Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2017 Nov 20;12(11):e0188322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188322

Supraglottic squamous cell carcinomas have distinctive clinical features and prognosis based on subregion

Weiquan Ding 1,2,#, Tianrun Liu 3,#, Jiangang Liang 1,2,*, Tingbao Hu 1,2, Shaoyun Cui 1,2, Guorong Zou 1,2, Weiwei Cai 1,2, Ankui Yang 4,5,*
Editor: Gabriele Multhoff6
PMCID: PMC5695779  PMID: 29155864

Abstract

Objective

To analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of patients with squamous cell carcinoma localized to different supraglottic subregions.

Methods

Clinicopathologic data were reviewed retrospectively for 111 patients with supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma who were diagnosed between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2005 and were initially treated with surgery. DNA from human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and (or /and) HPV 18 were detected in all the 111 supraglottic carcinoma specimens using in situ hybridization. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, factors were compared using log-rank test, and prognostic factors were determined using Cox proportional hazards model. The relationship between subregions and clinicopathologic factors was analyzed using Chi-square tests.

Results

HPV prevalence differed between patients with aryepiglottic fold carcinoma and ventricle carcinoma (P < .05). The local-regional control rates, overall survival rates or cancer specific survival rates were significantly different between different subregions. Univariate analysis indicated that pTNM classification, pN spread, and subregion were associated with prognosis (P < .05). Multivariate analysis indicated that pTNM classification and subregion were associated with supraglottic carcinoma prognosis. The survival rate was better for patients with carcinoma of the epiglottis or ventricular bands compared to those with carcinoma in the aryepiglottic fold or ventricle (P = .012).

Conclusions

Subregion may be a new prognostic factor for supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma. Different supraglottic carcinoma subregions have distinct clinical features such as HPV expression, lymph node metastasis rate, local-regional control and prognosis. Therefore, it is necessary to subdivide supraglottic squamous cell carcinomas into several subregion groups to individualize therapy.

Introduction

Laryngeal carcinoma is one of the most common malignancies of the head and neck [1, 2]. Supraglottic carcinoma is the dominant laryngeal tumor, especially in some developing countries where alcohol and smoking are the most common risk factors [2, 3]. Patients with supraglottic carcinoma often present with non-specific throat pain, dysphagia, and neck lymphadenopathy as the primary disease features. These patients tend to present for care at an advanced stage and have poor overall survival [4, 5]. The supraglottic laryngeal region includes the epiglottis, ventricular bands, aryepiglottic fold (laryngeal aspect), and laryngeal ventricle, each of which serves a distinct anatomic purpose [6]. Until now, it has been unclear whether clinical features and prognosis differ based on carcinoma subregion.

In this study, supraglottic carcinoma was divided into four sub-types based on subregion: epiglottis, ventricular bands, aryepiglottic fold (laryngeal aspect), and laryngeal ventricle. Differences in clinicopathologic characteristics, HPV presence, and survival were then compared by subregion.

Materials and methods

Clinical data

The clinicopathologic data were analyzed retrospectively for 111 patients with supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma who were diagnosed between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2005 and were initially treated with surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center / Panyu Central Hospital (Table 1). We divided supraglottic squamous cell carcinomas into four types based on subregion: epiglottis, ventricular bands, aryepiglottic fold, and ventricle. The tumor location and diagnosis were established using clinical examination, fibro-laryngoscope, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, intraoperative exploration, and postoperative histopathologic report. All patients underwent surgery for the primary lesion and selective or therapeutic neck dissection. Postoperative radiotherapy is advised in case of cartilage invasion, positive surgical margins, T3 or T4 tumors, advanced nodal disease (e.g. N2c/N3) with extracapsular invasion. Patients at high-risk for recurrence received post-operative radiotherapy based on NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) guidelines at a mean dose of 60 Gy (range, 40 Gy to 70 Gy). Three patients who developed distant metastases after surgery received chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil. Clinicopathologic features are shown in Table 1. Pathologic diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma was confirmed by two experienced pathologists.

Table 1. Univariate factors influencing prognosis of supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma.

Variable Epiglottis Ventricular bands Aryepiglottic fold Ventricle of larynx P
Sex
 Men 25 22 26 33 0.858
 Women 2 1 1 1
Age
 <60 years 10 14 14 12 0.184
 ≥60 years 17 9 13 22
pT stage
 T1 2 0 1 1 0.431
 T2 9 11 6 11
 T3 13 9 11 13
 T4 3 3 9 9
pN stage
 N0 13 16 17 28 0.119
 N1 6 2 6 2
 N2 8 5 4 4
 N3 0 0 0 0
pTNM stage
 Stage I 2 0 1 1 0.588
 Stage II 5 8 3 11
 Stage III 11 8 13 11
 Stage IV 9 7 10 11
Histology grade
 G1 10 9 6 12 0.260
 G2 9 11 14 19
 G3 8 3 7 3
Surgery type
 Supraglottic laryngectomy 1 3 1 1 0.000
 Horizontal hemilaryngectomy 12 1 5 0
 Vertical hemilaryngectomy 0 7 0 11
 Frontolateral laryngectomy 2 0 0 0
 Total laryngectomy 12 12 21 22
R1 resection
 Yes 5 5 6 6 0.964
 No 22 18 21 28
Treatment modality
 S 18 11 17 19 0.532
 S+R 9 12 9 13
 S+C 0 0 1 2
Neck metastasis
 Yes 13 16 17 28 0.042
 No 14 7 10 6

S, Surgery; R, Post-operative radiation therapy; C, Post-operative chemotherapy; R1 resection was defined when the distance of the tumour from the resection margin was less or equal 1 mm.

All patients were provided informed consent at the time of diagnosis between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2005 for study participation using medical records and clinicopathologic data. Written ethics approval was obtained from the Hospital Research Ethics Committee of Panyu Central Hospital and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.

Detection of human papillomavirus using in situ hybridization

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 111 patients were sectioned serially at 5 mm thickness. After de-paraffinization, in situ hybridization (ISH) was used to detect HPV. Samples were hybridized with a biotinylated whole-genomic DNA probe mixture of HPV 16 and 18 (ISH-5121, Beijing Zhongshan Jingqiao Company, China). Cervical carcinoma was used as an ISH positive control and a reverse HPV probe in the hybridization mix was used as an ISH negative control. The experiments were performed from August 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011.

Follow-up

Follow-up data were obtained by outpatient chart review and telephone interview during the period from the date of first treatment to December 31, 2013. The tumor-based end points included local-regional control, cancer-specific survival and overall survival.

Statistical analysis

The data was analyzed using SPSS 16.0 software. Survival analysis was undertaken by Kaplan-Meier analysis; factors were compared using log-rank test, and multivariate analysis was carried out using Cox proportional hazards model (backwards-selection method). The relationship between different factors was analyzed using chi-square tests. P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinicopathologic characteristics of supraglottic carcinoma subregions

Lymph node metastasis rates were 48.1%, 69.6%, 63.0%, and 82.4%, respectively, for supraglottic squamous cell carcinomas of the epiglottis, ventricular bands, aryepiglottic fold, and ventricle. Although lymph node metastasis rates differed between subregions (P = .042), there were no correlations between subregion and age, sex, or histologic grade (Table 2). The incidence of R1-resection was 14.4% (16/111).

Table 2. Correlation between clinical factors and supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma subregions.

Variable χ2 P
Sex 0.764 0.858
Age 4.837 0.184
Histologic grade 7.713 0.260
Surgery type 50.178 0.000
Treatment modality 5.091 0.532
Neck lymph nodes metastasis 8.815 0.042

HPV presence by supraglottic carcinoma subregion

HPV was detected in 16 of 111 patients (14.4%) by ISH, but there was no correlation between HPV status and subregion (Table 3). When HPV status was compared for each pair of subregions, only the aryepiglottic fold and ventricle differed (χ2 = 50.565, P < .05).

Table 3. Clinicopathologic features for 111 patients with supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma and human papillomavirus.

Variable Cases HPV (-)
N = 95 (85.6%)
HPV (+)
N = 16 (14.4%)
P
N1 % N2 %
Subregions 0.082
 Epiglottis 27 23 85.2 4 14.8
 Ventricular bands 23 19 82.6 4 17.4
 Aryepiglottic fold 27 20 74.1 7 25.9
 Ventricle 34 33 97.1 1 2.9

Local-regional control rate

At the last follow-up date of December 31, 2013, 67 patients had local-regional recurrence. Subgroups differed with respect to local-regional control rate (χ2 = 9.235, P = .026) (Fig 1). The local-regional control rates of carcinoma from epiglottis or ventricular bands was better than that of carcinoma from aryepiglottic fold or ventricle (Fig 1). Carcinoma subregion was correlated with local-regional recurrence (Table 4).

Fig 1. Local-regional control rate for patients with supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma, by subregion.

Fig 1

Table 4. Local-regional control rate of 111 patients with supraglottic carcinoma.

Subregions Cases 2-year (%) 5-year (%) P
Epiglottis 27 70.4 59.3 0.026
Ventricular bands 23 78.3 78.3
Aryepiglottic fold 27 70.4 37.0
Ventricle 34 52.9 38.2

Survival

At the last follow-up date of December 31, 2013, seven patients were lost to follow-up, and all patients had been followed for at least 2 years (median, 64 months). The overall survival rate was 42.3%, and 43 patients experienced tumor relapse (10 in primary site, 26 in cervical lymph nodes, two in primary site plus cervical lymph nodes, and three in distant site). Subregions were correlated with overall survival (Table 1). Subgroups differed with respect to cancer-specific survival (χ2 = 10.042, P = .018) and overall survival (χ2 = 10.526, P = .015) (Figs 2 and 3).

Fig 2. Cancer-specific survival for patients with supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma, by subregion.

Fig 2

Fig 3. Overall survival for patients with supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma, by subregion.

Fig 3

Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors

To determine which factors affect survival of patients with supraglottic carcinoma, possible prognostic factors of sex, age, subregion, stage, histologic grade, lymph node metastasis, surgery type, and treatment modality were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate regression analysis. Results from the univariate analysis showed that subregion, pN spread, and TNM classification were significantly correlated with overall survival (Table 5). Multivariate analysis results indicated that subregion and pTNM classification were independent prognostic factors affecting survival (Table 6).

Table 5. Factors influencing prognosis of patients with supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma.

Variables Cases 5-year overall Survival rates χ2 P
Sex 0.498 0.48
 Men 106 41.5
 Women 5 60.0
Age 0.049 0.824
 <60 years 50 44.0
 ≥60 years 61 41.0
Subregion 11.049. 0.012
 Epiglottis 27 51.9
 Ventricular bands 23 60.9
 Aryepiglottic fold 27 25.9
 Ventricle of larynx 34 35.3
pTstage 7.325 0.062
 T1 4 75.0
 T2 37 48.6
 T3 46 41.3
 T4 24 29.2
pN stage 8.614 0.013
 N0 74 45.9
 N1 16 50.0
 N2 21 23.8
 N3 0 0
pTNM stage 10.880 0.012
 Stage I 4 75.0
 Stage II 27 51.9
 Stage III 43 46.5
 Stage IV 37 27.0
Histology grade 0.557 0.757
 G1 37 43.2
 G2 53 39.6
 G3 21 47.5
Surgery type 7.386 0.117
 Partial supraglottic laryngectomy 6 16.7
 Horizontal hemilaryngectomy 18 50.0
 Vertical hemilaryngectomy 18 61.1
 Frontolateral laryngectomy 2 50.0
 Total laryngectomy 67 37.3
Treatment modality 0.127 0.939
 Surgery 65 43.1
 Post-op RT treatment 43 41.9
 Post-op chemotherapy 3 33.3
Neck lymph nodes metastasis 2.961 0.085
 Yes 37 35.1
 No 74 45.9

Table 6. Factors influencing prognosis of supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma in multivariate analysis.

Factors B SE Wald P Exp (B) 95.0% CI for Exp (B)
pTNM 0.455 0.199 5.216 0.022 1.576 (1.067–2.329)
Subregion 0.265 0.131 4.075 0.044 1.304 (1.008–1.687)

Discussion

This study showed no differences with respect to patient age or sex, tumor histologic grade, or treatment modality and supraglottic carcinoma subregion. However, prognosis was better for patients with carcinoma of the epiglottis and ventricular bands compared to the aryepiglottic fold or ventricle, with survival rates of 51.9%, 60.9%, 25.9%, and 35.3%, respectively (P = .012). Because epiglottal and ventricular band carcinoma tend to grow anteriorly or downward and do not invade deep tissues until late in the disease, patients with these tumors may have better survival.

The supraglottic laryngeal region includes the epiglottis, ventricular bands, aryepiglottic fold (laryngeal aspect), and laryngeal ventricle, each of which serves a distinct anatomic purpose. For the purpose of tumor resection and function preservation, the surgical methods for carcinoma in each subregion is different, therefore, there appeared differences in the baseline distribution of surgical method between the different subregions, however, that might not lead to statistical bias. Patients with carcinoma of the epiglottis or aryepiglottic fold commonly undergo resection by horizontal hemi-laryngectomy or total laryngectomy, whereas those with carcinoma of the ventricular band or ventricle carcinoma usually undergo vertical hemi-laryngectomy or total laryngectomy [79]. There is a relatively wider space for epiglottal tumor growth before invasion to other subregions; thus, successful resection may be more feasible. Because the ventricular band and ventricle subregions are more limited in size, carcinomas in these two subregions may extend earlier in the longitudinal direction. Most patients with ventricular band or ventricle carcinoma had a poor prognosis, with stage III (43 of 111) or stage IV (37 of 111) disease at diagnosis. In this study, subgroups differed with respect to local-regional control rate (P < .05). The local-regional control rates of carcinoma in epiglottis or ventricular bands was better than that in aryepiglottic fold or ventricle, therefore, carcinoma in different subregions might present different local-regional rate after treatment.

There were also differences in neck lymph node metastasis rates between supraglottic carcinoma subregions (P = .045). Carcinomas of the aryepiglottic fold (37.0%) and epiglottis (51.9%) more often metastasized to neck lymph nodes than did carcinomas of the ventricular bands (30.4%) or ventricles (17.6%); this spread is due to the higher density of micro-lymphatic nets in aryepiglottic fold and epiglottis than that in the ventricular bands or ventricles.

As reported previously, HPV detection rates range from 26% to 44% in laryngeal cancers [10]. HPV 16 and 18 are detected at high levels in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. HPV 16 accounts for 86.7% of the HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas, whereas HPV 18 accounts for only 2.9%. For HPV-positive oral squamous cell carcinomas, HPV 16 is found in 68.7% and HPV 18 is found in 34.5%. In all the HPV-positive laryngeal cancer cases, HPV 16 is detected in 69.2% of the cases and HPV 18 is detected in 17.2% of the cases. HPV-positivity rates are lower for squamous cell carcinomas of other areas of the head and neck [11].

HPV expression levels also differ by laryngeal subregion. Almadori et al found the HPV-positivity rate to be much higher in supraglottic carcinoma compared to other laryngeal areas [12]. For HPV-positive laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, positivity rates are 60.6%, 36.4%, and 3.0% for the supraglottic, glottic, and subglottic regions, respectively [13]. HPV infection may be significantly correlated with laryngeal carcinoma subregion but not with clinical stage, lymph node metastasis, or tumor grade [13]. In our research, HPV expression was 14.7%; however, HPV expression was higher in ventricular band (25.9%), epiglottis (14.8%), and aryepiglottic fold (17.4%) carcinoma compared to ventricle carcinoma (2.9%). HPV expression differed between aryepiglottic fold and ventricle carcinoma (P = .008). Compared to ventricle carcinoma, other areas had higher HPV detection rates; those three subregions are nearer to the oropharynx, where carcinomas tend to have higher HPV expression rates [14]. Because supraglottic carcinomas require different surgical approaches based on subregion, HPV positivity, and prognosis, these tumors should be categorized by subregion to individualize therapy.

Demographic and clinical characteristics have been studied extensively with respect to prognosis of laryngeal carcinoma. As with previous studies, [4, 15, 16] demographic data such as age and sex were not associated with prognosis in our study. Raitiola and colleagues showed that T stage and cervical lymph node metastases are independent prognostic factors for laryngeal carcinoma [17]. Likewise, Santos et al found that T stage, N stage, clinical stage, and extracapsular lymph node spread were related to prognosis, with lymph node metastases independently affecting prognosis [18]. Similarly, Vlachtsis et al showed that T stage, N spread, TNM classification, and tumor site affect prognosis, with TNM classification independently predicting prognosis [19]. However, no studies to date have evaluated the significance of laryngeal carcinoma subregions in prognosis. In our study, carcinoma subregion, pN spread, and pTNM classification had prognostic significance in univariate analysis, with subregion and pTNM classification as independent predictors of prognosis.

Our study showed that different subregions of supraglottic carcinoma were associated with distinct clinical features such as HPV expression, lymph node metastasis rate, local-regional control and prognosis. Therefore, supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma should be considered as distinct subtypes corresponding to their subregions of origin so that patients can receive individualized therapy. However, some risk factors like alcohol and smoking are not included in the analysis due to the incomplete data, which may affect the results, and the number of cases in this study is relatively small, further studies would be needed to confirm that different subregions of supraglottic carcinoma show distinct clinical features.

Supporting information

S1 Dataset. Data subtype brief for PLOS 2011.

(XLSX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81272955 and 81302368) to Ankui Yang, the Guangdong Province Natural Science Foundation (grant number 2015A030313058) to Tianrun Liu and (grant number 2014A020212100) to Ankui Yang, and the Guangdong Province Science and technology Foundation (grant number 2011B031800313040) to Tianrun Liu. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Mourad WF, Hu KS, Shourbaji RA, Dolan J, Blakaj DM, Shasha D, et al. Exploration of the role of radiotherapy in the management of early glottic cancer with complete carotid artery occlusion. Onkologie 2013;36(7–8):433–435. doi: 10.1159/000353750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Peller M, Katalinic A, Wollenberg B, Teudt IU, Meyer JE. Epidemiology of laryngeal carcinoma in Germany, 1998–2011. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies 2016;273(6):1481–1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Koirala K. Epidemiological Study of Laryngeal Carcinoma in Western Nepal. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP 2015;16(15):6541–6544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Smee RI, De-loyde KJ, Broadley K, Williams JR. Prognostic factors for supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma: Importance of the unfit patient. Head & neck 2013;35(7):949–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ganly I, Patel SG, Matsuo J, Singh B, Kraus DH, Boyle J, et al. Predictors of outcome for advanced-stage supraglottic laryngeal cancer. Head & neck 2009;31(11):1489–1495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mor N, Blitzer A. Functional Anatomy and Oncologic Barriers of the Larynx. Otolaryngologic clinics of North America 2015;48(4):533–545. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2015.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jones TM, De M, Foran B, Harrington K, Mortimore S. Laryngeal cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary guidelines. The Journal of laryngology and otology 2016;130(S2):S75–S82. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116000487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Peretti G, Piazza C, Mora F, Garofolo S, Guastini L. Reasonable limits for transoral laser microsurgery in laryngeal cancer. Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery 2016;24(2):135–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Subspecialty Group of Head Neck Surgery EBoCJoOH. Expert agreements on general priciples of surgical and multidisciplinary treatments of laryngeal cancer. Zhonghua er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery 2014;49(8):620–626. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ragin CC, Taioli E. Survival of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in relation to human papillomavirus infection: review and meta-analysis. International journal of cancer 2007;121(8):1813–1820. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22851 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kreimer AR, Clifford GM, Boyle P, Franceschi S. Human papillomavirus types in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas worldwide: a systematic review. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention: a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2005;14(2):467–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Almadori G, Cadoni G, Cattani P, Posteraro P, Scarano E, Ottaviani F, et al. Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma by polymerase chain reaction. European journal of cancer 1996;32A(5):783–788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Morshed K. Association between human papillomavirus infection and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of medical virology 2010;82(6):1017–1023. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mehanna H, Beech T, Nicholson T, El-Hariry I, McConkey C, Paleri V, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal and nonoropharyngeal head and neck cancer—systematic review and meta-analysis of trends by time and region. Head & neck 2013;35(5):747–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Boffetta P, Merletti F, Faggiano F, Migliaretti G, Ferro G, Zanetti R, et al. Prognostic factors and survival of laryngeal cancer patients from Turin, Italy. A population-based study. American journal of epidemiology 1997;145(12):1100–1105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jin YT, Kayser S, Kemp BL, Ordonez NG, Tucker SL, Clayman GL, et al. The prognostic significance of the biomarkers p21WAF1/CIP1, p53, and bcl-2 in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 1998;82(11):2159–2165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Raitiola H, Wigren T, Pukander J. Radiotherapy outcome and prognostic factors in early glottic carcinoma. Auris, nasus, larynx 2000;27(2):153–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Santos CR, Kowalski LP, Magrin J, Fogaroli RC, Santos JC, Sabóia MV, et al. Prognostic factors in supraglottic carcinoma patients treated by surgery or radiotherapy. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology 1998;107(8):697–702. doi: 10.1177/000348949810700812 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vlachtsis K, Nikolaou A, Markou K, Fountzilas G, Daniilidis I. Clinical and molecular prognostic factors in operable laryngeal cancer. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies 2005;262(11):890–898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Dataset. Data subtype brief for PLOS 2011.

(XLSX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES