Skip to main content
World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery logoLink to World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
. 2016 Dec 22;2(4):208–213. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2016.11.003

Deep neck space infection – A retrospective study of 270 cases at tertiary care center

Atishkumar B Gujrathi 1,, Vijayalaxmi Ambulgekar 1, Pallavi Kathait 1
PMCID: PMC5698542  PMID: 29204568

Abstract

Objective

To review the clinical findings in deep neck infections and identification predisposing factors of these complications.

Methods

In this study, 270 patients with deep neck infections were studied retrospectively, study conducted in the Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Dr. Shankarrao Chavan Government Medical College, Nanded, Maharashtra, India, from March 2013 to March 2016.

Results

Analysis showed that males are most likely to have deep neck space infections (DNSI). Odontogenic and tonsillar causes were the more frequent ones. Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus species were the microorganisms more commonly isolated.

Conclusion

DNSI remains a common and challenging disease for otorhinolaryngologists, and should be treated on emergency basis. In developing countries, lack of adequate nutrition, poor oral hygiene, tobacco chewing, smoking and beetle nut chewing has led to an increased prevalence of dental and periodontal diseases. In present study, Odontogenic infections were the most common etiological factor for DNSI.

Keywords: Deep neck space infection, Incision and drainage, Odontogenic infections, Tracheotomy

Introduction

Infections of the deep spaces of the neck often present a true clinical challenge. Although antibiotics have reduced their incidence, deep neck space infections (DNSI) remain a relevant health problem. The complex anatomic organization of the neck makes diagnosis and precise localization of deep neck infections difficult. Clinical suspicion remains critical in that many deep neck infections are not evident on palpation or visual inspection.

The deep neck spaces that run the entire length of the neck include the retropharyngeal space, the danger space, the prevertebral space and the visceral vascular space. The spaces limited to above the hyoid include the submandibular space, the parapharyngeal space, the peritonsillar space, the masticator space, the temporal space and the parotid space. The only potential space limited to below the hyoid is the anterior visceral space. This area is enclosed by the middle layer of the deep cervical fascia and contains the thyroid gland, esophagus and trachea.1, 2, 3, 4

DNSI refers to an infection in the potential spaces and fascial planes of the neck, either with abscess formation or cellulitis.5 DNSI are bacterial infections originating from the upper aero-digestive tract and involving the deep neck spaces.6 The most common primary sources of DNSI are the dentition, tonsils, salivary glands and retained foreign bodies. DNSI often occur following preceding infections such as dental caries, tonsillitis, pharyngitis, trauma to the head and neck, or among intravenous drug abusers. Infections originating from teeth or their supporting structures, known as odontogenic infections, are among the most common diseases in the oral and maxillofacial region, especially in developing countries. Previously, before the advent of antibiotics, tonsillar and peritonsillar infections were the source of infection in 70% cases of DNSI7; but now the most common cause is considered to be dental in origin.8 DNSI are usually polymicrobial in nature. Streptococci, Peptostreptococcus species, Staphylococcus aureus, and anaerobes are the most commonly cultured organisms from DNSI.9, 10 Clinical manifestations of DNSI depend on the spaces involved, and include pain, fever, malaise, fatigue, swelling, odynophagia, dysphagia, trismus, dysphonia, otalgia, and dyspnea.11

Potentially life-threatening complications have been reported to occur at a rate of 10%–20%, even in recent literature on DNSI cases.12, 13 Common and potentially life-threatening complications include airway obstruction, jugular vein thrombosis, descending mediastinitis, pericarditis, pleural empyema, cavernous sinus thrombosis, sepsis, respiratory distress, disseminated intra-vascular coagulation,4 pleuropulmonary suppuration, and hematogenous dissemination to distant organs.14 Treatment of DNSI includes antibiotic therapy, airway management and surgical intervention. Management of DNSI is traditionally based on prompt surgical drainage of the abscess followed by antibiotics or nonsurgical treatment using appropriate antibiotics in the case of cellulitis.15 Proper diagnosis and prompt management can effectively overcome the disease and provide a cure without complications. However, for this, otorhinolaryngologists must have detailed knowledge of the presentation, etiology, investigations and access to appropriate medical and surgical interventions. The main aim of our study was to share our experience in terms of presentation, clinical trends, common sites involved, bacteriology, management, complications, and outcomes.

Material and methods

Trial design

This is a retrospective study conducted in the Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Dr. Shankarrao Chavan Government Medical College, Nanded, Maharashtra, India. After taking approval from local ethical committee, study was conducted and patients from March 2013 to March 2016, last three years studied retrospectively.

Participants

The study population comprised of patients with DNSI reporting to the facility and satisfying the following inclusion criteria: symptomatology of DNSI and all age groups. Those patients with post traumatic infected wound and wound secondary to malignancy were excluded from the study.

A total of 270 cases of DNSI met our inclusion criteria. Patients of all age groups and both genders were included. All parameters including age, gender, co-morbidities, symptoms, site involved, bacteriology, culture growth, type of intervention required, complications, and outcome were studied. All patients were initiated on treatment with amoxicillin, clavulanate, and metronidazole; the treatment regimen was later modified based on a culture and sensitivity report. After routine hematological investigations like CBC, RBS, Serum Creatinine were done, in few cases specific investigations like montoux test or histopathological testing of granulations or fine needle aspiration cytology, ultrasonography and X-rays were done as a imaging studies were done wherever necessary. Patients were subjected to incision and drainage under local anesthesia except in infants and children below 6 yrs of age require sedation.

Results

In our study, male preponderance was seen which was about 57.04% (154/270) and females were 42.96% (116/270).

Patients from births to age 70 yrs and above were included in the study. Majority of patients were seen in third decade of life (21.85%) which is followed by fourth decade (18.15%). While we found that there were slight increase in occurrence was seen in seventh decade of life i.e. 16.30% (Table 1).

Table 1.

Distribution of age in patients with DNSI (n = 270).

Age (yrs) Number of patients Percentage
0–10 41 15.19%
11–20 35 12.96%
21–30 59 21.85%
31–40 49 18.15%
41–50 7 2.59%
51–60 26 9.63%
61–70 44 16.30%
70 above 9 3.33%
Total 270 100%

DNSI: deep neck space infection.

Most common presenting complaints were throbbing type of pain and is seen in 81.48% of patients, followed by neck swelling (77.78%), difficulty in swallowing (39.26%), ear ache and restricted mouth opening of about 31.11% and 30.37% respectively (Table 2).

Table 2.

Symptomatology in patients with DNSI (n = 270).

Symptoms Number of patients Percentage
Pain 220 81.48%
Neck swelling 210 77.78%
Difficulty in swallowing 106 39.26%
Pain while swallowing 78 28.89%
Restricted neck movements 32 11.85%
Toothache 65 24.07%
Airway difficulty 5 1.85%
Ear ache 84 31.11%
Restricted mouth opening 82 30.37%

Regarding etiology of DNSI, odontogenic infections in the form of carious teeth were the most common etiological factor and found in about 24.07% of patients which is followed by Suppurative lymphadenopathy (21.49%), salivary gland infections and tonsillopharyngitis both of about 13.33%. Deep neck infections due to foreign body impaction is seen in only one case of retropharyngeal abscess, where a fish bone was impacted in posterior pharyngeal wall. 10.37% of patients were of tuberculous lymphadenopathy and all patients were presented with either matted lymphnode in neck or asymptomatic cold abscess (Table 3).

Table 3.

Etiological factors in patients with DNSI (n = 270).

Etiology Number of patients Percentage
Odontogenic 65 24.07%
Tonsillopharyngitis 36 13.33%
Furunculosis 4 1.48%
Suppurative lymphadenopathy 58 21.49%
Tuberculous lymphadenopathy 28 10.37%
Salivary gland infections 36 13.33%
Infected cysts 16 5.93%
Complicated otitis media 20 7.41%
Foreign body 1 0.37%
Unknown 6 2.22%
Total 270 100%

Ludwig's angina is the most common presentations amongst all DNSI and is seen in 17.78% of patients. This is followed by submandibular abscess (13.33%) and peritonsillar abscess (12.59%). These three conditions were mostly due to odontogenic in origin. Cold abscess were seen in 9.26% of the patients and they were found in anterior and posterior triangles of the neck. Mastoid abscess were seen in about 7.41% of patients and were mostly subperiosteal at post aural region and were due to complications of attico-antral type of unsafe chronic suppurative otitis media (Table 4).

Table 4.

Locations of abscesses in patients with DNSI (n = 270).

Site of presentations Number of patients Percentage
Ludwig's angina 48 17.78%
Peritonsillar abscess 34 12.59%
Periapical abscess 15 5.56%
Submandibular abscess 36 13.33%
Parapharyngeal abscess 7 2.59%
Retropharyngeal abscess 5 1.85%
Parotid abscess 26 9.63%
Masticator space abscess 2 0.74%
Anterior triangle neck abscess 34 12.59%
Posterior triangle neck abscess 18 6.67%
Cold abscess 25 9.26%
Mastoid abscess 20 7.41%
Total 270 100%

In our study, Streptococcus pyogenes and viridance were found to be major causative organism and was seen in 30.37% and 12.96% of patients accounting for 43.33% of patients followed by S. aureus (22.97%). Negative cultures were also seen in 10.74% of patients (Table 5).

Table 5.

Bacteriology in patients with DNSI (n = 270).

Micro-organisms Number of patients Percentage
Staphylococcus aureus 62 22.97%
Streptococcus pyogenes 82 30.37%
Streptococcus viridance 35 12.96%
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 11 4.07%
Bacteroides 23 8.52%
Klebsiella pneumonia 4 1.48%
Peptostreptococcus 21 7.78%
Escherichia coli 3 1.11%
Negative cultures 29 10.74%
Total 270 100%

Table 6 shows that majority of patients were smoker (39.63%), drinkers (24.81%) and tobacco chewer (24.44%). Amongst major associated illnesses diabetes mellitus was the most common and is found in 36.30% of patients and hypertension in 24.44% of patients. This is might be the cause for second height in occurrence in seventh decade of life.

Table 6.

Addictions and associated disorders in patients with DNSI (n = 270).

Addictions/Disorders Number of patients Percentage
Chronic smoker 107 39.63%
Chronic drinker 67 24.81%
Chronic tobacco chewer 89 32.96%
Hypertension 66 24.44%
Diabetes 98 36.30%
HIV 10 3.70%
Heart disease 12 4.44%
Pneumopathy 37 13.70%
Pregnancy 4 1.48%

Incision and drainage is the modality of treatment in DNSI and was done in 94.81% of patients along with treatment of etiological factors like tooth extraction (24.07%), mastoidectomy (7.41%), debridement were done in cases of necrotizing fasciitis and diabetic post intervention wounds (7.78%) and tracheostomy was needed in only two cases of DNSI (Table 7).

Table 7.

Treatment in patients with DNSI (n = 270).

Treatment Number of patients Percentage
Incision and drainage 148 54.81%
Incision, drainage and debridement 21 7.78%
Incision, drainage and mastoidectomy 20 7.41%
Incision, drainage and teeth extraction 65 24.07%
Incision, drainage and tracheostomy 2 0.74%
Conservative 14 5.19%
Total 270 100%

Conservative line of management in the form of broad spectrum antibiotics for a period of atleast one week, analgesics, anti inflammatory drugs and hydration were given in 5.19% of patients of suppurative lymphadenitis not forming abscess and cellulitis. In cold abscess and tuberculous lymphadenitis, antitubercular treatment (category I) was started for six month along with small incision and drainage or wide bore needle aspiration were done wherever required (Table 7).

Discussion

The widespread use of antibiotics has decreased the incidence of DNSI, but it remains a fairly common problem. In our study, 270 DNSI patients were included and all were admitted to the hospital for treatment. The management and diagnosis of DNSI is still a challenge for otorhinolaryngologists. In our study, the majority of patients were seen in their third and fourth decade of life. This correlates with the studies by Parischar and Harel8 and Meher et al16 in which 50% and 60% patients were in the third and fourth decade of life, respectively. In our study, a male predominance was seen i.e. 57.04%, which is consistent with studies by Sethi and Stanley,17 Meher et al16 and Parischar and Harel8 all of which showed male preponderance. Our study is consistent with those of Bakir et al,12 Meher et al,16 Sethi and Stanley17 and Marioni et al18 with pain as the most common symptom followed by swelling, dysphagia/odynophagia, and trismus. In a study by Tschiassny19 70% of cases of DNSI were odontogenic in origin. In a retrospective study by Parischar and Harel8 odontogenic infections were declared as the most common cause of DNSI (43%). Bottin et al20 also reported similar results to Parischar and Harel8 with 42% of DNSI due to odontogenic origin. Huang et al,10 Marioni et al18 and Eftekharian et al21 reported that odontogenic problems were the most common causative factor for DNSI, in 42%, 38.8% and 49% cases, respectively. Studies by Sethi and Stanley17 and Har-El et al22 also showed the major cause of DNSI to be dental in origin. Thus, our study results i.e. 24.07%, are consistent with those of these previous studies. The most common presentation of DNSI in our study was Ludwig's angina (17.78%), followed by submandibular abscess (13.33%), peritonsillar abscess (12.59%), anterior neck abscess (12.59%), cold abscess (9.26%). Ludwig's angina, peritonsillar abscess, and anterior neck abscess accounted for approximately 42.96% of our cases, which is consistent with the study by Khode et al23 with about 60% cases with a similar presentation. Peritonsillar abscess and submandibular abscess were the second and third most common presentation in our study, which correlates with study results from Pariscar et al9 and Stalfor et al24 with peritonsillar and submandibular as the second and third most common presentation. Further, in our study, diabetes was associated with 36.30% patients, which is same as compared with the study of Huang et al10 which reported 30.3% patients of diabetes mellitus. Eighty nine (32.96%) of our patients were tobacco chewers. This results in poor oral hygiene and is reported to affect the host's vulnerability to systemic diseases by the formation of subgingival biofilms acting as reservoirs of Gramnegative bacteria, and through the periodontium acting as a reservoir of inflammatory mediators.25 Streptococcus species were the most common cultured organism in our study, which is consistent with the studies of Ridder et al,26 Parischar and Harel,8 Mumtaz et al27 and Gidley et al.28 In 29 patients (10.74%), no organism was cultured, which was probably due to use of antibiotics at the time the cultures were sent. In our study, all patients were initiated on intravenous antibiotic therapy with amoxicillin, clavulanic acid, and metronidazole, which was later modified or change over to another antibiotic according to the culture and sensitivity report. In our study, surgical intervention was carried out in 94.81% of patients, which is consistent with the studies by Mumtaz et al,27 Eftekharian et al,21 Parischar and Harel8 and Har-El et al22 with surgical intervention required in approximately 78%, 79%, 100% and 90% of cases, respectively. Airway management is challenging in patients with DNSI. Usual causes of airway compromise are laryngeal edema and pushing of the tongue upwards and backwards, especially in Ludwig's angina. In our study, tracheotomy was performed in 0.74% of cases, which is not matching with the study by Eftekharian et al,21 in which tracheotomy was required in 8.8% cases. This might be due to the difference in selection of cases. A tracheal intubation with rigid laryngoscopy may be difficult in these patients due to the possibility of distortion in the airway anatomy, tissue rigidity, and a limited access to the mouth. Thus, the tracheotomy must always be considered whenever there is respiratory difficulty. Sometimes attempting intubations can worsen an already damaged airway.29

The three keys to successful management of deep neck infections are protection and control of the airway, antibiotic therapy and surgical drainage. The age-old dictum that all abscesses must be surgically drained has recently been tested in studies looking at the medical management of neck abscesses and the use of image guided aspiration of abscesses. However, many still practices by Levitt's thinking that “antibiotics are not a substitute for surgery, they should be used in conjunction with proper surgical drainage”.30

The decision on which antibiotic therapy to empirically start for patients with DNSI should be directed by the fact that the most commonly isolated organisms are Streptococcal species and anaerobes. The majority of infections are polymicrobial so broad spectrum antibiotic coverage is desirable. Improved gram-negative coverage should be considered in debilitated patients or immunocompromised patients. Of course, antibiotic therapy should always be adjusted as directed by culture and sensitivity findings in those cases in which a specimen is obtained.28 The duration of antibiotic coverage were decided on the basis of patients general condition and wound status like presence of slough, healthy granulation tissue or presence of induration.

DNSI remains a common and challenging disease for otorhinolaryngologists, and should be treated on emergency basis. In developing countries, lack of adequate nutrition, poor oral hygiene, tobacco chewing, smoking and beetle nut chewing has led to an increased prevalence of dental and periodontal diseases. In present study, Odontogenic infections were the most common etiological factor for DNSI. Therefore, prevention of DNSI can be achieved by making the population aware of dental and oral hygiene and encouraging regular checkups for dental infections. It is also very important to give special attention to high-risk groups such as diabetics, the elderly, and patients with underlying systemic diseases as the condition may progress to life-threatening complications. Early diagnosis and treatment is essential, thus, all patients should be initiated on treatment with empirical intravenous antibiotic therapy, which should be change over later according to the culture and sensitivity report. Tracheotomy should be considered if airway protection is needed and surgical drainage is the standard treatment of DNSI.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Chinese Medical Association.

References

  • 1.Levitt G.W. Cervical fascia and deep neck infections. Laryngoscope. 1970;80:40935. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197003000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Panoessa D.F., Goldstein J.C. Anatomy and physiology of head and neck infections (with emphasis on the fascia of the head and neck) Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 1976;9:561–580. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gidley P.W., Stiernberg C.M. Deep neck space infections. In: Johnson J.T., Yu V.L., editors. Infectious Diseases and Antimicrobial Therapy of the Ears, Nose and Throat. Saunders Company; Philadelphia, WB: 1997. pp. 500–509. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vieira F., Allen S.M., Stocks R.S.M., Thompson J.W. Deep neck infections. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2008;12:459–483. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang L.F., Kuo W.R., Tsai S.M., Huang K.J. Characterizations of life threatening deep cervical space infections: a review of one hundred ninety six cases. Am J Otolaryngol. 2003;24:111–117. doi: 10.1053/ajot.2003.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Durazzo M., Pinto F., Loures M. Deep neck space infections. Rev Ass Med Brasil. 1997;43:119–126. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42301997000200008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weed H., Forest L. Deep neck infection. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;3:2515–2524. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Parhiscar A., Harel G. Deep neck abscess: a retrospective review of 210 cases. Ann Otolo Rhinol Laryngol. 2001;110:1051–1054. doi: 10.1177/000348940111001111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ungkanont K., Yellon R.F., Weissman J.L., Casselbrant M.L., Gonzalez V.H., Bluestone C.D. Head and neck space infections in infant and children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;112:375–382. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59989570270-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Huang T.T., Liu T.C., Chen P.R., Tseng F.Y., Yeh T.H., Chen Y.S. Deep neck infection: analysis of 185 cases. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;26:854–860. doi: 10.1002/hed.20014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hasegawa J., Hidaka H., Tateda M. An analysis of clinical risk factors of deep neck infection. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011;38:101–107. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2010.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bakir S., Tanriverdi M.H., Gun R. Deep neck space infections: a retrospective review of 173 cases. Am J Otolaryngol. 2012;33:56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2011.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Boscolo R.P., Stellin M., Muzzi E. Deep neck space infections: a study of 365 cases highlighting recommendations for management and treatment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269:1241–1249. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1761-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wills P.I., Vernon R.P. Complications of space infections of the head and neck. Laryngoscope. 1981;91:1129–1136. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198107000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mayor G.P., Millan J.M.S., Martinez V.A. Is conservative treatment of deep neck space infections appropriate? Head Neck. 2001;23:126–133. doi: 10.1002/1097-0347(200102)23:2<126::aid-hed1007>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Meher R., Jain A., Sabharwal A., Gupta B., Singh I., Agarwal I. Deep neck abscess: a prospective study of 54 cases. J Laryngol Otol. 2005;119:299–302. doi: 10.1258/0022215054020395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sethi D.S., Stanley R.E. Deep neck abscesses: challenging trends. J Laryngol Otol. 1994;108:138–143. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100126106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Marioni G., Staffieri A., Parisi S., Marchese R.R., Zuccon A. Rational diagnostic and therapeutic management of deep neck infections: analysis of 233 consecutive cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010;119:181–187. doi: 10.1177/000348941011900306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tschiassny K. Ludwig's angina: an anatomic study of the role of the lower molar teeth in its pathogenesis. Arch Otolaryngol. 1943;38:485–496. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bottin R., Marioni G., Rinaldi R., Boninsegna M., Salvadoni L., Staffieri A. Deep neck infection: a present day complication. A retrospective review of 83 cases (1998–2001) Ear Arch Otolaryngol. 2003;260:576–579. doi: 10.1007/s00405-003-0634-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Eftekharian A., Roozbahany N.A., Vaezeafshar R., Narimani N. Deep neck infections: a retrospective review of 112 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266:273–277. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0734-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Har-El G., Aroesty J.H., Shaha A., Lucente F.E. Changing trends in deep neck abscess: a retrospective study of 110 patients. Oral Surg Med. 1994;77:446–450. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(94)90221-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Khode S.R., Bhat P., Rane S., Dasguota K.S. Retrospective analysis of 298 cases of deep neck infections: its diagnosis and management. Sci J Med Clin Trials. 2013;103:1–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stalfor J., Adielsson A., Ebenfelt A., Nethander G., Westin T. Deep neck space infections remain a surgical challenge: a study of 72 patients. Acta Otolaryngologica. 2004;124:1191–1196. doi: 10.1080/00016480410017864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Anil S., Al-Ghamdi H.S. The impact of periodontal infections on systemic diseases. An update for medical practitioners. Saudi Med J. 2006;27:767–776. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ridder G.J., Technau I.K., Sander A., Boedeker C.C. Spectrum and management of deep neck space infections: 8 year experience of 234 cases. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;133:709–714. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mumtaz R.M., Arain A.A., Suhail A., Rajput S.A., Mohammad A., Nabeel H. Deep neck space infections: retrospective review of 46 patients. J Cranio Max Dis. 2014;3:21–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gidley P.W., Ghorayed B.Y., Stiernberg C.W. Contemporary management of deep neck space infections. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;116:16–22. doi: 10.1016/s0194-5998(97)70345-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Osborn T.M., Assael L.A., Bell R.B. Deep space neck infection: principles of surgical management. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am. 2008;20:353–365. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2008.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Levitt G.W. The surgical treatment of deep neck infections. Laryngoscope. 1971;81:403–411. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197103000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery are provided here courtesy of Chinese Medical Association

RESOURCES