to have Medicaid or no insurance. In CF, children with Medicaid have lower pulmonary function than those with non-Medicaid insurance15. Hispanic patients who have undocumented immigration status are at higher risk for not having insurance, even when the child is a US citizen36. Level of acculturation and immigration status negatively affect asthma severity in Hispanic patients37, but have not been studied in CF. Hispanic patients with CF are a diverse group culturally and have diverse barriers to adequate healthcare. There should be future studies of the effects of language, acculturation, and insurance status on pulmonary function in Hispanic patients with CF.
Healthcare-Related Contributing Factors
There is a high rate of medication non-adherence in CF, which reduces effectiveness. The treatment regimen is complex and time-consuming. Adherence is related to disease knowledge and understanding the medication38. Hispanic families potentially have greater barriers to adherence due to level of acculturation and language spoken. A pilot study found that parents of Hispanic patients with CF were more likely to have inadequate or marginal health literacy39. Parents with lower health literacy may take longer to learn about CF, medications, and treatments, which could differentially affect pulmonary function early in life while the parents are learning. In asthma, medication adherence is lowest in Hispanic patients40; ethnic differences in medication adherence may contribute to disparities in CF and should be studied further.
Improvements in pulmonary function in CF are attributable, at least in part, to new medications. However, these medications have not been sufficiently studied in Hispanic patients, as Hispanic patients were proportionally underrepresented, taking part in only 7.5% of studies41. When included, Hispanic patients comprised only 2% of patients, which is insufficient to investigate ethnic differences in drug response. There are risks to extrapolating trial results to Hispanic patients; as certain drugs are metabolized differently in non-Hispanic white patients compared to Hispanic patients42. The effect or use of CF drugs may be different in Hispanic patients, which could lead to lower pulmonary function early in life. Future CF drug studies should be designed and conducted in a manner to enroll enough Hispanic patients to not just represent the baseline CF population but to detect differences in drug response.
Biological Contributing Factors
Despite having a lower detection rate on newborn screen, Hispanic patients are diagnosed with CF at the same age or earlier as non-Hispanic white patients8; 10. Hispanic patients are diagnosed primarily from respiratory symptoms, which could possibly be from early respiratory infections. Non-Hispanic white infants with early respiratory symptoms have lower pulmonary function in childhood43. Early infections, such as Pseudomonas, negatively affect pulmonary function later in life44. Hispanic patients acquire Pseudomonas four years earlier than non-Hispanic white patients8; 10. Earlier acquisition of Pseudomonas may explain why Hispanic patients have lower pulmonary function by 6 years old. We found that Hispanic patients are more likely to have Pseudomonas overall, but less likely to have MRSA than non-Hispanic white patients, which may explain why we did not observe a different in FEV1 decline. Studies are needed to investigate the effect of other respiratory infections, such as atypical mycobacteria, viruses, and bacteria, on pulmonary function in Hispanic patients.
Hispanic patients are less likely to be treated with PERT, a marker of pancreatic insufficiency, which is associated with lower pulmonary function9. We found that there was a smaller gap in FEV1 percent predicted in patients not on PERT than those on PERT. We adjusted for being underweight, but there may be other nutritional differences in pancreatic insufficient Hispanic patients contributing to pulmonary function. Nutritional status is protective to pulmonary function in non-Hispanic white patients45; the effect of nutrition in Hispanic patients is not known. Early life nutrition may lead lower pulmonary function early in life but not change decline and needs to be investigated.
Even though CFTR mutation severity is a leading predictor of pulmonary function5 and Hispanic patients have a different distribution of CFTR mutations7; 8, we found that CFTR mutation severity did not explain the ethnic disparity in pulmonary function. Even when comparing patients who are F508del homozygous, Hispanic patients had lower pulmonary function indicating the disparity is driven by something other than CFTR mutations, such as modifier genes. CFTR and modifier genes are estimated to account for 50% of pulmonary function variability25. Modifier genes have not been studied specifically in Hispanic patients and may explain why Hispanics have lower pulmonary function early in life. A third of Hispanic patients have CFTR mutations with unclassified function, most rare or de novo7. Since pulmonary function decline is similar between ethnicities despite Hispanic patients being less likely to have severe mutations or F508del homozygote, many of these unclassified CFTR mutations likely lead to a non-functional CFTR channel and severe effects on pulmonary function. Further exploration of the function and effect of these unclassified mutations is needed, with particular focus on mutations in Hispanic patients.
Limitations
We recognize several limitations of our study. First, patients could have been misclassified as Hispanic or non-Hispanic white, which would underestimate the association of ethnicity with pulmonary function. This is unlikely to be a significant factor given that in the CFFPR, less than 2% of race and ethnicity was inaccurate11. Second, only the GLI and the CF-specific predictive equations were created using Hispanic individuals. The GLI has a predictive equation created from individuals in Europe, North America, and South American, including Latin American and Mexican American datasets12. None of the 3 sets of predictive equations have an equation specifically for Hispanic individuals only. The observed ethnic differences in pulmonary function may be an artifact of the predictive equations themselves; however, we found that Hispanic patients had lower pulmonary function in all 3 sets of equations. Third, only 81–84% of patients with CF in the U.S. are included in the CFPR11. CF continues to be under-recognized in Hispanic Americans and Hispanic patients are less likely to be diagnosed via newborn screen7. Hispanic patients with mild CF are more likely than non-Hispanic white patients to be misdiagnosed and thus may not be included in the CFFPR. Thus, our findings may be due to the CFPR not including Hispanic patients with mild disease. However, since the ethnic disparity exists in patients with CFTR Class I–III mutations, underrepresentation is less likely to explain the pulmonary function disparity.
Conclusion
Disparities in pulmonary function exist in Hispanic patients with CF early in life and then persist without improvement or worsening over time. It is valuable to investigate the factors contributing to pulmonary function in Hispanic patients with CF.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation for the use of CF Foundation Patient Registry data to conduct this study. Additionally, we would like to thank the patients, care providers, and clinic coordinators at CF Centers throughout the United States for their contributions to the CF Foundation Patient Registry.
This work was supported by the Cystic Fibrosis Research Institute [Grant MCGARR16A0]; the National Institutes of Health [Grants 5T32GM007546-35, P30-DK072517, 1R01HL117004, R01Hl128439, R01ES015794, 1R01MD010443, R21ES24844, 1P60MD006902, U54MD009523, 1R01MD010443, 24RT-0025, U10HL109146]; the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation [Grant A125817]; and the National Science Foundation [Grant A127937].
Abbreviation List
- BMI
Body Mass Index
- CF
Cystic Fibrosis
- CFFPR
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry
- CFRD
Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes
- CFTR
Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Receptor
- FEF25–75
Forced Expiratory Flow At 25%–75% Of FVC
- FEV1
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second
- FVC
Forced Vital Capacity
- GLI
Global Lung Initiative
- MRSA
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
- PERT
Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy
- SES
Socioeconomic Status
Footnotes
Some of the findings were presented at the American Thoracic Society International Conference in 2015.
The views expressed in this article do not communicate an official position of the authors’ institutions nor the National Institutes of Health.
This work was performed at the University of California San Francisco.
Author Contribution: Conception and design: MEM, NPL; Data analysis: MEM, JMN, NPL; Data interpretation: MEM, JMN, DWN, EGB, NPL; Drafting the manuscript for important intellectual content: MEM, JMN, DWN, EGB, NPL. All authors approve the final manuscript and are accountable for the work.
References
- 1.2014 annual data report. Bethesda, Maryland: 2015. Cystic fibrosis foundation patient registry. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Arias E. United states life tables by hispanic origin, 2010. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2010;152:1–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.O'Connor GT, Quinton HB, Kahn R, Robichaud P, Maddock J, Lever T, Detzer M, Brooks JG. Case - mix adjustment for evaluation of mortality in cystic fibrosis*. Pediatric pulmonology. 2002;33(2):99–105. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kerem E, Reisman J, Corey M, Canny GJ, Levison H. Prediction of mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 1992;326(18):1187–1191. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199204303261804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.De Gracia J, Mata F, Alvarez A, Casals T, Gatner S, Vendrell M, De la Rosa D, Guarner L, Hermosilla E. Genotype-phenotype correlation for pulmonary function in cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2005;60(7):558–563. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.031153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sugarman EA, Rohlfs EM, Silverman LM, Allitto BA. Cftr mutation distribution among us hispanic and african american individuals: Evaluation in cystic fibrosis patient and carrier screening populations. Genetics in Medicine. 2004;6(5):392–399. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000139503.22088.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Watts KD, Layne B, Harris A, McColley SA. Hispanic infants with cystic fibrosis show low cftr mutation detection rates in the illinois newborn screening program. Journal of genetic counseling. 2012;21(5):671–675. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9481-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Watts KD, Seshadri R, Sullivan C, McColley SA. Increased prevalence of risk factors for morbidity and mortality in the us hispanic cf population. Pediatric pulmonology. 2009;44(6):594–601. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schaedel C, De Monestrol I, Hjelte L, Johannesson M, Kornfält R, Lindblad A, Strandvik B, Wahlgren L, Holmberg L. Predictors of deterioration of lung function in cystic fibrosis. Pediatric pulmonology. 2002;33(6):483–491. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Buu MC, Sanders LM, Mayo J, Milla CE, Wise PH. Assessing differences in mortality rates and risk factors between hispanic and non-hispanic patients with cystic fibrosis in california. CHEST Journal. 2016;149(2):380–389. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-2189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Knapp EA, Fink AK, Goss CH, Sewall A, Ostrenga J, Dowd C, Elbert A, Petren KM, Marshall BC. The cystic fibrosis foundation patient registry: Design and methods of a national observational disease registry. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2016;13(7):1173–1179. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-781OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, Culver BH, Enright PL, Hankinson JL, Ip MS, Zheng J. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: The global lung function 2012 equations. European Respiratory Journal. 2012;40(6):1324–1343. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00080312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Neuhaus JM, Kalbfleisch JD. Between-and within-cluster covariate effects in the analysis of clustered data. Biometrics. 1998:638–645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Neuhaus JM, McCulloch CE. Separating between - and within - cluster covariate effects by using conditional and partitioning methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 2006;68(5):859–872. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schechter MS, Shelton BJ, Margolis PA, FitzSimmons SC. The association of socioeconomic status with outcomes in cystic fibrosis patients in the united states. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2001;163(6):1331–1337. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.6.9912100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Oates GR, Schechter MS. Socioeconomic status and health outcomes: Cystic fibrosis as a model. Expert review of respiratory medicine. 2016;10(9):967–977. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2016.1196140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S, Chideya S, Marchi KS, Metzler M, Posner S. Socioeconomic status in health research: One size does not fit all. Jama. 2005;294(22):2879–2888. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.22.2879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Guo SS, Wei R, Mei Z, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson CL. Cdc growth charts: United states. Advance data. 2000;(314):1–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.U.S. Census bureau. [accessed 2017];American FactFinder. https://factfinder.census.gov/help/en/region.htm.
- 20.Mendelsohn AB, Dreyer NA, Mattox PW, Su Z, Swenson A, Li R, Turner JR, Velentgas P. Characterization of missing data in clinical registry studies. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 2015;49(1):146–154. doi: 10.1177/2168479014532259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Royston P, White IR. Multiple imputation by chained equations (mice): Implementation in stata. Journal of Statistical Software. 2011;45(4):1–20. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general us population. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 1999;159(1):179–187. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9712108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang X, Dockery DW, Wypij D, Fay ME, Ferris BG. Pulmonary function between 6 and 18 years of age. Pediatric pulmonology. 1993;15(2):75–88. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950150204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kulich M, Rosenfeld M, Campbell J, Kronmal R, Gibson RL, Goss CH, Ramsey B. Disease-specific reference equations for lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2005;172(7):885–891. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200410-1335OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Collaco JM, Blackman SM, McGready J, Naughton KM, Cutting GR. Quantification of the relative contribution of environmental and genetic factors to variation in cystic fibrosis lung function. The Journal of pediatrics. 2010;157(5):802–807. e803. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Goss CH, Newsom SA, Schildcrout JS, Sheppard L, Kaufman JD. Effect of ambient air pollution on pulmonary exacerbations and lung function in cystic fibrosis. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2004;169(7):816–821. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200306-779OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Campbell PW, Parker RA, Roberts BT, Krishnamani M, Phillips JA. Association of poor clinical status and heavy exposure to tobacco smoke in patients with cystic fibrosis who are homozygous for the f508 deletion. The Journal of pediatrics. 1992;120(2):261–264. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80438-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Homa DM, Neff LJ, King BA, Caraballo RS, Bunnell RE, Babb SD, Garrett BE, Sosnoff CS, Wang L. Vital signs: Disparities in nonsmokers' exposure to secondhand smoke—united states, 1999–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(4):103–108. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Grineski S, Bolin B, Boone C. Criteria air pollution and marginalized populations: Environmental inequity in metropolitan phoenix, arizona*. Social Science Quarterly. 2007;88(2):535–554. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nishimura KK, Galanter JM, Roth LA, Oh SS, Thakur N, Nguyen EA, Thyne S, Farber HJ, Serebrisky D, Kumar R. Early-life air pollution and asthma risk in minority children. The gala ii and sage ii studies. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2013;188(3):309–318. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201302-0264OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gauderman WJ, Avol E, Gilliland F, Vora H, Thomas D, Berhane K, McConnell R, Kuenzli N, Lurmann F, Rappaport E. The effect of air pollution on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;351(11):1057–1067. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gauderman WJ, Urman R, Avol E, Berhane K, McConnell R, Rappaport E, Chang R, Lurmann F, Gilliland F. Association of improved air quality with lung development in children. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;372(10):905–913. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Traylor AH, Schmittdiel JA, Uratsu CS, Mangione CM, Subramanian U. Adherence to cardiovascular disease medications: Does patient-provider race/ethnicity and language concordance matter? Journal of general internal medicine. 2010;25(11):1172–1177. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1424-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fernandez A, Schillinger D, Warton EM, Adler N, Moffet HH, Schenker Y, Salgado MV, Ahmed A, Karter AJ. Language barriers, physician-patient language concordance, and glycemic control among insured latinos with diabetes: The diabetes study of northern california (distance) Journal of general internal medicine. 2011;26(2):170–176. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1507-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Leson S, Gershwin ME. Risk factors for asthmatic patients requiring intubation. I. Observations in children. Journal of Asthma. 1995;32(4):285–294. doi: 10.3109/02770909509044836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Berk ML, Schur CL, Chavez LR, Frankel M. Health care use among undocumented latino immigrants. Health Affairs. 2000;19(4):51–64. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.4.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Koinis-Mitchell D, Sato AF, Kopel SJ, McQuaid EL, Seifer R, Klein R, Esteban C, Lobato D, Ortega AN, Canino G. Immigration and acculturation-related factors and asthma morbidity in latino children. Journal of pediatric psychology. 2011;36(10):1130–1143. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsr041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Quittner AL, Drotar D, Ievers-Landis C, Slocum N, Seidner D, Jacobsen J. Adherence to medical treatments in adolescents with cystic fibrosis: The development and evaluation of family-based interventions. Promoting adherence to medical treatment in chronic childhood illness: Concepts, methods, and interventions. 2000:383–407. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kern AS, Watts KD, Rychlik K, McColley SA. Disparities in parental health literacy at a pediatric cystic fibrosis center. Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology. 2015;28(1):55–59. [Google Scholar]
- 40.McQuaid EL, Everhart RS, Seifer R, Kopel SJ, Mitchell DK, Klein RB, Esteban CA, Fritz GK, Canino G. Medication adherence among latino and non-latino white children with asthma. Pediatrics. 2012;129(6):e1404–e1410. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.McGarry ME, McColley SA. Minorities are underrepresented in clinical trials of pharmaceutical agents for cystic fibrosis. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2016;13(10):1721–1725. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201603-192BC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Burroughs VJ, Maxey RW, Levy RA. Racial and ethnic differences in response to medicines: Towards individualized pharmaceutical treatment. Journal of the National Medical Association. 2002;94(10 Suppl):1–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Beydon N, Amsallem F, Bellet M, Boulé M, Chaussain M, Denjean A, Matran R, Pin I, Alberti C, Gaultier C. Pulmonary function tests in preschool children with cystic fibrosis. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2002;166(8):1099–1104. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200205-421OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kosorok MR, Zeng L, West SE, Rock MJ, Splaingard ML, Laxova A, Green CG, Collins J, Farrell PM. Acceleration of lung disease in children with cystic fibrosis after pseudomonas aeruginosa acquisition. Pediatric pulmonology. 2001;32(4):277–287. doi: 10.1002/ppul.2009.abs. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Konstan MW, Butler SM, Wohl MEB, Stoddard M, Matousek R, Wagener JS, Johnson CA, Morgan WJ, Fibrosis ICotESoC Growth and nutritional indexes in early life predict pulmonary function in cystic fibrosis. The Journal of pediatrics. 2003;142(6):624–630. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2003.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]